One of the great benefits of the Internet is that it allows to circumvent the agenda-driven Western Media Cartels and hear things that PC culture diligently suppresses. Pravda, which occasionally posts some good op-ed pieces recently published an essay The Key Facts About Homosexuality which debunks the common pro-homosexual talking-points promulgated in their propaganda.
The author, apparently a Turkish journalist, states plain facts which would never be allowed publication in our free and open society. Once, here in Western countries, medical/psychiatric professionals knew and understood the damage promoting this so-called alternative lifestyle among the young can cause, and for this reason it was prohibited. The author points out that, in Russia---where the government has wisely taken measures to protect society from this scourge---instances of drug abuse, suicide, and mental disorders are already declining among the young.
Contrary to the image imposed upon us by the Media, homosexuals make up only a numerically insignificant percentage of the population. In fact, if homosexuals were considered an ethnic group, they would rank about 5th or 6th in minority demographics---numerically about as represented as American Indians. Of course, they are not an ethnic group, but people who have chosen a lifestyle which the author also cites recent studies. The studies found the very same conclusions once reached by American scholars: that homosexuality is a choice. In fact, nearly all scholarly American psychiatric publications from before the 1970s are filled with case-studies of homosexuality being cured. And these cures did not involve religious conversion or torture, as homosexual propagandists would have us believe, but through ordinary psychoanalysis and counseling.
Census data shows us that homosexuals seem to be concentrated in a few major cities---not coincidentally centers of governmental, media, and academic power. It ought to be apparent to anybody who's still sentient in America that the Rainbow Movement is the product of a deliberate, well-financed, and well-coordinated organization. Not only in America, but we've seen recently this group has the capability of projecting its power abroad: exporting provocateurs into foreign countries like Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Brazil, and Israel most recently.
When we see in the United States co-ordinated attacks upon those who oppose the homosexual agenda; everything from spontaneous attacks on the Internet to boycotts; the legal costs of the recent so-called 'marriage debate'; the fact that homosexual propaganda dominates the American media and that Government at every level caves into their demands and enforces their will---these things are the obvious consequence of what may be termed, A Shadow Government.
This is another reason why sensible governments have historically suppressed homosexuals. Earlier psychological studies---especially from the WW2 Era---show that homosexuality is collectively, as well as individually antisocial. That many Nazi leaders of that era were openly or latently homosexual is well-documented; and homosexuals naturally gravitate to authoritarian political regimes. This is because homosexuals are united in a common cause by their sexual identity and not by national allegiance. By definition, they hate tradition: family, religion, nation, and are filled with bitterness and resentment against heterosexuals of any kind.
All of this is rapidly becoming a moot point in America, where the effete and degenerate population really no longer offers any resistance to any hostile force, foreign or domestic, who want to control them. But other countries---who still cherish freedom, faith, and family---can take note. Guard your borders. Because Cultural Imperialism is just as dangerous to your sovereignty as military intervention; and the erosion of a society at its fundamental levels will ensure its collapse.
Every so often, the US Government-Media Complex needs to distract Americans from reality---especially when problems get too big to be ignored. So, their usual course of action is to choose some eccentric leader of some obscure country and run a series of hit-pieces about them. The American cultural elites can always count on Ameroboob illiteracy and complete ignorance of geopolitics to channel their outrage away from those to whom it should be properly directed.
North Korea and its leader Kim Jong Un have been the target of American Outrage for the last several months. Most Ameroboobs, though they can't find North Korea on a map, are convinced that the world is in imminent peril through the machinations of its brutal dictator. Of course, we've been told the same thing about other countries and their leaders for the last 3 decades. The average American, while smoking marijuana and watching The Kardashians, needs these occasional reminders of American Exceptionalism and that jealous foreigners are ever plotting to steal our way of life.
We're told that Kim Jong Un is an unstable character: a Communist (unlike Bernie Sanders); a product of corruption and nepotism (unlike Hilary Clinton); and a ruthless, self-aggrandizing egomaniac (unlike Donald Trump). The Media Cartels have also been laughing themselves into a stupor over the PRNK Congress and its superficial showmanship because, as we all know, American political campaigns and conventions are solemn and deeply edifying affairs whose leaders would never stoop to that kind of pandering.
And there's the imminent threat North Korea poses to world peace. Over the last decade, we see that North Korea attacked or destabilized---how many countries? Well, none. Contrast that record to the US: Iraq, Georgia, Egypt, Libya, Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, Brazil... and a few others like Ireland and Italy where US provocateurs introduced social change like homosexual 'marriage.'
The American public, too, has to be properly outraged at North Korea's levels of poverty and ignorance. Now, if this same outrage were directed at America's failing public schools, inner-city ghettos, and collapsing infrastructure we might have some justification here. But it's easier to laugh at North Korea instead.
Where does the Government-Media Complex get all the material to bash North Korea? Mostly from sources in North Korea's neighbors: South Korea and the Japanese Empire. Now, both of the latter two invest heavily in the United States, and invest in the American media in particular, whereas North Korea does not.
Hence we have South Korea---a country where the Moonies boast about the numbers of its converts among the ruling elites; and the Japanese Empire---a country who worships its emperor as an incarnation of the sun-god, telling us that North Korea is run by a fanatical personality cult. The fact that both the Moonies and Japan, Incorporated own huge swaths of the US economy and maintain large political lobbies here is presumed not to reflect on their credibility.
"But---" some will exclaim "What if North Korea gets an atomic bomb!" Think about it for a moment. Just a few months ago, Kim Jong Un announced with great fanfare that North Korea had successfully launched its first weather satellite. And we seriously believe they have ICBMs?
Yes, North Korea has a nuclear program. They are about as advanced as the US was in 1943. Pakistan has a larger nuclear arsenal than North Korea. And which country is more likely to let its arsenal fall into the hands of anti-American terrorists? The are no Wahhabi, Taliban, or Al-Qaeda in North Korea, but plenty of them in Pakistan.
But these facts will likely be lost on the somnambulant American public. We're a culture that no longer produces heroes; hence we need scapegoats.
Blogger Insanity Bytes published a short, but pointed, critique today defending Christian author Robert Murphy against some canards thrown against him by the Game Cult. The full text of her article is here.
What the Game Cult fundamentally is; is a masculinized version of Radical Feminism. Now, certain elements within the Game movement have conjoined to it a few Christian aspects--- based on exclusively on their own interpretations of the Bible, which never contradict Game. Gamers who are professed Atheists are welcome in their ranks as well. The reason for this is simply because Game, not Christianity, is the basis of their mutual beliefs.
It is characteristic of cults to ostracize and excommunicate traditional religions as corrupt; which explains perfectly how nominal Christians and philosophic Atheists can work together within the same framework. According to Gamers, regardless of their theism or lack of it, traditional Christianity has become corrupted by Feminism. Hence, they freely can attack Christian beliefs while pretending to uphold them.
The attack on Murphy is a fairly common specimen of what the Game Cult routinely does. The Game author, purportedly a happily married father in a post-feminist world, takes issue with this passage from Murphy:
"But since I'm directing this essay at you, a Christian, I can tell you frankly that these {i.e., Game/PUA} techniques are FROM THE DEVIL. Yes, you can actually train yourself to look at women... as less than human, so that you are no longer afraid of their opinion of you, then your long career of striking out will be over. You will go from being terrified of beautiful women to knowing how to spot the incredibly insecure ones, who spend hours getting ready because they think they need to in order to deserve attention from men. You will laugh at your old self, who was somehow intimidated by a 115-lb. creature in heels. What was your problem?"
Initially, we would assert that Murphy is, in fact, wrong on a couple of points. First, he assumes that half naked creatures in heels who spend hours getting ready are incredibly insecure. The reality is that women like this are typically very confident; the insecure ones typically pay little attention to their appearance. Witness how it is the Feminists---women not especially renown for their physical beauty---who preach absurdities like Fat Acceptance and label healthy male attraction objectification. His second mistake is thinking that PUA tactics are actually effective; or that PUAs claims of success are even true. The reality is that a woman seeking casual sex knows these PUA tactics by heart; pretends to fall for them; and the PUA who laughs at Beta Chumps ends up being decoyed himself without even realizing it.
But, of course, the Gamers ignore those flaws and pounce on Murphy for the points wherein he is correct. "It is the Pedestal, not sexual morality, that Murphy fears will be lost if Christian men learn the truth about women's sexual nature!", he thunders. This one sentence provides an outstanding example of the rhetorical sophistry cultists employ. The statement defines as the Gamers as Christian men as opposed to Murphy, who by the implication here supports the Pedestal (one of the imaginary motifs of the Game Cult).
Then the Gamer extrapolates from this further: "Murphy is not alone in his pronounced reverence for women." he complains, (despite the fact that Jesus' reverence for women was also quite pronounced), "Worshipping women is extremely common in modern Christianity, so much so that it isn't seen as odd or noteworthy." Here he connects reverence for women with Idolatry, and performs the same rhetorical sophistry as before, by juxtaposing his own cult to mainstream Christianity which, incidentally, does not condone the worship of women.
In the opening paragraph of his article, the Gamer plays another verbal trick by connecting the term fear to the term reverence which, as employed in the King James Version is a correct delineation; but he flips the terms later in his article to equate reverence with the modern definition of fear. "Fearing women is not something that the Bible teaches" he states the obvious, but says: "Christians are to fear God and wives are to fear their husbands." We see why he had no issue with Murphy's complaint that Gamers/PUAs see women as less than human, because it's quite clear that they do: and nowhere in the New Testament is there any support for such an idea. The rhetorical juxtaposition that Christians are to fear God; as opposed to women who are to fear men very clearly illustrates that these cultists consider women to be subhuman.
He goes on to quote a few Biblical passages out of their context, along with some very unconvincing platitudes about sexual morality and idolatry which seem to have been inserted into his article as an afterthought. None of these deserve any further comment. However it is very clear that the author of the Game blog in question is a skilled propagandist. We here know nothing of his personal background, but the rhetorical techniques he routinely employs display education in their use.
In conclusion, we will state that neither Game nor Feminism come from any failings of the Christian Church; but come instead from the breakdown of the family. The family is the integral foundation of a society---and the Church is a social institution. Gamers blame the Church; Feminists blame the Government; but no society can be strong unless men and women bond as equals---equals within a polarity of genders---uniting to build families. Neither Game nor Feminism believe in gender polarity; both advocate gender supremacy. Neither believe in the traditional family; both teach that whichever gender they believe superior has no responsibilities or obligations towards the other. Neither attitude is either Christian or civilized.
Allied media sources are reporting today that ISIS Supreme Commander, and unindicted war criminal, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has fled Raqqa and is believed to have escaped across the Iraqi border. Allied forces scored major victories in the vicinity of the ISIS capital this past week. As typical of ISIS leaders, Baghdadi saw the handwriting on the wall and decided the prudent course of action was to save his own skin and let his followers achieve the glory of martyrdom.
Earlier last week, Allied forces took control of the western roads leading to Raqqa, then advanced on the strategic town of Deir Ezzur, overlooking Raqqa. On Friday, Kurdish auxiliaries swept into Eastern Syria, advancing into Raqqa's surburbs. On Saturday, the Syrian Air Force raided ISIS' special operations headquarters, killing 17 ISIS leaders.
As Allied forces advanced, further evidence of ISIS atrocities are coming to light; in spite of US media attempts to keep them out of public sight. Deir Ezzur was formerly home to a top-tier medical center; Allied liberators have learned that ISIS abducted the medical personnel and transferred them Raqqa. When in control of the city, they forced the doctors to use the facility as a field hospital---after murdering the civilian patients to make room for their wounded men. Kurdish militias discovered a mass grave of unburied dead in a ravine near Raqqa, with hundreds of corpses visible from cliffs above. According to local villagers, ISIS soldiers rounded up Christians and threw them alive over the cliff.
Middle Eastern media outlets report that a former Egyptian Intelligence official, who served in the previous Moslem Brotherhood government, claimed that Baghdadi had been wounded late last year and taken to Turkey for medical treatment. From there, he moved to Sirte, Libya where Obama's puppet-government protected him during his recovery.
It may well be that Baghdadi is, or is planning, an escape from the Middle East with help from Obama and his confederates. If Baghdadi is captured, he would be put on trial and his testimony would expose US/NATO complicity in ISIS crimes.
This weekend, dissident EU politicians assembled in Yalta, Crimea to attend the International Economic Forum. Their purpose was to show solidarity against the anti-Russia Sanctions, which, though they have enriched Wall Street and empowered the German Government, have devastated EU economies.
A positive development emerged from Yalta, when Italian representative Stefano Valdegamberi announced that he planned formal submission of a bill in the Venetian Legislature recognizing Crimea as a Russian State and renouncing the EU Sanctions. Valdegamberi explained that he had enough co-signers on the bill to ensure its passage.
The sanctions have hit Italy especially hard, costing Venice alone over 1 billion Euros. The Italian economy and culture are also strained by waves of immigrants forced on them by US/EU policies. Reaction has reached such a point in Italy, that Italian Prime Minister Mateo Renzi snubbed Obama at last year's G-7 meeting to meet with President Putin.
Italy was already suffering a refugee crisis before Obama and Merkel began flooding Europe with ISIS/FSA refugees. US military adventurism in Somalia and Libya (both former Italian colonies) and in Italy's neighbor, the former Yugoslavia put an enormous strain on the Italian economy. This situation worsened with the Sanctions. Like other EU countries, Italy had a beneficial trade agreement with Russia; but is now compelled to buy essentials from American corporations at highly inflated prices.
Edward Snowden's revelations about US skullduggery in Italy and the TTIP scandal have also soured US-Italian relations.
The Cultural Marxists have an especial hatred for Italy. Italy is not only the epicenter of Roman Catholicism, but one of the leading contributors to traditional Western Culture, which the Left also hates. Western Civilization owes much to the Roman Empire, the Roman Catholic Church, and the Italian Renaissance.
Not only have US/EU Leftist interests intentionally pushed for Islamicization of Italy; they have forced on the Italian populace repugnant social norms. Last year, foreign provocateurs and US dollars flowed into the country to impose homosexual so-called 'marriage'---identical to the tactics the Gay Mafia successfully employed in Ireland. The Left met with some initial success; though there is pending legislation in the Italian Parliament to restore traditional marriage.
Hopefully, they will meet with success; and hopefully Venice will lead Italy out of both the EU and NATO. The Italians have historically led Western Civilization during its darkest hours---maybe they will again.
The US Navy announced this weekend that Commander Eric Rasch was disgraced and relieved of command after a four-month investigation. Rasch was the executive officer commanded Coastal Riverine Squadron 3, a unit assigned to the Persian Gulf. It was personnel under Rasch's command whose poltroonery in front of the Iranian Navy made the American military an international laughing-stock for months to come.
Commander Gregory Meyer, Rasch's superior officer is also being investigated. According to the Navy Times, "officials believe that a navigational error, along with some baffling errors in judgment on the part of the crew, led to their capture. Officials have suggested that the crew may have been taking an unauthorized shortcut through Iranian waters to meet up with a US Coast Guard vessel for refueling."
To those who've followed the decline of the American military over the last two decades, the errors in judgment are not baffling at all. When a country dumbs-down its schools, emasculates its young men, and lowers military recruitment standards to the bottom of the barrel; why is anybody surprised when its military personnel do stupid things or act like cowards? The only surprising thing is that incidents like these don't happen more often.
Now, daring to criticize our brave men and women in uniform in the US is tantamount to blasphemy, in spite of the fact that they've proven themselves to be complete schlepps for the last two decades. Lt. Commander Hossein Salami of the Iranian Navy---an actual military man---stated to the Iranian press that: "The Marines were crying when they were being captured, but they felt better after the IRGC forces treated them with kindness. The Americans humbly admitted our might and power, and we freed the Marines after we were certain that they had entered our waters unintentionally."
Americans should be ashamed that the Boy Scouts of 50 years ago were tougher than the US Marines today. They should be, but they likely won't.
From this:
To this:
In one generation.
The US presidential elections are, admittedly, a distasteful subject. When we look at the candidates from 1988 onwards and compare them to the candidates before them, any thinking American can hardly escape feeling depressed. And, then, when we compare the candidates of 2016 to many foreign statesmen, we can hardly escape feeling ashamed. That we'll likely end up with either a showman, a deranged Feminist, or a Communist representing us in 2017 is not a pleasant scenario. And that is assuming, of course, that the current president doesn't completely snap and declare himself President-for-Life.
But there was an interesting article posted today about Donald Trump that deserves some commentary; and the full text can be found here.
There is a good analysis here about Trump's popularity, although we are skeptical about equating modern Social Conservatism with anything remotely resembling what traditional American Conservatism actually is. When, in 1989, the presidency passed from a Traditional Conservative to a kinder, gentler caricature of a Conservative, Conservatism in America effectually died. The Reagan Administration was not the beginning of a Conservative movement; it was the end of one. A few lone voices in the 1990s like Patrick Buchanan and William F. Buckley spoke out; but were drown out by a herd of charging RINOs led by Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, and Rupert Murdoch. Conservatism became simply defined as not being a Democrat; otherwise, for all the good that Republican Congresses and 8 years of Junior & Cheney accomplished, they may as well as never happened.
But it is what the author says regarding Trump that is especially prescient and noteworthy:
"Donald Trump is essentially a Manosphere type. He is a swaggering 'Alpha Male' living out the fantasy of what a high-status man can achieve without apologies. Trump, being a Manosphere type, explains his lack of any real connection to religion, his sins of adultery... The Manosphere is radically anti-feminist, yet at the same time not very interested in gay rights or abortion and often excuses or even promotes promiscuity and has many other moral failings; also the Manosphere is not very connected to religion. This Manosphere profile matches Donald Trump quite closely."
This is a good observation, and we could add to it that Trump's stated views on religion are not that radically different from Manospherians in the Game Cult who wear a veneer of Christianity.
The parallel here between Social Conservatism and the Manosphere is this: just like Social Conservatives are basically Neo-Liberals who find Radical Leftists repugnant; most Manospherians are basically Male Feminists who want everything Feminism offers except for the female empowerment part. That part of feminism, they want for men, but they're fine with everything else.
Because the TRUTH here simply is this: Trump is not a 'manly Alpha leader' and neither are most Manospherian writers.
In the Gamer Paradigm, an Alpha Male is defined by his ability to conquer women sexually, reproduce offspring, excite other men's envy, and, most importantly of all, have a big mouth that runs freely without fear of consequences. In contrast, a real man wins the love of a high-value woman, provides for his children, earns the respect of other men, and says worthwhile things from a position of acquired wisdom.
If anybody doubts that a difference between a Manosphere 'Alpha' and a Real Man exists; let them compare Donald Trump to Theodore Roosevelt (both rich men from NY). Then let them ask themselves if they'd follow Trump or follow Roosevelt when they needed a real man and the question answers itself. Contrary to what the Gamers say, a man's value is determined by what he does; not by what he says.
But sadly, the day of the Bull Moose is gone in America; and the Alpha Thug rules in his stead.
