Thursday, November 29, 2018


    Yesterday was a busy day for America's glamorous First Lady. The Annual Christmas Tree lighting took place that evening and she was hostess to a group viewing her amazing decorations at the White House. But earlier in day, she traveled to Lynchburg, Virginia to give a speech at Liberty University on the Opioid Epidemic. 

    Because the Corporate Media doesn't report anything positive about the Trump Administration, few Americans realize that Mrs. Trump has also been quite active in fighting the Epidemic. In May, she started the Be Best Campaign, one of the goals of which is to establish support networks for children and families affected by the Opioid Crisis. Their especial focus is on fighting Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome---babies who are born with addictions. 

    At Liberty University, Mrs. Trump gave a stunning speech. It was noteworthy simply because it was full of heartfelt sentiments, unlike the phony soundbite scripts we were accustomed to hearing from the likes of Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama. After detailing some of the statistics on Opioid Abuse, Mrs. Trump spoke of her experiences visiting hospices and rehabilitation centers.

    "I am here speaking to you in my official capacity as First Lady, but I want you to know I am also here as a mother.  But rather than lecture you about the dangers of drug abuse as most mothers would – and should – I am going to tell you what I have learned in this past year because I believe education and learning is key to making the right decisions on your own behalf.
     "I have learned that addiction can begin with something as innocent as an injury – it could be a sports injury, or from some kind of an accident. I have spoken with families and seen many news reports that talk about young athletes or people injured in accidents who became hooked on opioids after being given a prescription for real pain. Tragically, many of those stories end with people who have later transitioned into using heroin and overdosing.  In fact, data from the Department of Health and Human Services shows that in 2016 and 2017, more than 17,000 deaths were attributed to overdosing on commonly prescribed drugs.
    "I have learned that many people who become addicted to drugs are too ashamed to ask for help. I have also learned that addiction is a disease. And like any illness, people need and deserve treatment. We must commit to removing the stigma of shame that comes with addiction and helping change public opinion so that people find evidence based treatment before it is too late...
    "I believe that as our next generation, you have the potential to not just reduce, but eliminate the statistics I mentioned earlier. I also believe you have the capacity to not think of this in terms of statistics, but to think of this as a human story and an opportunity to save lives. I believe in your unending potential to change our world for the better."
    Mrs. Trump was roundly applauded by everyone except for the few Media Hyenas in attendance. Most of the MSM ignored the speech altogether, the full text of which can be read here. I can't help but to remark here that Melania Trump is doing a lot more good for real people in real need than those slatterns running around in disgusting pink hats screaming about how much they hate men. 
   Now, if young women would like to expend their efforts actually doing something that benefits all of us: why not follow Mrs. Trump's example as she called upon American youth to do? The Be Best Campaign would be a good place start. And there are plenty of volunteer opportunities to help mothers and children in drug recovery throughout the country. That's certainly better too than getting thrown in jail for disrupting Senate Confirmation Hearings. Or better than standing for hours in the hot sun raising money for racketeers like Planned Parenthood. 
    Who knows? You might even meet your soulmate, because the real men don't hang around Feminist rallies. They're out there fighting the drug epidemic too. 

Wednesday, November 28, 2018


    Last week, John Chau---an Evangelical Christian from Vancouver, Washington---was killed while on a missionary trip to the Sentinel Islands. The Islands are in a remote area of the Bay of Bengal and populated by uncivilized savages. The territory is under Indian jurisdiction. 

     This weekend, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi dispatched an expeditionary force to the islands to chastise the natives and to recover Chau's body. Predictably the American Whacko Left denounced Modi's actions. They argue that introducing Christianity would corrupt the purity of the Island's culture.

   Here is a photo of some of the Noble Savages objecting to being photographed from a passing boat. Come to think of it, they do look remarkably similar to many Democrat constituencies here in the US. Prime Minister Modi is one of Trump's strongest foreign political allies so naturally the Left detests him too. 

   This is typical behavior for the Left, but the New-Age Alt-Right has jumped on the Christian-bashing bandwagon. One Red Pill blogger who calls himself Captain Capitalism, wrote a brief but irritating piece titled Christians Are P----s. In the deep argumentative style of Generation Snowflake, he links to this article and simply pontificates: "I hate 'Christians' like these. Their virtue-signalling is more important than their child."

     The article that Captain Capitalism cites refers to Chau's parents, who stated that they forgave their son's killers. Now, in the New Testament Christ prayed from the Cross "Father, forgive them, they don't know what they're doing." The Captain doesn't tell us whether Christ's example was also 'virtue signalling'; but like other cults, the Red Pills depend heavily upon their followers' ignorance of the Bible. 

    Captain Capitalism himself his a big follower of Dalrock, Roosh V, Vox Day, Wintery Knight, Rollo Tomassi, and Matt Forney. All of these guys subordinate Christianity to Game/PUA philosophy and discourage traditional Christianity at every opportunity. The Captain has a consulting business on the side: to look at his avatar tells us everything we need to know of his own character:

     In spite of being a consultant---for Heaven knows what---Captain Capitalism doesn't tell us anywhere what he thinks that Chau's parents should have done instead of forgiving their son's killers. If forgiving them wasn't the Christian thing to do, what was? He never says. Like the other Red Pills, he's notorious for criticizing Christians' behaviors, but never has any recommendations for a more Christ-like approach to a problem. 

     Looking through his blog posts, however, we can get an idea. The article following his post on Chau argues that carrying on adulterous relations with women is morally justified as long as the wives are 'liberals'. On November 1st, though, he posts that Christian men shouldn't date Christian women. So much for another cultist and fake Christian. 

     Pope Francis recently preached a homily on the subject of forgiveness which it wouldn't hurt the Red Pills to read. The Pope argues that holding grudges and resentment prevents us from behaving in a Christian way towards others. By forgiving the Sentinel Islanders, Chau's parents and his church are not hindered by hate and anger to make further attempts to convert the natives. As Tertullian said during a time of persecution: "The more that you mow us down, the stronger we grow." 


Saturday, November 24, 2018


     Blogger Insanitybytes had a thought-provoking article up today on a subject that's been a topic of discussion in Christian circles lately. For those following real news stories (and not the usual orgy of Trump-bashing in the MSM), the issues of love, empathy, and forgiveness is centering on two stories. 

     The first of these two involves a young missionary who was killed by savages on a remote island in the Indian Ocean. The man's name was John Chau of Vancouver, Washington who---at the age of 26---had already traveled to some of the most dangerous areas of the world to spread the Gospel. The controversy really arose around Chau's parents, who publicly stated that they forgave their son's killer. Some Red Pills in particular have been snorting that the parents' Christ-like act is a sign that Christianity is 'cucked', or weak. 

   In Chau's case, I agree with the parents. These tribesmen are uncivilized and ignorant savages who don't know any better. Those who'd side with the Red Pills would have executed Saul of Tarsus, but God had other plans. It should be noted that during the ISIS Caliphate, the martyrdom of Middle Eastern Christians and the humanitarianism of the Russian Orthodox Church has made Christianity the fastest-growing religion in Syria, Iraq, and Iran. 

    Then, just as soon as it seemed that issue was settled, this guy turns up:

   Americans once again find themselves looking into the face of an incarnate fiend who has confessed to at least 90 unsolved murders; not including two for which he was tried and acquitted and four for which he was found guilty. At least those are the ones that he can remember. 

    Samuel Little is clearly an evil man. Do we as Christians have an obligation to forgive such a man? I would argue that we do not. Let us examine this a little further.

    Only God is Absolutely Good; all other created beings fall into various states of imperfection. Let's set aside momentarily the question of Saints and Angels, and concern ourselves with our mortal term on Earth. Now, Insanitybytes spoke of some Christians who entertain an 'us vs. them' mentality. Such Christians don't see an actual difference between sin and evil. 

    Most sinners are not inherently evil people. They're people who've been deceived by evil to think and work against their own souls. Such people are converted to Christianity every day. Others, however, do die in their sins. 

   The difference between erring sinners and those possessed by evil was explained by the Prophet Elijah who told King Ahab that the monarch was doomed "because he had sold himself to work evil in the sight of God." This was also the fate of Pharaoh at the time of the Exodus. St. Thomas Aquinas expanded further on this subject by demonstrating that Love is basis of worship; but just as idolatry is a perversion of faith, so love can be distorted to a point where it becomes antithetical to holiness. In other words, the more deeply steeped in sin one becomes, love of good transforms to love of evil. This is why Hell is eternal punishment. It's not that God cannot forgive those in Hell, it's that those souls are incapable of loving God. And there does come even a point in this life, such as the case with Pharaoh and Ahab, where there is a limit to what we as Christians can do to effect repentance and conversion in some people. 

    I recall a scene from an old Dick Tracy film where Tracy was being interviewed by a reporter about an upcoming execution of the leader of a murderous sabotage ring. Tracy said, "he was like a rat gnawing down the foundation of democracy, and like a rat, had to be exterminated." Samuel Little was never any more than a man-eating tiger who hunted and killed human prey. To talk about the morality of killing such tigers is ridiculous and it is no different with a man who's lowered himself to the same level. 

    What Christians really need to cultivate today is both discernment and humility. Christians who hold the belief that since we're all sinners we should never judge anybody need a dose of the former; while those who think that everyone outside of their enclaves is irredeemably sinful need a dose of the latter. God is always willing to give sinners another chance, but they aren't helped either by enabling or exclusion. 


Thursday, November 22, 2018


     In October we ran some articles eliciting the public's help in identifying a young woman who was murdered on All Saints' Day, 1980 in Huntsville, Texas. There have been some new developments over the last month, all which bring a step closer to giving our blog's adopted sister her name back. 

     To recap briefly for new readers: this young woman was last seen alive around 6:30 PM at a truck stop just outside of Huntsville. She was asking directions, apparently having made a wrong turn in the city. The owner of a gas station saw her get out of a car about an hour earlier, and walking toward Sam Houston State University. Twelve hours later, she was found dead along Interstate 45 after being mercilessly beaten, sexually tortured, and garroted. A more detailed account is here. 

     There was no identification on the girl, her fingerprints were not file, and---somewhat tellingly (or maybe suspiciously)---no one reported her missing. This is quite unusual because the woman was well-groomed, well-nourished, in overall good health, and no narcotics or other intoxicants were found in her system. Modern DNA profiling has estimated her age between 14 1/2 to 15 1/2 years old. Sadly, after 38 years, she is still only known to us as Walker County Jane Doe, and NCIC #U312231075. 

     When the case was reopened in 2015, a woman came forward with a photograph taken at a motel in Beeville, Texas. She stated that her family was living at the motel that Summer 1980 and made friends with another girl staying there named Kathy. 

    Kathy (the girl on the left) admitted to her friend that she was a runaway from Corpus Christi. She was staying with some friends at the motel. Forensic photographers believe that Kathy and WCJD may well be the same person. And, at the time of our last update, we received several indications---some from witnesses---that WCJD was enrolled at the Rebekah Home for Girls in Corpus Christi during the late 1970's. One tip that we've received since October stated that another alumni of Rebekah Home recognized the girl and also said that her name was Kathy. Unfortunately, we haven't been able to authenticate that source. 

    However, one of our readers looked up some film footage from the period shot at Rebekah Home. These two stills were taken from the documentary Freedom's Last Call produced by Roloff Ministries sometime in 1978 or 1979:

   This was from a film clip of the Rebekah Home Girl's Choir. She bears a strong resemblance to WCJD. No one yet has told us who she is. The next two are from a VHS tape of one of Rev. Lester Roloff's sermons, positively dated to 1979. They aren't quite as clear, but the likeness is still apparent:

     This could be a remarkable coincidence, but circumstantial evidence is suggesting that it is not. The uncorroborated tip alluded to above suggested that 'Kathy's' parents were in some way connected with Rev. Roloff's church. Roloff, I believe, was of the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist congregation. Thus it's very important that members of that denomination and former students at Rebekah Home pay especial attention to this PSA. 

    One other development which has come up just within the last week is, of course, the mass-confession of serial killer Samuel Little. We don't have any information of his involvement in this case, or lack thereof, as of this writing. At any rate, the most important thing now is to identify this girl. 


Tuesday, November 20, 2018


    For the last few months now, Red-Pill Game/PUA chieftain Vox Day has been engaging in yet another envy-fueled rage: this time against Jordan Peterson. And so far his hysterical outbursts have had about negative effect on Peterson as his previous tirades against John Scalzi, Ben Shapiro, and Ethan Van Scrivener; to wit, none whatsoever. 

    Frustrated both by Peterson's success and his own complete lack thereof, Vox has self-published an attack on Peterson titled Jordanetics. It contains a preface penned by the pervert Milo Yiannopoulis and ringing endorsements from such fellow Gamers and Alt-RINOs as Rollo Tomassi, Krauser PUA, Chateau Heartiste, and Vox' newest disciple, Alex Jones. Vox is already trumpeting the tome as a 'bestseller' although it doesn't appear on any bestseller-lists of any repute; and, as always, Vox discreetly doesn't tell us what his sales figures actually are. 

   Vox calls Peterson "a danger" and actually accuses him of establishing an anti-Christian cult with fanatical followers who would do anything to serve him! As if that wasn't psychological projection enough, Vox says of Peterson:  "I would point out that he is a drug-addled, integrity-challenged depressive little bitch prone to crying in public, who is one of the last people any sane young man should look to as a role model." 

    Now that everyone's finished laughing, we should point out that about the only real danger posed by Peterson to young men is the risk of severe constipation from following his loopy diet-fads. Peterson's book on The 12 Rules of Life is a weird admixture of Machiavelli, Karl Jung, and Dr. Phil; but at least it encourages men to do a few positive things to improve their lives---which is more than Vox can claim to have done.

     Overall, I believe that Peterson's book is vastly overrated, but nothing in it does anybody any real harm either. Unlike Vox Day, Peterson has never held up men like Anders Breivik as male role models. He doesn't teach men to avoid educated women or praise the Taliban for assassinating schoolgirls. Peterson doesn't teach young men to doxx and troll-storm his opponents. Peterson doesn't give men relationship advice like "a few acid-burned faces is a small price to pay for lasting marriages and stable families." 

     Peterson doesn't create online blacklists and publicize them for fanatics to follow. He doesn't tell young men that churches are for 'cucks'; or that non-Whites are subhumans; or that men don't need women's consent for sex. Vox accuses Peterson of being a 'liar', yet teaches his own followers that controlling the 'narrative' is more important than telling the truth. 

     However flawed Peterson might be, Vox Day is not even close to his level. There is no such cult as 'Jordanetics'; but Vox' cult of the Red Pill is very real and very dangerous.


Monday, November 19, 2018


     The US Department of Justice announced last week that Marilyn Nolan, 68, the former CEO of Preferred Family Healthcare, plead guilty to Federal charges of Conspiracy, Embezzlement, and Misappropriation of Federally-Funded Charitable Monies. She will thus be joining her confederates, former high-flying lobbyist D.A. Jones and slimy operative Milton Cranford for extended terms in the Federal Pen. 

    This was a really rotten trio of swamp creatures. A more or less complete compendium of their crimes can be found here, here, and here. The scam ran the entire length of the Obama Administration and, by its own admission, the IRS can't even account for how much this crew took altogether. They do know that almost $7 million illegally went to political candidates, lobbies, and PACs. 

    To summarize for those who don't wish to wade through volumes of indictments: what Nolan, Jones, and Cranford were doing was taking Obamacare funds and private donations as a charity and then funneling the cash into political activism of every kind: all the way from fundraisers to outright bribery, according to the indictments. So why is the Corporate Media still pretending that Russian and Chinese operatives interfere in our elections while ignoring this kind of blatant domestic cheating? 

    Well, the answer to that question is found in the public records. According to the website, Open Secrets, the Democrats were by far the leading recipients of these ill-gotten gains. 

    Marilyn Nolan, the Feminist ringleader of the scheme is shown making 20 donations to Hillary Clinton; 28 to the DNC and affiliated committees; and several to Democrat politicians Claire McKasgill and Jon Tester. 

    Milton Cranford's largest recipient by far was Arkansas Democrat Mark Pryor. Conner Eldridge, former Obama-appointed US Attorney and unsuccessful Democrat Senate candidate also received substantial funds. 

   David Jones is listed on the site as one of Obama's 'bundlers' directing about $33,000 under-the-table donations to the former President in 2008. 

   This case is a perfect example of why we elected Trump and why our government needs more like him. Those three crooks behind this scheme are exactly the type of material upon which the Deep State was built and maintained. It wouldn't be surprising if there are others doing the same things---the Clinton Foundation being a likely suspect. This is why we need to stay the course, and stay behind Trump and his reforms. 

Saturday, November 17, 2018


    Adrienne had a good article up today noting both the passing of John Taylor Gatto and a commentary on the state of American education by Rush Limbaugh. Gatto was one of the last traditionalist educational philosophers active in the United States. Familiar terms to us in critiquing public education: 'dumbing down' and 'provisional self-esteem' were coined by Gatto. 

    Now the passage that she quotes from Limbaugh raises a question about the Millennial Generation and what effect this cascading downward slide of our educational system has done to it. Though the dumbing-down has been going on for awhile, it really ratcheted up during the disastrous Clinton Administration. Lesbians Hillary Clinton and Donna Shalala packed the US Department of Education with some of the most venomous radicals imaginable. Bush Junior and his RINO policies did little to change any of this; and Obama accelerated the decline even further. But back in the 90's I can recall one old grey-haired History professor who was then counting down to his retirement and future idyllic days with his young mistress. Of Academic trends he told me, "Son, it's just common sense to see where the country is headed. If you dumb down the curriculum, teach that everything is morally relative, and emphasize self-esteem without accomplishment---you'll get a batch of people who are both stupid and amoral but too arrogant and too self-righteous to realize it."

     Those words have become prophetic in many ways. 

     The sad fact is that, as Gatto pointed out, this 'self-esteem' promoted by the Academic Left is an illusion, because it's not based in self-confidence but in social validation from self-appointed 'experts'. Millennials like to imagine that they are the most independent thinkers of anyone in previous history. In reality, for the most part, they are completely helpless unless someone else is telling them what to do and how to think. 

     Limbaugh expresses concern over where this is going to lead, but he doesn't need to look much further than Pennsylvania. These Academic charlatans who wanted to remove the Ten Commandments from schools should have read the Bible a little further to the part about sowing the wind and reaping the whirlwind. Academia has bestowed upon civilization a social powderkeg just waiting for a political arsonist to show up with a torch. 

     This is because---although the Millennials are intellectually weak---their massive sense of entitlement and proclivity to irrational violence makes them ripe material for fanatics and would-be despots. Reversing this trend is not going to be easy, but it will take decisive action. Betsey DeVos is facing a tough battle rooting out the cancer, but our side is making progress. Hopefully, 'Generation Snowflake' will become nothing more than a historical curiosity while kids growing up in the Trump Era are being educated again. 

Friday, November 16, 2018


  For those who haven't followed this evolving story, it concerns a lifelong dirtbag named Samuel Little. Little is currently in prison at 78 years of age after a long career of committing nearly every conceivable crime. Little is also a drug addict who lived throughout the US, his residences alternating between local jails and bum jungles. In 2013, he was finally incarcerated permanently after DNA specimens linked him to three cold-case murders in Los Angeles. Little previously had been tried for the murder of a Florida woman, but was acquitted. 

   The case made some headlines in the news, and Little was forgotten until this week. Texas authorities extradited him for interrogation after his DNA matched a 1994 cold case murder there. To everyone's amazement, Little confessed not only to that killing, but to a string of others---spanning 13 states and 35 years. The victims whom he remembered number between 90-100---all of whom were women. While it's not unusual that thugs of his type will confess to sensational crimes, 30 cases on Little's list have been closed and none have been disqualified so far. Local news outlets are reporting---almost on an hourly basis---that decades-old murders have been solved. 

    About Little himself, there isn't much to say that wouldn't be better expressed from out of a gun barrel. But there are some observations worth noting about this and similar stories. 

    One is that these new technologies and Trump's new emphasis on cooperative law enforcement is not only breaking open these old cases; but it is becoming increasingly obvious that a significant number of these crimes against women are the handiwork of a few deranged and dysfunctional males. This goes strongly against the Feminist narrative that all men are 'potential rapists' or could turn to sadistic killers and violence on the spur of the moment. For example, California authorities learned though DNA recently that a still-unknown serial murderer was also responsible for at least 40 rapes. There is also a series of cold case murders in Ohio which are now known to have been committed by the same man. 

    Many in law enforcement over the last century or so probably suspected this was the case but lacked the means of proving it. The Feminist mythology that teaches women to fear men falls when confronted with reality. 

    The second point we should note is that Little spent most of his life living under the radar as a transient. American politicians---especially on the Liberal West Coast---idolize the 'homeless' and allow them to take over public sidewalks, parks, etc. Some cities like Seattle even require high-school students to perform 'community service'---including coming into contact with such people by 'volunteering' in soup kitchens, etc. 

    Now, granted the poor should be helped: but among this class are numerous dangerous psychopaths, addicts, and sexual perverts. We need, as a society, to stop treating these people as an entitled victim-class. The deserving poor need all the help we can give them. The rest need treatment of a different sort.

    Whether we'll learn from the Samuel Little Case or not is another matter. Liberals these days seem especially immune to both logic and to the evidence of their own senses. We have to expose their fallacies if we are to keep our streets safe from future Samuel Littles. 



   As we all know, Attorney-General Jeff Sessions recently was obliged to resign from political circumstances. However, the revamped and reformed Justice Department passed into the capable hands of his lieutenant, Matthew Whitaker, who promptly set the Steamroller in motion again. Six MSM conglomerates were the first to get flattened under the new leadership. 

    Sinclair Broadcast Group, Raycom, Tribune Media Corp, Meredith, Griffin Communications, and Dreamcatcher Broadcasting were taken before the Federal Court this week and forced to cough up an undisclosed---but reportedly quite substantial---fine for flagrant violations of Anti-Trust laws. They also agreed to a whopping seven-year probationary period, under which all six companies will be monitored closely by various Federal agencies. These six corporations own a combined total of 257 television stations in 177 federally-recognized market jurisdictions; and have a combined annual revenue of $5,850,000,000. 

    To summarize what these worthies did in layman's terms: they were sharing information regarding each others' available advertising time and the rates with which they charged various advertisers. With this type of insider information, the Media companies could charge advertisers inflated rates---knowing that their competitors couldn't offer lower ones. In other words, they were fixing prices and then price-gouging their commercial customers. Once again, the Media demonstrates what their 'Elite' character really looks like behind the mask. 

    For obvious reasons, the Corporate Media declined to put this story in the headlines. Instead, CNN filed a frivolous lawsuit against the White House after Sarah Sanders took the long-overdue step of suspending CNN's repugnant and ill-behaved correspondent, Jim Acosta. 

   Acosta is best remembered for making a complete fool of himself and, by extension, disgracing all Americans at the US-North Korea Summit. The worst thing he ever did, though, was making a disgraceful scene in front of Kazakhstan's President, Nursultan Nazarbayev. Trump had been relaying United Nations concerns over press transparency in Kazakhstan; but no doubt Acosta's rampage did little to assure Nazarbayev of the benefits of a free press. 

    And actually politicians like Nazarbayev have a point. A free press without any credibility is really no improvement over a state-controlled press. The whole purpose of having a free press is to give the public a trustworthy source of information so that we, as citizens of a republic, can evaluate political decisions and policies and act upon them. A corrupt and irresponsible press in a democracy is not only worthless, but potentially a danger to society. 

     Fortunately, technology like the Internet has come to the aid of the 1st Amendment, We can expose the Corporate Media through other channels. We do need a professional mass media, but ours is going to have to reform itself before what little is left of its credibility slips through their fingers altogether. 

Monday, November 12, 2018


    The Red Pill blogger Reality Doug has penned an article fairly typical of Manospherian interpretations of Christianity called "How Christianity Became Libtardfa." Like most writers of this stripe, he imagines that Marxism and Christianity are linked; and that real Conservatives reject both.

    Seriously. In a culture where little girls plan Satanic ritual murders and homosexual perverts freely prey on young boys, this fellow thinks that less religion is really going to help. His argument is basically a rephrasing of the Marxist dictum that religion is the opiate of the masses. Unlike the Communists, though, Reality Doug doesn't consider Christianity an obstacle to subservience to a collective. He sees it as a hindrance to men realizing their full 'Alpha' potential. 

     "White men have another conditioning going back even further. Christianity presupposes that forgiveness is real because spiritual debt is real. Christianity presupposes guilt makes us contemptible wretches. Christianity presupposes redemption is by faith, by good works, by pious suffering, by suicidal atonement in a life that should be rejected wholesale as inadequate...The Christian death cult confounds the attainment and maintenance of power with the sharing of power. Morality only touches the latter, which by definition is not universal. Free market forces above the common denominator of animals require the supremacy of property rights for producers, by superlative force. Prosperity is the fruit of skillful discrimination."

    Here we have, in all its Luciferian pride, the Red Pill/Game Philosophy spelled out. According to this thinking, Man owes nothing to God---the Alpha is a god, at least any earthly one. And the Alpha owes nothing to his fellow-men. Others are, in Red Pill parlance, chumps who deserve what they get for failing to take the Red Pill. Could the fact that this whole movement is a cult be made any clearer?

     Reality Doug is an atheist but his sentiments are found widely dispersed among the fake Christians of the Manosphere. A common theme among them is the rejection of Christ as Savior while accepting Him as Lord, or King. In this scheme of things Christ is no more than an idol: a supernatural Alpha made in the Red Pill image. 

     Naturally, Reality Doug loathes the whole concept that human dignity comes from God and not from ourselves. "The white man has dominated the globe for over 200 years." he proclaims, "That makes an indelible impression on subhumans. White men are the world’s reference. We are a standard purely by inheritance. Because we are now weak animals, we are a symbol to be co-opted and destroyed." 

     It's a singular contradiction among the Red Pills when they spout things like this. First, they tell us that Christianity is weaken the race---while admitting that we were powerful when we were more Christian. Despite the supposed superiority of the White Race, we somehow are easily being co-opted by 'subhumans.' And the reason why we are being co-opted is because of Christianity. 

     Unaware that he is running in a logical circle, Reality Doug goes on by saying the following: "As far as I know, the idea of white guilt and yellow shame as fundamentals of civilization in practice was first conceived by the YooToob video blogger 'Asymmetrical Warfare'. It is a brilliant insight. It turns out to be seminal to understanding our decline and the requisite challenge of our very existence. The masses are generally animals, and the women and non-whites among them have an axe to grind. Every time they see a white man, they are looking at the bugaboo of their inferiority proved so far back that the details don’t matter. Consider what this does for the mentally unexceptional white man, also of the masses. The white man has of late been steeped in the guilt of his forebears, his blood, his skin."

     Again, he completely misses the obvious; that is, that Civilization is civilized precisely because it rests upon cooperation, complimentarianism, and sense of duty to our fellowman. Psychologist and philosopher Alfred Adler skillfully demonstrated nearly a century ago that the kind of will to power advocated by the Red Pills is the cause of most social ills. It's the opposite of what Christ taught both in word and deed in the example of washing the disciples' feet. 

     Harry Truman famously said that "the foundation of our democracy is faith: faith in oneself, faith in our neighbor, and faith in God." What a contrast indeed to the gloomy philosophy of the Red Pills, who imagine a return to Barbarianism where the Alpha held sway by force and fraud. 

Friday, November 9, 2018


     Most of us over a certain age remember Esquire magazine as the premier journal for American men. Along with practical masculine advice, Esquire featured two-fisted, action-packed tales by the likes of Ernest Hemingway and Dashiell Hammett; sports news by the legendary Ring Lardner and artwork by Alberto Vargas. 

    But things changed at Esquire late in the effete Obama Era. At a gala soiree at the posh Le Coucou Restaurant in uptown New York City, Esquire's new editor Jay Fielding gushed to approving New York Times reporters that  "There was a period of time when Esquire had a real literary charisma, and there was a culture that responded to it... But times have changed. As we move into the era of transgender bathrooms and L.G.B.T.Q.I.A. studies, when millennials are more likely to take their cultural cues from Justin Bieber’s Instagram feed than 6,000-word profiles of Sean Penn, we are charged not just with bringing back Esquire’s glory days, but with also figuring out exactly what the Esquire man — that is, the American man — is in 2017." 

    So it shouldn't surprise anybody that, following the mass-shooting in Thousand Oaks, California, Esquire is jumping on the Gun Control bandwagon. An article penned yesterday by one Jack Holmes proclaims hysterically that "a world where one cannot leave his home unarmed  for fear of being shot is not a free world!" Actually, things like the 2nd Amendment prevent American communities from ending up like this. 

    The whole article is nothing really but the typical anti-gun talking points which have been debunked repeatedly. The real disgrace is that Esquire has degenerated to the level where self-defense is considered oh so passe. And even worse than that: a magazine purportedly for men's issues is ignoring the real cause of these acts of mass-violence. That cause is a deeply misandryist culture which is failing men radically. 

    The NPC Left will sneer at that claim, but it's simple common sense. If access to guns causes all of these shootings, why are they overwhelmingly committed by men? Women can get guns just as easily as we can. Why aren't women shooting up public places? The answer is that women are not being alienated nor marginalized in our culture. The epidemic of mass-murders are part of a social continuum. 

    As evidence of this, let's note a few other statistics. The 'LGBTetc' lobby which Fielding referenced above is an example. The Elites tell us that gender is an artificial social construct; yet 99.8% of so-called 'Gender Identity Disorder' cases are men. Men also have a suicide rate that is the leading cause of male deaths in some demographics. Alcoholism, drug addiction, and fatal accidents are also highest among men. 

    In the case of the Thousand Oaks shooter, he appears to have been a veteran with untreated shell-shock. By the way, he's not the first mass shooter who was mentally ill and untreated either. But it's not simply a case of mental illness. Marginalizing men has led to male radicalization. Men who are denied legitimacy in civilized society turn to violent sects like the Red Pills, Incels, Wahhabis, Antifa, Black Lives Matter, or violent gangs like MS-13. 

    Men are born with a fear of insignificance. The anti-male Cultural Elites denigrate masculinity---mostly because they themselves are insignificant males who are neurotically driven to 'deconstruct' true masculinity in order to escape their own fear of insignificance. Nature is never cheated. No little boy ever really dreams of becoming the next Colin Kaepernick, David Hogg, or Bruce Jenner. They are instinctively drawn to heroes, because they can sense strength tempered by goodness. 

    Our culture is going to keep experiencing these violent outbreaks so long as it continues to ignore reality. They can take away the guns but they can't change human nature. Civilization elevates our human nature. Take that away and the worst elements of human nature rises to the surface. 


Wednesday, November 7, 2018


     Now that the smoke (and smokescreens) have cleared somewhat from last night, we can stand back and analyse the results. Some Conservatives are feeling low; some on the Left are roaring, but the picture isn't as bad as it looks. There were winners and losers last night, but hardly the Blue Tsunami predicted by the Corporate Media. 

     Nonetheless, the Corporate Media is spinning the election results as some kind of major turning point in some great NPC uprising. 

    Not so, though. Though the Democrats regained control of the House, they largely did so at the expense of the Swamp RINOs. The fake Conservatives were the biggest losers of the night. The Republicans who stood with Trump fared well; and, as one pundit noted: the GOP is clearly the Party of Trump now. 

    The House of Representatives and the Corporate Media are going to be a sideshow for the next two years. Really the transition of power from RINO Ryan to Nancy Pelosi isn't going change much in terms of policy. We're talking here about 'doing nothing' vs. 'aggressive obstructionism'. Trump has accomplished much already without any input from these dunces and he can continue to do so. The biggest problem---besides numerous time-wasting investigations into any allegation against Trump whispered in anybody's ear---will be passing the President's budgetary and tax-reform plans for 2019 and 2020. 

    With the RINOs out of the way, things are looking positive for 2020 and Trump's second term. The Senate races from yesterday are indicative of future trends. Arizona, Utah, and Tennessee were held by GOP candidates after incumbents retired. Florida, Indiana, North Dakota, and Missouri passed into GOP hands. The only loss came in Nevada---a state which has been shifting Left for years now. 

    The Abortion Racket suffered two resounding defeats in Alabama and West Virginia. Alabama became the first state to recognize an unborn foetus as human being. West Virginia cut state funding for abortion mills. Alabama also voted to allow the Ten Commandments to be displayed on public property again. In a rare case of Liberals actually learning from their mistakes, Washington voters enacted a prohibition against localities taxing foodstuffs. This is a response to Seattle's disastrous Sweetened Beverage Tax enacted in January. 

    As Conservatives, the thing for us to do right now is to stay the course. It may not look like it now, but the best is yet to come. 

Sunday, November 4, 2018


    On Friday night, another of the Red-Pill Cult decided to become a martyr for whichever Manosphere mountebanks he happened to follow. The Chicago Tribune relates:

    "A brooding military veteran (nota bene) and former teacher (nota bene) appeared to have made videos in which he railed at women and blacks, years before he fatally shot two women at a Florida yoga studio, wounded five other people and then killed himself." 

     That the perpetrator this cowardly attack---a complete loser named Scott Beierle---is part of the Red Pill Movement is almost self-evident from that description alone. And sure enough, The New York Intelligencer didn't have to dig very deep to find proof. Beierle was involved in the Incel sect, as evidenced by much of the terminology that he employed. He was also an admirer of Incel heroes Eliot Roger and Alex Minassian. These two killed 17 people between the two of them; and spoke of a social revolution wherein the sexual sans-culottes would rise up in violence and establish some New Order, or something.

    Like many other Red Pills, Beierle had an extensive criminal record: mostly minor cases of sexual battery; and he was banned from the Florida State University campus. 

    One part of the problem that we face in America dealing with this potentially violent sect is that there is a genuine issue underlying it that effects normal men. Not only do we live in a misandryist culture, there are significant obstacles facing single men today. Among them are demographic problems; miseducated and disinformed women who have no idea how to maintain a real relationship; and a media culture which simultaneously shames men for not being sexual conquistadors while destroying men who actually live up to that 'ideal'. 

     The fact is that men today have been dealt a difficult hand; but that men have to play the cards as they're dealt. The Incel Cult attracts many vulnerable men who (wrongly) blame themselves for a lack of sexual success. They are then gulled by their cult leaders into projecting their self-loathing onto women. Male Feminists actually do the same thing, though they 'embrace' their self-loathing. The logical end of the Incel is mass-murder; the logical end of the Male Feminist is suicide.

     The way that normal men can protect themselves from this kind of fate is to understand this simple proverb: You are not your circumstances. Or, as famous psychiatrist Viktor Frankl expressed in active terms: "An abnormal reaction to an abnormal situation is normal behavior." And Frankl knew, because he survived Auschwitz. In our Postmodern Era of Sexual Anarchism, not having a traditional, stable relationship doesn't make you any more of a loser than getting sent to Auschwitz made one a criminal. 

     The same cannot be said, however, for the leaders of these kinds of online communities. They are mostly dishonest men; and hypocrites besides, because their misogyny really stems from latent/repressed homosexuality. Both Roger and Minassian were obvious homosexuals, though we'll never hear that admitted in this Politically-Correct milieu. The reason that they encourage violence against women is because women represent symbolically (in the Incels' neurotic reasoning) the evil within themselves. They're driven to destroy to, in a sense, offer human sacrifices to relieve their own guilty consciences. 

    Don't fall for their lies. They just use men like Bierele to work out their own psychological dysfunctions. Nobody is going to improve gender relations via terrorism: that's just common sense. Just do the best you can, and don't make apologies. And above all, don't become radicalized.  

Friday, November 2, 2018


     Alec Baldwin, a prominent Left-Wing Hollywood loudmouth, is in a New York City Jail today after losing his marbles at a Manhattan parking lot and beating a man half his size. Baldwin, who has a net worth of over $65 million, apparently flipped out after another driver took a parking space ahead of him. 

     We can't confirm rumors that the victim of Baldwin's Liberal outrage is a Trump supporter; hence we can't say with any certainty that this was a TDS-related attack. But everyone---especially Conservatives---needs to be extra vigilant right now because Leftists are imploding everywhere. 

     Witnesses say that Baldwin leapt from his vehicle screaming hysterically and shouting profanity. He caught the victim with a sucker-punch and reportedly began kicking and stamping on the man until police dragged him off. Baldwin was shrieking and making obscene gestures at the shocked crowd of onlookers before being hauled off to Greenwich Village Precinct. Police declined to say whether he was given a psychiatric evaluation or not. 

      Baldwin was jailed once before in 2014. In that case, he was stopped by two officers for cycling the wrong way on a one-way street. Baldwin flew into a rage; attacked the two police officers (one of whom was a woman) screaming profanity interspersed with self-aggrandizing phrases like: "Don't you know who I am?" and "My taxes pay your salaries! I'm the star of '30 Rock'!" Other police arrived and subdued the rampaging actor. 

      This is the type of personality whom the Left looks up to as a role model. It's said that he parodies President Trump on Saturday Night Live: a TV show that hasn't been worth watching since about 1985. 

      Social Media wasn't showing much sympathy for the millionaire celebrity's outburst.

    To the President's son's question: sadly, it's not shocking anymore. It's just the American Liberals being themselves.