One of the remarkable features of the Postmodern United States that distinguishes us from other civilized nations is our tolerance (and likely even encouragement) of violent, often mentally ill and drug-addicted persons to terrorize and to pollute our city streets. We even encounter it in smaller towns. While there is a massive industry that profits off human misery, the policy is part of the Strategy of Tension which we've discussed here many times. Essentially, this is a defined as a deliberate "political policy wherein violent struggle is encouraged rather than suppressed. The purpose is to create a general feeling of insecurity in the population and make people seek security in a strong government."
This is why other countries don't have this problem. The mentally ill and addicted are removed and given treatment and the criminal element is dealt with through the Legal System. But such a policy---like we used to have in the US---doesn't answer the purposes of would-be authoritarians and amoral opportunists lobbying for Government contracts; the majority of whom belong in institutions and jails themselves.
In California, where the vast majority of these problems are occurring, Republican Mayor Rex Parris of Lancaster, a city in Northern Los Angeles County, has suggested distributing Fentanyl among the homeless population to reduce their numbers.
“You know quite frankly I wish the president would give us a purge,” referring to the 2013 horror film which featured a 12-hour period in which all crime was legal. “Because we do need to purge these people. Now is it harsh of course it's harsh but it's my obligation as the mayor of the city of Lancaster to protect the hardworking families that live there.
“There are a significant number of them that are criminals, that have no desire to work. You know in my religion, the Lord says if you don't work, you don't eat. Now what does that mean when you take it to its logical conclusion you know we should not be accommodating people who simply don't want to work I think that my constituents in Lancaster know exactly what I mean and know exactly that I am unwilling to accommodate criminals and that's why they have reelected me six times,” crowning his vileness with religious hypocrisy.
Sadly, Parris isn't alone among the New Right when it comes to promoting these kinds of authoritarian solutions. We've seen thugs like Texas Governor Greg Abbott suggest shooting down undocumented migrants in cold blood, Elon Musk justifying political assassinations, Republican Congressmen calling for deploying atomic bombs in Palestine and elsewhere, etc. Parris himself suggested during the height of the Scamdemic that anyone who knowingly spread COVID-19 should be charged with murder; in other words, he's the very type of character admired by the New Right where people who've actually killed others by trafficking in Fentanyl get Presidential Pardons if their social media following is strong enough.
It likewise should come as no surprise that Lancaster is home to several WEF-connected Corporations and Beltway Government contractors like Honeywell, for example, which profited massively from the Scamdemic Mask Mandates. Hence Parris' support for draconian positions during the last State of Emergency.
Since Parris brought up the subject of religious beliefs, I wonder how many Christian Conservatives in the US want to defend Parris' faith-based approach of killing off the undesirables with heavy doses of Opioids? Probably a lot do; they've looked the other way at and even applauded every other Barbarity suggested (or actually done) by anybody who acts in the name of the Red Pill. These are the same people who foamed with righteous wrath against characters like Biden and Pelosi who claimed to be Christian while supporting anti-Christian positions, but not a peep out them when our side does it.