Monday, September 4, 2017

MANOSPHERE CHUMPS AGAINST TRADITIONAL WOMEN

      The Alt-RINOs in the so-called 'Manosphere' are the antithesis of Conservatism. They are actually Leftist in the philosophy while Far-Right in their rhetoric. As another example of this, Roosh Valizedeh's  infamous Return of Kings blog published an article today warning men of the 'hazards' in relationships with traditional women.

      The article was written by one Chris George, a Game/PUA advocate. Now PUA is nothing but Socialist/Feminist 'free love' rebranded as male empowerment. George admits as much claiming in his bio as "questing for the perfect balance between family life and building a modern-day harem." Naturally, traditional marriage or complementary relationships are anathema to both Feminists and Red Pills. Both are gender-supremacist movements and both gender equality and polarity are despised concepts between them.

      George gives us three excuses men should use for avoiding traditional women. The first of these is that traditional women are too dependent. This is a rather strange position for a cult that is strongly opposed to even mild female independence. George explains that "If you can barely afford to have a good life on your own, when you start 'providing' you will find yourself in the predicament of a reduced standard of living."

        Obviously, a man who worries about something like this is one women should avoid, no matter what his economic abilities are. He's not going to put the interests of family first. This is probably to be expected from an author who wants both a family and a harem; but selfishness at this level in a male bodes ill of his prospects as a good husband and father.

         The second of George's points is that traditional women are too manipulative. The locus of George's complaint here is that traditional women are focused on building long-term relationships, a practice in which George sees as a way of entrapping men. He warns that if a man isn't on his guard, "before long she will have carefully navigated you towards a path that best suits her interests, but might not necessarily be in your interests."

          Here the repackaged Feminism is very apparent. This is the attitude of a male who sees relationships only in terms of zero-sum competition and not win-win cooperation. Again, this the type of man whom women should avoid. There can be no trust in a relationship based on such premises.

          George concludes with what he evidently considers the most critical problem: "traditional women don't age well." Although we all could likely think of contrary examples from Melania Trump onwards; there is a really phobia among denizens of the Manosphere against marrying women who might eventually grow older. Besides evincing extreme immaturity and unresolved Oedipus Complexes, the selfishness, narcissism, and dislike for women is evident.

         In fact, selfishness is the underlying theme in the entire article. There's not a single consideration to the woman's hopes, interests, feelings, or desires expressed anywhere. And not only in this article, it's a recurrent theme at Return of Kings in general.

         Don't be fooled by such hokum. There's nothing traditional about being a modern Casanova or building a modern-day harem as George claims to be doing. History is full of Casanovas and they rarely come to good ends. There's a good reason why one seldom meets a man of this type in his old age---and it's not because of younger women's tastes. The fact is that 'players' seldom reach advanced years in one piece. In contrast, the jails, skid-rows, mental hospitals, and cemeteries hold plenty of such characters.

       

          

4 comments:

  1. Well said.

    Not sure if you read Roosh's post the other day, but he wrote about how we have a way of becoming the very enemy we fight. He claims he fights feminists and Marxists. He didn't make the connection as it applies to himself, but like duh, so he's now an aging pickup artist acting just like a Marxist feminist, only in masculine form. Roosh is always just two brains cells away from an epiphany.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I did see that article. Sometimes the hypocrisy and projection these guys engage is so transparent that it defies commentary.

      Delete
  2. Very insightful posting. Thank you so very much for it. In the end, I don't think any real woman should even worry about or so much as give credit to these guys. They obsess over women the way a narcissist obsesses over the target he needs to be able to feel complete inside to erase their own feelings of inadequacy and past failures.This is not what the traditional manhood or patriarchy of the past was about. Traditional manhood and patriarchy is about honor and duty (for men, women and children) and a man's duty to love, honor, protect, provide for and cherish his wife. These men know nothing about love, honor or probably even happiness and completeness in life. They will either end up alone (after they've emotional traumatized the women they do attract so bad that they abandon them) or end up with women whose morals are as low as their own. I use to kind of fear and get upset over these guys and what they are out there doing, but not any more because if anything I realize the power I hold as a woman in just being a woman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you; that's a very good comment. These guys fear female power for the reasons you mentioned. They also fear other men; hence both their racism and their categorizing 'inferior men' as betas, gammas, omegas, etc.

      Delete