In one of his most important speeches yet; Pope Francis yesterday spoke out against high-level corruption in Western republics and stressed the effects that corporate/political intrigues have on the dignity of the individual. The address was titled "Work, Home, and Country" the three pillars which the Pope states are integral to human potential. The address was given before a meeting of international NGO leaders in Rome. NGOs, as we know, are typically connected to such unsavory characters as the Podesta Brothers, George Soros, and the Clinton Foundation. The Pope denounced the perverse policies of such leaders.
Francis spoke against the growing climate of polarization in Western societies; saying that such an atmosphere is rooted in fear. "No tyranny is supported without exploiting our fears. Hence all tyranny is based in terrorism. This terrorism is sown in the peripheries of society with massacres, looting, and injustice. Citizens who still retain some rights are tempted by the false security of physical or social walls; walls that enclose some and banish others. Citizens walled in, terrified, on one side; excluded, exiled and even more terrified on the outside. Is this the life that God wants for His children?
"Fear feeds off manipulation. While this may be 'good business' for the merchants of death; fear weakens, unbalances, and destroys our psychological and spiritual defenses. It anesthetizes us in front of the suffering of others and in the end makes us cruel."
It is certainly refreshing to hear a voice of spiritual reason during these unsettled political times. Francis explained that the fear and divisiveness being sown in society stems from an idolatry of money and power.
"This unjust situation that promotes all exclusion can harden in to an existential whip that enslaves, steals liberty, plunders without mercy and constantly threatens others, to drive everyone like cattle to what the divinized moneyed interests want." he stated. "There is a basic terrorism that emanates from the global control of money against humanity as a whole. From this basic terrorism, there are derivative terrorisms; such as narcoterrorism and what is mistakenly called religious terrorism.
"No people, no religion is terroristic. It's certain that there are enclaves of extremists everywhere on all sides. But terrorism begins when have rejected the wonder of Creation, man and woman, and replace it with money."
Would that we heard speeches like this during the 2016 elections, from any candidate. But unsurprisingly, the Corporate Media---which has many political and financial connections to NGOs---largely passed over Francis' speech in shamed silence. A few in the Blogosphere went so far as to denounce the Pope for his remarks; which contradicted their own divisive and exclusionary positions. The Pope's words humbled them too, comparing them to the Pharisees who persecuted Christ for violating their Sabbath Laws in the service of humanity.
"What happens in the world today, when a financial institution goes bankrupt, scandalous sums of money immediately appear to save it. But when this bankruptcy of humanity occurs, is there even a 1/1000 of part to save those brothers and sisters who suffer so much? In Europe, the Mediterranean has become a graveyard; and not only there, but by the walls, walls stained with innocent blood. Again it is fear that hardens the heart and becomes blind cruelty which refuses to see the blood, the pain, the face of the other."
This is from a spiritual leader who is denounced by anti-Catholic bigots on both the American political Left and Right. The Left persecutes the Catholic Church because it won't radicalize immigrants; the Right hates them for helping immigrants at all. The Pope noted this hatred, which grows out of fear, in his concluding remarks:
"When you rise to the level of Love, of recognizing its great beauty and power, the only thing you seek to defeat are these evil systems. To the people trapped in these systems, you love them, but you try to defeat that system. Hate for hate only intensifies the existence of hatred and evil in the universe. It simply never ends. Somewhere, somebody must have some moral sense, and that is the truly strong person. The strong person is the person who can break the chain of hatred, the chain of evil."
In that single paragraph Francis taught men more about masculine social duties than all of the Red Pill nonsense combined. This is actually what is taught to us in all our cultural mythos of heroes fighting dragons and other monsters. The monsters represent dehumanized evil by their form and systematized evil by their size and power. In the cultural mythos, these monsters are always terrorizing some group of people who are liberated by the hero slaying the monster. These myths were shadows of a spiritual truth, which the Pope explains: as Christ liberated all sinners through His sacrifice and destroyed the system of serpentine Satan; so Christian men are called upon to follow His example and break up evil systems enslaving others. Both the Cultural Marxists and the reactionary Right mistakenly co-identify the Dragon with those whom he enslaves.
"Our need is to promote Love and build bridges in a world that is increasingly marked by fear and by building walls in societies where conflict and inequality prevail." the Pope said. "Christ faced hypocritical and self-sufficient thought with a humble intelligence of the heart which always prioritizes the human being and rejects certain logics that obstruct their freedom to live, love, and serve their neighbor."
Tonight's security incident during a Trump rally in Reno shows two things. One is that the US Secret Service is still an efficient organization despite Obama's social engineering experiments in the Federal Government. Lest we forget, there actually was an assassination attempt on Trump in Las Vegas less than four months ago. And with Obama blasting off about 'potential terror attacks' before the election, the Secret Service acted quite properly.
What the incident does show, more than anything else, is why we need a professional news media. As it turned out, there was no assassination attempt, the suspect was a 'Never- Trump' conservative protestor who reached for a sign and was mistakenly thought to have a weapon. The Alt-Right's would-be alternative media made complete fools of themselves while the establishment Corporate Media pooh-poohed the whole event as some hysterical over-reaction.
Mike Cernovich, Roosh Valizdeh, and Vox Day were up within the hour not only claiming an assassination attempt, but offering opinions---although to his credit, Valizdeh did say that the details were not fully known. Cernovich and Day, however, had all the answers.
"Assassination attempt tonight, Secret Service heroes protect Trump {against would-be} assailant. Media is covering this up!"
No, Cernovich. The media was waiting for a statement from the police, which is what you should have done. See, your theory that 'Conflict is attention, and intention is influence' doesn't really work when concrete facts are involved.
And Vox Day: "Hilary's supporters are getting increasingly desperate," The Dark Lord warned.
Meanwhile, the Corporate Media---many of whose members have been caught red-handed in various Clinton-related scandals---have been quick to pounce on the "baseless allegations of an assassination attempt" and the "unprofessional conduct" of their Internet competitors. Which is mostly a lot of projection on their own part.
Jeremy Diamond of CNN---an effete protégée of Anderson Cooper---states "protestor says he was roughed up," in his headline, and rather ho-hums the whole incident. Diamond also snidely insinuates that the crowd singled out the suspect because he was a known Never-Trumper.
What happened tonight is simply this, and nothing more: Law Enforcement was placed on high alert in Reno; a protestor acted suspiciously; the Secret Service reacted properly; the protestor was released without being charged. End of story.
Or is it? This incident says a lot about where we've fallen as a culture---not so much because of the incident itself, but because of public reaction to it. Essentially the two dominant reactions here are one side ready to form lynch-mobs and the other behaving as though a legitimate security threat was no big deal. The Ameroboobs need collectively to stop behaving as though these elections are Reality TV shows and start taking them seriously.
Not only that, but we need a genuine media again this country. Between the full-time Internet trolls and the corporate shills, the state of American journalism has dropped to below the levels of sleazy tabloids of a few years ago.
Julian Assange is truly one of the heroes of the 21st Century. Risking his life and liberty in the cause of justice; Assange is now living in a dreary exile in fear of the very nation that once made Liberty of the Press one of its defining principles. Recently, Assange gave an exclusive interview with John Pilger, one of his countrymen also driven from his homeland. The two discussed many topics of current interest, none of which are covered by the US Corporate Media.
Assange stated that, in his opinion, the most important fact coming from the recent Podesta e-mail leak was the Clinton's admission that Saudi Arabia and Qatar were funding ISIS; yet took bribes from them and laundered the money through the Clinton Foundation. Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama have engineered some of the largest arms sales in history to the Wahhabi-run Gulf States---which in turn has been employed against the people of Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Bahrain.
John Podesta himself hardly has clean hands in these types of intrigues. He and his brother, Tony Podesta, founded the Podesta Group, a shady lobbying organization in 1988. The organization's own website advertises: "We are a top-ranked bipartisan team of global public affairs specialists. Always original, never ordinary, we know how to change outcomes." And as we can see, these outcomes are arranged at very high prices. Two out of every three lobbyists working for the Podesta Group previously held positions in the Federal Government. And we've further seen from the O'Keefe videos, that the Podesta Gang is not above twisting a few arms and bending a few laws as part of their 'originality.'
We saw no greater example of Clinton ruthlessness than in Libya.
"Libya, more than anything else was Hilary Clinton's war." Assange explained. "That's documented throughout her e-mails. She put her favored agent Sidney Blumenthal on it. Out of the 33,000 e-mails we published, 1,700 are about Libya. It was not simply that Libya had cheap oil. She perceived the removal of Qaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state that she could use in the general election to run for president. In 2011, there was even an internal document produced for Hilary Clinton giving her history as a central figure in the overthrow of the Libyan state."
Blumenthal, a political blackguard of the most repulsive and unscrupulous type, is best remembered for his activities during Bill Clinton's impeachment hearings. Blumenthal was then in charge of digging up sleazy sexual rumors about Republican Congressmen and passing them along to the press. During his Libyan intrigues, Blumenthal was being paid by the Clinton Foundation; and at the same time lobbying insiders for government contracts in Libya.
Assange neatly described the current US power structure and Hilary Clinton's role in it. "She represents a whole network of people, and a network of relationships with particular states...she is like the axis that interconnects all these different groups. She's a smooth central representation of all of that, and all of that is more or less what is in power in the United States. It's what you call the Establishment, the DC Consensus and its influences. In fact, one of the most significant Podesta e-mails that we released was about how the Obama Cabinet was actually formed---and half of the Obama Cabinet was nominated by a representative from Citibank."
Then-Senator Joseph Biden---touted by many as Clinton's choice for Secretary of State---was an integral part of this process. During Biden's Senate career, his top donors were financial lawyers and lobbyists ($6.9 million); financial institutions ($4 million); business services ($1.8 million). Small wonder that so many financial concerns are located in Biden's home state of Delaware.
The Clintons, Podestas, Blumenthal, Biden, the degenerate Wahhabi sheiks: these are the real faces of America's so-called 'Cultural Elites.' Through this series of exposures, Assange has converted what were once suspicions into concrete facts. Whether or not these exposures will have any effect on the effete US public remains to be seen.
Last weekend, as we recall, we published a list of our ten most popular articles during the last six months. This Friday, we are going to publish our top five most popular entertainment choices, as rated by our readership. There are actually eight at this review, due to a two-way tie at #5 and a three-way tie at #3.
We have been reviewing classical television series (with a few movie serials) which depict positive views of our culture and represent honest portrayals of morality and manhood. Beginning with next week's feature, we are going to review material from Hollywood's Golden Age. So stay tuned.
From the results from the last six months, we learned a few interesting things. Our readers have a definite preference in storylines and heroes. The top pick was something of a surprise; but it's easy to see the trend as the numbers were counted down. Though unscientific, we can learn from this list what people really find attractive in the male nature. The heroes among the top picks all certain common character traits:
1. They acted independently, and solved problems on their own initiative;
2. They answered to a higher moral code and acted according to it, regardless of the consequences.
3. They typically either had significant others, or others for whom they assumed responsibility;
4. They were universally respectful and indeed often chivalrous towards women.
All of these points run contrary to postmodernist thinking portrayed in contemporary pop culture by male feminists and Manospherians. It would seem that the traditional male with genuinely masculine characteristics is still the most admired archetype. Here are the readers' choices with dates of review:
5. (tie) The Lone Wolf (May 6th). Interestingly enough, our first and last reviews tied for 5th place, and both were similar in their lead characters. The Lone Wolf was based on a popular novel series by Louis Joseph Vance, and ran on Independent networks in 1954. The lead character, Michael Lanyard, was a modern knight-errant whose adventures were the subject of his reputation as a free-lance writer.
5. (tie) The Saint (October 28th) This series ran from 1962-1969 on Independent stations. This was a British production based on the novel series by Leslie Charteris. The lead character was Simon Templar, who like Lanyard, fought on the side of justice against the powerful and corrupt. Templar was a gentleman soldier of fortune who often had to go against the system to see right done.
4. Shotgun Slade (July 8th) Our readers agreed that this unique series was a top choice. A combination of film-noir storylines, music, and atmosphere against the backdrop of the Old West, Shotgun Slade ran on Independent networks from 1959-1961. Slade was a private detective based in Denver and got his nickname from his weapon of choice. The Old West setting gave a unique twist to the standard PI format. Slade's character was much like the others reviewed here; unyielding integrity unafraid to act on principle.
3. (tie) T.H.E. Cat (October 14th) Another deeply thought-provoking adventure series, T.H.E. Cat aired on NBC from 1966-1967. Thomas Hewitt Edward Cat was a former circus acrobat who retired to run a nightclub and engage in adventures helping people in trouble on the side. Cat had a unique set of talents, which he put in the service of others. The series was remarkable though in that portrayed good men, who were flawed but used their strengths for good, often against irrational and unyielding evil.
3. (tie) The Rifleman (September 23rd) This was a very popular Western about a gunfighter who was also the widowed father of an orphaned son. It ran from 1958-1962 on ABC. The hero of the series was Lucas McCain, a Civil War hero who wielded a custom-built Winchester rifle in the cause of right. By the very plotline, McCain's character was both an abstract and concrete example of true masculinity.
3. (tie) Combat! (May 27th) A very realistic WW2 series that aired on ABC from 1962-1967. Sgt. Chip Saunders and Lt. Gil Hanley were commanders of an infantry squad fighting their way through occupied Europe. The series episodes were of high quality and an hour long, often depicting the moral dilemmas, responsibilities, and initiatives leaders of men exhibit in critical circumstances. Saunders' character was a fairly average young man of the 1940s whose character developed him into a heroic platoon sergeant.
2. Peter Gunn (May 20th) Aired from 1958-1961 on NBC. A very popular PI series that depicted the exploits of Peter Gunn, who probably more than any other character represents the masculine qualities listed above. As did, incidentally, his love interest, Edie Hart represented a strong feminine archetype. The popularity of this series both among our readers and among earlier audiences attests to how valued these characteristics are.
1. Man Against Crime (July 15th) This series was also known as Follow That Man in syndication. Our top viewers' pick aired from 1949-1954 on DTN and was the first really popular private detective series. The character was Mike Barnett and the storylines were extremely realistic, often shot live and on location in New York. The series is relatively unknown today, but Barnett was the archetype on which almost all subsequent characters were based. It's really not surprising in retrospect that this series was the top choice: it portrayed the highest of masculine qualities in the most realistic settings.
There are a few television dramas which we were unable to review, but would like to recommend them, with the reason for their omission. Viewers are encouraged to seek out all of these:
Too Many: series that were excellent but too long-running or too complicated to review. These include:
Gunsmoke, 1955-1975 on CBS. A legendary Western featuring Marshall Matt Dillon taming the Old West from Dodge City. This series ran for 20 straight years.
The Virginian, 1962-1971 on NBC. A Western based on Owen Wister's novels. This program featured a strong, silent ranch foreman known only as the Virginian. The episodes were 90 minutes long and with profound and serious storylines. It was much like the classic film Westerns brought to television.
Boston Blackie, 1941-1952, Independent. Not well remembered today, Boston Blackie was an iconic hero of the mid-20th Century. A former jewel thief turned hero, Boston Blackie was the subject of several hour-long features spanning the 1940s, and a radio show in 1944. In the pursuit of justice, Blackie often had to outwit the bungling police who were considerable comic relief in the series. In 1952, Blackie moved to TV, with a different cast but the same general plotlines. In the TV series, he was joined by a love interest, a charming heroine named Mary Wesley. "Enemy to those who make him an enemy. Friend of those who have no friend," was Blackie's motto.
Too Few: Unfortunately, like many films, some great television series are lost. Here are three of which some episodes survive and are worth seeing on Youtube:
I'm The Law, 1953 NBC. The exploits of Inspector Kirby of the NYPD. Kirby was played by veteran actor George Raft. About 8 episodes are known extant, about half of which are on Youtube. Available episodes show this was a very well-written and involved police drama with Kirby a hands-on detective of the old school.
Rocky King, Detective, 1950-1954, DTN. Only four episodes of this series are known to survive, and on Youtube. Inspector King was also played by a veteran actor: Roscoe Karnes. Inspector King was also married and family issues were sometimes interspersed among his adventures. The episodes always concluded with King calling his wife from his office and after a short pause would say, "Yeah, we got him."
Too Scarce: These are recommended but not currently available, so keep an eye out for them. We may review these at some point in the future:
Soldiers of Fortune, 1955-1957, Independent. This was an interesting concept in that it took the theme of the Old West gunfighter and his sidekick hiring out in the Cold War Era to fight Freedom's enemies.
China Smith, 1952-1955, Independent. China Smith was an adventurer of the Lanyard and Templar mold, living in 1950s Singapore.
Johnny Staccato, 1959-1960, NBC. Johnny Staccato was a private investigator and part-time musician in the Greenwich Village clubs of the early 1960s. He was another known hero in the community to whom everyone turned when in trouble.
So, we look forward to another six months of offering classic weekend entertainment choices for your viewing pleasure.
With the 2016 Election now only a few days away, and the prospect of a Trump victory appearing more and more likely, the political fringe of the Alt-Right is pushing equally hard to cash in on Trump's success and grab the limelight. However, with the Corporate Media smokescreen around Clinton rapidly dissipating amidst ever-developing investigations and public exposures; we're beginning to see that the power of the Radical Right in influencing this election has largely been exaggerated by that same Corporate Media.
David Duke, the former chieftain of the terrorist organization the Ku Klux Klan for example, gave us an instructive lesson yesterday. Duke is running for US Senate in Louisiana and appeared last night in a debate at Dillard University. Duke calls himself 'Donald Trump's Most Loyal Advocate' and often trolls the Internet on Trump's behalf (although Trump himself repudiated Duke). Now Trump is polling ahead in Louisiana, but David Duke barely met the 5% minimum poll numbers even to be included in the debate. Polls in Louisiana show Duke's negatives at 80%. Which illustrates that---for all his bluster---Duke and the KKK have had almost no influence on Trump's support in that state.
The same can be said of many other Internet gadflies; almost all of which issue forth from the swamp that's become the Manosphere. Neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin of The Daily Stormer, who advertises as 'The World's #1 Alt-Right and Pro-Genocide Website' is another loud, but impotent, political pygmy. A protégée of Duke's, both Anglin and anti-Semite artist Ben Garrison were exposed as charlatans by Breitbart, a pro-Trump site. Both of these characters are admitted disciples of the Red Pill/Game Cult. Anglin is an avid follower of Game gurus Roosh Valizdeh and Matt Forney. Garrison states:
"I'm starting to see an expanding fan base for my politically incorrect cartoons." Garrison proudly trumpets, "I didn't really understand the culture war stuff, but after reading a book on Social Justice Warriors by Vox Day, my eyes are open." In other words, Garrison has taken the 'Red Pill' and been converted. He then goes on to describe how lucrative his 'artwork' has become since his conversion.
A recent study found, however, that most of the extremists' presence on Twitter is dominated by only a handful of trolls and cyberbullies: all with connections to the Red Pill Cult. Around 70% of Twitter traffic identified as Alt-Right related is retweeted material from a few people. The top three include Ricky Vaughn---who has now been banned from Twitter permanently---a vile racist who admits to being a follower of Game Cult blogs Chateau Heartiste and Dusk in Autumn. The next highest spot is occupied by White Supremacist Paul Ramsey, a.k.a. Ramzpaul. Ramsey was a regular blogger on the now-defunct Red Pill blog The Spearhead. Mike Cernovich, of whom we wrote yesterday occupies the third position. "Conflict is attention, and attention is influence," as Cernovich famously says. He runs another Manosphere blog titled Danger and Play.
Again, what we see is that a handful of degenerates in the so-called Manosphere are using technological gimmickry to promote their cult. If Trump is victorious next Tuesday, no doubt these same worthies will be crediting themselves with the accomplishment. In reality, however, they've contributed very little. As proof of that, note that Trump has not appointed a single one of their number to any actual positions of power. And it's up to true Conservatives to make certain that it stays that way.
What we see is the typical projection of political pygmies trying to present themselves as great leaders of men. This is the same sort of tactic they employ in all their social interactions from sexuality to business. It's all about presenting a façade that intimidates or deceives others into compliance with the Gamers' goals. Conservatives need not be fooled by these fanatics. It is simply a matter of lifting the curtain and chasing the pygmies back into the shadows.
The Red Pill Answer to Reason
'MAGA' is a term employed by the Trump Campaign, which is shorthand for his slogan, Make America Great Again. Never missing an opportunity to capitalize on a good thing, the Red Pill Cult has expropriated the term to camouflage their agenda among the unsuspecting general public. One Mike Cernovich, a notorious Internet troll who's been banned even from Fox News and Breitbart, has published a Game propaganda book titled MAGA Mindset. The book is supposedly a self-help manual using Donald Trump as a male role model; but according to most reviews it portrays Trump as a Game Cult 'Alpha Male' and teaches Game ideology disguised as biography.
MAGA Mindset was published by Castalia House, a Game Cult front headed by Vox Day and based in Finland. And Game gurus have been pushing Cernovich's book, the latest review came today from Matt Forney. Forney offers a free e-booklet of his own on his blog, revealingly titled The Online Hustler Quick-Start Guide. We get a good sense of where Cernovich is going from Forney's opening paragraph:
"Winners try to emulate Trump's successes; losers try to explain away Trump's successes as being a fluke or because of his 'inheritance'. It's the same reason why Trump's female haters are middling or ugly women whom neither he nor his sons would look at twice."
Right off the bat, we're fed the Red Pill. How exactly do they qualify Trump as a success worth emulating? Trump made a lot of money through sharp business decisions, surrounds himself with attractive women, became a celebrity, and is running for president. Our electoral history has seen men like this before; but who today remembers Horace Greeley, William Jennings Bryan, or Wendell Willkie? No, we emulate men whose character we admire. That is why better-known names like Ulysses S. Grant, William McKinley, and Franklin Roosevelt defeated the three named above.
The entire Game Cult's approach to cultivating the masculine character is premised on symbolism over substance. Forney says as much by quoting Cernovich:
"Building the Wall is a powerful symbol of Nationalism. It sends a powerful message that America has a right to exist in its own right. What is a nation without borders? It is nothing."
It doesn't seem to have occurred to Cernovich that Obama tried this very strategy in his so-called 'Pivot to Asia'. All of Obama's massive military demonstrations and the Hague ruling in the South China Sea ended up accomplishing nothing. China is now in control of the whole region, because Xi Jinping is man of deeds and not symbolism. Xi didn't need powerful symbols of nationalism, he claimed an uninhabited area for China, developed it for China, and defended it for China.
Forney, for his part, claims that MAGA Mindset's "genius is that it fuses nationalist political commentary with Cernovich's self-help-oriented perspective and approach." Which is a tacit admission that this book is simply Red Pill propaganda and has little to do with Trump's actual proposed policies. He continues:
"While MAGA Mindset states that Trump's success is in part due to him taking advantage of pre-existing trends (e.g. White anger at demographic replacement, irritation with political correctness, distrust of the mainstream media, etc.), no man could so effectively have seized the day as the Donald."
What Conservative would ever talk like this? This is not the language of a leader; but of an opportunist. Which fits well into the Red Pill scheme of things whereby the supposedly superior Alpha uses what he deems inferior peoples for his own purposes. Whether or not that describes Trump accurately is doubtful; but it does describe Cernovich fairly well. Cernovich came to prominence during the whole 'Gamer-Gate' sham of 2014. He is allegedly a high-profile attorney, although no one seems to know anything about his cases. Mostly he maintains his high-status lifestyle collecting alimony from his wealthy ex-wife: something that Manospherians take issue with women for doing.
Another particularly interesting thing about MAGA Mindset is its cover:
Which seemed eerily reminiscent of political artwork like this:
For the Red Pills, Art imitates Life once again.
If any actual Conservatives or Trump-supporters come across MAGA Mindset by accident, you know the product before you buy. Published in Finland by American expats; written by a dubious character connected with a sleazy, cult-like movement; this is certainly not the type of writing to win over skeptics of Trump. It's simply self-promotion by an organized group with an ulterior motive that uses MAGA as a selling-point.
With the Clinton Machine imploding by the day, it is beginning to become more likely that a Trump Administration is on the imminent horizon. Whether he or Hilary Clinton (or Tim Kaine) becomes the next president, one thing is for certain: the Neocon wing of the Republican Party has been---thankfully---irrevocably smashed. Politicians of the Bush, Rove, Cheney, Souter, and Sununu stripe are not coming back to plague us nationally anymore.
But Trump has not produced a unified party; nor does it seem to have been his intention to do so. The genuine Conservative element is still strong; but the political vacuum created by the downfall of the Neocons has given rise to the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right has largely been co-opted through a concerted effort. This same group will attempt to hijack Conservatism, the same way they've hijacked other movements and causes.
We have written much here about the rise of the dangerous cult called Game, and their so-called 'Red Pill' conversion process and its effects on radicalizing alienated men. The Game Cult began about 10 years ago, selling a phony sexual philosophy. It later took over the Men's Rights Movement, and created a huge Internet presence offering false Game-based, pseudo-Christianity. Lately, they've been employing the Web to set up propaganda outlets disguised as 'alternative media'. With the rise of Trump, they combined politically with Neo-Nazis and moved into the Alt-Right.
It's no coincidence that Game and Nazism have a natural affinity. Both are rooted in Evolutionary Psychology and both fetishize the 'Superman' or the 'Alpha', in Game parlance. Both are extremely reductionist in their logic: women are not men, and therefore Feminists; non-Whites are not White, and therefore threats to racial purity, etc. Many Neo-Nazis are also strong believers in the Red Pill Philosophy. In fact, the Red Pill cultists have already coined the term Cuckservative to designate anyone on the political Right who dares question their fanatical anti-American and anti-Christian beliefs and activities. Essentially what these groups seek to do is to replace Cultural Marxism with Cultural Fascism.
It's going to be the lot of American Conservatives during the next four years to expose and suppress this evil group, regardless of who is elected on November 8th. If there was ever a time when American Conservatives need to hold together and firm to their common principles, it is now.
