FAKE NEWS HAS INTERNATIONAL CONSEQUENCES

      The recent decision of a handful of Western countries---including the US and Canada---to expel Russian diplomats has had only a minimal impact in geopolitics, despite the flurry of fake-news surrounding the story. The expulsion did cause considerable indignation in Russia---coinciding with a National Day of Mourning declared by President Putin following a deadly catastrophe in Kemerevo on Sunday. 

       The Trump Administration expelled 60 diplomats. The whole action, though, was based on the fake-news that Russia assassinated a former spy in Britain. This story has been debunked several times. It's about as credible a story as the allegations alleging Russian involvement in the 2016 Elections.

        This has been a serious problem within the Trump Administration. The worst decision that Trump has made was ordering a cruise-missile strike on Syria last Spring---during an official visit with the President of China, no less. That was based on the fake-news that the Syrian Air Force used chemical weapons against civilians. The chemical weapons nonsense was always a fraud. Syria never signed the UN treaty banning chemical weapons; but we never hear that small detail mentioned by the Corporate Media. 

        We've also exposed several incidents of fake news---or at least news from very dubious sources---about North Korea. The Trump Administration came within a hairs-breadth of war with that country last year. 

         Here's the problem: fake-news served the interests, agendas and objectives of the Obama, Bush, and Clinton Administrations quite admirably. The fake stories about Serbian atrocities; the phony WMD-menace from Iraq; the Arab Spring; the Maidan Uprising in Ukraine: all of these were distractions calculated to distract Americans from problems at home and to advance the vested financial interests of the Deep State abroad. 

          The Trump Administration has to understand this---that the day and purposes of American military intervention abroad is over. We need to invest in our defense and security. Countries like Serbia, Bosnia, Iraq, and Libya were no threat to the US then; and countries like Yemen, Iran, and North Korea aren't today. The only countries really capable of fighting the US in a head-on war are Russia, China, and possibly India. And all three of these countries would prefer peaceful co-existence and free-trade to war. 

          In other words, Trump needs to start applying the same skills and out-of-the-box thinking in foreign policy that he's used so successfully in domestic policy. Forget the Pax Americana nonsense pushed by the Clintonistas and the RINOs. We have to look to our own affairs first: and an alliance with the other world powers would facilitate that tremendously. 

ANARCHIST CHUMPS FLOCK TO PHOTO-OP MARCH

      The latest fashionable trend among the Whacko Left Wing seems to be organizing and participating in stupid 'protest marches'. This trend really started late in Obama's term, but has become an especially useful propaganda tactic for the political and media forces opposed to President Trump---and to freedom generally. 

      Most recently we saw flash-mobs knocking down statues and bitter harridans and cadres of male feminists walking around with artificial vaginas on their heads (illustrating of course where their brains are). Before that, we saw effete white trust-fund babies rallying for Black Lives Matter and on behalf of illegal immigrants. 

       The latest act of Leftist mass-insanity was an event ridiculously called March for Our Lives. Of course, the whole event was orchestrated by Left-Wing interest groups but posed as 'millions' of young adults protesting for stricter gun control laws. The catalyst for this event was the Parkland School mass-murder which was committed by a thug with an illegally-owned weapon. The police---whom the Liberals argue should alone have access to guns---in this instance ran away. 

       Thus we have typical Liberal logic. The Gun Laws that were supposed to stop nutcases like Nicholas Cruz from obtaining a firearm were not enforced: and those government agencies who are supposed to stop such attacks fled the scene. The Liberal solution therefore is that we need even more government oversight. 

        And the same Left who want to regulate guns also protest every police-involved shooting. They ought simply to confess that they are pro-crime. 

        Some might argue that, with modern weapons, the 2nd Amendment is obsolete. They argue that civilian militias couldn't impact a modern army. But we've seen this theory disproved in the Middle East in both Syria and Iraq.

        Before the rise of ISIS, Syria had fairly lenient gun laws, but guns were taxed and too expensive for the average person to own. In Syria, ISIS took over and massacred entire villages like Zara and Al-Quaryatayn. 

         In Iraq, one of the positive things brought by American Occupation was a respect for the principles of the 2nd Amendment and the establishment of a 'gun culture.' Civilian militias not only fought ISIS side-by-side with the Iraqi Army, but ISIS took tremendous casualties from civilian snipers within ISIS-occupied cities. ISIS' second-in-command, Omar the Chechen was killed by a sniper as were the head of the secret police, their propaganda chief, their head of suicide-bombing units, as well as several other ISIS officials and military commanders. A few small villages were liberated before the Iraqi Army arrived, by the armed inhabitants.

          So why does the Left really hate the 2nd Amendment? It is because they could never impose the kind of regime they desire on America as long as the people can resist them with force. This is not a radical idea at all; but one enshrined by our Founding Fathers. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story stated in 1832 that:

           "The right of the citizenry to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a free republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary powers of rulers."

            And not only that, but our Founding Fathers revived and modified an earlier British Law, from the reign of King William III in the 1688 Bill of Rights:

          "That our subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their condition and as allowed by law." Which, as Story notes, had become a dead letter in England by his day. Our Founding Fathers understood that disarmament leads to oppression. 

             But the ignoramuses marching today never hear about the Founding Fathers, Judge Story, or the English Constitution from any of their even more ignorant teachers. The worst school massacre in US history was carried out with dynamite. Evil men are not going to be deterred by laws. Modern Academia thinks that we can stop evil by wishing it out of existence. But the force of evil is only stopped with a superior force. And that's why the media and academia really don't want it stopped at all.

SUICIDES AND THE RED PILL PHILOSOPHY

     There's an interesting thread at the Ex-Red Pill Subreddit where a fellow tells a poignant story about how his encounter with the Red Pills nearly drove him to suicide. 

     "I came across the Red Pill and for some reason a lot of what they were saying seemed true." he writes, "There are definitely good things in there like improving yourself, but what really stood out to me was the idea that marriage was a terrible thing and that no woman will ever love you like you want to be loved. That modern-day marriages don't work any more because modern women don't need to rely on men any more and can divorce husbands quite easily and take them for everything they own. This may seem good at the start of a relationship, but all women eventually lose attraction to their husbands."

       The writer of this article explained how he was a child of divorce and wanted something better for himself. I don't think that he realized this; but these are exactly the kinds of vulnerable men upon whom the Red Pill Cult preys. He tells of the consequences:

      "This struck me in a really bad way. I felt sick to my stomach; I had swallowed TRP and realized that everything that I had wanted in life was a facade and that I no longer saw a purpose in living. I was so f-----g miserable that I seriously thought of ending it all." 

      Fortunately, this young fellow came across some anti-Red Pill sites and the scales fell from his eyes just in time. But we do have to wonder how many similar stories don't end so happily. With the sky-high rates of male suicide in the US, it can't be doubted that a fair number of them are driven to despair by what they've been taught by the Cult. 

       Granted, the anti-male zeitgeist of our postmodern dystopia has made relationships much harder to obtain than in the past: but we also have to keep in mind that anti-male doesn't necessarily translate to pro-female. The cultural 'elites' are mostly very psychologically twisted sexual perverts who have a hatred of heterosexuality and complimentarianism in general. While men are being socially prevented from acting according to their nature; women are being pushed into social roles for which they have no capacity. The result is a Culture of Sexual Despair where men are frustrated and women feeling inadequate. Into that void steps the Gay Mafia, telling us that the homosexual lifestyle is superior; and that 'enlightened' people join it. 

         The Red Pills---whether or not they'll admit it---play right into that anti-heterosexual narrative. They are no more friendly to men than Feminists are to women. Both sides teach that neither gender needs the other; and in fact that the other gender is expendable. This is the Militant Homosexual agenda in a nutshell. It's no wonder that both the Red Pills and Feminists have 'gays' lurking around in both their leaderships.

        Thus Red Pill Cultists like Jack Donovan and his homosexual biker-gang or our suicidal young friend are two logical outcomes of TRP. Just as the large number of young women drawn to Lesbianism and the scandalous rates of female addiction to antidepressants are the logical outcome of Feminism. Men and women are drawn to one another---in fact, need one another---each has qualities the other gender lacks. And vice-versa each gender has deficiencies for which the other compensates. 

        The writer of the Reddit piece had a happy ending:

        "Thank God I took the Blue Pill and came to my senses. It now seems so stupid that I believed in that TRP s--t. I believe that there are some good attraction tips out there, but the majority of it is toxic and ignores all the happy marriages out there. Here's to being a 'Beta.'"





         

TRUMP BOOTS OUT OBAMA TOADY McMASTER

       More good---but long overdue---news from the White House. Less than a week after ejecting the RINO Tillerson, the President today fired H.R. McMaster as National Security Adviser. He is being replaced with career diplomat and international intelligence specialist. John Bolton.

        McMaster was another problem for the Administration. Many suspect that he was the source behind several leaks. Also there is considerable suspicion that McMaster supplied Trump with false evidence against his predecessor, General Flynn. What is not in any doubt is that McMaster supplied Trump with bad intelligence and terrible advice. 

       And small wonder. McMaster was first and foremost loyal to his ex-boss, Obama. When Obama opened the military to homosexuals, McMaster was put in charge of implementing the policy. He favored all of Obama's foreign policies and tried to extend them into the Trump Administration. 

        Like his chum, Rainbow Rex Tillerson, McMaster held over numerous Obama-appointed officials. As recently as last Autumn, almost all key NSA positions were led by Obama/Clinton appointees. 

         The NSA is in desperate need of swamp-draining. Bolton may be the man to do this. While he is hawkish on foreign policy, he is also a traditional Conservative in his attitude towards government administration. He will clean out the nest of DNC vipers that McMaster's pals in the Deep State created. 

         

TEXAS BOMBER TAKEN DOWN

       The mad bomber behind a series of apparently random attacks in the Austin/San Antonio area met his doom last night, thanks to the heroic action of some unidentified police officers. A manhunt involving local, federal police and the Texas Rangers culminated in the issue of a warrant for one Mark Conditt, an unemployed computer technician. Conditt attempted to escape and---at the risk of their own lives---police followed and forced him off the road. Conditt's car exploded: it's unknown at this point whether he detonated a car bomb or a police bullet struck an explosive device. 

      No matter, the explosion sent the 'Mad Bomber of Austin' to Tartarus; saving taxpayers the expense of a media-circus trial. 

       The Corporate Media, however, along with the usual vulgar Leftist trolls, are besides themselves with joy to learn that Conditt was a White male apparently from a Conservative Christian background and not a Left-Wing nutcase, as per usual. This is all in spite of the fact that voter-rolls show that Conditt never declared a political party, nor voted in any election. And---the very Liberal Austin Police Chief has stated already that they have a taped confession from Conditt which indicates that political or religious motivations were not behind the attacks. CNN---for whatever their words are worth---did note in passing that the two police officers injured in the final showdown were 'white males'. 

       The real story here though isn't about Conditt, though the Corporate Media will give him---like they do all other mass-murderers---24/7 attention while ignoring his victims and the efforts of good men in bringing down this menace to society. That notoriety naturally encourages even more psychos to try and top the last attack. The Russians learned this after the Beslan School Massacre in 2004. The Russian Media agreed with the government to prohibit sensationalism of these event. The results have been that such attacks have virtually ceased in Russia while they've increased virtually exponentially here. 

       Unlike the Russian Media, though, we can't expect American journalists to engage in responsible behavior. What we can do is ignore those jugheads and focus on the efforts of real heroes who did what it took to bring the Mad Bomber's career to a conclusion. Even though our society puts down men as potential rapists and male pigs, it took considerable stones (as we used to call it) to charge a car-bomb. In fact, on Monday we saw a semi-retired painter do the same thing. and the very next day, a police officer stopping another psycho bent on a wholesale massacre. Not a bad week at all for those of us who are needed like a fish needs a bicycle.

       Even more fascinating was how these diverse law enforcement agencies tracked Conditt down in the first place. Conditt made two serious blunders that led to his ultimate downfall (not counting his abortive escape attempt). The first took some real investigative skills to uncover. As part of the detonator, Conditt employed a type of battery not manufactured or widely available in the US. A sharp investigator noted that, which led police to find who had purchased these devices online. Conditt's second mistake was using Home Depot and similar stores to buy other materials. Police began monitoring surveillance videos of purchasers of such items. Now, Conditt always wore a disguise---but a suspicious and very alert Home Depot employee followed him outside and got his license number. Conditt was on the list of suspects from the battery-purchases. And that was that. 

        Good men doing good things and working as a team: maybe if our culture celebrated that instead of holding up the Conditts of the world as typically male, we'd see fewer like him and more like the 'two White males' who brought him down at last. 

PUTIN COASTS TO RUSSIAN ELECTORAL VICTORY

       Russian voters on Sunday resoundingly re-elected Vladimir Putin to his position as President. Putin was opposed both by old-line Communist candidates and Soros-backed Liberal candidates: none of whom even came close to unseating the popular leader. The Election of 2018 was marked by much less violence and controversy than in 2012. This reflects the new attitude of American leaders---who refrained this time from electoral interference. 

       It will be interesting to see how Putin's place in geopolitics will unfold during the next six years. With the downfall of both ISIS and the American Deep-State, Putin has indicated that his next term will be more focused on carrying out internal Russian reforms. His anti-corruption campaigns and social reform policies have already lifted Russia from the economic recession of the 1990's. Yet unemployment---and underemployment---remain a serious problem. 

        Workforce productivity is "a key issue" according to Putin. But he also noted that correcting Russia's infrastructure issues must be a top priority if that is to occur. In this respect, Russia is like the US in that most of its infrastructure dates from the Cold-War Era and is in need of modernization. 

          Though Putin did not mention Trump's Foreign Policy, it was clearly implied in his acceptance speech that the thawing of US-Russian relations would shift spending away from Defense. "There will be no increase in defense spending; no arms-race." he told his supporters. "We have everything we need in this field, in addition to a major reserve capacity." 

         In contrast to previous administrations, President Trump has put very little emphasis on Foreign Affairs. Trump's inclinations seem more geared towards international trade than towards cultural imperialism. Putin can step back somewhat from his position as leader of the free world. The challenge of the next six years will be to work with Trump on geopolitical issues. Obama-Era sanctions are still in place; and Trump was unable to pressure Senate RINOs into lifting them. Trump also is challenged in that his foreign policy team in general is strongly anti-Russian. 

        But Trump and Putin both have a good relationship with China; and it may be that President Xi could negotiate a better rapport between them. A US-Russia-China Alliance would be the best step forward for world peace and prosperity since the end of WW2. 

         We shall see how matters unfold; but the Russian people's confidence in Putin's leadership is a positive sign. 

DALROCK AND THE FALSE VALUES OF GAME

      Manosphere writer Dalrock has penned a new article titled Why Game is a Threat to Our Values, which has received considerable acclaim from members of the Red Pill Cult. To explain briefly, 'Game' is a pseudoscience supposedly offering new 'revelations' about gender relations. Dalrock and other Manosphereans have grafted these notions on to a skeletal framework of religion and posit that they are bringing back some 'original' form of Christianity. In reality, their 'Christianity' is an admixture of Gnosticism and pop-psychology with a good measure of Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and Rand thrown in. 

      What Dalrock argues in his latest tome is that concepts like chivalry and its concomitant social valuation of women has corrupted society and that Game is destroying these values. "As a Christian," he writes, "the destruction of these values can't happen soon enough." Which of course echoes the same desires as the Cultural Marxists and the Radical Feminists. But it doesn't square with actual Christianity---in which Christ taught respect for females and often protected them from abuse. 

      Part of the problem for Dalrock and the other cultists is that the see Christianity through the lens of Game---when they should be evaluating Game through the lens of Christianity. Game is their real religion whether or not they choose to admit that fact. Thus Dalrock's article is filled with subjective assertions based on his own faulty conceptions of reality. 

      As an example, he first asserts that Feminism is dependent upon male chivalry (a male feminist argument); and then says: "But while chivalry is closely related to how we measure the virtue of a man, a man's chivalry is not in itself how we measure a man's virtue. In our society a man proves his virtue by his ability to seduce women."

     What society is this guy talking about? Look around and ask how many monuments or holidays we've bestowed on men who were great seducers of women. There are none: absolutely none. Yes, it is true that some of our great men had pronounced sexual magnetism: but we don't honor them for that. Our society values men and celebrates their virtues on the basis of their accomplishments. Granted, Political Correctness may distort some actual accomplishments; but the general principle is the same. The difference is simply that the PC crowd honors the depraved achievements of wicked men. 

     Dalrock also explains that romantic love is nothing more than sexual desire: which is the same position that Orthodox Marxists hold. "As a society we're obsessed with generating sexual attractiveness in women" he asserts, as though feminine cultivation of physical attractiveness is some recent phenomenon, "We see this ability as the most pure test of goodness in a man. A woman's feelings of sexual attraction are a mystical force, godlike for non-Christians and God's message for Christians." This is not true at all: our society is deeply hostile to heterosexuality---especially where it concerns men. But he continues: "We can't see how incredibly crass this is because we call it romantic love, but romantic love is more deeply intertwined with sexual desire than many are willing to admit."

      Under the Khmer Rouge Regime, Dictator Pol Pot held the same attitude and actually instituted official 'mating seasons' for his subjects. Now again, Dalrock is not only spouting Marxism, his assertion is essentially the Gnostic position that there is nothing holy about matrimony and that sexuality is morally indifferent. 

      Besides that, his assertion this passage also implies that men are never romantically attracted to women. This again stems from his reductionist perspective from Game: that attraction and sexuality is purely physical with no other component attached. In his cult it's commonly taught that Eve---not the Devil---caused Adam's Fall. One can easily see the latent homosexual overtones of building a philosophy around the core idea that females are the downfall of men.

      "As I've already noted," he continues on, "Chivalry is what converts Feminist demands into concrete action." No it isn't. Feminist demands are converted into concrete action when political and economic interests see profit in giving into them. "The threat from Game is comes from its assault on the belief that chivalry is sexy and therefore chivalry is virtuous."

      Dalrock's thinking is completely screwed up. The latter passage shows again that sex is the motivation for what we call chivalry and nothing could be further from the truth. The reason that civilized peoples practice respect for and protection of women is that women form, collectively, a vital social polarity which men must defend if civilization is to survive. Not understanding this very basic sociological concept is the danger posed both by the Red Pills and by the Feminists. 

       Even some of the most primitive cultures understand what Dalrock can't seem to grasp. Ancient peoples used to obliterate rival tribes by taking their women as spoils of war. Not only did losing their women cause these tribes to collapse, it strengthened the dominant tribes by bolstering the feminine social polarity. 

      The old values held for centuries and they are still the best. And I think that we can safely assume that they will outlive both Feminism and the Red Pill Cult. 

                                                       Manly Alpha Leaders in Action