As we're all aware by now, the perverts in the Corporate Media have disseminated a phony intelligence report that originated from some anonymous trolls at 4chan. The pornographic magazine Penthouse has now offered a $1 million reward for anyone who can produce the scandalous video. I think that we can safely predict that the Guccione family fortune won't be making any payouts anytime soon.
The Kremlin practically laughed off the allegations, with spokesman Dmitry Peskov stating that it was sad that American journalism had descended to this level of hysteria and vulgarity. On a more serious note, Julian Assange pointed out that the leaked memo was clearly a hoax: even using language not employed by American security agencies. Sadly, it is not uncommon for the Corporate Media to publish hoaxes. As President-Elect Trump pointed out today, many innocent lives have been ruined by such fake news.
Buzzfeed was the media outlet that first published the story. Buzzfeed is owned by an arch-Leftist millionaire media mogul Jonah Peretti. one of the founders of The Huffington Post. Like many others in the Corporate Media, Peretti has had no journalistic training. He has a degree in Envionmental Science for UC-Santa Cruz, one of the most Left-Wing universities in the US. His sister and brother-in-law are both Hollywood performers, known for pontificating anti-Trump hysteria on Twitter and elsewhere.
The story was then broadcast by CNN, which just as typically didn't bother to verify any of the sources.
Besides the obvious falsehood of the story; Trump or any other elected official wouldn't have needed to travel to Russia to engage in such activities anyway. Politicians and newsmen have plenty of venues in Washington, DC where they can indulge their perversions quite freely.
British journalist Glenn Greenwald---who published Edward Snowden's revelations---summed matters up best:
"Demanding that evidence-free anonymous assertions be venerated as truth---despite emanating from the very precincts designed to propagandize and lie---is an assault on journalism, democracy, and basic human rationality...There is no bigger favor that Trump opponents can do for him than attack him with such lowly, shabby, obvious shams, and recruiting large media outlets to lead the way. When it comes time to expose actual Trump corruption and criminality, who is going to believe that the people and institutions who have demonstrated that they are willing to endorse any assertion, no matter how factually baseless, who deploy any journalistic tactic no matter how unreliable and basic means of ensuring accuracy?"
The Corporate Media doesn't get it. Glenn Greenwald does.
Dylann Roof, another 'racially-aware' Red Pill Cultist, was sentenced to hang today for the murder of 9 Christians during a prayer service in a South Carolina church in 2015. Roof was a regular commenter at the Manosphere blog, The Daily Stormer, run by Andrew Anglin. Anglin is a self-described Red Pill and MGTOW, and has often been praised by Red Pill bloggers like Vox Day.
As we've pointed out before, the Red Pills are foes of Christianity, Conservatism, and Americanism in general. They often pose as defenders of Western Civilization, when their true goal is its overthrow. Prudently avoiding any mention of the Roof verdict, bloggers Chateau Heartiste (whose real name is Jim Weidmann) and Vox Day (whose real name is Theodore Beale) are again calling for Race War.
Heartiste published an article, endorsed by Vox, titled A White Hot Fire Rises, in which he extrapolates from a photo of two Hollywood has-beens frowning during Meryl Streep's recent tirade a white backlash.
"They forge in the furnace of their unalloyed disgust a quiet and seething intolerance for the enemies of White Men; a vengeance devised to settle the ultimate score---recapture of their homeland from degenerates within---percolates in their blood and radiates from their irises."
Most likely, though, these two fellows in the photograph---like many of these rest of us---were more disgusted that Meryl Streep turned an awards ceremony into a personal attention-seeking political hate-fest. But civility is a concept lost on Liberals and Red Pills alike.
Heartiste drones on, with all the rhetorical flourish he can muster: "Look at those eyes, brimming with righteous hatred closely, and multiply that number by millions; because that's how many White Men of the West feel the same way. And their numbers grow daily. White Men are awakening to their planned and active dispossession by malevolent forces corrupting the creation of their ancestors."
This is coming from someone who, in the same article, rhapsodized about the 'heroic act' of five toughs tearing down anti-Trump posters and gloating over one protestor. If frowning and tearing down posters were all that these Red Pills could do; we shouldn't worry too much about a Race War---unless it was going to end in a pillow fight. Unfortunately, it doesn't stop there. Heartiste literally means war; and it is clear from his tone in the article and his comments below that he is genuinely hoping to incite violence. Responding to a commenter who objected to tearing down the posters, Heartiste writes: "This is war. The time for 'being above it' was when we still labored under the belief that a high-minded stance would work."
But lest any Red Pill fanatic get the idea from such writers to become the next Dylann Roof, recall that Heartiste was among the first in line to save his own skin by throwing Roof under the bus. On a blog post dated June 18th, 2015, Heartiste called Roof an 'Omega' and made some speculations about his motives: "Was Roof a failure with White Women he desired but couldn't get, and did this rejection drive him to the extremes of white-knightery, culminating in murdering the symbol of his torment...or alternately, was he cucked by a Black guy, and instead of blaming the White girl, he exonerated her from all responsibility and focused all his Incel rage on the interloper?" Then he dismisses the idea the idea that Roof had really learned Game, or taken the Red Pill.
Heartiste really comes across as the toxic personality type who enjoys destroying those whom he envies. By many accounts, he was formerly a financial bureaucrat in a firm contracted by the Federal Government. We're all familiar with this type. Resentful, bitter, arrogant---delights in pulling down others to make himself feel superior; all the while laughing up his sleeve at the damage he's caused.
There is no ideology behind people like these except hatred and destruction for its own sake. Destroying happiness between the genders; destroying harmony between the races; sowing among religions; undermining the blessings of Liberty---that is what this whole Red Pill Cult is all about. They prey on the vulnerable whom they use as cat's-paws; but then slink into the background when the day of reckoning comes.
While American Culture Elites were busy in Hollywood bashing our electoral process, Chinese leaders were attending a ceremony honoring top scientists on Sunday. There were two winners at China's annual event this year. Tu Youyou; a medical specialist discovered a new and more effective cure for Malaria. Zhao Zhongxian, one of China's top physicists, was honored for his discoveries in superconductivity and its relation to energy conservation.
Chinese President Xi Jinping personally awarded the two scientists, which included a cash prize of nearly three-quarter of a million US dollars to each winner. 3,300 political, military, and social figures were in attendance, according to Xinhua News.
Xi noted that China has seen momentous scientific gains during the past year, especially in space exploration, deep-sea research, and communications technologies. He urged all scientists to follow the example of the prize winners and turn their talents towards the benefit of China. Premier Li Keiquiang promised that the Party would expand resources for scientific development in 2017.
"Scientists taking the lead in innovation are entitled to more power to do their jobs," Li stated, "Distribution policies must be better implemented to honor and reward innovators. China is willing to offer opportunities for talented individuals at home or from abroad to fulfill their ambitions in China."
What does this story illustrate for us? Well, we note three things about Chinese scientists that differ from their American counterparts:
1. Top achievers get national recognition from the highest levels of government;
2. Scientists are well-paid for their efforts;
3. The media holds them up as national heroes and celebrities.
These could be among several reasons why China has been crushing the US in technology for the last several years. China is a society where scientists are rewarded and recognized as part of the Cultural Elite; instead of bloviating Hollywood imbeciles like we reward and revere in this country.
Forbes Magazine reported in 2013 that American scientists are so poorly funded that 20% have applied for work in other countries. A majority of immigrant scientists who study here also return to their home countries, where they are better compensated. According to a survey conducted by that magazine, 46% of scientific institutions have laid off assistant researchers; and the unemployment rate in the science field is high. And a number of them are going to China.
This should be unsurprising given the corruption and incompetence of the American educational system. Americans today are among the most scientifically ignorant people alive. For example, a 2014 National Science Foundation survey discovered that 25% of Americans do not know that the Earth revolves around the Sun. It took only one generation from winning the Space Race to becoming the world leader in Transgender Toilets. Nothing sums up the state of American Academia more clearly than that.
Meanwhile, China marches on. While American scientists jockey for research grants---or end up in the unemployment line---Chinese scientists enjoy wealth, national respect, and job satisfaction. And that's worth a lot more in the long run than a Golden Globe speech.
To no one's surprise, the phony Golden Globe Awards was all about seeing which Hollywood ringard would titillate all the celebrity-worshipping Liberals by spouting off against the Presidential Election results. And dutifully, 67-year old Meryl Streep jumped at the opportunity; blabbing for almost six minutes, accusing Trump of everything modern Hollywood is guilty of doing.
The kind of Trash Culture that the entertainment wing of the Corporate Media represents is one reason why our society is deteriorating. This is particularly true of how Hollywood portrays women. Aging Cougars (e.g. Meryl Streep, Madonna); vulgar loudmouths (e.g. Rosie O'Donnell, Whoopi Goldberg); repulsive sluts (e.g. Miley Cyrus, Katy Perry)---these are the types of females one would encounter in low-end urban dive bars. Yet the Cultural Elites hold them up as the yardstick by which American women are to be measured.
Just a generation ago, American women were renowned worldwide for their beauty and elegance. Psychologist Albert Ellis noted in 1962 that American women were the most scrupulous about their appearance and the most feminine of all other cultures. And in his day, when actresses married foreign princes and the glamorous Jacqueline Kennedy was First Lady, it was so. Contrast that to today when the only US marriage demographic going up is between American-born men and foreign-born women. And even our President-Elect, certainly an eligible bachelor, ended up married to a Yugoslavian.
Maybe it is time for a 'MAWGA Movement'---Make American Women Great Again. Cultivate femininity; celebrate feminine virtues; teach women again that it's alright not to hate men. In other words, do exactly the opposite of what the Media and Academia tell women to do.
We can always look to past examples. Out of our site's Feature Friday archives, we found a few:
Is it any wonder that American men were once such industrious workers, fearless soldiers, and defenders of their communities? The women of the past were the incentive: Meryl Streep and Hilary Clinton, not so much.
After a long series of allegations, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has agreed to investigate human rights and national sovereignty abuses committed by the World Wildlife Fund. The WWF has been under suspicion for many years; the current charges were filed by Survival International, another activist group that campaigns for preservation of indigenous peoples and traditions.
The complaint centers on WWF activities in the West African nation of Cameroon. SI has provided evidence that WWF hired what are essentially mercenaries as part of an 'anti-poaching' patrol; called by them Eco-Guards. SI alleges that these WWF operatives have been waging persecution against Cameroon's Baka tribe; who are hunter-gathers much like many of our historical American Indian tribes. According to the complaint, Baka women and children have been beaten with machetes and their camps burned and pillaged. Threats and physical violence against them have been fairly routine.
This is not the first time that WWF has come under public scrutiny for such activities. In 1991 it was revealed that the organization employed the British mercenary firm KAS International to fight poachers in Africa. They were nearly expelled from Cambodia in 2009 after the Cambodian Government caught them in a fundraising scam relating to the Mekong Dolphin. Interested Wall Street corporations also donate over $80 million annually to WWF; many of which have dubious human rights and environmental records themselves.
WWF was formerly organized and headed by a sinister Dutch aristocrat named Prince Bernhard. With a South African businessman named Anton Rupert, Bernhard founded an organization called The 1001 Club in 1970; which still directs WWF policies. Allegedly an environmentalist group, The 1001 Club keeps its membership secret and has been the subject of many conspiracy theories. Some of the names of members which have leaked out over the years have included Baron von Thyssen (whose family supported Hitler during his rise to power); Giovanni Agnelli (whose father was a defense contractor under Mussolini); Henry Ford (grandson of US automaker and anti-Semitic author of the same name); Mobutu Sese Seko, (former dictator of the Congo); Juan Samaranch (an official in the Spanish Franco Regime); and Alfred Heineken (Dutch brewing magnate who assumed control over the company during the Nazi Occupation). A most unsavory lot, to say the least.
As for the late Prince Bernhard, he was a devoted member of the Nazi Party until 1940 when the Germans invaded the Netherlands, after which he served with the Government-in-Exile; though he was suspected by many to be a double-agent who arranged the escape of Nazi leaders. The Prince was also the founder of the notorious Bilderberg Group. He had several illegitimate children and once plotted a coup in Indonesia to make himself viceroy. In 1976, he was caught taking bribes from Lockheed for Dutch defense contracts. And these were just the high-points of his career.
Bernhard died in 2004, and the WWF is currently run by Yolanda Kakabatse, of Ecuador, who was one of the authors of the controversial UN Agenda 2030.
The WWF as we see, has no difficulty attracting environmentalist fanatics and people of extremely equivocal characters. It is organizations like this that have given Conservationism a bad name; especially here in the US. The Conservation Movement really began here with outdoorsmen like President Theodore Roosevelt and Naturalist John Burroughs. It got a second life with the Ecology Movement of the 1960s and 1970s, but has since fallen into the hands of extremists. Conservatives, at some point, need seriously to take the issue back from the Far Left. The Ecology Movement of the last generation were led by hunting and outdoor sportsmen's groups who saw the need to preserve vital ecosystems.
Hopefully, the OECD will take positive action and bring this evil group down. Then we can get on with the business of resuming a positive and sensible approach to environmental management.
The New York Post, a Murdoch-owned tabloid, had an article yesterday which has gone somewhat viral among Conservatives. The author is essentially pointing out that many of the effete Hollywood Left who, by today's low standards, pass for celebrities are planning to make some anti-Trump scenes at tomorrow's Golden Globe Awards and next month's Academy Awards ceremonies.
Neither one of these events have been relevant in many years; and very probably are totally rigged. Nonetheless, these productions are carried out for the benefit of low-information Liberals, who hang on the edge of their seats waiting for one of these nobodies to say something 'controversial'.
Most of today's Hollywood celebrities would, at the apex of their careers, achieved little more than parts in TV commercials during Cinema's Golden Age. But this is what is considered talent in Postmodern America.
The author of the Post article points out that these 'celebrity divas' offend half of Americans who supported Trump. Which really illustrates how dumb modern celebrities really are. In the past, celebrities had appeal because they were identified with their roles and kept their politics to themselves. The old-school studio producers were businessmen who considered actors employees; and publically spouting off about politics could effect the audience---to whom they happen to be selling their product. Few people even today know that the heroic-looking Gregory Peck was a Left-Wing Socialist; or that the petite and charming Patsy Ruth Miller was pretty hardcore Far Right. This is because we identify Peck with the stolid, stand-your-ground officer in Pork Chop Hill and Miller as the tender-hearted heroine of The Hunchback of Notre Dame. Which is also because their job was acting---not running for political office.
But in our day, when the personal is political, even entertainers have to be defined by where they stand on national politics. This unwholesome trend really started during the late 1960s and has reached the point where elected officials and news pundits go straight from the Media to positions of power. The irony that's lost on these Hollywood Leftists is that Donald Trump---the very man they're all protesting---is arguably a product of the same sociopolitical dynamic that they created themselves.
The article points out some of the ridiculous statements coming out of these celebrities---most of whom appear to be too dumb to understand that they are among "the privileged millionaires and billionaires" targeted by the Left-Wing radicals whom they universally endorse. Katy Perry tweeted "The Revolution is Coming" apparently not understanding what Anarchists like the Chicago Four might actually do to people like her in a real revolution.
Similarly, Rosie O'Donnell, Michael Shannon, and Debra Messing signed an open letter ---published in The New York Times--- calling for "millions to flood the streets to prevent Trump-Pence from taking office before January 20." Seriously, who would follow any one of these three clowns in revolutionary action? These idiots have no idea what they'd actually do if they succeeded in overthrowing the government.
Chris Evans, who played Captain America in a politically-correct rip-off of a fairly good 1940s movie serial, whined on Election Night in a viral tweet that, "This is an embarrassing night for America. We have let a hate-monger rule our great nation." And so on, and so on.
Why is Postmodern Hollywood so decidedly to the Left? The reason is because today's Hollywood---like today's Liberalism---is totally based on fraud. Hollywood is an oligarchy, like the Democratic Party, run by incompetents who don't deserve wealth or fame; but achieve success by posing as populists while palming off inferior products onto a gullible public whom they actually despise as inferiors. The DNC and Hollywood are exactly parallel in their social attitudes and moral conduct.
Hopefully, with the downfall of the Clinton Machine, we'll see a downfall of the Corporate Media as well. They aren't the invincible super-race they portray themselves as being. Seeing past the superficial is the first step towards reform.
As we all heard from the Corporate Media, another of our politically-corrected Pentagon's members went berserk in a Florida airport; killing and maiming dozens of innocent people. The suspect was known to the FBI; which was too busy investigating alleged Russian e-mail hacking to do anything. The suspect allegedly took a gun from his baggage and began randomly shooting; unnoticed by the TSA who were, no doubt, busily strip-searching attractive young boys in town for Pride Week. And the Corporate Media and Liberal politicians assure us all that allowing known violent madmen to roam the streets at will poses no danger to society; while carrying firearms for self-defense, does.
There was, however, some better aviation news today. SANA reported that the first successful test-flight from Aleppo International Airport took off today. This was the first flight since 2013, when US-backed terrorist forces took over the city. The newly-liberated citizens of Aleppo gathered to watch the feat; and were addressed by Syria's Minister of Transportation who stated that commercial flights could be opened in Aleppo again as early as next month.
This was quite a triumph for Syria. Aleppo was formerly the country's largest airhub. Allied Forces captured the airport a little over two weeks ago and it is now almost fully operational. Contrast that scenario with exceptionalist America---where even building a new runway can take several years.
The condition of US Airports is so bad that the American Society of Civil Engineers rated our system as 'poor' in its 2016 Annual Infrastructure Report. The report concluded that "An aviation system that was once the envy of the world is being overtaken by countries with ambitious investment programs for developments of dozens of modern airports. US airports are no longer ranked among the world's best by air travelers. General reports to the National Plan for an Integrated Airport System (NPIAS) continue to be at risk; as funding for upkeep and improvements remains limited."
The ASCE reported that, by many reliable estimates, the congestion and delays at US airports costs the commercial sector over $22 billion in lost revenue annually; and estimates that this figure will rise to $34 billion by the next decade. This is not even counting lost tourism and domestic travel revenue. This figure has been down since the TSA was established in 2001---for reasons well-known to every American traveler.
The report especially cited the failure to implement modern air traffic control technology. In 2003, President Bush authorized a upgraded high-tech system, which hasn't been acted upon since. Most airports are using obsolete radar-technologies which were approved by the Johnson Administration in the 1960s. Modern foreign airports employ GPS-satellite technologies. Not surprisingly, aircraft failures have also increased, with inspections increasingly underfunded.
The most recent data shows that US airports maintain a pathetic 79% on-time rate for airliners. Aviation's total economic impact has been steadily declining for almost two decades, with high fuel prices, security delays, and traffic congestion cited as the main reasons.
Maybe the US Media and political leaders should pay a little more attention to the overall condition of our airways before they start spouting off about gun control and other bogus 'security' harassment---none of which have achieved anything since 2001.
But what most likely will happen is that the public will continue dropping Prozac and listening to the Corporate Media. Airport shootings---like school and church shootings---can be just another 'New Normal' as degrading airport security measures and low-quality, overpriced airline service already has.
