The Wahhabi Cult---an apostate sect of Islam---represents one of the greatest threats to world peace and to free peoples everywhere. Wahhabis are represented in groups like the Moslem Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, Boko Harum, and Al-Shebaab; and are behind the vast majority of the world's terrorist attacks; as well as being significant players in international criminal activities including narcotics, illegal weapons, and slave trafficking.
The Wahhabis are never called to account for their crimes because the countries that sponsor them enjoy the protection of Western powers, the US in particular. Saudi Arabia and its immediate neighbors: Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan, the UAE, and Oman are responsible for financing, training, arming this band of dangerous fanatics; and also for funding Wahhabi madrasas worldwide.
This week, the leading Islamic Imam of Saudi Arabia broadcast a sermon from the Great Mosque of Mecca offering the following prayer:
"O Allah, grant victory, respect, and power to our brothers in the Jihad, in Yemen, in Syria, in Iraq and everywhere. O Lord of the World, grant them victory over the godless Shiites. Grant them victory over the treacherous Jews and over the malevolent Christians, and over the untrustworthy hypocrites. O Allah, grant them help, victory, and strength."
This is the spiritual leader of the government to whom Obama and Bush Junior bowed; from whom Bill and Hilary Clinton took bribes; and whom Bush Senior defended with American lives in a 1991 war. This government has bought $76 billion dollars is US-made military hardware since 2001 and hosts a US military base. The Saudis likewise own billions in US assets and stocks---including many stocks in media outlets.
One has to wonder seriously why do the Saudis and their confederates exert so much leverage over Washington and Wall Street? That they are all major oil producers is true; but most likely that is only part of the answer. Oil is a legally traded commodity. Narcotics, weapons, and slaves are not. If a major power was engaged in these criminal activities secretly, Saudi Arabia and its satellites would be the ideal places to transit them and launder profits. Authoritarian regimes with lots of money and no transparency can hide a lot of secrets.
Now which major power is most heavily invested in these Wahhabi-run sheikdoms? By logical extension, this same major power must also have a large domestic black market of its own for these kinds of contraband. Which country, for example, is the world's leader consumer of methamphetamines and opioid drugs? The US. And which country runs covert weapons deals to people like the Mexican drug cartels? Same answer.
Which brings us to the uncomfortable matter of human trafficking. The US has been among the most internationally vocal about suppressing such things---but the thousands of Yahzidi, Syrian, Nigerian, and Somalian women and children who've been kidnapped by the Wahhabis are nonetheless never found. And given the destination of other contraband originating from the Middle East, we think that some reasonable conclusions may be drawn as to the whereabouts of these missing women and children.
But unfortunately the Ameroboob isn't inclined to connect these kinds of dots these days; after all, the NFL season is starting and we have to fight over whether some player protests the National Anthem; or welcome the first female coach; or applaud the first openly-gay player---or something. Besides, considering that one presidential candidate has real estate investments in the Arabian Peninsula and the other's been taking payoffs from the Wahhabis for decades, it's doubtful that our policy will change.
Once again this week, the American public---always with their pulse on the key global issues and ever-vigilant of their hard-won liberties---are seething with outrage. Is it because Obama made a fool of himself at the G-20 Summit? No. Maybe the revelations that George Soros was caught red-handed manipulating the Papal Visit for political gain? No. Then maybe it's because of Clinton Foundation influence-peddling, the DNC rigging of her nomination, and Corporate Media complicity in the cover-up? No, not that either.
No, the Ameroboobs are outraged, according to MSN News, because a model employed by Playboy took a picture of an older woman in a locker room and made a joke about it. MSN cites that stellar journalistic source People Magazine, as saying that 29 year-old Dani Matthews may face charges because her alleged 'victim' has complained to the LAPD. No word yet on whether Hilary Clinton will be charged for failing to disclose $225 million in taxpayer funds to the Clinton Foundation, though.
People Magazine is a subsidiary of Time, Inc., a spin-off from Time-Warner which donated over $200,000 to the Democratic National Committee in 2016.
Here in the Prozac Nation, where the personal is political, it is unofficially illegal to have a sense of humor unless it is acceptable under Politically Correct codes. Miss Dani has no right, in Postmodern America to make an off-the-cuff joke about somebody else; and of course the other person has to be a traumatized victim instead of laughing it off. People can go to jail for laughing at the wrong things in the United States these days. Miss Dani has been forced to make a formal apology for such inappropriate laughing.
It is interesting to reflect, when we look at pop-culture of earlier epochs, how Americans once had a reputation for our sense of humor. We used to be able to laugh at ourselves. Today we have an international reputation for being uptight, grim, and easily offended people. A reputation, incidentally, that is very well-deserved.
This is not to say, of course, that Americans never laugh---although they actually need cues to do it. A 'comedian' can reel off a string of blasphemies against the Church and be critically acclaimed for their irreverent humor. And the Alt-Right laughs too: just peruse the comments section on a typical Manosphere blog and there's plenty of rib-splitting material about women, Jews, and Blacks these days.
How did Americans lose their sense of humor? It is simply this: in a culture where every action is interpreted as a political statement, humor naturally centers on its offensiveness. Thus, we laugh at political enemies who are deemed to be offensive themselves; while becoming offended if someone from our own socio-political camp is offended. Sort of the situation in the Third Reich, where it was acceptable to laugh at Jews and Communists, but anyone who laughed at Hitler's moustache might get an interview with the Gestapo over it.
To cope with this gloomy atmosphere, many Americans turn to narcotics like hashish and Amphetamines and that seems to compensate for their lack of humor when binge-eating doesn't work.
But since we have a sense of humor here, we'll conclude this article with a picture of Dani Matthews, and thank her for being a normal girl who still knows how to laugh.
After a series of diplomatic snubs, White House gaffes, and seething with envy over Xi Jinping's popularity at the G-20 Summit, President Obama treated the world's leaders with a stellar performance of Ameroboob outrage. When finally given an opportunity to speak, Obama lashed out at his enemies.
"Part of what I've tried to communicate to President Xi" Obama thundered, "is that the United States arrives at its power, in part, by restraining itself."
A statement which must have raised more than a few eyebrows. The President continued: "When we see them violating international rules and norms, as we have seen in some cases in the South China Sea or in some of their behavior when it comes to economic policy, we have been very firm. And we have indicated to them that there will be consequences!"
Obama then turned his wrath on his other nemesis, Russian President Putin.
"We have had problems with cyber intrusions from Russia in the past," Obama fumed. "We cannot have a situation where countries that have significant cyber capacity start engaging in unhealthy competition or conflict through those means" (says the man who presided over the NSA spy scandal) "We're moving into a new era where a number of countries have significant cyber capacity. And frankly, we have more capability than anybody, both offensively and defensively!"
Obama also unleashed his frustrations on his rebellious satrap in The Philippines, President Rodrigo Duterte. Obama gave covert aid to Duterte to elevate him to the Filipino Presidency, but the two have had a significant falling-out almost since Duterte's first day in office. The thuggish Filipino President took Obama's rather personally, and launched into a public tirade of his own---the text of which discretion compels us to draw a veil over. Obama was forced to cancel a scheduled meeting with Duterte over the incident.
Mercifully for American prestige abroad, the G-20 Summit concluded---closing one of the disgraceful US foreign policy episodes since Bush Senior puked on the Japanese Prime Minister in 1990.
Beltway antics aside, the 2016 G-20 Summit actually did see significant and progressive initiatives come to fruition. Post-BREXIT Britain and China seem to have resolved their differences over a pending nuclear deal which will potentially revolutionize the UK's energy sector. The nations also ratified China's proposal for a joint task force to fight global financial corruption, as well as a proposal for greater joint efforts to fight international terrorism. They also set up an international task force to promote innovation in technological fields. To Obama's further mortification, the participants agreed to include the Gold-backed Chinese yuan as an IMF reserve currency.
But next year, we Americans can look forward to President Trump lecturing the G-20 on Border Walls as an economic stimulus project. Oh well...
The Manosphere Game Cult leader, The Voice of God, has penned another article attacking American opinion-writer Jonah Goldberg's critique of the Alt-Right at one of his blogs, Vox Populi. Goldberg's article, which appeared in The National Review but has apparently since been pulled, made some of the same arguments against the Alt-Right that we have made here. As quoted by Vox, Goldberg says the following:
"By their own words, the Alt-Right wants to destroy and replace Classical Liberalism and Modern Conservatism and replace it with some tribal 'identitarian' understanding of whiteness as a unifying concept. In this it shares the same modes of thought as the radical racialist Left. Hence its real goal is not just to turn the Alt-Right into the Right, pure and simple, but to transform the consciousness of all white Americans---and white people everywhere---into racial jingoists."
The 100+ commenters at Vox Populi were quick to dismiss Goldberg as a Jew and a cuckservative, the latest Game Cult neologism to disparage anyone who holds traditional American values like family, faith, freedom, and the Constitution over Alt-Right Political Correctness. Vox says in his rebuttal to Goldberg that
"Skin color exists. DNA exists. Race exists. Nations exist. But the various concepts upon which Jonah's Conservatism relies: equality, the Melting Pot, Judeo-Christian values, and a nation of immigrants, do not."
Many critics of the Manosphere Game Cult have noted the intellectual immaturity of its spokesmen, and the above statement is a good example. The leaders of Game---all of them that we have seen, without exception---seem incapable of Abstract Thought. Child psychologists, among them Piaget, Montessori, Koffka, and others all agree that the capacity for abstract reasoning develops with biological puberty; and the childlike reductionist thinking and the obsessions with sexuality these writers have does cast some legitimate doubt as to their levels of emotional adulthood.
Be that as it may, the concrete reality of things like race, gender, and nation are among the foundational aspects of Civilization, but to build a sociopolitical theory upon them is reductionist in the extreme: as Goldberg pointed out, such a philosophy is a reversion to Tribalism. DNA evidence proves, if anything, that Mankind itself is one large melting pot of races, as all humanity can now be reliably traced to single human male ancestor. The well-known phrase opposites attract in human sexuality was supported by no less an Evolutionist than Charles Darwin himself; who theorized that the natural male instinct to possess and mate with a unique female accounts for all the localized human racial disparities on the planet.
That America is not a nation of immigrants is, of course, an absurdity, as well as the notion that Christianity had no relationship to Jewish thought.
Our Declaration of Independence states "We hold these truths as self-evident: that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness---and to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
If the Alt-Right and the Game Cult have an issue with our cuckservative Founding Fathers, the onus is upon themselves to explain exactly how such a statement contradicts Goldberg's claim that their goal is transform the consciousness of white Americans is a false statement.
Vox Populi does make an attempt to gloss over this obvious contradiction and claims that:"We are not transformatives, we are, rather, observational realists." A blatant falsehood, because the Game Cult refers to its conversion process as 'taking the Red Pill' which means freeing oneself (i.e. transforming) into a state of higher awareness achieved by adhering to their teachings. He goes to underscore the transformative nature of the Alt-Right by adding:
"Since Jonah sees no reason to give an inch to science, history, and reality, it should not be surprising that both his movement and his personal brand are in descent, if not free-fall." On the contrary: we would argue that both Classical Liberalism and Traditional Conservatism are in descent precisely because Americans have given an inch to science, history, and reality. The Alt-Right represents almost nothing based in American traditions, but instead reflects the worst elements of our historical past---not its best ones.
This is another aspect that the Alt-Right shares with the Far Left, and what makes the Alt-Right and the Game Cult so particularly dangerous. They've essentially taken the most negative propaganda stereotypes from the Feminists, Atheists, and Marxist Historical Revisionists and flipped these stereotypes into Masculine, Christian, and American virtues. Granted, America has had dark periods and toxic social movements: Economic Corporatism, the Know-Nothing Movement, organized racism, sexual anarchism, Communist infiltrations---these things existed and still do exist---but generations of men and women since our Republic was founded have worked to stamp them out and build the society our Founders envisioned.
Goldberg predicts that the Alt-Right will eventually go down in flames; in the long-term he is assuredly correct. Short-term, his prediction remains to be seen. The fundamental point that Goldberg seems to miss---at least in the segment Vox Populi quotes--- is that the Alt-Right feeds off the existence of the Cultural Marxist Left. The two movements cannot be ideologically separated and will always co-exist. Nonetheless, he is correct: the Reactionary Right is no antidote to the extremist of the Left. For all his talk of ignoring history, Vox Populi should note where Fascism, Nazism, and Stalinism---the Alt-Right of the last century ultimately led.
The scandals surrounding the Clinton Foundation and the influence-peddling that went along with is largely being covered up by the US Corporate Media. The once-great Democratic Party has proven itself, under the Clinton Era from the 1990s onward to have a veritable viper's-nest of corruption. The Clinton Administration---and the Obama Administration which is an extension of it---are fraught with a series of illegal activities, including more than a few unsolved murders.
The Corporate Media, since 1992, has been an integral part of the Clinton Machine. Recall that in 1996 President Clinton signed into law the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which gave rise to the media monopolies we have today. In 2000, Clinton also repealed the segment of the Communications Act of 1934, which obligated mass-media outlets to provide rebuttal time for a person or party who was personally attacked.
Here is a list of media figures and entities which donated over $250, 000 to the Clinton Foundation:
1. Carlos Slim, CEO of Telmex and largest stockholder in the New York Times
2. James Murdoch, of 21st Century Fox
3. Newsmax Media Group
4. Thomson-Reuters
5. Google
6. The News Corporation Foundation
7. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing
8. Richard Mellon Scaife (died 2014).
In the 2016 race, Hillary Clinton is by far the largest recipient of donations from Big Media. Her list of top individual donors include Comcast, Time-Warner, News Corp, CBS Television and the Disney Corporation; all of which donated more money to Clinton than to any other candidate.
It's also quite noteworthy that Clinton's supposed 'right-wing opponents' figure quite prominently on both lists. But follow the money. News Corp, for example, is heavily invested in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, who are a source of oil industry and defense contracting dollars---and who likewise enjoy a cozy relationship with the Clintons. Companies like News Corp reap big advertising dollars selling anti-Clinton news stories at the same time they reap benefits from Clinton policies. Does anybody from the Alt-Right side still want to argue that Cultural and Moral issues don't belong in politics or economics?
This type of Government-Media collusion demonstrates exactly why a Financial Oligarchy is no better than an Authoritarian Government. Godless Capitalism and Godless Communism have the same corrosive and corrupting effects on a society. It's no argument to appeal to the so-called 'Free Market' here. Our Declaration of Independence acknowledges the moral truth that Human Rights are derived from God; and a godless society is bound to be unfree, regardless of its economic system.
It is also no argument to plead the First Amendment and pretend that these crimes are protected speech or that people have a right to choose alternatives. When a company like Newsmax is preaching to a Conservative audience at the same time it is throwing over one million dollars into the Clinton Foundation's coffers, then it is clear that an intent to deceive is in full operation here: that there is no real alternative mass-media outlet. The idea that there is a balanced Liberal and Conservative mass-media in the US is an illusion: exactly like the illusion that the Far Left and the Alt-Right are two different ideologies.
But the behind-the-scenes posturing serves another purpose. By setting up a series of controlled opposition, the Political and Corporate Elites can keep the unthinking and uncritical American public polarized and divided. While Americans are fighting at political rallies and politicians are slinging mud at the media circuses; the Smart Boys on Wall Street go on rioting in the spoils and laughing up their sleeves.
President Obama arrived in China for his final appearance at a G-20 economic summit, and things have gotten off to rather shaky start. A few days before Obama's arrival, Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau defied the White House by reaching an agreement with China to apply for membership in the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Then Russian President Putin arrived to cheering crowds of welcoming Chinese citizens.
Obama, however, received a more frosty reception. In fact, he really got no reception. Air Force One landed on a runaway without the usual fanfare. The red-carpet staircase and high-level Chinese diplomatic officials were absent. Obama was compelled, like an ordinary citizen, to exit the plane on ordinary metal stairs.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that "China provides a rolling staircase for every visiting foreign leader, but the US side complained that the driver doesn't speak English and can't understand US security instructions."
The Chinese officials also prohibited journalists traveling with the President from approaching him for security reasons. This led to a heated verbal exchange between White House Staff Chief Susan Rice and the Chinese Airport Security Official who flatly told her,
"This is our country, this is our airport."
Scuffles have reportedly broken out between Obama's entourage and Chinese security details.
The US Corporate Media outlet, The Wall Street Journal fumed that "The Chinese barred Mr. Obama from including his travelling press contingent in the motorcade. The hosts have also refused a White House request for a joint press conference with Mr. Xi, and they also plan to block Mr. Obama's solo press briefing from appearing live on Chinese television."
The Chinese media---which is largely state-run---has, of this writing, even yet to report on Obama's arrival in China. Although there are several articles and photographs of President Xi greeting other leaders. Xinhua News did provide a summary, of sorts on the meeting between Xi and Obama, which reads more like a standard press release. In fact, there has really been more coverage of Putin gifting Xi with the Chinese president's favorite brand of Russian ice cream than much of anything Obama has said or done.
We suppose that it is understandable---after tolerating 8 years of our Administration's arrogance---that China would let the American elites know what they really think of them.
In more relevant news, post-BREXIT British Prime Minister Teresa May made an important commitment to strengthening Sino-British economic ties, heralding the beginning of a 'Golden Age' of free trade.
"This is the beginning of a Golden Age of UK-China relations" May said at a press conference, "The message I will bring to the G-20 is that Britain is now open for business, as a bold, confident, outward-looking country, we will be playing a key role on the world stage."
Ironically, Obama---who threatened that Britain would "go to the back of the trade queue" if it ratified BREXIT---arrived in China via the back-exit of an airplane, while Britain forged new trade ties.
Obama's staff scuffles with Chinese officials...
As does the US media.
DC Leaks released a new batch of documents relevant to the ever-deepening Soros Scandal. The Corporate Media has obligingly swept most of Soros' crimes under the rug---not surprising since we've seen from previous revelations Soros' cozy relationships with the Media Cartels.
What we learned today is that this foreign national and Wall Street freebooter, Soros, has not only orchestrated media campaigns in Europe, he's been meddling in the 2016 US Elections as well. Soros' Open Society Foundation plopped down a whopping $650,000 in 2015 to formulate a scheme to exploit Pope Francis' visit for ends politically profitable to Soros.
"The initiative's grantees sought to use this opportunity {of the Papal visit} to mobilize their tens of thousands of members in local chapters in 11 states to build towards a set of concrete policy reforms to be advanced in 2016."
The grantees referred to herein were the PICO National Network and the Faith in Public Life Foundation. Both are nominally Christian organizations: the latter is a Soros-funded front group, while Soros' Open Society Foundation is a major contributor to PICO. PICO was founded in 1972 by a radical priest who'd studied under Saul Alinsky.
The goals of these two groups, as outlined in 2015 OSF Board Meeting was that they should "jump at the opportunity to shift US national paradigms and priorities in the run-up to the 2016 presidential campaign." Or, in plain English, to dupe unwitting Catholics into supporting Soros' Cultural Marxism under the guise of Christian moral duties. How they were to achieve this was fairly clear:
"Improve co-ordination with local chapters to push for a range of state and local policy changes related to economic and racial justice. Engage individual bishops to voice more publically support of economic and racial justice issues; to create a critical mass of bishops...we can emphasize the Pope's searing condemnation of what he calls 'an economy of exclusion and inequality' and his dismissal of trickle-down economics."
The document further shows that Soros---using the same tricks he'd employed in the Maidan Coup---sought to develop a sophisticated PR campaign through major Corporate Media outlets: CNN, NPR, NBC, and various other news outlets.
"The impact of our work and the relationships it has fostered can be seen in the broad range of religious leaders hitting back at presidential candidates for their use of fearmongering." the Foundation's leaders trumpeted in the Spring of 2016.
The OSF even got intelligence from inside the Papal Curia via a sympathizer with their goals, Cardinal Oscar Madariaga, of Honduras. The Cardinal---who is an outspoken anti-Semite and admirer of Fidel Castro's economic policies---was contacted to attempt to arrange Papal visits with low-income American Catholics. What a vile act: to turn a symbol of Christian humility into a cheap propaganda photo-op for the American Left. But such is character of George Soros; a man who would not hesitate to use even the Pope for personal gain.
So how do all the Smart Boys who think there's nothing wrong with Soros' foreign intrigues feel about him doing it in their own backyards? When we had sane government, we used to treat people like Soros as undesirable aliens and prohibit their activities in domestic politics. But that was then, this is now. In our enlightened Postmodern Era, the news that concerns us are sex scandals and the newest antidepressant dope---and Soros and his cohorts go on laughing all the way to the bank.
