THE WOKE RIGHT EMBRACES EUTHANASIA

    In their ongoing attempts to try and appear relevant in this year's Election Circus, the Conservative-Industrial Complex has taken on many woke positions---alongside their continual posturing about enforcing the New World Order more robustly than the Democrats. Their completely out-of-touch commentaries on the Trump Verdict---pretending that we had an absolutely pristine Justice System until last week---is getting laughed out of the news cycle, so they've apparently gone back to abandoning 'social issues' as part of their strategy of owning the Libtards.

   William Briggs had a good article up today showing the latest in these trends. Not satisfied apparently with going woke on Abortion, homo 'equality,' and drug legalization, the New Right is promoting euthanasia as a new 'Conservative' value. Richard Hanania of the shady Neocon think-tank the Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology, praised WEF Young Global Leader Mark Rutte's Holland for its for enlightened policies of reducing useless eaters. Following the case of Holland's extermination of a woman probably suffering from depression, Hanania wrote: "This woman was on a wait-list for three years {nota bene: since she was 26}. Doctors concluded it was hopeless after doing what they could {no doubt prompted by Big Pharma} What right do people think they have to tell her that she should go on? It's not your decision." 

   Hanania's position, as seen in his concluding statement, is basically the standard one of the New Right, typically expressed as "Why should I be responsible for others' bad choices?" Or, to use the Biblical expression: "Am I my brother's keeper?" 

   

    In the aftermath of the Second World War, government-sponsored programs to exterminate the 'unfit' through sterilization, abortion, euthanasia, genocide, and other means fell into great disfavor once the reality of what those policies actually translated to in practice became known. Proponents of Eugenics changed the name of their program to Population Control and sold the program to the Whacko Left Wing under various disguises as to their true objectives. In the case of Euthanasia, extermination of the unfit was re-sold as 'death with dignity' and other such nonsense. 

   Today, the New Right has taken the same arguments are re-selling them as free choice and the medical death-camps offering such services as part of the free market. All of this is further proof that amoral Capitalism is as grave a threat to civilization as godless dictatorships. Neither put the slightest value on human life other than as it serves the ends of the Corporation or State respectively. 

   Depopulation is, of course, part of the policy behind the Great Reset. The Whacko Left Wing has typically framed their support for such policies as the phony threat of overpopulation; that is, pretending that there is a scarcity of resources because there are too many people---not because the Woke Corporations have looted and mismanaged resources as well as suppressing new technologies to keep their stakeholders' profit-margins high. 

   The Right, however, seems to have taken a slightly different variation on the theme. The general feeling on that side seems to be that too many people are 'losers' who don't deserve any resources in the first place. In their minds, the earth belongs to the strong, and power and success are a measure of man's value. Now it is true that Christianity traditionally held that the meek shall inherit the earth and strongly suggested that the duty of the strong was to uplift and encourage the weak: but Churches today tend to ignore everything that Jesus taught and think of the Pharisee as the more realistic and pragmatic type. The Pharisee's prayer: "Lord I thank thee that I am not like the rest of mankind: rapacious, unrighteous, adulterers, or even as my neighbor here" seems to have replaced the Lord's Prayer as the new based and Red-Pilled doxology.

  The position of most religions is (or should be) that all life belongs to God and God alone decides when it should end. These days, though, that position gets a predictable response.

    Of course, people who deny this don't ask the next logical question: if God doesn't have the power over life and death, who does? That would be the State (according to the Whacko Left) or Big Pharma (according to the Woke Right). Now, if these smart-aleck Atheists or self-righteous Churchians would care to explain why governmental or corporate bureaucracies should be entrusted with God-like powers, please feel free to leave a comment. The myth of the Divine Right of Kings was exploded a long time ago, but it doesn't seem to me that presumed 'right' was inherited by anybody else.

   "But," somebody might object "Can't someone choose to end their life? Isn't it a personal decision?" Maybe so; but Euthanasia is hardly an individual choice. As Briggs points out: "All this is before we consider how the glamour of having a doctor kill you is portrayed, and how that affects weak minds. Minds susceptible to propaganda. Which you must know by now are the majority. Read what the killed woman said again: 'My whole friends and my support system, we really did it together'".

   What friends and a support-system actually would do in a less sick society is try to help someone this distraught overcome their despair and live up to their highest potential. We're to presume, of course, that these very non-judgemental persons in her support system only acted with the purest of motives: her 'friends' weren't hoping for a big slice of her estate; and the 'doctors' did all of this for free and didn't get a fat paycheck from Big Pharma. Certainly none of them cared about social media approval or publicity or anything like that.

   Unfortunately, the social atmosphere cultivated and promoted by the Corporate State today isn't one that promotes Life or self-fulfillment. Suicides are rampant throughout Western countries for a reason: our postmodern dystopia sees individuals as expendable, failures as inexcusable, and offers conformity to the shifting sands of public opinion as the highest goal in life. Alienation and isolation are encouraged in such a system to weed out the non-conformists, with occasional human sacrifices offered as an incentive. Drug addiction---the slower version of suicide---is also encouraged.

   In the larger scheme of things, the Right is once again failing to show how it is any improvement over the Left. Holding our noses and voting for Neocons isn't going to do much to revive our sense of responsibility towards our neighbors---which is something that we really need if we're going to Make America Great Again.

   

     

   

    

OF BOMBS AND BEACHFRONTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST

   So, as of this writing, the news is breaking that our brave xhes in uniform are valiantly protecting global Corporate interests and proving that Biden isn't a weenie after all by bombing four cities in Yemen. They were joined in this effort by forces supplied by Tienanmen Trudeau and the British, Dutch, and Bahraini Royal Families. The Pentagon claims that only Yemeni military sites were hit; although this is suspect since they've been telegraphing their intentions for at least the last week giving the Yemenis ample time to move their military assets. 

   We'll probably have more to say on this latest example of barbarism committed on behalf of the international commercial cartels in an upcoming article as more details are known. However, the Tech Lords are already busy ensuring that no disinformation gets out because trying to access Yemeni television currently gets this:

   What isn't a secret however, is that the Biden/Harris Junta and their Coalition toadies chose---quite coincidentally we're sure---the same day that the United Nations International Court of Justice began hearings into Zionist Genocide in Gaza. One would assume, with the combined civilian casualties now numbering around 100,000 in the last 90 days, that the UN might have noticed. Actually, since last October, the UN has proven itself to be completely useless---sort of like the international version of the Republican Party in the US. Even on the off-chance that the UNICJ actually finds the Zionists guilty of anything, the UN has no ability to enforce their decision. 

   The Biden/Harris Junta---which claims that it has seen no evidence of genocide in Gaza despite the Zionists' open admission that that is exactly what they are doing---is getting considerable support from so-called 'Conservative' leaders though the American Right still clings desperately to their narrative that Biden is somehow overly appeasing to the Palestinians. I hate to have to keep bringing this up to Christian Conservatives, but we are talking here about the murder of children; the number of whom is now somewhere around 10,000. 

   Not to worry, though, in addition to investment opportunities in the Gaza Oil Fields, shrewd sharpers who know how to game the system now have the ground-floor opportunity to invest in beachfront Gaza Real Estate. 

   

    No doubt this has become a discussion topic in most American Megachurches, and for all we know might even become part some retirement plans. The children of Gaza may not have much of a future, but that's no reason why Christians shouldn't capitalize on a golden opportunity, right?

    In case any Churchian Conservative might sustain a sudden, involuntarily spasm of conscience, there is no shortage of Zionist shills to assure them that the murder of children for such a worthy cause is wholly justified. Peter Berkowitz, Senior Fellow at the shady Hoover Institution, recently has been spreading the long-discredited canard again that Palestinian children are raised from the cradle to support Islamic Extremism. Berkowitz, himself a graduate of Yeshiva University in Jerusalem, cites as a source for these stories an organization called IMPACT-se, an NGO connected to the Israeli Government. In case these Churchians are thinking of bringing along their children to repopulate Gaza, they should be aware that under the Zionist educational system, Christians are not exactly treated with a great deal of respect; in fact, much like the Liberal American schools that Berkowitz censures, Israeli schools foment considerable anti-Christian bigotry. They also might want to be aware that the Zionists are huge supporters of Radical Feminism---to the point where girls are not only required to register for the Draft, they are mandated to serve in the IDF, including being forced to serve in combat positions. 

    These Churchians too should be aware that under the Zionist Regime, Property Rights are almost nonexistent. Not only can the State kick down one's door at any time for any reason, all property in Israel is subject to strict State regulation, which in practice amounts to more of a lease (or a license) from the Regime instead of ownership as we understand it in the US.

   Ignoring facts like these is one of the most incomprehensible conundrums about attitudes on the so-called Christian Right about the Zionist Regime. Not only do they collectively wink at murdering children and persecuting Christians, they wholeheartedly parrot the Mainstream Media talking-point that Israel is a Right-Wing country. The Zionists are hardcore Left or nobody ever was. The Government of Israel is further to the Left on most fundamental issues than any American State and even most countries in Europe.

   In fact, despite what both the Liberal and Conservative American media outlets say, it's the Conservative Orthodox Jews who've been the most critical of Zionism. Many Orthodox Jews were persecuted, along with Christians, during Netanyahu's oppressive Scamdemic crackdowns. Besides being praised by the World Economic Forum for literal tree-hugging during the Scamdemic, Israel's tyrannical policies not only drew praise from the WEF, but Netanyahu himself contributed to the WEF's policies on contact tracing and other surveillance schemes. The WEF has never condemned the Zionist atrocities in Gaza and in fact recently again praised the Regime for its commitment to so-called Green Technologies and consider it an integral component of the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution. 

   It's hard to say at this point how much of the Right's slavish support of the Deep State's Middle East Policy comes from genuine deception and how much of it is hypocritical, cynical opportunism. At a certain point, the facts become so glaringly evident that no amount of sophistry or fake theology can hide it. If the so-called Religious Right in the West has degenerated to such a point where killing children and persecuting Christians in the name of the Great Reset is something they can condone, then there really is no hope for them.

    

THE SPIRIT OF INTOLERANCE

     Recently, I've criticized Dennis Prager a lot, but over the holidays he wrote an article which caused the Whacko Left a collective meltdown. He also wrote a sequel which seems to have had roughly the same effect. As we saw during four years of runaway Trump Derangement Syndrome, Leftist outrage is usually a weather-vane of truth---especially when the Left is forced to see themselves for what they really are. 

    Prager's articles basically tell some anecdotes of families broken during the holidays by intolerant ideologies. The Postmodern American Left is distinguished historically by its utter refusal to listen to facts or even contrary opinions. This is especially true of the Millennial and Zoomer generations. 

     The stories that Prager relates are truly sad; the callous behavior of the Liberals that he describes is fairly typical. Liberalism simply is what is for these people; and though few of them can give any other reason for supporting their doctrines than "everybody says so" they'll behave with the abandon of the worst religious fanatics defending what they themselves don't understand. The truly frightening thing is that if they're willing to throw aside their own families over ideological purity, God only knows what they'd do to the rest of us.

   Conservatives admittedly haven't been the best role models, as their recent treatment of immigrants and tolerance of Red Pill stupidity illustrates. And as I pointed out in the comments, well, this:

      Regardless of who or what is to blame, however, we are faced with a serious problem here. We are seeing a general trend in our society which evinces a deeply unsettling disregard for human life or even basic civilized behavioral norms. We saw this come out in drastic relief during the excesses of the Scamdemic as well as the insanity that came in the wake of the Roe v. Wade ruling. Unfortunately, we as a society learned nothing from any of this. 

     Besides considerable agitprop from vested interests, what is driving this rage and hatred is reductio ad absurdum of the social heresy that the personal is political combined with a heavy admixture of socially encouraged Narcissism and Paranoia. If anyone thinks that this will lead to anything positive, they simply need to observe the current conditions in authoritarian hells like Canada or the Netherlands because that will be our future and it doesn't matter materially whether the jackboot is on the Left or Right foot. 

    Whatever wishful thinking Americans might want to engage in to the contrary, we today are closer to seeing institutions like Auschwitz on our own soil than we'd like to admit. We already have them, in fact: institutions like the ADX prisons and Guantanamo (for now) are places where the horrors rival those of the Bastille or Andersonville; and we've also seen brutal abuses in the 'public-private' prisons in several states. Americans look the other way because (for now) such crimes happen to criminals and terrorists. It's but a simple matter to 'redefine' dissent as criminal behavior to bring the Concentration Camps here. I think that we all see---given our culture's tolerance of dissent---how close this possibility actually is to realization. 

    As if we needed any further proof, consider that a poll taken five years ago (the most recent on the subject available) showed that 3 out of 5 Americans have no reservations about the use of torture; and that includes 7 in 10 who identify as Conservative and nearly half of those who identify as Liberal.

    In his articles, Prager missed the bigger picture, but the snapshot he provided should tell us all that we are headed for a major social disaster if these attitudes continue to prevail. This is why I make it an especial point of calling it out on the political Right, because our side should know better and try to be better. 
     

PSEUDOSKEPTICISM

    Many readers probably wouldn't guess the personal anecdote that I'm about to share: but, believe it or not, I was actually born in farming country and spent most of my early childhood on/around farms. I actually saw phenomena like we hear described today in certain media dedicated to the 'paranormal': crop circles, mutilated cattle, footprints and signs of various supposed cryptids---and other quite a few unexplainable events. 

    These types of events always generated a lot of local controversy, and occasionally made the local TV news. It never quite got to the point where military units suddenly started showing up, but Forest Rangers and the USDA Extension Office were interviewed and the officials usually ended up shrugging their shoulders and flatly stated that they didn't have an explanation (We had a lot more truthful government back then). The TV Stations would always then interview the obligatory 'skeptic'---usually at some academic institution. I think that we all know the type: the smug smile, the condescending attitude, the beady eyes. It always seemed as though no matter how these people were filmed, they were always looking (literally) down their noses at the reporters. In case anyone is wondering, they mostly attributed such events to 'lightning' no matter how absurd such an explanation really was.

    Since the advent of the Internet, these types have proliferated: in fact, they've even expanded into a new sub-category known as fact-checkers. However much they boast of their 'objectivity' and 'critical thinking', there are two things that most Skeptics never doubt:

    1. Their own intellectual superiority to the rest of mankind; and 

    2. The so-called 'Scientific Consensus' regardless of how many other scientists dissent from the official narrative. 

    It's gotten so bad that even Rationalwiki has a whole section devoted to it. The article's worth a read despite the irony of it coming from a source that doesn't always follow some of the principles that the article itself advocates. 

  "The correct, though less common, use of the term "pseudoskepticism" refers to those who declare themselves merely "skeptical" of a concept, but in reality would not be convinced by any evidence...This essentially is cloaked Denialism as there is a vast amount of real evidence which these pseudoskeptics wilfully ignore. Saying 'I am skeptical of X' seems more reasonable than saying 'I don't accept X and never will regardless of the evidence', even if the latter is more accurate.

  "Real skeptics are always prepared to change their positions based on new evidence, consistent with the scientific method. An example is Einstein's Cosmological Constant, which has gone through a number of revisions as to whether it applies or not---thus making skeptics who changed their mind on that issue when the scientific consensus changed, prima facie real skeptics. Clearly, if people change their mind on a topic, that is a positive defense against an accusation that they will not change their mind on that topic."

   This definition is basically correct, but what it doesn't take into account is the corruption of scientific consensus which is rife in our times. The author seems to believe that the same criteria for a 'scientific consensus' that existed in Einstein's era exists in ours. Albert Einstein lived in a time when some of the greatest scientists were intellectual entrepreneurs, so to speak, and weren't even products of the university system. Comparing the Scientific Consensus of today with what existed in the 19th Century is like those Economists who compare our postmodern Corporate Oligarchs to the industrial and financial leaders of that period who started out as coal-stokers and bank clerks and ended up millionaire owners of steel plants and large banks. We don't live in a Meritocracy any longer, and the scientific field is no exception. 

   

     Since the end of the Second World War, scientific research increasingly has been tied to funding---primarily from the Government and today even more heavily upon Corporations and the front-groups they set up for such 'charitable' purposes. In the beginning this system had a legitimate purpose. As taxpayer-funded institutions, the Government often turned to the universities for their expertise in developing military technology, space-exploration, alternative energy systems, computing technology, etc. Private Corporations typically had their own Research and Development Divisions, but would occasionally hire university professors as consultants. 

   However, as time went on, politicians learned that they could tie funding for research to produce outcomes favorable to themselves or the Vested Interests whom they represented. Likewise, following the principles of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Corporatists found that they could eliminate R & D Departments and increase profits to their stakeholders by dropping hefty tax-deductible financial gifts upon Academia and get their work done at a much lower cost---sort of a backdoor subsidization program where Big Business can gouge both taxpayer and consumer. As one anonymous writer explained: 

   Rigged science refers to the process of hindering free exploration by setting expected goals for monetary gains and survival of scientists, hiring opportunistic individuals, omitting data, avoiding the bigger picture that would contradict or put in perspective the rigged outcome.The scientific spirit, which is based on the willingness to put hypotheses to the test and let them be falsified is perverted by subjecting 'heretics' to character assassination and psychological warfare often supported by the commercially-controlled media and {the threat of} cut off funds. Also, increasingly, hypotheses are formulated in such a way, that they can not by falsified, i.e. in medicine and climate research. From a scientific POV these are ideologies rather than hypotheses."

   In contrast, consider the rather inquisitorial spirit promoted by pediatrician Peter Hotez and published in the respected journal, The Scientific American. Hotez, it should be noted, received a doctorate from Rockefeller University and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences---both of which have varying connections to such wholly disinterested and objective organizations as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Carlos Slim Foundation, and the never-Trump Koch Family Foundation. Scientific American is owned by media conglomerate Springer Publications (of whom we'll have more to say below):

    “Antiscience has emerged as a dominant and highly lethal force, and one that threatens global security, as much as do terrorism and nuclear proliferation. We must mount a counteroffensive and build new infrastructure to combat antiscience, just as we have for these other more widely recognized and established threats... Antiscience is the rejection of mainstream scientific views and methods or their replacement with unproven or deliberately misleading theories, often for nefarious and political gains. It targets prominent scientists and attempts to discredit them.

   "Containing antiscience will require work and an interdisciplinary approach. For innovative and comprehensive solutions, we might look at interagency task forces in the U.S. government or among the agencies of the United Nations...We must be prepared to implement a sophisticated infrastructure to counteract this, similar to what we have already done for more established global threats. Antiscience is now a large and formidable security issue."

    Let us all hope this is willingness to put hypotheses to the test and let them be falsified enough!

    The corollary to corruption in research stems also from the fact that this funding is largely based upon a given scientist's academic reputation---as reflected in his publications in peer-reviewed journals. Again, peer-review once served a useful purpose. It was a sort of self-policing mechanism---ironically in today's context---to keep vested interests and fake theories out of Academia. Peer-Review publishing today has become slightly more than a pay-to-play scheme and most of these publications have been subject to the same kind of industry hijacking that Federal and State Regulatory Agencies have.

   Three major media combines own half of the peer-reviewed journals: Wiley-Blackwell, Elsevier, and Springer Publishing. Wiley-Blackwell owns about 12% of these journals, but has a near-monopoly on textbook and encyclopedia publishing. Headquartered in New York, their CEO is Brian Napack, a former executive at Disney who headed Disney Educational Productions. In 2020, Napack gave a very Great Reset-friendly interview with the magazine EdTech, where he boasted of Wiley-Blackwell that "about half of the world's research flows through our platforms."

   Napack went on to describe a new innovative technology called MThree, which he bragged that Wiley-Blackwell would implement throughout Academia: "a truly innovative business that works with some of the most well-known corporations around the world to help them literally build the labor force talent they need to compete and win. We do this by working with client companies to identify their specific talent needs – say 100 mobile developers for a development shop in Toronto. Then, mthree directly recruits, trains and places talent directly into jobs fully prepared with the exact, company-specific skills that they need to succeed." And naturally Wiley-Blackwell is quite 'woke:'

  "In recent months, like many companies and organizations, we’ve been doing a lot of deep thinking on the topics of inequity and injustice. The evidence of systemic racism is undeniable and continues to mount every day. At Wiley, we’ve been discussing not only what we should do to respond to the moment, but also how we can use this moment and our collective outrage to drive long-overdue action.

  "We start with values that include a grounding belief that acts against any of us hurt all of us, and that acts that lift each of us up, lift all of us up...We are evaluating how we operate as a company and how we work with our communities of students, researchers, authors, and partners. And we are putting together action plans to ensure that our company and our community are informed and driven to enact positive, lasting change. At Wiley, we know that inequity and injustice is not someone else’s problem. It is our problem. We intend to be part of the solution, within our walls, in our industry, in our communities, and in society at large."

   Does any of that sound objective? What do you suppose the odds of a scientific research paper disputing whether "corporations around the world building the labor force talent they need to compete and win" is a desirable economic or psychosocial goal gets published by Wiley-Blackwell?

      Elsevier is based in Holland and has a cozy relationship with Great Reset tyrant, Dutch PM Mark Rutte. Currently, Elsevier controls about a quarter of all scientific peer-reviewed journals. The company is a subsidiary of British Media octopus, RELX Plc. RELX states that Elsevier "publishes 420,000 articles a year in about 2,500 journals." As a specimen of their scientific detachment and objectivity, RELX also describes this division as: "RELX's Scientific, Technical & Medical business provides information, analytics and tools that help investors make decisions that improve scientific and healthcare outcomes. It operates under the name of Elsevier." The top shareholder of RELX is WEF/Great Reset linchpin BlackRock, which owns about 9% of the company. We're assured however that none of this impugns on Elsevier's scientific credibility in the slightest. 

     Springer is a subsidiary of German Media giant, the Holtzbrinck Publishing Group---which though little known in the US is one of the top five English-language publishers in the world since its acquisition of Macmillan. It also owns Holt, Tor, St. Martins, among many others. Holtzbrinck was founded in 1948 by a former publisher of the Nazi Ministry of Propaganda. 

   In 2015, Holtzbrinck purchased Springer with the help of corporate raider international investment firm BC Partners. BC has slightly more than a passing interest in Big Tech and Big Pharma, as may be seen from their list of major holdings. And while we're on the subject of Nazis, BC's CEO is one Stephan Cretier, also CEO of Canada's GardaWorld, "one of the world's largest private security providers." Well, we can all surmise what role that such a company has played in Canada recently. 

   It seems that maybe some of these Skeptics would be doing a little more good by worrying less about circles in cornfields and worrying more about who's pulling the strings on what they call settled science. If there really is a growing 'anti-science' sentiment in America, you're reading here what is really causing it: the fact that most science today is corrupt, unreliable, agenda-driven and could change tomorrow with a bigger payoff. Then, there's this growing tendency of science-supporters to meet criticism---not by counter-proofs, but with a police jackboot on the necks of their critics. This is an atmosphere which makes it incredibly easy for jugheads like Vox Day, Owen Benjamin, and Rollo Tomassi to spread some of the most ludicrous pseudoscience as a 'counter-narrative.' And why not? The 'official narrative' tells us absurdities about homo 'equality', man-made climate change, gender without biological or psychological origins, and many others during the so-called 'Pandemic.' 

   This is the situation that naturally arises when Science is a matter of 'controlling the narrative' and 'achieving consensus.' The next step, as is increasingly being made clear by various academics, is for Scientific Consensus to become Dogma. Remember from our own history when people who denied the 'settled science' that the earth was stationary paid for it with the Rack, Strappado, and the Stake. As recently as the 1860s in our own country, challenging the 'settled science' of racial inequality in the Confederacy was punishable by hanging. Don't imagine for one minute that it happen again. Then, as now, science was perverted to serve vested interests and the quest for truth and enlightenment has never been especially high on the list of these interests' priorities. 

    

    

   

  

SYNTHETIC CHILDBIRTH

    There are probably a few who wonder why we write articles on and link to sites where issues like gender and relationships get discussed. With the Anglosphere firmly in the grasp of Jacobin psychopaths one might reasonably question why such things still matter. The answer is very simple: it's been neglect of these issues that set us up for where we've found ourselves. Essentially, the men of Anglosphere countries immolated themselves; hence it should be no surprise that an effete and sterile Technocracy would rise in our midst as leaders proclaiming a New Order. 

    When the Junta seized power last January and announced its commitment to the Great Reset, I predicted then (and still believe) that it will ultimately fail. The reason for this is because too many peoples outside of the U.S. still believe in the family as the basis for society. Even the Communists gave up on schemes to change traditional gender roles a long time ago. In Europe, where the population hasn't been completely cowed like we have, the Great Reset crowd is having some real problems. The Czech Republic recently voted out its pro-Reset government; Denmark is on the verge of doing the same. The Netherlands is teetering on the edge of outright Civil War and Bulgaria came very close to that actually happening last week. It has been widely reported that parts of Austria, Greece, Romania, Italy, and France are unable to enforce Scamdemic restrictions because of local resistance. Even the rats at Davos had to postpone the WEF's annual meeting this month because of unrest in Switzerland. There are even signs that the Regime's hold over Britain may be cracking.

     Here on this side of the Atlantic, some Tech Oligarchs caused a controversy this week by suggesting that artificial wombs would be a worthwhile technology for society to invest in. Sahil Lavingia, of the E-Commerce site Gumroad, made the suggestion which was supported by Vitalek Buterin who heads the Ethereum Corporation, a software company deeply interested in Cryptocurrency. "Disparities in economic success between men and women are far larger once marriage + children enter the picture. Synthetic wombs would remove the high burden of pregnancy, significantly reducing the inequality." Buterin opined.

Actually, just looking at a photo of these two worthies really tells us all that we need to know about why they would be in favor of such an idea.

   About what we'd expect: a pair of anemic, low-T perpetual Incels who think that sex, love, and family interfere too much with efficient economic productivity. It's also no surprise that the top-level banksters and Tech Lords at the World Economic Forum use the products of these two companies heavily since they essentially share the same ideology. Klaus Schwab has been a grand proponent of transhumanism and replacing the subhumans workers with machines since The Fourth Reich Industrial Revolution was published; and only a few years ago set 2025 as a goal for automatons to perform most of human labor.

On social media sites, the reviews were mixed with a few Feminist nitwits applauding the idea. This was rather ironic because the Red Pill cultists were the first ones who really began pushing Artificial Wombs about a decade ago. Manosphere sites during the 2010s were loaded with fantasies about transhumanist futures where women would be replaced with realistic sexbots and instilled with artificial wombs. If anyone is inclined to laugh these ideas off as fantasy, consider how these infernal devices have advanced during the last century. They've already begun to integrate them with Artificial Intelligence and the cost is roughly the same as a medium-priced new car. Add to this that mad scientists are also nearly on the verge of fully-functional womb transplants for transgendered males. The Red Pill cultists are still cheering on all of these developments. This is yet another example of why cults are dangerous. Despite what Lavingia and Buterin say, it's obvious that what the Red Pills say is actually true: that so far from empowering women, translating their sexual and maternal functions to machines effectively eliminates any need for them at all.

This idea isn't going to go away; in fact the Media Moguls have planned to release a feature film this year called The Pod Generation in which a married couple (inter-racial of course) where artificial wombs are a central plot theme. The film is slated to start production in March; which means that Elites are starting to disseminate the concept already through propaganda. Will Americans really accept this as the New Normal in the not-so-distant future? Of course. If recent history is any indication, Ameroboobs will swallow just about anything provided that what they're hearing isn't the truth.

An editorialist named Brendan Heard actually summed up the situation best: "Just how far science in the West today is willing to go to facilitate the whims of gender theory enthusiasts currently seems boundless. If they can frame their argument as an end to some form of ‘oppression,’ then billions will be spent investing in it. Already they are willing to ‘change the gender’ of children too young to understand what that means, so if you think they will show the slightest hesitation ‘for the sake of the children,’ you are mistaken. Nothing will stand in the way of explorative science, in order to give our spoiled post-gen-x generations something that nature has denied them." 

   All of which is 100% true. None of this has anything whatsoever to do with making child-rearing easier. If it were, these tech oligarchs would propose a sensible social program like Vladimir Putin initiated in Russia a few years ago. Putin extended the social safety net for single mothers to all stay-at-home mothers---and Russia's declining birthrate has reversed. The numbers of divorces and abortions in Russia have radically declined. Instead, what the Western Elites are doing is pandering to our modern aversion towards responsibility; as well as pandering to selfishness and egocentricity. It's totally in keeping with our cultural attitudes towards everything. One can go to a factory, custom-build a partner and pretend it's love. Then create kids in a synthetic womb, dump it in a public school and pretend it's parenting. In a synthetic society we can make synthetic people: we already live in a culture where surgery can change your gender, drugs can change your moods, history can be revised, facts and reality can be whatever you want them to be. 

   This isn't progress, however much the paid propagandists and mad scientists say it is; because Nature is always going to take its course. In primitive times, science tried to defeat Nature. It was believed that certain spells and formulas could change the forces of Nature. Our greatest scientific achievements came when Man realized that by working with Nature, he could use its power to his advantage. Nobody ever flew because they wished it; but by learning the Laws of Gravity and Relativity, they can land astronauts on the Moon and bring them home again. 

   It's the same way with relationships. Accepting that men are one way and women are another and that both are needed to create and sustain life makes a happier and more stable society that fantasizing and wishing ever could. This is why learning how to be men and women is actually still important. Those grounded in Reality are the ones who will survive. If anyone is inclined to disbelieve this just consider that about a half-dozen Atomic bombs could take out America's power grid, and with it satellite communications; and so in less than one hour all of your AI-driven sexbots and artificial wombs will cease functioning. Those with a self-preservation instinct, who've learned to care for and to depend upon others will get through a disaster like that. And the way many of these same nutjobs have been spouting off about Atomic War lately, don't assume for an instant that it can't happen. Whatever happens, we will need strong men and women to rebuild the future.

    

    

IS NATO BEING SET UP TO FAIL?

       The situation in Europe right now is becoming increasingly desperate. A few years ago, Soros-backed interests bribed leaders of the European Union to take in more refugees from Africa and Asia than those countries could reasonably care for. Then came the Scamdemic which economically crippled the region. The presidents of several EU countries responded with brutal and inhumane "emergency measures" which have only intensified. The populations of the Netherlands, Austria, Denmark, and Greece are on the verge of open revolt, which---if that were to happen---would likely spill over into France, Spain, and Italy where the NWO despots are thoroughly hated. Rigged elections in Norway and Germany have led to the installation of de facto permanent Leftist regimes. 

     Toward the end of this year, NATO countries---mostly the US, Canada, and Britain have been doing their best to push Europe into armed conflict with Russia. There's even considerable reckless talk from Western politicians and pundits about Atomic weapons being deployed. Germany and several other countries have suspended gas purchases from Russia and purchased more American and Canadian shipments despite the higher cost to their already burdened populations. 

    The current crisis has come about because of continual lying from Western Oligarchies which promised not to expand NATO eastward. As can be seen from the map, the promises have been routinely broken. A turning point came late in Obama's term when a Color Revolution in Ukraine split the country. Crimea was annexed to Russia and the Russians have been giving aid to the Freedom Fighters who've established a breakaway region in East Ukraine. The Elites have attempted two Color Revolutions in Belarus which have failed. The NWO Regime is pushing NATO to expand to include Sweden, Finland, and West Ukraine, which would give the NATO Bloc an almost solid militarized line on the Western Russian Border. 

   The Russian Government has drawn a sharp line in the sand concerning these proposals; and we shouldn't forget that they are not adverse to backing up their demands. In 2007 they drove Bush's and Soros' henchmen out of Georgia; they humiliated Obama in Syria---and then a year later foiled the Oligarchs' hegemonic plans in Ukraine. Ukraine is an especially dangerous position right now. The Revolutionaries who took over that country are complete maniacs who believe that Crimea and East Ukraine should be taken back by force. They actually believe that Ukraine will emerge as a superpower if WW3 breaks out. It's obvious that these people are mentally unstable and could easily plunge Europe into the kinds of bloodbaths that spread across the continent during the first half of the 20th Century. 

    It should be obvious that NATO is not going to win a ground war in Europe against the Russian Army. The Governments and populations of several countries are more pro-Russian than they are pro-NATO. Most NATO member states in Europe have antagonized their populations to the point where they will get little support---plus they are teeming with refugees who can't be relied upon. Public support for another World War in Europe is miniscule to say the least. So why is this happening? 

  The answer probably lies in an event mostly ignored by the Western MSM. Shortly after the Junta's sudden surrender withdrawal from Afghanistan, Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Austin, and an assortment of other top-level goons met in London with the British Royal Family and the thugs running Australia to agree to a new defense treaty known as AUKUS. This meeting was characterized by Australia scrapping a submarine deal with France in favor of American hardware---as well as some colorful statements by Nancy Pelosi expounding enthusiastically upon the theories of Klaus Schwab, AUKUS should have sent a signal to NATO and the EU that the New World Order doesn't really much room in it for Europe. A war and a massive NATO defeat would bankrupt Europe and throw the continent into chaos---it would also eliminate a lot of competition for British and North American interests. And it would create another 'State of Emergency' here at home; while draining Russia---the NWO's other enemy---of resources. 

    It's also quite noteworthy that a number of European firms in the WEF are headquartered in Switzerland---which is not a NATO member. These Corporations who now run the governments of the English-speaking world like efficiency. A union of the English-speaking world is far more efficient than trying to support cross-cultural economies, and continental Europe is a good start for their depopulation schemes. True, Switzerland is not an English-speaking country, but it's a natural fortress from which the Elites can manage their colonies easily. AUKUS is the new 'Big Three' with other smaller satellites like Canada, New Zealand, and Israel begging for a slice of the confederation.

   In short, NATO and the European Union in general have become expendable. The US, Canada, and Britain are NATO members willing to sacrifice the organization to build a new union excluding the others. At this point, even if NATO backs down to Russia, the Elites can use the excuse of 'NATO weakness' to lobby for its dissolution. 

   

   Hopefully, the people of Europe see that they are not only being used for the gain of foreign interests; they are considered by these Corporate interests to be only another unprofitable subsidiary (like Afghanistan) and discarded. Here in the United States, we let them get away with this during the 1990s when we watched American workers sacrificed for outsourcing; this trend has grown into sacrificing entire countries as Economic Imperialism expanded. Now they're on to discarding whole economic zones in their quest for world power. French President Emmanuel Macron, whose government was shafted hardest by the AUKUS Treaty saw the handwriting on the wall before the Scamdemic started. "I urge Europe to start thinking of itself as a geopolitical power to ensure it remains in control of its destiny...The alliance only works if the guarantor of last resort functions as such. I'd argue that we should reassess the reality of what Nato is in the light of the commitment of the United States". Macron has been under pressure to pull out of NATO largely because of the continued contempt shown French interests led by Anglosphere nations. France, however, is deeply divided country on political issues and its position as a global power has been marginalized for years. Whether France can lead a pushback against AUKUS/NWO imperialism is debatable though there appears to be a growing plurality of Frenchmen supportive of doing so. 

   Europe is basically suffering from the same problem that Anglo-American Conservatives have. For the last several years, the Cultural Marxist Long March has continued unabated because Conservatives here and politicians abroad have chosen to look the other way and to go along to get along for the sake of temporary economic or political advantage. Then one day, they've begun to notice that their enemies are holding all the cards and are about ready to cash in the chips. 

    

     

   

CHRISTMAS AT HOME AND ABROAD IN 2021

     While the Mainstream Media is busily instilling in Americans a Yuletide spirit of the cheerless gloom that their Masters behind the Great Reset hope to make the New Normal, we've managed now to make it to a second Christmas since the Putsch. Most Americans have already forgotten the spectacular Christmas pageants held at the White House during the last Administration's term, even though it was less than five years ago. 

     But Americans preferred going back to their lives of drug-fueled drama, mass-hysteria, and internacine hatred and so, the first Christmas of the New Order is marked by relatives turning away family over the Loyalty Vaxx, artificial price inflation, and fake shortages and incessant scoldings from the Intelligentsia. The Junta kicked off the celebration of the most famous Birth in history by approving over-the-counter abortion pills. They've been celebrating the Advent of the Prince of Peace by threatening atomic war. Meanwhile both the nominal Head-of-State and his surrogates have been encouraging further division and segregation based on one's loyalty to the State; and the Pentagon is advocating turning its weaponry on American Nationals. Millions of Americans are facing job loss as the purges begin ramping up. The cities of Chicago, New York, and Washington announced this week even more repressive curfews and home detentions. 

    Not to be outdone, the rest of the Anglosphere and their satraps in the EU have been accelerating their repressive measures. Despite things like bringing back Secret Police Forces to enforce mass-segregation of the Disloyal and unleashing brutal suppression of protests, the EU has sent their official Goodwill Ambassador Riccardo Simonetti to promote the new spirit of the Christmas Season.

    Which is why I say that we who live in so-called 'Western Democracies' should make the most of this year's Christmas Festivities, because at this rate we're unlikely to have too many more future opportunities to do so. 

    Meanwhile, though, it's not all doom and gloom because some countries and cultures still respect Christmas. 

RUSSIA:

SYRIA:

CHINA:

IRAN:

   But let's not forget, we are the 'Exceptional Ones.' 

     Spite all of these jerks: have a mask-free, friendly, and fun celebration with a good dinner and lots of presents and decorations. Christmas stands for Peace and Joy and everything else the Elites hate. 

WHITE GUILT GOES MAINSTREAM

    Across the Atlantic, the Dutch Republic has been undergoing some political turmoil. Their arrogant Prime Minister Mark Rutte has been forced out of office over a corruption scandal, so in retaliation he's used the Scam-demic to impose the first nationwide curfew since the country was occupied by the Nazis in the 1940s. This has led to riots and today the Dutch Supreme Court (which is also the Hague) ruled that curfew was unconstitutional. Coming from the World Court, this was a particular sting to Rutte, who is also a person of standing at the United Nations in his spare time. Judge Gert Smelt said: 

     "A special act, the Extraordinary Powers of Civil Authority Act has been used to introduce the curfew. This act offers the cabinet the option of imposing a curfew in very urgent and exceptional circumstances, without first having to go through a legislative process - involving the Senate and the House of Representatives in advance...The Act was to be implemented for a situation for which the law is intended, as is the case, for example, with a dike breach. Therefore, the use of this law to impose curfew is not legitimate. The curfew is a far-reaching violation of the right to freedom of movement and privacy and (indirectly) limits, among other things, the right to freedom of assembly and demonstration...Therefore it is ruled that the curfew be lifted immediately."

    This is how Dutchmen deal with these Great Reset freaks: by not allowing themselves to get pushed around. Here in the Prozac Nation however, where soft living, pill-popping, and passive-aggressiveness defines the American male, it's a different story. Vlogger Davey Crocko, for example, led his podcast today with a revolting story of a government thug celebrating after closing down a Los Angeles brewery. That of course won't lead to riots or governments resigning here. We're Exceptional Americans, after all. 

    As if we needed any further proof of how far we've degenerated as a society, the news also came out today that Manhattan educrat Mark Federman is at it again. Some might recall that Federman is the same whacko who in 2007 ended up in jail for fighting with police officers who'd responded to an assault call at his school. But Federman has the proper politically-correct attitude for a modern school administrator, and neither lost his job over that incident, nor was he disciplined in any way. 

    So in 2021, he's back in the news, this time for issuing an encyclical to parents and students to "reflect on their whiteness"---whatever that means. He included a diagram composed by some other academic nitwit. This is what it all looks like:

   The explanation for this ridiculous diagram starts by stating that "there is a regime of whiteness," which is already a falsehood. Apparently it's been already forgotten that we recently had a Black president. For the record, we also have a Black Justice on the US Supreme Court; three Black U.S. Senators, 57 Black Congressmen; and 34 Black mayors of major cities. And did you know that 8% of American millionaires are Black? It doesn't sound too much like any kind of White Regime to me. 

  The main problem with this diagram and the explanations which follow is that it is all simply assertions. It's nothing but psychobabble, but since its purpose is to appeal to demoralized and degenerated White people who already hate themselves, nobody pushing it really need fear rational analysis. There are eight levels of 'white identity' according to these brilliant scholars, whom bye-the-way, can't offer a shred of proof for any of this.

      What this chart describes sounds more like South Africa circa 1955 than anything happening in the United States today. Honestly, I've read through this screed a half dozen times and still have no idea what this writer is talking about. The one point that is actually troubling is the Eighth; which presumably Federman and his gang believes is the optimal level for White Americans to strive. It sounds ominously like coded language for genocide. At the very least, he's arguing for racial suicide at a voluntary level. 

     Real Racism---which is what this document advocates if we take it literally---is a social atavism. It has its actual origins in the superstitions of (some) primitive peoples who associated different skin, hair, or eye colors with the marks of evil spirits, etc. It obviously functions on an extremely low level of social development. In fact, what this writer says about Whites here is reminiscent of some the Japanese propaganda put out during WW2. The Japanese leaders claimed that their Emperor was a god; and that his chosen people looked like him. Hence, White people with round eyes were cursed from birth; and, of course, it was even worse to be born Black. Their German allies, for obvious reasons, had to modify their Racial theories and install a Fuhrer who was like a god. The Germans set up leaders of Academia who proclaimed that the science was settled regarding their own theories of Racial Purity. 

    The author of this document---who is a professor of Political Science at Northwestern University---is basically stating the same thing. He's actually a Racist himself, and is projecting all of the hatred that inwardly consumes him outwardly upon an entire people. This is the psychological point where all of this nonsense about 'White Guilt' originates. Subconsciously people like this are trying to wipe out their own guilt and self-hatred by projecting it on others and sacrificing them by proxy. They wrap these excuses in historical events in which some White people behaved cruelly or unjustly toward minorities, while ignoring every good thing that White people ever did or accomplished. 

    The smug Elites running the NYC School System---who are just as much a collection of nutcases as Federman and Hesse---naturally supported sending out this document. “Anti-racism and the celebration of diversity is at the core of our work on behalf of the young people of New York City, and the East Side Community School’s students, parents, and staff partner together to advance equity in their community,” a spokesman bloviated, “The document in question was shared with the school by parents as a part of ongoing anti-racist work in the school community and is one of many resources the schools utilizes.” Then, just as predictably, they played the Victim Card: “Our staff are now being targeted with vile racist, anti-Semitic, and homophobic slurs and degrading language from people outside of their school and nothing justifies the abuse directed at our educators!"

   This all brings up two further questions. The first is: why would anyone allow their offspring to be taught by jackasses like these? Absolutely no good can come out of subjecting impressionable minds to this kind of torture. If you sent your children off to live with some primitive tribe in New Guinea, they'd come out of it better educated than this. American parents really have a lot to answer for at the Bar of Civilization. 

   The second is: how did screwballs like these get into such positions in the first place? That one, too, sadly is not difficult to answer. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s decades, the Radical Left began and successfully completed a planned takeover of our schools at all levels. Conservatives in Teaching or in Administrative positions were forced out; either through early retirement or by quasi-legal and often illegal means. Newcomers were turned away from employment and blacklisted. At the University level, where future educators are trained, Admissions Departments routinely now screen for people whose social media and backgrounds represent thought patterns acceptable to the New Order. All of this came about because Conservatives did nothing whatsoever to prevent it from happening.

    A few voices like David Horowitz, Walter Williams, and Robert Bly tried in vain to warn the American Right of what was happening. It fell on deaf ears. Conservative politicians and Conservative alumni kept sending the cash to these rat's-nests. Conservative parents kept paying high taxes and inflated tuition and sending off their offspring to have their minds poisoned in these gulags. None of them were unaware of what was going on. The American Right has a lot to answer for too.

    So while Federman and his ideology disgust me personally, I can't say that I feel much sympathy for those in his School District who are objecting to his policy. You people brought this on yourselves. You've had since at least 2007 to know what kind of a man Federman is, and you turned your own kids over to him to be taught that they deserve to die for being born White. Are you satisfied with your handiwork? Were all those things that were more important than your children's education really worth it? Think about that.