This week, Israeli strongman and WEF member Benjamin Netanyahu visited the United States. A few minor controversies surrounded his visit: along with the ongoing ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians, video of an Israeli massacre of aid workers was leaked; another recording of Israeli operatives boasting of its influence (i.e. bribery) of top US Cabinet Officials was also exposed. Despite ongoing persecutions of Christians in the Holy Land, the US Senate rubber-stamped the nomination of Christian Zionist cult-member Mike Huckabee to the post of Ambassador to Israel.
Likewise, Hollywood entertainment-media promoter (now Secretary of Education) Linda McMahon announced freezing of Federal aid to universities and schools which tolerate criticism of Israel. Airhead DHS Secretary Kristi Noem announced further expansions of Domestic Espionage against critics of Israel, targeting (for now) only foreign-born Americans.
Meanwhile, while on the subject of foreign activists, in a meeting with heir to the Adelson Crime Family, the White House announced the creation of yet another new Federal 'czar's' office: appointing Israeli-born Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun to head a Task Force ferreting out critics of the Zionist Cult 'anti-Semitism.' All of these events pose a problem, which possibly Conservatives can explain for us:
While I realize that there are limitations to some of our thinking---especially those of us whose ideas of Conservatism were formed during an era where Conservatism stood for winning in the Marketplace of Ideas and hadn't evolved (as Jeff Bezos recently suggested) to mimicking the Democrats and settling all arguments with the simple formula: You're with us or you're against us, some clarification of what to you is obvious is needed. In spite of this handicap, maybe the New Right can help us all comprehend more clearly how things like:
1. Supporting Identity Politics;
2. Weaponizing Federal Police Agencies to enforce ideology;
3. Supporting Foreign Influence in the US Government;
4. Enforcing Speech Codes;
5. Creating Government Agencies to Combat 'Disinformation;'
6. Expanding Government Domestic Espionage Programs
are consistent with Conservative ideals. If Kamala Harris had won and had, for example, appointed a Saudi-born Imam to head an anti-Moslem Task Force, boasted about Islamic activists owning Congressmen, withheld funding and strong-armed academic institutions for criticizing Middle East Policy, set up Government-funded Disinformation Bureaus, etc.---would we hear all of this praise from 'Conservative' pundits and media outlets? Something tells me that we would not.
Hopefully, unlike numerous previous appeals for clarification, some evolved partisan of the New Right will step up and explain to all of us unenlightened and ignorant Paleo-Cons the high policy and 4-D strategy behind what appears to us to be simply co-opting and re-packaging policies forwarded by Clinton, Obama, and Biden.
We're not holding our breath here; but please be patient and understand that some of us still believe in not taking the RNC's word for everything at face value.
Happy Palm Sunday!
ReplyDeleteWhile I am clearly more optimistic about things than you are, government is still a partnership between we the people and those in power. Ironically, a branch of "we the people" are complaining we haven't got a bigger, more powerful dictatorship going on. We can call them red pills, woke right, whatever. The point being they care nothing for the rule of law or the US Constitution. But there is a much larger group that cares very much about such things and have been monitoring our Gov and calling them out when they see problems. Kristi Noem has been slammed lately for her cringy photo ops and there is a large group petitioning on behalf of Abrego Garcia. Pam Bondi has been called out for her melodramatic showmanship that produces nothing. Elon Musk said his role within DOGE would be temporary and true to his word, he has set a deadline and will be stepping away in a few months. I could go on and on, but my point being sometimes you have to trust in the will of the people, in their ability to influence politics and rein government in when people see a problem.
It is a hopeful sign that some of this is being called out; even the toadies at LifeSite News have been questioning all of the hero-worship around Andrew Tate. The behavior of these Alt-RINOs over immigration has been truly appaling. Kristi Noem recently spoke at Summit where one of the ICE Directors actually said that ICE should incorporate Amazon's Business Model to speed up deportations. A part of me worries that it's only a matter of time before these 'Efficiency Experts' decide that gas-chambers are far more 'cost-effective'.
DeleteKristi Noem has been a huge disappointment. She was the only Republican Governor who stood up to the Scamdemic from Day One. Since then, though, she seems to be trying to become a Sarah Palin or Ann Coulter clone.
As for 'we the people' though, it's hard to argue that they've shown much inclination to deal with problems in authority in recent years.