FBI LEVELS HUGE OPIOID RING

     The town of Huntington, West Virginia has been described as the epicenter of the national opioid crisis in a recent documentary produced by Elaine Sheldon. The overdose death rate there is fully 10 times the national average. But yesterday, in a series of sweeps, the FBI and teams from local law enforcement destroyed the largest distribution network into the city.

      The drug-pushing operation was run by the Peterson Brothers of Detroit, Michigan. They had been operating this ring for 15 years; but only since the Trump Administration were they uncovered and investigated. According to Federal Attorney Michael Stuart, a quarter-million doses of Fentanyl was seized along with large quantities of other narcotics.

      According to authorities, Willie 'Chill' Peterson secured the drugs in Detroit, and passed them to his brother, Manget 'Money' Peterson in West Virginia. Manget Peterson, the leader of the ring, was the at hub of the pipeline and controlled at least 70 distribution networks. 

       "Let me point out that today's raids were not picking up addicts or street-level dealers."  Stuart told WCHS-8, "This is severe disruption in the supply network into Huntington. It's a potential game-changer."

       Stuart encouraged addicts in Huntington to seek out treatment centers since the supply of Opioid-based narcotics has been extremely curtailed. The area is part of President Trump's new Quick Response Program which follows up on overdose victims and tries to get them into drug treatment. The new program also repealed Obamacare restrictions on police and EMT personnel administering an antidote to overdose victims. The number of overdose deaths in Huntington has declined significantly, according to WEPM-Radio 1340. 

        And so far from the glamorous and tough image that Hollywood depicts of drug kingpins and gang-leaders, 'Money' Peterson was allegedly quite the coward when captured. Authorities were prepared for a potential shootout, but Petersen nearly died of fright when the FBI appeared and had to be supported while led, begging the agents to let him go. It may or may not be a true story, but Peterson's photos show him as a short, squabby guy who looks like he's afraid of his own shadow.

        
         There's really nothing about narcotics trafficking that's ever been like Hollywood depicts it. It's always been, and still is, the domain of the lowest type of criminal.  
      

       

LIBERALS ON THEIR THRONES

       Today is the national deadline for filing income taxes in the United States. A lot of us are benefiting already from the first round of President Trump's tax reforms. Was the top headline today? No... 

      Maybe the Corporate Media is talking about the repercussions of the missile attack on Syria---especially its dismal failure? No. Maybe the Opioid Crisis? No; even though one of the largest Opioid rings in recent history was wiped out today. Or maybe the legacy of former First Lady Barbara Bush, who died today? Nope.

        No: the biggest and most pressing concern in the Corporate Media today is about the 'injustice' of a Philadelphia Starbucks' cafe not permitting two non-paying customers access to their bathrooms. This major social issue and obvious national emergency has led to apologies from Starbucks', as well as riots and some urban unrest. 

         The question is: what is this strange obsession Liberals have with toilets?  The last two years of the Obama Administration saw a huge national controversy over public bathrooms. Obama even spent millions retrofitting bathrooms on Navy warships to address this important and burning issue; and was even threatening to withhold federal funds to states which wouldn't adopt his bathroom policies. 

         Dr. Sigmund Freud and some of the followers of his school of thought believed that a variety of mental illnesses stemmed from a morbid fixation of defective toilet-training in childhood. Dr. Erich Fromm, who was one of Freud's students, was a strong proponent of that theory. During WW2, Fromm submitted a report to Allied Intelligence stating his professional opinion that Nazi SS Chief Heinrich Himmler was anally fixated. He expanded on this theory in his later book, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, wherein he postulated a connection between anal fixation and the often sadistic behavior of government bureaucrats. 

          We may shrug off this theory at first glace: but when one goes through a typical West Coast, Liberal-run city like San Francisco and notice how indescribably filthy they are---including filth from human waste--- then one has to consider whether or not the Psychoanalysts might not have a valid point. 

        Whatever Liberals' psychological motivations might be, we have to admit this kind of behavior is really weird. But then again, it's just the American Left being themselves...

         

        

THE IDES OF APRIL

      So the President has done what we'd hoped that he would not do: joined the NATO butchers in an attack against Syria to bolster the sagging fortunes of ISIS and Al-Qaeda. There was hope that after Tillerson and McMaster were disgraced, that we'd see a shift away from Deep-State Foreign Policy. It didn't happen.

     The attacks were launched by Mattis' gay-friendly naval fleet and by US forces illegally still in Syria at the occupied Al-Tanf base. Over 100 missiles were launched against Damascus and other civilian targets in a cowardly, sneak attack just before dawn, local time. 

     Allied news sources claim that most of these missiles were shot by Syrian Air Defense, who did a remarkable job. The NATO cowards prudently by-passed Russian-manned Air Defense systems. The Syrians took out billions in US weaponry with Soviet-made equipment. Generation Snowflake flops again...I suppose that this is predictable when your Defense Secretary publicly admits that he had no proof of a chemical attack; but feels like one really happened.

      But that good news aside, we haven't any preliminary figures on how many were murdered by our government and its confederates in tonight's attack. The citizens of Damascus itself took to the streets in several demonstrations supporting President Assad and congratulating Syrian soldiers. Despite whatever propaganda we'll hear from the Corporate Media, here are some scenes from Damascus this morning illustrating just how successful the NATO assassins were at turning public opinion against Assad:

        President Bashir Assad and his family were unharmed. President Assad even appeared at the Presidential Palace this morning; and urged his country to remain steadfast and thanked the Syrian people for their patriotism. 

          This mission overall seems quite clearly to have been a failure. The larger question now is what repercussions this attack will have on the US globally. The Trump Administration has, sadly, put us in a bad spot. This is the result of listening to the 'Pax Americana'/ Might-Makes-Right Crowd who think that the only diplomacy the US really needs is the ability to bomb anyone into submission. Now we look even weaker than before: both morally and militarily. 

CONSERVATISM VS. LEFTIST INTERVENTIONISM

           "We Americans have no commission from God to police the world. Let those who would die for the flag on foreign battlefields give a better proof of their patriotism and give greater glory to their country by promoting brotherhood and justice."---President Benjamin Harrison, 1888. 

         Thanks largely to our dysfunctional public school system, few Americans know much about our 23rd President. But Benjamin Harrison is significant because he was the first Conservative---in the modern sense of the term---to be elected president. In the late 19th Century, there was a political movement called Progressivism. The Progressives believed in a larger, more proactive government. Inspired by some European politicians and discouraged by the recent US Civil War; they felt that the Constitutional emphasis on individual rights and economic free-enterprise had become antiquated. They desired us to become more like the corporatist and imperialist European systems; much as modern Progressives wish us to follow European socialism and cultural imperialism.

        The Progressives' political opponents back then had a slogan about 'conserving' the principles of our Founding Fathers. The media began referring to them as Conservatives and the name has been around ever since. 

         For our purposes, with the Administration considering another illegal and ill-thought out attack on Syria, it should be noted that this type of intervention is not a Conservative position---the number of RINOs supporting it to the contrary. When Benjamin Harrison made the speech quoted above; he was referring to the very principles laid down by George Washington. (Harrison, BTW, was inaugurated on the 100th Anniversary of Washington's Inauguration). 

           The Founders and the earlier political leaders restricted our military to our own hemisphere and to the Pacific Islands. The reason for this was to encourage foreign trade without the intrigues and entanglements of foreign power-politics. The warnings coming from Russia about a Syrian Intervention should not be ignored, as too many do. 

          Global conflicts have started because it's completely unpredictable where one power is going to choose to draw a line and react. Some pundits snort that Russia won't go to WW3 over Syria. But how do they know this? Obama came within a hair's-breadth of a world war in 2016 because he didn't think that China would fight for the Nansha Islands. 

         In WW2,  Hitler didn't believe that Britain and France would fight for Poland. Stalin didn't believe that the Nazis would invade Russia. Roosevelt didn't believe that the Japanese would dare attack US territory. WW1 started from a whole chain of miscalculations like these. 

          Ever since the Soviet Union fell in 1991, Russia has been double-crossed by series of US Presidents promising a 'Reset in Russian Relations' and then cynically betraying Russian trust. Russia very well may react over a Syrian attack with the ferocity of people who feel they've been pushed and goaded once too often. And Russia's allies China, Iran, and India may not sit idly by either.

          The question Trump needs to consider is not whether Russia will go to war over Syria; but whether the US thinks that Syria is worth risking the start of a world war. 

 

Coming Soon to a Neighborhood Near You?

DON'T DO IT, MR. PRESIDENT

    Once again the situation is heating up in the Middle East. Despite evidence proving that the Syrian Government was not behind an alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma last week, RINO Nikki Haley and the Pax Americana crowd began pushing for military 'retaliation.' 

     French President Macron has also been gulled by the Soros-funded White Helmets and the Al-Qaeda funded Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Macron seems to be leaning on Trump for moral support and egging him on to attack at the same time. Macron, it should be noted, has an ulterior motive here. During his presidential campaign, he brought back a Bushism: "I am not a wimp." Then, with ISIS nearing collapse he safely promised to attack Syria if chemical weapons were used. Now Macron---an inexperienced leader---thinks that he has to save face by doing something.

      The problem though is twofold. First, Syria didn't deploy chemical weapons and Syria is allied with Russia, China, and Iran who would be especially displeased with France. And France is economically tied to all three countries. 

        The second problem is that military experts are questioning whether or not France actually has the military capability anymore to launch an operation like that unilaterally. The French Military isn't what it used to be in the days of Beau Geste. In other words, Macron needs Trump for cover. Even if he pulls this off, it won't succeed for him politically in France because everybody will see that France is a paper tiger. And it won't help Trump politically either; because he would essentially be doing what his political opponents favor him doing. 

         Don't do it, Mr. President. Who really wants 'regime change' in Syria? The crooks at the DNC; EU bureaucrats; shady contractors who'd profit from rebuilding the country; ISIS and Al-Qaeda; George Soros; international drug traffickers and white-slavers; and the Corporate Media. Are these the people whom Trump and Macron want in their teams?

         As Russian UN Ambassador Vasily Nebenzia said: "If you have made a decision to carry out an illegal military endeavor, we hope that you will come to your senses. You will bear the responsibility of it yourselves."

         

APPOMATTOX ANNIVERSARY

      153 years ago today was the first day of a new era in American History. A conspiracy to break up the Union and the bloodiest war we've seen either before or since had ended the day before. Thousands of broken men were liberated from death-camps like Andersonville. The slavery issue, too, was settled once and for all. The Southern Aristocracy gave way to the Democracy which we all now have.

       Sadly, Americans' jubilation was short-lived; for five days later, President Lincoln was gunned down in cold blood by one of the partisans of the Southern Aristocracy. 

       Today it's become somewhat fashionable to support the so-called 'Confederacy' and deride the memory of Lincoln. But people forget that the U.S. Civil War was the decisive battle between democracy and despotism on our own shores. For the first 90 years of our independence, the Southeastern states were more closely modeled on European feudalism than the republican ideals of the Constitution.

        After our victory in the American Revolution, there were those who wanted to establish a monarchy in this country. Washington was offered the crown and refused it. He began the precedent of presidents serving only two terms. When George III tried to reconquer us in 1812; the Southern politicians obstructed our war efforts fearing that annexation of Canada would bring in more anti-slavery and anti-aristocratic sentiments. 

        In 1832, South Carolina threatened to secede over a tariff on cotton. President Jackson backed them down with his forceful leadership. A similar threat happened in 1850 when an attempt to secede was put down by President Taylor. Between then and 1861, the anti-government conspiracy went into overdrive. Southern politicians like Jefferson Davis used their positions to set up the South and weaken the North. Davis was Defense Secretary under President Pierce. He loaded West Point with Southerners and moved arsenals South. By 1860, the Southern Aristocracy had made it clear what would happen if the Election of 1860 didn't go as they wanted. They were the first 'not my president' crowd. 

         And they were also every bit as vicious and tyrannical as the current anti-government gangs. One of the first acts of the Confederate Government was to confiscate the property of anybody who opposed secession. Thousands of people were literally driven out of their homes and reduced to abject poverty. Union soldiers later found many living in hovels and caves; barely alive. 

            After the war started, the Confederate Army rejected every principle of civilized warfare. They massacred Negro soldiers in cold blood and hanged their officers. They built death-camps for the express purpose of killing and maiming Union troops. The same fiends who devised those camps also ran a secret police force to maintain order. 

            Regardless of what revisionists say, we should be thankful that we had a President Lincoln and 2 million soldiers who fought for the Union. Over 360,000 of these men never came back. 1,522 soldiers won the Congressional Medal of Honor: the most in any American war. And not only were there heroic men; but women like Red Cross founder Clara Barton organized medical and humanitarian relief which continued long after the war. In many ways, the Lincoln Administration contrasted some of our darkest hours against some of our most heroic and self-sacrificing moments as a people.

            

FALSE FLAG SEASON IN SYRIA

      President Trump announced earlier this week a plan to withdraw US forces from Syria. Earlier he grounded our Air Force and suspended funding for terrorist forces masquerading as 'freedom fighters.' Clearly, the President's position has evolved considerably from last April when---with Rainbow Rex Tillerson perched like a crow on his shoulder---he launched cruise missiles against the legitimate Syrian Government.

      Now, for the third or fourth time since the Syrian Civil War began, we have a highly conveniently timed 'incident'. The Syrian Army allegedly deployed chemical weapons just as the US was about to end completely its illegal intervention in that country. This attack supposedly occurred in Douma: a terrorist-held redoubt in rural Damascus Province. The militants in Douma have refused to surrender despite being completely surrounded and besieged. Their situation is hopeless; but they are fanatics and have committed numerous war-crimes and atrocities against the civilian population. That includes using civilians as human shields.

      The Syrian Army and it's allies have been making slow but steady progress in the Battle of Douma. So why would they deploy chemical weapons? They are winning with conventional weapons and a chemical attack would injure the very civilians whom they hope to liberate. And the source of this story were the Soros-funded 'White Helmets' who too are nothing but Western proxies. 

      In other words, it's one of those false-flags; contrived either by Western interests or by the terrorists themselves with captured weapons. Little matter which: ISIS/Al-Qaeda and the DNC/RINO Deep-Statists have identical goals in Syria. 

       Tomorrow (Monday) the United Nations is convening a meeting over the alleged incident. Russian diplomats hope to stave off any over-reaction from Trump and French President Macron. Trump and Macron both denounced the attack, but wrongly blamed it on Syria. Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail as Russia presents evidence as to the truth.

          The Syrian Foreign Minister summed it well on Sunday. "These allegations of using chemical weapons have become an unconvincing script, except for some countries trafficking in the blood of civilians and which support terrorism in Syria...the pretense of using chemicals in the Eastern Ghouta Region was pre-planned and there is documented and confirmed evidence about this; and against which the Syrian State has previously warned."

         Trump has an opportunity here to bring the US back into "the community of nations" for real. He can renounce Deep-State policies once and for all after this evidence is presented.