THE CLANCY TRIAL AND TRASH CULTURE WRIT LARGE

        So, in the last week the United States continues its descent into accelerated cultural decline. With Trade Wars and shooting-wars breaking out all over the place; the Police/Surveillance State ramping up to full speed; atomic war being discussed seriously; and the wealth-transfers continue flying up the chimney to the Globalist Elites---American Social and Entertainment Media is focusing on one of the things that unite the American Public's attention: sensational trials with political overtones. 

      Even though our Constitution (which was written by Dead White Males whom everyone ignores these days) guarantees "the Right to a Speedy and Public Trial," a murder that took place in 2023 is finally being tried. The sluggishness of our so-called 'Justice System' should be a topic of discussion in and of itself; but our Founding Fathers lived in a day and age before Trial-by-Mass-Media, and a heavily corrupted and commercially-driven Legal System. 

     We're speaking of course of the Lindsay Clancy Case, which we wrote about the time that it happened: it was a cause celebre among the Whacko Left and everyone else who could cash in either politically or economically. Forgetting about the three children who were murdered, the Left brought out the Victim Cards for the mother/murderer. We also did a follow-up on the father involved, who also played Victim Card and has come out with a tidy profit of his own. He's since remarried and both he and Lindsay Clancy have pending lawsuits against the State. During the three years which have passed, everybody involved is cashing in even more: lawyers, media, the families, politicians, Big Pharma: but that's not where the controversy lies.

      In a Culture where Abortion is considered a fundamental Human Right, homos are allowed to adopt children, public schools are hellscapes and Genocide is considered legitimate Foreign Policy it's not surprising that the murdered children would be the last thing on Americans' minds. No: instead, this case has become a political football, with one side using it to support or attack Big Pharma; and another using it to support or attack Radical Feminism. 

        There's something radically wrong with a Society when the first reaction to the murder of three children is "how do we capitalize on this?" We excoriate our Leaders for never letting a good crisis go to waste, but the Clancy Case is an example of the kind of moral societal compass in today's America that brings such creatures to positions of power. Our System is failing because those leading it---both the Political Class and the Oligarchy who owns them---are actually representatives of a failed Culture. The Elites, of course, make it worse by encouraging social division and degeneration. Our Culture, in turn, becomes a negative feedback loop: those who are most repelled by cultural corruption are those most capable of fighting it; but the interests of the corrupt Elites prevents such people from assuming any position of effecting meaningful change.

         

         

REPLY TO BISHOP STRICKLAND

      So, while most normal Americans were observing St. Valentine's Day by honoring someone special in their lives, our very based and Red-Pilled White House was reminding us all not to forget that the New World Order is on the job.

     Ah, that's some very classy stuff. I almost suspected for a moment that Vox Day had gotten a position in the White House PR Department. It wouldn't be surprising since Vox, along with Andrew Tate, Mencius Moldbug, Bronze Age Pervert, Andrew Tate, and Steve Sailer are among the most admired thinkers in the New Right's constellation of intellectuals. 

    One person, however, that the New Right wholeheartedly despises is Pope Francis. The fact that our leaders admire Red-Pill bloggers but hate the Pope speaks volumes about their character in and of itself; but that hasn't caused many Catholics and Christians to stop and think about what they might be supporting.

   Francis has caused an infuriated backlash by having the temerity to suggest that treating groups of people as subhumans and behaving like bullies and thugs wasn't consistent with Christ's teachings. The Pope outlined his views in a letter to the US Catholic Bishops.

   While most of the Bishopric took the Pope's words to heart, a few dissented. Bishop Joseph Strickland, former Vicar of the Diocese of Tyler, Texas, penned a rebuttal of sorts which was published at LifeSite News which, since January 20th, seems to have turned into a 24/7 Praise-a-Thon for the Neocon Wing of the Uniparty. Strickland himself was removed from office by Pope Francis in 2023: for some inexplicable reason doing things like calling the Pope "a diabolically disoriented clown" and suggesting that Francis is an Antipope in the service of Satan caused the Vatican Hierarchy to think that Strickland might not be as committed to the Mission of the Church as he should be.

  Strickland's article only lightly touched on the issues raised in Pope Francis' letter; for the most part the article was attacking the Pope for not speaking out against Biden's policies. Actually, Francis did criticize Biden's policies occasionally---especially Biden's exacerbation of foreign wars---but this wasn't enough to suit Strickland who disingenuously argues that the Pope wasn't intervening enough on the right causes. Granted, the Pope has taken some positions that deserve criticism, but none of these were in the substance of Francis' letter to the Bishops.

   When Strickland does get around to mentioning immigration, he says: "the Catholic Church recognizes the legitimacy of sovereign nations enforcing just immigration laws. While the Church calls for humane treatment of migrants, it does not demand open borders or the abolition of deportation policies."

   The obvious objection here is that Francis acknowledged that Nations had a right to enforce immigration laws and never advocated for Open Borders or the abolition of deportation policies. 

   "One must recognize the right of a nation to defend itself and keep communities safe from those who have committed violent or serious crimes while in the country or prior to arrival," Francis wrote, "This does not impede the development of a policy that regulates orderly and legal migration. However, this development cannot come about through the privilege of some and the sacrifice of others. What is built on the basis of force, and not on the truth about the equal dignity of every human being, begins badly and will end badly."

   The whole idea of 'Open Borders' is a hoax created in Neocon and Neo-Nazi echo-chambers, which evidently Strickland has bought into. He likewise has no criticism anywhere in his article of the inhumane treatment of immigrants, which was the substance of Francis' appeal. For a cleric who complains so fervently about Francis' supposed silence on social issues, Strickland doesn't seem overly bothered by the New Right's continual references to immigrants as subhumans; nor do I recall him ever lifting a word in protest over his own state's brutality in dealing with immigration.

   "There has long been a concern about the Church’s financial ties — particularly with globalist organizations — as well as concern about government funding and wealthy donors who have a vested interest in certain political outcomes." Strickland asserts, "Especially in the case of immigration, there is a large financial element at play. The Catholic Church in the United States receives significant government funding to assist migrants and refugees through Catholic Charities and other organizations. Stronger immigration enforcement means less funding for these programs which is undoubtedly a large factor in the Vatican’s stance." 

   While the Vatican admittedly has been too cozy with Globalist interests, Strickland is being a bit disingenuous in suggesting here that the Republican Wing of the Uniparty is not. That aside, however, Strickland is repeating another canard circulated widely by the Controlled Opposition: namely, that the Church's sole reason for providing relief to immigrants and refugees is from purely cynical and mercenary motives. If this were so, the Church wouldn't be seeking alternative sources of support for their work in the face of persecution, nor would they be engaged in charitable activities abroad in impoverished counties. 

   Strickland concludes by stating that "Pope Francis’ reluctance to address grave moral issues raises legitimate concerns about whether financial and political interests outweigh doctrinal fidelity on the part of the Vatican," which sounds more like psychological projection than anything else. 

   Let us face facts here: the very things that Strickland accuses Pope Francis of 'ignoring' are the very things that the Neocons whom Strickland supports have done. He chides Francis for not speaking out against abortion (Francis has, in fact, spoken out about it), but hasn't a word of condemnation for Trump's commitment to veto an abortion ban nor his tolerance of States performing late-term abortions, nor his shamelessly taking donations from pro-abortion groups. He snorts that Francis has looked the other way and tolerated homo 'marriage' (another hoax, Francis has supported traditional marriage as legitimate); but doesn't seem troubled that Trump hosted such farcical 'weddings' in his own home, raised funds from homo activist groups, or appointed more of these types to high office than Biden did. 

   Of course, it's an exercise in futility to try explaining any of this to these Good German types of Catholics whose willingness to sacrifice their fellow-believers to save their own skins is a disgrace to everything Christianity stands for. Like their kindred-spirits in 1930s Europe, they want to pretend that a national movement predicated on ruthlessness, aggression, and brutality is going to let them live in peace if they just bow and scrape hard enough. Such a policy doesn't work with neurotics and fanatics as they may well learn to their sorrow. 

CATHOLICS AND THE CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST TRAP

       It is commonly believed that the scourge of Christian Nationalism is confined to certain cultish Megachurches which nominally are Protestant, and that the poisonous doctrines haven't infiltrated Catholicism to the same extent. After all, Pope Francis and several high-ranking officials in the Church have denounced the movement, and there is precedent for it as well. After the suppression of the Cathars in Mediaeval Europe---whose doctrines contemporary Christian Nationalists mirror in many ways---the Council of Florence convened under Pope Eugene IV ruled in 1441:

    "Whoever, after the passion, places his hope in the legal prescriptions of the Law of Moses and submits himself to them as necessary for salvation and as if faith in Christ without them could not save, sins mortally. It does not deny that from Christ's passion until the promulgation of the gospel they could have been retained, provided they were in no way believed to be necessary for salvation. But it asserts that after the promulgation of the gospel they cannot be observed without loss of eternal salvation."

    Christian Nationalism has strong ties to the Zionist Cult; both believe themselves people chosen by God (i.e., a Master Race) to impose their interpretations of the Old Testament via the Force of Law upon their 'inferiors.' Many Catholics seem to be under the delusion that the Christian Nationalists include them in their chiliastic and nihilistic fantasies as well, despite all of the evidence to the contrary. In fact, the Worldwide Web during the last two weeks have been filled with some of most appalling and degrading degrees of fawning apologies for, as well as revolting displays of utter servility to, the Uniparty; even when the very leadership of the Church---whom we presume are better versed on Christian Ethics than Deep State technocrats---say otherwise.

    The Department of Homeland Security---an institution which really has no justification for existing under our form of Government, is currently headed by a rabid Christian Nationalist, former South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem. Governor Noem recently staged a photo-op in New York City of herself posing as the Aryan Valkyrie leading the White Knights into battle against the foreign-born who are corrupting our Blood and Soil. 

       It doesn't seemed to have dawned on these very based and Red Pilled Catholics that around 100% of the immigrant roundups and forced deportations are targeting people from predominantly Catholic countries; or that Governor Noem singled out Catholic Services for the proposed funding freeze. Only few years ago, when the Democrats were attempting to defund Catholic organizations over their refusal to implement pro-abortion and pro-homo policies, that was an assault on religious liberty and overt discrimination against Catholics. But when Republicans do it, in the service of the same Uniparty though re-packaged and re-sold under a different agenda, the Catholic laity decides to sit on their hands and do as they're ordered.

     Some of the apologists for the New Order emphasize the few crumbs that the Republicans have tossed us on Social Issues, and blown the significance of these things wholly out of proportion. These actions aren't being done because the Administration cares so deeply about issues important to Catholics; they are doing them because they happen to dovetail with issues pressed by the Christian Nationalists. On top of that, they are mostly hollow gestures: publicity stunts that won't actually effect much of anything. Terminating Federal support for things like Abortion Mills and homo 'equality' doesn't mean making these things illegal: the Reactionaries are simply outsourcing Woke Ideology to State Governors and Wall Street Corporate Oligarchs.

     Why are so many Catholics falling into the Christian Nationalist trap? Like many other Americans, they value the security of an authoritarian government more than things like religious liberty; and---also like many Americans---live in a State of Denial that Government Overreach will ever be employed against them. Many Catholics in 1930s Germany made the same rationalizations and it didn't work out so well. 

    It's not going to work out this time either. The Reactionaries have a history going back several years outlining their plans to usher in their version of the Great Reset; and their contempt for Catholicism has been noted for just as long. At best, they consider all religion a useful tool to keep the masses in subjection---an ideal not far removed from the typical Megachurch leadership, but considerably far from the traditions of the Catholic Church. Denial and refusal to stand on principle has never worked, and never will.

       

MUSK GETS CAUGHT FUNDING PRO-ABORTION PAC

       As post-Election FEC statements are coming out, it has been revealed that WEF Young Global Leader Elon Musk essentially purchased the United States Government for over a quarter-billion dollars. None of the True Believers, of course, ever questioned whether these enormous sums of money that Musk---a government contractor---was spending constituted a Conflict of Interest, nor did they question Musk's long history of spending on Democrat candidates to get those contracts along with special favors, or his cozy relations with the Deep State, or his ongoing promotion of WEF causes and people. Everyone was too busy owning those Libtards on X to pay any attention to Musk's activities. Now, Musk has been given enormous degrees of power in the Incoming Government to push his woke globalist agenda.

     Life Site News is reporting this morning that among the pro-Republican PACs Musk founded and funded in 2024 was the pro-Abortion Ruth Bader Ginsberg PAC. For those who went to public schools or can't remember news from over five years ago, we should explain that Ruth Bader Ginsberg was one of the worst Left-Wing Whackos to sit upon the US Supreme Court. She was appointed by the Clinton Co-Presidency and only three Republican Senators voted against her confirmation. 

   That same Neocon spirit that came from our kinder, gentler version of the New Right in the 1990s no doubt influenced Musk's choice of names, even though the Ginsberg Family, who are rather hard-core Liberals, are furious that Musk used her name without their permission and for a cause that supported Trump. However in a Party that long ago abandoned any moral high ground and boasts that Facts Don't Care About Your Feelings, it's unlikely that Musk's actions will be seen as anything other than a shrewd policy tactic. These days, success is all that counts.

   The RBG PAC ran ads late in 2024 praising the Republican Party's newly-woke position on Abortion and drawing parallels between Trump and whacko Ginsberg. Sadly, I have to admit, the parallels are fairly close these days. 

      The True Believers deny, of course, that the Republican Party has shifted radically to the Left and are quite content with the increasingly authoritarian direction that Musk and his globalist billionaire confederates are taking national policy. The Globalist Oligarchy is happy with it too. This week alone, Team Woke had productive meetings with Mark Zuckerberg and Tienanmen Trudeau at Mar-a-Lago. Musk and his policies were also the topic of a roundtable discussion conducted by the wholly-disinterested New York Times. In case anyone's interested, it cost a minimum of $2,500 to get a seat in the audience and journalists not employed by the Times were barred from entry.

   Jeff Bezos, one of the Globalist Oligarchs interviewed, gushed that "Trump has grown...I’m very hopeful—he seems to have a lot of energy around reducing regulation. And my point of view is, if I can help him do that, I’m going to help him, because we do have too much regulation in this country.” Sam Altman, the founder of OpenAI and a flaming homo activist who himself founded a PAC for Joe Biden, slobbered that under Musk's leadership the Technocratic Fascism that he and Bezos work hard to achieve will become reality. "An artificial general intelligence, which can completely replicate the functions of a human mind, are not far off." Other attendees, which included various technocrat CEOs, members of the British Royal Family, and former President Clinton, expressed their optimism about the evolution of the Republican Party.

   However, as we have been informed repeatedly by the pundits on the New Right, anyone who opposes a unelected Corporate Bureaucracy substituted for a popularly-elected government are envious losers and no doubt closeted Marxists: the fact that the New Right has its origins in Marxist Philosophy to the contrary notwithstanding. 

   Whatever wing of the Uniparty that the Globalists employ to complete their objectives, we must state here that we firmly hold that the Great Reset ultimately will fail. However, we are in for some hard times between now and then, but we must still commit to resisting it in whatever form it takes.

     

CONSERVATISM AT HOME AND ABROAD

      While the American Media was focused on candidates driving around in garbage trucks, the foreign press reported that Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico arrived in China for a state visit. Fico had planned to visit China this Summer, but was shot by a Soros-backed pro-Ukraine fanatic and has only recently recuperated. 

      "The Prime Minister rejected claims that his trip threatens Slovakia's economy. According to him, if anyone threatens the economy of the Slovak Republic, it is the green deal approved by the EU. Next year, according to him, it will experience difficult economic times due to its decisions, according to news portal European Newsroom." 

     Fico's visit highlights the stark (albeit some depressing) distinction between the European Conservative Movement and what passes for one in North America. The Slovak Prime Minister is interested in boosting his country's economy through multilateral trade: not provocative arms-sales or hegemonic containment. "Slovakia was one of the countries to vote against the EU imposing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. Fico's visit brings the rational voice on China within the EU." A Chinese analyst noted. "Since coming to power, Slovakia's new government has firmly opposed the concept of a 'new Iron Curtain' and trade protectionism, advocating for abandoning value-based diplomacy, and promoting broad, mutually beneficial cooperation with non-Western countries, including China. The concepts of equality, mutual benefit, and win-win cooperation advocated by China have resonated within Europe without being divided by ideology, which has allowed China and Slovakia to establish mutual trust on a deeper level."

     American Conservatives used to be in favor of free and fair trade too; but money from Wall Street Oligarchs seem to make our side a bit more flexible on economic issues. It's interesting to compare today's Republicans to European politicians like Marine LePen, who campaigned on declaring the WEF a foreign government and requiring corporate members of that organization to register as foreign agents. Or Vladimir Putin and Alexander Lukashenko who expelled foreign-based NGOs from their countries and focused on building a domestic infrastructure. In contrast, Republicans promise to put WEF Young Global Leaders in positions of power and turn more of our resources over to Wall Street.

     We see these differences in so many areas. Conservatives in European Parliaments are moving to ban the Abortion Industry and suppress homo 'equality' movements while our Republicans vow to veto abortion bans and host gala fundraisers for the Rainbow Mafia. European Conservatives condemn the tyranny of the Zionist Supremacists in Palestine and the Ukro-Nazi thugs in Kiev while ours egg these butchers on to even greater crimes. The European Right is standing up to Globalist climate and medical pseudoscience while our Right embraces them. The European Right fights for infrastructure, including functional schools and a strong labor force, while ours supports Corporate takeovers of such institutions. 

    To sum it up the American Right looks more like the European Left than it does anything remotely resembling 'Conservatism.' This goes for the so-called Canadian Right too; which is just a mirror-image of our fake Conservatives here. In fact, the Republicans are really no more than the Reactionary Left; there isn't a single President from Lincoln to Reagan whose policies resemble anything close to what the 2024 Conservative-Industrial Complex advocates. 

    Despite the fact that several top Republican leaders and donors openly refer to themselves as Neo-Reactionaries, a large swath of the Electorate has convinced itself that the camarilla of WEF/Bush Machine operatives, homo activists, and techno-fascists surrounding the near-octogenarian figurehead representing the Republican Party poses no threat to our Republic. It's really like those on the Left who think that the Great Reset is just some conspiracy theory despite its proponents publicly stating their intentions.

   Likewise, I don't know how much more clear the Republicans have to be about what they intend to do. The Republican candidate for Governor in North Carolina is an admitted Neo-Nazi; the Senate candidates in Ohio and Pennsylvania have deep ties to the WEF; the Senate candidates in Montana and Michigan have deep ties to the Military-Industrial Complex; the candidate in Arizona is a pro-abortion feminist; and the incumbents in Texas, Florida, and Nebraska are arch-RINOs who've rubber-stamped all or most of Biden's military spending and domestic espionage programs. At least three WEF Young Global Leaders have been promised positions in a Trump Cabinet and two others are henchmen of WEF strongmen Peter Thiel (Vance) and Bill Gates (Burgum). That is what is what they claim is going to save us from the Globalist Left.

   We need to take a good look at Conservatism across the Atlantic, because they are standing for what Conservatives here need to be doing. If we had a Robert Fico running for President, Kamala and her crew wouldn't have a chance. However, there is no chance for positive change so long as rank-and-file Republicans persist in willful ignorance of what today's Republican Party really is. We need to start cleaning up our own house before we start talking about cleaning up the country. 

    

    

SOME FURTHER DINNER CONTROVERSIES

      Shortly before President Trump's photo-op at a Pennsylvania McDonald's drive-in, the President attended a posh dinner at the New York Hilton Midtown Hotel hosted by the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation. The event is an annual one, named in honor of Franklin Roosevelt's predecessor both as Governor of New York and Democrat Presidential nominee. The Foundation is currently headed by Smith's great-grandson, a former Wall Street stockbroker who retired from Bear-Stearns with a Golden Parachute shortly before the Bush/Obama bailouts when the firm sold to WEF Strategic Partner, JP Morgan. It cost $5,000 just to get a ticket to get into this year's event while prime seats at the event tagged $250,000.  

    The Foundation supports many Catholic causes, and another manufactured controversy has been surrounding this year's dinner. Kamala Harris did not attend, although President Trump did: and, in a day and age where the personal is political, the Controlled Opposition Press has made another soap-opera out of Kamala's absence. Catholic League President Bill Donahue went on the Murdoch Family-owned news outlet, Fox News, to opine that: "Harris’ snub of the Al Smith dinner sent an unmistakable message to Catholics” and that her absence was "just the latest in a career full of swipes at the faithful."

   Donahue's remarks fairly well echo much of what the paid punditocracy working in Republican interests have been saying. While there's much truth in what Donahue says about Kamala and the Democrats, I think it a much greater snub to Catholics to have thrown the decades of work involved in repealing Roe vs. Wade under the bus; as well as giving unequivocal support to the Jewish Supremacists ethnically-cleansing Christians in the Middle East, but we digress.

      Trump had RINO House Speaker Mike Johnson and Deep State operative Mike Pompeo in tow; while the emcee, Hollywood hack Jim Gaffigan, told jokes about an upcoming Civil War. Trump laughed off the remarks, boasting that "he had been coming to the dinner for decades with his father, and that his first check to a politician was to Senator Schumer" accompanied by a friendly pat on the back. Trump also praised New York Democrat Governor Kathy Hochul, who just promoted one of the nation's most radical abortion laws, saying: “Good job. It’s not an easy one, is it? But you are doing all right,” as well as expressing sympathy over NYC Mayor Eric Adams' legal problems: “Good luck with everything, they went after you. They went after you, mayor...what you're facing is peanuts compared to my legal woes. But I think you're gonna win and you're going to be OK."

     Among other attendees were WEF members Michael Bloomberg and Stephen Schwarzmann (one supports Kamala, the other Trump); woke NFL Commissar Roger Goodell, a couple other NFL team-owners, and billionaire Ken Langone. The event was sponsored by WEF Strategic Partners and financial octopuses Bank of America, Goldman-Sachs, and Deloitte. Trump acknowledged his debt to the Corporate Overlords promising in his concluding remarks: “I will work with the governor, I will work with the mayor, with Democrats. I will work with them, whoever I have to, and we will even work very hard to bring back the S.A.L.T. tax deduction. We are going to bring it back,” which elicited a round of cheers from the Oligarchs and their Uniparty operatives. 

     Unsurprisingly, the Controlled Opposition Media paid little attention to any of this; instead of jeering Kamala for skipping the event they should be asking what the Republican Leadership was doing there. But asking those kinds of questions wouldn't suit the purposes of the Conservative-Industrial Complex, which has to keep up the narrative that they are working in the interests of mainstream working-class Americans. These days, unfortunately, controlling the narrative is all that really matters and wishful thinking takes a back-seat to Reality.

THE UNIPARTY AND ANOTHER FAKE DEBATE

     While the rest of humanity was watching events in the Middle East---a major power finally stepping up to curb Zionist aggression---we in Exceptional America were focused on yet another Big Debate, this time between two Deep State shills vying for the Vice-Presidency.  Mercifully, Tuesday night's event probably will be the last theatrics before November when we conclude what has to have been the most ridiculous farce of an Election yet.

    We weren't expecting too much here to begin with; just the usual gutter-level finger-pointing followed by both sides' paid media analysts claiming victory on one side and biased moderation on the other. The expansion of the war in the Middle East obliged the CBS production team to pretend as though it was an issue that they cared about and lead off with questions on the subject. Not surprisingly, both Vance and Walz slavishly bowed to the Pro-Israel Lobby with the CBS fact-checkers nodding approvingly. 

   Beyond the Middle East, the rest of Tuesday Night Raw noticeably avoided topics that might shake Americans' complacent equilibrium: topics like runaway inflation, deteriorating national health, living standards, and workplace safety; our corrupt educational system, corporate interference in elections, growing censorship, the expansion of the Surveillance State, etc. 

     The two candidates basically agreed on the 'Abortion Issue;' which for the perverts running Big Media and the Abortion Mills run by Big Pharma is a national priority. The Democrat position is that infanticide is a Natural Right which ought to be enshrined in the Constitution, while the Republican position is that infanticide is fine as long as the Federal Government doesn't mandate it---which amounts to the same thing, although both wings of the Uniparty apparently believe otherwise.

    The next clickbait issue that CBS brought up was gun-violence in schools; which the Media ownership has turned into a small-scale version of the Scamdemic. Vance jumped on this opportunity to advocate turning the public school system into bigger prison camps than they already are, saying: "We have to increase security in our schools! We have to make the doors lock better! We have to make the doors stronger! We’ve got to make the windows stronger! And of course, we’ve got to increase the school resource officers!”

    Walz actually called out Vance on this point, although nobody thought it prudent to mention that during the Scamdemic Walz wasn't the least bit squeamish about employing brutal police repression against anybody (except for BLM rioters when it was expedient to do so). Given the Scamdemic-level of police repression that the Republicans are proposing to deal with immigration, the moderators decided to let both issues float. 

    The CBS crew did float over to the topic of immigration, however, mostly because Vance had made a spectacle of the issue in September. During the 'debate,' Vance doubled-down on the Immigrant Invasion myth and turned his ire upon one of the moderators for bringing it up. As an interesting side-note, to lend even more of a Reality TV atmosphere to the whole proceeding, viewers apparently had some kind of app that they could scan when they wanted an interjection from the so-called Fact-Checkers. 

     Overall, there wasn't too much else worthy of comment. As to who 'won;' clearly Walz' Hollywood script-writers and Madison Avenue promotion teams did make him look like less of a Nazi than Vance. Vance's repeated appeals to blood and soil, peace though strength, open disdain for qualified opinions, exuberance for the police state, and obvious offense at having his positions questioned didn't help much in projecting a salable image---which is what these clown-shows are all about in the first place. 

    That truly is the sad reality of the situation. In Europe and Asia, people are pushing back against the Globalists and their New World Order while here we try to pretend an ex-Hollwood/Silicon Valley trial lawyer and the former head of various shady NGOs suspected of being CIA fronts are really going to do anything in the interests of the American people or Civilization in general. 

   

CHINA'S NEW ADOPTION POLICY SHAMES AMERICAN FAKE CONSERVATIVES

      Following the lead of a growing number of countries, the Chinese Foreign Ministry announced today a permanent ban on foreign adoption agencies. The Communist Party of China announced the move after considerable public pressure on their domestic social media sites, highlighting the especially horrible conditions that children are exposed to in the US; including testimonies from a number of expats who'd had personal experience with America's toxic child-rearing environment. The total ban had been proposed for some time: in 2007, China put severe restrictions on adoptive couples, vetting them especially "with an increased scrutiny of families’ lifestyles as well as imposing age limits and restricting adoptions to heterosexual married couples," according to the South China Morning Post. Thus, the previous Chinese law was already better than the standards that most US States have in place. 

    The anti-China hawks in the Corporate Media are foaming with outrage; hypocritically pretending that they really care about families and that the Chinese Government's move is some great act of Commie-Pinko tyranny. What's likely angered the Uniparty a lot more is that they are well on the way to commodifying human trafficking, which promised to be a future growth industry just like the Abortion Racket. The loss of China represents no doubt a major import source of human capital just as the overseas market for aborted fetal tissue and organs brings high prices. 

    If Americans still had any capacity for feeling shame, it would be a national disgrace that the Chinese Communists care more about the welfare of children than we do. It's not at all a positive reflection upon us that the general consensus seems to be that a child growing up in a Chinese orphanage has better future prospects than one growing up in an American home. We might look askance at China's top-down and often heavy-handed approaches to their youth; but there's no use papering-over or excusing the fact that, however awkwardly, they are succeeding in preparing a new generation while our culture is failing. That's the whole point. It's not that Communism is the ideal system: it's that we're not giving anymore any reason for anybody to think otherwise. 

    It didn't used to be this way. Certainly there were abuses and waste in our more libertarian system, but it generally worked. Families were considered the pillar of the community, hence the involvement of local communities in investing in the youth was important. The Dead White Males who were community leaders back then had an entirely different philosophical approach to what we have today. Children were not the 'property' of the State; nor were they the 'property' of the parents: the general consensus was that children were a gift from God and raising and nurturing them was a sacred trust. 

   Somewhere along the line, though, Americans lost that sense of a sacred trust and children became just another commodity on the national balance-sheet. Parenting is calculated on a cost/benefit analysis by most Americans; and as far as the general community is concerned, children only are valuable insofar as they represent a profit to government and corporate bureaucracies---otherwise they are expendable. Only a culture in an advanced state of degeneracy could look at the levels of violence, suicide, addiction, illiteracy, poor mental and physical health of its youth and shrug it off as the new normal.

   The worst thing about it all is that the 'Conservatives' and the 'Christians' in America are the ones doing most of the shrugging. When they aren't, like the self-righteous Pharisee, thanking God that they are not like other men they're cynically looking at these problems as potential opportunities to pad their own pockets while lecturing the human debris left over from their policies to lift themselves up by their bootstraps. 

   The problem isn't with China, it is with us. China is only acting in self-preservation: an instinct which we Americans seem to have lost. If we hope to salvage what we can out of our future, we must recover the social will to do so. Certainly we can't rely on top-down solutions because neither faction of the Uniparty has any particular desire to implement any. Whether or not Americans have enough character left in them to do it though, is another question. 

   

     

WOKE REPUBLICANS TOUT ABORTION AND AI IMPLANTS

       This weekend presidential candidate Robert Kennedy suspended his campaign and rather naively decided to endorse the Republican Establishment. The collection of Dark Enlightenment Transhumanists and Bush-Machine billionaires hoping to capture the Government with the (probably temporary) figurehead Trump no doubt were laughing in their sleeves as Kennedy accused the Democrats of being “the party of war, censorship, corruption, big pharma, big tech, big money,” as if the people he was endorsing were not. A strain of quixotic idealism seems to run in the Kennedy Family. 

      The very day of Kennedy's announcement, WEF Young Global Leader Elon Musk---who has been promised a top position in a Trump Administration---boasted on his media echo-chamber that he looked forward to implanting millions of people with AI brain chips. Did anybody stop to notice that giving Musk a position in the Federal Government might enable him to bring this idea to reality? Apparently not. The Controlled Opposition Media was occupied with more urgent news releases.

       Obtaining an AI brain implant is a voluntary procedure (for now); and Musk and other proponents claim that it will only have medicinal or technological applications. There is, of course, no talk about the potential dangers of such a technology, at least the European Union and China are taking some initiative to curb potential abuses, but we in Exceptional America prefer to act first and think later. The problem here though is that thinking later will have an algorithm programmed by Big Tech to reach our conclusions for us; and too we don't want to interfere with the free market and compromise stakeholder profit-margins.

     It's not a huge Leap of Logic to envision the 'necessity' of getting an implanted chip palmed off on the public as a national security issue. In fact, we might recall that such a plan has already been floated, and Bill Gates---who has a henchman in the Vance/Trump Campaign already lined up for a cabinet post---is already experimenting with a similar program in one of his African puppet-states.

    Musk's experiments with human subjects actually was rejected by the FDA in 2022; but in America, money talks and it was approved the following year. Ethics and safety matter little where Big Pharma and Big Tech are involved---just ask the people who took the safe and effective Loyalty Vaxx. 

      While we're on the subject of safe, legal procedures, Republican Presidential nominee Vice-Presidential candidate J.D. Vance sat down with the Corporate Media to assure Ameroboobs that his Trump's Administration would veto any attempts to impose a nationwide abortion ban. Not that the chances of a McConnell/Johnson Congress proposing such a policy is all that realistic anyway; but again, it comes down to a cost/benefit argument. 

     "Donald Trump wants to end this culture war on this particular topic." Vance incredulously argued, "If California wants to have a different abortion policy than Ohio, then California has to respect Ohio, and Ohio has to respect California.”

     Or to put it more accurately: Just because Roe vs. Wade was overturned doesn't mean that we Christian Conservatives have to sacrifice stakeholder profits from fetal tissue trafficking and the abortion mills. We've already seen that, among the Republican leadership, social issues have become a marketable commodity.

    Vance, too, is backed by WEF Young Global Leader and Techno-Fascist Peter Thiel and is himself deeply imbued with Dark Enlightenment ideology. WEF Young Global Leaders Musk, Thiel, Tulsi Gabbard, and Vivek Ramaswamy are all going to have a lot more say in a Trump Administration than Kennedy will. It stands to reason that if Kennedy's anti-Deep State stance had any chance of success, he wouldn't be suspending his campaign. 

    None of this will matter to the True Believers, though. They think that Waheguru saved Trump from an assassin's bullet and that this is part of a Divine Plan according to the Prosperity Gospel; that holding our noses and voting for Neocons magically will bring back American jobs and values; that every boy will grow up to be like Andrew Tate and all of those evil brown and yellow people abroad will learn to fear America and walk softly before our leaders' Alpha Superiority. Conservative principles? How quaint: good for speeches and Sunday Schools, but this is the real world. The real world according to our Plutocratic overlords, that is. 

    

POSTMODERN CONSERVATISM: THE FANTASY AND THE REALITY

       This weekend, according to the Controlled Opposition Media, Conservatism Incorporated has the 2024 'election' all sewn up. Polls are only showing a slight lead so far for the GOP and the Party has done nothing to combat the voter fraud that put the Democrats in power; but trust the plan, people are waking up! Some have seen the potential of this: many pundits are claiming that the Biden/Harris Junta are 'flooding the country' with illegal immigrants to shore up their vote totals---how the Junta still managed to steal the last election with Trump's immigration restrictions in place, they haven't explained. In Postmodern Newspeak, facts don't care about your feelings; which is even more so when the Party Bosses decide what the facts are. 

     Those of us remaining on the Right who insist upon pointing out that the 2024 GOP's official narrative conflicts with Reality, are dismissed as Commie-Pinkos. I don't mean to sound defeatist, but it is a fact, as opposed to your feelings, that when one's optimism is based on an illusion, that isn't optimism, it's fantasy. The Republican Convention was such a spectacle of political putrefaction packaged and sold to the lowest and most degenerated intellectual, political and moral levels that some of us have wondered whether all of those Disney and Bud Light executives who were forced out of their positions haven't gone to work for the RNC.  Amber Rose, a reality TV star who authored a book titled How to Be a Bad Bitch performed there; and on the last night of the convention, Trump’s keynote speech was preceded by Kid Rock performing his song American Bad Ass, while pro-wrestler Hulk Hogan screamed and tore off his shirt. The final speaker introducing Trump was Ultimate Fighting Championship promoter Dana White, who invented the power slap competition in which individuals sit opposite one another and attempt to slap one another’s faces as hard as possible. The President-in-Exile entered the stage while pop star Lee Greenwood belted out God Bless the USA and Trump thanked God for sparing his life---although the first night of the Convention, we learned that the god that everybody had in mind was an obscure South Asian deity whose disciples ritually smoke marijuana. The Log Cabin Republicans---who openly boast that their goal is to get a 50% gay turnout for Trump apparently don't find Jahve inclusive enough these days in spite of His having created the Rainbow.

       However, despite all of this we are to believe that the Republican Party is truly committed to bringing back traditional values and valiantly opposing Trash Culture---despite having shelved any vestige of actual Conservatism from their Party Platform. Such political speakers available during the pop-culture fest included Arizona Senate candidate Kari Lake, who not only fought to overturn her State's abortion ban, she openly criticized the Democrat Governor for not being aggressive enough supporting the Right to Choose. North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum---whose largest campaign donor is Bill Gates---gave a nauseatingly hypocritical speech trashing Biden's energy policy when only a few years ago he was praised by the Biden 'Administration' for his commitment to so-called Green Energy goals. Then there was VP pick J.D. Vance who only two years ago said on Manosphere cretin Jack Murphy's podcast that he had recently taken the Red Pill and that nobody should pay attention to his past as a Silicon Valley/Hollywood lobbyist and corporate lawyer. 

     We're also to believe that these woke billionaires from Big Pharma, Big Ag, and High Finance flooding the campaign with cash really too have seen the light and that they have renounced the globalist Great Reset agenda---even though at least four convention speakers (that I've identified so far) are WEF Young Global Leaders. 

    Now, we have to ask: does it sound like the narrative about the Republican Party standing for the average American is Reality, or does it sound like fantasy?

      At this point, it must be mentioned that many well-meaning Americans---probably including Trump himself---have reached such a point of desperation that they're completely blind to the sea of red flags surrounding this 'campaign.' As a specimen of this, one of the stupidest articles yet crossed the desk this morning celebrating that the 'Old Guard' Republicans, represented by the likes of Ronald Reagan, Pat Buchanan, and William F. Buckley are giving way to the 'New Breed.' The dunces who wrote this seriously argue that the Conservatives of the mid-20th Century impeded socially Conservative causes and bowed to Neoliberal economics! It's telling that they didn't mention the Bush Administrations or anyone connected with them, which shows where "the Republican Party of the Future," is really going. 

    The more cynical of the Republican hierarchy might argue that we have to be realistic; that the intended audience for this kind of message actually is on such a low moral and intellectual plane and so willing to submit to an Alpha Leader that it might as well be the Republican faction in power. There is some truth to this, unfortunately; however if what they say is true then it would in theory be just as realistic an approach to offer programs and policies appealing to people's better natures as it is to appeal to their worst. That alone shows the falsity and true intentions of the so-called 'Realists.' Their 'realistic' approach is only a rationalization for serving Vested Interests while posing as smart operators. 

   The reality is that, as things stand right now, no matter what happens in this 'election' nothing of any consequence will change, and the same Plutocrats behind the Great Reset will continue amassing more wealth and more power. What is incumbent upon us is seeing through the illusions and doing what we can to defeat the Uniparty.

    

    

 

WOKE REPUBLICANS ADVANCE LEGALIZING CHILD-TRAFFICKING

      It ought to be no secret to anybody by now that the Republican Party is nothing but Controlled Opposition and really has been for years. This is despite a massive marketing campaign to energize the True Believers into believing that the tried-and-true tactic of holding our noses and voting for Neocons magically will somehow 'save the country.' The fact that since 2020, the charade has become transparent to a growing number of people doesn't sway them even though the Republican Party has become, for all intents and purposes, the Democrats with arguably better PR and management techniques. 

    The Republican Party in the State of Massachusetts, for example, is applying the Free Market approach to parenting with a new proposal which would legalize child-trafficking. 

    "Under H. 4672, the following would be perfectly legal: a woman undergoes the physical and mental health screenings required to become a surrogate, becomes pregnant via sperm from a sperm bank, and then posts to a surrogacy forum or social media group that she is not only available as a surrogate but already pregnant. She could then choose to match with the couple willing to pay the highest payment of consideration, essentially auctioning off her child. As long as the surrogacy agreement meets the requirements outlined in the bill, it could be validated by a court and viewed as not only permissible but legally binding."

   It should be noted that our good allies in the Pro-Israel Lobby feature prominently among organizations supporting this Bill. This is fighting for our Judeo-Christian Heritage, I suppose. Republican State Representative Hannah Kane, who co-sponsored the legislation affirmed that: “It is a principle that acknowledges the diverse tapestry of modern families and affirms their right to legal recognition and protection under the law.” Massachusetts, of course, recognizes homo 'marriage' and not only celebrates late-term infanticide abortion, to the point where even mothers who experience buyer's remorse and decide on a postpartum termination of childhood have legal protections. 

   The Woke Republican Party of today cares very little for the welfare of children. During the Scamdemic, they dropped their long-standing support of homeschooling in favor of re-opening the charnel-houses of public education despite knowing fully well what hellscapes these institutions are. Since then, they've launched various fake initiatives against DEI programs while replacing them with their own versions and pretending that they're reforming the system. This year, they gave up their pro-life positions as long as abortions only happen in Blue States; and, of course, their attitudes towards the murder of children in places like Gaza, and their callous treatment of immigrant children is well-documented. 

     Actually during the whole Election Cycle, we've asked---and never received much of an answer---exactly why the Republicans would be any improvement over the Democrats (assuming of course that voting actually matters). We all know that the Democrats are no good; but we've yet to see any hard evidence that the Republicans are any better. So far, they've really done very little except to say that they will enforce Democrat policies more efficiently; execute the Democrats' wars and immigration policies more ruthlessly; exchange reactionary Political Correctness for the more radical versions; and expand the power of Corporations in imposing the New World Order more decisively. Those things, and they also vow to engage in further Lawfare. 

    It should be unnecessary to have to explain this to Christian Conservatives in light of the Massachusetts Bill, but the selling of human beings is, by definition, slavery. Now while it is true that many heroes of the postmodern Right don't see an issue with slavery and cost-effectiveness and personal profit seems to be the only criterion of ethical action these days; historically Conservatives had a very negative view of such things. 

    Likewise, before there was a Prosperity Gospel which reduced human beings to the status of commodities, the Church taught that "The seventh commandment forbids acts or enterprises that for any reason - selfish or ideological, commercial, or totalitarian - lead to the enslavement of human beings, to their being bought, sold and exchanged like merchandise, in disregard for their personal dignity. It is a sin against the dignity of persons and their fundamental rights to reduce them by violence to their productive value or to a source of profit." Despite what the postmodern Right seems to believe, this would include innocent children, whom the Bible regards as something a little more valuable than chattel property.

   As more and more of this duplicity from the Fake Right is being exposed, a growing number of people are waking up to the reality that the Republican Party is no more a Conservative institution than America is really a Christian nation. The more who repudiate Neoconservatism the better our chances of restoring America becomes; but time is running out as we've seen in Massachusetts. Whether we can extricate ourselves from the Uniparty or not remains to be seen. 

   

    

   

    

     

ON PIGSKINS, SHEEPSKINS, AND A DYING CULTURE

      So this weekend, Social Media Trash Culture and the Churchian Right are engaged a major ratings and clickbait blowout because some sports figure who played in this year's Taylor Swift Bowl (or whatever they call the Super Bowl these days) made some remarks at a college commencement speech. Given the fact that most colleges and universities are basically scam operations selling degrees, expertise, and influence (at very high prices) and that our culture places little to no value on merit that supposedly comes with these commodities, one would think that we'd have higher priorities that what someone says at these fake displays---a relic of a once-great system that today only serves to create the illusion that education is really a national priority. 

    

     Harrison Butker, who made the speech, is himself a graduate of Georgia Tech, an institution heavily tied into Big Pharma. A product of the NCAA Money-Machine, another corrupt offshoot of the Academic Mafia which rakes in billions for these institutions. The athletes involved in this scam, like other graduates, typically go from four years of being celebrated and rewarded to being dumped on the streets to sink or swim once they're of no further use to the schools. Also like other graduates, only a small percentage ever go on to any kind of success in their chosen fields. 

    However, the American public would rather not think about any of that. Every year, these phony ceremonies have to have some kind of controversy or scandal around some speaker to divert attention away from seriously thinking about what a fraud and a cheat the whole system is to begin with. 

   Butker apparently said something to the effect that being a home-maker was a noble calling for women. In a culture where abortion is considered a sacred rite and murdering entire families is simply the cost of doing good business, such remarks were bound to be met with contempt. Between the Whacko Left Wing---which thinks that depopulation (i.e. genocide) is a worthy social goal and the Churchian Right---who value women and children slightly less than the the White Slave traffickers of 12th Century Turkey; one can well imagine what the tone of these online firestorms sound like. 

     Rather than descend into the gutter, let's talk about what being a homemaker actually involves. The Old Testament, with its often very succinct way of expressing profound truths describes the creation of Eve and by extension tells us about the Divine origins of complimenatrianism, which is considered on the level of obscenity in our postmodern dystopia though its practice was largely responsible for building civilization. The division of labor, where both genders worked together in the spheres for which they were best suited built societies. In fact, up until recently it was well-understood that genders become more specialized and differentiated as they advance. 

    Contrary to what Feminist revisionists and Churchian reactionaries teach, as families grew into communities, men produced and provided while women ran domestic affairs in the home. In Classical Times, women had the status of 'property' more because of their recognized value than because of any patriarchal oppression or silliness about the sins of Eve. This continued until our 'enlightened' generations believed that the Corporate State was more valuable than the family. Being a 'homemaker' had women in charge of maintaining everything relating to the household: even in large estates they managed the servants, the accounting, the logistics of supplying the goods and services for the household---it was not a drudgery or slavery as often portrayed by both its modern detractors and promoters. 

   In Ancient Rome, for example, one of the most obscure festivals was held every December exclusively for women. Little is known about this festival, since only women participated and they were sworn to secrecy. Even the name of the actual Goddess honored isn't known: she was simply referred to as the Good Goddess. Even the Caesar had to leave his own home while this event was going on and everyone from his wife to the servant-girls participated. Cicero told a story about how one of his old school-mates disguised himself as a woman to learn its secrets but was discovered and badly beaten by the celebrants. Apparently, the unenlightened Romans didn't realize that men could become women simply by identifying as one.

   With our advances in technology, women have the opportunity today to be both homemakers and to pursue interests outside of the home. The misogynists on the Left, however, don't want them in the home at all; while the misogynists on the Right don't want them out of the home for any reason. 

  While I agree with Butker's sentiments, the whole debate is really a distraction from how little our culture values women's traditional roles and how truly worthless we believe them to be. Consider that the skyrocketing rates of female infertility, gender dysphoria, suicide, and addiction among young women isn't even a topic worthy of discussion. Nor is there much concern about the fact that the US---in less than 20 years---has fallen to the bottom of developed countries in infant mortality rates or the numbers of women who have died in childbirth. 

   The reality is that our culture cares no more about women than it does for children; and this whole debate is only a smokescreen for people to pretend that they do. Access to unrestricted abortion, easy divorce laws, the social criminalization of all but homosexual sexuality, the practical forcing of women into male positions and so-called 'trans-women' into female ones---all of these are symptomatic of a deeply misogynist culture. We mouth platitudes about how we esteem women and motherhood while doing exactly the opposite. But like the Academic shows where Butker appeared; it's all about keeping up the illusion rather than facing the reality.