Sunday, September 15, 2019

MEN, TRADITION, AND COMMON-SENSE, PART II

   Since our last article was published, one of the participants in the debate, 'Scarecrow' at the blog Men-Factor wrote an interesting post highlighting some of the revolting behavior of our postmodern Western female population. To which he added the following rhetorical question:

   "Don't take my word for it - try googling things like this. It really shows how degenerate women have become. I guess that if men stop fapping, this would not be happening? I don't know."

   Well, the literal answer is that deranged women will do things like he describes regardless of anything men collectively do or don't do. But the real question being posed here is: Given the current shortage of quality women, why deprive men of artificial means of sexual gratification? 

   The answer to that question is that men shouldn't behave in counterproductive and self-destructive ways just because women do. And men today also need to take into account that our ancestors faced many of the same issues, and solved them. Contrary to popular belief, this not time in history that men have had. 

   Most recently in America, there was the Old West. After the Civil War when the West was opened up, the shortage of women became apparent and led to social problems. It wasn't uncommon for men working outside of towns to go for months without seeing a woman; let alone being with one. A couple of centuries earlier the shortage of women in the then-French colony of Quebec was so severe that King Louis XIV actually subsidized and gave Royal Pardons to low-level female criminals in French jails on the condition that they'd settle in Canada. In the time of Augustus Caesar, the ratio of single men to eligible women was six times higher than anywhere in America today. 

   These were pre-Feminist days; and despite Feminist propaganda and Manosphere Golden-Age idealization, what women got away with doing was comparable to anything they do nowadays. The Roman man, the French voyaguer, and the American cowboy were about as 'Alpha' as one could get, yet contemporary accounts showed that they were compelled to tolerate a lot from the fair sex. And the laws protected women then, too, much more so than men. 

   The point here is, as Eivind Berge pointed out again, that wholesale male retreating into pornography and autoeroticism is essentially a defeatist and sex-negative position. Effectively, all it is amounts to a denial of man's basic need for women---and what accomplishment is that? The homosexuals can say as much. And BTW, it's also not a widely-known fact that homosexual activists are deeply involved in the porn industry. 

   In our last post, we mentioned going into some more specifics about the impacts of these behaviors, that will be discussed in an upcoming article. 


Friday, September 13, 2019

MEN RETURNING TO TRADITION AND COMMON SENSE, PART I

    There have been a series of posts throughout the Internet lately, including an interesting debate in the Manosphere about whether or not activities involving pornography and, its concomitant, autoeroticism are forms of male sexual liberation; or whether they are in fact harmful activities. So far we haven't written on this topic because it is a complex issue but one that needs to be addressed and debated openly. 

    Postmodernism has given the West a society which is simultaneously sex-negative and sex-obsessed. Some writers like Dr. Rookh Kshatriya are absolutely correct that sexual jealousy which has been inculcated in the public by various interest groups have led to this paradoxical condition. Sexual power is both a goal to accomplish at all hazards in our society while at the same time those who actually achieve it are envied, resented, and despised. This phenomenon is based in Cultural Marxism; and as proof that envy is at the root of our sexual chaos, just observe other social phenomenon attacked by the Left. Our culture, for example, both hates the wealthy while it worships money. The inherent envy built into Neo-Marxism is at work there as well. 

  Norwegian blogger Eivind Berge got the debate really going again in a recent article titled Anosognosia. He made this very interesting observation:

  "It is true that the ability to "find sexual release" by means of visual stimuli and masturbation is a "feature" of male sexuality, but this is a great tragedy rather than anything to be celebrated. If you think this is a good thing, then you are suffering not only from anosognosia, but also a fetishization of disability, because a disability or maladaptation is precisely what it is in the current world. Our sex-hostile mainstream culture is all too happy to tell you that masturbation is fine. And then it institutes a (to the feminists) bonus level of oppression on top of that -- criminalizing a good bit of masturbation as well, usually by making at least some kinds of pornography illegal -- which is reliant on men being deluded into thinking these asexual pursuits provide some sexual value."

   Whether Mr. Berge realizes it or not, this was essentially the reasoning behind most Anti-Pornography laws which existed in the United States up until recent times. Granted, our politicians often embellished their laws with moral and religious overtones; but most doctors, social scientists, and some of the more educated clergy understood that Society had an obligation to at least discourage such behaviors. 

  Now, probably because of the differences between 20th and 21st Century technologies, we've seen certain trends emerge in society that are troubling. Berge points out that"when something is a major feature of their environment for long enough, species will tend to adapt to it. That has obviously not happened with Internet porn yet because it has only been around for one generation. Two generations if you include DVDs and VHS tapes, and before that there was no seriously compelling pornography."

   I wouldn't even argue that DVD/VHS technology was especially deep proliferation; but before that, it either required studio tapes or literature---mostly the latter. But even when our laws prohibited pornography, the lawmakers generally took the position that consumption of pornography was going to happen just given human nature: and while people caught with such material were subject to a great deal of judicial scolding and public shaming; they rarely went to jail over it. The law, however, was not so lenient with producers and distributors of it. 

  The changes in technology, have effectively made any discussion of bringing back the old laws a moot point; but that doesn't change the underlying science. But one important point that everyone seems to have missed in the whole recent debate is why our laws used to differentiate so sharply in terms of enforcement. This is because the consumer-end of the spectrum has no constant motive and, consequentially differing degrees of personal harm done. It runs the gamut from guys and girls who are just bored and having some naughty fun to hard-core porn/autoerotic addicts who can actually be quite dangerous.  Porn traffickers, in contrast, rarely have lofty social goals in mind while engaging in their trade. 

  And this, to my thinking, is an essential difference when assessing the actual harm that pornographic consumption and autoeroticism actually do. To some men, it does little or no harm: but no one cognizant of the facts could argue that should ever become socially normative---let alone superior to---natural sexual relationships. We will discuss the reasons why in Part II. Meanwhile, men struggling with the issue can check out some of the interesting links that Mr. Berge has provided. It's clear that the issue is becoming more widely examined among men. 
    

Monday, September 9, 2019

DUTCH GUN LAWS FAIL TO STOP MASS SHOOTINGS

   For the second time in six months, there has been a mass-shooting in The Netherlands. Details are still coming in as we write; but according to a social media post by Dordrecht Mayor Wouter Kolff, the situation is "very serious." Deutsche Welle reported that three people have been killed and at least one wounded; and that the shooting took place inside a residence.


   An earlier shooting took place in March of this year, when a gunman opened fire on a commuter train. Four were killed and six were injured in that attack. 

   There will be more details as the news develops. But what ought to be noted for us Americans that these shootings occurred in a country that has the strictest gun control laws in the European Union. According to the Dutch Ministry of Information:

   "In the Netherlands, the possession of all firearms and other weapons is prohibited. Non-firearms include various types of knives, fake weapons, realistic-looking toys and air weapons, electroshock weapons and self-defence weapons. If you want to own or trade in weapons and ammunition, you need a weapons permit. There are 4 types of permits: recognition, consent, authorisation and dispensation."

   The first of these two permits pertain to commercial uses of firearms. The latter two are two separate licenses a Dutch gun owner needs. The 'Authorization Permit' is a license to transport a weapon. The 'Dispensation Permit' is required to own one in the first place. As one might imagine, getting a permit of any kind isn't especially easy. The Ministry states:

 "The application procedure for weapons permits is subject to strict rules:
  • You must submit your application in person;
  • You must also be present in person when the storage facilities in your business or house are checked;
  • You must also comply with an examination of your mental health;
  • You must provide 3 references.
The police chief will decide on the basis of this information whether you will be granted a permit or not."
   Among the criterion for obtaining a permit, one must explain to the Police Chief his reasons for wanting to own a firearm. Self-defense is not considered a valid reason in Holland. The only reasons acceptable to the Dutch bureaucracy are for hunting and target-shooting. For hunting purposes, one must pass a government-approved safety course and be granted a hunting license first. This has to be done annually. The Ministry of Information notes that even "People who have one or more permits issued before 1 September 2017, and only from before that date, must go through the new procedure once."
   For target-shooting purposes, the Dutch require that one be a member of a government-approved shooting club for one year before a permit to own a .22 rifle is allowed. One can own larger calibers based upon how many years of membership they have. BB and Pellet guns are illegal unless one is over 18 and a member of an organization approved by the National Dutch Airsoft Association. 

  Dutch law restricts the maximum number of firearms one can own at five. They must be stored in a gun safe, and a condition of the Gun Permit is that the police come to your home once a year for a mandatory inspection. 

   We mention Dutch policy here for two reasons: one, to show that gun laws don't really work. The second is because, after every mass-shooting in America, the Internet chat rooms and message boards are flooded with Europeans lecturing us on how we need tougher gun laws like they have. In fact, American pundits were bragging (shortly before the March shooting in Holland) that gun ownership in The Netherlands was at its lowest level in 12 years. That news must have put psychos on notice that Holland is safe place to go on a rampage. 

   Gun laws in general are simply a knee-jerk reaction; politicians doing something for the sake of doing something. The American Gun Control Act of 1968, one of our strictest gun laws, was enacted for no other reason than Lee Harvey Oswald had purchased a rifle through the mail. Of course this law hasn't stopped a politician---or anybody else for that matter---from being shot since. Only six years after the law designed to prevent future Oswalds was enacted, President Ford was nearly shot twice; and six years after that, President Reagan was wounded in an attack. 

   But don't expect the Corporate Media to mention any of this in the wake of the Dutch shooting. Just like they routinely ignore gang violence in Liberal dominated cities, they won't report this either. 

   


Friday, September 6, 2019

HOLLYWOOD IDIOT RESPONSIBLE FOR FATAL CAR CRASH

   Earlier this week, the news broke that entertainment-media figure Kylie Rae Harris was killed in a car crash near Taos, New Mexico. She was a Country Music singer; also a heroic single mother, a wino, and given to weird emotional outbursts and other narcissistic behaviors. All of this is fairly standard for American celebrities these days, but what was surprising was the statement issued by Taos County Sheriff Jerry Hogrefe: “At this time I will say with most certainty Miss Cruz was an innocent victim of this senseless crash caused by Ms. Harris.”

   The 'Miss Cruz' to whom the Sheriff refers was Maria Elena Cruz---a young woman of 16 who was killed in the collision. But since she wasn't a celebrity and just a normal American girl, the Media didn't give her death much thought. The surprising thing in the Sheriff's statement was that he actually held a media figure responsible. As we all know, in today's America, celebrities get a free pass from law enforcement even when they cause somebody else's death. 

   And this is true of the Media, too. In researching this article, we went through the first 12 pages of a Google Search and so far haven't found one news story where Maria Elena Cruz was mentioned in the headlines. Kylie Rae Harris, in contrast, has several stories paying her tribute and engaging in national mourning; and showing photos of her fans slobbering in front of the cameras. There's even a GoFundMe link to support her now-orphaned daughter on page 4 of the search results even though she's inheriting an estate worth nearly 1 million dollars. Those of us little people in flyover country are expendable anyway; according to the thinking of the Elites who populate the fringes of our country (both the geographical and the psychological fringes). 

   We're going to tell a side of the story here that isn't told: that is, about the real people involved in these circumstances. 


   Maria Elena Cruz was 16 years old when she died. She was about to start her Junior year at Taos High School and was working during the Summer as a waitress at the Guadalajara Grill. She was evidently quite popular at her school and generally well-liked. Her former 5th-Grade teacher posted this on Facebook earlier today:


“I sent the following message earlier this evening to my former EGES 5th grade DL students who are now Taos High School Juniors, in the wake of the tragic loss of their beloved classmate, and my student, Maria Elena Cruz! I had purposely sent it to them as a PM in hopes that they would feel free to express themselves in private, which they did and are. I have since decided to share my message to my former DL students, on my FB wall to bring light to the fact that even though the tragic loss of this beautiful, intelligent, kind, hard working, and inspirational Teen won’t make the FOX and CNN syndicated news, Maria was also treasured, loved, and admired by all who met her. Her tragic death has impacted many young lives, former teachers, her beloved parents and little sister. A life with a future only a few can begin to dream of was cut short through not fault of her own! How many innocents have to die at the hands of someone who chooses to drink and drive before we open our eyes to this cruel and senseless act.”



    Maria Elena's father, Pedro Cruz, is the Deputy Fire Marshal in San Cristobal. He was one of the team of first responders who arrived at the scene of the fatal crash. I can't imagine what he must have felt: he had no idea that his daughter was involved in the wreck until he arrived there. A Funeral Mass is scheduled for Tuesday Afternoon.

     

    
      It's unknown whether Maria Elena was dating or not; but I'm confident that she had some male admirers. On the larger sociological scale, though, this is why the loss of someone like her impacts our culture as a whole. Our girls and young women are the future mothers, teachers, and caregivers of our next generation. They are of much greater value to society than the phony 'role-models' held up by Hollywood Trash Culture. 

   Though not publicized in the press, Maria Elena has a GoFundMe page to help her family during this time. The town of San Cristobal announced that the fundraising dinner planned for the Community Center earlier today had been changed to raise funds for the Cruz Family. For those living in New Mexico, donations can also be dropped off in person at the Taos County Fire and EMS Office, located near the Holy Cross Hospital at 1397 Weimer Road. 



    

Saturday, August 31, 2019

LEFTIST WHACKOS DeBLASIO AND GOODELL BUILD TRASH CULTURE MONUMENTS

     Well, as we slide into both the Labor Day Weekend and the start of NFL Season, NYC Mayor Bill DeBlasio and NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell are behaving like complete fools and giving the rest of the planet an opportunity to laugh at the stupid Political Correctness prevailing over here. 

    Under the leadership of Mayor DeBlasio, the Big Apple has been working feverishly to reclaim its crown as America's Cesspool from its numerous West Coast competitors. Recently, the mayor's wife hosted a PC contest called She Built NYC to build a monument to the most influential woman in the city's history. However, the Whacko Left on the panel of judges didn't get the results they'd hoped for. The public nominated a nun, Mother Frances X. Cabrini, for the honor.


   The panel overturned the public's decision unilaterally and nominated instead an abortionist and two transvestites to receive the reward. A petition to protest the decision, with further details, can be found here, for those interested. 

   Mother Cabrini was born in the former nation of Lombardi in 1850. In 1889, she came to New York as part of a missionary team. In 1909, she became a US citizen. Prior to her death shortly before Christmas, 1917, she had founded 67 institutions across the East and Midwest; including orphanages and the former Columbus Hospital System. Interestingly, she died while working at orphanage---making Christmas candy for homeless children---of a sudden illness.

   In 1946, Pope Pius canonized Mother Cabrini as a saint; making her the first naturalized American citizen so elevated. New York and Chicago both have streets named for her. In 1996, she was inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame and in 1998 the non-profit Cabrini Foundation was incorporated to carry on her humanitarian work. 

   And yet---the DeBlasio Administration decided---even against the public---that Mother Cabrini didn't deserve a monument, but sex perverts and baby-killers, did. NYC taxpayers are going to cough up $5 million to the 'artistes' putting up these offensive structures. 

   Meanwhile, the NFL wasn't lagging behind. They too are having a contest for their upcoming Centennial for the Most Influential NFL Figure of the Century. The now ultra-PC magazine Sports Illustrated named among its candidates,  "Sarah Thomas, the first female referee; Lyle Alzado, the first player to admit to using PEDs; and Colin Kaepernick, the man who attacked racial injustice by kneeling down," noted Heavy.com. A dyke, a drug addict, and a millionaire Left-Wing activist: hardly anything symbolizes what the NFL has become more than that. 

   Convicted felons Michael Vick and OJ Simpson are also on the list; along with girl-beater Ray Rice. Most of the others are 'first female' sportscasters and executives, and the big-money boys who helped turn football from a sport into---well, what it is. At least they managed to devote a passing paragraph to Jim Thorpe, the greatest athlete of the 20th Century who singlehandedly organized football into a professional sport. 


   The fact that Thorpe was an American Indian, we suppose, kept him from being relegated to the Dead White Male class. The real losers in both these contests, though, are the American people---who've been made to look like international chumps once again by our so-called 'Cultural Elites'. 



   

    

   

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

MASSIVE OPIOID RING MOWED DOWN

    The FBI is on the move again; this time cutting down a network of Houston-area clinics distributing dope under the guise of implementing Obamacare. A total of 41 people---including five known mobsters---were swept up in the dragnet. 

 "The charges allege participating doctors, medical professionals and pharmacies knew the prescriptions had no legitimate medical purpose and were outside the usual course of professional practice.  In some cases, “crew leaders” and “runners” allegedly filled or had the individuals who posed as patients fill the illegal prescriptions at Houston-area pharmacies.  The owner and pharmacist in charge at one pill mill pharmacy allegedly dispensed the second highest amount of oxycodone 30mg pills of all pharmacies in the entire State of Texas in 2019, and the ninth highest amount in the nation.  One hundred percent of the oxycodone dispended by this pharmacy – every single oxycodone pill that left the premises – was in the highest available dosage strength of that drug. On certain occasions the indictments allege that drug dealers and traffickers then allegedly diverted and distributed the controlled substances to the streets, with some pills trafficked from Houston to Boston." said Attorney-General Barr, in a statement.
   The DEA also closed six clinics, fifteen pharmacies, and issued nine suspension orders to other suspected facilities. The Agency estimates that over 23 million doses of Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, and Carisoprodol were pushed all over the city streets. All of these medications are issued by the government. Stories about these medicines turning up later as street drugs are becoming about as common in the US as mass-shootings. We do recall, however, that President Obama assured us all during the National Health Care debate that the system would be fool-proof against fraud and corruption. As we've seen on a regular basis now, the exact opposite has been the case. 
   In a related Swamp-Draining story, the DEA also announced today that one of its own members, a former Special Agent for New Orleans, is off to the slammer after pleading guilty to multiple counts of Obstructing Justice, Perjury, and Falsifying Government Records:
    "According to the evidence presented during the seven-day trial, Chad Scott, while a DEA special agent in New Orleans, committed these crimes in and around the New Orleans, Louisiana, and Houston, Texas, areas.  Specifically, the evidence showed that Scott directed a Houston-based drug trafficker to buy a Ford F-150 truck worth approximately $43,000 and forfeit the truck to Scott as part of the drug trafficker’s cooperation.  Scott then falsified the seizure paperwork for the truck in various aspects, including falsely claiming that he had seized the truck in New Orleans instead of Houston, in order to facilitate the vehicle being forfeited and given to Scott as his official government vehicle. Additionally, the evidence showed that Scott convinced the same Houston-based drug trafficker, as well as another drug trafficker in Houston, to testify falsely at a federal trial in New Orleans as to the identification of a major cocaine and heroin supplier in the Houston area.  Along with obstructing justice by inducing this false testimony, Scott then himself committed perjury during a motion session as well as during the federal trial, the evidence showed.  After a trial including this false testimony, the alleged supplier was found guilty.  Once Scott’s actions and the false testimony came to light, the case against the alleged supplier was dismissed by the court at the request of the United States."
     Three Louisiana Police officials who served on Scott's Task Force are also sitting in jail awaiting trial in October. One of these sterling characters robbed a home using a fake Search Warrant. He and the other two were caught with cash and narcotics in their possession that were supposed to have been forfeited to the DEA. The Swamp is indeed a very deep and dark place. 

    

Monday, August 26, 2019

FBI SINKS A SWAMP RAT

      This Swamp Creature was a really bad one, too. Robert Levy, a pathologist with the Department of Veterans' Affairs was jailed last week on three counts of Manslaughter and 28 various counts of Fraud. The VA has been notable since Trump took office for the sheer number of former federal employees who now become federal prison inmates. 

    Levy was head of the Pathology and Laboratory Medical Services for the VA Hospital in Fayetteville, Arkansas for 12 years, and analysed about 34,000 fluid and tissue samples which were intended to provide clinic information upon which to make a diagnosis for treatment. Levy, though, was a chronic alcoholic who frequently was drunk on duty. FBI specialists contend that about 18% were wrongly diagnosed; and one VA official believes that at least 15 veterans died from Levy's malpractice. Federal prosecutors have indicted him for three deaths, so far. His annual salary in that position was $225,000.

   Heavy.com summarized the three cases as follows:

   "One of the patients, a veteran identified as D.R.M. in the document, went in for biopsy in 2009. Levy ruled that the prostate tissue was negative for cancer. Because of that diagnosis, the man did not receive treatment and the disease was able to spread. The man died in 2016 from metastatic prostate cancer. In February of 2014, patient J.R.G. was wrongly diagnosed with “diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. A few days later, Levy changed the diagnosis to “adenocarcinoma,” which was also incorrect. Prosecutors said Levy falsified the medical record to make it look as if a second pathologist had agreed with the diagnosis. The patient received the wrong medical treatment and died from small-cell carcinoma on July 26, 2014. The third case prosecutors laid out also began in 2014. Levy was accused again of diagnosing a patient, J.D.Q., with the wrong form of cancer and again lying about a second physician having looked at the results. This patient died on September 13, 2015, after cancer had spread widely through his body."

  As was typical during the Deep-State years, many VA knew of Dr. Levy's condition, but were afraid to rock the boat. In 2015, however, his drunkenness became so apparent that he was finally reported to his superiors. They, however, took his denial at face value and allowed him to continue working. In March, 2016, his impairment was so severe during one lab test, that staffers removed him from the laboratory. He was tested that time, and found to have a Blood/Alcohol Content of 396mg/dl; which, according to specialists, is slightly below the stage of completely passing out. 

  The VA then issued a suspension to Dr. Levy. In July of 2016, he was placed in a 'diversion program' and reinstated in September on the condition of regular monitoring. The Indictment shows that Levy cheated on all of those tests by ingesting a chemical that altered the results to negative. It wasn't until the Trump Administration came into office that Levy was finally fired in 2018; though he largely undid himself after being caught at a DUI checkpoint. 

  Federal prosecutors haven't specified what the maximum penalty could be if Levy is convicted; but personally I hope that they haven't ruled out the death penalty. His case is yet another example of what we, as a country, left after the 2016 elections.   

   
   

Sunday, August 25, 2019

VOX DAY: FOOTBALL TEACHES ALPHA VALUES

   Manosphere goofus Vox Day had an article lately in which he made the following observation about postmodern American sports, specifically football:



  That's understandable. We've seen enough gang-related violence in both pro and college football to imagine them quite active when the shooting starts. Whatever Vox means by that. 

  What Vox is saying, though, about football instilling courage may have been true a few decades ago; but today football and most team sports are generally worthless as sources of role models for men. Here are the recent NFL headlines from TMZ Sports. 

  1. Former player, now sportscaster Desmond Howard incited controversy by saying on-air of a female collegue: "Am I going to have to choke that b---h?"

  2. Carli Lloyd, who aspires to be the first woman to play in the NFL, states that she's "gotten inquires from several teams." The Buffalo Bills hired a Lesbian coach a year or two ago.

  3. University of Alabama Head Coach Nick Saban invited woman-beating NFL star Ray Rice to speak to his players about "how to treat women."

  4. Dallas Cowboys' Team Captain Tyrone Crawford was involved in a massive bar fight. 

  5. New England Patriots' star Patrick Chung is charged with felony possession of Cocaine. The team has taken no action against Chung.

  6. Colin Kaepernick praised by anti-police activists. Kaepernick was also GQ Magazine's 'Man of the Year'.

  7.  Ex-NFL star Mario Williams arrested: "Video Shows Intense Standoff with Baby Momma," reads the headlines. 

  8. Oakland Raiders' star Antonio Brown is being sued for over $38,000 for not paying a professional chef/caterer after a party held at Brown's private mansion.

  9. Dallas Cowboys' Running-Back Ezekiel Evans was spotted at a Cabo San Lucas beach. Evans is holding out for higher contract, and hasn't been to training camp this Summer. He claims that his current annual salary of $3.85 million isn't enough. Four other top players across the league are also holding out.

10. Miami Dolphins' star Mario Walton makes a plea deal with prosecutors to "close out drugs, guns, and battery charges." 

11. The aforementioned Ezekiel Evans also had Battery charges dropped after a fight in a Las Vegas Casino. 

12. New England Patriots' star Josh Gordon is being reinstated in the NFL after failing drug tests last December. Gordon has been suspended and reinstated multiple times.

13. Billionaire 'gangsta rapper' Jay-Z is reportedly buying an NFL franchise. Wikipedia notes this about Jay-Z: "In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Jay-Z and Beyoncé supported presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at her rally in Cleveland. Clinton praised Jay-Z for addressing racism, oppression, and the criminal justice system."

   Bear in mind that the above stories were culled from TMZ reporting during the last 7 days. Is there a single thing there that any parent would be proud of their children doing?Contrary to what Vox Day says, it's really those of us who love American sports and deplore what they've become, are its real allies. And it's Vox Day and his Red-Pill stooges who are the real "ignorant fools and physical cowards."

  If anyone doubts that many NFL players are cowards, consider that there have been 29 players arrested since August 2018---seven of which were for beating or threatening women. The most recent one of these was Arizona Cardinals' player Darius Philon (6-1, 286 pounds) for threatening a dancer at a Phoenix nightclub with a knife. His teammate, Desmond Harrison (6-6, 295 pounds), was arrested in July for beating and choking an unidentified woman. Another Cardinal, Ricky Seals-Jones was arrested last year for beating up a hotel staffer who told him that the Mens' Room was full. Although a millionaire, Detroit Lions' player Trevor Bates refused to pay a $32 cab fare and beat up the police officer who responded to the scene. 

  Very rarely are these thugs ever seriously punished for what they do. Most times they get light sentences like 6 months in a fake 'Diversion Program'. Since August, 2018 only four players have been suspended by the NFL for personal misconduct---14 games total, meaning that the average suspension is three games. Twelve more have been suspended for failing drug tests---39 games total, meaning that the average suspension is three games. Just to get a sense of the NFL's priorities, Minnesota Vikings' Assistant Coach Mike Priefer was suspended for three games in 2014 for allegedly making "homophobic" remarks in public. 

   This is the type of 'manhood' for which Vox Day and others like him are grooming men to become. Being an 'Alpha' essentially means being a bully, a cheat, and a thug and getting away with it. Those are not the values America stands for. 








                                                                                       ---Vox Day 8/24/2019













   
   

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

PORTLAND RIOTS AND CALLS TRUMP 'DIVISIVE'

   So, last weekend a group of Red Pill LARPers with the latent-homosexual name of The Proud Boys, showed up in Portland, Oregon. Naturally since (much to the relief of Washington State and Northern California residents) Portland has become the local slough for every Leftist political malcontent in the region, Antifa Anarchists and other whackos turned out for what's now being called The Battle of Portland. A punch was thrown; a hammer was swung; and the Portland Police---who've long ago given up in frustration---watched for most of the melee.

   Portland hasn't always been like this. Once upon a time, Portland Police were allowed to do their jobs, were respected, and maintained order. Back then, Portland was a decent place to live. 


   Decades of one-party Democrat rule has completely emasculated the city. During the riot, here's one poor boob getting attacked just walking down the sidewalk:



  Notice how this guy is so demoralized and dispirited that he not only won't defend himself; but casually walks on home as if it were a normal occurrence. This is was life under Liberalism leads to. 

  Of course, Antifa themselves are a bunch of social parasites who contribute absolutely nothing of value to the world, They are total losers, but their thuggery is complete control of places like Portland. 

  When looking for causes of this stupid violence, the Corporate Media reflexively blame Trump and have been parroting the "this is the result of the Divisive Era of Trump"---as if a city where anyone with dissenting views are met with scenes like this:

---is actually being 'inclusive.'

  But that point aside, let's look back a few years and see if 'divisiveness' is really a product of the Trump Administration. Doesn't anyone remember the Obama Administration?


Or the Bush Administration?




Or the Clinton Administration?



  So it's the Democrats who've been preaching this 'divisiveness' line for a long time. And the Corporate Media Cartels with their endless barrages of anti-Trump fake news is exacerbating the situation. Gangs like Antifa have been fueled with this garbage---insulated from the Outside World in groupthink gulags like Portland and fed a steady supply of mind-altering drugs have convinced these clowns that 21st Century America is a reincarnated version of the Third Reich. 

  All of this talk of 'divisiveness' exists nowhere but in these people's own heads. The Trump Administration meanwhile has been draining the swamp, cleaning up corruption, making government more responsive and efficient, and expanding the economy. That's not 'division' but unity. And it's the type of unity that the whacko Left can't tolerate. 

Friday, August 16, 2019

NFL GANG VIOLENCE AND TRASH CULTURE

   For the second time in two weeks, rival gangs broke out in violent action as crowds of onlookers egged them on. This latest fight happened in Berea, Ohio between rival Ohio and Indiana gangs.





  OK, so technically this wasn't a street fight, but an NFL-sanctioned preseason scrimmage. But these days, it's getting harder and harder to tell the difference. 

   This year is the 98th Anniversary of the NFL and the sport has sunk to this level. There were at least five fights in this game and one Cleveland player went to the hospital with a broken ankle. 

   The National Football League came into being in 1921, and there are only three active teams still around from its inaugural year. There has always been a long-running battle within the NFL (and pro and college sports in general) between the Sharpers who are in it for the money and the Sportsmen who are in it as a labor of love. Since the NFL-AFL merger in the 1970s and the Players' Strikes of the 1980s, the latter has been losing ground to the point where any coach or owner who talked about 'fair play' would likely be laughed out of the league today. Witness what Cleveland coach Freddie Kitchens had to say about his team's on-field thuggery:

    “I told you guys yesterday, we are not into backing down from anything. We identified a problem yesterday, not that there was anything wrong with the tempo, but we set the tempo...I just know that we are not going to take nothing from anybody. At some point, you have to stand up for yourself. If it is a penalty then it is a penalty, but sometimes… I don’t know.”
   It's not really any great mystery, Freddie. You tell your players not to get suckered into fights and dirty play, but to concentrate on executing plays and winning fair-and-square. That's what real coaches like Tom Landry used to tell his players. Landry, by the way, had five NFC Championships and two Super Bowl wins to his credit. How about you, Freddie?

  Kitchens' gangland/Trash Culture attitude is hardly unique in sports; or for that matter, in society in general. Nice Guys Finish Last and Winning isn't Everything, it's the Only Thing, are the mottoes dominating society---of which our sports are a reflection. Cleveland sportswriter Randy Gurzi inadvertently summed it up while writing about the fight/football game:

   "A little dust-up here and there is one thing, but this screams lack of discipline. I may be old-fashioned, but I never liked the joint practices and this is a reason why."

   What Gurzi essentially is doing is almost blushingly apologizing for his passe belief that discipline and sportsmanship should actually be part of a contest. 

   And it's not just sports, but Hollywood, too, promotes the same lack of ideals. How many action films of the last four decades depict the 'heroes' as winning by over-excessive force; or by cheating; or otherwise using dirtier tricks than the villains? In the earlier eras, we certainly didn't see that.



   All of this glorification of gratuitous violence comes from a deeper social problem. Cynicism---the belief that good guys never really win and that Might makes Right is at the bottom of this phenomenon. And this widespread sensation among the general populace is directly traceable to a breakdown in religious faith. St. Paul taught us that, without Faith, life becomes a matter of "eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow we die," becomes socially normative. The 'Win at all Costs' mentality is only one step removed from that. In contrast, Faith teaches that Good will triumph in the end; and that God works for Good even in the midst of the most atrocious evils which Man can devise. One Catholic Cardinal (I don't recall which one) once said that Cynicism is born of Despair, which he described as a sin akin to Atheism. When asked why he thought so, His Eminence replied that "Atheism denies God's existence; but Despair denies God's goodness." This is a very good point. 

   In broader social terms, a society that loses its faith in God as Supreme Good becomes a predatory society. And we wonder why there is mass-violence all across the land? Almost all of these mass-killers in recent history were nobodies who wanted to be somebodies by wiping out defenseless people. All that these murderers really did was what they've been taught by institutions like the NFL, Hollywood, Academia, and the Deep-State Government. The killers just took the philosophy to its logical conclusion. 

   It's hypocritical therefore to claim that gratuitous violence can be stopped by gun control, or banning video games, or anti-bullying campaigns, etc. The answers to the problems have to come from within, first and foremost. 




   

   

Thursday, August 15, 2019

EPSTEIN'S ARTISTIC TASTES

    With an alacrity worthy of his predecessor, Attorney-General William Barr has gone into the Epstein Case like a juggernaut. It appears that at least a few of Epstein's guards are about to trade in their uniforms for black-and-white striped suits, with Warden Quay not far behind. Meanwhile, the FBI swooped down on Epstein's properties and found some interesting items at the late financier's Manhattan apartment. 

    Like many wealthy people, Jeffery Epstein was a patron of the arts. However, many FBI operatives who've been speaking to the press have noted that Epstein's tastes were---to put it mildly---a bit peculiar. For example, there was a life-size doll in a wedding dress hanging from chandelier. Another strange exhibit was a stuffed black poodle---mounted so as to appear to be depositing some dog poop. There was also what the agents described as 'a human chessboard.' I think that those three things alone go a long way into summing up Jeffery Epstein's personality. 

   The strangest artifact of all, however, was a portrait of our illustrious 42nd President, Mr. William Jefferson Clinton. This picture has been widely circulated already on the Internet; and for the sake of suffering humanity we've elected not to post it again here. Instead, we're posting some relevant Album Art:


    Long ago, I thought that I'd reached a point where nothing that Bill Clinton would do would surprise me (unless, of course, it was some noble act). But when multiple stories began appearing about him allegedly posing Epstein's art collection, I really did a double-take. Is this really Bill Clinton?

   Research has come up with a mixed answer. It appears that the painting originated in 2012 and was exhibited at the New York Academy of Arts' annual Tribeca Ball. That year's host was that shining specimen of humanity, Robert Di Nero. 

  "Champagne in hand, guests explored the sprawling studio and congratulated the artists, who continued to paint, paint, sculpt, sketch, and create throughout the night. The Academy is considered the premier institution for studying the human figure, so naturally, its students' artwork focused on the body. Nudes were a common sight -- and not just on the canvas. In one room, a naked model held a pose while well-dressed patrons, seemingly unaware, munched on miniature hamburgers." said NYC society newsletter, G of G. 

  It's unknown really whether Bill Clinton actually posed for this portrait. But one of the British newspapers reported that the FBI found it "prominently displayed" in Epstein's apartment. Clinton was a regular visitor there, so he couldn't have helped but have been aware of its existence. 

   What we can take away from this story is further proof yet that the so-called 'Elites' who ran this country for the last three decades were nothing but a pack of criminals, perverts, and degenerates. Most of us knew or suspected that was the case all along; but the exposure they've been getting since 2016 shows that they even worse than many of us imagined. Just remember that characters of the Epstein, Clinton, and Di Nero sort are the ones who want Trump out of office and hope to regain power in 2020. We can't let that happen. 

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

THE ALPHA WIDOW MYTH

   The collection of cornballs who make up the modern 'Manosphere' often invent neologisms and soundbite phrases to give their fallacious arguments an aura of intellectual profundity. They typically try to back up their theories with anecdotes which they in turn extrapolate into 'commandments' and 'laws' and 'points' and various other dogmas which give their movement its cultish aspect. 

   One of terms they bandy about is Alpha Widow. This is a term basically concocted to give moral justification to Game/PUA punks who can then fantasize that they were the best sexual partners women ever had and flatter their egos by imagining that other men are jealous of them; and that these women still think about the Gamers and long for them. The Red Pills blame the women for this situation, of course. Now, Rollo Tomassi, a.k.a. The Rational Male, has written a long article on the subject of Alpha Widows. Naturally, he considers himself an expert on such things, and gives a definition of how this 'phenomenon' comes about:

  "To understand the phenomenon of the Alpha Widow we must look at women’s evolved mating strategy – Hypergamy, a woman’s intrinsic desire to balance the best quality sexual/reproductive male with the best provisioning/parentally invested male. Since a woman’s mating strategy centers on quality in a long term partner(s) women tend to focus on ideals in men. The imperative drive for mate quality extends to both sides of women’s Hypergamous equation; the best genetic, sexual experience and the best long term security potential."

    This is completely false; in fact, it's projecting male mating instincts upon women. There is no such thing as female hypergamy. It is men who are biologically and psychologically fixed to mate and reproduce with the best quality females. Tomassi afterwards claims that "only females are hypergamous" but that assertion doesn't even make logical sense. Why does anyone suppose that men are consistently attracted to young and physically beautiful women? It's because such women are---biologically speaking---best fitted for reproductive capacity. Since it's men who pursue women sexually and not the other way around, hypergamous tendencies in women would serve no biological purpose. 

   Understanding of this basic fact is the reason why civilized cultures practice monogamy. An example of the social disasters which follow among peoples who don't can be seen in the Middle East, where powerful Sheiks and oligarchs amass harems, leaving a large swath of alienated men who channel their frustrations by joining Jihadist cults. In monogamous cultures where men have a wife and a stake in society, they channel their surplus libido into productive pursuits. If we look at American history---especially of the 18th and 19th Centuries, it's noteworthy that the most productive leaders of our culture also typically had large families. 

   Tomassi continues:  "Hypergamy never seeks its own level – it is always seeking a better-than-merited exchange in SMV compared to her own...When a woman misses the opportunity to consolidate on a confirmed, high SMV (sexual market value) male that man becomes the new standard for what she believes she can attract as a potential mate."

   This is also false. The late 'Sir Guy' of the blog What Women Never Hear wrote extensively about how feminine idealization of men evolve. It has nothing whatsoever to do with a man's so-called 'Sexual Market Value'. 

   Women develop a concept of a male ideal before they even reach puberty. While this ideal might have some physical component, it is primarily based on a man's character and how he fits a girl's emotional needs. Tomassi seems to be utterly ignorant of the fact that women's sexual needs are subordinate to---or, at the very least, highly dependent upon---her emotional needs. With women these two things are not separable. Even in pathological cases like Nymphomania, it's been demonstrated that the craving for sex is related to an unfulfilled emotional or psychological problem. 

   Tomassi further expounds that: 

    "Even if a woman’s perception of her own SMV isn’t realistic her Id wants what it believes it can get...The worst existential prospect for a woman is to have her mating strategy superseded and controlled by that of a suboptimal man." 

     First of all, in the course of normal human development, the Id doesn't play much of a factor after a child reaches about 3-4 years of age. Tomassi clearly knows nothing about Developmental Psychology, but---like most of his stripe---picks up and throws around scientific jargon which he doesn't understand himself to confuse and impress his credulous followers. 

    The statement which follows, i.e. that women subconsciously dread mating with a sub-optimal male is contradicted even by casual observation. Women not only often settle with a fairly average man, oftentimes they will choose relationships with some worst and least suitable men. This is because a woman's worst existential fear is not centered on the man with whom she reproduces: women's greatest fear is being unable to reproduce at all. In women who mate with thugs or have multiple children with different men, this fear has typically reached the level of absolute terror. Some women can sublimate this fear and lead productive lives though they remain childless---for example, nuns like Mother Teresa---but probably the majority of women can relate to this fear as fact.

   The remainder of Tomassi's article is based on these premises, and since the premises are false, his subsequent arguments carry no weight. 

   The real danger in philosophies like Tomassi's is not simply that it turns men into embittered fools---many of his followers were already at that point and Tomassi only helps them refine their embittered foolishness. The real danger is that it erodes the bonds of trust between the genders and incidentally exacerbates all of the damage that Feminists are already causing. 

    The good news for men though is that Alpha Widows---like most other Red Pill chimeras---don't really exist. For men who do worry about things like past lovers, the best solution is to focus on actually being the best man your girl's ever had and most of these fears will dissipate.