After his loyal toady Doug Burgum was interviewed by RINO yes-men during Thursday's Confirmation Hearings, Burgum's owner Bill Gates met with the Incoming Head-of-State for a three-hour Power Luncheon.
"Reflecting on Trump’s role during the Covid pandemic, Gates recalled how he had 'accelerated the vaccine innovation,' and urged Trump to take a similar approach with the HIV cure that the Gates Foundation is actively working on. 'So I was asking him if maybe the same kind of thing could be done here. And we both got, I think, pretty excited about that. I was frankly impressed with how well he showed a lot of interest in the issues I brought up,” he added, noting that Trump appeared “energized and looking forward to helping to drive innovation.”
.jpg)
There is no word on whether or not Gates will join Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos among the woke Plutocrats attending the Inauguration ceremonies at Mar-a-Lago yet, but he'll likely be in close contact. Besides Doug Burgum, the Incoming Government has one of Gates' confederates, Vivek Ramaswamy, who was working with Gates to develop Vaxx Contact-Tracing software for the Biden Administration. With the USDA appointee a Revoving-Door Beltway lobbyist and in the probable event that Robert Kennedy is thrown under the bus by the Senate, Gates' fellow-WEF confederate Mehmet Oz can take over HHS and Gates will be right where he was before.
None of this, of course, will convince any of the True Believers. Not that it matters, one of Trump's first-day agenda items is to check in with his bosses at the WEF right after being sworn in.
I wish that we had some words of consolation for everybody; but I'm afraid they're lacking. For the last year or so we've tried to warn people about the direction that the Republican Establishment was taking; and we just got shouted down for our trouble. People wanted to replace the Government with a Corporate Board of Directors under a figurehead leader---because that system has worked so well in the past; but Postmodern Americans are all about acting first and thinking later.
Too, there's the contingent who rationalize and say words to the effect that: "Well, it would have been worse if Kamala had gotten in." I agree that it wouldn't have been any better; but wouldn't Kamala have had business meetings with Gates and had Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg at her inauguration too? Wouldn't she have appointed WEF-connected people to positions of power; or George Soros' right-hand man to lead the Treasury Department? Wouldn't Kamala have hosted homo-rights activists and appointed them to key positions too? Wouldn't she bring in people like Kash Patel and Tom Homan who were high-ranking people in the Obama Administration; or top Democrat fundraisers like Howard Lutnick to head the White House Transition Team?
Questions like these were (and still are) rarely ever raised. The repulsive and very questionable characters surrounding the Republican Campaign of 2024 were never examined in any detail, which is bad enough; but add on to this the evasions of their candidates when pressed for solutions and their proclivity for publicity stunts in lieu of actual policy and we see overall a movement built on nothing but a tissue of lies and chicanery. It's no argument to point fingers at the Democrats: the Democrats' multitudinous crimes don't justify the Republicans' copying them.
With the phony 'transfer of power' less than 48 hours away, we have to start facing the Reality of what's about to happen. The goals of the Great Reset haven't changed, the same people are going to be directing it, the Constitution will continue to be eviscerated; and all we're really getting is one class of scapegoats substituted for another and one brand of Political Correctness superimposed over the old one.
.jpg)
This is an interesting question, "but wouldn't Kamala have had business meetings with Gates and had Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg at her inauguration too?"
ReplyDeleteNo, because rather than being an evil WEF super villain, I suspect she is more of an incompetent, likely with a drinking problem. The same could be said of Biden with his major age related decline.
In history, generally when someone's king was insane or incapacitated in some way, life was worse for people on the ground than when they had some evil, diabolical leader in charge. When nobody is running the show, every two bit, power hungry character tries to rush in and fill the void. I think we see evidence of this on the Republican side out in the culture, with all the shady characters currently jockeying for power.
LOL, this is not very reassuring, but those power plays are all going to work themselves out and if they don't, we won't be any worse off than we were before. The worse thing in the world is to have power void at the top which is what we've just experienced for the past four years.
Things haven't always worked out historically when people took on a strong leadership to replace a weak one. The degenerate French Monarchy in 1789 gave way to the Reign of Terror and the effete Russian Czars in 1917 gave way to the Bolsheviks. We all know what happened to the decadent Weimar Republic in 1933.
DeleteUltimately, though, I believe that the Great Reset will fail; but I think we're going to have a rough time of it before it does.