CANADA AS CONTROLLED OPPOSITION

         In a Managed Democracy such as we have had in the United States for the last few decades, we recognize the the concept of a Controlled Opposition mostly in relation to domestic politics. It's very much obvious here in the U.S., where both political parties, the Corporate Media, and most of Academia make up the Managerial Class administering public affairs on behalf of the Oligarchy. Controlled Opposition is defined as sowing establishment-approved narratives which, superficially, run counter to the Official Narrative. In our political system, the two factions of the Uniparty (Republicans and Democrats) take turns acting both as the purveyors of the Official Narrative and as Controlled Opposition. 

      For example, the Democrats today pose as Opposition. This week, however, we saw high-level meetings between White House 'fixer' Jared Kushner and Congressional 'opposition' leader Hakeem Jeffries to discuss coordinated efforts in case the Oligarchs decide to install the Democrats as leaders of the Legislative Branch in November. NPR exposed yesterday that Illinois Governor Pritzker---who boasts about Illinois being a 'Sanctuary State' and who routinely denounces Immigration Policy---is collaborating with ICE behind the scenes. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has been playing similar games for public consumption, and many other examples abound. 

       

      With the abject military failure of the Globalists in both the Persian Gulf and Ukraine,---along with plummeting public support for the Zionist State in Palestine---there has been an evident growing concern among the Oligarchs. They fear that this public support internationally might start turning towards countries that oppose the New Order; specifically China, Iran, and Russia. This situation has necessitated the rise of a Controlled Opposition in Geopolitics. Canada---a country almost wholly controlled by Globalist interests---apparently is being promoted as the fake counterweight to declining trust in the American-driven Oligarchy.

      The current Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, has engaged in a phony feud with the US Deep State since assuming the office as Tienanmen Trudeau's hand-picked successor. Connected with the Global Banking Cartels, Carney was noteworthy in 2022 as the architect of Trudeau's brutal policy of 'debanking' and financially crippling protesters who demonstrated against Trudeau's repressive Scamdemic policies. A former member of the WEF's Board of Trustees, Carney took to the microphone at that organization's annual meeting this year to condemn Trump in a speech that suspiciously went viral. The latest flare-up allegedly is over a trade deal between the two countries. 

      

       Carney's opposite number in the White House is Soros-Operative and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. In 1992, Bessent and Soros reaped a huge profit crashing the British Pound Sterling. In 1998, Carney, then a Goldman-Sachs Operative, was involved in the crash of the Russian Ruble. Both are birds of a feather, so to speak.

       What really ought to concern us is not all of the bluster and mudslinging going on between these two worthies. What ought to concern us is that economic policy is being conducted by two men with experience in currency manipulation, and both huge fans of Central Bank Digital Currency, which Carney himself boasted about organizing at 2019 WEF meeting. By its own admission, the Bank of Canada has had such a plan prepared for some time.

       As for the United States? Recall that one of the New Right's first acts was setting up a Digital Currency program headed by Musk/Thiel crony David O. Sacks. This same Executive Order prohibited the Federal Reserve Board from interfering in nominally 'private' Digital Currency impositions. This, in turn, was followed by Musk and his DOGE goons (with Bessent's complicity) gutting any oversight of Big Banks or financial policy. In July 2025, our rump Congress passed the laughably-named GENIUS Act, to help facilitate any future transition to Digital Currency.

       Many pundits have been claiming that the New Right's economic policies could lead to a 'crash;' more likely, what we're looking at is a Controlled Demolition with Digital Currency (and internment camps, militarized political police, and a Surveillance State for potential objectors) waiting in the wings for both the US and Canada.

       In other words, the US-Canada spat is all for public consumption. The economies and Deep States are inextricably linked. Just as in domestic policy, the Democrats and some splinter groups are Controlled Opposition to deflect attention from the Globalist's internal agendas; so in the international sphere Canada is posturing as a 'moderate' power balancing the Accelerationist tendencies of the American New Right. The end game however is the Great Reset no matter which side 'wins.' 

      

          

THE EPSTEIN 'SCANDAL' AND CULTURAL ROT

        Anybody who's been following events here in the Prozac Nation probably saw that figurehead US Attorney-General Pam Bondi finally was called to testify before Congress yesterday. What do we suppose that our fearless public servants in Congress and our highly dedicated professional journalists focused upon? Was it to answer for the obvious bungling of another high-profile crime? Or was it to answer for ongoing cover-ups of ICE brutality? Or maybe it was to answer concerns about NSPM-7 and the potential for over-reach involved in classifying Politically Correct thought-crimes as acts of Domestic Terrorism? Maybe it was even to answer questions about seizures of voter rolls and records? 

        Well, no; it was none of those things. Ms. Pamela was called before Congress for the one thing that Americans consider more important than entrusting unaccountable police power into the hands of fools and incompetents. No: the whole proceeding focused upon online controversies surrounding muh Epstein Files. 

         This isn't just an American phenomenon either. Over in Old Blighty, the last Epstein release was enough to trigger an emergency session of Parliament: something that British support for Zionist Genocide or Keir Starmer's aggressive pushes for Digital ID systems and encroachments on Internet freedom couldn't accomplish. Members of the untouchable so-called House of Lords have been forced to resign and there's a furious debate that Prince Andrew sullied the sterling reputation of the British Crown which the descendants of George III have weathered from the perversions of Queen Victoria's Court to the suspicious death of Princess Diana.  

        North of the Border, too, the official cover-up of yet another Rainbow Warrior being involved in a mass-shooting this week has faded into the background because Epstein visited the country in 2014 and Canadian politicians have shown up on the 'list.' 

       I'm certain that Australia and New Zealand aren't far behind the rest of the English-speaking world in these respects just judging from the mass-hysteria that's emerged there over previous allegations of sexual impropriety. 

      The obvious conclusion that we can draw from these events is that the English-speaking world has a radically defective moral compass. The problem, however, goes much deeper than that. The English-speaking Western Nations are deeply repressive sexual cultures. Their fawning idolization of the Rainbow Pride movement doesn't counter that argument: it confirms it. Homosexuality and related perversions become prominent in a cultural milieu where natural sexual affections and interests are repressed. The mass-hysteria over the Epstein Files and its elevation to national crises stages is further proof of this. 

      The degeneration of sexuality didn't occur overnight; it's been part of an ongoing pressure campaign for the last few decades. Natural sexuality effects the individual on the deepest psychological level, and it's in the interests of totalitarian ideologues to undermine it as much as possible. This is one reason why homosexuals have such strong inclinations for supporting authoritarian regimes. 

          Americans, by and large, have bought into the anti-sexual zeitgeist, beginning with the Radical Feminism of the 1970s and reaching a full-on cultural crusade with Hilary Clinton's Gender Wars and the Controlled Opposition's Ritual Abuse panics of the 1990s. It's in the interests of the Ruling Elites to foment as much fear and division between the sexes as possible. This is the Strategy of Tension applied to the most individual and personal levels---and, of course, to the Elites the personal is political. 

       Some may ask: is what you're suggesting is that the current incarnation of the Epstein 'Scandal' is a psyop? That is exactly what I'm suggesting. Let's not forget who started this whole manufactured controversy in the first place:

         Like Epstein, Musk is a firm believer in both Transhumanism and Eugenics. Of course, those elements of Epstein's activities will be swept under the rug and the focus will be on lurid (hetero) sexual details that are alleged to have happened on Epstein Island. Musk and his Incel moles in DOGE---who got sweeping access to governmental records and now control wide swaths of Social Media can frame the controversy at will and, yes: they are doing so to advance their own agendas while distracting attention from issues which we should take seriously.

      

 

        

IT'S NOT A BUG, IT'S A FEATURE

         The last two weeks haven't been kind to the New World Order crowd now essentially Ruling by Decree (with the full complicity of the Democratic Party). In Foreign Policy, two now-former allies of the United States felt the wrath of the Alpha Supermen committed, they say, to making America Great Again.

      Colombia saw diplomatic channels severed and its President blacklisted after he complained about his citizens in the US being forcibly abducted, whisked off into Concentration Camps at home or to offshore Black-Budget sites. Likewise, the Colombian President felt that fishermen and recreational boaters being hunted and killed by Pete Hegseth for sport was an insult to his his country's sovereignty.

      Then, it was Canada's turn once again. In a thundering Truth Social post, President Trump (or whoever writes these things for him) blasted the Canadian Government for eliciting the words of Ronald Reagan (who really was a Conservative) and his opposition to punitive tariffs. Trump announced that he was cancelling unilaterally all Trade negotiations with Canada for daring to expose how far the New Right has drifted from Conservative principles. Actually, if we wanted to draw comparisons to 1980s politicians, the current Republican Party more closely resembles Lyndon LaRouche, Pat Robertson, or David Duke and other fringe characters. But the so-called 'Alternative Media,' which has no issue signing Government Loyalty Oaths, would rather such comparisons not be brought up.

     On the subject of historical parallels, though, many are starting to draw some rather unpleasant similitudes over the hysterical rages coming from the White House with increasing intensity and frequency.

      This negative image wasn't helped much by some recent scandals on the Domestic front either. Three times in the last ten days, the Woke Right has had to resort to intensive damage control after numerous operatives within both the Administration and the Republican Party at-large were caught involved in online Neo-Nazi activities. 

      The first blow came on October 14th, when Politico received nearly 3,000 leaked chats between 'Young Republicans' (i.e. TPUSA types), glorifying Hitler and condemning minorities as subhumans. The people involved included candidates for office, a sitting State Senator, and an operative in the Administration. Several of them have been removed from their positions, at least for now.

    The very next day, a Zoom call to Ohio Congressman Dave Taylor revealed some interesting office decor by Taylor's Media liaison.

           Taylor responded by claiming that the swastika was "an optical illusion," which is probably as sufficient an excuse as any for True Believers and Denialists.

           The third blow fell upon the White House nominee for Office of Special Counsel, Paul Ingrassia, who likewise was involved in the exchanged chats. Ingrassia has held two different positions within the administration, first at the Department of Justice under Pam Bondi, before he was reportedly forced out and moved to the Department of Homeland Security, where he has been serving as Trump’s White House liaison while waiting for a Senate confirmation hearing that was previously scheduled for Thursday. Ingrassia noted in the texts that “I do have a Nazi streak in me from time to time, I will admit it.”

         Ingrassia also remarked that crime among American Blacks occurred because “Blacks behave that way because that’s their natural state. You can’t change them.” It should be noted that this is far from the first time that Ingrassia has made such statements. Commenting on the 2024 CPAC gathering where GOP operatives vowed to overthrow Democracy, Ingrassia commented:  “We need competent white men in positions of leadership. ... The founding fathers were wrong that all men are created equal. … We need to reject that part of our heritage.” 

       None of this was unknown to the Administration. Ingrassia has been a frequent visitor to Mar-a-Lago and to fundraising dinners held by Trump. In fact, JD Vance rushed to Charlie Kirk's old podcast to defend all of these people as "just some kids making jokes," and complained that the pushback against them was "an attack on free speech," ironically at the same time that Marco Rubio was announcing a plan to revoke visas of immigrants who criticized Charlie Kirk. 

      This isn't, of course, the first time that Vance has covered for Neo-Nazis. He also defended the Neo-Nazi driven hoax against Haitian immigrants during the campaign; and certainly has had nothing to say about the open recruitment of Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists into State Security Forces like ICE. It must be recalled as well that Vance is deeply tied to Tech Oligarch Peter Thiel, who unabashedly lists actual Nazis as among his ideological influences. 

      In other words, these are not isolated incidents: to paraphrase a saying from Big Tech, Nazism is not a bug, it's a feature of the New Right. These are not Conservatives, but Reactionary Liberals, just as their spiritual forefathers in 20th Century Europe were. Rather than debate or disprove the Nazi canard thrown at them repeatedly by the New Left over the years, they have come to embrace it, as they have every negative stereotype ginned up by the Left.

      After the excesses of the Left, a Reaction was probably predictable---but that doesn't excuse nor justify it. A truly Conservative reaction would have been to institute reforms to keep these abuses from happening again. Instead, we see the so-called Right behaving exactly as we'd expect the Left to behave: motivated by hatred, paranoia, and other elements of the lowest level of human nature. 

     The question is: are we going to continue looking the other way, pretending there's no problem with extremism in our ranks, and rationalizing every new outrage? Or will Conservatives finally decide to say 'enough!' and take our movement back. 

          

     

WOKE RIGHT CHANNELS TIANANMEN TRUDEAU

        While we realize here that it's difficult for most Americans to remember what happened last week---let alone three or four years ago---several things that came out during the weekend News Cycle brought back memories. 

          Of course, even back then Americans couldn't be roused from their lethargy to support Freedom Fighters on our Northern Frontier---any more than they can be roused to challenge it when it happens here. 

          This weekend, the White House announced an initiative to crack down on those not showing sufficient grief for slain Christian Nationalist Charlie Kirk. Even though creating a Disinformation Governance Board was bad when the Democrats attempted it, the Woke Right has no issue with bringing it back under their control. The World Economic Forum made combating online disinformation (i.e. establishing censorship regimens) a top priority for their satrapies to implement in 2023 and 2024. The Democrats having failed, the New Right is giving it a try.

       Always on the Cutting Edge of implementing Police-State terror; Texas Governor Greg Abbott is proactively making sure that Free Speech has no place within his jurisdiction.

        Sure: but let's all just keep telling ourselves that the Republicans aren't part of a Globalist Uniparty and that they're really there to save us from Authoritarianism. Let's not forget either that they're still the most Free Speech Administration in History. 

                

RULE BY THE RED PILL

      Online 'influencers' of the Vox Day and Bronze Age Pervert sorts have long advocated the supposed necessity of Controlling the Narrative. What that term essentially means is to promote an official Party Line irrespective of its veracity or morality---the old name for this, of course, was propagandizing. The tactic is premised upon the idea that the majority of men are Blue-Pilled Beta Chumps, who have to be deceived for their own good by their Alpha betters. It's a concept that goes back into the New Right's much-admired Golden Age of Mediaeval Europe; although today, technology and dumbed-down schools and media have made its application much easier. In fact, all one really has to do is change a few labels and the media spin and bad ideas that the Left never got away with are embraced and accepted by so-called 'Conservatives.'

      Just yesterday, for example, the White House usurped the authority of a State Governor to deploy soldiers to suppress protesters in Los Angeles. The people were protesting against Federal stormtroopers who've recently been smashing down the doors of homes, schools, churches, and businesses to sweep up people engaged in activities like illegally washing dishes, mowing lawns, and stacking boxes. Only four years ago when the Democrats were doing the same thing under the pretext of a different National Emergency the American Right was outraged. But now that the right people are doing it, such actions are considered wholly justified and necessary. 

     DOGE is another example. Four years ago, when the Biden/Harris Junta was purging the Government under the pretext of rooting out extremism. That was bad; simply changing the ostensible objective to rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse and what are called purges when other countries do it gets a free pass over here.

    The examples could go on. Suppressing protests against our Government's support for a Regime whose stated goal is the extermination of 4 million people makes the Administration the most pro-Christian Government in history. Appointing dozens of Globalist billionaires to positions of power and eliminating any oversight of their activities is draining the Swamp. Weaponizing the Police State to go after political opponents is cleaning up corruption. Allowing States and Big Corporations to impose late-term abortion and homo 'equality' is promoting family-friendly values. Building massive surveillance networks, sealing borders and establishing internment camps at home and abroad is standing for Law and Order. The Executive Branch ruling by decree and intimidating judges and journalists is upholding the Constitution. It's no wonder that the Democrats have shown such little opposition: they're getting everything that they wanted and all they have to do is hand out Kleenexes at Town Hall Meetings to the poor saps who think that their side of the Uniparty actually cares.

    Regarding Los Angeles, Kaelan Dorr posted on behalf of President Trump that “If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can’t do their jobs, which everyone knows they can’t, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem… the way it should be solved!!!”  Neo-Nazi 'Border Czar' Tom Homan, who orchestrated the crackdown screeched on Murdoch's Media outlet that “We’re going to bring the National Guard in tonight. We’re going to continue doing our job. We’re going to push back on these people. American people, this is about enforcing the law.. And again, we’re not going to apologize for doing it. You’ve got your First Amendment rights, but if you cross that line of impediment, or you put hands on officers or destroy property, you will be prosecuted!” Selfie-Queen Kristi Noem---who nominally heads the Department of Homeland Security---paused posting on Instagram briefly to issue a statement too. It was all very reminiscent of the kinds of rhetoric we were hearing about a similar justification for turning the troops loose on protesters just three years ago. 

      Reflecting upon the Ottawa Massacre a year later, we noted here that the same psychological factors and the same tendencies were beginning to appear among supporters of the American Right. In 2023, we noted the results of several polls which concluded that "approximately 57% of Democrats, 63% of Independents, and a whopping 90% of Republicans agree with the statement 'The only way our country can solve its current problems is by supporting tough leaders who will crack down on those who undermine American values.' Four supplementary polls reveal that over half of these respondents actually mean favoring Authoritarian Dictatorship and not merely a decisive leader... The researchers noted that 'Anti-democratic statements are embraced by members of both U.S. parties, but more commonly by Republicans...Perhaps even more notably, nearly half of citizens who strongly support the Republican Party and over a third of those who strongly support the Democratic Party endorse the view that it is acceptable to 'bend the rules' for people like themselves to achieve political goals."

      From such actions as we have seen in Los Angeles and the vile rhetoric and even more disgusting policies coming from the New Right this decade, it is clear that the problem is much more deeply rooted than the relatively superficial issues over Immigration and Congressional Budgets. The results of the 2023 Poll have been borne out, and it has become clear that power for its own sake is what is driving American Political ideology. As an example, one of the leading Red-Pill influencers over the last week called for a sitting Republican US Senator to have his passport seized and be jailed for taking a position on Ukraine contrary to the Administration's; as well as demanding that SpaceX be seized and Elon Musk deported for criticizing the Administration. Both Senator Graham and Elon Musk have supported the Administration the vast majority of the time, but even deviating over Foreign Policy or a Budget Bill draws this kind of reaction.

         We on the Right have got to get ourselves out of this State of Denial and stop pretending that we don't have a serious problem on 'our side' with an amoral authoritarian element. Palliating the truth with rationalizations does not change the fact that we are closer today to a Totalitarian Regime than we were four years ago, and that's saying a lot. What is happening today to immigrants, pro-Palestinian demonstrators, and dissidents in general could happen to any one of us tomorrow.

      

     

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

      An interesting article appeared this weekend in the Murdoch-owned New York Post. The USDA, HHS, and DOGE apparently are working with members of the Uniparty in Congress to put restrictions on recipients of Food Stamps (EBT/SNAP). 

    “President Trump has been given a mandate by the majority of Americans to Make America Healthy Again, and those in his administration, like RFK Jr. and Senator Marco Rubio, have directly advocated for eliminating junk food purchases with SNAP,” Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-OK), who is leading 'The Healthy SNAP Act,' told Fox News Digital.

    On the surface, this idea has some merit; although it's difficult to reconcile what amounts to top-down Social Engineering with Conservatism. It's also a bit unsettling that, with the USDA on the hook to Bill Gates and DOGE under the thumb of Klaus Schwab, such people are going to be deciding what is acceptable food and what isn't.

    The real problem with choices made under the Food Stamp Program is that price-gouging by Big Ag makes healthier food choices unaffordable. Contrary to what many 'Conservatives' seem to imagine, Food Stamps aren't a blank check that recipients use to eat better than non-recipients. According to the article itself, the average SNAP recipient receives $211.93 per month. That's seven dollars a day that they have to spend on food. Considering that a pound of ground beef and a gallon of milk are often over that amount, and whole-grain bread and eggs are fairly close to that, bad food choices are simply being made because it's cheaper. 

    Not only does the public suffer from Big Ag's price-gouging, the proposed tariffs on net agricultural exporters like Canada, Mexico, and China are going to create both more scarcity of prime agricultural products as well as higher prices. In other words, so far from 'protecting public health' this is simply another wealth-transfer scheme. Of course, too, WEF people---who currently dominate the Republican Party---will offer their healthier alternatives and if we don't see the poor outright required to purchase such products, they will be forced to by sheer economic necessity.

      If these fake Conservatives were really concerned about what they claim, they would enforce and enact laws on producers ensuring better standards. They would enforce anti-trust laws against Agricultural Combines and ensure that independent farmers had some level of competition. Instead, though, we've had regulatory agencies gutted of any oversight and Wall Street billionaires and WEF Oligarchs put in charge of policy. The WEF Agenda is fairly clear; by 2030, Americans will have just as much to eat as the Oligarchy thinks necessary to squeeze the maximum production out of them at minimal cost to the Elites. This is to be expected from a political movement which holds up Mediaeval Europe as the ideal society.

    The way to reduce dependence on SNAP and encourage healthier eating choices is to ensure that healthier foods are affordable. The Republicans are doing a replay here of Obamacare---which instead of making healthcare affordable and accessible enriched and empowered the same Plutocrats who want to do for our food supply what they've done for healthcare. Affordability would actually empower consumers, but that isn't what the Uniparty wants. 

    Of course, there's no explaining any of this to the True Believers. When the WEF reaches its goals in 2030 and it takes a six-figure yearly income to buy meat, milk, and bread, you can bet we'll be reading articles on how based and Red Pilled eating the ersatz alternatives really are, or how we should lift ourselves by our bootstraps and how starvation and malnutrition are lifestyle choices. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Robber Barons will go on rioting in the spoils and laughing in their sleeves at the simpletons who empower them. 

     

     

GOP OPERATIVES MEET WITH FOREIGN FIFTH COLUMNISTS

      The Financial Oligarchy which seized power in the United States in 2020 is moving along to speed up the Great Reset. Phase 1, under the Democrats and their figurehead, Biden, prepared the groundwork with downsizing unprofitable foreign assets like Afghanistan and solidifying their holdings among other foreign colonies in the Middle East, Europe, and East Asia. In 2025 we are seeing the Expansionist Phase, which will garner more resources and transfer more wealth into the hands of the Ruling Elite; both domestically and in Foreign Policy.

     To the latter end, the Globalists in the Incoming Government are fomenting Color Revolutions in Europe under the same pretexts they did here: ginning up stories about violent immigrants raping White women and, of course, hyping the 'China/Russia Threat.' Elon Musk has been funding various traitors and malcontents in EU countries using the same blueprint that his predecessors Bush, Soros, Obama, etc. used to overthrow foreign governments and install those more amenable to the goals of their confederates in the WEF.

    Before even taking office, Team Woke at Mar-a-Lago have turned their larcenous eyes Northward, apparently making the Arctic their first goal of conquest. Trump Jr and Christian Nationalist Charlie Kirk travelled to Greenland this week to meet with Fifth Columnists to negotiate the surrender of the island to the New Order.

      The traitor in the video is named Tim Zeeb. Unlike the American Media, the Danish Press actually probed into Zeeb's background a bit, and discovered that he has a lengthy criminal record including a four-year stint in prison for smuggling narcotics; was once the subject of nationwide manhunt after breaking out of jail; and several violent-crime convictions. 

     Oops! Well, given the kinds of people that the New Right embraces as role models and the types of characters they choose as community role models, it shouldn't be surprising that Zeeb would be among the based and Red-Pilled. 

     In Canada, the move for Anschluss is being spearheaded by 'influencer' Kevin O'Leary; another Globalist lowlife, who has been meeting with fellow-Tech Lord Musk at Mar-a-Lago to negotiate the surrender of Canada to the US Corporate Deep State. O'Leary infamously bragged about using AI software to freeze out undesirables on the Deep State's behalf. O'Leary shamelessly refers to himself as 'Mr.Wonderful,' is supporter (for now) of Canadian Controlled Opposition Leader and WEF operative, Pierre Poilievre. 

      One would think that Canada and Denmark---even given their rather lax approaches to criminal behavior---would have some kinds of laws against citizens meeting with foreign governments to negotiate the surrender of sovereign territory. After the Second World War, such laws were enforced fairly rigorously; it might be time to dust off a few of them and bring Zeeb and O'Leary to justice Nuremberg style. As for Musk, the EU is already considering proscribing him as an undesirable alien: something that Americans ought to consider doing as well. 

   On a more positive note, the blustering of America's Ruling Class may be the wake-up call that Canada and Western Europe desperately needed to alert them of the true ends of the Great Reset. It doesn't include them after all. In fact, these annexation schemes are simply a revival of Bush's plan to create the North American Union after the Republicans reneged on their campaign promises to repeal NAFTA in the 1990s. In 2005, Bush Jr. met with Canadian and Mexican leaders to issue the following:

“We, the elected leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States, have met in Texas to announce the establishment of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

“We will establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working parties will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses, and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals. They will outline concrete steps that our governments can take to meet these goals, and set dates that will ensure the continuous achievement of results.

“Within 90 days, ministers will present their initial report after which, the working parties will submit six-monthly reports. Because the Partnership will be an ongoing process of cooperation, new items will be added to the work agenda by mutual agreement as circumstances warrant.“

    The plan of a North American Union has been the dream of Techno-Fascists going back several years, though current schemes seem to include the British Isles. 

     I don't really know what to say here: the transhumanists, globalists, and Techno-Feudalists' hold over the Republican Establishment hasn't been any great secret, and their objectives were fairly well advertised, including Elon Musk's proclamation of the New Order dressed in the black-and-gold colors of the Dark MAGA (i.e. Red Pill Cult) movement. The presence of Neocon Bush-Machine holdovers---fully committed to Bush Sr.'s New World Order ideology--- in the 2024 Campaign was no great secret either. But Americans chose to ignore those things, as they always do, and latch on to anybody who looks powerful and to whom they can outsource their thinking. 

    

CONSERVATISM AT HOME AND ABROAD

      While the American Media was focused on candidates driving around in garbage trucks, the foreign press reported that Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico arrived in China for a state visit. Fico had planned to visit China this Summer, but was shot by a Soros-backed pro-Ukraine fanatic and has only recently recuperated. 

      "The Prime Minister rejected claims that his trip threatens Slovakia's economy. According to him, if anyone threatens the economy of the Slovak Republic, it is the green deal approved by the EU. Next year, according to him, it will experience difficult economic times due to its decisions, according to news portal European Newsroom." 

     Fico's visit highlights the stark (albeit some depressing) distinction between the European Conservative Movement and what passes for one in North America. The Slovak Prime Minister is interested in boosting his country's economy through multilateral trade: not provocative arms-sales or hegemonic containment. "Slovakia was one of the countries to vote against the EU imposing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. Fico's visit brings the rational voice on China within the EU." A Chinese analyst noted. "Since coming to power, Slovakia's new government has firmly opposed the concept of a 'new Iron Curtain' and trade protectionism, advocating for abandoning value-based diplomacy, and promoting broad, mutually beneficial cooperation with non-Western countries, including China. The concepts of equality, mutual benefit, and win-win cooperation advocated by China have resonated within Europe without being divided by ideology, which has allowed China and Slovakia to establish mutual trust on a deeper level."

     American Conservatives used to be in favor of free and fair trade too; but money from Wall Street Oligarchs seem to make our side a bit more flexible on economic issues. It's interesting to compare today's Republicans to European politicians like Marine LePen, who campaigned on declaring the WEF a foreign government and requiring corporate members of that organization to register as foreign agents. Or Vladimir Putin and Alexander Lukashenko who expelled foreign-based NGOs from their countries and focused on building a domestic infrastructure. In contrast, Republicans promise to put WEF Young Global Leaders in positions of power and turn more of our resources over to Wall Street.

     We see these differences in so many areas. Conservatives in European Parliaments are moving to ban the Abortion Industry and suppress homo 'equality' movements while our Republicans vow to veto abortion bans and host gala fundraisers for the Rainbow Mafia. European Conservatives condemn the tyranny of the Zionist Supremacists in Palestine and the Ukro-Nazi thugs in Kiev while ours egg these butchers on to even greater crimes. The European Right is standing up to Globalist climate and medical pseudoscience while our Right embraces them. The European Right fights for infrastructure, including functional schools and a strong labor force, while ours supports Corporate takeovers of such institutions. 

    To sum it up the American Right looks more like the European Left than it does anything remotely resembling 'Conservatism.' This goes for the so-called Canadian Right too; which is just a mirror-image of our fake Conservatives here. In fact, the Republicans are really no more than the Reactionary Left; there isn't a single President from Lincoln to Reagan whose policies resemble anything close to what the 2024 Conservative-Industrial Complex advocates. 

    Despite the fact that several top Republican leaders and donors openly refer to themselves as Neo-Reactionaries, a large swath of the Electorate has convinced itself that the camarilla of WEF/Bush Machine operatives, homo activists, and techno-fascists surrounding the near-octogenarian figurehead representing the Republican Party poses no threat to our Republic. It's really like those on the Left who think that the Great Reset is just some conspiracy theory despite its proponents publicly stating their intentions.

   Likewise, I don't know how much more clear the Republicans have to be about what they intend to do. The Republican candidate for Governor in North Carolina is an admitted Neo-Nazi; the Senate candidates in Ohio and Pennsylvania have deep ties to the WEF; the Senate candidates in Montana and Michigan have deep ties to the Military-Industrial Complex; the candidate in Arizona is a pro-abortion feminist; and the incumbents in Texas, Florida, and Nebraska are arch-RINOs who've rubber-stamped all or most of Biden's military spending and domestic espionage programs. At least three WEF Young Global Leaders have been promised positions in a Trump Cabinet and two others are henchmen of WEF strongmen Peter Thiel (Vance) and Bill Gates (Burgum). That is what is what they claim is going to save us from the Globalist Left.

   We need to take a good look at Conservatism across the Atlantic, because they are standing for what Conservatives here need to be doing. If we had a Robert Fico running for President, Kamala and her crew wouldn't have a chance. However, there is no chance for positive change so long as rank-and-file Republicans persist in willful ignorance of what today's Republican Party really is. We need to start cleaning up our own house before we start talking about cleaning up the country. 

    

    

TIME TO THROW THE 'KILL SWITCH' ON THE SURVEILLANCE STATE

      As we go into the weekend, nearly 2,000 of our fellow-Americans are in jail for criticizing US Foreign Policy. It all brings back memories of 2020 when Americans were being jailed for criticizing the Scamdemic Hoax. Now, as then, so-called 'Conservatives' are leading the charge, while our servile public and press stands silent. Meanwhile the Vulture of Critique's site has given us a comprehensive summary of all of the new DEI violations that our Woke GOP Congress has given future college campuses. In fact, we've actually managed to exceed Canadian levels of Free Speech repression. In Canada, only Christians are singled out for so-called hate speech, our Congress includes Orthodox Jews who criticize Zionism and the Moslems---whom our compassionate Liberals cared about so much yesterday will be walking on eggshells along with the rest of us tomorrow.

    The RNC is quite delighted at the campus crackdowns---just like when the genocide in Palestine broke out, the Republicans see a great campaign marketing opportunity; a chance to own those Libtards and to portray Biden as a weak-willed weenie while positioning themselves as leaders. In our Postmodern Corporatist Dystopia recall that 'image' is the only thing that matters: merit and ability, not so much.

    To underscore this point, one Kevin O'Leary, a Canadian media figure who considers himself a financial guru, boasted that he and his Corporate Deep State cronies are now employing AI to screen out and blacklist potential job applicants who don't show sufficient loyalty to the WEF's position on Zionism. I guess this is a new angle when marketing oneself these days: a willingness to look the other way while institutions exterminate entire populations and lock up its critics is considered a desirable characteristic in a potential employee. 

   O'Leary---who is also a leader in Canada's Conservative Party---warned that “It’s happening right now as we speak. I’m just one firm doing this. When we dig deep into the dark web for your background, I’ll see you. We don’t even consider that person. Why would we when we have lots of other people that aren’t burning stuff? If your passion for a cause is more important than your future career, go for it.I’m not saying you shouldn’t do that. I think you should think about your future. Think about your career. Think about your personal brand. Think about all the opportunities you’ll never know that you missed. You’ll never know why you didn’t get that loan, or that mortgage, or that job, or get that board seat.”

       That is Postmodern Conservatism all over! Why tarnish the illusion of Democracy with a dictatorship, when we can outsource it all to the Free Market? If you think that a cause, say, opposing Regimes that murder children in cold blood, well, go for it! Just don't think that it won't tarnish your personal brand {nota bene} which will, in turn, make you a social pariah. Your duty is to the Collective; personal feelings are passe these days; in fact, having them can be dangerous. 

      The Canadian Deep State isn't the only foreign entity warning Americans that their reach of Surveillance is infinite. The Zionist Secret Police are also sending us friendly reminders that the Corporate Nanny State is watching:

      Israeli spyware companies are major contractors to both the US and Canadian Governments: and while we were all worrying about things like Chinese spy cranes, weather-balloons that blow off course, and Tik-Tok, our Uniparty secured a huge expansion of Domestic Espionage capabilities. Government officials did exempt themselves from such snooping, but the rest of us are now at the mercy of the Corporate Deep State which, as Kevin O'Leary and the Mossad notes, can result in one being frozen out of society. 

    It is a mistake to assume, as many do, that the extermination of the Palestinians or jailing American protesters is the ultimate goal in all of this. To the Oligarchy, all human life is expendable. They don't care about the dead or incarcerated: the objective here is to strike terror into the hearts of the living and free. A Regime which is capable of mass-murder and mass-arrests is capable of anything. These reminders that they are watching are in reality veiled threats. Add into all of this the Oligarchy's capriciousness about what is acceptable and their ability to change the Official Narrative on a whim, is what is keeping the population in constant fear of being behind the Power Curve. A few human sacrifices here and there reinforce that fear. 

   Our system of Inverted Totalitarianism is a cruel refinement over the old-fashioned dictatorships. In a Fascist, Communist, or Monarchical Regime one always knew where they stood vis-a-vis the Ruling Class. In our system, one never knows. With the informal networks of Social Media enforcing conduct and opinion we've even evolved a system of Ex Post Facto laws where what is not 'acceptable' today can be leveraged against something someone said or did decades ago. Technology and the Marketing Mentality has created an atmosphere where we all live essentially in an electronic Hall of Mirrors forcing people into continual self-examination and mass conformity. That explains in a large measure this paradoxical cultural aspect of contemporary American life that is simultaneously Narcissistic and yet submissive to authority. 

   Those familiar with concepts like the Cycle of Abuse in domestic relationships recognize the pattern being played out on a larger scale. Bessel van der Kolk, a Dutch psychoanalyst wrote during the 1980s that "People in general, and children in particular, seek increased attachment in the face of external danger. Pain, fear, fatigue, and loss of loved ones and protectors all evoke efforts to attract increased care and most cultures have rituals designed to provide it. When there is no access to ordinary sources of comfort, people may turn toward their tormentors. Adults as well as children may develop strong emotional ties with people who intermittently harass, beat, and threaten them. Hostages have put up bail for their captors, expressed a wish to marry them, or had sexual relations with them; abused children often cling to their parents and resist being removed from the home; inmates of Nazi prison camps sometimes imitated their captors." 

   That is the effect that abusers produce in their victims, through an alternating series of inflicting pain and fear alongside providing 'security' and offering protection. Van der Kolk also demonstrated what Freud had discovered about the Compulsion to repeat the trauma---or as pop culture expresses it, 'triggering': "The ambivalence and confusion when protective figures are simultaneously a source of terror leads to hyper-arousal states for which the memory can be state-dependent or dissociated, and this memory only returns fully during renewed terror. This interferes with good judgment about these relationships." 

   The Deep State is not invincible, and what characters like Kevin O'Leary most fear themselves isn't so much public knowledge about what they are doing as it is learning how they are doing it. Knowledge is power in such cases. Again, drawing the parallel to abusive relationships, the victim usually finds freedom when they realize that they are not random victims of an unpredictable fate, but of a systemic, organized plan. The Elites know that communities deciding not to participate in their schemes spell their downfall; hence the urgency in high places to suppress dissent and target foreign governments which stand up to them as National Security Threats. Like all abusers and bullies, their whole system is built upon a bluff: maintaining the illusion of power. They display and parade around their trillions of dollars, but the equation that they really want to keep out sight is that this Elite Top 10% is heavily outnumbered by the remaining 90%. 

    

   

NET ZERO, THE DIGITAL PANOPTICON, AND THE FUTURE OF FOOD

      It's always refreshing to find an article online where an author ignores the official narratives and approved counter-narratives of the Uniparty and focuses upon issues that actually are occurring behind the Media smokescreens. It was written by Colin Todhunter whom, in the interests of full disclosure, I know little about; and is titled, Net Zero, The Digital Panopticon, and the Future of Food. The author gives us a good summary of the progress towards the Great Reset---which, despite discreetly being ignored by both Republicans and Democrats---is still ongoing and being put into operation. 

    The World Economic Forum, is the de facto Government of the so-called 'Democratic West.' The Great Reset, their grand plan for tyranny, was unveiled in 2020. The WEF and the Great Reset in general are scoffed at and hooted down by the experts in the Western Media despite having published their intentions clearly and their positions being adopted by nearly every Western Government. The WEF's Board of Trustees is comprised of some of the world's most powerful central economic institutions, political leadership, and major corporations. The WEF's Strategic Partners---now expanded to 120 members---includes the West's most powerful Corporations, banks, and NGOs. The organization is based in Switzerland, the home of various cut-outs and networks of international intrigue. 

  "The food transition, the energy transition, net-zero ideology, programmable central bank digital currencies, the censorship of free speech and clampdowns on protest. What’s it all about? To understand these processes, we need to first locate what is essentially a social and economic reset within the context of a collapsing financial system." Todhunter begins, and goes on to explain the ongoing economic contraction in the West as part of an overall concentration of power.  

   The standard talking-point from American Conservatives---who, like the Marxists they oppose, are economic determinists---is that nebulous market forces lead invariably to an 'economic correction.' The problem with their thinking is that their theories were formulated before the Industrial Revolution when it literally was impossible to create monopolies and concentrations of wealth without centralized government authority. When technology made mass-production possible, it became possible for private entities to control entire economic sectors in much the same way that, in our Founding Fathers era, were only possible with Royal Charters and other special grants from kings. 

   This situation changed in the Western countries about a century ago with initiatives to bring the power of popular governments to regulate economies and ensure that free-market competition could continue. These policies fell into disfavor in the late 20th Century, and we see the results of abandoning them all around us today. As Todhunter notes, the average profit-margin of businesses has fallen from 43% in 1970 to about 17% today. We could add to this that, in 1970, the United States produced over half of the world's GDP whereas in 2024. it is around 15%. 

   Deregulation brought with it Regulatory Capture, turning over the duties of elected governments to unaccountable private contractors, and massive concentrations of economic power in the hands of fewer and fewer entities. The doctrinaire Laissez-Faire theories promulgated by postmodern Conservatives naturally leads them to conclude that we are headed for an 'economic crash.' Nothing could be further from the truth. What we are witnessing economically is something more akin to a controlled demolition. What the Robber Barons---who already hold most of the national wealth---aim to achieve is a switch to Central Bank Digital Currency which they, of course, will control. 

   CBDC is already being introduced by Tienanmen Trudeau in Canada with ties to a 'social credit score.' Trudeau's Vice-Premier, incidentally, is on the WEF Board of Trustees. Despite Corporate Media guffaws about CBDC being a tin-foil hat Conspiracy Theories one of their own mouthpieces recently reported that the SWIFT banking system---which has a virtual monopoly on currency transactions between banks both in the US and abroad---is about to launch such a program (after the US Elections, of course). The overall plan originated in the shady WEF-affiliated Bank of International Settlements during the Scamdemic a few months after the Great Reset was announced. In October 2020, BIS' CEO Agustin Carstens stated:

   "We intend to establish the equivalence with cash and there is a huge difference there, for example in cash we don't know who is using a $100 bill today...the key difference with CBDC is that the Central Bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use regarding that expression of Central Bank liability (note: meaning what $100 can and can't purchase) and also have the technology to enforce that." 

   In 2022, Bo Li, an official at the International Monetary Fund whose CEO is on the WEF Board of Trustees stated: "CBDC can allow government agencies and private sector players {nota bene} to program, to create smart policy contracts to allow targeted policy functions {nota bene}...By programming CBDC these programs can be precisely targeted for what kind of people can own and for what these monies can be utilized." {nota bene}

  Christine Lagarde, CEO of the European Central Bank and WEF Board of Trustees Member said last year: “[...] you know the digital euro is going to have a limited amount of control. There will be control, you're right, you're completely right. We are considering whether for very small amounts, you know, anything that is around 300, 400 Euros, we could have a mechanism where there is zero control. But that could be dangerous, the terrorist attacks on France, uh back, uh 10 years ago, were entirely financed by those very small anonymous credit cards that you can recharge in total anonymity.”

   This week, financial octopus BlackRock whose CEO is also a WEF Board of Trustees member, announced a digital platform for its money-market accounts. So it goes; and lest anyone believes that a Red Wave in November will stop all of this, be advised that the Republican Party is wholly on board with it all. 

   Todhunter goes on to explain how climate hysteria (on the Left) and National Security paranoia (on the Right) are being utilized to drive this agenda. Once the Global Oligarchs have control of the currency to this degree, they will control both production and consumption and our Constitutional Rights will be more of a dead letter than they already are. This is why it is important for us today to build strong networks of our own because we'll need Parallel Economies in the future. The idea must be gaining some traction because the Whacko Left has noticed such things arising, but our freedoms will depend largely on how much we can disconnect from the System itself.