VOX DAY: MARTIAL LAW IS OUR CHRISTIAN HOPE

    So, ever since the COVID flu hit European and American shores, the Red Pilled menace hasn't been silent. Vox Day---whom they all seem to be parroting---has been especially giddy with excitement. To summarize about three weeks of his near-hourly verbal rampages, Vox sees some prophecy of Q Anon being fulfilled; is actually hoping for an imposition of martial law followed by slaughter and enslavement of every group whom these guys hate. 

   Of course, what these dodos are doing is engaging in a lot of psychological. Failures at life; they want an apocalypse where they'll be on top and everyone else will bow to them. In real life, martial law doesn't work like that. Out on the Pacific Coast, we're under a de facto martial law spearheaded by Left-Wing goons Gavin Newsom and Jay Inslee. They've set up orders that prohibit attending church. And sadly, many so-called Conservatives---who only a month ago were opposing things like these governors' tax and gun control policies---are suddenly all in favor of handing the cretins in Sacramento and Olympia absolute power over our very lives. In many US states now, the Constitution has essentially become a Dead Letter. This hardly sounds like anything that Agent Q promotes. 

  What's especially irritating though is that Vox has been interspersing all of these diatribes with hypocritical articles about the Christian Faith. It doesn't matter what their topics are: at this point, anything coming from Vox' mouth is blasphemy. He writes these things in between articles celebrating recent high-profile suicides, and advocating that Senior Citizens and immigrants be left to die. This is obviously neither a Conservative nor a Christian position, yet it seems that too many are buying into this false narrative. 

  " Hate is good for your health. Especially racial hate...if you weren't already convinced that anti-racism is immoral, at least you should now be able to grasp that it is both unhygenic and anti-public health. President Trump's "racist" action in shutting down travel from China earlier than the experts advised almost certainly saved many American lives."

  But, Vox: the President's travel ban wasn't racist in the first place. Just recently, Trump banned travel from Britain. And during the height of the epidemic in Asia, China not only banned foreigners, they prohibited Chinese people from travelling within China. None of this has anything to do with racial hatred. 

   Here Vox explains the Christian logic of letting the Elderly perish. It's actually a radical version of survival-of-the-fittest philosophy that even most Evolutionists would disavow in shame: 

  "This isn't a "Boomers must die" program. This is merely the time-honored, eucivilizational concept of "child-bearing women and children first". Only a Boomer could possibly assume that not being prioritized is tantamount to a death sentence."

   What a chump. For the people whom you disparagingly refer to as 'Boomers', it is very likely tantamount to a death sentence not to prioritize them. This is because Senior Citizens have a death rate from COVID-19 of 20% compared to less than 1% of people under 40. And since Vox has been quoting Scripture a lot lately: where exactly did Christ tell us to abandon care for the elderly? 

 "First, the principles of triage dictate that the old people most at risk be treated last. Their treatment consumes more medical resources to less avail than any other population. Second, the principles of economics dictate that old people most at risk be treated last. Their treatment costs considerably more, which means fewer of them can be treated. Third, the principles of fairness dictate that old people be treated last. They have already lived most of their lives, where the young have not. And fourth, the principles of societal survival dictate that old people be treated last. They can neither maintain or sustain society, while the young must live if society is to survive."

   This guy is seriously stupid. The Principles of Triage apply to mass-casualty incidents: not to epidemics where the Elderly is most at risk. The really frustrating thing about Vox is that he picks up terms that he doesn't understand himself and uses them to bedazzle the goofuses who follow him and understand them even less. In mass-casualty events like earthquakes, for example, physicians have to prioritize patients by the seriousness of their conditions. This isn't about rationing resources, as Vox claims. "Prioritizing medical treatement for the young over the elderly is not only acceptable, it is absolutely necessary, especially in times when resources are limited. Not only is it not "ageism" to deprioritize the treatment of the elderly, it is pure anti-societal narcissism for any elderly individual to demand equal medical priority for his age cohort." What we need in an epidemic is increasing resources---like finding a cure. For some reason, Vox doesn't think that the US or EU countries have the capacity to manufacture medical supplies. Actually, most EU countries have stockpiled medical equipment as national policy since the 1950s. 

   To give a sense of how grounded in reality Vox Day really is, here's his advice to President Trump---as if Trump pays any attention to anything that some kooky expat has to say: 

   "But it shouldn't end with a national emergency, as the next step will be a declaration of martial law as the Storm is unleashed. Note that European governments are already beginning to extend school and other closures to April 30th. Ever wonder how long it would take to round up, process, and try 150,000 people? Apparently about two months."

   There we have it. Trump is supposed to declare martial law and elevate the Alphas to power. The chumps who follow Vox actually believe this stuff. And to any mainstream Conservative who thinks that martial law is good---consider carefully that Vox is likely the source of what you're hearing.