STRIKING OUT

    Following the non-story of this year's earlier threatened Railway Strike, two other unions: Hollywood's Writers' Guild of America, and the United Auto Workers are striking this week. The first of these, I hope never comes back: for Hollywood to fold would be a national blessing and they haven't had any decent screenwriters in decades anyway. As for the auto workers, like the railway workers earlier, the biggest news to me was that either industry was still unionized. 

    Unions today are something of a quaint relic of a day and age when working men were still presumed to have rights. Even farmers were unionized in some States. Today, Hollywood, Teachers' Unions, and Pro Sports Unions are about the only significant ones left in the US; and in those cases, the very organization set up to protect the financial interests of their professions are controlled by the industry itself. The same is true to a great extent of Government Employees' Unions, though in that case, it's used mostly to encourage nepotism and ensure a base loyal workers to political agendas. 

   It shouldn't come as any major surprise that the US is at the near-bottom of OECD countries when it comes to unionized labor (the bottom position is held by our Deep State colony, South Korea). During the Bush-Clinton Era, both parties sold out organized labor, and ever since, labor unions have become something of a nostalgic symbol---like clean streets, nuclear families, small businesses, and home ownership---of a great society that once was. 

   

    

    The rise of Neoconservatism and faux-Libertarianism within the Republican Party has anathematized labor unions to a great extent. One would think that a system that strengthened families and ensured high quality workmanship would appeal to Conservatives, but these days, it doesn't. That's not to argue that Democrats and Liberals care much about the working class either. Today, the Left's idea of 'supporting workers' is to raise minimum wages and eligibility for food stamps by a few cents. The Right's idea of supporting workers is telling us to work harder for less money and stop drinking Bud Light. 

    In the relatively small community where I was born, there were two large industries: a cannery and a railroad---both were unionized. A Neocon talking-point is that unions hurt small businesses. On the contrary: small businesses were flourishing back then. When a community has a minority of highly-paid skilled workers, small businesses are needed to support that infrastructure. Retailers, grocers, diners, garages, gas stations, etc. were everywhere. The small, family farms depended too upon access to the cannery and rail transport; and there were plenty of businesses selling farm equipment and supplies as well. Today, that entire county is a blot on society, the towns have about 1/3-1/10 of their former populations. Big Ag has taken over, and there's literally nothing there other than corn, soybeans, and Meth. In some of the smaller towns, the population in cemeteries outnumber the actual living residents, and some of the even smaller towns are altogether gone.  

    

     It also doesn't seem to dawn on many on the Right that Organized Labor would have been one of the most effective means of preventing the rise of Woke Capitalism, outsourcing to corrupt and dubiously-governed countries, and supranational globalist cabals like the WEF or the Gates Foundation. The much-ballyhooed consumer boycotts don't even make a dent in these Corporate looters' bottom-lines or their ideological commitments. A nationwide walkout, accompanied by other sympathetic unions---that would get their attention. It used to be too, that many unions retirement funds were tied to the stocks of the companies they worked for; hence the workers actually had a voice on the Boards of Directors and it's unlikely that any of the ESG woke nonsense would have seen the light of day in the first place. 

     The Controlled Opposition claims that Organized Labor infringes on the now non-existent free market and impairs the ability of Wall Street freebooters to turn a profit for their 'stakeholders.' Actually that is a variation of the same position that the Whacko Left holds; although they marginally include employees as 'stakeholders.' It's certainly not an anti-Conservative position for Labor and Capital to engage in things like Free Association and negotiating contracts between them. 

   The Neocons and fake Libertarians like to cast Organized Labor as self-serving and motivated by envy of their Corporate Overlords. This narrative is part of the Strategy of Tension that the Oligarchs pay politicians to promote to sow division among the general population. The Corporate/Deep State Cabal isn't committed to any ideology other than to maintain themselves in power. To the Right, they're portrayed as an antipode to Communism: If the Left claims that capitalist exploitation of the farmers and workers of the world is killing them, then the Official Counter-Narrative says that Capitalists producing value is the only thing keeping the farmers and workers of the world alive. Meanwhile, the Whacko Left holds the Official Narrative, that Capitalists are increasingly becoming woke and socially aware; and thus their vast concentrations of wealth and power ultimately work for the benefit of mankind. The Crony Capitalists win either way: with the Right in power, they get a free pass to loot the economy unabated; with the Left in power, they spend on social engineering schemes with one hand while getting their money back (with interest) in subsidies, tax breaks, and government contracts. 

    Unfortunately, today, most Americans have little respect for---and even less interest in---honest work of any kind; hence the idea of workers actually having rights is a concept that they can't readily support. The traditional view of a unionized blue-collar American workingman holding a productive job and maintaining a home and family doesn't set well with would-be Social Engineers on the Left; nor does the notion of such workers standing up to arbitrary authority appeal to many on the Right.

      If American workers learned that their Corporate Masters are dependent on them---and not the other way around---it would follow logically that this same class would not be especially tolerant of overbearing and arrogant Government bureaucrats either; since the latter is also dependent upon the productive class for its tax-base. That kind of 'wokeness' is what the Oligarchy really fears; so it keeps the population divided with meaningless political stunts or distracted into a stupor of permanent apathy with narcotics, voyeuristic sexual titillation, and environmental toxins. 

    

      

   

THE SCHMEXPERTS SAY, 'STOP CHINA NOW!'

   An old colleague of mine used to have a nickname for a certain class of pompous blowhards which he termed schmexperts. In small towns and rural areas, schmexperts can be found on most barstools, which is a second home for many of them. In cities and college towns, schmexperts are like gadflies in coffee houses, hookah-lounges, and generally anywhere an audience can be ginned up. A schmexpert is an 'expert' on anything---just ask one and he'll tell you so himself. 

   In recent years, many of this type manages to get a college degree or two (which in this day and age isn't especially difficult), and hire themselves out to interested parties who promote them because they have one necessary skill: the ability to sound as though they know what they are talking about. If they can add titles before, or initials after, their names and belong to some pretentious-sounding think-tank so much the better. Their track-record for accuracy is usually quite pathetic; but these days, that doesn't matter, since owning the narrative is the important thing. In a culture where the ability to think critically is a lost art, men who once would have been nothing but obnoxious bar-flies in less exceptional times can now make a handsome living running their mouths in the Corporate Media. 

   And some say the American Dream is dead...

      In Postmodern American Culture, the pundit serves a broad sociopolitical purpose much the same way that Artificial Intelligence is employed for more mundane tasks: it is a substitute for the necessity of thinking. Often, pundits can be quite dangerous because they lend the air of authority to absurd schemes which frequently end in disaster. 

    Unfortunately, Conservatives are not immune to heeding schmexperts; in fact, they seem to be multiplying on our side like toadstools. One of the most appalling examples came out today in article titled Xi's Leadership is in Crisis: Now is the Time to Act, which basically is chiding the Democrats for being weenies and not engaging China militarily. Aside from the fact that our Pentagon couldn't fight its way out of a paper sack if it had to, the article reads like it was written by two insular academics who don't realize that Chairman Mao died in 1976 and that China has changed since then. This shouldn't be surprising, since the co-authors are both connected to the shady Center for Security Policy---an organization founded by arch-Neocon Frank Gaffney and whose membership reads about like the roll-call of a Bush Machine fundraiser. Current and past members include Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearle, John Bolton, and John Kyl; and a host of their lesser-known flunkies. Their current head of Military Policy is Gen. Paul Vallely, one of the architects of the Pentagon's Psyop Program along with Satanic Cult leader, Col. Michael Aquino.

   The authors state that "there is a growing body of evidence that indicates the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is in freefall. {Query: what evidence?} If true, this makes Xi Jinping more dangerous as it increases the likelihood of an attack against Taiwan. It also means Xi’s regime, the CCP, is extremely vulnerable to pressure from America, and the rest of the free world, to evict them from power."

   In the first paragraph, they demonstrate their complete ignorance of Chinese politics. Yes, Xi has some opposition within the Party, but the Communist Party Constitution reads: "Party Members have a right to make a statement of reservation and present their views to a Party organization at a higher level, up to and including the Central Committee, in case of disagreement with a Party resolution or policy, on the condition that they resolutely implement the resolution or policy in question while it is in force." This means in substance---and this is a point made throughout their governing document---that the cohesion of the Party is above any personal interest. The authors make the ignorant assumption that the Communists operate like the DNC or RNC does in the US; where personal vendettas and intrigues are not only tolerated but encouraged. Pressure from America is actually strengthening the Party, as anybody who bothers to read a Chinese News source can see for themselves. 

   Polls in China currently are favorable to engaging Taiwan and it's actually been the Party which is showing restraint. Their reasoning is that Taiwan is a valuable economic entity, and China would rather have it join voluntarily and intact than have the Peoples' Liberation Army move in and destroy half the island. Xi didn't deploy the PLA during the recent Soros-backed attempted Color Revolution in Hong Kong for the same reason. 

   The authors' whole premise in playing the Taiwan Card is disingenuous anyway. If Xi is as unstable as they imagine; if the Chinese economy really is near collapse; and the Chinese people really were looking for an opportunity to revolt---why would he engage in a major military operation which would precipitate all of these calamities? 

   "Xi and the CCP face a deeper problem than the lasting economic downturn in China and myriad of social problems the Chinese regime confronts—problems that cannot be papered over by Xi’s prominence at the BRICS meeting or at any other international fora." This is a complete lie; because the Chinese economic 'downturn' is not even close to an economic collapse. Their economy 'slowed down' to a growth rate that is still 2-3 times higher than ours, even with the fudged numbers of Bidenomics 'experts,' and production in many sectors has recovered. What 'myriad of social problems' the authors are referring to is anybody's guess. 

   For the next six paragraphs, the authors state that China's problem is that it has a Communist Government, and it's really tedious reading. It sounds like a cut-and-paste text from a 1950s documentary about the Iron Curtain countries, but nothing even remotely relevant to China then---or now. 

   As further proof that these two 'experts' have never even read the Communist Party of China's Constitution, they spout that  "Xi is destined to fail so long as China is ruled by an imported Western ideology—communism. The Chinese people have recognized that to accept communism in China requires the rejection of China’s political principles of unity, dynastic government, avoidance of chaos, and respect for the people as a foundation for China’s polity. A Chinese polity requires the acceptance of the traditional political system and the rejection of imported ideologies." The Chinese Constitution relates in many places that their intention is to pursue a form of Marxism suited to Chinese culture and circumstances. For example, China recognizes the authority of the family, and their Social Services have less power to intervene in a family than any American State's agencies do. They have socialized medicine which also covers Traditional Chinese Medicine (Obamacare does not). 

  One of the authors, Bradley Thayer, in fact, is a staff-writer at the Epoch Times, a publication run by the Falun Gong cult. Cultish propaganda is evident in statements like: "What Xi’s problems should mean for the Biden administration is that this is the right time to put pressure on the CCP and allow the people of China to evict them from power. Working with the Chinese people and diaspora, the U.S., its allies, and people of goodwill throughout the world should call attention to Xi’s abuses and misrule... That is the best way to save the Chinese people from tyranny and avoid the path to a major crisis or war on which Xi has placed the world. It would save countless lives of civilians in the region and of American Sailors, Soldiers, Airman, and Marines." US intervention in China is something that both of these cults have promoted for decades. The cultish language again appears at the conclusion of their tome: "It is likely that the Biden administration will not do this as it would be a heresy to their religion of engagement with the PRC and their acceptance of the legitimacy of the CCP."  

   It should be noted that the Falun Gong are very similar to the Moonie Cult in that they worship their leader as a false messiah, and teach that Communism is represented under the satanic motifs referenced in the Book of Revelation. They were banned in China in 1999, and since have been received as great heroes by the US Deep State. Much of their vast wealth comes from the taxpayer-subsidized WEF/CIA cutout, the National Endowment for Democracy. The Corporate Media (also heavily funded by NED) takes great pains to smear anyone who exposes the cult. Falun Gong today is headquartered in a highly secretive compound just north of the City of New York. They've been granted tax exemptions by the State and seem to enjoy many other hands-off privileges by governments at all levels.

    The co-author, James Fanell, is a retired Naval Intelligence Officer who works at the Center for Security Policy's branch in Geneva, Switzerland. Two other members of that organization, Johanna Ralston-Lamb, and Nayef Al-Rodhan are World Economic Forum members---the latter of whom was "in 2017,was named amongst the Top 100 geostrategists in the World, and in 2022, was named as one of the Top 50 influential researchers whose work could shape 21st-century politics and policy." Some of the Center's top corporate funding sources include defense contractors Raytheon, General Dynamics, Northrup-Grumman, General Electric, Lockheed-Martin, and Boeing, the latter two of which are contributing partners to the WEF. The current Chairman of the Center for Security Policy is Miles Prentice, a multimillionaire attorney, "a partner at the law firm Eaton & Van Winkle LLP where his specialty is international and domestic commercial and financial law. His Eaton profile says he has extensive experience in the 'acquisition of companies, formation of joint enterprises, transfers of technology, financings (through the public markets and privately, including asset and project-based financings) and general operations.'"

    It's certainly interesting how these same shady characters and the same questionable organizations always seem to turn up in the same places with identical narratives, does it not? 

    These two authors seem to be laboring under the further delusion that the Chinese people can't wait to overthrow their Government and be 'liberated' like the former Iron Curtain and Russia was during the 1990s---as if the Chinese people hadn't seen governments subordinated to the US Deep State; the massive corporate looting and cultural degeneracy that was imported into Russia under Yeltsin; the anti-American protests occurring on a regular basis in Eastern Europe---sure, the Chinese desperately would love to see that repeated in their own country. 

    As we saw at the recent BRICS and ASEAN Summits, people not only in China but all across the globe are looking at China as a defender of their countries against the cultural, economic, and military exploitation of the Wall Street freebooters currently running our own nation and culture into the ground. Their schemes for a 'Great Reset' where a significant portion of China's 1 1/2 billion people is slated for genocide depopulation while the rest work in sweatshops to maintain the grandeur of Western financial Oligarchs probably doesn't appeal to the Chinese either. 

    On top of their ignorance of China, the authors demonstrate a profound ignorance of History. "A feature of Communism," they proclaim, "is that no ruler is secure." Apparently they've forgotten that Stalin, the Kim Jong Dynasty, Fidel Castro, Marshal Tito, Enver Hoxha, and Chairman Mao himself who ruled Communist countries for decades until their deaths from natural causes. 

    These two 'intel experts' know about as much about China as the average customer at Panda Express knows. If any American Administration acted on their advice, what it would accomplish is backing China into a corner---we see how well this strategy worked with Russia. Not that the Oligarchs care; the Military-Industrial Complex, Big Ag, and the Energy Cartels have made substantial profits bankrupting Europe and sacrificing men and material into Ukraine. No doubt they hope the same profits from inciting a war in East Asia; and given the Center for Security Policy's deep ties to defense contractors, it's likely the case. 

   In reality, though, most articles of these types will accomplish nothing except to stir up political tensions, not only between the US and China, but further divide Americans over more imaginary 'crises.' If by chance a Republican becomes President in 2024, watch for the Official Narrative to shift suddenly to: "Thanks to the Democrats, we missed our 'window of opportunity' to stop China! Now they're too strong! So you mustn't mind happily spending more tax dollars on the Military-Industrial Complex, right? You do? Why, you Commie Pinko---you're either with us or against us!" 

    It really wouldn't hurt most Americans---Liberal or Conservative---if they stopped for a few minutes and starting asking themselves if what they're hearing is the truth. Unfortunately, though, most Americans want drama instead of solutions, and the two parties, the Corporate Media and Academic Mafia have learned that the sale of fear is a valuable commodity, indeed. 

THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND ATHEISM

      I've been following with interest some of the ongoing debates and discussions at Citizen Tom's blog lately. The last month or so, he's been writing on various Christian-themed topics, which has brought a roving pack of Atheists to his comments section. I never quite understand people like this: they seem to circle the Internet looking for religiously-oriented posts, like a bunch of crows hunting out cornfields. Actually, they're worse: because at least crows don't try to lecture the farmer on why he doesn't need grain anyway. 

     The problem that most of these Atheists have is twofold: the first is that their understanding of what God is is not very sophisticated. The second is none of them seem to grasp that the onus of proof in a debate of this kind is for them to prove that God does not exist---not the other way around. A few Atheists, however, do grasp the second point, and commenter called 'Sklyjd' took a try at it, using the age-old Problem of Evil as his argument:

    "A woman was ill, her family prayed and prayed and prayed for many days but she died as science and doctors had predicted. 20 plus thousand kids die every day in agony from hunger and disease while untold greedy wealthy and dishonest people live the good life. Millions have died over 2 world wars...Your God appears to have left it all up to his flawed creation. Your God has never stepped up to the mark for many thousands of years...This is really good evidence God does not exist, or he does not give a F___k; so what evidence is there that your God has done something physically to save humans from themselves?"

    Citizen Tom gave a more traditional summary of the argument:

    The Problem – The gods are all-good, powerful, and knowing and yet there is evil. Thus either the gods can’t do away with evil—in which case they’re not all-powerful, or they won’t do away with evil—in which case they’re not all good. We can distinguish between:

   a) The logical problem of evil – gods and evil are incompatible or inconsistent; and;

   b)The evidentiary problem of evil – evil counts as evidence against the gods.

     This isn't an argument which should be dismissed too easily: polls showing the recent explosion of Atheistic beliefs among younger Americans indicate that this very argument is at the base of their unbelief. The consistency of this reason being given leads one to suspect that an agenda is being pushed among their educators and influencers. Alom Shaha, one of the celebrity academics promoting Scientism in pop culture, authored a book titled The Young Atheists Handbook {nota bene}. Therein he expressed the 'Problem of Evil' in terms reflecting the deep and profound reasoning that postmodern Academia employs to deny God's existence: "For a lot of us the 'God Hypothesis' simply doesn't work...The problem of evil genuinely stumps most ordinary believers. In my experience, they usually respond with an answer along the lines of, ‘God moves in mysterious ways.’ Sometimes they’ll say, ‘Suffering is God’s way of testing us,’ to which the obvious response is, ‘Why does he have to test us in such evil ways’ To which the response is, ‘God moves in mysterious ways.’ You get the idea.”

    Actually, I don't get the idea. The problem with Shaha's reasoning is that he presumes only two Divine Attributes: Divine Power and Divine Love, and assumes that the existence of Evil makes the two Attributes contradictory---without realizing that God is also All-Wise and All-Knowing. Since Wisdom is part the very Nature of God, it follows that whatever He wills is in accordance with Divine Wisdom. When something is explained by an underlying wisdom, it implies a reason for its occurrence. In this light, the Atheist view of  God is reductionist; and by doing so, they build a logical straw man. Alom's argument is further illogical, he commits the fallacy of argumentum ad ignoratium, arguing from ignorance. Because he cannot access Divine Wisdom, he presumes that it does not exist; which goes back to our earlier point about Atheists generally lacking an intellectually mature Concept of God. Alom is certainly not alone among his peers: interested readers can look up the Rationalwiki article on 'prayer' to get an idea of how simplistic their reasoning really is. 

     The other fallacy involved in this Atheistic line of reasoning strongly implies a deeply egocentric conception of how the world operates: because the Atheist can't fathom a reason behind the evils and sufferings of the world, they assume that there is no reason---and it follows that their own ideals of Good are supreme. This is one reason why Atheists are generally drawn like magnets to utopian and totalitarian political and social movements; Bolshevism, Naziism, the Great Reset, etc. are all about re-ordering society and human nature to what a handful of ideologues consider superior wisdom to God's. Almost all major religions hold that the fact of the existence of evil also strongly suggests Freedom of the Will; which is another reason that many Atheists of authoritarian bent find the idea of God distasteful. 

   Citizen Tom brought up the counter-point that the existence of Evil presupposes the existence of Good; and when God is removed, there is no objective standard for either good or evil. Thus, all actions are matters of preference, not matters of fact. A moral relativist cannot reach a consensus with all other moral relativists about objective good and evil; thus what is determined is a moral system largely dependent on subjective values of preference---which, as we have seen in our own current system---is dependent on the wealthier lobbyists, social trends, and interest groups: but not facts. In a broader sense, this moral confusion leads to social instability; hence the growth of movements like Scientism which speak with the authority of a religion. Similar Atheistic Regimes have ended up like cults: the Cult of Reason by the French Jacobins; Nazi Occultism; and even some variants of Marxism like North Korea's Juche system stem from the failure of Moral Relativism to bring about social order.

   It's an interesting fact that, in Christianity, St. John posits the Advent of Christ as a Divine Emanation from the Logos, or Wisdom of God; and that throughout John's Gospel, Jesus is portrayed as following the Divine Will, up to and including his Crucifixion. How would the Atheist reconcile this with the teaching throughout John's writings that God is Love? St. Catherine of Siena, in her Dialogue on Providence succinctly explains: "Everything comes from Love, all is ordained for the salvation of Man, God does nothing without this goal in mind."

   The existence of Evil does not disprove the existence of God. When the Atheists speak of Evil and suffering; what they really mean is that God didn't create a Utopia---which they define according to their own subjective definitions of what good and evil ought to be. We've seen throughout History how well these utopias have all worked out; and many of them devolved into religious cults in their own right. Belief in God and a desire to serve and understand Him is an instinct innate in all of Mankind, and no amount of sophistry has ever proven otherwise, nor ever will.

THE DEEP STATE DOUBLES-DOWN

    President Trump once referred to the American Media as a national disgrace and it truly is. Certainly, the Media isn't the only American institution to which that label could apply, but it is one of the most visible. This last week or so, we saw the embarrassing performance of our nominal Head-of-State at the G20 Summit, where he not only failed to accomplish a single thing, but swooned while speaking and had to be led off stage. His Vice-Premier, Kamala Harris was humiliated at the ASEAN Summit previously. Kamala wasn't phased: she headed off to some dive and a video surfaced of her be-bopping to some rap band. The Media was slobbering over this; as was the public: it was one of 'top-trending' stories of the week. Not much mention was made of the ASEAN Summit, though. Apparently, the propaganda message here was to reassure the Ameroboobs that Kamala still has some energy left, in case Uncle Joe's batteries give out. 

    With these international blunders swept under the rug, the Junta's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Anthony Blinken gave an address at Johns Hopkins University, assuring everyone of their firm commitment to the New World Order. This story didn't get a fraction of the interest that Kamala's dance moves did; but it did seem to be a little more significant. His choice of venues made an important statement in its own right. That he made this speech near the 33rd Anniversary of Bush Sr.'s New World Order speech is quite a coincidence too. 

   For those unfamiliar with Johns Hopkins: it's really less of a university and more of a Deep State cutout. This is the locale where such notorious projects as Clade X, Event 201, and SPARS 2025 were conducted. Johns Hopkins' President is a Canadian national and longtime Deep State operative of that country named Ronald Daniels. He's held that position since the Obama Administration and likely will for life. Daniels was awarded Canada's highest civilian medal by Tiananmen Trudeau in 2016. 

   The University is heavily involved with the World Economic Forum and maintains a massive lobbying organization inside the Washington Beltway. The speech itself was held at Johns Hopkins' School of Advanced International Studies which recently opened a new facility at the cost of over $300 million, just a few blocks from the US Capitol and the White House. The Dean of that school is a former Obama operative, James Steinberg; and its faculty includes such Deep State figures as Paul Wolfowitz and Hank Paulsen. Blinken himself won an honorary fellowship at SAIS in 2017.

    Blinken told the crowd of current and aspiring spooks that "What we are experiencing now is more than a test of the post-Cold War order. It's the end of it. Decades of relative geopolitical stability have given way to an intensifying competition with authoritarian powers, revisionist powers," meaning of course China and Russia which are challenging the Western Oligarchy's delusions of a global Great Reset. “One era is ending, a new one is beginning, and the decisions that we make now will shape the future for decades to come.”

    That was a fairly blatant admission of what the goals of this current 'Government' actually are. Blinken, though, wasn't finished: "The US will lead from a position of strength,” he thundered, "When the Beijings and Moscows of the world try to rewrite – or rip down – the pillars of the multilateral system, when they falsely claim that the order exists merely to advance the interests of the West at the expense of the rest, a growing global chorus of nations and people will stand up to say, ‘No, the system you are trying to change is our system. It serves our interests.’”

  The only 'multilateral system' that Blinken means---which leads from 'a position of strength'---is the economic and military concentration of power held by the current US government and the globalist corporations which actually own it. "We are determined to work with any country so long as they want to deliver for their citizens, contribute to solving shared challenges, and uphold the international norms we’ve built together," Blinken added; which doesn't make his claims of 'multilateralism' sound especially convincing. "Our efforts to re-imagine and revitalize our network of allies and partners have put us in a position of strength to meet the defining tests of our era." 

   In what sounded eerily like a WEF Position Paper, Blinken boasted about the Junta's Foreign Policy 'achievements:' "We’ve mobilized hundreds of billions of dollars with the G7 to close the global infrastructure gap... are shaping the rules of the road for AI, and addressing the global synthetic drugs epidemic. We are working not only with governments, but also civil society, the private sector, academia, and citizens, especially young leaders."

   Not that that should be surprising. Blinken's former advisor (and former Biden speechwriter) Jonathan Finer is a WEF member; and Blinken was a mentor to activist and WEF Young Global Leader Ashleigh Streeter-Jones. Finer currently is head of Political Risk and Public Policy at Warburg-Pincus, one of the US' largest private equity firms. Blinken's father was one of Warburg-Pincus' founders. Before holding his current position, Blinken was a Revolving-Door Beltway lobbyist for WestExec. His clients included WEF Top 100 Strategic Partners Bank of America, Facebook/Meta, Uber Technologies, McKinsey & Co., and Lazard; as well as WEF members the Blackstone Group and Boeing. He also represented the Royal Bank of Canada, which later played a significant role in crushing the Canadian Truckers Protest during Blinken's tenure as Secretary of State. In spite of this record, (or possibly because of it), 28 Republican Senators voted for Blinken's confirmation. All of which shows that, in spite of Blinken's rhetoric, our Foreign Policy is really conducted in the interests of an interlocking confederation of crooks. 

    Another point which shouldn't be overlooked is, that while Blinken was addressing foreign policy, the underlying attitude towards domestic policy isn't much different. In fact, commitment to the Great Reset and servility to global economic cabals has been one of---if not the only---consistent feature of this 'administration' since seizing power in 2021. It's something to bear in mind, because sentiments like Blinken advocates doesn't sound as though they're considering going away quietly in 2024. 

   

   

    

UMM...OK, NOW THE BIDEN IMPEACHMENT

     So, after refusing to challenge the obviously fraudulent 2020 'election', remaining silent while political protesters were locked up for two years under inhuman conditions before being sentenced to long prison terms by kangaroo courts, and generally adopting a go-along-to-get-along policy with the Junta; the Republican Party leadership is growing concerned. Most of their constituency doesn't trust them anymore---which ordinarily wouldn't really concern them too much. The recent Trump Indictment, however, has many of them nervous about saving their own hides because the Trump Drama is proving that nobody is untouchable if they should get in the New Order's way.

   Thus, they've decided to play the 'Impeachment Card' again. Not that Biden isn't guilty of numerous crimes; but the Republicans have to work under the same handicap that they suffered during the previous Clinton Impeachment: exposure of the actual crimes would implicate too many of their own members, so the issue legally has to be vague enough to confound the average Ameroboob while rife with enough gutter-level sexual innuendo and salacious tell-all bedroom stories to grab the usual voyeuristic headlines which fixate American attention.

     Now, the official narrative coming from the RNC is that, following Obama's successful staging of a Color Revolution in Ukraine in 2014, then Vice-President Biden's son, Hunter, bribed off officials of the new Regime to protect Corporate Oil interests (as if Republican leaders weren't guilty of the same thing). In reality, Obama and Biden should have been impeached then; because (I think anyway) it's still illegal for Americans to stage foreign coups on behalf of Corporate interests. 

  18 US Code, para.956: (b) "Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, conspires with one or more persons, regardless of where such other person or persons are located, to damage or destroy specific property situated within a foreign country and belonging to a foreign government or to any political subdivision thereof with which the United States is at peace, or any railroad, canal, bridge, airport, airfield, or other public utility, public conveyance, or public structure, or any religious, educational, or cultural property so situated, shall, if any of the conspirators commits an act within the jurisdiction of the United States to effect any object of the conspiracy, be imprisoned not more than 25 years."

  But---the Red Tsunami which came in in 2010 didn't see fit to do anything, either: so...fast forward to today. According to Head-of-State Biden, neither he nor his son did anything illegal; because, thanks again to a Republican-dominated Supreme Court, in 2016 political bribery effectively became legalized. Biden's actions in 2014, therefore, become an Ex Post Facto crime and are no longer enforceable; hence this Impeachment is going nowhere---in fact, it's probably not intended to. 

  The Impeachment is another publicity stunt, another abuse of the legal system, further dumbing-down of popular discourse and substituting legal chicanery to gain political ends. True, we expect the Whacko Left to resort to such sleazy tactics; but we need to be better than this. Our side needs to start standing up like men; stop pandering to the sordid tastes of the degenerate culture and try elevating it with some constructive solutions, personal responsibility, and standing up for their's (and our's) Rights. 

  I'm not expecting that to happen. It seems that with gasoline at $6/gallon, bread at $5/loaf. butter at $9/lb., bacon at $11/lb., schools and infrastructure collapsing, cancel culture and the Gay Mafia running wild, and out-of-control crime---there are more important things to worry about than listening to lurid stories about Hunter Biden smoking crack cocaine with whores---which is probably what many (if not most) of our own neighbors are doing. 

  Our problems are not going to be solved by litigation any more than they'll be solved by politics. Our national problems are based in issues of character, and are spiritual at their root. A corrupt Government is the outgrowth of a corrupt society; and that is what has to change. 

SEPTEMBER 11th AND THE OUT-OF-TOUCH RIGHT

      Yesterday marked the anniversaries of two important turning-points in American history. 22 years before, in 2001, the greatest mass-murder in American history occurred when four airliners were hijacked and rammed into buildings in New York and Washington. The Bush Administration reacted with an unprecedented power-grab, which continues to this day and his been expanded upon considerably. While previous Presidents also assumed extraordinary powers during times of national crisis; they had limitations on how far or for how long such powers could be extended. The Bush policy was unique in that de facto Martial Law was extended indefinitely and without public oversight.

     Eleven years to the day before, in 1990, the father of the aforementioned Bush gave an infamous address to the nation, basically admitting that the US Deep State was now in charge and that we were entering a New World Order wherein it would be accountable to no one. Pundits of that day were proclaiming the End of History and the Pax Americana, which were academic sound-bites meaning that the US Deep State was now the world power, and on both a global and national scale, submission to their will was to be predestined order of things. Junior's policies post 9/11 were reflections of that very blueprint; and the Democrats of the Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Obama, and Biden variety adopted the same philosophy, although their term for it is Neoliberalism. The 'Great Reset' is the final convergence of the permanent Deep State and Cartel Capitalism, where political and economic power are concentrated in the hands of the few.

       Shortly after President Trump was removed from Office, we said here at the time that the only hope that the Republican Party had---if it ever wanted to be a viable political movement again---was to do two things: 

       1. Repudiate the Neoconservatives and their hangers-on in the Alt Right;

       2. Publicly admit to their own complicity in subverting our republican system; and taking a pledge to undo the policies that they previously promoted; and to restore Constitutional order. 

      Unfortunately, neither of these things have happened; and these yo-yo's are talking blithely about a 2024 'Red Tsunami'. The current leader of the GOP 'candidates' is about to be purged: jailed and disqualified from office; while of the next two 'front-runners;' one is a WEF Young Global Leader and the other is a stooge of the Bush Machine. 

     What's even worse is that the self-styled intellectuals on the Right are the ones pushing the 'double-down' approach. Victor Davis Hanson, for example, graced us all again yesterday with an article titled The Frightened Left. An intriguing, title: frankly, though, I haven't seen much evidence that the Left is especially afraid of doing much of anything. Hanson is fancied by many on the Right as the philosophical heir to William F. Buckley, though the comparison is about as apt as comparing Stephen Colbert to James Madison. 

    The conclusion one draws from all of Hanson's writings is that everything wrong in America suddenly appeared---like Spontaneous Generation---from 2021 forward, and that our only national salvation lies in returning the Neocons to power. I'm certain that all of us remember those halcyon days of the Bush Years: the Government was noted for its transparency; there was no runaway price inflation; human rights and the Constitution were deeply respected; schools functioned perfectly; jobs were plentiful and well-paid, as all the American workers sang for joy in factory and field and all the girls were innocent virgins. Thanks largely to our servile media, and Americans' attention-spans and memories hopelessly being crippled by the concentrations of fat in their brains and their addiction to narcotics that academics can get away with spouting this kind of nonsense. 

    I have return to an observation on the excesses of the French Revolution explained by Dead White Male and Founding Father Thomas Paine, because understanding this point explains a lot of the actions taken by the current US Government:

   "Let us therefore examine how men came by the idea of punishing others in this manner. They learn it from the governments that they live under; and retaliate with the punishments that they have been accustomed to behold. The heads stuck upon pikes which remained for years on the Temple-Bar differ nothing in the horror of the scenes of the heads being carried about on pikes in the Paris streets: yet this was done by the English government. It may be said that it signifies nothing to a man what is done to him after he is dead; but it signifies much to the living. It either tortures their feelings or it hardens their hearts; in either case, it instructs them how to punish when power falls into their hands. Lay then the axe to the root, and teach governments humanity. It is their sanguinary punishments which corrupt mankind."

   Back during the Post-9/11 Hysteria, many of us warned that the powers being assumed by the Federal Government could someday pass into the hands of the Militant Left and be turned against us. If Hanson had been paying attention back then instead of whooping it up at Country Club Golf Courses and on Luxury Cruises, he might have remembered the policies pursued by the Neocon Establishment were the precedents for everything that he wails about today and imagines were innovations brought in with the Biden Junta.

   Hanson, for example, speaks of the misuse of Impeachment and says: "In modern times, the nation has not rushed to impeach a president without a special counsel investigation to determine whether the chief executive was guilty of Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. But thanks to the Democrats, recent impeachments now have destroyed all those guardrails." Apparently, Hanson has forgotten that only 25 years ago, the Republicans---for wholly political reasons---launched a ridiculous attempt to impeach President Clinton. 

  What did Paine say again about "it instructs them how to punish when power falls into their hands?" That shameful event was followed quickly by Congress punting their responsibility to settle the disputed 2000 Election into the hands of the Court; and the Democrats learned from the examples our side set that litigation can be weaponized in place of voting and debate. 

  The rest of Hanson's article is a tedious laundry-list of crimes that the Democrats are committing that he wishes that Republicans could still get away with doing. This is why we've insisted that for the GOP to regain any credibility (and time is rapidly running out for them to do this) is to repudiate the Neocon past. Our side complains ad nauseam about the Left 'weaponizing' all of our institutions: yet I can't think of a single example where our side didn't provide them with the weapons to do it with. 

  Like Hitler's rise to power which established Nazi Germany, everything being done to establish the Great Reset is being done according to legal precedent. The Weimar Republic's Constitution technically was in effect until 1945; a dead letter, to be sure, but it was never abolished; and the Third Reich was established according to precedents set during the Weimar Republic. Hitler governed by authority of Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution, which stated: “If public security and order are seriously disturbed or endangered within the German Reich, the President of the Reich may take measures necessary for their restoration, intervening if need be with the assistance of the armed forces.” It also allowed the President to suspend civil liberties guaranteed in the Weimar Constitution; and President Friedrich Ebert had invoked it during the hyperinflation of 1923 and President Paul von Hindenburg invoked it on occasion thereafter. Shortly after Hitler was elected in 1933, the Nazi Party in the Parliament passed the Enabling Act of 1933, which allowed the Nazi Government to pass and enact laws without Congressional approval. That law was challenged and upheld by the Weimar Supreme Court. 

  Post 9/11 especially, we saw much the same thing. It was the Bush Administration which normalized the use of torture and the suspensions of Due Process. They normalized Domestic Espionage, they authorized the Executive Branch (i.e. the Deep State) to enact laws, spend tax dollars, and order military interventions without Congressional approval. They established blacklists and surveillance of dissidents. They expanded outsourcing and Private Public Partnerships which helped the Corporate Oligarchy to establish the foothold it has over the United States today. The Bush Administration gave governors the power to declare 'states of emergency' unilaterally and suspend republican government, as we saw during the Scamdemic. They expanded the Government and financial octopus' tentacles into the public schools and universities. 

  As for the Clinton and Obama Administrations, let us not forget that both had majority Republican Congresses and Senates for 6 of their 8-year terms, and that US Supreme Court was a Republican Majority that entire time. 

 No, the Left isn't afraid of us now; and we have no one to blame but ourselves. This owning the Libtards and business as usual strategy will fail, regardless of which Party the Oligarchs choose to govern us in 2024. It's merely continuing the same cycle of bad and irresponsible government that got us where we are.

    

     

A WEEKEND RECAP AND A QUESTION

       This week we've been writing mostly about Summit Meetings and various positive developments abroad. Here's a roundup of what's been happening in our own exceptional nation this week alone, which kind of puts the world situation in some perspective.

      1. Our old friend Willy Gates has a new environmental initiative. In drought-stricken California---where every farm except those growing marijuana have burned to a crisp---Gates is funding a project to raze the remaining California forests and bury the wood. No---we peasants don't even get to turn it into lumber. 

      Frankly, I'm not especially interested in Gates' ridiculous reasons for doing this: whatever he says probably isn't the real reason anyway. The point here is: who authorized him do this? We're talking about a project that is going to cause significant environmental damage. Did anybody in California or anywhere else take a vote on this project? I haven't researched it; but one can't imagine that a project of this scope doesn't violate several USDA, National Forest Service, and EPA regulations. This is just further proof that Gates and other Oligarchs operate entirely above the law.

    2. Speaking of being above the Law, the People's Tribunal convened in Georgia for the purpose of purging the Republican Party, secured it's first conviction. Peter Navarro faces two years in a State Gulag for the crime of having been a presidential advisor. While it's true that the Constitution and other laws have Executive Privilege exemptions, and specify who can try officials for misconduct, we're living in an era where such Rights really don't mean much. With their bloodlust whetted, the Inquisitors employed by the Junta are seeking to expand their persecutions to include sitting elected officials. The failure of American Conservatives to stop the kangaroo court convened over the January 6th protests led to this. This is America's version of the Great Purge, though don't expect Big Media or Academia Incorporated to call it that. Don't expect it to stop with a few protesters or politicians either.

   3. In New Mexico, Governor-for-Life Michelle Lujan Grisham declared a 'Public Health Emergency' over 'gun violence' and used it to suspend gun rights more or less statewide. Well, why not? Grisham gained authoritarian control by using an influenza outbreak to suspend the 1st Amendment; why not use a crime spree as an excuse to suspend the 2nd? 

   As we've pointed out here before, these 'emergency declarations' were made possible by George Bush and a GOP-controlled Congress during our earlier panic-attack over terrorism. That's probably the reason why the GOP has done absolutely nothing to curb these kinds of abuses of power; and in fact have freely participated in them on several occasions.

   4. California's State Assembly, meanwhile, has authorized by a 57-16 vote the State's secret police agency Child Protective Services to break down the doors and seize children and teenagers whose parents or guardians don't obediently toe the Homo Agenda. Of course, agencies like these have been abusing children and young adults for decades now; but nobody cares as long as it only happens to someone else's family.

   5. Not to be outdone, it appears that one of the New America's Party Youth Organizations, the Girl Scouts, have begun issuing Merit Badges in the name of Rainbow Pride. Among the activities the little ones do to earn this award are making a sketch of an admired homo; attending a so-called 'pride event;' and making a music playlist of homo artists. Their counterpart, the Young Pioneers, Boy Scouts were sold out years ago by stalwart Conservatives like Robert Gates and 'Rainbow Rex' Tillerson. 

    Since their conversion into youth movements, enrollment numbers have been declining; however this means nothing to the ideologues behind them. They'll take a smaller number of correctly indoctrinated youth to be groomed for future activism and leadership positions (alongside being groomed for other things) against nonconformists whom they intend to marginalize anyway.

    While we might be inclined to shake our heads at how our culture is decline; we ought to realize that the reverse perspective is also true: these stories represent one week's progress in implementing the Great Reset. We've had many weeks just like it and a lot more coming.

    Despite the Fascists' land-grabs, gun-grabs, political purges, and preying upon the nation's youth, Conservatives---and Americans in general---continue along in blissful ignorance; apparently still not convinced that the people behind the Great Reset weren't joking about what they intend to do: and even worse, about the fact that they've already accomplished many of their goals and are well on the way to completing them. In spite of there having been no electoral reform of any kind and opposition leaders being thrown in jail and organized movements against dissent rapidly taking place; we still have pundits assuring us that polls, elections, and political stunts to own the Libtards actually matter. Even more ridiculous are the keyboard-warriors on the Alt-Right who fantasize about another Civil War: even though the Opposition has a stranglehold on the Military-Industrial Complex and the proponents of this 'Great Uprising' have no organization, plan, or even numbers to back them up. 

    If anyone wants a specimen of where the majority of Americans' minds are, contrast today's top-trending news stories against the ones listed above:

    1. "Patriots owner announces he'll break HOF rule for Tom Brady." 

    2. "Michigan State head coach fired after allegations of sexual misconduct."

    3. "Chris Evans marries Alba Baptista in Cape Cod wedding with his Superhero co-stars as guests."

   4. "Danny Masterson victim shares clip of Ashton Kucher talking about kissing 14- year old Mila Kunis."

   5. "Questions about Melania Trump's whereabouts hit an all-time high ahead of Donald's Iowa appearance." 

  6. "The two marijuana stocks that could jump by 66% and 79% according to Wall Street experts."

  7. "Big Brother spoilers: Season 25's Week 6 veto winner has a huge decision to make after surprise nominations."

  Yes: that really sounds like a populace ready to brace itself firmly against tyranny. Who can doubt that such a well-educated and well-informed public isn't prepared to elect honest leaders committed to the bedrock principles of republican government? We can see from this list that it's 1776 all over again; no doubt these worthies are holding reasoned debates about restoring Constitutional Government and engaging in philosophical discussions about the Rights of Man and how best to achieve them. 

   The course of action that we should be taking is to get out of this fog of denial and start realizing that we are the Counter-culture and not the 'silent majority.' Network with like-minded people. Establish parallel economies and societies wherever possible. Disengage, disunite, disjoin from the Great Reset as much as one can. Engage in passive resistance. If they force you, obey, but never volunteer. The Great Reset, like most such schemes, ultimately will fail but we need to disillusion ourselves of the idea that it will be defeated without effort and without sacrifice.