LAW AND ORDER PARTY, MY FOOT

    During the last three years, and the last 18 or so months especially, I have become increasingly disillusioned with what passes for a 'Conservative' movement in the United States. We're seeing less and less distinction between Right and Left every day, it seems. True, since Bush Sr.'s day, we've had to deal with Neocons and RINOs; but at least there was an actual populist Conservative faction that would stand up to them on occasion---finally this bore some fruit when President Trump was elected. 

   After Trump was overthrown in 2020, we've seen a new movement brewing on the Right. The "New Right", "Christian Nationalism" various other names are applied to it, but it's simply a more mainstreamed version of the "Alt-Right" that was around in the 2010s. The Neocon wing of the GOP has adopted this new way of thinking because they see it as a 'winning strategy.' We've always referred to the Alt-Right as Alt-RINOs, because---like the Neocons---they're simply reactionary Liberals. That is how they've been able to join forces despite their superficial differences. Take an example like Florida Governor Ron DeSantis; who talks and behaves like a stereotypical Alt-Right, Red-Pilled manly Alpha leader while raking in millions in contributions from pro-Establishment jugheads connected with people like the Bush Machine and the Koch Family. 

   Starting with the 2021 Midterms, but really accelerating in 2022, we saw this new philosophy really gaining momentum. It seems like every day there's some new story about some based politician doing something as bad as---or worse than---what we've come to expect from the Whacko Left. This behavior isn't being condemned; it's being praised effusively all across the Internet. Just yesterday, the Republican Governor of Montana signed a Bill banning Tik-Tok statewide. Since when did Cancel Culture, Deplatforming, Censorship, and blatant interference with the Free Market become Conservative values? Of course, Governor Gianforte is an Alt-RINO scumbag from way back; even before he became governor we profiled his attitudes towards free speech and freedom of the press here. Note that back in 2017, we called him part of the 'fringe;' today he's a State Governor, which ought to show us all that this Party has moved in a decidedly unwholesome direction. 

   All throughout 2020/21, we heard the Whacko Left seriously suggesting that those who refuse the Loyalty Vaxx should be frozen out of society; including literally being ejected from it through mass-deportations. Not a few months later, the same targets of this Liberal venom were celebrating governors who stuffed immigrants onto buses and drove them for two days with no provisions and dumped them in snowdrifts. Victor Davis Hanson---one of those who passes on the Postmodern Right as a great intellectual---opined that it was "a teachable moment for pro-immigration Liberals" as if the displacement and maltreatment of a few hundred human beings was something incidental to the whole story. It should also be noted that in 2022, not a single Republican Governor who participated in the aforementioned Scamdemic lockdowns lost his seat as a result. 

   Hanson was back in form the other day, howling his usual jeremiads, this time over the controversy surrounding the downfall of GOP Congressman George Santos. The upshot of Hanson's wailings---which is being echoed all throughout the Controlled Opposition media---is that it's so unfair and so outrageous that the Left gets a free pass when they get caught doing scummy things. Maybe a genuine Conservative approach would be to note that Santos came from a local Party machine that previously gave us such sterling figures as Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg, and maybe our side should start vetting its candidates a little better instead of giving knee-jerk support to anybody who posts an 'R' after his name. 

   But, of course, that would be the Conservative approach: standing up like men, owning up that we made a mistake, and tossing Santos out of Congress and into jail where he belongs. But that was yesterday's Conservative approach. 

   

    Paul Gottfried, another product of Conservative, Inc Academia has penned a very pragmatic article warning of The Mad Delusion of Overscrupulous Republicans. According to this self-described "philosopher, historian, and columnist," we shouldn't be too hasty "piling on to their doomed foot soldier," and that "These legislators shouldn’t allow themselves to be diverted from their work by those who urge them to exhibit 'good manners.'" Gottfried argues that, in spite of Santos' "misdeeds and blunders" the Gentleman from New York "is still serving our needs, and the only reason the opposition is screaming against him in hypocritical rage is their hope of reducing the slim Republican majority in the House to the point where it becomes unworkable." 

   So, let's have a look at the 13-Count Federal Indictment to see what a few 'blunders and misdeeds' actually looks like:

  "A 13-count indictment was unsealed today in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York charging George Anthony Devolder Santos, better known as “George Santos,” a United States Congressman representing the Third District of New York, with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives...

  "Beginning in September 2022, during his successful campaign for Congress, Santos operated a limited liability company (Company #1) through which he allegedly defrauded prospective political supporters.  Santos enlisted a Queens-based political consultant (Person #1) to communicate with prospective donors on Santos’s behalf.  Santos allegedly directed Person #1 to falsely tell donors that, among other things, their money would be used to help elect Santos to the House, including by purchasing television advertisements. In reliance on these false statements, two donors (Contributor #1 and Contributor #2) each transferred $25,000 to Company #1’s bank account, which Santos controlled. As alleged in the indictment, shortly after the funds were received into Company #1’s bank account, the money was transferred into Santos’s personal bank accounts—in one instance laundered through two of Santos’s personal accounts.  Santos allegedly then used much of that money for personal expenses.  Among other things, Santos allegedly used the funds to make personal purchases (including of designer clothing), to withdraw cash, to discharge personal debts, and to transfer money to his associates...

   "In mid-June 2020, although he was employed and was not eligible for unemployment benefits, Santos applied for government assistance through the New York State Department of Labor, allegedly claiming falsely to have been unemployed since March 2020.  From that point until April 2021—when Santos was working and receiving a salary on a near-continuous basis and during his unsuccessful run for Congress—he falsely affirmed each week that he was eligible for unemployment benefits when he was not.  As a result, Santos allegedly fraudulently received more than $24,000 in unemployment insurance benefits."

   This gives a whole new meaning to the term 'cheap politician.' Santos is facing 20 years in the Pen for swiping about $80,000...still a lot of money, but it averages out to $4,000 a year: about a third of what an SSI recipient gets. And he'll have to pay it all back on top of it. 

   Nevertheless, Gottfried's brilliant solution to all of this is offering the Democrats an exchange: swapping one of their corrupt members for Santos' resignation. (Like that's really going to happen). His hands are thrown up in pious horror that, in case of impeachment, Santos' Seat "would most certainly fall to a very left-leaning Democrat," and rhetorically asks "Do our GOP moralists, including pecksniffian critics in the GOP, believe Santos should resign in favor of this likely successor?"

   The answer is no: Santos should resign and the dunderheads in the RNC should do some productive work for a change and replace him with a better candidate. It's not 'a certainty' that a woke Democrat would win; Santos won it himself after all. It hardly gains the Conservative Movement any credibility to spout off about their commitment to 'The Rule of Law' then start circling the wagons around crooks and playing the Victim Card about how "Democrats do it too!" 

  Doesn't right or wrong mean anything to this Party any more? Or have we become like the Left to the point where political correctness is the lens through which everything is examined? I probably agree with Bruce Jenner politically on most issues: that certainly doesn't mean we should support troons as our representatives and spokesmen. 

    Arguments and evasions like those proposed by Hanson and Gottfried aren't fooling anybody; they make us hypocrites and buffoons. Worse still, politicians like Santos, Gianforte, and DeSantis make us dangerous hypocrites and buffoons. As Vox Day, one of the godfathers of the Alt-RINOs said, "We are the Alt-Right and both the Left and the Cucks are terrified of us, because unlike the Cucks and Cons, we are trash that not only punches back, but punches back twice as hard." It may be so; but very few of us oppose Postmodern Neo-Liberalism because we're not getting hit hard enough. 

    We've got to be better than this. We need to win people with Faith and Reason; offering workable solutions to real problems that will benefit everyone instead of mimeographing Democrat extremism and overreach. We need to drop this ridiculous 'Alpha' posturing and start acting like men instead of a bunch of elementary school boys arguing about whose dad can beat up the other kid's dad. That's not how you run a Government. 

FINANCIAL OCTOPUSES TIGHTEN GRIP ON FREE SPEECH

      Last January, the de facto Government of the Anglosphere countries and their satellites/colonies throughout the world met for their annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland. Their theme for 2023 were plans to 'combat the threat of disinformation,' i.e. laying out a blueprint to impose censorship as resistance to the Great Reset has been growing online and elsewhere. 

    Many Americans tend to see the World Economic Forum and its confederated affiliates as a group of out-of-touch eggheads and academics. The Controlled Opposition Conservative media reports on their doings with sneers and eyerolls, but rarely follow upon how frequently these WEF agendas translate into public policy---either imposed by nominal government or by Corporate interests aligned with the WEF. In our previous article, we mentioned a few examples (out of many). Let it not be forgotten that one of the Biden/Harris Junta's first acts upon seizing power was appointing the serpentine Deep State operative John Kerry as a special envoy to the WEF. Kerry is known to have attended at least ten WEF annual meetings since 2007 (including this year); and his former colleague Al Gore is a WEF Trustee. Upon his appointment to the post, Kerry remarked: “And yes, it [the Great Reset] will happen...and I think it will happen with greater speed and with greater intensity than a lot of people might imagine.” 

    Since the 2023 meeting, there has been considerable activity throughout the media. Here in the US, during the last two months alone, consider that:

    1. Top media figures Dan Bongino, Tucker Carlson, and Don Lemon have been removed from highly-rated shows.

    2. Congress is proposing the Restrict Act which will limit American access to foreign media sources.

    3. Media cartels such as Twitter are appointing more top executives with WEF connections. 

    4. Major auto makers---many of which are WEF-connected---are eliminating radios with AM bandwidth. AM radio in the US is largely political or religious programming. 

    5. Multiple lawsuits have been launched against news agencies, Fox News in particular, under shady pretenses of 'defamation.' 

    6. Several States---including Utah and Florida---have enacted legislation curbing the 1st Amendment.

    7. Vlogger David Marcello---a friend of our site who did deep exposures of Deep State crimes under the nom de plume of 'Davey Crocko' passed away under unexplained circumstances at the age of 36.

   8. Kiwi Farms---a forum that often engaged in and exposed frauds in social issues seems to vanished completely from the Internet during the last week with no explanation. 

   This is just within the US. Consider that in Canada, the iron grip that Tiananmen Trudeau has on freedom of speech and freedom of the press is getting worse than it already was. This past weekend, Trudeau's goons suppressed another lawful (for now) protest in British Columbia. Canada recently approved a Bill which subjects online content creators to regulation by a national bureaucracy. Copying an Australian law, Canada also approved legislation requiring payment for using links in an article. The Regime likewise has instituted a program to subsidize 'approved' alternative media (which loops back into the bill placing these media under government control). Although Soros-funded media 'watchdogs' and 'fact-checkers' rate Canada highly for Free Speech, many prominent Canadians have a different opinion. Like the US, independent Canadian news outlets have been disappearing rapidly after hostile Corporate takeovers.

    In Britain---and the Anglosphere in general---the revolting soft-ball coverage of King Charles' Coronation and the virtual silence over his WEF connections and support for the Great Reset hardly needs elaboration. Likewise, we heard little of the heavy-handed police actions against those hardy enough to protest the Royal Scam. Britain, Australia, and New Zealand were already instituting usurpations against Free Press and Free Speech before the Great Reset was announced. New Zealand's former PM, WEF Young Global Leader Jacinda Ardern imposed vile media restrictions after a Red Pill cultist went berserk in 2019 and shot up a Mosque. The Scamdemic accelerated crackdowns on Free Speech there as well as Australia and Britain. In fact, both the British and Canadian Militaries got caught red-handed running Scamdemic-related psyops in their respective Mainstream Media outlets. 

    The newest proposals by the WEF Oligarchs are clearly aimed at keeping any further such exposures from coming to light. Their purpose is essentially to create a massive echo-chamber where the Official Narrative becomes the Consensus. Debate over peripheral issues will still be allowed to give the illusion of discussion and discourse: but nothing allowed which will challenge 'stakeholders' bottom lines. 

    If we had an actual Conservative Party left in the United States, we would have an actual legislative push to break up these conglomerates controlling the flow of information and legislation strengthening 1st Amendment protections. Sadly, though, both parties are moving in the same direction: towards greater control and further restrictions. Likewise, there seems to be little or no interest among the American public to assert their Rights. Instead, what Conservatives seem to want are the same echo-chambers, but ones where they make the rules. That's not going to help anyone in the least. 

   

     

MEDIA MUSK-RATS AND A REALITY CHECK

       The Conservative Punditocracy is fuming again this morning; clutching their bow-ties and wailing that Elon Musk has appointed the Chairwoman of the WEF's Media Division as CEO of Twitter. What to say about this? How about "I told you so." 

     Written about a year ago, when these same talking-heads were predicting a "New Era in Free Speech" we told you right here that:

     "If Tesla and Space X are any indications of the Conservative trend that Twitter is supposedly going to take, we were probably better off under its old management. The examples above are specimens of the kinds of WEF shills, cringing Neocons, and Left-Wing crackpots that Musk is going appoint to the Board of Twitter---make no mistake about that. And there's little doubt that WEF banksters Blackrock and Morgan-Stanley---which combined hold more shares in Twitter than Musk---will have a lot to say about who does what. The Twitter takeover is no victory for the Right. It's business as usual posing as a victory."

   We do not appear here as gloating---TBH, I usually wish that such predictions would turn out to be wrong. Going against the Conservative Consensus isn't always easy, but facts are facts: and that is the point. 

   The Conservative Media today---especially the pundit/editorial class---is nothing but Controlled Opposition and people need to realize that. They're filling the American Right with disinformation and distraction, false hopes, scapegoating soft targets, and generally doing nothing constructive. They're successful because they're telling people what they want to hear; what they want to believe. Things like the 'Red Tsunami' 'Go Woke Go Broke' 'It's All China's Fault' etc. Then when their 'narrative' unravels: Musk sells out, McCarthy keeps control of Congress and starts bowing to Biden, Youngkin, Abbott, and DeSantis turn out to be RINOs---then 'Don't worry! We'll get 'em next time! People are waking up!'

   We need start getting a few things through our heads:

1. 2020 was a Color Revolution in the United States, and the Republican Party was complicit in carrying it out.

2. We are not going to vote our way out this, because the Electoral System is badly compromised.

3. Supranational Financial Cartels are controlling policy. As evidence of this consider that the WEF Top Agenda for 2020 was the Great Reset; for 2021, acceleration of Big Tech and transhumanism; for 2022, climate change and depopulation; and 2023, combatting so-called 'disinformation.' Every single one of these policies is being implemented. 

4. The President-in-Exile is not coming back.

5. Our current economic crisis is not leading to a 'crash' it is a controlled demolition of the Middle Class and designed to concentrate and consolidate more power in fewer hands. 

6. The crime, chaos in our cities, social disruption, and violence is part of a deliberate plan to create a climate of fear and instability to make the populace susceptible to an authoritarian government. Whether the strongman they select is a Democrat or Republican is a matter of indifference to the Oligarchs, since they will control him. 

    Statements like these are pooh-poohed as 'defeatism,' but nothing is going is going to change the fact that our side has very clearly already been defeated. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas once spoke of Points of Rebellion. Where are our Points of Rebellion supposed to come from? The schools and universities? The Media? Opposition parties? Business interests? The Military? The Legal System? The Churches? No: every one of these institutions is bought-and-paid-for at the highest levels, or soon will be. 

   What is the Republican Party plan for reversing the damage caused by 30+ years of dumbed-down, mind-numbing, politically-correct public schools? How are they going to deal with cities where bum jungles have higher populations than residential districts? What do they plan to do about our fertility rates crashing for the last 20+ years? How are they going to ensure free and transparent elections? What do they propose to do about the fact that a handful of banks have more control over the economy than the Government itself has? 

   The idea that the GOP is going to do anything; or that some 'Silent Majority' will rise up; or that 'Civil War 2.0' is imminent---all of these are illusions. 

   Well, then, someone might ask, what about solutions? The answer is that our problems are not insoluble and the Elites are not invincible. But the first thing to be done in solving any problem is to accept the reality that the problem exists. This is why we should be networking with other like-minded people, preparing ourselves for potential problems, stop playing into the social division and paranoia that's being disseminated, take a stand and call out these frauds whenever possible. Above all, we need to stop wasting valuable time and resources when we could be organizing by listening to phonies on the fake Right who sell us false promises. 

INVASION USA

     Last night, Title 42, another totally illegal series of restrictions imposed during the Scamdemic, expired. Title 42 dealt specifically with immigration, and resulted in backlogging processing of immigrant visas to the US for nearly three years. One would think that Conservatives would applaud the end of such an egregious act of Government overreach and be thankful that the INS is actually functioning again. One would think so, but the 'Conservative' of today isn't quite what the Conservative of a few years ago was.

    The Op-ed pages and press during the last 24 hours hasn't seen this level of panic and paranoia since a Chinese weather-balloon blew off course in February. For the last several months, we have here been exposing all of this anti-immigration rhetoric as a tissue of hoaxes, hysteria, and political grandstanding---mostly instigated by xenophobic fanatics and anti-Catholic bigots. There's no need in reciting all of the statistics and deep-dives on the subject again: anyone interested can search the blog archives for themselves; though, as is typical with subjects covered here, for all the good it did, they may as well have never been written at all. The Postmodern Right is as obsessed with building a Maginot Line on the Mexican Border as the Whacko Left is with planting a Rainbow Flag on top the Kremlin. 

     We've probably seen the term 'invasion' in the press more times this week than our grandparents saw on D-Day. I wish that these 'Conservatives' would worry a little more about things like widespread invasion of privacy being carried out by our government and their bosses in Big Tech. Or, if they're worried specifically about foreign invasions, maybe they should focus on things like the influence of foreign economic cartels like the WEF; or foreign ownership of US stocks, or maybe banning foreign lobbying. That seems a little higher priority than picking on people who cut lettuce and wash dishes.

    That hasn't stopped politicians from jumping into the debate and proposing many distinctly un-Conservative measures. Like Senator John Kennedy, who demands military action against Mexico (the fact that Mexico has huge oil reserves and Kennedy is on the hook to oil interests, we're certain has nothing to do with his position). Kennedy is worried about narcotics supposedly being smuggled across the border, maybe he should instead demand reinstating Trump's successful programs which led to reductions in Fentanyl overdoses for three consecutive years. 

   Then we have George Bush's handpicked successor as Texas Governor, Greg Abbott and Jeb's boy, Ron DeSantis in Florida. These two characters famously opposed Soros' migrant caravans---not by bringing any action against Soros---but by setting up migrant caravans of their own and dumping human beings out of state. Abbott has declared a 'state of emergency' to defend the Scamdemic Title 42 policy, and sent military forces to the border. That shouldn't be surprising, considering how eagerly he and other Conservative governors embraced the abuses of power under the phony 'health emergency,' but we digress. DeSantis, meanwhile, has passed through his rump legislature a bill expanding his powers to deport people and such Conservative ideals as mandating ID cards and requiring hospitals and churches to act as government informants. DeSantis also has thrown a version of the Chinese Exclusion Act into the mix. 

   Unilateral military actions; border walls; militarized police; government domestic espionage; mass deportations; restrictions on private property rights; criminalizing churches---all for the crime of seeking freedom and employment opportunities. Let's all hope that these are Conservative Values enough!

      It doesn't seem to have dawned on any of these yukks that a government willing to employ tactics like these against one group wouldn't hesitate to employ them against other groups---maybe even theirs. Experience with both Bush Administrations should have taught the American Right that fact. We were told back then how we needed enhanced domestic espionage to keep us safe. We just weren't told that included collecting private e-mails, no-fly lists, and lists of legal gun owners. Or how we needed extrajudicial police: we saw how well that worked out during Hurricane Katrina when relief workers were threatened with arrest and American citizens were subject to beatings and unlawful detention by private contractors. Just like the Ancient Greeks used to say of the Trojans: the American Right never learns until it's too late.

     Another thing most of these people conveniently overlook is the source of all of this anti-immigrant hysteria. Many of the philanthropic NGOs fanning all of this foolishness were founded by a character named John Tanton, who died in 2019. Aside from being a White Supremacist, Tanton also held high-ranking positions in the Sierra Club, where he promoted the Climate-Change hoax; as well as Planned Parenthood and Zero Population Growth. Tanton was also a great supporter of Bush's Real ID program and other forms of domestic espionage. I suppose that Tanton should get some credit at least for not pretending that there's any actual truth to the so-called Left-Right Paradigm, but it also illustrates the ideology driving the hatred of immigrants. Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, Sr. were two of Tanton's major financial backers in founding the Federation for American Immigration Reform. It isn't as though the connection between anti-immigration and global depopulation wasn't already obvious.

     Specimen of Tanton's Conservative Family Values: “Do we leave it to individuals to decide that they are the intelligent ones who should have more kids? And more troublesome, what about the less intelligent, who logically should have less? Who is going to break the bad news [to less intelligent individuals], and how will it be implemented?”

   Specimen of Tanton's Views on the Role of Faith in Society: "The Roman Catholic Church [and] several of the Protestant denominations, the Lutheran Church in particular, are among our opponents. One of the problems with churches is that they see themselves as universal, and as transcending national boundaries."

   It's no argument to pretend that the 'woke' Corporatists pay lip-service to supporting immigration. While it is true that they lobby to carve out exemptions for themselves---especially in the Tech Sector---WEF Strategic Partners Microsoft and Palantir (as well as the shady Deep State firms Booz Allen Hamilton and the GEO Group) all get fat exclusive contracts for outsourced immigration enforcement. Investment in Microsoft stocks seems to be very much a bipartisan issue as well. 

  The so-called 'immigration crisis' amounts to that: a cash-cow for opportunistic politicians and a useful public distraction for the Financial Interests which profit off both sides and laugh in their sleeves. Don't fall for it. 

   

     

TEACHER APPRECIATION WEEK

     Yesterday, according to a notification from Google, this week is National Teacher Appreciation Week. It seems a bit ironic; given the rates of illiteracy, childhood/teen suicide and addiction, gender dysphoria, and violence proliferating our schools that we should have a week dedicated to this. It feels a bit like expressing appreciation to the Japanese for attacking Pearl Harbor. 

     For some inexplicable reason, the American public operates under the delusion that our educational system is above any criticism. This lack of any oversight or accountability has produced an administrative class rife with corruption and ideological fanaticism. I suspect that there are many reasons for this indifference.

   1. Many parents actually hate their kids;

   2. Many parents were too doped-up in school to remember how bad it was, and are still too doped-up to think about what their kids are going through;

   3. Many parents erroneously believe that the brutality and injustice that children receive prepares them with coping skills for adult life in postmodern America. (Sadly, there's some truth in this, but it's very perverse logic);

   

        Besides 1st Grade in a very small town, I was fortunate enough to escape most of the Living Hell that is public school. I did also attend a larger public school during 4th, 5th, and 6th Grade. I remember learning nothing in 4th Grade. 5th Grade arguably was one of the worst experiences of my life. We had two teachers: both Lesbians who made no secret of their hatred for boys and engaged in some grooming of the girls. Boys were beaten for the slightest offense. They used to take us out in the hallway and scream accusations at us by turns (like Gestapo interrogations in movies). One kid got his mouth duct-taped shut for loaning another a crayon. Every day one poor slob would get singled out for especial gaslighting and torture; and any student who showed any compassion for them got piled on too.

     I recall going "out in the hall" once because, as I was informed, a relative wanted a teacher conference to see why my grades were slipping and I feared going to school (both of which weren't normal me). We had to stand at full position-of-attention in front of these two bitches---at least one of whom carried a wooden paddle that they never hesitated to use on us. Even though I knew nothing about it, I got the full enhanced interrogation as to what I might have been saying out of class and given a warning to "remember that you have to come back here and face us, so it had better go well"---which I actually felt was getting off lightly. 

   In 6th Grade, the teachers really never did anything; they picked out the biggest bullies in the class and let them run things while they went off somewhere. I remember the kid who sat next to me used to deal drugs out of his desk, and pay the bullies a cut. If anybody got too disruptive for the bullies to handle, the teachers would take them to a small room at the end of the hall and beat them with a radiator hose---which was kind of clever of them since hoses rarely leave marks. I still remember a teacher coming in during the middle of class and announcing in front of us all that one girl was going to have to leave because her mother had just committed suicide. That was how that poor kid got the news. 

  These are the kinds of human scum that we're supposed to 'appreciate.' In my case, a Merciful Providence intervened and I got an opportunity to escape to a private boarding school. In the long run, my experience with public schools instilled a lifelong hatred of injustice and abusers of authority. In the short term though, I suffered from chronic insomnia, recurring nightmares, and a tendency for my arm to tremble or go numb in stressful situations, which took a few years to recover from. 

   Today, most schools (on paper at least) don't allow Corporal Punishment, but the bullying, gaslighting, and psychological abuse has gotten even worse. Many of those who actually pay attention have noticed that most postmodern schools are structured like prisons, complete with armed guards, metal detectors, humiliating searches, disregard for human rights, mass surveillance, lockdowns, etc. The situation has only worsened during the Scamdemic and the wake of considerable Media hype about mass-shootings.

   We're all familiar (one hopes anyway) with the abysmal failure of our public schools to achieve any of their stated purposes of actually educating anyone or preparing young people to become responsible participants in a self-governing society. We also are (or should be) well aware that all manner of radicalist propaganda is imposed on young minds and conformity to agendas rigidly enforced. And this is the where the real problem lies: it is categorically impossible that Americans are unaware of the problems---either the abuse or the failures or the corruption that is happening in plain sight of everybody. It's actually so bad that some within our much-maligned immigrant community residing on the Southern Border actually enroll their kids in Mexican schools and hire a bus driver to send them to school and back. I've actually known fathers here who've moved back with their families to countries like Nicaragua and Iraq for the sake of their children and concern over the conditions of the schools here. In fact, contrary to xenophobic 'Conservative' propaganda, Moslems are among the fastest-growing homeschooled population. 

     Unfortunately, our spiritless native-born population hasn't the will to make and enforce necessary changes. The Left is in complete denial that anything is wrong with the system, and chooses instead to throw more tax money at the system and write paranoid editorials about school shootings and 'extremism'. The Right is in denial too, and imagines that harsher discipline and imposing ideology will solve everything. Meanwhile, the system goes along on its merry way; churning out conformists, ignoramuses, neurotics, and addicts while the School Administrators roll around in the loot and laugh up their sleeves at the chumps who maintain their operations.

        What can be done? For most of us, not much. The US (for now anyway) still has lenient homeschooling and alternative schooling laws, so parents should take advantage of those. On a larger scale, there's no popular nor political will to do anything. What really needs to be done is what Bill Bennett suggested 30+ years ago: burn the whole system to the ground and start over---even if that means importing educators from countries with schools that actually function. Not that that's actually going to happen, but it's the best suggestion so far. Instead what will happen is the usual finger-pointing, a few superficial changes here and there, and American parents will go back to their drugs, infotainment, and blissful denial.

    

    

   

OF CORNBALLS AND CORONATIONS

       This weekend, the entire Anglosphere is agog over Chuck Mountbatten's Official  Coronation as High Imperial Potentate of the English-Speaking World by God's Grace or some other nonsense. Our nominal Head-of-State sent his spouse along with Chuck's WEF partner John Kerry to attend, as well as a couple of Hollywood figures from American Idol to perform. WEF Young Global Leaders Emmanuel Macron and Tiananmen Trudeau also dropped by. 

     As at the time his mom died, Chuck's ascension to the Royal Throne met with some protesters who were viciously beaten and hauled off to jail by uniformed thugs. Charles' treatment of protesters hasn't quite reached the levels of Trudeau and Macron yet; but at least he's showing a determination to uphold 21st-Century standards of intolerance towards Free Speech. 

    I think that most regular readers already know my feelings towards 'kings'. The only 'coronation' that most of these Royal Majesties deserve is done with a good 18-inch steel blade. That aside, however, today's spectacle falls a week ahead of another of the West's now-meaningless shows: Birthing Persons 'Mothers' Day. But I'll bet there's one famous mom that nobody will be talking about:

     Diana Spencer---for those who graduated high school since the 21st began---was King Chuck's first wife. The Anglosphere media vermin made a huge deal out of the Royal Wedding; portraying it as a fairy-tale romance of sorts. The reality of course was much different. Diana was a shy, sheltered, and impressionable 19-year old at the time of her marriage; the daughter of a deeply dysfunctional family of minor aristocracy which barely held on to its titles because of generations of slavish fawning to Buckingham Palace. Charles married her mostly for political reasons: he needed a 'royal heir' as Papa and Mama Mountbatten were getting along in years, and Diana was the only eligible candidate in British aristocratic circles who was naive enough not to know of his character and avoid him. 

    Charles managed to generate enough testosterone to sire two kinglets, but the marriage wasn't a happy one for Diana. Despite being born into an inbred family and her sheltered upbringing, Diana nonetheless grew into an attractive, reasonably intelligent, and genuinely good-hearted woman. It wasn't long before she was disgusted with her husband's boorishness, latent homosexuality, habitual duplicity, and---above all it seemed---his refusal to do anything to protect her from the rapacity of the British tabloid press. Diana was not at all by nature a person who craved publicity and the constant hounding of the British Media literally drove her nearly insane. 

   Diana finally divorced Chuck---prince or no prince---and left the country in 1996. The following year, she died under highly suspicious circumstances after a car accident in Paris. Even polls today show that nearly 2/5 of Britons don't believe the Official Narrative of an accidental death. The fact that the Royal Inquest was literally prohibited from returning a verdict of Murder certainly raised questions about the transparency of the investigation. Even that rigged jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing (whatever that means) and the British Establishment Media has since dropped any discussion of the subject like a hot potato. A 2011 documentary titled Unlawful Killing was banned throughout the British Commonwealth and shadow-banned by American media distribution cartels. 

  Among other anomalies, she was taken from car alive but injured and not sent to the hospital for another 40 minutes and the ambulance drove her there at the speed of about 25 MPH. CCTV footage of the crash was confiscated and it was later revealed that the Royal Terrorist organization British Intelligence Service was spying on Diana up to the moment of the alleged accident. A French inquest concluded that the car Diana was riding in collided with another vehicle in the tunnel, but the other car or driver have never been found. It was also concluded that Diana's chauffeur was legally intoxicated although the report likewise has disappeared. 

   Before her divorce and subsequent death, Charles was gaslighting Diana aggressively; and she confided to her servants that she believed that he intended to have her murdered or committed to an insane asylum. The servants were called to testify at the Inquest, but no doubt being warned of the consequences, deferred the matter to Diana's attorney, who was also a nobleman. The attorney gave testimony to Scotland Yard, which dismissed it as 'unsubstantiated.' A few years later, however, the attorney discovered a hand-written note among Diana's effects which specifically mentioned "arranging a car accident." Richard Tomlinson, a whistleblower who was thrown in jail by Tony Blair for exposing the British Government's crimes, stated that  "he knew for a fact that her driver on the night she died, Henri Paul, was an MI6 informant. He claimed that her death mirrored plans he saw in 1992 for the assassination of Yugoslav President Milosevic using a bright light to cause a traffic accident."

   Charles went on to marry the more mannish and domineering Camilla Ferguson---evidently a match more to his tastes. But I certainly have doubts that if one of us little people had abused his spouse to the degree that Charles did, and she died in a suspicious accident shortly after the divorce, any of us would have gotten media and police to look the other way to the extent that these Royals managed to do. As if this wasn't bad enough, being a known spousal abuser and suspected killer is only a fraction of Charles' suspected crimes. 

      The postmodern sycophants of British Royalty can hoot all they want to; let's see how hard they laugh when this fiend really starts flexing his royal muscles. 

    "So what do we do? Without doubt we must now put ourselves on a war-like footing, approaching our action from the perspective of a military-style campaign. That way, working together we can combat this most grave and urgent challenge. If we have the resolve to shift our trajectory we must start now, by bringing forward our net zero target.”---Charles, commenting on the Great Reset at the 2020 WEF Forum. For a comprehensive look at all of the other pies that Charles has his fingers in, this article is one of the most thorough. 

   It is truly a sad commentary on the state of our culture when we actually admire crowned degenerates like this. I wish that I could say that it was a uniquely Leftist phenomenon, but unfortunately there's no shortage of meatheads on the so-called Right who like the idea of bringing kings back (naturally of course they would be the aristocracy). As far as I'm concerned, they're all a bunch of throwbacks to same kinds of Tory scum that our Founding Fathers had to deal with. Authoritarianism, whatever its stripe, is not a step forward.

   

   

   

I HATE THE MEDIA

      Donald Trump, the President-in-Exile, once said that the American News Media is a "national disgrace." It truly is that. The overwhelming majority of the news outlets today are so completely under the thumb of Corporate special interests whose relationship with lawmakers and regulators is so seamless that we may as well have a State Ministry of Propaganda and Culture. Like our elections, however, the Oligarchy prefers maintaining an illusion of choice; even offering us Controlled Opposition outlets. There really is no choice. Just as our last 'Red Wave' Congress gifted Obama with a repeal of the Anti-Propaganda Act of 1948; our current crop of RINOs is working overtime to hand the Biden/Harris Junta the so-called Restrict Act to control our sources of information even further. 

    The main purpose of the contemporary American Media is to create distraction, spread propaganda, and sow fear and division. Yes, there are occasionally accurate stories in the press: I'm certain that even during the Third Reich one could get reliable information about road conditions, weather forecasts, and sports scores. But they also got an agenda sold to them and that's essentially what we get too. Basically, what today's news comes down to is marketing; selling ideas that increase the power and profit of those interests controlling the press. 

   The Media's coverage of crime stories is a case in point of how subtly this agenda-promotion is played out. "If it bleeds, it leads," the motto of cynical editors everywhere, gives Americans the impression that violent crime is ubiquitous---even though by the UN's own numbers, only two US cities even make the list of top 25 most violent cities. That's not to say that crime isn't a problem in the US; but mostly our problems stem from the less-glamorous violent bum jungles and organized gangs committing property crimes and assaults (which our politicians of both parties do nothing about); and that suicides and narcotics overdoses are responsible for most of the non-natural or non-disease related deaths here. The Whacko Left Wing's response is to defund the police and legalize vagrancy, euthanasia, and drugs: the Right's response is to pretend that such problems only happen in 'Blue States.' 

   The Mainstream Media also makes it a point to bury details of stories when they reflect badly on the Junta's constituents. We've all seen it: whenever some horrific crime is perpetrated by a minority, his identity is withheld until trolls have flooded every comment section blaming it on a white male Christian Trump-supporter. When a White does commit it; they post his picture but censor the Internet of all of his social media accounts---because the majority of the time, it's some Left-Wing kook or homo activist responsible. The trolls achieve the same effect.

   Lately the MSM has been running the same interference for the Gay Mafia. The fact that that demographic has throughout history has had disproportional representation among violent criminals (especially towards women and children) is why dead White males considered it an antisocial mental disorder. The Media would just as soon that we forgot some of that science and passively accept the New Normal. 

   A case in point happened in Connecticut lately. In spite of considerable bumbling from local law enforcement, one of America's longest-standing unidentified homicide victims got her name back; thanks largely to the efforts of her sister who had been searching for her missing sibling.

   The MSM story concluded by saying that "investigators are still searching for Patricia Newsom’s killer." What they conveniently leave out is that they've had a suspect since her body was found in 1975: a convicted killer named Glenn Askeborn who died in prison last year. There was considerable circumstantial evidence tying Askeborn to the crime; and since Patricia has been identified, even more corroborating evidence has surfaced. This BTW, includes the recent discovery that Patricia ran away from a girls' home with a friend---whose identity and current whereabouts are also unknown.  

   Why did Askeborn's name drop from the story? Well, it happens that he was an out and proud member of the LGBTQ Community. He was in fact a troon who disguised as a female and went by the name of 'Samantha Glenner.' Just like the recent transsexual Nashville shooter---whose 'manifesto' has never been made public---certain interests would rather sweep such details under the rug. 

   Disgusting as this kind of journalistic chicanery is, it's certainly not the first time that editors (and even police agencies) have scrambled all of their resources to keep any mention of 'orientation' out of the official story. In fact, it's not even the first time it's happened in a high-profile Cold Case. 

   When discussing the MSM, we're probably not telling anybody anything new. Leftist activists are always going to do what they habitually do: stoop to the lowest levels to promote their sick agendas. However, this brings us to a real problem.

   What about the 'Conservative' Media?

    Yesterday, most of my newsfeed was flooded with story after story about the horrible mass-murder in San Jacinto, Texas. It's not that it wasn't a major news story: the troubling thing from my perspective was that nearly every headline from a 'Conservative' source took great pains to point out that the suspect was an immigrant. In fact, just like the Liberal Media goes out of its way to magnify any incident of criminality committed by anyone even tangentially connected to the political Right while downplaying any criminality among their own base; it seems that the Controlled Opposition 'Conservative' Press has adopted the same tactic. The San Jacinto Case is an extreme example, but it's not at all uncommon that any crime committed by an immigrant makes the news on the Right, in spite of the fact that the native-born population far exceeds immigrants in terms of criminal behavior. 

   Texas Governor Greg Abbott, whose subservience to the Alt-Right agenda is so pronounced that he's recently offered a pardon to a convicted murderer upon demands from that sector, recently threw further gasoline on the fire by bringing both the victims' and the suspect's immigration status into the debate. How is this any different from the Left's exploitation of violence to agitate for gun control?

    The sad fact is that it's no different. Those of us who grew up in the Reagan Era may recall that the Conservative Media of the day once consisted of erudite and dignified figures like William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, and Louis Rukeyser who challenged the fallacies of the Left in open debate and routinely toppled their arguments. In spite of a hostile news media during the 1980s, Ronald Reagan managed to carry 45 and 49 states respectively in two elections. He didn't accomplish this by trying to own the libtards by mimicking their sleazy behavior; nor by pandering to whack-jobs who think that they're part of a super-race and that White Sharia is an acceptable form of government. 

    Unfortunately, too, trying to explain any of this to the Postmodern NPC Right is about as fruitless as trying to explain the stupidity of Left-Wing pundits to an average Liberal. I know, I've tried. Gauge the intelligence and general character of the 21st Century Right by these kinds of responses:

    

   We're reading in 'thoughts' like these the end result of years of dumbing-down the Conservative Media to the level of the Liberal MSM. If they actually had any sort of education, they would realize that the aforementioned President Reagan signed an Amnesty Law into effect in 1987. "In many ways, amnesty was a success story — it gave millions of people the legal status they required to have a better life. It even turned a $100 million profit for the government (through the fees it charged applicants). And while immigration restrictionists still claim that amnesty encouraged more undocumented immigrants to come, studies show the opposite: amnesty produced a decline in the number of illegal entries into the country."

    "Studies show that those who legalized saw their wages go up by 20%, they were also more likely to get a higher education and become homeowners," according to a follow-up survey done by the El Paso Times.

   Republican Senator Alan Simpson, who sponsored the legislation, wrote: “The work to be done is to avoid seeing this nation populated with a furtive illegal subclass of human beings who are afraid to go to the cops, afraid to go to a hospital…or afraid to go to their employer. If we do not choose to have immigration reform in the near future, the alternative will not just be the status quo. No, the alternative instead will be an increased public intolerance — a failure of compassion, if you will — toward all forms of immigration and types of entrants.” Imagine a Republican Senator saying anything like that today. But that's what Conservatism used to sound like.

   This is why the Conservative movement of today is failing. Both in its methods and its message, it has become indistinguishable from the Far Left; except that the Right seems to aspire to be more ruthlessly vicious rulers and more accomplished liars than their so-called opposition. “When it comes to the most important things in life, you should toss civility aside and fight for what’s right with everything you have,” as Rabbi Dr. Ari Lamm, another yo-yo who passes for an intellectual among today's Right, opined in the Moonie-run media outlet, Newsweek. Well, we see how well that strategy has worked since Reagan's time.