Sunday, June 20, 2021


   Today in the Prozac Nation we have a holiday of sorts, Fathers' Day. Once upon a time, being a husband and a father was actually an honorable thing. American men managed to degenerate to such a level that today fatherhood is an object of ridicule or contempt. The best-known head-of-household in the United States until recently was Bruce Jenner; and that fact alone illustrates what a hypocritical joke things like Fathers' Day have actually become. The fact that Fathers' Day falls in the middle of so-called 'Gay Pride Month' makes it even more of a pointless farce.

   We might be inclined to laugh at Jenner, but actually his life is a metaphor for the decline and fall of the American male. Jenner grew up in an upstate New York town where his own father had a job as a successful arborist. Young Bruce worked to become a star athlete and was a promising football player until sidelined with a knee injury. Like men were once taught to do---adapt, improvise, and overcome---Jenner switched to Track & Field and eventually qualified for the U.S. Olympic Team. He went on to win 12 of 13 competitions and set 10 world records. At the time of the Cold War and the national malaise of the mid-1970s, Jenner was a national hero in a country that badly needed one. 

   As America drifted into cynical postmodernism and heroes became just another marketing commodity, Jenner drifted into relative obscurity and through a series of broken marriages and hybrid families until Hollywood decided that it could profit off his decline and gave him a role in a reality-TV series. From national hero to a failed father in a home dominated by out-of-control females, Jenner finally suffered a nervous breakdown and renounced his masculinity altogether. Today, Jenner is a rising star again---this time in a political movement known for its masochistic males and its hypocrisy about standing for traditional family values. 

   Back when Psychology was still a legitimate science, Jenner would have been a case-study---and likely cured. Men who have a high need for achievement and significance but who find themselves in a family or social dynamic that treats them like has-beens and losers (wrongly) often see themselves as complete failures. When, in that same dynamic, women are idolized and preferred, that overwhelming sense of failure is sometimes transferred to gender identity. In other words, the man in this situation cannot stand the stress of feeling like a failure as a man, and feels a compulsion to be a success as the opposite sex. That situation parallels both contemporary familial and social norms, and it's small wonder that such a situation is producing Gender Identity Disorder on the scale that it is. The 'Red Pills' who make up the so-called 'Manosphere' are a variant of the same thing: feminized men who feel inferior but who try to cloak their Inferiority Complexes by affecting cartoonish 'Alpha Male' identities. 

  Though it may sound counter-intuitive, transgenderism---in most cases---is not a sexual disorder. It's real causes are typically rooted in obsessive-compulsive disorders which is why (when it was allowed to be treated), it had an exceptionally high cure-rate. Psychologists should be the ones sounding the loudest alarm against America's deconstruction of masculinity, but like most sciences today, Psychology is also for sale and 'reality' is simply whatever psychologists are paid to make it---which is making our social problems a lot worse instead. Recently, an abstract from the once-prestigious Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association caused some controversy online by fanning false guilt in White Americans. 

  "Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure."

    The ignoramus who wrote this thesis---and published it in a scholarly academic publication---has been in a university-level position and published articles in peer-review journals for over 20 years. Here's an reflective question for fathers---especially Conservative dads: how do you feel that you let people like this educate your children? Did you intervene? Did you organize, or stand up for your rights at school board and PTA meetings? Did you close your wallet to fake universities and colleges or did you close your eyes and ears instead and say: "Go along to get along! Academia isn't the real world! Just do what you have to do to get that sheepskin!" Think about that this Fathers' Day. 

   It should also be remarked that---whatever else it might be---the statements in the abstract are in no way grounded in Psychoanalytic Theory. Neither Freud nor any of his followers taught anything this revolting to reason. The APA bears a lot of responsibility too (while not necessarily literal fathers, they have a fatherly duty to society in the sense that they are all medical professionals) for allowing simpletons like this to have a platform and hold positions of influence. Did any of you protest what this man has been promoting, or did you look the other way as he brought in free publicity and fat foundation-grant checks? "Well, after all we have to stay competitive with other schools," "A little dissent doesn't hurt," "We have to be open-minded and tolerant of diverse viewpoints."  Yeah---tolerant to the point now where mental patients are running the therapy sessions and nobody cares as long as they pay the bills and you're protected from malpractice suits. 

     In 2020's America, Fathers' Day has ceased to have any meaning; and for most Americans today there's no actual concept of fatherhood to which they can really relate. This day needs to change: it needs to become a time of reflection on what men need to start doing to turn themselves around. 





Thursday, June 17, 2021


      So today the Junta---again with considerable GOP backing---established a new federal holiday called 'Juneteenth'. At least that's what it's called in the Corporate Media. Its actual title as spelled out in the legislation is Juneteenth National Independence Day. Yes, you've read that correctly. Just as Memorial Day seems to been supplanted by remembrances for our new national martyr, George Whats-His-Name, we now have an 'alternative' to Independence Day, the former name of July 4th. 

   Just in case anybody is interested, 195 of 209 Republican Congressmen (you know, our Conservative leadership) voted in favor of the new holiday. 

       I have an older dictionary written before Woke Culture by a dead White male who entered a definition of the term 'revolution' as: "In politics, a material or entire change in the constitution of government." With that definition in mind, let us consider that since it assumed power the current government has 1) established an alternative ensign to the national flag; 2) set up alternative holidays to the previous national ones; 3) jailed political opponents while clearly discriminating in policy against them; 4) pledging allegiance to foreign agendas (e.g. the UN and WEF) over the American Constitution; 5) repealed laws against desecrating national monuments while promoting alternative histories to be taught in all schools; and 6) expanded the police powers to spy upon and harass opponents.

    The question here is: how much more explicitly can the so-called 'Biden/Harris Administration' spell out that they are engaging in a revolutionary policy? And it ought also to be apparent that there's no real political opposition to any of this. Take, for example, the passage of Senate Bill 1260 last week. Congress' own official summary of 1260 reads:

   "The Office of Science and Technology Policy shall annually develop a strategy for the federal government to improve national competitiveness in science, research, and innovation to support the national security strategy. The Department of Commerce shall (1) establish a supply chain resiliency and crisis response program to address supply chain gaps and vulnerabilities in critical industries, (2) designate regional technology hubs to facilitate activities that support regional economic development that diffuses innovation around the United States, and (3) award grants to facilitate development and implementation of comprehensive regional technology strategies."

    Which essentially amounts to is turning what the Corporate Oligarchs were already doing in fields like domestic espionage and control of the national food supply on both land and at sea into national policies. Taxpayers will fund these programs from now on---relieving much of the financial strain on Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Agribusiness. Academia Incorporated will profit too: those same charming folks pushing policies like Project 1619. Incidentally, the Cabinet Minister to whom these 'scientists' report their progress is Gina Raimondo---formerly a governor distinguished for employing the National Guard to go door-to-door enforcing Scamdemic quarantines and setting up military roadblocks to enforce travel restrictions. 35 of 50 Republican Senators voted for her confirmation. 

   The Act also sets up a new directorate which " establishes various programs and activities" meaning a think-tank of sorts which will enforce the agenda. "This bill establishes a Directorate for Technology and Innovation in the National Science Foundation (NSF)...The goals of the directorate shall be, among other things, the strengthening of U.S. leadership in critical technologies through basic research in key technology focus areas, such as artificial intelligence, high performance computing, and advanced manufacturing, and the commercialization of those technologies to businesses in the United States." While such goods can be researched and sold here in the U.S., however, the manufacturing can be outsourced. The final draft of the Bill, released by the U.S. Senate, included other areas subsidized including advanced communication, bioengineering, and advanced energy. 

   What none of our 'Conservative' leadership seem to have noticed---nearly 20 GOP Senators voted for the new law---is that there is nothing in this law that couldn't be accomplished by the private sector---assuming that these technologies were intended to be put to good use. The fact that they are being monopolized by a handful of corrupt academics, arrogant bureaucrats, and fanatical corporate ideologues---with near no public transparency---leads us to suspect that their intentions are less than honorable here. 

    The Elites of course would never do anything as sinister as playing with human hybrids would they? Unfortunately, they not only would, they've already started. Two months before S.1260 was passed, a professional journal for microbiologists wrote: "A team of scientists from the U.S., China, and Spain reported Thursday they have created the first embryos that were part human and part monkey and kept them alive for up to 20 days in laboratory dishes." Although the project is allegedly all for the purpose of promoting human health, the story was first exposed by the Spanish Media after details of the secret experiments were leaked to them---the main secret being that a laboratory in China is handling all of this. 

    "In Spain, this type of research is heavily restricted and limited only to investigation into deadly diseases. 'We are doing the experiments with monkeys in China because, in principle, they cannot be done here because of lack of infrastructure,' explains the vice chancellor, who plays down the fact that her university is Catholic. 'What we want is to make progress for the sake of people who have a disease,' she adds." The Whacko Left can laugh about 'conspiracy theories' all they want to; but it should strike thinking persons as rather peculiar that so many of these projects, ostensibly for the benefit of all humanity, are shrouded in secrecy and generally treated like military weapons-development projects. 

    The Regime has promised to elevate our loosely federated science bureaucracies to a Cabinet-level position, and to that end, elevated Dr. Eric Lander to the post of National Science Advisor. Lander is a long-time Deep-State spook: affiliated with Jeffery Epstein and the latter's donations to bioengineering and transhumanism at MIT's Broad Institute. He formerly served on Obama's staff and was involved with the Human Genome Project. BTW, 45 of 50 Republican Senators voted to confirm Lander, despite knowing who and what he is; and what he's liable to be doing. 

   If one reads through the typical 'conservative' news site, we rarely encounter stories like these. Oh yes, we'll hear much outrage over what those Libtards are doing to our country, but it's not often that it's noted that the Republican Party, for the most part, is wholly going along with all of it. It should have been apparent what this party really stood for when it failed to support our legitimate President and not only allowed, but actively participated in, the Putsch which elevated the Regime to power. This is why I advocate often that we---who actually believe in Conservative values---should disregard any of this talk about upcoming elections and get it through our heads that we are living under an embryonic---but soon to be fully-blown---dictatorship. Forget 2022---it's not going to happen. Not to say that recent Republican majorities did anything anyway; but the Elites simply don't need even a token opposition any more. 






Tuesday, June 15, 2021


       Our last post stirred up some discussion on InsantyBytes' blog, and tangentially over at Pastor Doug Wilson's site. A couple of good questions were raised about the state of society---and what defines 'normal.' 

       IB takes the position that there really hasn't been a 'normal' and says that "most of human history is just dominated by endless greed, perpetual injustice, and random acts of brutal and pointless violence." There's truth in that statement. Consider that Jesus and Socrates---who are considered the most influential figures in Western thought---were both judicially murdered by their own communities. It's quite remarkable that men and women most noted for taking courageous positions rarely die in peaceful, comfortable circumstances. Yet, it brings up another interesting question: why do we remember such people as martyrs and respect them?

     Pastor Wilson says that  "the grievous problem with normals is that they want a stable traditional house with no foundation, which is something that Jesus said they can’t have...all this has happened in a culture that was ostensibly Christian. There has been a falling away, even if some of the individual participants have no Christian background to speak of. The language of the movement, particularly with their twisted appeals to justice, has been an attempt lull a complacent erstwhile Christian culture to sleep." There's truth in this also; or more accurately, there would have been had he written this in say, 1991 as opposed to 2021. The 'Christian Culture' he speaks of marked the now-extinct WW1 Generation and the now nearly-defunct WW2 Generation. In fact, it was the 1970s and 1980s which saw the rise of a 'woke' church and a split with a 'fundamentalist' faction. Among Protestants today we have 'liberal' and 'conservative' denominations; whereas among Catholics the split is internal within the Church but still quite apparent. 

    Both writers, though, make a point that we alluded to in our last article: that is, that even though we are currently engulfed in a culture where evil and insanity prevails, there's a latent sense that all of this is abnormal. Wilson is correct that the Left is motivated by hatred for the Normal and IB is correct that the Churchian Right is motivated by a desire to go along with it all and pretend it doesn't effect them. But is that how it has always been? 

   All of Western tradition has held that Man is separated from God by sin. The Ancient Pagans taught that, since God alone was Perfect, man was liable to sin and error. Recognizing and imitating the goodness of God was the key to salvation in their system. Christianity taught---via the Jewish theology--- of man's fall through the influence of an evil principle, and the need for a Redeemer, which was fulfilled in Christ. Both the Jews and the Pagans saw that Righteousness came from God and that right living was the normal way of society. However, the prophets of one culture and the philosophers of the other rarely escaped violent deaths for saying so. Yet, that brings us back to our original question---why is righteousness respected (and at least nominally) believed in while at the same time utterly antithetical to the behavior of the culture at large? If humanity were hopelessly deranged it seems that it logically would follow that they would dedicate churches to Joseph Caiaphas, Pontius Pilate, and Judas Iscariot instead of to Christ and His disciples. 

   I think that Insanity Bytes is very near the truth when she says:  "Indeed, the world does not want to change, in fact, it doesn’t even realize it is broken. Much like vampires cannot even see their own reflection, the world cannot see itself in a mirror either." I would say that the truth is closer to the world seeing itself in the mirror alright, it's that they afterwards either claim that mirrors don't really exist (the contemporary Left), or claim that the reflection is of somebody else (the contemporary Right). The one who says, "no, that's really what we look like in reality---we need to change" is the one who gets burned at the stake. 

    What differentiates our postmodern culture from previous times is that our forefathers actually believed in mirrors; they called it conscience. Nota bene: many of those who participated in Christ's Crucifixion later repented and became Christians. A conscience is a thing that many of our contemporaries notably lack. This is why when Wilson hopes to 
"say this to all the current stars in the evangelical firmament—to all the big conference speakers, to the seminary presidents, to the curators of the big blogs, to the leaders of denominations, to the publishers of books and magazines, to the names on dust jackets and to the givers of blurbs—you must repent," ---his hopes are resting upon an illusion. In fact, he actually has a better chance of converting the Left: they at least are dimly aware of a need for atonement, but are running from it. Recall that Jesus told the Pharisees, "If you were blind you would have no sin; but now you say 'we see', and therefore you remain in sin." Past historical periods were either characterized by high morality or rampant immorality; but amorality---complete indifference to right and wrong--- is the prevailing moral position. 

    If anyone doubts this, just look at our society's growing acceptance of/apathy towards transhumanism. Last week, for example, the Junta (with the complicity of 19 'Conservative' Senators), enacted into law a scheme to subsidize the Tech Lords and Academia Incorporated with taxpayer funds to advance the Great Reset's transhumanist agenda. This vastation of human conscience stems from the denial of belief in the human soul; just like the forsaking of human reason comes from denial of the human mind. Take away a man's conscience and he becomes a machine; take away his reason and he becomes an animal. Viewing mankind as robots or livestock can in no way be considered a 'normal' or mentally healthy outlook. 

   A fellow whom we had occasion to reference recently---a gentle giant named Samuel Little---was an example of a soulless, mindless beast.

With the skill of a predatory animal and the compulsive nature of a robot; Little hunted and methodically killed over 90 women (whom we know of); escaping justice several times by playing the 'race card' and relying on public apathy towards his choice of prey. Those degenerated academics who rhapsodize about 'man's place in nature' forget that Nature not only produces sheep; it produces man-eating tigers as well. Likewise, the arrogant Great Reset scum who imagine a world where they rule over the human herd as earthly gods, are likely to discover that a people who've lost their belief in a real God are not going to love, fear, or respect human impostors very much either. 

     While our race has never been perfect, our acknowledgement of our Divine parentage and our relationship to God is the normal state of affairs. It's noteworthy that, throughout the entire history of our civilization that the Pagan philosophers, Jewish priests, or Christian saints offered themselves as representatives of God, and invited all who were willing to come and learn how to serve God. It was corruption in these systems that led to bloodshed which was never in keeping with the spirit of their teachings. The Great Reset and 'New Normal' in contrast, relies upon degrading humanity in body, soul, and mind---by force if necessary---which fact alone proves it a false system. Their schemes ultimately will fail, regardless of the power and money they have at their disposal. We may find fault (from our perspectives) with God's Governance of the world, but God understands how and why the world works and neither we, nor the advocates of 'settled science' do. The Ancient Greeks had a proverb that "the dice of the Gods are always loaded," which, while it doesn't exactly convey a strictly Christian perspective, is pithy statement illustrating that challenging God's Will is a hopeless endeavor. 

    By the same token, as the current social breakdown is based in abnormality, a close look can see that there are underlying fault lines that could reverse its course. The only thing that stands between social collapse and a revival is as simple as looking in a mirror. 




Saturday, June 12, 2021


     Back in the days when I was a cub, I remember going to a fairly successful old gentleman's small retail store to interview him about some information he had on a case we were working on. When we concluded, he said something in the sort of way that old men give advice to younger ones whom they respect: "Young man, you're out to save the world. The world---it doesn't want to be saved." 


    So, it's been two weeks since the last article and that old informant's words have come back every time I've sat down to write. I have to confess that the levels of disgust that I'm feeling towards our society right now has reached about a saturation point. I actually believed that the previous article would be the last one. A story about a girl whom nobody cares about who was killed by a thug who got away with murder; tossed out in the vain hope that somebody might speak up after nearly half a century and the even more forlorn hope that the authorities would do anything about it even if somebody did---what a fitting metaphor for the state of our cultural situation. But the same question I had after the interview decades ago keeps returning: "If nobody cares, why do you?" 

   I wish that I had an answer to that. I really haven't one. But even in that old cynic's case, if he really believed what he'd told me, he wouldn't have cared enough to give me what he believed was good advice. 

  What I tend to suspect, after a couple of weeks' reflection, is that empathy is a normal reaction to facing a problem. It's the new normal of apathy, hypocrisy, virtue-signalling, and narcissism that isn't a natural condition in the state of man. As psychologists of the Old School taught, the main characteristic of a neurotic is to evade facing an issue and instead doubling-down and reinforcing their aberrant attitudes and behaviors. Observing the sociopolitical American Left, that paradigm is obvious. Among the Right it's present too; but heavily camouflaged by a state of deep denial that looks superficially like concern for our national future. 

   I think that this is a source of the frustration most of us are feeling today. It's no longer a fight in 'the marketplace of ideas' where we can debate public policy. We are behaving like educators when what most of the public actually needs is something closer to a psychoanalyst. The beginning and the end of the Trump Administration taught us much about how serious the situation actually has become. When, at the beginning, Trump started draining the swamp, we learned that much of what we suspected about high-level corruption was not only true---it was even worse and more extensive than even many of us who'd spent decades exposing these parasites realized. Then at the (official) end of the Trump Administration, we discovered that the cultural degeneracy and general moral rot among the American population that we'd also sensed and warned against was more pervasive than we'd realized. Our 'exceptional American' turned out to be a walking corpse. 

   Liberals have always had a 'burn it all down' streak---which is just a psychological projection of their own self-hatred. What's worse though is that Conservatives---the ones who should know better---don't even want to face the reality that the edifice is on fire. (And that in spite of the fact that there have been literal fires in every major city for the past year). What seems to be becoming increasingly apparent is that all those much-despised RINO leadership in the GOP aren't holding their positions and getting re-elected simply through the handiwork of a handful of Party bosses. The past year ought to have impressed anybody that RINOs aren't much more than a reflection of their own constituencies. Reading through both the articles and comments on a typical Conservative website runs about like this: "Rule by decree, fake pandemics, close our businesses and our churches, turn thugs loose on the cities, overthrow the government, and set up a New Order: if you Liberals don't watch out, you're going to make us really mad! It's time we draw the line, and if you dare cross it, we'll draw another one! You'll all be sorry when Bruce Jenner's our next president!"

     So it's no longer even a question of whether or not the world wants to be saved; what we're really dealing with is a society living under the illusion that it doesn't need saving. This has been cultivated in our culture through a careful, scientifically programmed policy of proliferating narcotics and targeted propaganda. As a fail-safe against returning to reason or religion, the Elites built in a 'woke' ideology to substitute for faith and thought. They also tolerate a controlled opposition among the RINOs and the 'based' Red Pills where opponents can flutter off and vent in a harmless (to their interests) way. The worst betrayal I feel with our society is that Conservatives and Christians knew this was happening and let it happen anyway. The Left didn't just hijack the Schools, Media, and Medicine last November: they've been building up to this takeover for a long time. In 1988, there were warnings about how corporate/political interests taking over the media. In 1993, we were already well aware that our schools were being purged. And the first known reference to 'Big Pharma' has been traced to 1994. So 'Conservatives' have had 25-35 years to deal with these problems; and as far as I'm concerned, clutching their bow-ties now is as bad as Left-wing whacko virtue-signalling. 


    The time though is not to withdraw or turn MGTOW or join a stupid Red Pill cult. We have to keep in mind a few important things:

    1. That it is our culture that is out of step with Civilization and not us. We may be a minority, but the majority is corrupt.

   2. Mainstream Americans do not represent what the rest of the world thinks.

   Now is the time when it's most important to network with and support other like-minded people. But disengage, disunite, and disconnect from dependence on the Elites and their system as much as possible. The Elites' plan---at least for now---seems to be marginalization and we need to be prepared to depend upon each other as well as fending for ourselves. It's also important that we learn to distinguish who hasn't sold their minds and souls and who has. 





Saturday, May 29, 2021


     So this is the outset of an extended weekend here in the Prozac Nation. There are two official holidays this year; one is Memorial Day, when honor our brave men and women in uniform who were heroically padlocking churches and enforcing travel bans until recently. The Junta has also created a new holiday celebrating their official mascot: an Opioid addict and brutal thug who, during the course of an otherwise routine crime, managed to get himself killed and so secured a multi-million dollar payout for his previously-estranged family and their (totally disinterested) Civil Rights' attorneys. 

   But rather than waste any time with any of this nonsense, we thought we'd invite the few dozen readers that we still have to do something constructive. As many of you know, a close associate of ours is a volunteer researcher on various unsolved 'cold cases.' He's asked if we could elicit the public's help on a really difficult case. It's one of those cases where it's very likely that someone has information that can help; but without that information it may not be likely that it gets solved. 

   This case began on December 1st, 1972, when a man hunting deer in what was then a rural part of Laurel, Maryland came across a human skeleton. The skeleton had been lying on top the ground and there wasn't much left of the remains. The Medical Examiner concluded that it had been there 6 months to a year or more. They were able to determine that it belonged to a White female, no older than 25 or so with reddish or red-blonde hair. She was the victim of a homicide. Dental records showed that she had work done years before, but at the time of her death had an infected tooth. 

   No one claimed or identified her and the case went nowhere. In the late 1980s, a forensic sculptor created a new composite, which unfortunately only a Black & White copy has ever been issued. 

   Again, no one came forward with any information. It wasn't until late 2018 that serial killer Samuel Little confessed to the murder. Investigators concluded that his confession was genuine, based on that Little vividly recalled the now-nonexistent  route to the murder scene and, apparently correctly identified what she was wearing which matched a few fragments of fabric recovered at the scene (but not made public)---as well as his own extensive criminal record which placed him in the area at the time. Little, however, never revealed her name; claiming to have 'forgotten' it in spite of stalking her for three days and remembering many other things quite clearly. 

  "She wasn't a bad kid. She just met the wrong guy---me!" Little reportedly boasted to the investigators. He recalled being disappointed that it took so long to find the body because he'd hoped to read about it in the newspapers. The fiend went on to describe how she tearfully begged for her life before he choked her to death with his bare hands. 

   New information which Little was able to provide was that the victim was killed around May, 1972 and that he was giving her a ride from a Washington D.C. bus station where she had stopped to use a payphone. She was 19 years old, and was married, but was going through a bitter divorce. Apparently, the phone call was placed to her divorce attorney who announced it had been finalized the same day that Little killed her. He stated that she had recently had a baby and was originally from Massachusetts (he though from Springfield or possibly Salem). Little said that she was a prostitute (which is questionable since he referred to all women that way), and that he took to the murder site for consensual sex (which is also questionable given what Little's definition of 'consensual' likely was). 

   Little's confession narrowed down the times and places quite considerably, but not enough to form a basis of any meaningful research. There are no known reported Missing Persons whose descriptions more than tangentially match; and of course what happened to the baby is also an open question (there haven't been any reports of missing or murdered infants from that time or area either). Despite the apparent fact that the Doe was going through some rough times financially on account of the divorce (this was in the pre-'No Fault' era and Little's testimony implied that she had initiated the proceedings), she had some personal contacts. After 49 years, though, if anybody has any ideas, they need to speak up. 

      The agency in charge of the case is the Prince George's County Police Department which, to be fair, is underfunded and understaffed to be taking on many old cases. Also, to be fair, a nation that celebrates criminals like Samuel Little while prosecuting and defunding police officers for doing their jobs isn't likely to produce a work environment involving very much extra effort. However, reliable tips would be of great value because---despite the age of this crime---authorities do have viable DNA samples. The Medical Examiner's Office at 410-333-3250 is a good contact, or you can contact us in the comments and we'll help facilitate things. 

Wednesday, May 26, 2021


       A couple of important deadlines are approaching with the onset of the next month. The first is that President Trump's Executive Order 13925, which revoked legal liability for the Tech Lords' arbitrary restrictions on free speech, was repealed by the Junta on May 14th. That revocation will de facto go into effect in June; and even though the Oligarchs have been disregarding the law roughly since last November, they'll more or less have carte blanche from now on to take anybody down anytime they wish for any reason with no recourse to the writer. Oh, well. Orange Man Bad, now take the consequences. 

      The second upcoming deadline is a document dump of files relating to Unidentified Flying Objects, which is being treated by the Corporate Media like a re-release of The X Files. Forbes Magazine has already dubbed 2021 "The Year of the UFO." This data release also stems from a Trump Executive Order, which probably quite tellingly (and this is a fact that shouldn't be overlooked) the Junta has made a point of not revoking. In fact, quite the opposite has been happening: we're seeing a wave of 'leaked' UFO photos and statements; discussion is going on openly in the Media without the usual sneering and ridicule; there also seems to be a noticeable absence of 'fact-checkers', algorithms, and Youtube disclaimers usually pasted on whatever the Elites decide to term fake or questionable news. 

    So basically what we have is government run by Corporate Interests, upheld by Infotainment, a government which bases its policies on celebrity scientists who sell their reputations to the highest bidders, has taken some extra steps to curb free speech online and which has a history of faking news to fit their agendas on a colossal scale: these are the people who are going to make one of the most important statements about universal truths to a population which is---for all intents and purposes---scientifically illiterate. What could possibly go wrong in a scenario like that?  


    Earlier this month, we posted an article outlining some of the recent history and controversy surrounding these stratospheric phenomena. Then today, Disenchanted Scholar went ahead and touched the 'third rail' of this topic, with the suggestion that these occurrences might be demonic. Now, of course, in our enlightened and sophisticated postmodern era where there's no such thing as Evil (unless it's politically-correct evil which we all have official permission to hate), such a suggestion is bound to bring down hoots of derision. To my mind though, it brings to mind a saying of Voltaire's to the effect that "Atheists always demand proof of God's existence, but they never ask for proof that the Devil exists." I suppose since Voltaire's time, they have a consensus of Settled Science on that question too. 

   Except for one small detail: Disenchanted Scholar actually backs up this opinion with some hard facts."They’re not from another planet as they claim, but from another DIMENSION. Namely, Hades, Tartarus, the Hell of Biblical fame." 

   She adds that "fire is technically light too! How else would you (or a prophet) visualize it? So to say they’re creatures of light is technically correct! Distrust most New Age people about this. The New Age has been explained to me as The Age of Blood, a ‘great’ slaughter to earn the next stage or level or ‘peace.'"

   Whether they are from the Inferno or not, the important point is that what she says about extra-dimensional travel is correct. The doctors of all major religions teach that spiritual beings exist in a dimension unknown to us; hence what she says is logically possible. But assume for the moment that the beings visiting Earth live on a far-away planet. Now, even NASA has admitted that it wouldn't be at all a difficult matter to equip astronauts for a trip to Mars or even Jupiter or Saturn. The problem is the Time Barrier. Mars is doable, at about a seven-month trip. Jupiter is about six years. Saturn would be around eight years; we're talking ten or more years further out. The closest constellation to Earth, Centaurus, is a 100-year trip. 

    All of this means that beings from other planets would have to have the capacity to travel through the dimensions---specifically of time. 

   Let's draw an analogy. Suppose that you wanted to drive from Los Angeles to New York---in 15 minutes. A car operating on this kind of technology would suspend time relative to your position until you arrived in New York and find that only 15 minutes had passed. The other 48 hours that it normally would take are breached; in other words, your technology allows you to travel faster than time can pass. Needless to say, we have no idea how that could be done. That's in the physical dimension. Theologians teach that time does not exist in the spiritual realm---which, in theory, would make it possible for spiritual beings to move through time and space. While that sounds like a rather Mediaeval cosmology, it makes logical sense if one accepts the premise that angels, demons, and spirits exist. 

   So are these phenomena from the Infernal Regions? It's difficult to say. The Church has affirmed Marian Apparitions, and Mary would have come from Heaven through another dimension to get to Earth; not to mention the Incarnation of Christ, or some of the revelations given to Hebrew prophets. And other religions have claimed revelatory encounters as well---all the way down to stories of haunted houses and documented poltergeist activity. 

   Where this all leads us is that the probability of these objects being of extraterrestrial origin is very slim; that they are from an evil extradimension, possibly. That the current ruling Elite is going to turn the truth into a 'narrative' aimed at furthering their agendas, highly likely.

    This whole tale about "disclosure" has the stinky fingerprints of Klaus Schwab and his transhumanist merry-men all over it. Nothing would suit the purposes of these Great Reset nutcases better than a 'scientific revelation' from Above (i.e. a higher life form). Don't imagine for one minute---after what we've seen from 9/11 to the Color Revolution---that the boobs wouldn't fall for it. They'll laugh at God and the Golden Rule; but an actor posing as an alien (or maybe even a real devil)---they'll listen to that. 

    It's hard to say if it will go that far; but the bottom line here is: think for yourselves. Biden and his camarilla are proven liars and cheats. Do not take anything the Junta says about this at face value. Even if they say there's nothing to these sightings; investigate and find out what they really are. Or if they go the other way and lay some great revelation on the public: doubt every word of it until proven to your own satisfaction. Bear in mind that a lot of spooks have had plenty of time to play with this forthcoming evidence. 

   The only certainty I have at this point is whatever is coming out of this is unlikely to be anything good. Experience has taught us that whenever the Democrat Establishment, Mass Media Cartels, and Big Tech join up and start priming the public on a topic---something bad is about to happen. My real fear here is that, since they've failed to stop religion, they're going to invent a fake revelation from a 'higher power.' Let's not forget that these Great Reset clowns have a very specific role for religions in their overall schemes. 

    In reality, I would like nothing more than to see Mary and about a dozen of Archangels appear in the middle of those hearings and explain in no uncertain terms that God is displeased and show them all the future state of their souls if they continue in their evil ways. Seeing all of those smug Senators, Deep State spooks, and media shills on their knees repenting and vowing to make us a Christian nation again---now that's a scene I'd believe in. 


Friday, May 21, 2021


      There has been an interesting study conducted by the Cultural Research Center at Arizona Christian University making the rounds lately. The general theme for concern, as the Catholic League recently noted, is that the Millennial Generation shows a lack of traditionally Christian-based morality, with 43% flatly stating that they “don’t know, care, or believe that God exists.” That is about twice the percentage of the WW2 Generation. The survey defines Millennials as those born between 1984 and 2005. Only 48% agreed with the Golden Rule as a ideal of human relationships. The Golden Rule has always been a traditionally American moral point, as evidenced by the fact that 90% of the WW2 Generation ascribes to it, an even higher number than those among them who identify as Christians. 

    The survey had a few flaws in my opinion, but there are some interesting facts which can be gleaned from it. I think that few would deny at this point that both the Millennial and the so-called 'Generation Z' (the next group about to become legal adults) are problematic. There has been a cultural shift in the United States---a dramatic one---which has spanned only a few decades. 

   Personally, I fall somewhat in the middle of the generational spectrum, somewhere on the older cusp of Gen X. The generations most connected with my upbringing were the older batch of Boomers (the Vietnam War Era) and the WW2 Generation. I interacted with a few of the now-extinct WW1 Generation as well. A lot of today's elderly have remarked that the culture today is unrecognizable from their younger days, and I wholeheartedly agree: it's even different from the 1980s and 90s when I came of age. 

   We aren't talking here about the usual inter-generational topics. This shift is about more than technological advances, the length of men's hair or women's skirts; or modern tastes in music. What we've seen is a fundamental shift in core values and certain attitudes which are non-negotiable if we are to survive as a Constitutional Republic. Religious Faith is but aspect of this. There is a wholesale rejection of Science in favor of Scientism; Philosophy in favor of Ideology; History and Rule of Law in favor of Emotionalism---even gender, justice, and human rights are considered debatable issues. George Barna, who oversaw the CRC Study remarked that, 

   "For example, Millennials champion the concept of tolerating different points of view. Yet we see in the research that their behaviors—such as promoting getting even, situational treatment of other people, or censoring specific viewpoints or policies—conflicts with their alleged embrace of tolerance and diversity. In fact, Millennials are twice as likely as older adults to specify that the people they respect are those who hold the same religious and political views as they do. The attitudinal and behavioral evidence related to a variety of beliefs and related behaviors suggests that they are not a tolerant generation despite their self-image and public promotion as such."


      Not surprisingly, the Millennials have a low opinion of traditional families, as evidenced by the fact that the U.S. Birth Rate has been declining ever since they became roughly of child-bearing age. The study also found that the majority of them "consider an abortion performed to reduce personal economic or emotional discomfort to be morally acceptable," although the number of actual abortions has declined along with the birthrate. An independent poll found that 18% of the Millennial and Gen Z generations identify with the so-called 'LGBTQ' Lifestyle. The U.S. currently ranks 33rd of 36 developed countries in Infant Mortality. 

    The reason these numbers shouldn't surprise anybody is because about 20% of young American men can't produce testosterone levels sufficient to sire children; while 12% of young women are clinically infertile. But be sure to wear a mask in public because a flu outbreak with a 99% survival rate---that's a national crisis. 

    Now in addressing the causes of the decline in Millennial attitudes, Barna makes this astounding statement:

    "The family unit and traditional family practices have been reshaped, with some long-term, fundamental family ideals and practices outlawed. The responsibilities of government have been significantly broadened and transformed. The influence of the Christian church has diminished while the influence of arts, entertainment, and news media has exploded. As millions of parents discovered during the pandemic, public schools have become indoctrination farms rather than places for teaching basic life skills."

   Let's pause briefly and let what he just said sink in. 

  So, according to Barna's criteria, those of the Millennial Generation started being born around 1984. This means that they would have started hitting the public school system around 1990-91. Recall that this was a time when the Left really began its hostile takeover of the schools: introducing Political Correctness, Speech Codes, radical race and gender theories (i.e. Neo-Marxism), etc. Hillary Clinton introduced her It Takes a Village ideology about 1994. There were outright purges of Academia at all levels of Conservative instructors, texts, and educational paradigms all along the way. 

  But: "as millions of parents discovered during the pandemic, public schools have become indoctrination farms rather than places for teaching basic life skills." This is something that these 'millions of parents' didn't discover until just last year? Where in the H--l have they been? We're talking here about a generation who largely have gone from Kindergarten through College and their parents never noticed what they were being taught? Drag Queen Story Hours have been going on for five years. 

  I'm sorry if I've run out of patience with the Political Right. I've grown tired of listening to Conservatives carry on as if "The family unit and traditional family practices have been reshaped," and "The responsibilities of government have been significantly broadened and transformed," as if none of this existed before their children turned 18. The Xers and Boomers who raised the Millennials apparently didn't notice that "the influence of the Christian church has diminished while the influence of arts, entertainment, and news media has exploded."

  None of these parents evidently noticed that their offspring were growing up anti-religious, anti-democratic, and asexual. Where were they this whole time? 

  All of this fake outrage is just denial: denial for the responsibility that Conservative apathy, cowardice, indifference played in all of this. Boomers didn't earn the nickname 'The Me Generation' and Xers weren't called 'The Slacker Generation' for no reason. The Snowflake Generation was the result. The Millennials (mostly) and Generation Z (completely) have never lived during a time where Political Correctness, militarized police, dysfunctional families, and rampant drug abuse weren't normative. They've grown up in a world where surveillance cameras, metal detectors, corporate cronyism, and going-with-the-flow are the way that things have always been. "Safety First instead of Duty First," "Go Along to Get Along," "The Rights of Man are Discriminatory," "Always Believe the Children," are what they were taught, and now who's really shocked that they live by such dicta? All that they were given for guidance was whatever 'narrative' that Madison Avenue developed from week to week. 

   What last year did prove however, is that we're not only a nation of sheep: we've become a mixed herd of sheep, jackals, hogs, asses, and sloths. Then, was a time like no other in recent history where Conservatives had an opportunity to take a stand for their values; to show the younger generations that principles meant something and that some things were worth fighting for. And what happened? People stuck rags on their faces, bowed down to street savages, and did nothing when police forces put padlocks on churches and private businesses. Then they rolled over and acquiesced when a small group of putschists stole the Government without raising a finger in protest. 

   I believe that, for many Millennials and Z's, 2020 confirmed what most had grown up suspecting: that our "shared American values" were nothing but a load of hypocritical blather that not even their advocates were willing to stand up and defend. Into to the vacuum stepped the Cultural Marxist: "See" their teachers said, "it really was about protecting class privilege all along! They won't even defend what they supposedly believed in as eternal truths! Suspend their constitutions, burn their books and monuments, close their churches, insult them, and they scatter like chaff and are willing to sell their souls to the highest bidder! Wasn't Marx correct when he showed that family, faith, and democracy were all illusions?" And knowing nothing to the contrary, the younger generations couldn't discern between the benefits of real American Democracy and the counterfeit of it that our generation presented to them. 

   Can we turn this situation around? At this point, I don't believe that we can at a national level. We may be able to build some enclaves out of the rubble, but nothing is happen as long as the political Right persists in its policy of denying the reality of the situation; or worse, trying to pretend that nothing has fundamentally changed. The reality is that we failed the younger generations, and we have a failed nation and society to show for it. 



Wednesday, May 19, 2021


      We've had occasion to note recently that we Americans have (collectively speaking) lost our moral compass. People seem either to dismiss moral values as irrelevant; or else they've internalized the 'personal is political' nonsense and make their judgments based on what the herd's consensus of the moment happens to be. People on the Right are just as guilty of this as the NPCs on the Left. 

     Recently, I left a comment on a very pro-Israel article on a Conservative site about the current crisis in the Middle East. I pointed out that Israel isn't exactly an innocent victim in this conflict. Besides doing a few little things like its persecution of Christians, being one of the most brutal enforcers of the Scam-demic, and being a world leader in forced vaccines and vax passports, the Israeli Government has also fomented regional instability by sponsoring terrorism. Israel also is currently the world's leading exporter of domestic espionage technology. And let us not forget that after President Trump went out of his way and risked international outcry for his support of Israel, the Israeli Government unceremoniously threw Trump under the bus and jumped on the Biden bandwagon before the stolen election was even certified. Israel, incidentally, is the only Middle Eastern country which recognizes homo 'marriage' and one can see 'pride parades' in some of the most noted Holy Sites in the world. 

    Of course, the accusations of anti-semitism came fast and furious. Now, every regular reader here knows that I am not anti-Jewish and really have no issue with having Israel as an ally---but the same is true of any other ally: the Israelis need to start behaving like a civilized people and stop resting on its laurels of Cold War service to us. Israel, and the Jewish Community in general, keep getting a free pass and are quick to call anti-semitism like the Black Lives Matter gang are quick to call racism on everything. My grandparents' generation went to Europe and fought the Nazis, and their grandparents' generation beat down the Confederacy; so fighting for the Rights of Man is ingrained in my system. Yes, there was Slavery and the Holocaust, but I'm not guilty of either one; and the fact that one's ancestors were unjustly treated doesn't translate into a license for their descendants to commit the same crimes. 

   Besides the amorality of playing the 'Victim Card' by which Political Correctness excuses anything; our culture also is exhibiting a strong tendency towards fanaticism in political or social causes. There was a story just today in the New York Post stating that, even though New York is lifting its Mask Mandates, many of these COVID cranks are not letting go. And of course we've all seen the fanatical Left and the Great Reset kooks as well as the crackpots of the Vox Day Red-Pilled types on the Right. What is it in human nature that runs to these extremes and why are we seeing so much of it today?

     Victim-card playing is not difficult to explain. We see even small children doing it as a way to escape punishment. I recall once my nephew was playing with matches and actually burned a hole in a chair. Before he got a good spanking, he protested that a witch appeared and made him do it. I told him if that was true, he needed to punished for listening to witches. In a society we need to deal with Victim Cards the same way. 

    Fanaticism is more difficult to explain, but psychologist Theodore Reik pointed out that existential fear and doubt leads, in some people, an effort to suppress the attraction to the feared concept. This is not necessarily a bad thing because it depends on motivation. Reik distinguished fanaticism from what he called enthusiasm. The enthusiast in, for example, religion may subconsciously have doubts about his Faith, but these doubts are overpowered by his love for God and spurs him on to become even a saint. The Whacko Left Wing made a big deal a few years ago when some of the late Mother Teresa's private writings were published. Some expressed her occasional doubts of her faith and calling, but in reality this is predictable in a character like hers. The fact that she had doubts doesn't make her a hypocrite, it only shows that even saints are "subject to like passions as we are;" and her Left-Wing detractors only show their own ignorance. 

    If one wants to find hypocrites, just look for the smug, self-righteous types (like most Liberals) who know all the answers to everything and never entertain the slightest doubt that they might be wrong. Self-love is what motivates them to the point where today, rather than admit they're wrong, they change the 'narrative' and become the same pompous proponent of things they denounced just a few days before.

   Unlike the the Enthusiast, the fanatic is motivated by hatred. The fanatic also has doubts and fears, but he translates that hatred upon the object of his fears and goes after it with viciousness and brutality that defy reason. In the religious sphere, the late Reverend Fred Phelps was a good example of a fanatic. While Christians look upon homosexuality as a sin and desire to convert the sinner and lead him to a right way of life, Phelps would run around waving signs on the street that "God hates fags" and other obnoxious nonsense. Phelps was obviously a latent homosexual himself; and projected his self-hatred onto those who were more open about their perversion. Phelps represents no real Christian as St. John says "he who fears is not made perfect in Love." The religious enthusiast is aware of this, so they try to become more perfect in Love; the fanatic is just a fanatic no matter what creed he hides behind. 

    That is how one tells the difference between a committed believer in a cause and a fanatic. The committed believer is motivated by Love and is willing to sacrifice for the love of what he believes in. The fanatic on the other hand is consumed with destroying the opposite of whatever cause he nominally supports. It is very important to recognize the difference because in our morally bankrupt culture the tendency is to lump all beliefs and actions into a sort of Manichean dualism where actions or opinions define absolute good or absolute evil---depending upon which political position happens to accept such views as a majority. The example given earlier about disagreeing over U.S. support for Israel, and being called an 'anti-semite' and a 'left-wing Liberal' shows that this mindset has infected Conservatism to a great degree as well. 

    There are people on both sides of the political spectrum who talk of a Civil War 2.0 as the result of our divisions in this society. I'm very certain that many of those who talk like this genuinely desire that another civil war actually happens. Fanaticism and the 'personal is political' doctrine is a sure way to bring it about if such attitudes get deeply accepted as normative. 

   St. John also wrote that "a perfect Love casts out fear," and abandoning precepts like this are what got us to where we are today. Americans haven't always been the best examples of Christians, but previous generations trusted the Bible and its teachings when in doubt. The Left today snorts at the Bible as the work of Bronze Age Bigots while too many on the Right see it as impractical idealism. Both sides have adopted a 'win-at-all-costs' mentality which casts aside morality as an old-fashioned relic. Like Vox Day infamously asked his own deluded followers: "do you want to stand on principle or do you want to win?" That is neither a Christian nor a Conservative attitude---it's the language of a fanatic---because we either stand on principle or we're no better than what we oppose. I wouldn't want to live in any amoral utopia designed by Vox Day and his merry-men than I would living in one crafted by the Great Reset fanatics. 

    Moral Rectitude is neither Left nor Right; it simply is. Whenever we hear anybody on either side demanding 100% obedience to settled science or any other ideology; and expressing their desire to put dissenting sides down permanently, it's time to turn your heel and make some fast tracks away from them as quickly as possible.