Thursday, January 8, 2026

NSPM-7 AND MINNEAPOLIS

        As we're entering nearly a year of Rule by the Red Pill, the New Order of the Alpha Superman has punctuated its goal of both Global and Domestic dominance over its so-called Beta inferiors with egregious violations of International Law abroad and gunning down protesters now at home. The Head-of-State is planning to initiate the second year of the New Order as he did the first, by reporting to the even higher levels of Alpha Strongmen at the World Economic Forum later this month. 

        The ICE thugs' shooting of a Minneapolis resident has generated much phony outrage from the Controlled Opposition (which, in 2026, is the Democrat Party). They are demanding all sorts of hearings, impeachments, etc. against the figurehead leader of the State Security Police, Kristi Noem. Some have even dusted off the George Floyd analogies; I guess this is Madison Avenue's advice to counter the less-than-successful Charlie Kirk campaign. However, something that came out of the Kirk Affair is conveniently overlooked by the so-called Left: we refer of course to NSPM-7.

       Both Kristi Noem and the White House immediately labelled the shooting an act of self-defense, and accused the victim of engaging in an act of terrorism. The Democrats and critics of ICE have completely ignored the fact that under the re-definition of terrorism outlined by NSPM-7, and implemented in December by the Justice Department's corollary that targets "those expressing 'opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders;" the murder of the Minneapolis protester is now legally a protected Government action, whether morally so, or not. 


       The Democrat wing of the Uniparty and the useless parasites in the Corporate Media have had little to nothing to say about NSPM-7: either when it was signed in September or implemented in December; being too obsessed with glorifying Charlie Kirk in the first case and too obsessed with muh Epstein Files in the second to notice. Needless to say, nobody is bothering to connect the dots between NSPM-7 and ICE's new-found authority to treat opponents of American Immigration Policy as domestic terrorists. After all, they hope to come to power again and use NSPM-7 for their own benefit; hence, politically it's best for now to keep silent about the root causes and focus on the peripheral issues. 

      What's even worse has been the silence---and even applause---from the Churches and the so-called 'Christian Right' over the growing power of the Red Pill Philosophy over this Administration and our culture in general. We've seen over the last year how traditional Catholic websites have turned against Popes and Bishops to embrace the Titanism of Peter Thiel and his tool, J.D. Vance. (We might remind readers here that Vance is only one 80-year old man's heartbeat away from becoming the Supreme Leader of the United States). Even traditional Protestant sites which used to speak out against the dangers of these politicized trends in the Church have apparently gone full Red Pill and started promoting Evo-Psych nonsense about being Alpha 'pack animals' instead belonging to the 'beta herd.' This is a very sad state of affairs because Churches and Christian writers should be the ones speaking out the loudest: and we've seen from History that melding religion with political extremism never ends well.

      As further proof of these trends, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller went on CNN to trumpet the 'success' of our brave xhes in uniform in kidnapping the Venezuelan President and massacring his Palace Guard. Miller practically quoted Red Pill Cultist Rollo Tomassi verbatim stating that “We live in a world that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power. These are the iron laws of the world that have existed since the beginning of time.” This is the Alpha Red Pill philosophy in a nutshell; and a fact that many of the pundits trying desperately to explain the Administration's domestic and foreign policy overlook. The goal of this Administration is not to achieve popular consensus or make Allies: its goal is asserting 'Alpha' dominance. 

     Understood in this light, the consoldiations of power, the flaunting of International Law, the Rule-by-Decree, the unilateral abrogations of treaties, the suppression of dissident, the wealth transfers---all make logical sense. Logical though it may be, it represents an extremely dangerous tendency because the last two world wars and the totalitarian regimes of the 20th Century operated upon exactly the same premises: namely that certain ideologies represented the highest stage of human evolution---by the sheer fact of its power--- and therefore had a right to impose its will anywhere on anybody they saw fit. It's even more dangerous when fake religious mandates are adduced as justification for it. 

      This has been a trend with the Republican Party for a long time. Bush Senior's chortling about a New World Order and the New American Century started the ball rolling and his offspring---who was also deeply allied with Christian Nationalists phrased it in more homespun fashion: "You're either for us or you're for the enemy." Neoconservatism of the Bush School and the Alt-Right of the Red Pills has always been a natural fit. They've come together in today's New Right, which is in the process of building a unified (and permanent) political/religious front

     The murder of protesters and the kidnapping of foreign Presidents also represent a trend initiated by the Neocons beginning with the aforementioned Bush Sr.'s attack on Panamanian sovereignty and his militarization of Police fighting his phony War on Drugs. Meeting no opposition---and even getting encouragement---from both the Democratic Party and the American Public, the last 35 years have culminated in what we saw in Minneapolis and in Venezuela. It's not the end of the trend either, unless Americans stop going along to get along or imagining that they'll vote their way out of it by swapping one side of the Uniparty for the other.



 

           

No comments:

Post a Comment