NATALIE HARP

          This morning I happened to catch a really good interview on Daniel Davis' podcast with retired White House official Lawrence Wilkerson. Davis, we might recall, was nominated by Tulsi Gabbard to serve as Deputy Director of National Intelligence, but was blackballed by Zionist and Christian Nationalist factions within the Administration for insufficient loyalty to Israel. The whole interview is about an hour long and covered many topics; but Wilkerson's most important point begins at the 27:53 mark. So far, Wilkerson alone among major pundits (so far) has figured out that the New Right and the Deep State plan to stage a domestic crackdown and retrenchment in the Western Hemisphere in the wake of the Foreign Policy disasters. 

         Most Americans prefer to remain willfully ignorant of these machinations, which we have been pointing out for some time. Wilkerson, of course, has sources from inside these agencies; we here have drawn the same conclusions from the Elites' own statements and publicly-published policies. However, as we saw during the Scamdemic, Martial Law, power-grabs, and wealth-transfers don't concern most Americans too much. The Elites had the prudence back then not to close the legal marijuana stores or turn off the adult websites, so most Americans were content to stay under curfews, don their masks, take their Loyalty Vaxxes, etc. They won't behave any differently if what Wilkerson suggests come to pass.

        As proof of this, the major news story this week has little to do with any of the above-mentioned domestic issues, or the geopolitical scene abroad that is collapsing rapidly. There is a far, far, far more important issue absolutely capturing Ameroboob attention, focusing on a White House Staffer named Natalie Harp.

           Now, most Americans hadn't heard of Ms. Natalie until a few weeks ago when it was revealed that she was part of the entourage who slipped off Air Force One during the disgraceful escape from the NATO Summit. Basically what she does at the White House is roughly equivalent to a "Girl Friday" or top secretary who are somewhat common (or used to be) in most large offices. She's 35 years old, and, to be honest, is really nothing more than a teenage groupie who never grew out of that stage. To be equally fair, there's no shortage of MAGA women who are of the same description.

          Natalie is reasonably attractive for her age, and she's always in close proximity to President Trump who is much older. This mere fact alone was enough to trigger a flurry of salacious gossip and innuendo from the Incels, Male Feminists, and homosexuals (both closeted and otherwise) among the Controlled Opposition and their flying monkeys in the Corporate Media. This naturally drew responses from their doppelgangers on the New Right.

        We won't go into any of these vulgar accusations here. I'm not related to any of these people and if any of these allegations are true, I think that Melania is more than able to deal with such things if what I've heard about Eastern European women has any veracity. These 'controversies' really speak to the low level of American Culture in the 21st Century; as well as the degree to which sexual repression dominates it. Since the 1990s, when we saw Hilary Clinton and her Lesbian cohorts initiate the so-called Gender Wars, Political Correctness in human sexuality has reached the state of outright paranoia. A whole generation has been indoctrinated with this garbage.

        I must confess that I do find this phenomenon an interesting Sociological study. This is a major cultural shift that has happened during my lifetime. True, Postmodern Americans are extremely easily manipulated and prone to mass panic attacks over the most inconsequential issues; but human sexuality and gender polarity are hardwired into our instinctual psychology. Outside of psychopathic regimes like the Cambodian Khmer Rouge was, there's really no historical parallel for it and even in Cambodia it was imposed by a totalitarian government with little popular support. Even during the European Middle Ages, the Church encouraged sexual purity, but that had more to do with enforcing the sanctity of marriage than outright Sex Negativity. 

       Psychology long has known that the pathology of sexual repression in the individual leads to overt aggression---either against the self or others whom the afflicted projects his neurosis. The novelty in the postmodern English-speaking world is that the pathology has become a collective neurosis. Since a society is a collective of individuals, we'd have to conclude from this that sexual neurosis is a widespread condition. 

       Because there is no historical precedent for a society at this stage of degeneration, the outcome for a society in this state necessarily is theoretical It isn't researched today because it has become a Third Rail Topic: an issue that certain interest groups would prefer never be discussed. In 1978, we have a glimpse of the psychodynamics involved by a writer who predicted much of our cultural decline who stated this:

       "Late 20th Century peoples have erected so many psychological barriers against strong emotion, and have invested those defenses with so much of the energy derived from forbidden impulse, that they can no longer remember what it feels like to be inundated by desire. They tend, rather, to be consumed with rage, which derives from defenses against desire and gives rise in turn to new defenses against rage itself. Outwardly bland, submissive, and sociable,  they seethe with an inner anger for which a dense, overpopulated, bureaucratic society can find few legitimate outlets."

      In this author's day, he was describing a growing societal trend which has grown today to a mainstream condition. His last sentence explains why our culture has grown so tolerant of homosexuality and other perversions while repressing natural sexual relations: the social engineers have legitimized the Gay Lifestyle as a politically-correct outlet for all of this suppressed libido. By the same token, all of this repressed rage also can be channeled by the Elites into political aggression on behalf of an authoritarian regime. He continues:

      "The growth of bureaucracy (note: both governmental and corporate) creates an intricate network of personal relations, puts a premium on social skills, and makes the unbridled individualism of the 'American Adam' untenable." (Note: which explains why these 'return to tradition' movements on the Right are bound to fail, if applied literally. Most such movements are superficial in the extreme, and hold fast to cultural sexual repression in various 'traditional' guises). "Yet at the same time it erodes all forms of patriarchal authority and thus weakens the social superego, formerly represented by fathers, teachers, and priests. The decline of institutionalized authority in an ostensibly permissive society does not, however, lead to a 'decline of the superego' in individuals. It encourages instead the development of a harsh, punitive superego that derives most of its psychic energy, in the absence of these paternal authorities, from the destructive, aggressive impulses within the id. Unconscious irrational elements in the superego come to dominate its operation."

        We see in this depiction why these outbreaks of sexual hysteria are not simply a strange social quirk, but a pathological symptom of a deeply broken society. This also explains why even minor allegations of 'sexual misconduct' are treated with an uncontrollable (and irrational) rage in our culture. What we're basically seeing is the same intense jealousy that we see in prepubescent boys at men who are successful with the women they desire. From the other side, women are taught that all men are predators and rapists by nature and this brings to their minds the prepubescent childhood fears of being attacked by unknown men. Into this void steps the Gay Mafia who tells them that their primordial fears are justified.

        So, when we see these outbreaks of anti-sexual hysteria, know that it comes from interested social engineers playing upon the undeveloped or repressed fears and envy being weaponized against healthy and natural sexuality. Make no mistake: this type of propaganda is deliberately inculcated for those very purposes.