DIGITAL ID AND THE END OF PRIVACY

    During the lifetimes of many of our older readers, a concept enshrined by Dead White Males in our Constitution and upheld by subsequent Politically-Incorrect Oppressors was something called the Right to Privacy. As late as the early 1990s, there were actually Congressional Hearings and Supreme Court cases challenging Government and Corporate overreach into people's private lives. The saying of Abe Lincoln that "in America, a man is a citizen-king or he is nothing," and the common saying that "a man's home is his castle," were even repeated in the Mainstream Media extensively.

    That was then, of course, and this is now. Today, privacy is considered a suspicious activity; and insistence upon it presumed evidence of criminal wrongdoing. That position only applies, however, to us Little People. Julian Assange is rotting in a dungeon and Edward Snowden is away in exile for insisting that the activities of the Political and Corporate Oligarchy should be transparent. 

   As one example of this shift, a Bill proposed by Republican Thomas Massie which sought to repeal a 2021 law requiring auto makers to install Domestic Espionage spyware---including satellite technology which could disable a vehicle remotely---in all new cars by 2026 was defeated in a GOP-controlled House. The story got little media attention, which is unsurprising. The average Ameroboob doesn't even understand why personal privacy and government transparency are essential to freedom, and could care even less.

    Americans however like to pretend that the United States is a beacon of freedom; although like most other countries in our orbit, we are actually a predatory Plutocracy. We have a Constitution, but it essentially is a dead letter because confederated cabals of financial interests have more power than the tangible Government has, and dictate public policy under the guise that as private entities they aren't subject to the same restraints as political entities. 

   Tech Lord Bill Gates, now head of the Gates Foundation, is one of the top ringleaders and most active members of these cabals. Although nobody actually elected this jerk to do anything, he freely imposes national policies upon Americans and others because there are no consequences for his actions. His latest scheme---which his henchmen are promoting through the United Nations---is imposing a Global Digital Identification system---which naturally will be run by Corporations in which Gates has an interest. 

   Gates is experimenting with a mandatory Digital ID program in Kenya. Africa seems to be the Continent he prefers for human guinea-pigs after he was chased out of India a few years ago. There is an interesting and instructive backstory as to why Kenya in particular was chosen for the experiment. Up until last year, Kenya was a major thorn in the New World Order's flesh. Their President, Uhuru Kenyatta---the son of the first Kenyan President---crossed the Oligarchy's radar screen in 2015 by famously standing up to Obama and laying the condition upon the Leader of the US Deep State that he wasn't to promote homo 'equality' during a State Visit. There were multiple attempts to depose him, including a fake ICC indictment, in which Kenyatta defended himself and was exonerated.  Kenyatta went on to establish a treaty with his neighboring countries to form a bloc against Cultural Imperialism, in which religious leaders had considerable input.

   Although they never met, Kenyatta was impressed by President Trump, and began a swamp-draining campaign of his own during his second term. The program was extremely popular, and Kenyatta's popularity received a further boost by uniting with other African leaders to oppose Scamdemic restrictions. Late in his term, he joined China's New Silk Road initiative which created thousands of new Kenyan jobs including a modern railroad and port, and upgrading of Kenyan infrastructure. 

    Kenyatta was term-limited in 2022, and one would suppose that his Party---which was polling at 75-80% approval ratings would continue in office. But in an election which bore several suspicious similarities to the 2020 US Elections, Opposition Leader William Ruto was selected by the Supreme Court. Since then---also rather suspiciously---Ruto has been cozying up to the Biden/Harris Junta, with visits from the Junta's Defense Minister Lloyd Austin, the unofficial US Ambassador to the WEF John Kerry, and an upcoming visit from Foreign Minister Antony Blinken next week. 

    Prior to the Digital ID rollout, Gates also met with Ruto, reversing Kenyatta's long-standing opposition to foreign NGOs. The meeting between Gates and Ruto was held in secrecy with no Media or Legislative oversight. Kenyatta had pushed for a national ID reform, but Ruto's plan involves the participation of foreign agencies and foreign NGOs---a clear violation of Kenyan sovereignty.

    Although Gates' program in Kenya is still experimental, that hasn't stopped the European Union from rushing to impose a similar system upon the enslaved peoples of Europe. Much like Gates' earlier promotion of mandated Loyalty Vaxxes, his lackeys in Europe posing as presidents and prime ministers are rushing forward regardless of any potential consequences or egregious Human Rights violations. This shouldn't be of any surprise: the WEF Board of Trustees---which is backing the plan---includes the heads of the European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund, along with several CEOs of major European Corporate Cartels. 

   Americans will naturally react to these developments by rolling their eyes, taking a few more hits from the hookah-pipe and shrugging that it can't happen here, blissfully forgetting that within the last two years, Vaxx Passports came very close to being mandatory in the United States. In fact, Digital IDs have been on the table in the US for a long time. 

   In 1994, the Clinton Co-Presidency floated the idea of national digital identification papers as part of their proposed takeover of the healthcare system. The backlash which led to the loss of Congress that year caused the Clintons to shelve the plan. In 1996, however, playing upon the usually-successful Paedohysteria narrative, the Clintons proposed a national ID for the children, because as the Media tells us, there's a predator behind every blade of grass in America. Some cynic in the Clinton Administration even named the proposed system the Tessoria Project, apparently laughing in his sleeve over the fact that, historically, the tessoria was a medallion required to be carried by slaves in Ancient Rome to prove their ownership, much like we tag and register dogs and cats today. 

   Some Republicans then opposed the Clinton plans, but no sooner had Bush secured GOP control of the Federal Government than he rolled out a project called Real ID. This time, the scheme was sold as fighting the terrorist threat, and suddenly Conservative pundits and politicians weren't so concerned about Privacy Rights anymore (it's only bad when the Democrats do it). With typical Republican hypocrisy, they tried to pretend the program was 'voluntary' although it was set up so that non-participation would make life impossible.* (See note at the end of this article).

   Real ID was stymied in several State Legislatures. The Obama Administration extended Government surveillance and refused---and even encouraged--- further erosion of Privacy Rights. Since the Junta seized power, there has been a gradual phasing-in of Digital ID in America. Digital ID has become (for now) optional to access Government services including a simplified TSA screening-program. Several States have begun issuing actual requirements, and earlier this year, the Senate passed a Committee Vote to set up a Federal Agency which would operate a Digital ID system. 

   Amazingly, these stories haven't been widely reported, even by the Controlled Opposition Conservative Media. Likely the reason for that is because the proposal received nearly unanimous support from Republican Senators, passing the Homeland Security Committee by an 11-1 vote. In case anyone is interested, Rand Paul was the lone dissenting Committee vote, while Conservatives Ron Johnson, James Lankford, Mitt Romney, Rick Scott, Josh Hawley, and Roger Marshall all went along with it. No Democrats opposed it, although nearly all of them are endorsed by so-called privacy advocates like the ACLU. Certainly, though, the nearly half-billion dollars that Big Tech spends annually on lobbying efforts in the Beltway had no influence whatsoever on this unusual display of bipartisanship. An amazing coincidence too, is that we've recently seen overwhelming bipartisan support for Israel---one of the main exporters of Digital ID and surveillance software. Much of this technology is in collusion with Gates-controlled Microsoft---what another remarkable coincidence. 

    The Oligarchs have made no secret of their intentions to impose Digital ID mandates on at least half the nations of the world by 2028, and everywhere else by 2030. Expect this to be a complete non-issue during our so-called 'elections' next year; and likewise we can expect a real acceleration of the movement beginning about 2025. Non-compliance will entail the sort of "freezing out of society" for dissidents that the Oligarchs and their puppet-governments were promoting during the Scamdemic. Being forewarned gives us time to prepare, and we're already on borrowed time.

    ********************************************************************

   {Note: Bush's position was not too dissimilar to his father's when it came to outsourcing American Civil Liberties. The Social Security Act passed during the Roosevelt Administration specifically prohibits using the Social Security Number as form of identification. During Bush Sr.'s term, banks and insurance cartels began requiring an SSN, including a so-called Privacy Act Notice informing customers that they weren't legally required to provide an SSN, but these institutions would deny service to those who refused. When this was challenged, Bush said that doing business with banks or obtaining insurance was a 'voluntary choice' so consumers had a perfect right not to do business with them if they objected to their rules. Today, of course, nobody pays the slightest attention to the Social Security Act. Outsourcing tyranny to the Private Sector has become a New Normal.}