THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TWITTER TAKEOVER

       So Tech Lord Elon Musk this week engineered a hostile takeover of Twitter, a move which most Conservatives would otherwise criticize had another Corporate Oligarch done. Pundits are calling the move "a great victory for free enterprise and free speech," even though it concentrates an enormous amount of economic power and social influence into the hands of a small directorate. 

     Capitalizing on this latest round of accolades, Musk today criticized the Junta's creation of a Disinformation Governance Board within the Department of Homeland Security. He and other pundits, however, prudently omitted that our last 'Red Tsunamis' brought us approval of Bill Clinton's Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996 which 'deregulated' the point where the Media is now 90% controlled by half-dozen transnational Corporate enterprises. Or, that the creation of algorithms and data collection on social media was set up by the Bush Administration which has made de facto censorship of such platforms possible. Or, that a GOP-controlled Congress handed Obama a repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 which prohibited federal interference in the dissemination of domestic news, and so on. 

    Aside from being a very shady character, Musk doesn't exactly have strong Conservative credentials. A really insightful article was posted recently on Open Secrets which catalogues Musk and his Corporate enterprises' records of political financial support. Here are some interesting tidbits which haven't appeared in any of the hero-worshipping puff-pieces written by Neocons: 

    "Since 2002, Musk has given about equally to both Democratic and Republican candidates...The candidate who received the most money directly from Musk is former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel at $55,300... Of the presidential candidates he has financially supported, both were Democrats: Barack Obama in 2012 and Hillary Clinton in 2016."

    I'm not sure how Conservatives reconcile their belief that Musk is a great champion of the Right when the political figures whom he most admires seem to be as far to the Neo-Liberal Left as humanly possible. But as if that wasn't bad enough, the article further informs us that:

   "This election cycle, Tesla has given just over $70,000 to state candidates, almost all toward the California State Assembly or Senate. The only campaign the company has supported outside California so far this cycle is Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak’s (D) reelection bid with a $2,500 contribution. In the 2020 cycle, Tesla similarly supported predominantly state candidates in California. But the company also threw financial support behind a number of state candidates in Nevada, Hawaii and a handful of other states, as well as Washington Gov. Jay Inslee’s (D) reelection bid. In 2018, Musk supported California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) campaign, contributing a total $11,800 in May of that year. He also gave $5,400 to Sen. Dianne Feinstein."  

    Musk is CEO of Tesla and Space X---both of which have multi-billion dollar contracts with the Biden/Harris Junta. It shouldn't be surprising therefore that both companies are major Beltway lobbying powers. Tesla currently retains 18 lobbyists---half of whom are revolving-door former federal bureaucrats; while Space X commands 51 lobbyists, of whom 35 are former government employees. 

    Now the official narrative coming from such 'Conservative' news outlets like Fox News is that Musk represents an alternative of some kind to 'woke' Corporatism. It's probably only a coincidence that they would say so, considering that Rupert Murdoch's son James Murdoch sits on Tesla's Board of Directors. But that aside, we see Musk talking out of both sides of his mouth again: he's listed as the top donor to Bill Gates' very-woke Giving Pledge Campaign.

    Tesla's nominal CEO is Robyn Denholm, an Australian national and former executive in disgraced accounting firm Arthur Andersen, of Enron Scandal notariety. Denholm currently also serves as Chair of the Tech Council of Australia---a nation with some of the most brutally repressive laws against freedom of speech and communications in the West. This group recently signed on as technical advisor to the state of New South Wales: one of the worst lockdown tyrannies on the planet. This seems to be a bit at variance with Musk's alleged opposition to Scamdemic regimes---this and the fact that Musk profited massively during the lockdowns to the tune of tens of billions of dollars.

   Other interesting characters on Tesla's Board include WEF member Hiromichi Mizuno. Mizuno is also one of the architects of the UN's Principles for Responsible Investment Association, an organization heavily influenced by Klaus Schwab's Fourth Industrial Revolution. Ira Ehrenpreis, a 2014 inductee into the International Green Industry Hall of Fame, served as an advisor in Obama's Department of Energy. The Agency was headed then Ernest Moniz (unanimously confirmed by a Republican-controlled Senate), who formerly worked as an advisor for BP, General Electric, and the Saudi Oil monopoly (all WEF Top 100 Strategic Partners). Kathleen Wilson Thompson is also a top executive in Big Pharma conglomerate Walgreens----whose Vice-President is also a member of the WEF. Along with James Murdoch, Larry Ellison is the token Neocon on Tesla's Board. According to his biography:

   "In response to the September 11th terrorist attacks of 2001, Ellison made a controversial offer to donate software to the federal government that would have enabled it to build and run a national identification database and to issue identification cards...Ellison also was critical of NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden, saying that 'Snowden had yet to identify a single person who had been wrongly injured by the NSA's data collection.'" 

    Space X's CEO is WEF member Gwynne Shotwell, who was also part of the Atlantic Council's Captains of Industry series. The Atlantic Council is funded in part by the Junta's State Department, Soros' Open Society Foundation, and lobbyists for the Ukrainian Government. Luke Nosek, founder of WEF partner Pay Pal, also serves on the Board. Open Secrets shows that Nosek is a major donor to major RINOs: Bush Jr, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Lisa Murkowski and Dana Rohrbacher, etc. Steven Jurvetson, who was also a former Tesla Board member, was appointed by Obama to be Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship in 2016. Donald Harrison of Space X's Board also serves on the Board of WEF Strategic Partner Google, where he is in charge of global partnerships and corporate development. Board Member Antonio Gracias was Obama's Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship prior to Steven Jurvetson. Gracias is also a trustee of the shady Aspen Institute, a major think-tank heavily funded by the Gates Foundation and several other dubious organizations. Aspen's CEO is one Daniel Porterfield, a former Clinton bureaucrat; the other trustees of Aspen read like a Deep State Who's Who. 

   If Tesla and Space X are any indications of the Conservative trend that Twitter is supposedly going to take, we were probably better off under its old management. The examples above are specimens of the kinds of WEF shills, cringing Neocons, and Left-Wing crackpots that Musk is going appoint to the Board of Twitter---make no mistake about that. And there's little doubt that WEF banksters Blackrock and Morgan-Stanley---which combined hold more shares in Twitter than Musk---will have a lot to say about who does what. 

    The Twitter takeover is no victory for the Right. It's business as usual posing as a victory. 

THE MEANS OF THE ENEMY

        If anybody has been following the Controlled Opposition Conservative news outlets still, one would get two very clear messages. The first is that every problem that our nation is facing now is all because of the Junta and that nothing prior to January, 2021 actually took place; and the second is that voting in a pack of Never-Trump Neocon stooges is going to change everything for the better. 

     Let's look at Reality for a change. We're expected to believe that the same Party that threw the legitimate President and his supporters under the bus and have done absolutely nothing of any substance to combat voter fraud is going to present a viable alternative to the Regime. We're also expected to believe that a Regime who used every illegal and unconstitutional scheme in the book to achieve power will relinquish it to a legitimate populist movement again. 

    The Republican Party has no viable candidates, no action plan, and an extensive record of betrayals, sellouts, and compromises to contend with. The only political position they hold right now is that they aren't Democrats. Taking a page of the Left's tactics, they've been engaging in a lot of revisionist herstory lately. Pundit Victor Davis Hanson is among the worst of these, although Dennis Praeger gives him a good run for his money. Both pack articles full of pseudo-intellectual jargon that altogether say absolutely nothing except that "it's all Biden's fault."

   According to Hanson, inflation, energy dependence, political corruption, an emasculated military, failing schools and corrupt legal systems all started happening in America in 2021. This ought to be an insult to any Conservative's intelligence. Trump campaigned in 2016 on a platform of correcting these very problems. In fact, Hanson's arguments are on the level of Orange Man Bad except that he applies them to Biden, 

   Because the Republicans have no actual solutions, their leaders have been engaging in a number of publicity stunts, and worse they've been mimicking Leftist policies and putting a 'Conservative' label on them. Take for example Elon Musk's recent hostile takeover of Twitter. Conservative writers have been effusively praising this move---the same people who denounce 'woke' Corporations hijacking the Media. The real problem is that Corporate Oligarchs have too much control over the mass-media already, but of course nobody wishes to address that issue.

   Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has been grabbing headlines lately with these kinds of policy stunts---some of which have some very dangerous precedents involved. Despite the fact that Disney---one of the top 5 Media Conglomerates---has been pushing the homo agenda upon the world's youth for at least five years now, DeSantis and the Republican punditocracy have finally noticed that Disney is a problem. Their solution? Copy the Left and engage in Cancel Culture. Yes, the same people who criticized the Left's activism against Chick-Fil-A and Hobby Lobby decided to use the same tactics and own those Libtards by sticking it to Disney. 

  A better idea would be to ban all Corporations from lobbying and interfering in politics. But that's not in the interests of the GOP Establishment which rakes in millions in Corporate lobbying. This includes Disney, incidentally, which dumps considerable cash in GOP pockets themselves. But even so, the terms of DeSantis' policies are going to accomplish nothing; since Florida taxpayers are going to be liable for the debts Disney pays annually in exchange for the tax-exemption which was recently repealed. Meanwhile, the COVID dictatorship in Colorado has offered Disney a better deal to move to that State where they can continue all of their woke activism without hindrance. 

   DeSantis lately came up with another brilliant, this time allegedly cracking down on voter fraud. He's created a new police agency charged with monitoring elections. A special state police force overseeing voting---what could possibly go wrong with a plan like that? 

     It doesn't seem to have occurred to anybody on the Right that a future Democrat Administration might just abuse an agency like this. It's as though Conservatives have learned nothing from post-9/11 laws---almost all of which have been pressed into the service of the Junta---and which Obama eagerly expanded upon to further strip Americans of their Rights. 

   It would make more sense to go back to in-person voting with voter registration cards and paper ballots and bipartisan observers monitoring the vote count. That, and actually enforcing laws against voter fraud. But again, that policy doesn't suit vested interests like Diebold Technologies which operates and counts votes (and incidentally whose top shareholder at 14% is WEF/Great Reset architect Blackrock); or Dominion Voting Systems, which is a subsidiary of Staple Street Capital and is deeply connected with the neo-Fascist Regime of Justin Trudeau. The two owners of Staple Street are former employees of the Bush Family-run (and WEF partner) The Carlyle Group, and of Cerberus Capital Management. Cerberus' co-CEOs Steve Feinberg and Frank Bruno are major donors to the GOP Establishment and their board members include former Vice-President Dan Quayle and Bush Jr's former Treasury Secretary John Snow. Despite Republican claims that Dominion is heavily tied to voter fraud, it's doubtful that they will say too much about reining in Dominion.

    Conservatives need to drop their delusions, and come to grips with the fact that the Regime is not going away, that the President-in-Exile is not coming back, and that the Republican Party is worse than useless. Instead of engaging with the system we need to be disengaging from it and working to build parallel economies and societies outside (as much as possible) of the Regime's grasp. 

   

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND FAKE CONSERVATIVES

       During the manufactured crises of the last two years, one thing that has become apparent to anyone not too drugged-out to reason is that there really is no "Left-Right Paradigm in American sociopolitics anymore. At least this true at the levels of actual governance. The reality is that the only paradigm that actually exists are the Left and their Neocon enablers vs. a minority of traditionalists who hold no significant political or economic power. 

     Our culture is like a corrupt city run by far-away wealthy organized crime bosses. The Democrats are like the petty crooks and vice-peddlers, while the Republicans are like the cops who take bribes to look the other way while making speeches about the Administration being soft on crime. They keep the general public divided with these kinds of ruses: stirring up outrage against each other while securing the public's obedience to them with various forms of dependence and distraction. 

    Neither side is above using human beings as pawns or scapegoats in this scheme, usually some group or individual who is outside of any real power. Take for example, illegal immigration. Nothing has actually been done about this in decades, but it's always an issue because immigrants are an easily scapegoated class. 

   Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Neocon who's owned by the Bush Machine has come up with a solution to the 'Border Crisis.' He's decided to rent buses, packed with illegal immigrants, and dump them, like garbage, at the Washington, D.C. bus station. And people say that there's no such thing as Compassionate Conservatism. After all, they're shipped in nice air-conditioned buses instead of cattle-trailers. And I'm sure that the drivers get bonus pay, too. 

   Abbott is now up to ten busloads of human cargo and the Neocon punditocracy can't contain their effusive praise over such real leadership. Their supporters are equally giddy with excitement; delighted that Abbott is owning those Libtards while somehow forgetting that these are human beings used as props for this show. While it is true that Left-Wing Corporate scumbags like George Soros and the DNC paid off Central American governments to pack their surplus populations on buses and send them here in the first place (in what the MSM romantically termed migrant caravans); it's really no justification for the Right to behave like they do. Embracing the cynicism and contempt for human dignity that the Left regularly displays really highlights the uncomfortable truth that the Right---morally speaking---is no better than they are. Both parties claim to oppose human trafficking, but don't seem to mind it when doing so suits their agendas. 

     “By busing migrants to Washington, D.C., the Biden Administration will be able to more immediately meet the needs of the people they are allowing to cross our border,” Abbott sneered to the MSM last week. 

     Unfortunately for Abbott, Texas is going to bear the burden anyway. The District of Columbia is legally a Federal Territorial government and, as such, is funded directly by the Federal Government. In other words, American tax dollars are going to cover the increased welfare burden that Texas is bestowing upon D.C.. Even a spokeswoman for the Junta laughed off the measure as a "publicity stunt." 

   “I’m not aware of what authority the governor would be doing that under​.​ I think it’s pretty clear this is a publicity stunt​,”  Jen Psaki noted. “His own office admits that a migrant would need to voluntarily be transported, and then he can​’t​ compel them to because​,​ again, enforcement of our country’s immigration laws lies with the federal government and not a state​." 

    Now there is an interesting detail that the 'Conservative' media seems to leave out: that the immigrants have to volunteer for the trip. Either way, it doesn't work well for Abbott, since either he's forcing them to go illegally or he's subsidizing the problem by dispersing the immigrants all over the country. 

   “President Biden refuses to come to the southern border to see the chaos he has created. So, we’re taking the border to him,” Abbott further pontificated in a Fox News interview. “Texas should not have to bear the burden of the Biden Administration’s failure to secure our border.” Maybe Abbott should take up the issue with the Republican Party itself. President Trump's proposals to secure the border, we should recall, were routinely blocked by a GOP-lead Congress. 

   The political grandstanding aside, the truly disturbing thing about this policy is the implied inhumanity of it. Truthfully, I fail to see any material difference in Conservative attitudes towards illegal immigrants and Leftist attitudes towards Loyalty Vaxx dissidents. Both seem to agree that freezing people out of society is a morally acceptable policy. 

   The best way to deal with illegal immigration is twofold. First, we should abolish paramilitary units like ICE and replace them with a civil Immigration service like we used to have. People who come here with a job, a sponsor, or visible means of support should be given permission with the least amount of bureaucratic arrogance and red tape. Those are undesirable for various reasons should be deported without interference from social workers and administrative judges. The second thing we should do is deal with Soros-type enterprises through the State Department. We should make it clear to the representatives of these various Banana Republics that any further foreign-funded 'caravans' would be answered with reverse 'immigration' from America---who would be arriving on a battleship. In the past, that was always a very effective deterrent against the larcenous tendencies that some Latin American leaders were wont to display. 

      It is seriously doubtful however that either Party desires serious immigration reform. It's always been a curious thing: how ICE is so adept at catching migrant farm workers and impoverished refugees, but violent gang members like MS-13 always seem to get through the dragnet. It's also amazing how travelers coming to and going from the United States are subject to degrading and invasive inspections; but somehow narcotics and weapons always seem flow back and forth across the border with very little interference. It's also unexplained how drug cartels flourish on the Mexican Border while our government has refused repeatedly to give the Mexican Military resources that they've asked for. We seem to have plenty of resources to help Ukraine's attempts to seize Russian territories or illegally occupy the Republics of Lughansk and Donetsk; but we never seem to have enough resources to share with Mexico in defending our common borders. 

    A suspicious mind might indeed to start to think that maybe there are interests involved who want the status quo. Human traffickers, drug smugglers, and Black Market weapons' dealers are, of course, happy with the arrangement. But there are also a few corporate hands in the till, too. When Abbott's mentor, Bush Jr. created ICE, he and Cheney outsourced the warehousing of illegal immigrants to private corporations. The two major recipients of federal funding for immigrant jails are CoreCivic, whose CEO Damon Hininger, and the GEO Group, whose CEO George Zoley, just coincidentally happen to be major donors to Republican candidates. According to Open Secrets, CoreCivic maintains 14 Beltway lobbyists, 9 of whom are revolving-door former federal bureaucrats.  GEO Group maintains 18 lobbyists, of which 15 are former federal employees. Needless to say, federal allocations to these groups have a built-in insurance that these Corporate looters will get their share of immigrants to fill their jails. Obviously, immigration reform is of no benefit to them either. 

   Let's see if we can guess who the top stockholder in both of these two companies is...

    Yep. One of the WEF's top 'Strategic Partners'---our old friends at Blackrock. Blackrock owns about 15% of CoreCivic and almost 14% of the GEO Group. Is it any wonder that Schwab and Soros are so encouraging of America's current border policy? And here we all thought that these woke corporations were solely in it for equality's sake. 

  It should be noted that the institutions which these banksters, corporate robber barons, and Beltway lobbyists operate are funded and managed with little to no Congressional oversight. Not that oversight would matter much in today's political climate; but like many programs initiated during the Bush Jr. Administration, the operational levels---including funding---are buried in 'National Security' budgets which aren't open for discussion. During the Obama years, an organization connected with the Quaker sect who ministers to incarcerated people wrote:

   “Without a single vote in Congress, officials across three administrations: created a new classification of federal prisons only for immigrants; decided that private companies would run the facilities; and filled them by changing immigration enforcement practices. One-hundred percent of these facilities, known as “Criminal Alien Requirement” (CAR) prisons, are operated by private corporations." None of these facilities, incidentally, are subject to oversight by the Federal Bureau of Prisons. I think it's fairly safe to conclude from all of this that what Governor Abbott and his party bosses really want is further funding from the Junta to build more Corporate-owned prisons. 

   The reality is that neither party gives a hoot about any of the problems associated with illegal immigration and neither party has the slightest intention of any meaningful reform. The Democrats will let more illegals in---which in turn necessitates the need for more private prisons. The Republicans will profess to crackdown on immigration---which will also require more private prisons. Nothing will be solved, while Americans keep pointing the finger at each other and the Elites laugh themselves all the way to the bank. 

   

THE BIG 4-2-0

    For those not keeping up with Pop Culture, the term '420' has become a slang term for marijuana use. Today is 4/20 and, in my State where pot use is just about the only thing that's still actually legal, all of the stores catering to that product had sales. Here in the smallish village where I live---in a 'Red County'---our local dispensary was no different, with a 35% discount. 

    This afternoon, after visiting a local bar & grill, I sat on the bench outside under the awning because a rainstorm came up. This place is right next to the dispensary. I would wager that in the 1/2 hour I sat there, I could have clocked three to five people entering or exiting the dispensary every single minute. It was so crowded that they had an employee working as a doorkeeper managing a line outside. Bear in mind that this is a town of less than 10,000 people in a Republican county and this was going on during a thunderstorm in 40 degree weather. 

  And people wonder why we talk so much here about America as a nation of Addicts. If this is a sample of Mainstream America, it is no mystery why the Nation is in the condition that it's in. Combined with the levels of prescription psych-dope and illegal street-drugs Americans consume, it's not unreasonable to assume that at least half of the people one encounters in an average day are under the influence of some narcotic. In fact, in most large cities, it's fairly obvious. 

     Those who grew up in the mid-to-late 20th Century probably experimented with marijuana; but if they haven't been following the culture in awhile, it should be understood that there is a considerable difference between what was covertly available then and what is widely available today. The marijuana plant has varying degrees of effect depending upon what part of the plant is utilized. What we saw then was typically harvested from the leaves, which have a mild narcotic effect. The flowers and the resins contain the potent oils: in those days that was usually processed by traffickers into Hashish. The analogous difference is roughly the same between Opium and Heroin. Overdoses and side-effects from raw Opium are fairly rare: playing with Heroin or Fentanyl can lead to severe addiction and are often lethal.

   Almost all commercially-available marijuana products today are made from the flowers and resins, meaning they have about the same potency as Hashish. THC, the chemical which is the active component in marijuana was typically found in levels of around 2% during the mid-to-late 20th Century. Studies conducted during the Trump Administration showed THC concentrations of as high as 28% in today's commercially available products. That sustained use of these highly-concentrated substances have an adverse impact on cognition is well-documented.

   "A number of studies have determined an association between Cannabis use and brain changes involving structures governing memory and emotional processing, including reduced volume of the hippocampus, temporal cortex, insula, and orbitofrontal cortex. Although many of these changes appear to be dose-related, some morphologic changes have been reported among young recreational users without Cannabis dependence. This has resulted in an understandable concern about the effects of Cannabis on the brains of young people with limited exposure; however, it is not yet clear to what extent detected brain changes are pathological and reflect functional deficits. Recent research using newer neuroimaging modalities provides preliminary support of Cannabis use associated with white matter changes that, in turn, are correlated with cognitive impairment. One study comparing low-potency Cannabis and high-potency cannabis users with and without first episode psychosis found a significant effect of Cannabis potency on disturbances in white matter microstructural organization in the corpus callosum. These findings provide sufficient cause for concern that structural brain changes associated with cognitive impairment are more likely to occur with high-potency cannabis use."

     About 35 million American teens and legal adults use these products regularly, and another 20 million use them infrequently on a yearly basis, according to the Corporate Media's own admissions. As if cognitive impairment wasn't enough, the potential for increased rates of outright mental illness have likewise been documented. The study notes: 

   "Based on longitudinal studies published over the past 30 years, it is clear that using Cannabis at a young age (age <15 to 18) increases the risk of developing a psychotic disorder. This association appears to be dose-dependent, with studies consistently demonstrating that psychosis risk increases with greater frequency of Cannabis use. The accumulated evidence to date is strong enough to view the psychotic potential of Cannabis as a significant public health concern. If risk of psychosis is proportional to the amount of Cannabis used as measured by frequency, it follows that this risk might be affected similarly by Cannabis potency...The findings from these 4 studies suggest that the increased risk of psychosis with Cannabis is proportional to overall exposure, determined by both frequency of use and Cannabis potency."

    Another set of studies produced during the Obama Administration concluded that these higher-potency drugs have a significant link between consistent use during pregnancy and lowering of IQ levels---and not only prenatally, but pre-existing IQ levels decline in biological adults over years of continuous use. Is it any wonder we see today increasing dissociation from reality, lack of even simple reasoning skills, and what many have termed, mass psychosis?

     Not only are these high-potency cannabis products crippling the American mind, there are other adverse social factors which are being examined. There are potential links to higher suicide rates and declining fertility in both men and women. Naturally, though, the average Ameroboob will deny that prolific narcotics abuse has any effect on our social decline. If Americans wanted to face reality, they wouldn't be drug addicts in the first place. 

    The Elites benefit from the social effects of drug abuse, however. Not only does high-potency drugs like commercial marijuana produce a dumbed-down and docile populace, the potential for addiction makes a population less willing to resist lest their supplies be cut off. Wall Street freebooters, by their own admission, dominate the commercial marijuana industry; and it is certainly no accident that they prudently exempted marijuana dispensaries from most lockdown mandates. According to Investopedia, there is big money in Marijuana Stocks these days. The best performing stock is a company called Innovative Industrial Properties, which WEF leader Blackrock owns 14% of shares. Together with financial oligarchs Vanguard and State Street, 35% of the company is under the control of these three trusts. Blackrock also holds dominant interests in industry leaders GrowGeneration and Hydrofarm. A major share of the industry comes from corporations in Trudeau's Canada, but given the lobbying Big Pot puts into both political parties, it's doubtful we'll be hearing media horror-stories about the drug influx across our Northern border anytime soon. Canopy Growth Corp. spent the most last year on lobbying at nearly $1 million alone, with 13 lobbyists, 4 of whom are revolving-door former federal bureaucrats. It's somewhat sad to reflect that marijuana was actually safer product and a less corrupt industry when the Mob was still running it. 

    The reality that Americans refuse to face is that changing this Party or that one; or passing this or that law will change nothing. We need to change as a people. We need to realize that the same interests who pushed the Scamdemic and unsafe Mask and Loyalty Vaxx Mandates are the same ones pushing dangerously enhanced recreational drugs and telling us that the safety of such toxins is settled science. 

      

      

    

    

THE POST-EASTER WORLD

     Another Easter Sunday has come and gone. To be honest, I stayed home and had a quiet observation of the holiday. Church just doesn't feel the same anymore after two years of various lockouts and mask-mandate boycotts. If Western Democracy is now only a shadow of its former self, Western Christianity is a ghost of what it once was. 

    There really is no point in trying to evade the issue any longer; the Church has proven itself during the last two years to be every bit as compromised and corrupted as secular society. According to statistics compiled by the University of Chicago's General Social Survey, we see a trend that follows most of the political shift we've witnessed since the New World Order was announced in 1990.

  Americans identified as:

     1972: Protestant 62% ;Catholic 27%; Other: 6%; None 6%

     1982: Protestant 62%; Catholic 27%; None: 7%; Other: 5%

Then this:

     1992: Protestant 61%; Catholic 26%; None 8%; Other 5%

     2002: Protestant 54%; Catholic 25%; None 14%; Other 7%

     2012: Protestant 49%; Catholic 25%; None 19%; Other 7%

     2022: Protestant 48%; Catholic 23%; None 22%; Other 7%

  It shouldn't be much of a surprise that the biggest shift occurred around the same time we saw the Clinton Administration and their Republican enablers in Congress oversaw outright purges and revolutionizing of our education system. Church leaders, like the rest of American Conservatives simply rolled their eyes and looked the other way; this is the result. If anyone is inclined to doubt this, let's examine what other recent surveys say about the demographics of Christian America:

  WW2 Generation (b. 1918-1945) Christian 84%; Other 6%; None 9%

  Boomers (b. 1946-1962) Christian 76%; Other 5%; None 18%

  Gen X (b.1963-1985) Christian 71%; Other 3%; None 25%

  Millennials (b.1986-2000) Christian 62%; Other 4%; None 29%

  Gen Z (b.2001-2019) Christian 56%; Other 7%; None 34%

   In the mid-90s Americans collectively decided that it takes a village to raise a child---the family and the church became irrelevant; radicalized educators and social workers should do the job. Now, of course, Christians and Conservatives are clutching their bowties and pretending that they didn't know what was going on; that the Culture War just started last year when the Junta seized power.

   

     Protestant denominations as late as the 1970s and 1980s had a significant sociopolitical impact on American Culture. Since the 1990s, they seem to have split into two principal movements: a sort of 'woke' Rainbow Churchianity and its antipode, a Red-Pilled 'go-along-to-get-along' Neoconservative faction. Neither side emphasizes the spiritual element of humanity, nor encourages faith and personal growth. Protestantism in general seems to have replaced the concept of Divine Sovereignty with Party Loyalty. 

    Catholicism, as we've noticed as well, has been characterized recently by a formerly proactive Pope who seems to have disappeared during the Crisis of the last two years. In 2019, Pope Francis---then 83 years old---became ill and two years later underwent an unspecified surgery that many thought at the time was life-threatening. Since that time, considerable Church affairs are being delegated to Cardinals: some of whom are of very dubious character. Two of the major organizations active in the Vatican right now are the St. Gallen Group and the Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican. 

    The Saint Gallen Group---known colloquially by many Catholics as the Saint Gallen Mafia---is a conclave of so-called 'progressive' bishops and cardinals who meet yearly and essentially formulate strategies for undermining traditional Catholicism.  Their name comes from their headquarters in St. Gallen, Switzerland which (just coincidentally we're sure) is about a half-hour's drive from the World Economic Forum headquarters in Davos. The group was founded in 1971, the same year that Klaus Schwab published his manifesto, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, no doubt another 'coincidence.' The late Cardinal Carlo Martini was one of the main organizers of the St. Gallen Group. Julia Meloni, a reporter with Life Site News had this to say of Martini's character in 2018:

      "Martini eerily called himself an 'ante-pope' and a 'precursor and preparer for the Holy Father.' Martini was the leading antagonist to Popes John Paul II and Benedict—a Jesuit famous for groaning that the Church was '200 years behind.' In Night Conversations with Cardinal Martini, he cringed at the major damage caused by Humanae Vitae. The Church spoke too much about the sixth commandment and sin. He said legal abortion was, ultimately, a positive thing...

     "Martini said that in preparation for the 2005 papal election, he and others discussed the new answers that the next pope would have to give on sexuality and Communion for adulterers...The Church was tired, its rites were pompous... In 1999, Martini had a dream of hurtling the Church into 'permanent synodality'—that is, permanent revolution. The decentralized, synodal Church would foment changes on marriage, sexuality, penitential practice, priestly celibacy, women in the Church, ecumenism."

    Archbishop Carlo Vigano stated recently that: "If we identify the World Economic Forum as a private lobby that has placed its followers in the most important posts of national and international public institutions in order to impose the globalist agenda against the will of the citizens, it is certainly fitting to see a parallel with the St. Gallen Mafia. In a similar way, this cabal of conspirators also placed its agents in the Roman Curia and in the peripheral organs of the Church, just as it imposed the conciliar agenda against the will of the faithful...We are facing a global coup that involves both civil society and the Church. Both are infiltrated and controlled by characters who use their power and the authority that derives from it, not for the purposes of the institutions they govern, but in order to destroy them. This crisis of authority must be denounced, because the action of those who have reached the highest levels of leadership both of nations and of the Church is a subversive and criminal act."

    Like our contemporary American Republican leadership, Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis share a portion of the blame for compromising continually with this evil group and tolerating its existence. Good men doing nothing has brought to us to where we are both spiritually and sociopolitically.

   The Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican--- or The Guardians as they rather ominously refer to themselves--- is the secular version of the St. Gallen Group: it was formed during the Scamdemic of 2020 and had its first meeting with Pope Francis shortly before the Junta formally seized power in Washington DC. 

   The Guardians are composed the leaders of 27 Corporations and NGOs: 9 of which are among the WEF's 100 'Strategic Partners'; two others headed by WEF protegees, and combined they represent more than $10.5 trillion in assets under management, companies with over $2.1 trillion of market capitalization, and 200 million workers in over 163 countries. The Guardians' stated purpose is to "make actionable commitments aligned with the World Economic Forum Business Council's Pillars for sustainable value creation — People, Planet, Principles of Governance, and Prosperity—and to advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals."

   The Governess of the Guardians is Lynn Forester de Rothschild, formerly a WEF 'young leader' award winner in 1995. Her husband is Evelyn de Rothschild, a British financier and media mogul. It is the third marriage for both parties: they actually spent their honeymoon at the White House in 1998 at the invitation of then co-President Hilary Clinton. Forester is a major supporter and admirer of Hilary Clinton, which has led to some unsavory rumors about the personal relationship between the two. 

   The WEF has never made an especial secret of the fact that they intend to infiltrate organized religion and 'reset' that along with the rest of society.

     The Role of Religion in their New World Order, of course, has nothing to do with the recognition of God as a Higher Power, or a belief in Moral Absolutes, or with the ideal of Man as created in the Image of God, to Whom he is ultimately accountable. To condense all of the WEF hyperbole on faith, what they are actually describing is bending religion to their ideology in the same way that they bend government to it. Father Augusto Zampini Davies, a Vatican bureaucrat, recently wrote an article for the WEF explaining the Scamdemic's effect on society. "Now, we must embrace the moral imperative of radical change not just because it is right, but because it is the only practical course of action that can save the world from a worse fate in years to come. Fortunately, recent events have shown us that rapid and radical change is in fact possible on a mass scale. Our challenge now is to channel and build upon it." 

   One can see many specimens of these proposed changes on the WEF website. Among their top articles are "All Women Islamic Choir Smashes Gender Taboos in Egypt" and "A Gay Imam's Story:The Dialogue is Open in Islam" and "How Religious Groups and Services Have Adapted During the Coronavirus Pandemic" and "Islam, Judaism, and Christianity Come Together Over COVID-19." In 2020, the WEF launched a campaign of 400 religious leaders from 35 countries to make homo 'marriage' universally legal. 

   The Eastern Churches, called the Orthodox, have largely resisted the levels of corruption that the Western Churches are facing---although the Elites are working feverishly to exploit the 'Ukraine Crisis' as a vehicle to sow division and whip up anti-Russian hysteria to curb Orthodoxy's growing influence in the West. 

   Many pundits on the American Right opine today that faith and traditional religion are under attack. As usual, they miss the point. Faith and our Western Christian culture have been under attack for at least three decades, and there isn't very much that we can do about it at this late stage of decline. The best that we can do is to cultivate our own faith as individuals, not succumb to the State of Denial that most Conservatives are living in,  and prepare ourselves for the coming onslaught. 

THE CRISIS ON THE NORTHERN BORDER

      Activities in the Terrorist Police State once known as the Dominion of Canada have slid out of the general public's fractional attention spans---not that most Americans could even find Canada on a map anyway. While the Corporate Media has been deflecting attention to Eastern Europe, the Trudeau Regime has continued consolidation of its power, including suppression of press freedom, persecution of dissidents, and Crimes Against Humanity in general. There have been stories coming through the press filters, however, such as a recent report from The Simon Wiesenthal Foundation showing that the Canadian Military has been training and equipping Neo-Nazi militias in Ukraine since the 2014 Coup. 

   “It’s the responsibility of the Canadian Defense Ministry to know exactly who they are training." said Foundation spokesman Ephraim Zuroff, “There is no question that there are neo-Nazis in different forms in Ukraine, whether they are in the Azov regiment or other organizations. It’s not Russian propaganda, far from it.These people are neo-Nazis. There is an element of the ultra-right in Ukraine and it’s absurd to ignore it.”

   Véronique Sabourin, a Captain in the very-inclusive Canadian Military, brushed off the accusations, saying that "all Canadian military members training Ukrainian troops were given information to help them recognize patches and insignia associated with right-wing extremism. Ukraine is responsible for vetting its own personnel," she added, "There is no burden of proof on the CAF to demonstrate this beyond a reasonable doubt."

   Such a statement might lead a suspicious mind to wonder again where all of those 'enforcers' that Trudeau recently employed to crush the February protests actually came from. The Ottawa Regime has spent nearly $1 billion on 'aid' to Ukraine and it's not inconceivable that Trudeau might have called in a favor from Zelensky.

     Canada also has been at the forefront of ushering in the Great Reset, and their official denials about this fact are laughable. Life Site News had an article yesterday about leaked World Economic Forum documents which revealed that Chrystia Freeland---one of Trudeau's top apparatchiks---was deeply involved in setting up the blueprint for the implementation of employing the Scamdemic in the interests of international corporate government. Freeland holds both the posts of Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister in the Trudeau Regime; and as such is responsible for seizing financial assets of Canadian dissidents and many other Crimes Against Humanity. Freeland also sits on the WEF Board of Trustees and formerly worked as writer for pro-Ukrainian corporate interests in various financial journals. She has been banned as an undesirable alien from entry into Russia since the Soviet Era when the KGB caught her spying on behalf of foreign financial interests involved in the Black Market. 

    Freeland's WEF report was announced at the 2021 meeting in Davos: “The response to COVID-19 must not, therefore, be allowed to reproduce or perpetuate existing social norms that fuel inequalities and social unrest. This applies to the online sphere, notably as technology has come to permeate everyday life at an accelerated pace in places than was the case before."

   Which statement clearly shows that the Trudeau Regime was planning actively to overthrow Canadian democracy over a year before the protests, and that the autocratic response to the Scamdemic was wholly premeditated. 

   “Just as environmentally conscious policies and practices are a prerequisite to sustainable development, so is achieving gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls. intersectional gender-based analyses are critical to ensuring that our actions have maximum effectiveness and impact.”

   It must be recalled that this agenda was drafted shortly after the well-orchestrated race-riots in the US during the Summer of 2020. The Trudeau Regime---BTW with the full complicity of Church leadership---locked down churches and suspended freedom of assembly while simultaneously conducting an ethnic purge of Canadian Culture. 

  Trudeau and his henchmen have repeatedly dismissed any connection to the Great Reset agenda in spite of the fact that it has become so apparent that even mainstream media outlets in Canada were at one time questioning it. Klaus Schwab himself publicly boasted about his control over the Canadian Government. The issue came up in the House of Commons during the February Protests, but was shut down by the Speaker for debate.

   This pervert who's dressed like a 19th-Century Scottish schoolgirl and sitting on a throne, is Canadian House of Commons Speaker, Anthony Rota. Rota is the former mayor of North Bay, Ontario---a town which had some rather suspicious activities surrounding it during the suppression of the Truckers' Protests. Since that vicious crackdown occurred, Canada has never returned confiscated property to the dissidents, nor has it lifted controls over social media reporting on protests. It is still illegal to assist dissidents financially and there are reports that their homes have been targeted by social services for the removal of children. Canada has imposed strict border controls that restrict anyone without proof of the Loyalty Vaxx to enter the country; or as Transportation Minister Omar Alghabra put it: "Drivers must now get the shot or stop driving over the border.” The Regime has likewise imposed a ban on foreign purchases of residential property and has a massive gun-confiscation program planned for the near future.  

   It's highly unlikely that we'll see the same level of outrage directed at Canada which we're seeing aimed currently at Russia, China, etc. This is especially true given the symbiotic nature of the Corporate-Government Complex running both nations since NAFTA was imposed during the 1990s. Big Oil has been especially prominent in this regard, although other major interests flow through Canada as well. It's noteworthy that when we see numbers like these our elected officials receive from Big Oil why protecting the pipelines (and the profit margins) will surpass any concern for human rights:

    Senator Manchin, in fact, recently made a trip to Canada to secure even more oil from Trudeau and his pals. The House also finds itself a fair recipient of Big Oil's profits:

   Before we hear any talk about a Red Tsunami coming to save us from Trudeau-style Corporate Fascism, please take note of the number of 'R's behind most of these recipients' names. Canada is also registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act and spent $12 million on Beltway lobbyists last year alone.

   The most unsettling thing about the situation in Canada as far as we Americans are concerned is that their present is very likely our future. As things stand now in Washington, we on a solid trajectory to be where they are within a matter of years---if not months. The mass uprising that shook the West a few weeks ago probably sped up Canada's timetable. But the unmistakable message here is that the Elites don't intend to back down from their agenda, and Trudeau has shown us the lengths to which they will go to sustain it. We still don't know how many people were actually killed during the protests, but there were casualties. Imagine witnessing a massacre like the one in Ottawa and not even seeing it on the news: that's a taste of what life under totalitarianism really looks like. It should be a wake-up call to anyone who still cares about their liberty.

   

      

THE SCAMDEMIC'S THIRD ROUND

     So this month, we're entering the third year of the temporary State of Emergency because of a 'pandemic' that nobody yet has proven actually was real. True, there have been lifting of certain restrictions, but---as I predicted---they are starting to come back. Many restrictions in several key sectors were never lifted at all: the Junta has left travel restrictions, vaxx requirements, etc. in place; as have most of Corporate America and Academia, Incorporated. And suddenly there's been outbreaks among the Junta's top officials and other various celebrities.

   A culture as heavily addicted to narcotics as our's is prone to panic. Likewise, they tend to have short memories. Many have forgotten how different things were as recently as 2019 and have settled into embracing the narrative and the 'New Normal.' A few still cling to the illusion that there will ever be a 'return to normalcy'---those who think so ought to consider how much we resemble say, 1999. There was never any intention that would 'return to normal' any more today than there was after the 9/11 Attacks. In fact, a whole generation has grown up under the 'temporary restrictions' imposed upon us in 2001. The Elites have learned this pattern of manipulation very well: as soon as protests against the restrictions start mounting, they ease the rules and then spring a new 'crisis' upon us. When that subsides, they go back to their repressive rules for health and safety reasons. We haven't yet reached the outright Police State levels of Canada or Australia, but we're being psychologically primed to accept it. 

   In 2020, the Scamdemic temporarily stopped for a series of race riots. In 2021, it stopped because of threats of right-wing extremism, and price inflation. This year, it's slowing down because of a war in Eastern Europe. All of these intervals give the Elites an opportunity to consolidate their power before a new 'surge' or 'variant' in the Mystery Virus appears, and then dissent is silenced, and other new rules imposed against the First Amendment. 

     Russia's discovery of US-funded biological weapons laboratories in Ukraine has opened up considerable controversy (everywhere outside of the Anglosphere) about the activities of these Deep State operatives. No sooner had this come out that the Corporate Media suddenly discovered a potential scandal of Hunter Biden's business dealings there---while at the same time moved rather quickly to suppress Russian involvement in the United Nations Human Rights Council. The Biden Scandal is all another distraction, of course. Nothing will come of it, and the Republicans 'investigating' it will naturally omit any references to their own complicity in the shady dealings that went on in Ukraine. 

    In dealing with tracing the Scamdemic, China has run into the same problems. Chinese Intelligence has accumulated proof that COVID-19 was present near the US Bioweapons Facility as early as September 2019, yet diplomats from the US and their assorted satrapies have been blocking any UN investigations. Chinese scientists have learned recently that the Ukrainian biolabs were also experimenting on Coronaviruses in bats. In fact, when the virus allegedly leaked from the laboratory in Wuhan, Chinese authorities learned that the research material had been taken back to the US. The Chinese Ministry of Health requested that Fauci return the materials so that they could analyze the outbreak, but were refused for "National Security Reasons."

    The timeline that China is suggesting is interesting. Dr. Kerry Mullis, the Nobel Prize winning medical specialist who invented the device employed for COVID testing, died under mysterious circumstances in August 2019. Dr. Mullis was a fierce critic of the Academic Mafia and the prostitution of Science to Corporate agendas. Then, about a month after the Ft. Detrick outbreaks alleged by China, the WEF---led by their top operative Bill Gates, held a series of exercises at their infamous Event 201 circle. About another month later, Fauci's team departed China with the evidence of what their researches actually entailed. 

    No sooner had China announced the breakout than the 'experts' assured us that the virus came from Chinese eating bats they'd bought from street vendors in Wuhan. The Ameroboobs were too busy panicking and stocking up on bath tissue and hand sanitizers that were selling on Ebay at inflated prices to think about the sheer absurdity of that claim. There was also a run on masks at the time, which the Government 'experts' at first discouraged, then mandated as soon as Honeywell's production of masks went into overdrive. The First Amendment was shredded as neatly as the 9/11 hysteria shredded the 5th, 9th, and 10th Amendments and the so-called 'Drug War' shredded the 4th, 6th, and 8th. 

     Of course in today's atmosphere of Cancel Culture and Americans' proclivity to panic first and think later, anything coming out of the Russian or Chinese Media is dismissed as propaganda. Because the Anglosphere Media outlets never lie, conceal the truth, or answer to the WEF oligarchs who own them. In fact, it's such self-evident propaganda that Big Tech wants to block them from Western audiences--- though a more reasonable population might inquire why obvious lies need to be suppressed. It's quite strange considering that during WW2, we could listen freely to German and Japanese radio broadcasts; and all during the Cold War, one could get Soviet and Red Chinese literature here easily. Back in the days when Dead White Males ran things, it was believed that censorship made us no better than our enemies; and besides, letting them state in their own words their goals and policies made a better-informed public to resist them. 

   Those totalitarian regimes practiced censorship, and it was generally assumed that the suppression of information was to cover up the truth. But that was then, this is now: and our Elites presume the opposite because truth (to them) is whatever they say it is. The Angloboobs of today have a mental blockage on this point too. The Pandemic couldn't be scam, because the Government has never lied to us before about National Security or employed such pretexts to seize more power and profit for themselves and their friends. The Media couldn't lie about our culture; just because their narratives on things like marijuana and homosexuality have reversed 180 degrees during the last decade doesn't mean that not purveyors of bedrock truths. And, of course, we can always change things with Elections---the fact that every election since 1992 has been tainted with corruption doesn't mean the next one won't be fair and transparent, right? We can believe them this time.