THE CLANCY CASE AND THE CHURCHIANS

        Every so often, usually when the Political Class and their Corporate Overlords desperately need a distraction, the Legal Establishment, the Media Cartels, and a few cheap political ward-heelers get together and decide that we are due for another Trial of the Century. These spectacles are typically like the Super Bowl, election campaigns, and the latest Hollywood Blockbuster: all bigger, better---and most importantly of all---more profitable than the previous one. 

       One would assume during this month, that we'd be talking about the trial around the murder of slain activist Charlie Kirk, which has taken a year already with no resolution. The Elites apparently decided that there's already too much controversy over that case; and, if the recent FOIA Request by some social media personalities are accurate, it would appear that FBI Director Kash Patel is busy hunting down Internet trolls who are making fun of him. 

           In fairness to Kash Patel, however, we can't help but observe that his priorities are about the same as millions of other Americans who'd rather not think about minor issues like the disastrous wars in the Middle East and Ukraine; or the massive wealth-transfers and power-grabs being carried out by the Deep State; or the rapid and continual decline of both our physical and social infrastructure; etc. No: what has every American's attention riveted comes from Massachusetts. We speak, of course, of the Lindsay Clancy Case.

        The Clancy Case ended this week with a mistrial; which will allow the lawyers and media figures to milk the tragic murder of three children for more dollars and notoriety. The deliberate politicization and monetizing of this case has led to furious online discussions. There's even a split among the New Right on this issue. The Alpha Red Pilled Cult is highlighting the case to bolster their theories about inherent female depravity; while others have synced with the Whacko Left demanding that the case is a test case on the alleged epidemic of Post-Partum Depression. 

       Neither position should be surprising: we're not dealing with Conservatives here---we're talking about Left-Wing Reactionaries. The Alphas represent the Radical Feminist position, embracing the stereotypes of masculinity that the Feminists draw and claim them as a badge of honor. People who look up to characters like Andrew Tate and Elon Musk as role models aren't likely to have worldview premised on the sanctity of womanhood. At the other pole are mostly MAGA Churchian women of the sort who fought to overturn abortion bans after Roe vs. Wade was nullified. These women already can't fawn over the Trump Administration hard enough: applauding them even when they bomb schools abroad and drag kids away in chains to be deported to hellish Concentration Camps at home; so, obviously, the deaths of three innocent children won't bother them too much. 

       Let us suppose, however, that there really is an epidemic of Post-Partum Depression going on in America; and there really are millions of mothers so affected. How many end by murdering their children? Of course, interested news outlets catapult any such case to the headlines now that the issue sells; but even those rare cases illustrate that most mothers seem to be coping with the existing system without resorting to homicide.

        Another question that should be asked are about things like why the United States has fallen to 54th place globally in Infant Mortality Rates, which is near the bottom of developed nations. We might also inquire why we rank 65th globally in women who die in childbirth; also near the bottom of developed nations. Or we might ask why almost 1 in 7 American women of child-bearing age are clinically infertile? 

        But asking questions like these wouldn't serve the purposes of the interest-groups promoting the Clancy Case, and most of the so-called Christian Right doesn't seem too concerned about them either. That would also mean facing real problems that we as a Culture would have address; but most Americans prefer to trust the experts and put their own heads in the sand.

POLITICAL THEATER AND THE OHIO ATTACK

          This weekend, some whacko attacked a candidate for the Ohio Governor's seat. The target of the attack was a Democrat; and, never letting a good crisis go to waste, the Controlled Opposition was quick to pounce on the fact that the assailant is related to a campaign activist who was fired from the Republican candidate's campaign. Of course, the Democrats didn't use the opportunity to highlight the threat to the public that things like, say, NSPM-7 poses; but they'd rather not talk about that, since they hope to have the same powers should the Oligarchs decide to appoint their Party to manage the Government. 

         The Ohio Gubernatorial Race has been hyped heavily by the Corporate Media as "a race to watch" in the lead-up to Super Bowl Sunday Election Night; even though both candidates are merely play-doh figurines crafted by Big Pharma to ensure that their vast economic interests in Ohio are protected. The Democrat candidate, Amy Acton, was appointed by arch-RINO Governor Mike DeWine to oversee that State's draconian Scamdemic policies. The Republican candidate, WEF Young Global Leader and former DOGE co-chair Vivek Ramaswamy made a fortune with Soros-funded venture capital to manufacture Contact Tracing software.  

         A Democrat who worked for DeWine and a Republican supported by Soros: one would be hard-pressed to find a better representation of the Uniparty today than the Ohio Governor's race.

        

           Given the usual lack of transparency from Law Enforcement and the sheer phoniness of the American Electoral Process, it would be tempting to see Sunday's attack as a psy-op. I tend to believe that this was genuinely a 'lone nut.' No doubt that the Strategy of Tension employed by our Deep State encourages such acts. However, the Oligarchs have so normalized Political Violence that they probably rarely need to organize such attacks: it's only a matter of waiting for one to happen and then having a general plan in place to capitalize on the aftermath. In this case, the story is being spun to portray the Controlled Opposition as glorious heroes risking their lives to save the country against unstable elements, while Big Pharma and the Insurance Cartels laugh up their sleeves at a public who buys into the narrative. In other words, regardless of the motives behind such attacks, such incidents serve a useful purpose as a distraction. 

          A culture that is as systemically corrupt as ours is bound to produce such candidates, such manipulation, and such outbreaks of violence. We, as a culture, desperately need to do some soul-searching as to how and why we choose such characters to represent us. 

           

THE CLANCY TRIAL AND TRASH CULTURE WRIT LARGE

        So, in the last week the United States continues its descent into accelerated cultural decline. With Trade Wars and shooting-wars breaking out all over the place; the Police/Surveillance State ramping up to full speed; atomic war being discussed seriously; and the wealth-transfers continue flying up the chimney to the Globalist Elites---American Social and Entertainment Media is focusing on one of the things that unite the American Public's attention: sensational trials with political overtones. 

      Even though our Constitution (which was written by Dead White Males whom everyone ignores these days) guarantees "the Right to a Speedy and Public Trial," a murder that took place in 2023 is finally being tried. The sluggishness of our so-called 'Justice System' should be a topic of discussion in and of itself; but our Founding Fathers lived in a day and age before Trial-by-Mass-Media, and a heavily corrupted and commercially-driven Legal System. 

     We're speaking of course of the Lindsay Clancy Case, which we wrote about the time that it happened: it was a cause celebre among the Whacko Left and everyone else who could cash in either politically or economically. Forgetting about the three children who were murdered, the Left brought out the Victim Cards for the mother/murderer. We also did a follow-up on the father involved, who also played Victim Card and has come out with a tidy profit of his own. He's since remarried and both he and Lindsay Clancy have pending lawsuits against the State. During the three years which have passed, everybody involved is cashing in even more: lawyers, media, the families, politicians, Big Pharma: but that's not where the controversy lies.

      In a Culture where Abortion is considered a fundamental Human Right, homos are allowed to adopt children, public schools are hellscapes and Genocide is considered legitimate Foreign Policy it's not surprising that the murdered children would be the last thing on Americans' minds. No: instead, this case has become a political football, with one side using it to support or attack Big Pharma; and another using it to support or attack Radical Feminism. 

        There's something radically wrong with a Society when the first reaction to the murder of three children is "how do we capitalize on this?" We excoriate our Leaders for never letting a good crisis go to waste, but the Clancy Case is an example of the kind of moral societal compass in today's America that brings such creatures to positions of power. Our System is failing because those leading it---both the Political Class and the Oligarchy who owns them---are actually representatives of a failed Culture. The Elites, of course, make it worse by encouraging social division and degeneration. Our Culture, in turn, becomes a negative feedback loop: those who are most repelled by cultural corruption are those most capable of fighting it; but the interests of the corrupt Elites prevents such people from assuming any position of effecting meaningful change.

         

         

TIME FOR IRAN TO FINISH THE JOB

        This week, our nominal Head-of-State was in Turkey (which is itself on the Globalists' target-list, despite President Erdogan's steadfast refusal to face facts), to whip our NATO client-states into line. With the exception of its rebellious subjects in Spain and Denmark, the once-proud nations of Europe bowed down and grovelled dutifully at their master's feet.  

       Puffed up by all of these accolades, the US Delegation (officially) scrapped the so-called 'Peace Deal' with Iran. Not that our Deep State ever honored it in the first place; as we explained on the first day of the conflict, the psychological constitution of our leadership mitigates against entering into any kind of genuine negotiation or peace. The so-called Memorandum of Understanding was agreed to only to buy time for the Pentagon and the treacherous Gulf State monarchies to rearm, as well as for the Zionists to carry out their Greater Israel Project. Anybody who has ever dealt with the American Corporate/Legal State knows how worthless such documents are. American contractual arrangements are always framed to appear legally binding; but with enough elasticity and flexibility that the more powerful side can break or violate it at will. We've seen this before in similar situations: Venezuela mostly notably, whose President was kidnapped during negotiations.

     Such was the Memorandum of Understanding. With the Gangland Ethos characteristic of Postmodern American Society, the Pentagon attempted to force passage of the Strait of Hormuz, ostensibly to guide some commercial ships which were transiting illegally. The Iranians intercepted them; and seeing both the Peace Process and the funeral services for the slain Ayatollah Khamenei as an opportunity and as a sign of weakness, the Pentagon launched a sneak attack on the Iranian Republic.

      The attacks struck mostly marinas, railways, bridges, power plants, and a few oil refineries, but did little military damage. The Iranian Military has hit back; striking bases in the Gulf States that the Pentagon and IDF were secretly trying to re-arm; as well as a US base in Jordan and reportedly a US warship. The Pentagon and the Gulf State Oligarchies are, as usual, pretending that there were no damages or casualties. Not that the American public especially cares about Pentagon censorship or War Crimes: the latest sex scandals are more to their tastes. In fact, if it weren't for muh gas prices, the American public wouldn't care about Globalist atrocities in the Middle East or Deep State domestic tyranny at all.

        There is little point, however, in expecting political solutions to arise from the American people themselves. The important thing today is how Iran and the people of the Middle East will react. The attacks this week make the third time (the fourth, if we count the Globalist-backed attempted Color Revolution in January) that the US has attempted the overthrow of Iran by violent means during a Peace Negotiation. To borrow a phrase from American slang, it's time for Iran "to finish the job." 

      By 'finishing the job,' we mean forgetting useless 'peace deals,' and so-called 'tit-for-tat' responses and focus on driving the Globalist hegemons out of the Middle East. That means a strategy of closing down the Strait and choking the Globalists economically. That means overthrowing the Globalists' puppet monarchies and governments in the region. That means putting the Zionist pigs down once and for all. That means targeting American bases including developing long-range capabilities to push them out of the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. 

     Peace will never come to the Middle East until the Globalists are driven out permanently. The goal of Globalist organizations is to control of the entire planet under the model of the kind of Inverted Totalitarianism long-established now here in the United States, Israel, and much of Europe. The Globalists see the peoples of the Middle East in the same way they view their subject populations: as expendable and human capital for their own power and profit.  

       

     

THE OHIO HORROR AND AMERICA'S CHILDREN

          A story that broke in the US Media this week concerned one of the worst cases of domestic abuse: not that such incidents are uncommon in Exceptional America these days, but the case was remarkable for its magnitude. Local police were serving a warrant on a dirtbag in the rural village of Hamden, Ohio. They couldn't enter the home because of an overpowering smell and, according to local reports, the floor appeared unsafe. 

         They called for reinforcements, and what they found in a 12x12 room were 16 people---some children and some teenagers. Their condition was appalling. They were confined to this room for nearly four years; police found them in piles of human waste and trash, covered with insects, emaciated and disoriented; a 'feral condition' as one described it. 

         The first image that came to my mind on hearing these depictions were some of the footage I'd seen of Concentration Camp inmates liberated in Europe during the Second World War. Conditions weren't that much different from the victims of that horrible system. The authorities reported that some of the victims were near death: if the police have any sense, of course, they would see if there were others who weren't so lucky, but nobody's holding their breath relying on their competence. The suspects responsible for this horror looked about like the types one would expect to find:

              Predictably, the neighbors in this town of 727 souls when interviewed by the local press, had absolutely no idea that anything was even out of the ordinary. Some swore that they didn't even know that there were children living there. The police stated that the smell was so intense that it was noticeable from the street, apparently this didn't arouse any concern among the residents of Hamden. The house was owned by a Trustee for an estate, apparently nobody in four years ever bothered inspecting the home. The bad smell clung to the suspects when they went about town and they were described as wearing rags, but nobody thought of doing a welfare check. 

          Such is the typical story: nobody knew. But one reporter questioned the cashiers at the local Dollar General and got a slightly different story. 

          "Employees at the Hamden Dollar General say that the Siders were regular customers...often accompanied by just one of their children.

          "I noticed that he would keep her really close to her," said one cashier. "She was not allowed to speak to nobody, I noticed that. And when the kids came in, they were all very thin, ghost-white, didn't have any weight on their bodies, and they had their hair over their faces...

         "The employees tried to help, offering the family clothes and hygiene products, but they said that they never saw those items put to use...that odor described in the house was noticeable every time the family came into the store..."

       So nobody knew, huh? Like so many other of our societal problems, this appears to have been a case of nobody wanting to know. 

       At the ensuing spectacle staged for the Media, sanctimonious Vinton County officials brought out the usual trope about how concerned they were for the children's welfare. One official even had the gall to compare conditions in the home to "a third world country" and lamented that "things like this don't happen in America." Let's set the record straight on this point: we don't hear stories like these in foreign countries, but abuse and neglect of children and minors happen here on nearly a daily basis. Why is this so? It's because other cultures have a sense of community and a sense of responsibility for their neighborhoods. Our postmodern culture is very much an every man for himself society, and what doesn't affect directly one person isn't considered relevant to anybody.

      The fact that many---if not most---Americans consider Abortion until the day of birth as a basic Human Right; the fact that our public schools are hellscapes and our so-called 'child welfare system' is rife with corruption and a complete disregard for justice; the fact that homosexual grooming of children and minors is not only permitted but encouraged; the fact that the US is at or near the bottom of Developed Nations in both infant mortality and mothers dying in childbirth; the fact that suicide is the second leading cause of death among those aged 10-18 years---these facts tell us all that we need to know about how much Americans really care about 'the children.'

      We, as a culture, need to stop pretending that we're shocked by things like the Hamden Case and start coming to grips with the fact that our own rotten culture is toxic for children, and young people generally. Until we start facing that fact, such stories will become more common. 

      

THE EPSTEIN 'SCANDAL' AND CULTURAL ROT

        Anybody who's been following events here in the Prozac Nation probably saw that figurehead US Attorney-General Pam Bondi finally was called to testify before Congress yesterday. What do we suppose that our fearless public servants in Congress and our highly dedicated professional journalists focused upon? Was it to answer for the obvious bungling of another high-profile crime? Or was it to answer for ongoing cover-ups of ICE brutality? Or maybe it was to answer concerns about NSPM-7 and the potential for over-reach involved in classifying Politically Correct thought-crimes as acts of Domestic Terrorism? Maybe it was even to answer questions about seizures of voter rolls and records? 

        Well, no; it was none of those things. Ms. Pamela was called before Congress for the one thing that Americans consider more important than entrusting unaccountable police power into the hands of fools and incompetents. No: the whole proceeding focused upon online controversies surrounding muh Epstein Files. 

         This isn't just an American phenomenon either. Over in Old Blighty, the last Epstein release was enough to trigger an emergency session of Parliament: something that British support for Zionist Genocide or Keir Starmer's aggressive pushes for Digital ID systems and encroachments on Internet freedom couldn't accomplish. Members of the untouchable so-called House of Lords have been forced to resign and there's a furious debate that Prince Andrew sullied the sterling reputation of the British Crown which the descendants of George III have weathered from the perversions of Queen Victoria's Court to the suspicious death of Princess Diana.  

        North of the Border, too, the official cover-up of yet another Rainbow Warrior being involved in a mass-shooting this week has faded into the background because Epstein visited the country in 2014 and Canadian politicians have shown up on the 'list.' 

       I'm certain that Australia and New Zealand aren't far behind the rest of the English-speaking world in these respects just judging from the mass-hysteria that's emerged there over previous allegations of sexual impropriety. 

      The obvious conclusion that we can draw from these events is that the English-speaking world has a radically defective moral compass. The problem, however, goes much deeper than that. The English-speaking Western Nations are deeply repressive sexual cultures. Their fawning idolization of the Rainbow Pride movement doesn't counter that argument: it confirms it. Homosexuality and related perversions become prominent in a cultural milieu where natural sexual affections and interests are repressed. The mass-hysteria over the Epstein Files and its elevation to national crises stages is further proof of this. 

      The degeneration of sexuality didn't occur overnight; it's been part of an ongoing pressure campaign for the last few decades. Natural sexuality effects the individual on the deepest psychological level, and it's in the interests of totalitarian ideologues to undermine it as much as possible. This is one reason why homosexuals have such strong inclinations for supporting authoritarian regimes. 

          Americans, by and large, have bought into the anti-sexual zeitgeist, beginning with the Radical Feminism of the 1970s and reaching a full-on cultural crusade with Hilary Clinton's Gender Wars and the Controlled Opposition's Ritual Abuse panics of the 1990s. It's in the interests of the Ruling Elites to foment as much fear and division between the sexes as possible. This is the Strategy of Tension applied to the most individual and personal levels---and, of course, to the Elites the personal is political. 

       Some may ask: is what you're suggesting is that the current incarnation of the Epstein 'Scandal' is a psyop? That is exactly what I'm suggesting. Let's not forget who started this whole manufactured controversy in the first place:

         Like Epstein, Musk is a firm believer in both Transhumanism and Eugenics. Of course, those elements of Epstein's activities will be swept under the rug and the focus will be on lurid (hetero) sexual details that are alleged to have happened on Epstein Island. Musk and his Incel moles in DOGE---who got sweeping access to governmental records and now control wide swaths of Social Media can frame the controversy at will and, yes: they are doing so to advance their own agendas while distracting attention from issues which we should take seriously.

      

 

        

IS NSPM-7 A THIRD RAIL TOPIC?

         In the recent wave of Government-sponsored violence against people on American Soil---citizens and non-citizens alike---we've seen a marked and radical departure from previous official criminal actions. The Bush/Clinton 'War on Drugs,' the Bush/Obama 'War on Terror;' and the Uniparty's joint acts of tyranny during the Scamdemic were all committed against the backdrop of at least quasi-legality. There were Congressional debates, some adverse Court decisions, etc. What has changed in this circumstance isn't simply the phoniness of the alleged 'crisis.' The New Right has not only behaved with complete disregard for any Constitutional Balance of Power, it has openly declared its opponents as de facto Enemies of the State and created de facto Secret Police Forces and political paramilitary units to act as enforcers with no accountability or civilian oversight. The Christian Nationalists and White Supremacists currently running DHS, the DOJ, and the Pentagon have made no secret of what their intentions are,

           The figure of 100 million, of course, is mathematically impossible if we're talking only about immigrants: the fact here is that they intend to strip other undesirables of their citizenship as well. The murder of a US citizen in Minneapolis, followed by the attempted murder of two immigrants in Portland this last week---and more importantly the response from the White House, which has doubled down even harder since, Both the Administration's actions and its response are premised on a National Security Presidential Memorandum decreed in September and put into play shortly before Christmas, NSPM-7.

           NSPM-7 broadly defines what constitutes terrorism indicators, relative to the situations in Minneapolis and Portland is that "extremism on migration" (whatever that means) is listed specifically as covered as a terrorist act. Despite its egregious illegality and obvious intent to weaponize federal police forces against Administration opponents, it appears that NSPM-7 has become a Third Rail Topic that neither wing of the Uniparty nor the Corporate Media cares to discuss. Journalist Ken Klippenstein, who broke the story about NSPM-7 and has been one of the only media figures covering this noted that:

         "It’s likely we’re about to hear a lot more about the incident in the coming days. But what you won’t hear about is the role of Trump’s national security directive NSPM-7 in all of this. Signed last September following the murder of Charlie Kirk, NSPM-7 directs the federal government to focus on rooting out domestic terrorism. The directive singles out violence against ICE in particular as a leading domestic terror threat. Four days later, Attorney General Pam Bondi signed her own directive building upon NSPM-7 and titled 'Ending Political Violence Against ICE.'

       "Bondi’s order directs federal law enforcement to crack down on threats to ICE officers, which it defines broadly to include things like 'doxing' as well as impeding their enforcement actions...The directive goes on to direct prosecutors to target those interfering with or impeding ICE actions. 'The U.S. Attorney’s Office for each district shall prosecute any individual who assaults or forcibly impedes or intimidates these officers, who interferes with the performance of these officers’ official duties, or who attempts to do so, consistent with 18 U.S.C.§ 111 and other applicable federal laws,' the document says."

       Klippenstein is right: the Administration itself, which has been acting under NSPM-7's provisions have made no mention of it; nor have the Democrats, who are pretending to be outraged but are only using the shooting for a political wedge issue. During the last two days, I have waded through several Democrat Controlled Opposition sites, blogs, and vlogs: the Young Turks: MS NOW, Bluesky, etc. Not a peep about NSPM-7 anywhere, though a few have ventured to speculate that the ICE raids are designed to divert attention from muh Epstein Files. 😔 The New Right isn't the only one with a broken moral compass, obviously. 

       All of this raises the question: why hasn't anybody brought this up? Why is discussion of NSPM-7 seemingly off-limits for the Uniparty, the Corporate Media, or the paid parrots in Academia to broach? The most basic answer, as with all Third Rail Topics, is that they don't want the public prying deeper and asking questions about its effects or import. The Brennan Center's assessment probably comes close to the truth: "Existing laws give the president great latitude in combating threats to national security. NSPM-7 and the antifa executive order are an obvious abuse of this latitude, threatening to turn the full force of the federal government to rooting out a conjured-up left-wing conspiracy of political violence funded by shadowy figures. Neither the law nor the facts support this premise, and court challenges to actions taken pursuant to these orders will likely meet with success."

       In other words, the less attention drawn to NSPM-7, the less likely that it will be contested; the Democrats evidently have agreed not to push it because they may wish to employ its powers themselves some day---much as they never opposed the Patriot Act for the same reason. In the meantime, we should do all within our power to expose this horrid Directive; leave comments on news sites about it; bring it up on discussion forums; question politicians about it at town-halls, wherever ICE abuses are being discussed. Awareness is the key to short-circuiting the Third Rail. 

        

EPSTEIN AND EXASPERATION

        So, this weekend, I took an extended break at a colleague's currently disused ski chalet---it's sometimes necessary to get away from mass-insanity when it breaks out at this level. When the mob's aroused, there's no reasoning with it, and this whole national obsession with the Epstein Files is about as irrational as anything we've seen most of the last three decades.

      As we've written here before, I wouldn't mind writing about Epstein if there was something of substance to discuss. Jeffrey Epstein made his fortune as a shady hedge-fund manager and, like, many of that class, lived with one foot in the Federal Penitentiary and the other on a banana peel. He was cunning enough to get out of Wall Street before he got caught; bought a private island which functioned as a Black Budget site for our's (and foreign) governments. Epstein always sold to the highest bidder. There, Epstein engaged in the sorts of things an island sultan would do: he sold secrets, laundered money, engaged in blackmail, etc. He also donated some of the proceeds to various transhumanist, eugenicist, and globalist projects for various Deep States: sometimes acting as a front-man for those who wished not to have their names associated with such schemes. Epstein later died in prison in an obvious extrajudicial murder and Ghislaine Maxwell---one of the least important figures in Epstein's operation---was offered as a human sacrifice to divert public attention from everything else listed above.

    Now, if releasing the Epstein Files---assuming that such information really was just lying around an office somewhere just waiting to be exposed---then it would be worth discussing. Instead, Epstein had a seraglio of Playboy-bunny types at his island and some men who visited had sex with some of them, some of whom were considered, solely by statutory fiat, as legal 'minors' in some jurisdictions. Unfortunately, in our Postmodern Dystopia where the personal is political and men and women are supposed to hate and fear each other, men and women engaging in sexual activities is considered far worse than Treason, Extortion, Criminal Conspiracy and all of the other crimes Epstein was actually guilty of committing. Likewise, the release of the Epstein Files serve as a diversion from much more serious matters going on in our country and the world right now.

    I'm sorry if I don't consider the women on the island as 'victims.' Most were older than my Grandmothers were when they were already married and raising children. I actually graduated high school with married women---two of whom were pregnant by their husbands. 

   Attitudes about such things in America only changed within most of our lifetimes. Hilary Clinton---an obvious Lesbian---started much of the hysteria in the 1990s with her Feminist friends and their gender wars. It's still the Rainbow Mafia that's been keeping the Gender Wars alive all of these years. Consider who's been the loudest about releasing the Epstein Files: mostly it's been the Whacko Left Wing which hasn't talked about much of anything else for the last few months. These are people who see nothing wrong with men donning a wig and dress and hanging out on ladies' rooms; or allowing perverts to promote homosexuality to actual children of elementary school age, or permitting homo 'couples' to adopt and groom babies from birth. This is very important to keep in mind when they screech that teenagers 'can't give consent.'

   The Reactionary Wing of the Uniparty (a.k.a. the Republican Party) have many adding to the voices of hysteria---although they're usually more covert about their own perversions (at least their partisans see fit to give them a free pass). WEF Young Global Leader and proponent of transhumanism and eugenics Elon Musk largely was responsible for generating the current Epstein Hysteria.

     Musk, of course, has fathered an unknown number of children by In-Vitro Fertilization---probably as a rationalization for his own rumored impotence---because he believes that only those of "superior" genetics should procreate. For the rest of us rabble, he's offered animated characters to relieve sexual tension without the benefit of an actual member of the opposite sex.

    These are the specimens of the kinds of people who want to dictate to the rest of society who should be attracted to whom, and what is sexually inappropriate and what is not. As an example of what Media Trash Culture does consider an ideal relationship, let's look at the most hyped one at the moment:

    Yes: a 35 year-old pop star and a retarded NFL thug who looks like he thinks that the Scamdemic shortage of soap is still ongoing. In other words, the Corporate Media is just about the last place anybody should look for relationship advice---and certainly not for setting standards.

    Honestly, if we have reached a cultural point where we allow our so-called 'superiors' to decide our interpersonal relationships for us, then we've hit a social nadir under which they can dictate to us anything they want to---and it ought to be obvious by now that they're doing exactly that. It's how authoritarian regimes operate ideally and how cults operate in actuality. Civilized societies, in contrast, don't depreciate sexuality but Civilization is something that we seem to be moving away from with each passing year.

    

    

    

     

TPUSA ADMITS LEAKED E-MAILS ARE GENUINE

         Admittedly, I don't follow podcaster Candace Owens very much, but based on recent stories about her, she was evidently close to slain Christian Nationalist influencer Charlie Kirk. Candace has been questioning the Official Narrative surrounding Kirk's shooting in Utah last month. While admittedly I haven't looked into her questions about the ballistics involved (she was evidently a friend of Kirk's), the story has many other anomalies, questions about which ought to raised. For example, the day of the shooting, a local kook named George Zinn was originally apprehended, but then dismissed as a suspect and jailed for Obstruction of Justice. Yet, a few hours later, FBI chieftain Kash Patel announced another suspect in custody, then stated that the suspect was questioned and released. Who was this suspect? Why did they suspect him? 

         Also quite unusual has been the Media coverage, which has been predominantly all on the same page. Typically, when there is a high-profile shooting we hear heavy coverage of the suspect: in this case, practically nothing has been reported about the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson. There is no footage of him actually holding the weapon---which was supposedly conveniently found nearby with ideological messages inscribed on the cartridges. How he was captured is a story full of conflicting information too. Allegedly, Robinson turned himself in, but then we were told that he hasn't cooperated with the investigation. 

       Then, there was the Rapid Response from the White House---like the 9/11 attacks, it seems rather peculiar that the Uniparty had all of these proposed reactionary pieces of legislation all prepared and ready to go so quickly. On Kirk's postmortem podcast, J.D. Vance and Stephen Miller admitted that they were working with Kirk on a plan to target Left-Wing activist groups. All across the globe, there were memorials and eulogies from foreign governments---rather strange for an internet influencer who was little-known, certainly lesser known than someone like Joe Rogan or Tucker Carlson. Adding to this strange reaction, we had a Memorial Service in Arizona choreographed like a Super Bowl Halftime Show in a sports stadium that was supposedly cobbled together in less than a week. 

         The Democrats have been putting on some shows of their own, bringing in Kash Patel and Pam Bondi to testify, but the Hearings always devolve into their favorite topic, muh Epstein Files. Earlier this week, however, Candace Owens---who actually seems to be doing what the politicians and media should be doing--- received some leaked internal e-mails from Turning-Point USA sent a few days before Kirk's untimely demise. Yesterday, TPUSA confirmed that the e-mails were genuine. 

        "The leaked messages were first shown by conservative commentator Candace Owens during her YouTube podcast on Monday. According to the screenshots, Kirk wrote, 'I just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won’t cancel Tucker.' The remark apparently referred to Kirk’s refusal to withdraw an invitation for fellow conservative commentator Tucker Carlson to speak at his AmericaFest conference. In a follow-up message, Kirk wrote that he had 'no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.'”

      So, basically what we have here is a confession that Kirk's support for the Zionist cause was wholly contingent on the payoffs he was receiving from a wealthy donor. One has to wonder how many of TPUSA's positions are contingent upon the other generous NGOs and Interest Groups that fund this enterprise. As we pointed out earlier, Kirk's family had long ties to the Trump family, and was cultivated from a young age to be the public face of the New Right's version of other Youth Movements. This is further proof that most of these 'influencers' are simply Controlled Opposition, willing to sell their influence to the highest bidder. 

     The 'Jewish Donor' in question is purportedly shady hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman, CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, whose firm has been involved in several highly questionable financial deals. Ackman is a partner in Bill Gates' Giving Pledge, a consortium of financial Oligarchs committed to funding private interests under the guise of public philanthropy. Ackman most notoriously recently sponsored a convocation of such 'influencers' at summit in the Hamptons, and, of course, nobody is raising any concerns about the overt foreign lobbying of the so-called 'alternative media' being carried out by the Israeli Government.

     It is unlikely that Ackman will be investigated for any of this, given his outstanding influence with both wings of the Uniparty; nor will Kirk's rather questionable dealings with him, since Kirk's carefully-cultivated image is being used as a prop to advance the Administration's policies. As always, we must question the source, and pay attention to who's doing what behind the scenes. 

     

         

ANOTHER RED-PILLED CROOK GETS A FREE PASS

       One of the main features of Authoritarian Governments is that---despite their self-righteous affirmations of upholding Law and Order---is their noted flexibility when it actually comes to enforcing laws. For the last several years (this decade in particular) we've seen both the Republicans and Democrats engage in this sort of behavior: politically-motivated witch-hunts are instituted against those of whom the State wishes to make examples of; while violations of the Law deemed Politically Correct are given a free pass. As we're now entering the final stages of the Consolidation of Power under a Corporate-controlled Unitary Executive, such free use of the Judiciary in pardoning utter blackguards in the name of Political Expediency has become more common.

      Now, if we simply change some terminology in this quote from Lenin, it would sound eerily similar to the position taken by the New Right. The True Believers likewise believe (and Trump himself has said) that the Executive Branch can do no wrong, and that force and contempt for Congressional or Judicial decisions establish the Character of the popular mandate against the enemies within and that laws happen to be whatever the Executive Branch say they are (provided, of course, that the Democrats don't happen to control the Executive Branch). These same True Believers will fly into Denial if anybody compares the New Right to Bolshevism; no matter that the ideologues who founded the Neocon Movement were all Bolsheviks at one time. 

      Lenin was also the political philosopher who coined the term Political Correctness. In the early days of the Soviet Union, the Cheka---which was their version of the State Security Police set up here under the Department of Homeland Security---were given latitude to forgive such crimes as were deemed to further the interests of the Bolshevik cause. The Red Pills have been forgiving all manner of such criminals: Ross Ulbricht, Rod Blagojevich, Andrew Tate, and various others while turning the likes of Elon Musk loose on Government agencies to wipe out elements that might be inclined to enforce laws against himself or his WEF cronies.

       So today comes the news that Attorney-General Pam Bondi is dropping all Federal Charges against another Red-Pill cause celebre, Dr. Michael Kirk Moore. We published an article about Dr. Moore's activities at the time that he was jailed. To summarize: during the Scamdemic, Moore ordered a huge supply of COVID vaccines, which he subsequently either destroyed or sold on the Black Market. At the same, for a considerable fee, he wrote out fake Vaxx Compliance paperwork to skirt Scamdemic restrictions. 

      Unlike some doctors (my own included) who lost their positions at clinics for standing up to the COVID hoax; Dr. Moore adapted the go-along-to-get-along mindset promoted by fake 'Conservatives' and Churchians at the time---and made a profit besides. That kind of sleazy behavior was considered an Alpha move by the usual suspects, who no doubt also considered taking a stand like other doctors was fine for Beta Chumps. Like the aforementioned Ulbricht and Tate, Moore became a symbol of those 'unjustly persecuted' by Biden's Reign of Terror---which the Red Pills have since appropriated and turned against their former enemies.

      Ms. Pamela's announcement came just five days after a massive rally in Salt Lake City demanding Moore's release. The rally was organized by 'influencer' Jason Preston, a surrogate of long-time Deep State spook Roger Stone. Such characters though have become the New Normal for the New Right for some time: even violent crimes including outright murder can be shrugged off if they're done in the name of advancing the interests of the Party. 

      This is what's supposed to be better than those Commie Demmy-crats, but it very obviously isn't: in fact, it's more of the same. The Democrats had no issue of course exonerating their own confederates in the Scamdemic and had no problem with violent rioters acting in the name of their version of Political Correctness while weaponizing Secret Police Forces to target their own opponents. But that's the point here: we're not supposed to be what the Democrats are. 

      The Postmodern 'Right' in the United States has completely lost its moral compass---largely because the ideologues driving the Movement do not themselves believe in Democracy or Constitutional self-government in general. Despite their overt hostility towards freedom, many on the Right react with Denial, Apathy, or outright support of both the New Right's actions and rhetoric. What can explain this?

     In America, we don't have an Established Church, but that hasn't stopped the Churches from becoming quasi-political institutions by their own initiative. Throughout history, when churches lose their moral authority, they tend to look for earthly messiahs, and seek solutions in the fantasies of Scientism---much like the Christian Nationalists have done today with the Scientism of Big Tech. 

      Apostate Christianity seeking a Messianic Leader; the Red Pill Doctrine of the Alpha Superman and the Scientism of Big Tech today are allied both by their common contempt for humanity and their lust for power to which they believe themselves entitled. It naturally follows from this paradigm that those who commit either legal or moral outrages on humanity become its greatest heroes and its most outstanding specimens. 

      The Messianic Alpha Strongman, backed by the Settled Science, provides a sense of security for those who fear Freedom and Responsibility. This is how so many of the True Believers indifferently can overlook any atrocity that their Leadership commits. For many Churchians, obedience to the New Right is less political support than it is Faith-Based submission; just as for many of the others it is a blind confidence in Social Darwinism, Evolutionary Psychology, Technological Idolatry, etc. 

     The New Right, of course, is neither Conservative nor Christian. It is, as we've said for some time, merely a Reactionary Movement seeking to lead us into the Great Reset on its own terms. If the New Right really were about restoring our Heritage, would they behave in a way contrary to everything our Heritage represents? It wouldn't hurt the True Believers to ask themselves such questions.

     

IT'S DISTRACTION SEASON AGAIN

      Here in the Prozac Nation, the Corporate Media was compelled this weekend to take a hiatus from the usual hero-worship and drama due to (yet another) catastrophic natural disaster. This time, a massive flood swept through Central Texas with literally hundreds of people dead or missing. Both wings of the Uniparty, which have continued together ignoring the scandalous condition of American Flood Control systems for many years now, reacted to the disaster with finger-pointing; and, as usual, offered no solutions to address the issue. In Postmodern America, building things like more prisons, internment camps, domestic espionage networks, and border walls are considered priority infrastructure spending: actual Public Safety, not so much. 

     With the flooding and too many questions (finally) starting to be asked in the wake of passing the Neocons' Budget-Bill, an urgent distraction from Reality became necessary. Military showboating against Iran and Elon Musk's further antics simply weren't enough. So the US Department of Justice obliged with the single most reliable tactic to divert public attention: a juicy sex scandal.

      Sunday Night's announcement that the Justice Department has found nothing on the long-moribund Jeffrey Epstein Scandal has sent the American Social Media scene into a spiraling meltdown. To recap the story a bit for context here: Jeffrey Epstein was a Wall Street/WEF hedge-fund billionaire who sidelined as a Globalist Deep State Operative. He owned a private island in the Carribbean where he ran Black Budget operations of every description, mostly on behalf of the CIA, MI-6, and the Mossad, although personal vendettas among the rich and powerful were no doubt had for a price too. Epstein Island was an international hotbed of pay-to-play Political and Corporate organized crime activities that certain interests preferred not be done under the scrutiny of government authorities or curious journalists. There are other places like this in the world, Epstein's happened to be most notorious though. 

     As a front for all of these crimes, Epstein ran an operation--- something like a billionaires' playground, and kept a number of young women around for that purpose. In a deeply sex-negative culture like the United States, Epstein's actual crimes could get a free pass, but the thought that men might be engaging in heterosexual activities is intolerable to contemporary Americans. Epstein's mistake was keeping it all private instead of following Andrew Tate's strategy of opening it all to public gaze. Part and parcel of a sexually puritanical culture like ours is that two of our main national past-times are voyeurism and IRL sex: Tate understands this, but Epstein didn't. Hence, Tate gets to be a national hero while Epstein died under mysterious circumstances. The Deep State subsequently picked the woman who managed the Island's hostesses as a human sacrifice and the scandal went away as the Media found new lurid stories to latch onto. 

     

      Some on the New Right are screaming that the DOJ's announcement is tantamount to Treason; the Whacko Left is touting a Conspiracy Theory that Trump is covering up because he's implicated in something. To cut through the Noise Machine, let us just examine a few actual realities here:

       1. If there really was anything incriminating about Trump in Epstein's files, his enemies wouldn't have wasted time and money on stupid witch-hunts, impeachments, and Lawfare over ridiculously trivial issues and allegations with nothing but rumors to support them.

      2. Even if there were anything scandalous about Trump, we should all know by now that most of his supporters are borderline paranoid fanatics who wouldn't care anyway.

      3. It's somewhat absurd to imagine that the Deep State would be transparent about anything involving a high-profile operative like Jeffrey Epstein. Let's be realistic: Pam Bondi (former lobbyist for Jeff Bezos and current operative of the Bush Machine); Kash Patel (former Obama Administration Official); and Dan Bongino (a wholly-owned toady of Rupert Murdoch) are part of the Deep State, as were their predecessors. 

     The self-righteous reaction of the American public to the DOJ announcement is more akin to the anger most of them feel when there's a power failure in the middle of one of their OnlyFans broadcasts. They were expecting high-octane titillation and got a blank screen. The scandal will blow over though (just like it did before) as soon as new one pops up to grab public attention. It is rather sad that Americans are less concerned about the dangers of a couple dozen Campfire Girls getting drown in a flood because of our failure to build infrastructure than they are about the possibly than one of those girls might be seen kissing a boy; but that's where Trash Culture has gotten us. 

THE UNIPARTY AND THE NEW MEDIA

      One of the most common myths in Postmodern America is the belief that the Mainstream Media and the Controlled Opposition (i.e. 'Alternative') Media represents two fundamentally different worldviews. This is no more true than the equally potent myth that the two parties are somehow different and don't serve the same interests. The Corporate Oligarchs---who own both the Media and the Government---rely upon the propagation and continuance of these myths to keep up the illusion that America is a vibrant, participatory Democracy. 

      As we enter the Accelerationist Phase of the Great Reset, led by figures like Elon Musk who himself is both a media mogul and WEF operative, we are witnessing today a second revolutionary phase in Media Consolidation. The first occurred mostly from the mid-1990s to the 2010s when Government stripped away legal safeguards against media consolidation and encroached heavily on the symbiotic relationship between itself and the so-called 'free press.' The repeals, contrary to what many believe, were joint-efforts led by both factions of the Uniparty. 

    Through a combination of Lawfare and intimidation, a coordinated assault has been launched against the Mainstream branch of the Corporate Media. Now, if an actual Conservative approach were being taken: i.e. breaking up monopolies, ending Regulatory Capture, and closing things like the Revolving-Door, and reinstating Anti-Propaganda Laws, positive steps would be taken to restore some semblance to a First Amendment again. However, this is not the approach that the Administration is taking.

     In perfect harmony with the blueprint outlined in Mein Kampf Project 2025, the objectives of the Great Reset, and the vision of the Dark Enlightment, the Tech Lords and other interested parties running the current Administration do not seek to terminate media monopolies and restore free-market competition: they seek to take over the Mass-Media and unite it under one aegis. In other words, the Mainstream Media has served its purpose to the Oligarchs and has become expendable. 

       Most of the True Believers choose to remain in blissful ignorance of the fact that the 'news sources' they trust so completely are themselves deeply embedded with the Uniparty and heavily influenced by foreign ideologues, including many dangerous religious cults. 

       Fox News Network, owned by WEF member Rupert Murdoch, has contributed nearly two dozen of its operatives to key positions in the Trump 47 Administration. Murdoch's enterprises are heavily funded by the same autocratic Gulf State regimes visited by Trump and his Corporate entourage last week. 

     The aforementioned Elon Musk, likewise, is heavily indebted the Saudi Monarchy, including a fat payout for a big share in the Twitter hostile takeover. One of Musk's first acts upon this takeover was to appoint more of his and the Saudi royal family's WEF pals to key leadership positions at X. 

     Yet, this is what we're supposed to believe is draining the swamp and restoring press freedom. The fact is that this Administration has merely shifted the labels and is enforcing speech codes and setting up its own disinformation outlets just as aggressively as the previous one did. There has been almost no resistance from Mainstream 'journalists' of course. They long ago sold out any principles that they might have had once and have realistically adjusted themselves to the New Normal. Most Americans likely will do the same. The Patriot Act first and the Scamdemic secondly, demonstrated that Americans are unwilling to fight for anything as arcane as the First Amendment. Still, they'll keep the First Amendment around in spite of its being a dead letter, while the Oligarchs and their paid parrots keep up the Official Narrative of Protecting our Freedoms.