Following the dynamic meeting between Presidents Putin and Trump; the President of China, Xi Jinping held a much-awaited meeting with the US leader. Relations between the two countries have hit a few roadblocks. The RINOs in the State and Defense Departments have continued Obama's policies of pressuring China by military and economic provocation.
Xi impressed upon Trump the futility of continuing these policies. He expressed considerably empathy, though, with Trump's position vis-à-vis his own. "The Sino-US relationship is determined by reality, not by tough rhetoric." said a spokesman for the Chinese Government, "Beijing is willing to develop stable ties with Washington and meanwhile stick to its bottom line on issues concerning his national interest. This has determined Beijing's attitude on matters that Washington is concerned about. The US' China policy---intertwined with different interests---is often unpredictable...Washington will gradually realize that Beijing has little room to make concessions in the face of US pressure."
Trump seemed more or less inclined to agree, calling the meeting 'excellent.' The main accomplishment of the meeting is that both countries agreed to set up a bilateral high-level commission to work out US-China economic policy and prevent escalations in tensions. This was a brilliant move on Trump's part. The new commission will allow Trump considerable latitude to deal with China pragmatically without pressure from American anti-China interests. The first meeting is scheduled for July 19th.
"There are still forces in US strategic circles calling for being tough on China. They like neither China nor Trump, and instigate Trump to counter China. They hope that the Washington-Beijing relationship will see major problems. The Trump Administration has not been as tough on China as expected. This annoys those who wanted to see more of Trump's aggressive personality displayed towards China."
Absolutely. Once again, the editors of The Global Times see the issue with twice the clarity of the US Corporate Media. Trump, as a businessman, completely understands the mentality of the Chinese leadership---which is essentially a corporation itself. The problem that Trump has encountered is that both the majority of his constituents and his enemies in the Deep State are deeply anti-Chinese. Obama especially hated and envied the Chinese owing to his childhood in Indonesia and days as a Chicago 'activist'. This came out in his foreign policy very clearly.
Trump and Xi are both economically-minded men who'd rather cooperate in mutually profitable trade than engage in a mutually destructive war. That could refer both to trade wars or military conflict. As Xi stated, this is reality, not rhetoric. We've reached a point in world history where Sino-US conflict is mutually assured destruction, whether hardliners on either side of the Pacific like it or not.
This isn't to say that Xi doesn't deal with anti-American elements in the CPC as well---there is still a strong Maoist faction in Chinese politics who are locked in a Cold War mentality. That's why this bilateral commission was such a master-stroke by Trump. It allows for a gradual---but necessary---thaw in relations much like the US-Soviet Détente pioneered by the Nixon Administration. We never had such a directed dialogue with China, but it is none to late to begin.
The two presidents also discussed North Korea, THAAD, and the pending Taiwan arms' deal. Nothing was really resolved on these issues other than a resolution by both parties to refrain from any unilateral actions. Overall, though, the meeting was a success and Xi Jinping clearly has greater respect for Trump than for Obama.
Trump also announced at G-20 that he planned to visit China sometime later this year for the two leaders' third summit in less than one year.
So what could be better news than Trump's diplomatic victories against the Deep State at the G-20? How about the news that ISIS' last major Iraqi stronghold has fallen to the Allies? There is jubilation and celebrating throughout Iraq tonight as news from the Front is pouring in that ISIS forces have surrendered Mosul after a nine-month battle.
The Battle of Mosul ended much the same as the Battle of Aleppo; a spearhead through the center of the ISIS lines split the enemy forces into pockets. The last few ISIS troops chose either 'martyrdom' or surrender---most preferred the latter course.
ISIS' defeat in Mosul means that the Eastern Theater of Operations in this war is essentially over. The few desert redoubts under ISIS occupation will be gone soon and Iraq will be free of the Jihadi Menace once and for all.
The Iraqi Government also hopes that their victories will end any further pretexts for Pentagon interference in their internal affairs. General James Mattis abandoned Iraq to ISIS on Obama's orders in 2014. Obama sent troops to Mosul again---over Iraqi objections---in 2016, to try and assume credit for ISIS' defeat. Iraqi forces refused to serve with Pentagon troops, and so our brave men and women in uniform were mostly confined to base doing photo-ops and occasionally interfering with Allied operations.
Commander Kareem Al-Nouri of the Shiite Militias stated that "Washington wants to have a share in the final victory announcement against ISIS and benefit from it. But I have to emphasize that this victory belongs to the Iraqi people and that the United States did not play any role in it."
The credit indeed belongs to the Iraqi people. After Mattis' poltroonery, 2/3 of the country fell to ISIS. The Iraqi Army was demoralized under a decade of Pentagon political correctness. Then, with Russian equipment and Chinese and Iranian advisors---and most importantly, the united support of the Iraqi people---the tide turned and turned rapidly. Iraqis formed militias: Shiite, Christian, Kurdish, and fought side-by-side with the Iraqi Army. In ISIS-held cities, men and women resisted ISIS, serving as snipers, saboteurs, and spies at the risk of their own lives.
Mosul was the first major city captured by ISIS and was the first capital of the so-called 'Islamic State'. ISIS Supreme Commander Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi proclaimed himself 'Caliph' there in 2014. The whereabouts of Baghdadi remain unknown; several witnesses reported seeing him in Mosul during the battle. Whether alive or dead, the 'Caliphate' is doomed; and that is the important thing.
RINO UN Ambassador Nikki Haley is once again undermining the President's foreign policy and usurping his authority. After a week of feuding between the White House and CNN, Haley appeared on that network to disparage the historic meeting between Presidents Putin and Trump before a hostile audience. This occurred only a few months after President Trump warned Haley to stop speaking out-of-turn.
After the meeting, both Trump and Putin acknowledged that the fake-news about Russian election-hacking had been discussed, and that Trump accepted Putin's denial. Even the Corporate Media is beginning to back off 'Russiagate'; especially since CNN itself was caught by Project Veritas fabricating most of their stories and sources for ratings.
So Haley instead betrayed the President by going to his avowed enemies and spinning the story as though Trump had covered up 'Russiagate' and demanded that Putin cease interfering.
"Everybody knows that Russia meddled in the election." Haley spouted the DNC talking-points, "They're not just doing this in the US, but in multiple countries to sow international chaos."
Haley also stated falsely that Trump accused Putin of election-meddling and demanded that he stop. She expressed hope that other nations would follow suit and begin resisting Russia.
This isn't the first time that Haley has sold out to Left-Wing interests. As governor of South Carolina, she initiated the nationwide ban on Confederate flag displays and supported the removal of historic Civil War monuments. She also came out in favor of Open Borders and was originally a supporter of Jeb Bush. As UN Ambassador, she's frequently presented false evidence---provided by Soros-funded front groups---against various countries like Syria and North Korea which have led to actual and near armed conflicts.
Republican Party and Conservative activists should not overlook this latest affront to President Trump. Haley crossed a definite line by going to the President's enemies and misrepresenting his position on Russia. We urge all Trump-supporters to demand that President and GOP leadership remove Nikki Haley from office at once and fill the UN seat with someone who supports the President and his positions.
President Trump today had an over two-hour meeting with President Vladimir Putin, the leader of the Free World and Defender of Christianity and Civilization. By many accounts, the meeting was highly productive as Trump sat awestruck in the presence of an experienced leader.
The Corporate Media---which hates Putin as passionately as they hate Trump---was barred from the closed-door meeting by the mutual agreement of both presidents. Putin did speak to the Russian media afterwards and said that he had a positive impression of Trump. They discussed such issues as the Syrian Civil War; the North Korean 'crisis'; Ukraine, illegally confiscated Russian diplomatic property; economic sanctions; and Russian nationals illegally detained in US jails.
It must have occurred to President Trump that every single one of these issues was instigated by his Deep State predecessors. That includes the phony 'Russiagate' scandals which the Corporate Media was quick to pounce upon---in spite of it being now exposed as a completely groundless hoax.
Putin also stressed to Trump that international affairs have been in limbo for the US generally because of the number of ambassadors yet to be replaced. 'Rainbow Rex' Tillerson---who hasn't replaced a single Obama-era ambassador nor changed State Department personnel in six months---must have blushed at Putin's suggestion.
Outside, in the streets of the degenerate city of Hamburg, German paramilitary forces were dealing with Soros-funded radicals who've been trying to sabotage the meeting with violent incidents. Water-cannons gave many Anarchists the first baths they've had in months. So far, the German police have lived up to their reputation for efficiency and prevented the peaceful protestors from inflicting too much damage. Their plans to disrupt the Summit have so far failed.
Trump's next meeting will be with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The Deep State pervert James Mattis has already attempted to provoke Xi---much as he did at Mar-a-Lago. The day before the Summit, Obama henchman Admiral Harry Harris sent the USS Stetham into Chinese territorial waters, provoking a near military clash. Today---before the Xi-Trump meeting---Harris intentionally violated Chinese airspace with long-range B-1 bombers.
Rainbow Rex and the dingbat UN Ambassador Nikki Haley have also been provoking China by trying to push through a Taiwanese arms-deal and instigating the mentally unstable Indian President Modi into provoking border incidents with China. Tillerson is also pushing trade-barriers again. Xi is going to have to be as firm with Trump as Putin was, while taking into account Trump's inexperience.
President Trump understands domestic issues very clearly. But his political inexperience ---while it benefits him domestically---is a major handicap in Geopolitics. Trump has allowed himself to be imposed upon by so-called 'experts'---i.e. Tillerson, Mattis, and McMaster---who really serve the interests of the Deep State. The G-20 so far has been a learning experience for Trump who is benefitting from the insight and experience of Putin and Xi.
The G-20 may give President Trump the impetus and insight needed to bring about a badly-needed reform in US Foreign Policy. Time will tell. But this is an excellent opportunity with superpowers Russia and China holding out the olive branch for the US to return to a position of international respect again.
The G-20 Summit meets in the once-proud city of Hamburg tomorrow. This is a far more critical meeting than last year's. President Trump is scheduled to meet with the leader of the Free World, Vladimir Putin.
The greatest challenge that Trump faces at this meeting is to ignore the blather of pundits and learn at the feet of a man who for the last two decades has fought boldly against the twin global scourges of degenerate Western Liberalism and the Wahhabi Jihadi cult. Putin must impress upon Trump that the US Deep State---represented in the Trump Administration by the treacherous Tillerson and his toadies McMaster and Mattis---are the common enemies of both countries. Trump would be well-advised to profit from Putin's experience in dealing with these types.
It's expected that Putin and Trump will discuss lifting sanctions and Syria policy. In both cases, Trump should follow Putin's lead. Putin has been successful in restoring order to Donbas and Crimea; as well as turning the tide against ISIS in Syria. In contrast, the US Deep State has caused chaos in all these places.
Putin will likely also address the NATO military provocations on Russia's Western border. Trump was inclined to withdraw from NATO during the campaign, something he should reconsider doing again. It would be far better for the world if the US, Russia, and China formed a military and economic alliance in defiance of entrenched vested interests who profit off war and economic instability.
Trump will also meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Sino-US relations are also deeply strained, again at the instigation of Trump's Deep State advisors.
What is important at this point in history is for the US leadership to exercise some humility and look to the future. It's time to scrap the outdated Cold War philosophies of John McCain and his ilk as well as the arrogant Pax Americana theories pushed by the Clintons and Bushmen. The US, Russia, and China are the three global superpowers and the interests of all three are mutually intertwined. If Trump heeds the good advice of Putin and Xi, we can look forward to an era of peace and prosperity as our nation formerly had prior to WW2 and the Cold War.
Sputnik News had an interesting article the other day about a growing relationship trend in the West. An increasing number of men, it seems, have decided that women can be replaced with machinery. To that end, machines designed to replicate human females are being designed and developed and technology is apparently speeding up their life-like qualities.
The Sputnik article focuses on Japan---where the mischief first started---but the whole concept has been floating around the Manosphere and its Red Pill Cult for some time. The first of these androids was developed by Japanese robotics engineer who actually married his prototype, Michiko. He went on to found his own company; and according to the article gets about 2,000 orders annually in the Japanese Empire alone. In spite of the fact that Japanese women are regarded as among the world's most beautiful and intelligent females, Japanese men have never really valued them much. Their Shinto Cult is only concerned with women's abilities to breed warriors and workers for the Emperor. Fortunately however for normal Western men, Japanese affluence and female legal equality allows these lovelies to escape to other lands and marry Westerners---which they do in large numbers.
But not all Western men are normal; and despite the mutual racial hatred, the Shintos and Red Pills have a respectful admiration for each other. Vox Day, for example, rhapsodizes endlessly about a future "god-emperor on his cherry-blossom throne." Like Hirohito. The Shintos even have their own version of MGTOW, for some reason the term translates as Grazers, or Grass-Eaters. Both philosophies are deeply racist, despise femininity, and fetishize the so-called 'Alpha' male. Both are also prone to violent fanaticism: it was the Japanese who first employed suicide bombers as a war tactic; among other barbarities copied by modern terrorists.
So it's hardly surprising that the Red Pill kooks fantasize about the day when women will become obsolete. Eve---created by God---isn't good enough for them; hence they must re-create women in their own image instead. The idea isn't even new with them; Hollywood produced a few comedies on the subject:
But no matter how one slices it; we're essentially describing here a technologically advanced form of Autoeroticism. If, as some Manospherians predict, future machines will have even more advanced capabilities like Artificial Intelligence, Artificial wombs, and volitional motility, they are still going to be machines, and nothing more. The idea really can't appeal to anyone except those with deeply narcissistic personalities. Real women are mysterious, intriguing, and attractive because they have souls. Robots simply do as programmed. As embarrassing as it is for the Red Pills to admit this; even transgender women would be a better choice than a robot.
These are not even flesh-and-blood women, but constructed of silicone and electric wires. I cannot imagine that combination is an especially sexually attractive smelling one. Silicone is used for things like repairing tires and caulking bathtubs. It has a distinctive smell that is difficult to remove---like the inside of boats and camping trailers where it is also extensively used.
Narcissism is very apparent in the statements made by the Japs about their 'relationships'. "Human beings are so demanding." one complained, "People always want something from you like money or commitment."
Of course, provision and commitment are what separates men from boys, but some never grow out of this mindset.
"I'll never date a real woman again. They're heartless." another noted, apparently oblivious to the fact that robots don't have hearts.
Proponents of artificial women believe in hypergamy---hence they imagine that robots will lack this trait; again oblivious to the fact that it doesn't exist in human females either. With artificial intelligence---i.e. computers for brains---robots may make logical choices which might involve infidelity.
This is why these subjects were always portrayed in Hollywood comedies; never dramas. A real relationship between a human and a robot is impossible on any level.
The obvious flaw in Red Pill logic is assuming that---since they are perfect---a robot programmed by them will be perfect too. What will happen instead is that all their negative attitudes will get transferred to a machine. In real life, a partner compliments her other; she has qualities he lacks (and vice-verse) so in that sense can compensate where a man is lacking. A robot instead will reinforce such negative traits. Thus once again, the Red Pills are going to be 'out-gamed' because---as always---they are their own worst enemies.
Red Pill ringleader Andrew Anglin of The Daily Stormer wasn't celebrating Independence Day, but he was celebrating nonetheless. A 33 year-old celebrity named Stevie Ryan---who'd been struggling with clinical depression---committed suicide by hanging over the weekend. The Red Pill Cult, with Anglin in the lead, are gloating over this tragedy like a bunch of cannibals dancing around a stew-pot.
Stevie Ryan, from what I've read of her, was a self-made star. She was popular on Youtube before going to Hollywood. We don't know much of her personal history, but experience has taught us that whoever the Red Pills gang up upon probably has a number of redeeming qualities.
Anglin---who in contrast has no redeeming qualities---says of Miss Ryan: "I salute Stevie for doing what needed to be done. All childless 30+ women want to die, as their lives have no meaning. They are past the age when men give a s--t about them, and they are without any purpose in their lives...I hope that more childless women over 30 will begin hanging themselves, so that young women can see that {edited: a vulgar Red Pill term for a 'hypergamous' slut} all through their 20s has an extremely high price tag. But of course no one tells women that when they hit 30 their magic powers to command men are gone; and all they are left with is a dried-up womb with nobody to love them. And obviously women are way too f-----g stupid to figure that s--t out by themselves. But a wave of suicides by prominent childless old maids might get the discussion started!"
Anglin's solution for this dilemma is to impose White Sharia on the United States; that is, marrying off daughters to willing husbands. This of course has never been practiced or was ever established law in the US. Outside of royal families, most of Western Civilization gave up this practice sometime during the 12th or 13th Century. Our allegedly uncivilized ancestors also tended to frown on people who celebrated and advocated suicide.
The Red Pills and many in the Alt-Right consider Anglin an authority on Christianity. Whatever he is, Christian he is not. Hatred has blinded both him and his disciples to the point where they've become parodies of themselves and they can't even see it. Everything that he wrote in the passage above is a description of what he and his followers have turned themselves into; and they project all of this self-loathing onto women like the unfortunate Miss Ryan. If we examine the characters of the Third Reich, we see that they engaged in exactly the same kind of projection: which likely explains the natural affinity between Nazi and Red Pill philosophies.
Conservative and Christian leaders need to expose these false philosophies. Like many of us over a certain age, we probably assumed that these tendencies died out after the Second World War. What we've forgotten are the facts made clear during the War Crimes trials of the late 1940s. It's a short step from the kind of cruelty and viciousness in language to the same words being translated into actions. The Nazi experiment showed the truth of the old maxim that we are never but a generation or two from Barbarism. When Anglin says that women over 30 are useless and should die, there is no shortage among his readers who'd gladly carry out a policy like that should it ever become law. The Word is father to the Deed and always has been.
