Saturday, January 28, 2023


      Josiah Lippincott, one of the rising stars among postmodern 'Conservatives' has graced us all with a rather unique perspective on the immigration crisis. Not that his article makes a lot of sense; but it is the first time I've noticed someone on the Right trying to own those Libtards by postulating that immigration is destroying the environment. We should suppose that Lippincott has some first-hand experience with such matters; he openly touts himself as formerly one of our brave xhes in uniform, so no doubt he's seen first-hand the environmental damage that American 'invaders' have done to other countries. That includes Okinawa where he was stationed.  


     It's always seemed rather paradoxical to my mind that the same people who are the most intent on keeping foreigners out of the United States are the same ones who have no problem with our Military-Industrial Complex battering down other countries' borders and imposing our will on them. It's also an interesting paradox that they endlessly crow about American Exceptionalism but want to exclude anyone who wants to come in peace and share in it.

    Be that as it may, Lippincott opines that: "Since the passage of the Hart-Cellar Act in 1965, which radically overhauled American immigration policy to favor third-world migrants, tens of millions of additional human beings legally and illegally entered the country... Without the Hart-Cellar Act, the United States would have had 72 million fewer people as of 2015. That would have been a much better America." So, in other words, nobody who's come here during the last nearly 65 years has contributed anything to society. Neither have their descendants; and this guy probably wonders why so few young people vote Republican.

    Wait for it though, it gets better: "Immigration radically transformed American society, yes, but it also radically altered the literal American landscape. Mass immigration fueled a population boom on the West Coast that the nation simply does not have the infrastructure or resources to handle." 

   There's an interesting combination of the Postmodern Conservative's vision of the ideal society: a younger population not even reproducing at replacement rates working harder to support an increasing aging population---and doing it with aging infrastructure besides. What's seems to have escaped this nitwit's attention is that since 1965, we've done very little about building infrastructure to accommodate a growing population---or for that matter, even preparing for emergency management. We actually did a lot of infrastructure building between the Civil War and the Vietnam Era. Some of us who are old enough to remember that when Civics was still taught in schools, we learned that building things like bridges and roads were one of Government's top responsibilities. Since then, of course, the focus has shifted to government providing security, and we've spent accordingly with budgets directed at building military, surveillance, security, prisons, propaganda...etc.

    I suppose that having grown up under the Postmodern Security State, Lippincott's mind really can't relate to a society based on actual freedom, using initiative to solve problems, and respect for fundamental human rights. This is one of the dangers of this 'New Breed' on the Right. Not only have they been poisoned with Red Pilled ideology, our generation's failure to teach them American values properly has left them with no frame of reference except to solve problems with force. It makes perfect sense to these types to spend resources on building Border Walls and vastly expanding police powers rather than trying to assimilate people into the American Way so that they can contribute. 

   It ought to be a wake-up call to many of us on the Right, to note that Lippincott is not some random online ignoramus running a Manosphere Alt-RINO blog: he's a PhD candidate from Hillsdale College who has clerked for Congressmen and written several articles in prominent publications---even being promoted as some kind of 'military expert' on Fox News even though he only served four years at a minor post in the Obama-Era woke military. Yet his whole article is one big toxic stew of  'overpopulation' pseudoscience. If it weren't for the very thinly-veiled White Nationalism, it reads like any of the nonsense promoted at the World Economic Forum.

    The American Society of Civil Engineers keeps a running report and a scorecard on American infrastructure. Here's how we score nationwide:

Roads: D. "Over 40% of the system is now in poor or mediocre condition. As the backlog of rehabilitation needs grows, motorists are forced to pay over $1,000 every year in wasted time and fuel."

Bridges: C. "Currently, 42% of all bridges are at least 50 years old, and 46,154, or 7.5% of the nation’s bridges, are considered structurally deficient, meaning they are in “poor” condition...At the current rate of investment, it will take until 2071 to make all of the repairs that are currently necessary, and the additional deterioration over the next 50 years will become overwhelming."

Dams: D. "Over the last 20 years, the number of high-hazard-potential dams has more than doubled." It should be noted that the US hasn't constructed a major dam since 1980.

Transit: D-. "45% of Americans have no access to transit. Meanwhile, much of the existing system is aging, and transit agencies often lack sufficient funds to keep their existing systems in good working order. Over a 10-year period across the country, 19% of transit vehicles, and 6% of fixed guideway elements like tracks and tunnels were rated in “poor” condition."

Water: C-.  "The system is aging and underfunded. There is a water main break every two minutes and an estimated 6 billion gallons of treated water lost each day in the U.S."

    As far as agriculture goes, the fact that Marijuana is our leading cash crop while eggs and butter are disappearing from store shelves speaks for itself.

   This is why Lippincott's solutions are disingenuous. Americans are not being replaced, they are self-destructing. We are reproducing below replacement rates; employers can't find people willing to work; drugs are rampant; half our families are broken; a plurality of young people are gender dysphoric and fertility-rates among the young are declining while stillbirths and infant mortality is climbing; our schools are complete failures. And people like Lippincott imagine that closing our borders and inbreeding with this kind of raw material is going to help. Take a close look at the BLM riots raging (again) this weekend. Do you see Africans, Haitians, or Jamaicans leading these rampages, or are they Americans born, raised, and educated here? Or Antifa: how many of their ranks are filled with immigrants? I don't see the foreign-born leading the charge for homo 'equality' or burning churches over "a woman's right to choose." 

    If anything, we need new people here---people seeking freedom, people willing to work and build families, people with new ideas and sense of community who haven't degenerated into what our culture has. If we closed our borders what could we build with anyway? We've reported the numbers here: 1/4 men under 30 still live with their parents and aren't even seeking marriage. 1/5 pregnancies end up in an abortion mill. 1/6 Americans between 18-30 identify as non-binary. 1/8 men aged 15-30 have insufficient testosterone to father children and 1/12 women in the same age group are clinically infertile. 

   People of Lippincott's stripe talk about a Great Replacement---which is really more of a reality in Europe than it is here---but the truth is that the multi-generational Americans are destroying themselves. The threat itself is also widely exaggerated. In Europe, the immigrants are primarily non-Christians from Middle Eastern and Central Asian despotisms; here they are mostly from other parts of the Americas or East Asian countries which have had extensive contact with Americans. These people are not coming here to build new colonies of China or Venezuela---they're mostly escaping failed/failing republics; most of which have (as hard as it is to imagine this) more governmental corruption, fewer personal liberties, and worse economies than we have.

   The idea that somehow, some based and Red-Pilled 'Manly Alpha Leader' is going to return us to the kind of America we had demographically in 1950 is an illusion. Lippincott's article is just another attempt at scapegoating immigrants for our own failures to uphold a free market, self-government, or even sustain ourselves as a society. 




Thursday, January 26, 2023


     When I first heard about this article, I thought it might be a satirical, clickbait story. Unfortunately, it seems that the writer really meant it. It's not very long, so I'll print it here in it's entirety:

   "As the world struggles to come to terms with the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, one question that continues to surface is why the unvaccinated didn't do more to warn us about the potential dangers of being injected.

   "While well intending citizens lined up, did the right thing, and received their COVID-19 vaccinations -- now seeming to do more harm than good -- their unvaccinated friends stood by and let them do it. Some of them said too little. Some said nothing at all. Even though they knew what we didn't. Our blood is now on their hands.

   "Those are strong words. But the unvaccinated had access to important information about the potential side effects of vaccines. They knew about the risks of severe allergic reactions, blood clots, and other serious health complications. They knew that vaccines did not immunize us. They knew it wasn't effective, and that they can cause more harm than good.

  "They knew all of that, but instead of warning us, the unvaccinated chose to remain silent. They chose to look the other way and not speak out about the potential dangers of vaccines. They let millions of good folks who did the right thing (at the time) fall to death and disease, and many antivaxxers even gloated online about how their coin flip had been the right bet. The more diabolical even urged folks they disagree with to "get boosted."

  "It has become all too clear. The silence of the unvaccinated was a dangerous, sociopathic, and irresponsible decision that has had serious consequences for those of us who received the vaccinations. And silence is, after all, consent.

  "It is time for the unvaccinated to take responsibility for their actions and to work with the rest of us to find a solution to this crisis. We cannot afford to let their selfishness and lack of action continue to harm our communities. It is time for the unvaccinated to step up and do the right thing. The unvaccinated should by any moral measuring stick have done more to warn about the potential risks -- to help us make informed decisions about our health. And they must now ask us for our forgiveness.

  "And, hand to heart, we may just give it to them. Because we are good people. We took those injections because it was the right thing to do -- until it wasn't."

     Say what? Nobody tried to warn you people? Maybe getting the word out was made a little difficult by your instance that anybody who disputed the Loyalty Vaxx be silenced, deplatformed, marginalized: if not jailed, 'frozen out of society', or killed outright---but I think that most of us tried as hard as we could. My own doctor and most medical staff at my clinic were forced out of their jobs for trying to warn the State Health bureaucrats that the Vaxx was dangerous.

    Maybe the reason a lot of professionals didn't do things like going on speaking tours was because of the (wholly illegal) things like travel-bans, and restricted entry into venues that your side insisted on. 

    Actually, though, your first clue should have been when all of those Corporate bosses at Big Pharma wouldn't take the Vaxx themselves, and wouldn't even release their life-saving miracle drug until Governments agreed to release them from legal liability for any complications. Your second clue should have been watching celebrities and paid spokesmen keel over dead in the middle of live, pro-Vaxx propaganda speeches.

   Last but not least, I don't need nor want your forgiveness. You can take your hubris all the way to the cemetery with you, and afterwards explain to God about how unfair you think it all was. 


   We've been hearing a lot of stories recently about people who've seen the light on the Vaxx issue, but articles like this ought to remind us that the spirit behind the Scamdemic Hysteria is still very much alive and well. Whatever the next 'crisis' the Power Junkies have planned for us is going to see the same levels of witch-hunting and mass-panic that the last one did. Last year, when the Ukraine Conflict and a wave of anti-Russian frenzy swept the country, I knew then that we---collectively speaking--- hadn't learned anything. 

   In fact, maybe this article was planted for the purpose of scapegoating the Unvaxxed, as part of a Second Phase of persecution? With waves of vaxx-related deaths becoming impossible to hide, maybe the Regime is floating a sort of pseudo-medical version of 'White Guilt.' That may sound far-fetched, but Ameroboobs are dumb enough to fall for it: witness how easily they reversed four years of propaganda promoting Electoral Fraud in 2020; or how easily they changed the 'narratives' on legal marijuana and homo 'equality.' If more articles like these start appearing, it's time to beware. 




Monday, January 23, 2023


      Last Sunday was Chinese New Year; and as the Asiatic peoples reckon their calendars by cycles, 2023 is the Year of the Rabbit. Rabbits are, of course, symbolic of things like fertility, creativity, and new beginnings in general. Somewhat ironically, Xi Jinping---who recently consolidated the Chinese Communist Party behind him for an unprecedented third term as president---addressed a conspicuously COVID-masked audience of Party members, stating that: "The new journey ahead will be a long one filled with glories and dreams. There are no shortcuts and only actions count. The glorious past was created through hard work, and only through solid work can a better future be created. In traditional Chinese culture, the rabbit is considered smart and agile, pure and kind, as well as peaceful and happy. It is our hope that the people, especially the youth, can forge ahead with swift action like rabbits and fully display their charm and their abilities in their respective sectors."

    One cannot help but wonder, in light of a rather unsettling report that hit the news just before the weekend if Xi's appeal to the youth in the last sentence doesn't carry something of a double meaning. For the first time since 1961, China is seeing a significant population drop; and for the first time since reliable numbers have been kept will no longer be the most populous nation

    Like every other time that something negative happens in China, the jackals in the Western Media were quick to pounce upon the story, predicting China's imminent downfall, etc. This is completely ignoring the fact that Western Countries have an even worse problem with declining birthrates. In the United States this is exacerbated by falling fertility rates, skyrocketing stillbirths and defective children---along with the uncomfortable fact that a large percentage of people under 30 identify as non-binary. China, meanwhile, still has a large enough population to reverse the trend and a government that actually solves problems. 

   This isn't to say that past Chinese policies didn't create the problem in the first place: and it ought to be instructive to Western so-called Democracies how the Chinese got into this situation. Critics are quick to point out that the disastrous 'One Child Policy' instituted by Deng Xiaoping was a major cause of the decline. There is truth to this; although the Corporate Media very prudentently is downplaying this aspect in light of their Corporate Masters' own depopulation agendas. Xi Jinping scrapped this policy and instituted reforms based on the very successful Russian model. It remains to be seen whether or not China's policies---which were considerably modified from Russia's--- turns around the declining birthrate as it has done for Russia. 

   The argument that most in the punditocracy seems to be following is the commonly-believed academic mythos that populations inevitably decline as societies transition from poorer agrarian economies to wealthier industrial ones. That belief is yet another specimen of the Scientism mentioned in the previous article. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, birthrates exploded in Western industrial countries as more wealth came in. In Latin America, birthrates continue to be high today in spite of increasing urbanization; and in the Middle East some of the world's highest birthrates are among the wealthy oil-producing Gulf States. 

   Deng's Administration in China bought into the same pseudoscience that Western 'planners' bought into. One is that overpopulation is really a 'crisis' that can't be solved by technology. Like most of these dogmatic pseudo-intellectuals, the population alarmists in China didn't foresee that within just a few years their own countrymen would be among the world leaders in creating self-sustaining biodomes and actual terraforming---not to mention becoming a world leader reclaiming waste and sea water and introducing improved agricultural methods. In contrast, our countries have simply focused on downsizing and limiting resources instead of learning new ways to increase them. 

   China also contributed to its own decline by buying into the Western notions of 'female empowerment' by instituting late-term abortions and encouraging female participation in the workplace. These policies had the same effect that they've had in the US; it discouraged men from raising and supporting families. Though not widely reported in China, young men there are suffering from much of the same sense of alienation and lack of purpose that American men are. Drug abuse and suicides are high there as well; although not to the extent of our percentages. Again, China is taking steps to remedy this situation. While the CPC doesn't seem to have much interest in restricting abortion, they have taken the steps of extending maternity leave and giving tax breaks to women who leave careers to become full-time mothers. They've also resisted Western pressure against early marriages and have loosened immigration laws for Chinese men who marry foreign wives. 

    In the long run, China will again likely prove the naysayers and smart boys wrong. That's one major reason why China is not a failed society like we are: they're able to learn from their mistakes. Their major mistake has been that centralized family planning doesn't work---a fact that Americans don't seem to grasp. Yes, the Government can do certain things to encourage and support families, but Governments can't take the family's place in any society. The French Jacobins, Russian Bolsheviks and the Khmer Rouge all tried it; and all failed. China's experiment with the One Child Policy was on a trajectory to bring down China had the Commissars not caught it and corrected it in time. 

   However, since the Clinton Co-Presidency, Americans have bought wholly into the It takes a village to raise a child nonsense. We're paying a stiff price for it now; though drugs and denialism (along with considerable scapegoating) have blinded most Americans to how bad the situation is. 

     The vermin in the Media along with the Academic Mafia have been trying desperately to blame the now-obvious American population decline on the Scamdemic. The fact is that immigration has been the only thing propping up our numbers for decades. There's no real amount of figure-juggling which can explain away the fact that the average American family has 1.66 children today compared with the high of 3.7 in 1959. Two-thirds of US counties have been experiencing a loss of people under 25  for the last twenty-three years

     The Oligarchs, such as the criminals at the Davos Forum, want population decline. Like the Nazis and Social Darwinists who were their ideological forefathers, the Corporate Clique sees everything in terms of cost-benefit and human beings are, of course, nothing more than human capital. The Utopia envisioned by these scum have themselves at the top of an largely-automated and technocratic economic pyramid with only the barest numbers of serfs actually needed to perform labor are allowed to exist. Smaller numbers are more easily controlled in a technocratic society than large populations. 

    That aside, however, it isn't as though the American people are doing a lot to build stronger families either. In 2020, about 10-15% of women nationwide visited an abortion mill. Before we start clutching our bow-ties, consider that very 'Red States' like Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Kansas were among the top percentages. Likewise, Red States account for 7 out the top 10 States with the highest divorce rates. Only 58% of American children and teens live with both their biological parents. 33% grow up without fathers at all.

    Maybe instead of gloating over what might happen to China, we ought to pay a little more attention to what's very likely going to happen to us. When we have an unsustainable aging population---well, only need look back at some of the suggestions for the superfluous man that were seriously floated during the Scamdemic to get an idea of what could happen. 

   Of course, in a culture where marijuana is a greater cash crop than wheat; porn is a bigger industry than sports; and drag queens win beauty contests: the concept of responsible parenting is probably a hard sell. 



Friday, January 20, 2023


     Here in the Prozac Nation: the land of drugs, the Rainbow Flag, and Scientism, there is a tendency to tout our alleged 'exceptionalism'. This is despite being one of the most dysfunctional cultures on the globe. This dysfunction and ignorance is especially apparent when stories (and weird theories) about human sexuality are circulating in the news. Given the high percentage of perverts working in the American Media, it's probably not surprising that there's a strange obsession with a subject that nearly every other culture on the planet understands quite well. 

    I've said before and will say again that American culture is simultaneously the most sex-obsessed and sex-negative culture in the world. American attitudes towards sexuality are literally like this weird cross between Pol Pot's Cambodia and the Weimar Republic. We hardly need to give examples. In the public schools, paedohysteria exists side-by-side with overt homosexual grooming. Major institutions will summarily fire anyone who engages in flirting with the opposite sex; the same entity will also dismiss anyone who believes that executives hanging out in gay-bars is scandalous. So-called 'Pride Parades' are displayed in every major city while beauty pageants are called 'sexist.' Pornography makes more money than all major US sports' leagues combined; women are routinely profiled in the MSM for making six figures in the industry while any man who gets caught looking at it is held up to shame and ridicule. And so on and so on: the examples are endless. It's gotten so bad that Martin Luther King---the last remaining American with an official holiday named for him---was celebrated in statuary on Monday by depicting two pairs of hands grasping a phallus. I'm not even going to comment on that one. 

     In such an atmosphere of repression and ignorance, Scientism naturally finds a wide field for operation. Science long ago split from religion and philosophy; later it split from objectivity; today (for the right price) it even disregards Common Sense. Science today is full of good old-fashioned sorcery where one's wish is Science's command. They tell us (with no evidence) that gender roles are nothing but artificial social constructs and that one's birth gender is irrelevant. The fact that mathematically there should be as many women identifying as men instead of the reality that 99% of gender-switches are male to female doesn't factor in. A woman doesn't want to be a mother and mumbo-jumbo  presto chango a baby is magically transformed into a mass of disposable tissue. In fact, in some States, it isn't really a baby until somewhere between 15 weeks and 9 months---then aborting it is murder whereas just a few moments before it wasn't human. Or like so-called age of consent laws: a girl aged 17 years, 11 months and 364 days is a 'child': the very next day she can legally work for a Strip Club. The 'settled science' is full of magic numbers just like the occult formulas of old. 

     On the subject of female sexuality, a little-known surgical procedure is being touted by social media influencers to cure another age-old problem: the loss of virginity. For the bargain price of just $10,000, women can now magically erase even a lifetime of bad choices and start all over again

     "A Miami woman is claiming she underwent hymen reconstruction surgery because she wants to have sex like it’s the very first time.Influencer Júlia Medeiros, who has made headlines for looking like Kylie Jenner, explained she endured the $10,000 procedure because she wasn’t happy with the way...{her first experience worked out}." (I'll have to note here that the linked article is a bit on the vulgar side in how it's written: the reporter evidently was a bit wound up over this interview.)

     I suppose with Bruce Jenner's daughter as a role model, the idea of re-arranging one's sexuality came naturally to Miss Julia. But there are a few of us old fuddie-duddies and judgemental bigots out there who are a bit skeptical that sexual virginity is something which can be magically bestowed by a witch doctor reconstructive surgeon. Dead White Male Noah Webster explains that virginity is "Maidenhood; the state of having had no carnal knowledge of man." That definition strongly suggests that virginity is a state of being, not a state of mind: and since this state of being hinges on a past experience, it can't be regained once lost. 

   Miss Julia describes her first experience as follows: “I was a 17-year-old teenager when I lost my virginity to a 30-year-old guy. Just like many women, I was deceived. I was promised marriage and children like in fairy tales. It’s evident that once he got what he wanted, he didn’t keep anything he promised.” While I'm sympathetic and agree that the guy was a cad; this is part of growing up. People make mistakes and learn from them. This influencer seems to have bought into the cultural mythos that sex under unfavorable circumstances is irreversibly damaging. This myth stems from one of two sources, also both myths. The first was pointed out frequently by the late blogger Sir Guy: many women believe that sex equals love. The second is the Feminist myth that all sex is rape. The first is rooted in immaturity; the second in anger and resentment. I suspect that Julia's case is the former. She doesn't strike one as especially mature making statements like:

   “I always wanted to have that special moment for myself. I want it to be unique and romantic, like in fairy tales. That’s why I had the surgery,” Note that there's no sense here implying mutual pleasure with a man. Her ideas of sex are childish: like something a tween-age girl would imagine it to be like. 

   The other noteworthy thing about this attitude seems to be the presumption that only women ever have negative sexual experiences or unfulfilling sex. It may come as a shock to postmodern audiences, but yes, men have them too. We even have the testimony of men far more experienced in such matters than myself:

   Men can't do much about that either, except to become 'Red Pilled' and be a useless blot on society like Andrew Tate. We don't even have the option of surgery (which proves again that medicine can't restore virginity). What most normal men do is to admit that they made a mistake and move on. That's what normal women should do too. 

  Not surprisingly---just like the Abortion Racketeers---the proponents of Labiaplasty (as the procedure is called) assure their victims clients that they are undergoing a safe and legal procedure and that undergoing such surgery is somehow 'empowering' to women. Here is a statement from the British National Health Service (their equivalent to our CDC). Like our CDC, the NHS is totally under the thumb of Big Pharma, so if anything their concerns probably understate Labiaplasty's hazards.

  NHS notes thatYou may need up to 2 weeks off work to recover. It can take a couple of months for the skin to fully heal.

During this time you need to:

  • keep the area clean and free from infection
  • wear loose underwear and clothes to prevent rubbing
  • avoid sex for about 6 weeks
  • avoid physical activity for 6 to 12 weeks
  • use sanitary towels instead of tampons for a few weeks


   It's normal after a labiaplasty to have soreness, bruising and swelling for up to 2 weeks.

During this time, peeing and sitting may also be uncomfortable. You'll be given painkillers to help with this.A labiaplasty can occasionally result in:

  • bleeding
  • infection
  • scarring of tissue
  • reduced sensitivity of the genitals

Any type of operation also carries a small risk of:

  • a blood clot in a vein
  • an allergic reaction to the anaesthetic
   From what I've gathered in researching this subject the 'small risks' mentioned below are not exactly minor complications. In fact, none of this sounds especially minor or even merely inconvenient. 

   The bottom line here is that women shouldn't fall for this grift. While literal virginity can't be recovered, the late Sir Guy had a whole series explaining the dynamics behind it and gave solutions for free. What the quacks offer in contrast is much akin to the Red Pill Cult among men; a lot of costly and meaningless symbolism, appealing only to the sexually immature, that has no purpose without a change in attitude and perspective. Both need to grow up, accept responsibility and reality and will do them more good than listening to the charlatans and their magic fixes.

Sunday, January 15, 2023


      There's not much dispute among anyone cognizant of the facts, that postmodern Western Culture---the Anglosphere specifically---has been denigrating and depreciating masculinity to the point where it has become an actual social crisis. A little over a decade ago, the Manosphere came into being online to help support men, especially the younger ones who've grown up in an atmosphere of discouragement; without positive role models or sources of reliable advice. Sadly, the Manosphere's good work has been hindered largely by a collection of de facto cultists who've invaded the space with scammers, 'pick-up artists,' militant incels, misogynists, white supremacists, and all manner of other moonbats. 


    There's really nothing new about what these 'Red Pilled' types are teaching. During the Early Roman Empire, the poet Ovid wrote a PUA manual called The Art of Love. After Caesar Augustus read it, he banished Ovid to the Asiatic Border, saying that he could preach his ideals to the Barbarians where they belong. Most of today's Red Pills end up about the same way.

   In the wake of the recent downfall of Red Pill cornball Andrew Tate, his disciples across the Internet have been flooding various forums in his defense. No cultist likes to see their gurus in jail; especially when they've paid a lot of money for online courses teaching them how to be 'Alphas' and not let things like that happen to them too. It never seems to occur to these deluded chumps that all of their various spokesmen seem to come to bad ends. From the deep recesses of a foreign dungeon, Tate sent word to his loyal followers:

  Which seems a bit paradoxical coming from a guy who's built a fortune bilking other men to buy all his seminars on how to be a real man just like him, and learning from his experiences. Presumably, he means everyone else's writings and experiences are of no value. However, it is fairly typical of cult leaders not to encourage reading books; because books often have ideas contrary to what we're being told. That's why the 'woke' Left hates books too.

   Norwegian author and blogger Bjorn Bull-Hansen promotes a healthier version of masculinity in his writings and broadcasts. This week, he took these losers to task in a half-hour video

   "There is nothing that is less masculine than getting involved in online disagreements; going back-and-forth in the comments sections, calling other people names; posting internet images just to make a scene or create drama...Traditionally this is something women are said to do: they gossip, and they use bad words about people behind their backs, this not's being a Drama Queen."

    I wish I'd thought of that one. It's probably a cultural oversight: in America, we're so surrounded by Drama Queens that their behavior goes unnoticed. But Bjorn is right: these manly Alpha leaders carry on online like a bunch of fishwives: gossiping, backbiting, finger-pointing is a major part of their personalities. That's how Tate got thrown in jail in the first place: he couldn't resist provoking a spat with Greta Thunberg; and when she questioned his manhood he had such a meltdown that he doxxed himself to the police where he had an outstanding warrant. 

   D.H. Lawrence, an English writer of the last century (now Dead White Male) pointed out that historically when masculinity degenerates, women tend to take on the worst aspects of men and vice-verse. There are only two genders (despite what woke academia says), and Lawrence pointed out the roles might reverse but the polarity stays in place. I've pointed out here many times that most of what we see among the Red Pills is just inverted Feminism. Bjorn continues:

   "These charlatans tell us that if you just pay money for some online courses; you will have lots of money, lots of women, fancy cars. I suppose that you all understand that that's a lie: it's not how the world works; and if you have goals like that I would say that you're not a man, you're a boy and you need to grow up."

  Now there's certainly nothing wrong with men being rich, having a cool car and female admirers; the problem with these Red Pills is that 1) they define masculinity by having these material things; and 2) they teach that good things come without working for them, or producing anything. As proof of this, we probably all know men who live well who are great men; and we all know a lot of them who are the most worthless poltroons. A man's masculinity is not defined by his circumstances. 

  "Masculinity is not easy money, it's not fast cars, it's not about easy women. That's not masculinity. It really isn't. Masculinity is about making an effort, hard work, being empathic and caring for your loved ones. Masculinity is about building, not tearing down. And that's what's important...

  "As a father, I have a daughter and can tell you: if someone like that came here---no matter who he was---he would be physically removed from my property in an instant. That's what fathers need to do; it's part of being a father. And if you'd done your job as a father right, that situation would never arise because your daughter would not be interested in that sort; she would see that that is not a real man, just a stupid moron and she will never get involved with people like that."

   Exactly. Particularly in this country we have a massive failure of fatherhood that the Manosphere over here ignores completely. It's not only a failure of fathers; Bjorn points out (correctly) that there's been a relative silence on the sociopolitical Right when it comes to calling out this kind of behavior. This, sadly, is largely because the Red Pills are politically aligned with the Right, if only as a fringe element; and too many on the Right are willing to sacrifice principle for political gain. In much the same way, they look the other way at the woke behavior of Milo Yiannopoulos, Nick Fuentes, and Bruce Jenner as if the toxicity of their presence was of no importance.

   As expected, several Red Pills appeared in the comments; mostly corroborating with their own words everything Bjorn said of them. What was really interesting was reading some of the female comments, lest any of the lost boys out there imagine that 'getting Game' really impresses women:

I absolutely love this guy. He is educated, worldly and very kind. I learn so much from watching him and get a feeling of calm from his Norwegian accent. Manners, handsome (very!) and intelligence all in one amazing man. I appreciate you, Mr. Hansen.

I agree 100%. I live in near Los Angeles and I haven’t come across any masculine men in a very long time. I rather be alone than be involved with a womanized man

As a woman what I had noticed watching these people's channels, is that there is a key part sorely missing, and that is the fact that these men are not educating themselves and their viewers as to what red flags they themselves as men are giving off. They act like they're perfect, and that women's toxicity is the only toxicity.

You absolutely right, men gossiping is not masculine and is seen traditionally among women, 😫 a lot of men in my life are not masculine, they are lazy and care for nothing. I would like to have met a masculine man but have given up on this in the past few years I’m still young but am prepared to be alone than settle for a man who is a drama queen. ⭐💛

Never heard about Manosphere before. They seem scary, weird.

As a woman - the manosphere has infected the minds of men - making them dangerous to interact with if you are a woman. They seem to enjoy out right disrespecting women and think it is funny to do so. They don't even have a basic level of decency or maturity. An immature man who thrives on petty drama and enjoys 'hating' women is not a safe man to be around. The manosphere has reduced men to silly little boys. And has driven a wedge between men and women. Just wanted to say thank you for being a voice of maturity and reason. We need this now more than ever.

So true. Real women want real men. Thank you!

Unfortunately for Tate and his followers, it doesn't seem that their attitudes, posing, and posturing is doing much to attract the opposite sex. Women want men who behave like men and treat women with respect. Working a rockpile in a foreign jail while sending out tweets calling people who can read 'losers' isn't going to impress any normal woman. It shouldn't be impressive to men either.





Monday, January 9, 2023


      There have been a few articles going back and forth recently between the Official Media and the Controlled Opposition about the state of religion in America today. The latter of these has been publicizing a prayer-circle that took place during the NFL game where a player had fallen victim to the Loyalty Vaxx. The other side has been popping up with some surveys showing that regular attendance at religious services has suffered a sharp decline since the onset of the Scamdemic. 

     There is an explanation for this discrepancy, though not the ones that the MSM gives out. According to their theories, the isolation of the Scamdemic taught Americans to give more priority to personal spirituality than to the communal worship in church. To the Whacko Left Wing, working and believing together as a community is only bad when religious people do it. 

    I suspect that the actual reason for declining attendance is because of religious leaders' utter refusal to take a stand against Covidian restrictions: even to the point of remaining silent when churches were padlocked by armed stormtroopers, ministers thrown in jail; or when vicious Antifa/BLM goons were looting and desecrating churches. Likewise, there has been no calls from religious leaders to hold anyone accountable for these excesses since. 

    This Denialism, naturally, doesn't get restricted to the Left and supporters of the Junta. Our old friend, Victor Davis Hanson has penned yet another of his tedious jeremiads, which has gone viral across the Conservative Media for some inexplicable reason. While a fair percentage of what he complains about is factually correct, Hanson makes this astonishing conclusion: "We are beginning to wake up from a nightmare to a country we no longer recognize, and from a coup we never knew."

   Statements like these are infuriating, and to a large degree an insult to many of us. Nobody 'woke up' just yesterday to find our Republic had been hijacked overnight. I can remember Ronald Reagan warning us that our institutions and culture were under attack from organized elements. No sooner had Reagan left office than those elements sprang into action. The military, media, and universities were literally purged in the name of 'Political Correctness' and 'Diversity.' Careers and professions were destroyed. People were put on blacklists, unable again to find employment within the system. Political leaders and activists who took a stand were marginalized and many had their reputations smeared. I know. I was there. I was one of them. Where was Victor Davis Hanson? 

   Where were the likes of Hanson during the next two decades when the poison of 'wokeness' started spreading into the Legal System and throughout Corporate America? I'll tell you where he was: sitting out the 'coup' in safe, Koch-funded sinecures like Hillsdale College. He was spending the last three decades gaming the system, doing photo-ops with important people; going to country clubs, cocktail parties, and luxury cruises as his erstwhile colleagues were getting outsourced or cancelled. I don't recall him ever sticking his own neck out for what was right: 'I got mine, sux to be you' likely sums up his attitude towards his constituency in general.

     I have a difficult time expressing how deeply I despise 'Conservatives' like this. The only thing that many of us actually woke up to recently was seeing what a collection of frauds and poseurs most of 'Conservative' leadership really were. Men like this never really had any principles or beliefs that they were willing to stand for. The Conservative Cause was, and is, for them merely a set of selling-points---a marketing angle to hawk a political agenda. 

   Let's address some of VDH's points, so we can all gather an idea of what an out-of-touch poltroon he comes across as. He writes his article in series of questions, so we'll give him the answers.

  "Did Joe Biden issue an executive order allowing foreign nationals to walk across the border and reside in the United States as they pleased?" No, Barack Obama did in 2010---13 years ago.

  "Since when did money not have to be paid back? Who insisted that the more dollars the federal government printed, the more prosperity would follow? When did America embrace zero interest? Why do we believe $30 trillion in debt is no big deal?" Since Bush Jr. took a Budget Surplus and turned into a our first trillion dollar deficit and ordered the M3 Money Supply classified on 'national security grounds' in 2006---17 years ago.

  "When did clean-burning, cheap, and abundant natural gas become the equivalent to dirty coal? How did prized natural gas that had granted America’s wishes of energy self-sufficiency, reduced pollution, and inexpensive electricity become almost overnight a pariah fuel whose extraction was a war against nature? Which lawmakers, which laws, which votes of the people declared natural gas development and pipelines near criminal?" Since Bush Sr. signed on to UN Agenda 21 in 1992---31 years ago.

  "Was it not against federal law to swarm the homes of Supreme Court justices, to picket and to intimidate their households in efforts to affect their rulings?" Just out of curiosity: has the suspicious death of Justice Antonin Scalia ever been investigated? Too bad that he conveniently died right before the SCOTUS was about to vote on the legality of homo 'marriage' wasn't it? Scalia died in 2016---7 years ago.

  "Since when did Americans create a government Ministry of Truth? And on whose orders did the FBI contract private news organizations to censor stories it did not like and writers whom it feared?" Answer: when the Smith-Mundt Anti-Propaganda Act of 1948 was repealed in 2013---10 years ago.

  "How did we wake up one morning to new customs of impeaching a president over a phone call?"  Since the ridiculous publicity stunt of trying to impeach Bill Clinton over an extra-marital affair in 1998---25 years ago.

   "Was some state or federal law passed that allowed biological males to compete in female sports? Did Congress enact such a law? Did the Supreme Court guarantee that biological male students could shower in gym locker rooms with biological women? Were women ever asked to redefine the very sports they had championed?" This first started happening on a local level in 2014---9 years ago.

   "When did the government pass a law depriving Americans of their freedom during a pandemic?" When Bush Jr. signed the Continuity of Government Act into law; which specifically listed pandemics as one of the grounds for declaring extra-constitutional 'States of Emergency' in 2005---18 years ago.

   "Since when did the people decide that 70 percent of voters would not cast their ballots on Election Day? Was this revolutionary change the subject of a national debate, a heated congressional session, or the votes of dozens of state legislatures?" Oregon enacted the first such system in 1998---25 years ago.

   "When did the nation abruptly decide that theft is not a crime, assault not a felony? How can thieves walk out with bags of stolen goods, without the wrath of angry shoppers, much less fear of the law?" Roughly since 'Urban Renewal' became a policy roughly in the 1970s. Incidentally, they've been 'renewing' these communities ever since.

   "Was there ever a national debate about the terrified flight from Afghanistan?" Was there ever a debate about occupying Afghanistan for 20 years, or about the persecution of whistleblowers who exposed some of the crimes committed during that time? 

  "What happened to the once trusted FBI? Why almost overnight did its directors decide to mislead Congress, to deceive judges with concocted tales from fake dossiers and with doctored writs? Did Congress pass a law that our federal leaders in the FBI or CIA could lie with impunity under oath?" If VDH thinks that happened overnight, he apparently slept through the BCCI Scandal, the Waco Massacre, Ruby Ridge, and Chinagate---among other events from the 1990s.

   "Who redefined our military and with whose consent?" Bush Sr did when he announced that our military was in service to the NWO in 1990---33 years ago. That was followed up by the aforementioned military purges led by the Clinton Co-Presidency and Congressional Defense Committee Chair, Pat Schroeder.

    "Were Americans ever asked whether their universities could discriminate against their sons and daughters based on their race?" No; but it became official policy in an EEOC Directive in 1991---32 years ago.

     "How did it become physically dangerous to speak the truth on a campus? Whose idea was it to reboot racial segregation and bias as “theme houses,” “safe spaces,” and “diversity”?'" These Speech Codes and Diversity Enforcement began under Donna Shalala, Clinton's Commissar of Education around 1993---30 years ago. 

   So, the problems that Hanson suggests that we're all now waking up to have been going on for quite some time: the median of the examples he gives is 22 years. It hardly gives Conservatives much credibility to behave as though these are all problems that just came upon us a few weeks ago. To be fair, the people who really should be asking these questions are the Democrats. How did a Party that 50 years ago stood for families, workers, human rights, and promoted national self-sufficiency and self-defense turn into an authoritarian tool of special interests? 

   But the Left's problems aside, articles like Hanson's simply reinforce the growing perception that the American Right is a paper tiger which is rapidly losing any public confidence in its actual abilities to understand---let alone solve---the deep problems that our Republic is currently facing. It's beyond even the issue of the much-discussed leadership vacuum on the Right: there's not even an ideology that leaders could build on to begin with. 

   The major problem that the Right has is of course that these (and other issues) have been ongoing for an entire generation; and it's not exactly as though the Republicans can claim that it was all done despite their stalwart opposition. 


Thursday, January 5, 2023


       The story that's been sweeping the Internet here in the Prozac Nation is the medical emergency during Monday's NFL game between Buffalo and Cincinnati. Buffalo defensive back Damar Hamlin suddenly dropped unconscious and very nearly died. To its credit, the NFL does still have some very good medics, Hamlin was revived and sent to the hospital, suffering from heart failure. 

     Predictably, the hyenas in the Mainstream Media were quick to dismiss any suggestion that Hamlin's seizure was in any way related to the Loyalty Vaxx---of which 95% of NFL players had taken. The fact that Hamlin's condition hasn't been thoroughly analyzed of course is a matter of indifference. The fact that these sudden deaths are occurring at massive rates among the Vaxxed is also largely being ignored.

    No sooner had the announcement of Hamlin's recovery hit the news than the story broke that former NFL lineman Uche Nwaneri was found dead at his home in Lafayette, Indiana. Some might remember Nwaneri as a pro-Vaxx fanatic of the worst sort

     Hamlin has been the highest-profile American victim of this sudden wave of deaths; and it's becoming increasingly difficult for the Deep State to keep hiding how critical the situation has become. Unlike the Scamdemic year of 2020 when we saw a virtually unchanged death rate, we have seen a 40% increase in sudden allegedly 'unexplained' deaths since the Loyalty Vaxx was rolled out. The same Corporate Media/Medical-Industrial Complex which was desperately inflating COVID-19 deaths---anything from accidents, gunshot wounds, and drug overdoses could be 'COVID-related'---are now in the absurd position of coming up with the most ridiculous excuses to deny Vaxx-related deaths. Yet Ameroboobs keep believing the 'narrative' and keep paying the price.

    Shortly before Christmas, the US Center for Disease Control admitted that the last two years have seen a whopping 4000+% increase in America's already abysmal rates of stillbirths and miscarriages. The mortality rate among children and legal minors has skyrocketed as well. 

    All of this was entirely predictable (and preventable); but Americans insisted on shutting down opposing views no matter how professional the source, or how logical the argument. Those of us who stood up to the panic suffered considerable persecution for doing so; and actually only the incompetence of Government and Corporate bureaucracies prevented the persecution from being worse than it was. The question arises: now that we're faced with a real pandemic---one that was largely self-inflicted, how should we react?

   Norwegian author and blogger Bjorn Bull-Hansen has been doing a series of videos on this subject. While he agrees that those who were driving the Scamdemic should be brought to Justice, he says:

   "We now need to be supportive of those people who now have regrets. We should not be sitting there on our high horse and thinking that we're better than everyone...It shouldn't separate us; we need to be better than that. We should not shame anyone: what we need to do is to be there for everyone."

  These comments caused some controversy among his followers. Understandably, many of us who resisted feel a completely natural desire for revenge: more than once I've referred to certain Scamdemic supporters as collaborationists and many of them fully deserve the name. Some of the comments on Bjorn's video brought back unpleasant memories:

"I'm a teacher and seeing sickness on a scale I've never seen before. Everyone is sick, and they are sick over and over again. I nearly lost my job because I refused to get the shot, and I was shunned by my administration and nearly everyone else. I got an exemption and kept my job, but seeing what's happening to the students (especially) is heartbreaking and infuriating."

"I still remember them openly talking about arresting people who refused to get the jab. They wanted us fired from our jobs, removed from our homes, and our children taken away. There's no forgiveness for those people."

"I feel sorry but these people really turned against us who refused to take it .and they were happy watching us not joining restaurants being restricted. I think it should be a lesson that we should always stay together so that we can fight the evil people."

"I remember at my work ( 30-40 guys) we all agreed not to take the shot, but as the pressure was increased both from the employer and from the society more and more guys gave in and accepted it,in the end only I remained and the pressure was really tough to get me to take it too. I refused and was fired from work after 15 years but I'm glad I stood strong, the same goes for my wife. A lot of friends and colleagues are not with us anymore and others are very sick and I feel like it's getting worse."

"I am a hairstylist in WA state. The madness here is deep. We have a 86% vaxxed rate (so They say) & my clients are sick & my biz is a fraction of what it was pre-Plandemic. Clients that I have known & cared for for years turned on me like vipers when I said no to the juice. I was “outed” as a dirty unvaxxed & many don’t come to my salon anymore. I hear many have passed away or are having health issues. Only a few can see what is happening here. Most are still hypnotized. I pray they receive discernment, even if it is too late for them. Be kind. Practice patience. 🙏🏻"

"My mom's neighbour is a ambulance worker and he said the amount of heart attacks has skyrocketed since the vaxxing began. Also they're being told to keep quiet about it."

"'Bjorn forgets that a fair majority of the vaccinated wanted us unvaccinated DEAD. In Canada, my government & family treated me like a disgusting leper. That will NEVER be forgotten. Forgiveness must be earned."

I think that we need to approach this with some caution. Christ's maxim to be "as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves" really applies here. For the sake of convenience let's divide the people who took the Vaxx into the following four categories:

1. Children, legal minors, and others who had little to no choice but to take the Vaxx.

2. People who were sincere, but duped by 'experts' into taking it.

3. Go-along-to-get-along types who took the Vaxx for short-term advantage.

4. Those who promoted and profited off the Vaxx for long-term advantage.

There are obvious degrees of guilt here. I agree with Bjorn that we should be reaching out and supportive of those in groups 1 and 2. I'm hopeful that many of the medical specialists who were persecuted for their stands have as a future project a treatment to reverse or counteract the Vaxx' effects. Group 3 I think deserves whatever it gets. Yes, we should help them in the name of humanity and our treatment of them may cause a few of them to reflect on their own crimes, but forgiveness is a matter of choice in their case. Group 4 simply needs, in the name of Justice, to be put on trial and given dates with the hangman.

What the fates of Hamlin and Nwaneri should actually give us is not an opportunity to gloat; but should serve as a wake-up call that there are people near us who are suffering the consequences of very bad choices made by themselves or by others for them. The important thing to remember is that these people have been thrown under the bus and left to die by the very people they most trusted, just like we who formed the resistance were. If we're going to be angry at anyone, it's the smug, self-appointed 'Elites' who brought us to this place.