SOME FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS ON THE CAPTIVE MARKET

        So, following yesterday's announcement that a massive percentage of Global Shipping would be suspended following our Deep State's unilateral declaration that foreign postal services would be responsible for work formerly done by US Customs agencies, several announced today that shipping would resume after exclusive contracts were doled out to third-party independent contractors who would---for a consideration---process the paperwork involved. These contractors mainly include FedEx, DHL, and UPS. 

     Let's see if we can guess what these companies all have in common.

     Surprise, surprise! They are all Strategic Partners of the World Economic Forum. Our totally-committed-to-draining-the-swamp Administration has basically handed over Import and Export controls to Wall Street. Since the pretext for imposing the import policies in the first place was National Security, there's no doubt that plenty of surveillance and data-mining of US consumers will go into the mix as well. 

    Let's see what else they all have in common:

      Isn't it interesting how these grave national issues always seem to lead back to the same people? In DHL's case, the German Government is the top stakeholder. Guess who the current German Chancellor's former official employer was?

        Just remember, though: these Tariffs and International Economic Policies have the sole purpose of making American small businesses stronger and bringing back good-paying American jobs (according to our Corporate Media and the PR Firms). Now that all of the agencies generating economic forecasts and reporting on the economy have been duly purged and replaced by Party Hacks, the Official Narrative will tell us so too. 

     

TIN SOLDIERS AND BIDEN'S COMING

      As we're writing this today, police forces loyal to the American Uniparty are emulating their counterparts in Canada, Australia, and across Europe and crushing protests violently under the pretenses of combating anti-Semitism. The Media Scum, quite predictably, discreetly have been ignoring the fact that anti-Zionist Jews are being rounded up along with the other protesters. In Germany, the SS violently suppressed a demonstration outside the Reichstag. The German Reich, under Chancellor Scholz has actually locked up more Jews than anytime since the 1940s, but Western journalists care about as much about that as they do the wholesale murder of their brother-newsmen at the hands of the Zionists. These things are, however, in keeping with the World Economic Forum's Agenda this year, which focused on the need of Deep States under their control to put down dissent. 

    Therefore, it was a major surprise yesterday to see an article actually appear in the Controlled Opposition Media outlining a traditionally Conservative approach to the Campus Protests. The article must have been downvoted into oblivion by our new Woke Conservatives, since it seems to have been archived. The author is man named Christopher Roach who writes for a number Neocon publications: it's astounding in today's atmosphere of Groupthink among the Right that anyone let it be published. 

       Roach correctly points out that "Our foreign policy towards Israel should be subject to debate and accepted as a target of protest as much as anything else. Suggestions that such views are beyond the pale and warrant expulsion simply because they are unpopular are impossible to square with the First Amendment and more general American principles of free speech. There have been many overwrought and dishonest criticisms of recent campus protests, but they do not appear more violent or more sinister than other protests of recent years." 

      Exactly. Ever since the Bush Administration, the American Right seems to have swallowed the idea that egregious violations of the 1st Amendment (and the Bill of Rights generally) are only bad when the Democrats do it. Such thinking has led to the absurdity of positions like we're seeing reflected in the standard Neocon approach to criticism of the Zionist Regime. Up until a few months ago, the paid pundits on the Right were howling about Cancel Culture and Speech Codes at American Universities (as if these things were something that only started yesterday); today that whole Official Counter-Narrative has gone and the Right stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the Academic Left deciding what is and isn't acceptable speech. That really has been the Neocon position all along, witness the fact that the Right has done nothing for decades (and are still doing nothing) to fight the diversity policies discriminating against Americans but are moving at breakneck speed to make certain that nobody speaks out against the Globalist Agenda.

   Roach also noted that minor detail, which has been overlooked completely by the so-called Opposition: "The current protests are a fraction of the size and scale surrounding the BLM protests of 2020. The class of those vilified has shrunk too. BLM attacked White people as a whole and called for violence against the police; the current protests are aimed at Zionists, that is, supporters of Jewish nationalism in the Jews’ historic homeland. In addition to violence, there was also a lot of nasty language associated with BLM. Many of the critics of the Gaza protests apparently didn’t notice the criminality, thuggery, and genocidal language of Leftist protests until their own group was in the crosshairs."

     Roach also points out the glaring hypocrisy of the Neocons: "For many years, Ben Shapiro and others on the neocon right professed pride in their hard-headedness, summarizing their worldview as 'Facts don’t care about your feelings.' So it is a little surprising to hear from him and his fellow travelers how terrible it is that Israel’s supporters have to endure listening to ideas they find offensive, disagreeable, and 'hateful.' If Israel and its policies are so great, they should be able to win the battle of public opinion with facts, logic, and protests of their own." 

     An accurate assessment of the Conservative approach contrasted with what passes for Conservativism in the 21st Century. Shapiro's maxim 'Facts don't care about your feelings' has become more or less the motto of the whole movement; although a more precise interpretation of the statement would be 'Your feelings are irrelevant to our definition of the facts.' Understood in that light, Shapiro's position is logically consistent despite being morally abhorrent. Acceptance of this creed has led less to hard-headedness as it has to hard-heartedness; thus so-called Conservatives, for example, have no problem accepting the fact of a few dozen Corporate Robber-Barons outsourcing entire communities' economic base as justifiable against the feelings of a few thousand people being reduced to poverty and displacement. In the case of Israel, the fact that the Zionists and their WEF Corporate Masters covet the resources under Palestinian control trumps the feelings of millions being slaughtered and enslaved systematically; and if we're all good Conservatives we simply should look the other way and give thanks in our Megachurches that it's all happening to somebody else for our benefit.

     Roach actually displays some unusual insight (that is, unusual by the standards of today's Conservatism) into the sociological factors among today's younger citizens: "We should try to understand what is happening in the world around us. People oriented towards practical matters like money, power, and personal advancement often do not understand those of a more romantic sensibility. While many people attend college to get credentials so that they can get ahead, others are motivated by a desire to live a life of meaning and sacrifice in service to a cause. We live in an age with fewer opportunities for heroism and adventure than prior generations. We are not in the middle of a grand struggle like World War II; no manifest destiny is afoot, and we do not even have much of a space program anymore. Most of our struggles are prosaic and personal: pursuing careers, establishing wealth, navigating indifferent bureaucracies, and amusing ourselves with travel and restaurants."

   This is a topic worthy of further discussion. What Roach vaguely, though correctly, grasps is that Postmodern Culture has sapped the vitality of our traditional culture and turned the national psyche away from the ideals of living for cause greater than oneself into an inward, introspective and narcissistic orientation of living for oneself above the good of the community as a whole. This shift is based on another Neoconservative myth, which they term rugged individualism: an idea that we debunked here already. Postmodern Conservatism celebrates the Narcissism of our culture as much as the Left does and that more than anything else is accelerating the downfall of our Republic. 

    During the Jacobin chaos of the French Revolution, Marquis de Sade authored a 'utopian' novel where he predicted that republicanism would lead eventually to a society of mutual exploitation. De Sade's fantasies sound eerily similar to many of the Manosphere's Red Pilled theories where this is reduced beyond economics into sexual matters where everyone becomes the sexual property of anyone strong (or 'Alpha') enough to take it. De Sade has been criticized as a misogynist, but more accurately, he hated all of humanity much like New World Order elites and their flying monkeys on the fake Right do. Unwittingly, de Sade gave us the blueprint of where immoral and godless republicanism leads to when drawn to its logical conclusions. One of our Founding Fathers, John Adams, understood the same fatal tendency and said that "Our system is designed for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the Government of any other." The Postmodern Right's philosophies of "Facts don't care about your feelings" and "Rugged Individualism" reflect de Sade's vision a lot more than they do Adams'. 

    As Conservatives, we must reject this fatal tendency to subvert our Constitutional Rights no matter whether the threat comes from the Left or the Right. The Bill of Rights was premised upon the ideal stated in our Declaration of Independence that Rights are inalienable, bestowed upon us by our Creator, and not subject to the whims of Governments---which are wholly human inventions. These Rights therefore are an absolute---not simply defined as whatever those in power permit us to have. These Rights don't cease to exist because a group comes into power and presumes to nullify them; hence the only Just Government is one that one that upholds and recognizes them. Since national policies are complex, such Rights can only be maintained in an atmosphere of free discussion and free access to information.

    

    

     

THE WEST'S WAR ON FREE SPEECH

      Our friends over at the blog Vulture of Critique posted a pair of really informative articles during the weekend which highlighted several newsworthy stories which our Corporate Media has swept under the rug behind the Middle East and Trump Trial distractions. There have been further revelations about the extent of the outright lies sold to us during the Scamdemic, questions about the suspicious Maui Wildfire (which has completely fallen off the MSM newscycle), Israeli political bribery rampant in America, and further shenanigans of the WEF. 

    In light of events in the Middle East, we ought to remind ourselves of the consequences of the COVID-19 National Panic Attack before blindly accepting the Official Narrative and acting before thinking. I realize that, to most Americans, 2020 and 2021 are about as remote as the era of Julius Caesar, but we're still living with the fallout of vast personal and economic devastation, extensive expansions of Corporate-Political power, and rising deaths and debilitation from the unsafe Loyalty Vaxx. All of that was for nothing: absolutely nothing. 

   Actually, even then we should have remembered the consequences of the 9/11 aftermath and how our reaction and response ended up doing more damage than the actual terrorist attacks did. We're still living with the consequences of those too; and, if we listen to the pro-Israel propaganda flowing from Corporate mouthpieces in government and media, we're evidently no safer from the terrorist threat now than we were then. 

   With the offensive in Gaza bogging down and Ukraine about to collapse, the Deep States across the West are beginning to implement further crackdowns on dissent and opposition. This shouldn't be surprising since, in January, their masters at the World Economic Forum made "combating disinformation" 2023's top priority. 

  Dr. Reiner Fullmich, a German physician who led a courageous legal challenge against the Scamdemic, was kidnapped and extradited to Germany by the Gestapo under the same flimsy pretenses used to silence Julian Assange. Germany was one of the first European States both to ban pro-Palestinian protests and speech generally. They were also among the most slavish of EU countries backing the Ukraine conflict---going so far as to seize Russian 'assets' including all of their media outlets. Klaus Schwab's homeland, of course, is no stranger to New World Order-type ideological movements or police-state authoritarianism. After the Second World War, Germany was divided into two zones: one governed by ex-Nazis and the other by Soviet Communists. After they reunified in 1989, they took the lead in dominating the European Union and have been in complete solidarity with the Beltway Deep State ever since. 

    France, Poland, and other EU/NATO lapdogs aren't far behind Germany, but the rest of the Anglosphere is gearing up for some major moves against Freedom of Speech and Press Freedom. That isn't to suggest, of course, that these things haven't been decline here for many years already. New Zealand arrogated to itself extensive powers over dissent even before the Scamdemic began (and yes, the threat of terrorism was used an excuse then too). In Canada, Tienanmen Trudeau's bloody suppression of the 2022 Anti-Scamdemic protests and subsequent censorship laws have already broken the backs of much of the Canadian resistance. 

   The Australian Deep State---which has been assuming illegal encroachments on Free Speech for the last several years on a local basis is preparing to codify all of these usurpations into a national law. Alongside of this proposal is a new law which would ban parochial schools as independent entities. "The latest such proposals, worked out by the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), seek to eliminate the exemptions to the country’s discrimination laws which allow religious schools to expel students, fire teachers, and turn down applicants based on their sexuality, relationship status, and pregnancy." Amazing how the Christian and Conservative Media outlets in the United States seem to have overlooked that story---especially since they seem so deeply concerned with the Rights of Jews these days, one would think that attacks on Christians would elicit some sort of outrage. But then again, these are foreign Christians. "I got mine, sux to be you," sums up American Christian Conservatives' attitudes towards just about anyone without lobbying dollars to refresh their commitment to Christian charity. 

  Meanwhile, over in Good King Chuck's Jolly Old England, the hammer of censorship is about to drop hard. The blog Electronic Intifada posted a good backstory of the ongoing collusion between so-called British Liberals and so-called British Conservatives to bring this about. The Manchester Guardian reported today that a leaked document from the British Deep State seeks to expand their already tight rein on dissent---without even bothering to get nominal approval from Charles' Rump Parliament. 

    The US has already been experiencing much of the 'soft censorship' that we saw during the Scamdemic. Governments and Corporations are issuing gag orders or dismissals of pro-Palestinian functionaries; the Media is circulating bans on certain topics; Academia, Incorporated is shutting down pro-Palestinian student organizations and banning demonstrations; the Tech Lords are blocking or shadow-banning certain hashtags, etc. Both political parties are engaging in and encouraging Cancel Culture at its worst. 

   In our system of Inverted Totalitarianism, the Deep State ideally manages both sides of a political debate (only two positions are permitted) as part of the Strategy of Tension which keeps the populace divided and fearful and therefore powerless.  They tolerate some actual dissent to give the illusion that Free Speech exists, though they carefully marginalize anyone who's off-script as an extremist or kook too far away from the 'Consensus' to take seriously. However, occasionally, a crisis will be manufactured of such urgency that it requires both factions to present a unified front. In such cases, actual dissent must be suppressed because the topics such dissent raises are considered too dangerous to be discussed. 

   This happened after 9/11 and during the Scamdemic and is shaping up to happen again over the Middle East Crisis. It is part of the reason why people like Assange and Fullmich are sitting in jail right now---as a warning to others of what can happen to those getting too close to Third Rail Topics. 

   Both so-called 'Blue States' and so-called 'Red States' are already criminalizing dissent to various degrees. Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib barely escaped a formal Congressional sanction for arguing---as a Legislator has a right to do---for Palestinian Rights. The Democrats voted unanimously against the sanction in the end: although the White House pointedly denounced her position as "disgraceful and repugnant." New Jersey Democratic Congressman Josh Gottheimer said, "It sickens me that while Israelis clean the blood of their family members shot in their homes, they believe Congress should strip U.S. funding to our democratic ally and allow innocent civilians to suffer," while New York Democrat Richie Torres chimed in that "U.S. aid to Israel is and should be unconditional, and never more so than in this moment of critical need. Shame on anyone who glorifies as 'resistance' the largest single-day mass murder of Jews since the Holocaust. It is reprehensible and repulsive." 

   Both Gottheimer and Torres received well over six figures in campaign contributions from AIPAC in 2022, but somehow both the MSM and the Controlled Opposition Media overlooked that small detail. It doesn't suit the Narrative of either the DNC or RNC to point out how much Israeli money is flowing into each others' campaigns. 

  The Biden/Harris Junta, despite their depiction in the Controlled Opposition Press as appeasers of Hamas, quietly announced over the weekend an initiative to activate the already-weaponized Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security to expand Domestic Espionage at all schools and engage the campus police forces (many of which are private security contractors) to assist their efforts. Quite coincidentally, only a few months before the Gaza Uprising, the Junta officially launched a controversial program called the National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism; which drew some criticism from the pro-Israel lobby for not conflating anti-Semitism with anti-Zionism strongly enough. 

   My suspicion is that we're only seeing the tip of the proverbial iceberg when it comes to further Censorship and Domestic Espionage efforts (let's not forget that Israeli technology goes into much of the software that our Government and Tech Lords employ for both purposes). Besides, the Oligarchs at the WEF want more control of online content, and their opinion is the only one that really matters to Western Governments. 

   

   

AMERICAN MASCULINITY IN DECLINE

   During the Summer of 1945, President Harry Truman announced to the nation that the Second World War had officially ended; and that the menace of global Fascist tyranny had been neutralized. The task of rebuilding and returning to normal lay ahead. Truman reached out to the Allied Powers who'd shared in the mission to help rebuild. The international situation was still very unstable; but the general mood of the nation was upbeat. While in the midst of a severe economic downturn, the attack on Pearl Harbor destroyed most of military capability; but we'd come together, rallied, and came back to win a two-front war within four years.

   But somewhere between then and now, the American people collectively lost it. The cracks in our society began showing not long after the war. It first really became apparent during the Korean War. Military veterans of WW2 remarked that the quality of personnel had declined radically from just a few years before. In 1950, the American Army was in full retreat: the North Koreans had beaten us down to a mere beachhead and were poised to push us off the Peninsula. Had General MacArthur not come out of retirement to execute a brilliant military maneuver, it would have concluded in a massive defeat. 

   Social scientists and medical professionals also saw ominous signs. As early as 1948, psychiatrist Theodore Reik published Masochism in Modern Man, were he noted a sharp increase in masochistic and submissive tendencies appearing in postwar male subjects. "It is important to note" he writes, "that masochism as a perversion is rare among women while it certainly is the prevailing perversion among men... it is the most frequent and the most significant sexual perversion in our society and as such determines the sexual behavior of innumerable representatives of our civilization. The masochistic attitude is of still greater importance because it proves the possibilities of cultural utilization of the deviation."

    Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, the weakness of postmodern men was becoming alarmingly apparent. To their credit, the Mass-Media of the day tried to counter it with heroic cultural archetypes. The patriot, the Western hero, the soldier, policemen and detectives, secret agents, and astronauts were---along with the strong modern family man were held up as ideals. But the ideal and the reality were becoming widely separated. Advertisers noted that the primary audience for these shows were American women. They were obviously seeking what they didn't find in their own lives. Psychiatrist Frank Caprio noted in the 1950s that: "While modern man is more sex conscious than ever before, he is still a sexual ignoramus...many men are egocentric and uninformed and are anything but 'God's Gift to women'. Their ignorance {and indifference} towards the average woman's emotional make-up and of the proper sex technique is colossal."

    Postwar social scientists saw especial concerns here, because most of them had spent the war itself engaged in research of the psychological and social conditions in Axis countries. It really became apparent through these studies that nearly all of the Axis leaders were perverts and sexual degenerates of long standing. Some who dug a little deeper learned that other totalitarian and radical movements had the same tendencies well-represented among their own leaders. There was a strong consensus that sexual dysfunction and attraction to authoritarianism had at least a statistical correlation. But even more troubling was the fact that the same weaknesses and degeneracy among the American male population manifesting in the 1950s and 1960s were noted by European scientists during the 1920s and 1930s. Wilhelm Stekel, who lived in the heartland of where the Nazi Movement began, wrote in 1927 that among German men: "Sexual inadequacy is increasing to an alarming degree and impotence has come to be a disorder associated with the rise of modern civilization (i.e. the situation in Weimar Germany after WW1)...The percentage of relatively impotent men cannot be placed too high. In my experience hardly half of {postwar German} men enjoy normal potency."

    

   When the U.S. entered the Vietnam War, the problems noted by military leaders in Korea had become infinitely worse. In WW2, American military units were characterized by effective teamwork; in Vietnam the responsibility fell mostly on the individual soldiers who able or willing to do the work. Needless to say, this had a terrible effect on morale and discipline. Domestically, this was made even worse by widespread Draft evasion and an open revolt among American men against anything even remotely resembling traditional masculinity. Men compensated for their growing effeminacy by advocating for 'free love' and shirking familial responsibilities. The archetype of the American became a slovenly, self-centered, drug-addicted loser sponging off society and giving nothing in return. 

   By the 1970s, American women joined in the general decline. Most of them until then had rejected Feminism which was always promoted by the defectives among their gender. By then though American men had sunk to the point where they were willing to let women take over their social responsibilities. We've never recovered from this decline and it's highly unlikely that we will. It's interesting to note that modern so-called 'Conservatives' look back to men of the 50s as role models while modern so-called 'Liberals' find the 60s male appealing. They are really two sides of the same coin. 

     It's difficult to decipher exactly what led to this decline. The wars we fought that we fought between 1898 and 1945 cost about 400,000 of our best men dead and another 880,000 wounded, as well as another 80,000 missing. That's a huge toll to take on a nation's best men. Consider that 3/4 of these numbers were from World War II alone. Unlike previous warfare which consumed a lot of cannon fodder, modern warfare calls for the sacrifice of the best and most able men. The conditions that Stekel had described in Germany likewise occured after the Germans had lost a whopping 15% ---about one in six---of its young men during WW1. 

   Another factor to consider is that family men who served in WW2 were absent from home on average of from 3-6 years. That's about double the time absent during the wars with Spain, WW1, and some of the other conflicts of the period. During the 1898-1941 period, even a professional military man was rarely away from home on the battlefront for longer than six months. The situation during WW2 left a lot of children de facto fatherless during their most formative years. We can well imagine that the transition from extended military service to traditional family wasn't very smooth for many of these fathers. 

   While an interesting theory, it doesn't tell the whole picture. The fact is we didn't see anything like this kind of an impact on the generations who followed the American Revolution, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, or the US Civil War earlier. Those wars were not only costly; they were fought mostly on American soil and impacted the average American even more than the later ones did. In fact, they seem to have had the opposite effect and produced men even more virile and robust than before. 

   Other possible explanations include other environmental factors such as the proliferation of narcotics, less healthy diets, environmental pollution, etc. Those aren't sufficient explanations however. As noted in the psychological abstracts, the decline effected men much heavier than women in the 50s and 60s; and it really wasn't until the 70s and 80s that women were taking on the same defects. Actually, even during that period, it was mostly reactionary and it's been from the 90s and later that we've seen a parallel rejection of femininity. If the causes were organic, it would have impacted both genders simultaneously---which is not what happened. 

  Another theory is that masculinity declined through defective education. The Long March of Cultural Marxism seized our institutions mostly through the schools during this period. But this explanation, too, is inadequate. Just like Radical Feminism, Cultural Marxism could have been stopped if it had met with even a shred of resistance. Instead, American men mostly capitulated to it and even encouraged it. Actual Communism is friendlier to traditional masculinity than the latent homosexuality of the American 'woke' Left is today.

    What is responsible for the decline and fall of American Masculinity? All of the theories proposed so far are doubtless contributing factors, but none alone actually explain the root cause. It would be interesting to consider opinions on the subject, because understanding the fundamental cause is a first step towards fixing it. Looking back to our ancestors' examples isn't enough at this point. Younger men can't relate to it and the sociopolitical infrastructure doesn't support it. Nonetheless, it's a problem that can't be ignored any longer. As of this writing, 1 in 8 American men under the age of 30 are clinically impotent and about 1 in 6 identify as not exclusively heterosexual. Suicides and narcotics overdoses rank higher than most diseases and accidents as a cause of male mortality. Recent studies indicate that high percentages of American men don't believe in God or believe that life has a purpose, have no interest in starting families or raising children, and consider work of any kind meaningless. It's obvious that we can't sustain this kind of a decline. But how do we find our way out? That answer is not so obvious. 

   

HORST WESSEL RISES FROM THE GRAVE

    A little over 90 years ago in the Weimar Republic, a low-level Nazi Party thug named Horst Wessel was working at his side-job in Berlin as a small-time pimp when he got involved in an altercation in his apartment with one of his escort's former employers, whose name was Albrecht Hohler. The argument became heated, Wessel went for his gun, and Hohler shot him in self-defense. Wessel was wounded and taken to the hospital where he died a few days later. The Medical Examiner ruled that Wessel died of blood poisoning contracted from unsanitary surgical procedures. 

   Hohler had once been active in the German Communist Party (interesting how Communists and Nazis always seem to be well-represented in the criminal class). Wessel had worked for the future Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels and Goebbels was never the type to let a good crisis go to waste. Even in 1930, Goebbels---whose media outreach was heavily funded by German Corporate interests---turned Wessel into a martyr. Everybody in the Weimar Republic soon knew who Horst Wessel and Albrecht Hohler were; with outpourings of grief over the 'injustice' of Wessel's 'murder' and demands for Hohler's scalp. Jay Baird, a Weimar historian of the last century, wrote: "These reports, reminiscent of wartime communiques, asserted that Wessel had been struck down in the flower of his youth, the victim of a 'cowardly attack by a pack of murder-crazed degenerate Communist bandits.' In contravention of every moral standard, these 'subhumans,' having failed to kill the innocent Wessel, next undertook to invade the noble precincts of Friedreichshain Hospital and dispatch the noble hero there."

    Attendees at Wessels' funeral included Hermann Goering---then the leader of the Nazi Party in the Weimar Congress---and one of the sons of Kaiser Wilhelm; among numerous other German and foreign dignitaries. Hitler spoke at the even bigger ceremony dedicating a monument to Wessel. Public pressure lead to Hohler's indictment for murder; and in consequence of considerable Nazi intimidation of the judge and jury, Hohler was found guilty and sentenced to six years' imprisonment. In 1933, after the Nazis had seized power, Hohler was broken out of jail by a lynch mob and murdered in the streets. Meanwhile, films were made of Wessel's life, plazas, streets, and other public places renamed for him, and a song about him was widely sung.

   Is any of this sounding familiar?

   It should. The George Floyd death/Derek Chauvin trial was a replay of what happened in 1930 Berlin---right down to the same tactics. In 1930, the Nazis were preparing to take over the German Government; in 2020, the Corporatists were planning to take over ours; and both sides made a 'martyr' out of the first blockhead they could find who was stupid enough to get himself killed while out committing crimes. 

  Americans have been mentally softened-up enough to accept miscarriages of justice like yesterday's Chauvin Trial through a long-running series of dumbed-down Courtroom Dramas and sensationalized (and politicized) real-life trials. The Weimar Republic had their share of those too. But republican self-rule had only existed in Germany since 1919; and mass-media and weaponized propaganda techniques were still new technologies. The Germans could argue that they didn't know any better; on the other hand, we should have learned from their mistakes and we don't have that excuse. 

   So yesterday, many Conservative pundits were denouncing the Chauvin Verdict. As much as I like Tucker Carlson, he sometimes exasperates me when he says things like this: 

  I fully agree that politics should play no role in jury deliberations. But, recall that politics and money have been hijacking our now barely-functioning legal system since the Rodney King Case. That happened in 1991; and every election cycle we heard 'conservatives' vowing to implement Tort Reform, reforms in legal procedures, putting a stop to the media sensationalism, etc. And all of us Conservatives who voted for them are still waiting for them to take any action whatsoever. Pundits like Tucker Carlson really need to go back and review their old news archives, because travesties like the Chauvin Trial aren't a phenomenon that just started in America last year. 

  The Democrats don't want reform because Media and Trial Lawyer special interests hire them to see that all that free publicity goes on. The Republicans don't (really) want reform because advertising interests hire them to make sure nothing interferes with MSM ratings during these sick proceedings. The short-term profits that all of these opportunists raked in for 30 years have had the long-term effect of bringing us to the point where genuinely evil men with evil intentions can turn thugs into saints; break innocent men and women; intimidate judges and juries; and do all of this more or less at will. 

     The Chauvin Trial didn't prove that the Judiciary is moving to a point where it is going to be held hostage to special interests. What it proved is that we've already reached that point. When we were still in the process of reaching it, too many Americans were content to look the other way. I can recall during the O.J. Simpson and Jodi Arrias Trials hearing of people putting bets on the outcome. I've seen numerous cases of lesser-known people railroaded by some glory-hungry prosecutor who wanted to make an example of somebody. There have been several others simply manufactured like the Duke LaCrosse Case and the Penn State Football Scandals. Interested parties laughed all the way to the bank; let's see how much laughing they want to do when the Courts end up in the hands of real ideologues governed by mob rule (which they inevitably will). 

    Most Conservatives sadly, are going to go on in denial and tell themselves that  the Chauvin Trial is going to be the last chapter in some disgraceful episode. Of course, none of them are going to think of the suffering plight of Officer Chauvin; just like there was nothing done when Chauvin was prevented by the Tech Oligarchs from raising funds online for his own defense. They are deluding themselves, as usual. Our once-great legal system has been in decline for a long time and we haven't hit bottom yet. The Third Branch of Government is dying. The Whacko Left Wing wants to let it die so that they can 'reform' it with their own crackpots posing as judges. The Junta seems content to keep the system in place and employ political and financial pressure to rig it to an even greater degree. Either way, the outcome is going to be disastrous and the Courts are going to be, from now on, simply public spectacles employed by the Elites either to give the illusion of legality to their plots; or to disgrace perceived enemies of the State. 

   I'm only going to remark in closing that God---as believed in by any credible religion or philosophy---can't possibly be evaluating America and Americans in general in a very favorable light right now. God is one Judge that no one is going to escape and I think that would be prudent for us as a Society to think very carefully about how our current standards of Justice align with His. 

   

   

REMEMBERING THE HEROES OF JULY 20, 1944

   Seventy-five years ago today, Americans across the country retrieved their morning newspapers and were greeted with headlines similar to this one:

   After about a year's planning and a few aborted attempts, elements within the German Military nearly succeeded bringing off a coup against the Nazi Regime. Hitler and several German officers were conducting a strategy meeting in a bunker in Poland. One of these officers, Col. Count von Stauffenberg, smuggled in a briefcase containing a time-bomb; which he planted next to Hitler's position. Von Stauffenberg left the meeting on a pretext and the charge exploded. Hitler, however, was not killed because someone had moved the deadly briefcase, unaware of its contents during the intervening moments. 

   The coup ultimately failed and sadly the heroes involved in this noble mission largely have been forgotten in the West. Attempts by the Alt-RINOs/Red Pills to rehabilitate the Third Reich and the disdain of Whacko Left-Wing Academia for dead white males have caused this anniversary to pass all but unnoticed outside of Germany. 

   What is interesting to me is how many of the conspirators were motivated by respect for a Higher Authority than that of the State. Major-General Henning von Tresckow, who was the leader of the coup attempt was an officer on the Russian Front. Like many others, he revolted against the regime when he learned first-hand of Nazi atrocities in the East. The day after the plot failed, von Tresckow killed himself with a grenade, fearing that Gestapo torture would lead him to expose other conspirators. He said before his death to an aide:

   "The whole world will vilify us now, but I am still totally convinced that we did the right thing. Hitler is the archenemy not only of Germany but of the world. When, in few hours' time, I go before God to account for what I have done and left undone, I know I will be able to justify what I did in the struggle against Hitler. God promised Abraham that He would not destroy Sodom if only ten righteous men could be found in the city, and so I hope for our sake God will not destroy Germany. No one among us can complain about dying, for whoever joined our ranks put on the shirt of Nessus. A man's moral worth is established only at the point where he is ready to give his life in defense of his convictions."

 

   Hitler learned of von Tresckow's involvement in the coup a few months later; and in a rage, ordered his remains exhumed and thrown to the dogs.  "I cannot understand how people can still call themselves Christians and not be furious adversaries of Hitler's regime,"  the General said in 1943. 

   Count Claus von Stauffenberg came from an aristocratic family in the former German Province of Suabia. Stauffenberg at first supported the Nazis, but according to his biographers, began a growing disillusion with the regime through a crisis of faith. Stauffenberg was a devout Catholic and the horrors of Kristalnacht woke him to the government's true aims and intentions. By 1943, he was convinced of his duty to humanity and introduced to the another anti-Nazi, General Friedrich Olbricht (of whom we will say more presently). Stauffenberg is credited by all as the dynamic force within the movement; as witnessed by his willingness to carry out the assassination personally. Baron Axel von dem Bussche, a conspirator who survived the war, stated that Stauffenberg told him plainly just before the coup that: "I am committing high treason with all means at my disposal. I am justified by the right under natural law to defend millions of people's lives from the criminal aggression of Hitler."

   Stauffenberg was captured in Berlin when the coup collapsed and was shot without a trial. The Nazis exacted cruel revenge on his family. A word here should be said about Stauffenberg's friend and aide, Lt. Werner von Haeften, also a Suabian aristocrat, who assisted Stauffenberg in his undertakings against Hitler.

 

    Von Haeften was captured with Stauffenberg and put before the same firing-squad. When the orders were given to fire, von Haeften jumped in front of von Stauffenberg taking the bullets meant for his friend. Such was the caliber of men who stood up to the Nazis.

   The aforementioned Major-General Friederich Olbricht was also a man of deep principle and personal courage, although little is known of his personal life. General Olbricht however was known to be a republican on principle. Unlike many of his fellow-conspirators, General Olbricht was not from the aristocracy, but the son of a fairly distinguished professor of Mathematics. He was also one of the few military officers who politically supported the Weimar Republic and were retained during the Third Reich.

  

  What we do know of Olbricht's character can be deduced by a few anecdotes about him. In 1934, he refused to take the Loyalty Oath to Adolf Hitler on the grounds that his duty was to the German People as a whole and not to one man as an individual. For some reason, this act of insubordination was overlooked. When Hitler was purging the military leadership in 1938, Olbricht again defied Hitler by testifying in the defense of Baron von Fritsch, who was falsely accused of homosexual rape. Olbricht was shot at the same time as von Stauffenberg and von Haeften and his family buried him in a church. It's unknown what his religious convictions were; but General Olbricht seemed strongly motivated by a desire for human liberty and human rights. 

  During the subsequent investigations to the coup, it was learned that Olbricht intended to arrest Gestapo Chief Heinrich Himmler and put him on trial. Following Hitler's example with von Tresckow, the furious Himmler had Olbricht's remains exhumed and thrown into a crematorium. 

  When Olbricht was commanding the 24th Infantry Division on the Russian Front, he received a Chief-of-Staff named Col. Albrecht Mertz von Quirnheim. Von Quirnheim was of the Bavarian aristocracy and his family were connected socially to the von Stauffenberg family. When Olbricht was sent back to Berlin to command the Reserve Army, von Quirnheim was sent back with him. Ordinarily, von Quirnheim would have taken command of the Division; but he had offended Nazi Governors Alfred Rosenberg and Erich Koch by publicly denouncing their inhumane treatment of civilians. 

  

  When Olbricht was captured, von Quirnheim rallied a desperate attempt to free him and bring the coup to a successful conclusion. Unfortunately, he too was captured and shot with the others. Like the Stauffenbergs, the von Quirnheim family suffered terribly from the vengeful Nazis. 

  And Nazi vengeance didn't stop there. The coup attempt's failure convinced Hitler and his fanatical followers of their own invincibility and the aftermath of the attempt was a wholesale orgy of bloodletting wherein the Nazis had free rein over anyone they hated for any reason. 

  Historians can quibble over whether the coup attempt was 'too little, too late' but I'm inclined to be charitable and say 'better late than never.' All of these men had risked themselves more than once in opposing the regime while the majority sat by and said nothing. Given the character and infrastructure of the Nazi Regime, a viable coup attempt was not something which could be organized overnight. The failure of the coup happened not because of principled men like we've described here; but because many of the conspirators were not motivated by the same high principles and saw it as opportunity for political advancement; or to end the war honorably; or, in some cases, to ameliorate their own culpability in the inevitable upcoming war-crimes trials. None of that detracts from the honor of the true heroes of July 20. Let us hope that they will never be forgotten. 

   

ANOTHER REASON TO BUY AMERICAN

     The US Justice Department announced that a Senior Manager of Volkswagen USA pled guilty in Federal Court today to charges of Criminal Conspiracy against the US Government; Wire Fraud; and Violations of the Clean Air Act. Five other VW executives are on trial in absentia for roughly the same offenses; but are believed to have fled to Germany.

       Oliver Schmidt, a German national, was arrested earlier this year after investigators discovered that Volkswagen diesel engines were being equipped with an emissions detection software that also detected emissions testing equipment and falsified the results. The investigation that Schmidt was behind this scheme and that knowingly misrepresented VW engines to Federal and State regulators. The DOJ estimated that unwitting consumers lost around $150 million.

       Whatever objections many may have with the EPA, CARB, and the Clean Air Act in general, it certainly doesn't justify foreign corporations coming here and violating laws that American corporations have to follow. Schmidt's actions were obviously designed to gain unfair competitive advantages over domestic producers.

       For its part, Volkswagen is employing the leverage of its considerable US advertising clout to keep the Corporate Media from reporting the scandal. The Justice Department, however, has issued a warrant for a manager of Audi, and believe that VW, Audi, and Porsche were all equipping diesel vehicles with the same illegal software. Giovanni Pamio of Audi was arrested in Munich and is awaiting extradition to the US on the same charges as Schmidt. The official narrative is, however, is that this was the handiwork of "a few rogue engineers."  Yet, behind the scenes, VW has agreed to pay over $4 billion in federal fines.

        Hopefully this will lead to import bans against these companies. The EU countries rarely ever face any consequences for these kinds of behaviors and it is time for that to change. While the Deep State was swift to impose embargoes and sanctions on other countries, EU offenders are usually given a fine and the whole affair swept under the rug.

        This policy seems to be changing under Trump. European media pundits are genuinely shocked that the US is throwing their executives in jail and Volkswagen's official reports to European stock exchanges indicate that they didn't expect much more than a slap on the wrist. No wonder the Elites over there hate Trump. They don't get the wink and a nod that they've gotten under previous administrations.

           The clear message that Trump and Sessions are sending here is that if Corporate CEOs want to play in the 'swamp', they're going to get drained along with the rest.

 

       

        

      
      

      

ALPHA ALT-RIGHT LEADER RUNS AWAY FROM JEWISH GIRL

      Readers may recall a story we've been following since last December about Red Pill leader Andrew Anglin and the anti-Semitic harassment campaign he waged against the Gersh family of Whitefish, Montana. We last encountered this story in April, when a consortium of lawyers filed charges against Anglin for Invasion of Privacy and violating Montana's Anti-Intimidation Act.

       So it appears now that Anglin himself is intimidated. Attorneys for the Gersh Family have been unable---after three months---to locate Anglin and serve him with official papers. Yes, Anglin is still spouting off his hatreds on The Daily Stormer. His disciples---all alleged victims of Jewish economic oppression---have managed to come up with over $150,000 in spare change to donate to his legal defense fund.

       But where Anglin actually is physically, no one seems to know. Or at least nobody who does know is telling.

        It doesn't seem to occur to Anglin's minions that his actions are quite at variance with what he preaches at The Daily Stormer, An avowed White Supremacist and Red Pill MGTOW fleeing in terror from a Jewish girl's threats is hardly the sort of thing one would expect from a manly Alpha leader. But the story gets even more interesting.

        After Interior Secretary Zinke put a stop to Anglin's activities in Whitefish, Columbus Alive did a profile story on Anglin on February 8th. The article contains this interesting passage: "Anglin's current whereabouts remain unknown. Citing FBI sources and Anglin's social media activity, a November, 2016 Huffington Post article believed him to be residing in Germany."

        How about that? If that story is true, it would mean that Anglin was inciting Troll Storms, Harassment Campaigns, and even an armed Skinhead march on Whitefish while safely out of the country to avoid any conflict or suffer any consequences himself.

          But that is what we've come to expect from these phonies. Vox Day, Matt Forney, and Ramzpaul are among many provocateurs who foment problems in America while hiding out in Europe. And they funnel through the Internet European extremist ideologies that they palm off as 'Americanism'.

         

       

         

      

WHAT THE FRENCH ELECTION REALLY MEANS

     On Sunday, France elected a new president---a mainstream Conservative by French standards---by nearly a two-to-one margin over a Right-Wing candidate. Emmanuel Macron's victory would normally be interpreted as a positive development. Macron was denounced and protested by the radical Left and Antifa, who are currently carrying on with a 'Not My President' movement and Macron Derangement Syndrome of their own. The fact that both finalists for the French Presidency represented varying degrees of the Right shows that France is still a strongly traditionalist country and has finally rejected corrosive Cultural Marxism.

      The US Corporate Media, however, is trying to spin this as a rejection of Trump-style populism---even though both in character and policy Macron is probably closer to Trump than Le Pen was. Both are wealthy businessmen who became president with no political experience; both had a broad appeal to the national working class; and both have a deep nationalist orientation. Macron gave a very Trump-like Acceptance Speech, stressing that national unity and healing must be a top priority; that the forgotten of France would be forgotten no more; and pledges to uphold law and order and to 'drain the swamp'.

        The main difference between Macron and Le Pen really centered on France's future as a member of the European Union. Macron is a staunch supporter of the EU; and some pundits have concluded from this that he opposes French sovereignty. This remains to be seen; but Macron's victory gives France considerable leverage in the EU---if Macron seizes the opportunity and takes political advantage of it. The EU is dominated by Germany; but the potential that France might withdraw from the Union sent a wake-up call throughout Europe that France can't be taken for granted. Even German officials were forced to admit that BREXIT was survivable; but FREXIT would end the EU. Germany could push France around with the weak Hollande in power; but Macron may not be so easily handled.

         Macron also has the advantage of a huge plurality of French citizens who favor FREXIT, so too much German bullying could easily get him to change course and bring the whole EU infrastructure. Thus, he has Germany over a barrel and since BREXIT, the Reich can't use Britain any longer to triangulate on France. If anyone doubts that France would do this, recall that President De Gaulle once withdrew France from NATO when he was fed up with American over-reaching. In spite of all its problems, France is still a world power.

          What damaged Le Pen more than anything was her party's connections to foreign interests---something that the American Far-Right has also been implicated doing. Le Pen's party was tied to other parties in other countries; which calls into question just how much it really represents the interests of France. And Le Pen had plenty of support from the Red Pill/Alt-Right factions who were quick to denounce Macron as a cuckservative and a racial traitor.

         Paul Ramsey: "France is like an SWJ girl who goes to Syria to combat 'Islamophobia' and ends up getting raped. At a certain point you just don't care."

         Florian: "It's not just the obvious fact that Democracy is fruitless, but that the people are fools. You cannot trust them to make change."

         Vox Day: "Macron will fail miserably of course, which is why I expect the National Front to come to power in the next election cycle."

         Mike Cernovich: "The board is set; Europe will have violent civil war."

          Andrew Anglin: "Macron's stunning victory no doubt confirms in the minds of Jews their most ardent belief: that the Goyim like being ruled over by them."

         Based Stickman: "We've hit a ceiling with nationalism and democracy. The question is whether an extra-democratic resistance forms next, or whether the West dies silently."

          White Millennial: "Don't be under the illusion that voting will save us. France is a time-bomb; the floodgates of Islamic terror remain open."

            Sargon of Akkad: "France was the last chance and they decided to cuck for the Rothschilds."

            Don't be THOSE guys. Democracy works and France is safe: in much better hands under Macron than under Hollande, certainly.

             President Trump congratulated Macron on his victory and plans to meet with him at the upcoming NATO Summit this month.

         

THE MANOSPHERE AND NAZIISM

   A reader recently asked why we consider Nazi blogs like The Daily Stormer a part of the Manosphere, or 'Red Pill' movement. He pointed out that Andrew Anglin, editor of that blog, has often disagreed with Game/PUA philosophy.

    It is so that these various Red Pill leaders not infrequently have fallings-out over who is the greatest; the most ideologically pure; etc. But they all hold essentially to the same core ideologies, as evidenced by the fact that commenters from the Manosphere and Neo-Nazi blogs regularly show up on the same sites. Anglin refers to himself as a Red Pill, has been praised and quoted freely by Manosphere writers, and employs Manosphere terminology and concepts quite freely. For example, The Daily Stormer carried an article recently about the anti-Election 'Woman's March' that famously earned pop-star Madonna a visit from the Secret Service.

     Here are some excerpts from Anglin's article, in which he argues that the Feminist protesters are sexually fixated on Trump and were vying for his attention.

     "Hating on a man and talking about how awful he is, is generally a sign that a woman wants to have sex with that man. They were actually demanding they be sexually assaulted by Donald Trump. You don't have to be a psychoanalyst to pick this up. Every single one of these women is sexually fixated on Donald Trump."

    Isn't that precisely what Game/PUA proponents teach? That female emotions mean nothing, and they are obsessed with sexual conquest? Lest there be any doubt that the Red Pills and Nazis are on the same page, Anglin continues:

     "This is what happens when you give women freedoms. They become outrageous and dangerous..."

     Again, nothing that one doesn't read regularly on Manosphere blogs. What makes women dangerous and uncontrollable with Liberty?

    "To understand why all these women want to have sex with a single man who is 70-years old, slightly overweight, and wasn't explicitly handsome when he was young, one must understand the concept of hypergamy...Donald Trump is the ultimate Alpha male. He is an aggressive, hostile conqueror who became ruler of the world through force of will. As such, he is the object of sexual fixation of all women on the planet."

    We have highlighted Manosphere/Red Pill terminology in the above passage to illustrate clearly that Anglin and other Nazis are not getting these ideas out of thin air. What Anglin is quoted here as saying is Red Pill Cult doctrine across the board. And have we never seen his conclusions on Manosphere sites?

    "Only by restricting the deranged sexual practices of women can we save our Civilization. And a vow to fix this problem is a sure way to get young men on board with a war against the Jews."

    That there is a direct ideological connection between the Red Pills and the Nazis is shown evidently once again. And not simply that both are movements that prey on alienated men with false promises of becoming an Ubermensch or an Alpha. Since Anglin referred to psychiatry, here's some excerpts from Psychoanalyst Erich Fromm who studied the Nazi phenomenon firsthand.

    "Naziism is marked by a relatively low degree of heterosexuality." Fromm wrote in 1936, "The psychic structure of both Hitler and his followers is characterized by hate, guilt feelings, and hostility towards sexuality...In the sadistic subjection of and fear of the female prevalent in the Nazis, one can find the fear of sexual impulses in general. The latent homosexual component among the Nazis expresses itself in the fanatical persecution of overt homosexuality...

    "Physiologically, the average authoritarian man is heterosexual; in his physical relationship to women, in terms of satisfying bodily needs, he is potent. But emotionally, he is homosexual and is hostile and cruel to women. Naziism is the tender and loving masochistic relationship developed by a weaker man toward a strong one."

     Thus, what the Red Pills write about the feminist protesters is simply projection.

     Had these men been honest Christians or Conservatives, they would have complained that the Women's March was a disgusting spectacle---degrading to all women---and maybe even contrasting Madonna's vulgarity and crudeness with Melanie Trump's feminine dignity and elegance. But instead, they deride the female nature while fawning over President Trump as a god-emperor and the ultimate Alpha; like a bunch of homosexuals throwing a jealous tantrum over the attention men pay to women.

     Fromm is correct; and this is likely the underlying bond between the Red Pills and the Nazis. Their hatred of women and idolization of stronger men (likely stemming from repressed homosexuality) is a point they both share.