BUSH 3.0 AND BEYOND

       The Neocons' sneak attack on Iran this weekend, using the barbarous Zionists as proxies, has started something of a ripple-effect in even some of the most obstinate supporters of the New Right, including a few within the Administration itself. Cracks were appearing last week, as protests began mounting---even in some very strong rural districts---against the Administration's ruthless deportation policies which are impacting the areas significantly, and considerable reaction to the heavy-handed policies imposed by unelected bureaucrat Elon Musk, who's gone into hibernation for the time being. 

       Throughout Social Media, too, it's not uncommon to hear "this isn't what we voted for!" although the warning signs that we were getting not Trump 2.0, but Bush 3.0, have been apparent and obvious for a long time. Even since the Inauguration, the placement of Deep State apparatchiks and Globalist ideologues in high positions were met with shrugs of indifference or even praise. As of late, however, the denials and excuses are wearing thinner and thinner, and the calls to react to dissent with force a la Bush, growing stronger. 

      Abandoning Reagan's reforms while pretending to uphold his legacy was characteristic of the Neocons between 1988-2016. The current incarnation pretends to uphold MAGA and the reforms of Trump's first term, while undoing everything positive done between then and the Scamdemic. The ICE raids and the pretext of the 'immigrant invasion' is merely a replay of Bush Sr.'s phony 'Drug War' the object of which was expand the powers of the Executive Branch and their collaborators on Wall Street. Junior's 'War on Terror' expanded these things even further, of course. The massive outsourcing of governmental functions and Regulatory Capture under our first and second 'Red Wave' Congresses found its counterpart this time in DOGE. The Democrats, incidentally, have gone along with all of these things.

     The Bush Machine's Foreign Policy was likewise an extension of its Domestic Policies. Attacking smaller countries under the most absurd pretexts was a Foreign Policy hallmark of the Neocons just as it is today; as was sabotaging potential economic rivals such as Russia and China. Like Bush's adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq, the recent Color Revolution in Syria and the attacks on Iran (with the Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine and Lebanon thrown in for good measure) are being carried out with the sole purpose of extending Wall Street/WEF Globalist Commercial and Financial interests to the maximum extent possible. Again, like Bush, we're told this is about upholding American Exceptionalism. 

         The question that should be coming up among Conservatives is how we regain control of the Conservative Movement. The Bush/Neocon Era at least did have some internal opposition, and the MAGA Movement grew out of the Tea Party. There were opposition candidates like Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul, but overall these movements suffered leadership problems. Trump harnessed some of that sentiment during his first term, but likewise suffered from a decided lack of competent advisors and administrators. The second term, with Trump suffering further under age and debility and have made a bad situation worse. 

      Another major part of the problem is that decades of Uniparty control have entrenched the power of the Ruling Economic Class to the point where there are very few avenues left to mount an organized movement. In the 1970s, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas spoke of Points of Rebellion, explaining where reform movements could arise. Most of these are gone. There are no more labor unions of any significance, Academia and Media have been totally put under Corporate control, and the military and police forces have been sold to Corporate contractors for a long time. Some churches and some courts and a few Congressmen have been fighting mostly a losing battle.

     However, even at this late stage, it is still possible to change course. During the Scamdemic and other Biden/Harris social engineering schemes, networking and community activism caused significant enough resistance that the Oligarchy was compelled to shift from the fake Left to the fake Right and re-package most of their agendas. The one thing that the Oligarchs most fear is the public becoming aware that the both political parties serve exactly the same interests. This is the reason that both the WEF and their current surrogates in the Executive Branch have focused so heavily upon controlling the outlets of information and stepping up police surveillance powers. Whether or not the escalation of the attack on Iran will serve the same purpose as a distraction that Bush's obsessions with Iraq or the Neocons' obsession with Ukraine did, remains to be seen. Iran is a much more formidable opponent for a variety of reasons: and we can't rely upon the psychological stability of the current crop in the White House to guarantee they won't escalate things beyond their ability to control it. We must watch and wait because the Great Reset, or the New World Order, or the Dark Enlightenment, or whatever name they choose to call it, ultimately will fail.