Since the demise of The Daily Stormer, the Red Pill Cult has been looking for a new venue to discredit everything Conservatives and Christians. So a bunch of cast-offs from the old site, namely Weev, Voltar, and Zeiger have started a new podcast called Race Ghost. Aside from the silly title, the inaugural episode began with a beautiful paean expressing the Red Pill disciples' respect for women:
"I think at this point every woman in the Western world needs to be raped. I definately think that we need White men to do it, but I do think that these skanks need proper beatings and rapes. Without the coercion of rape, women will always fall."
Weev, whose real name is Andrew Auernheimer, went on to indulge in some Feminist Herstory Revisionism, explaining how the 'patriarchy' oppressed women up until recent times. Both Red Pills and Feminists believe this nonsense; the only difference is that the Red Pills believe that Feminist mythology is some desirable state of society.
Auernheimer, like many of the Game/PUA crowd, has a shady history. He was once sentenced to 41 months in the Federal penitentiary for hacking an AT&T database and releasing sensitive information on over 100,000 Americans. And like many others of this crowd, has a long track-record of bullying and abusing women.
Weev often brags about his success with women, but this manly Alpha leader has launched vicious cyber-campaigns various women. One Kathy Sierra, a tech professional, was forced offline and forced into hiding because of Auernheimer's troll attacks and cyber-bullying. The attacks included things like publishing her address, Social Security Number, and instigating death threats. There were false accusations that she was a prostitute and the damage expanded as unwitting sex customers contacted her. It's strongly suspected that Auernheimer instigated last Christmas' vicious troll attack on Tanya Gersh.
Like his mentors Vox Day and Andrew Anglin, Auernheimer praises psychopathic thugs like Anders Breivik and Dylann Roof, but hates all Jews. He once said:
"I think we should take all these vile Jews who produce pornography and the Jew bankers who fund them and line them up in the street and crucify them just like they crucified Christ."
He's also stated that Breivik had "a mandate from God" to commit the greatest mass-murder in Norway since the Nazi Occupation.
Auernheimer is another scumbag who falsely claims to speak for the political Right. The danger with such people---beside their obvious tendencies to commit violent crimes---is that the equally unbalanced provocateurs on the Left smear all Conservatives and Christians by equating extremists of this sort with the Right. That's why we need to hold those on the Right to a higher standard, and be the first to condemn and call out the phonies.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
THE NFL HITS AN ECONOMIC DEATH SPIRAL
A pair of new reports spell real problems for the NFL and its inept leadership. Week 13 was an attendance disaster, and preliminary forecasts are showing that NFL ratings this year will be the lowest in over a decade, according to investment group RBC Capital Markets. RBC analyst Stephen Cahill said to Business Insider that investors are now wary of buying stock in media and NFL-related advertisers.
Most pundits believe that the decline is directly related to the 'Anthem Protests' and Cahill acknowledges this is a factor. But he also points out that NFL viewership has been in a sustained decline since 2013. He mentions oversaturation as another cause, which is also a good point, but not the whole story either.
The ratings numbers that came in from the annual Thanksgiving Day games are a case in point. All three games saw a double-digit drop in ratings from 2016. It used to be that there were only two games on Thanksgiving, but the greedy NFL mandarins expanded it to three. This is a prime example of oversaturation. Thanksgiving is a day when people gather with family: one or two games before dinner might be doable, but who's going to watch football all day on a holiday?
The problems that Cahill mentioned are symptomatic. The Anthem Protests are really more of a last straw than the actual cause for disgruntled fans. Oversaturated markets are a sign of one of the reasons for this disillusionment. As we mentioned above, it shows that the NFL places a lot more value on profit than all of its lip-service to fans and community would suggest. In fact, the NFL has very little concern for either. Let's examine team moves, for example. From the league's modernization in 1932 to the NFL-AFL Merger in 1970, we saw four teams change cities. Since the mid 1980s, it's been anybody's guess where a team might end up next year. How can anybody be loyal to team that runs off at the first lure of a fat financial deal?
It's the same with the players too. There used to be what were called 'franchise players'---most of whom are quite famous. These were players who stayed with one team throughout most or all of their careers. Now players are up for the highest bidder. These types of men can hardly be the role models that players formerly were:
Not to mention that no father in his right mind holds up thugs or 'openly gay' players to his sons as someone to emulate. And herein is the root reason for the NFL's sustained decline: it has ceased to have any appeal to men.
Like much of the rest of our Trash Culture, professional football has become an emasculated institution. Team sports are---and always have been---a means of male bonding either as active participants or passive spectators. This is a fact rooted in masculine psychology and spans all cultures and epochs. Long before the White Man arrived in North America, the Indians were playing lacrosse, a game with strong parallels to American football. And we all know the value other nations put on soccer, ice hockey, and a few American imports like baseball and basketball. Take away the masculine interest in team sports by glorifying values that most men find repulsive and put profit and political correctness over team spirit and you have a recipe for the kind of disaster that the NFL is heading for.
If the NFL ownership doesn't change course---radically and immediately---2018 is going to be much worse for them than this year. They're on a economic trajectory to collapse well before their centennial in the next decade. And nobody will even miss them.
Most pundits believe that the decline is directly related to the 'Anthem Protests' and Cahill acknowledges this is a factor. But he also points out that NFL viewership has been in a sustained decline since 2013. He mentions oversaturation as another cause, which is also a good point, but not the whole story either.
The ratings numbers that came in from the annual Thanksgiving Day games are a case in point. All three games saw a double-digit drop in ratings from 2016. It used to be that there were only two games on Thanksgiving, but the greedy NFL mandarins expanded it to three. This is a prime example of oversaturation. Thanksgiving is a day when people gather with family: one or two games before dinner might be doable, but who's going to watch football all day on a holiday?
The problems that Cahill mentioned are symptomatic. The Anthem Protests are really more of a last straw than the actual cause for disgruntled fans. Oversaturated markets are a sign of one of the reasons for this disillusionment. As we mentioned above, it shows that the NFL places a lot more value on profit than all of its lip-service to fans and community would suggest. In fact, the NFL has very little concern for either. Let's examine team moves, for example. From the league's modernization in 1932 to the NFL-AFL Merger in 1970, we saw four teams change cities. Since the mid 1980s, it's been anybody's guess where a team might end up next year. How can anybody be loyal to team that runs off at the first lure of a fat financial deal?
It's the same with the players too. There used to be what were called 'franchise players'---most of whom are quite famous. These were players who stayed with one team throughout most or all of their careers. Now players are up for the highest bidder. These types of men can hardly be the role models that players formerly were:
Not to mention that no father in his right mind holds up thugs or 'openly gay' players to his sons as someone to emulate. And herein is the root reason for the NFL's sustained decline: it has ceased to have any appeal to men.
Like much of the rest of our Trash Culture, professional football has become an emasculated institution. Team sports are---and always have been---a means of male bonding either as active participants or passive spectators. This is a fact rooted in masculine psychology and spans all cultures and epochs. Long before the White Man arrived in North America, the Indians were playing lacrosse, a game with strong parallels to American football. And we all know the value other nations put on soccer, ice hockey, and a few American imports like baseball and basketball. Take away the masculine interest in team sports by glorifying values that most men find repulsive and put profit and political correctness over team spirit and you have a recipe for the kind of disaster that the NFL is heading for.
If the NFL ownership doesn't change course---radically and immediately---2018 is going to be much worse for them than this year. They're on a economic trajectory to collapse well before their centennial in the next decade. And nobody will even miss them.
Sunday, December 3, 2017
THE SEX SCANDALS THEY WON'T TALK ABOUT
December 1st was designated World AIDS Awareness Day. After a hiatus of several years, the Corporate Media is paying attention to AIDS again; now that we have a Republican-controlled government. During the Obama years---when the self-appointed cultural elites were pushing homo acceptance and 'same-sex marriage'---the subject of AIDS rarely appeared in the press. It disappeared from the Mainstream Media as dramatically as stories about economic growth have vanished since Trump was sworn in.
But some stories haven't returned. For example, few Americans outside of Maryland know who Carlos Bell is. Bell was thrown in jail last week on 206 federal charges including rape, sex trafficking, child pornography and narcotics charges. All of Bell's victims were boys and young men, who were all legal minors.
Carlos Bell was also HIV-Positive. He may have knowingly infected at least 42 juveniles with AIDS.
Bell worked for the Maryland Public Schools, all in Charles County. Maryland Public Schools have been aggressively promoting the homosexual agenda. In fact, in October, private schools who refused to bow to Maryland's political correctness were stripped of state funding. The Corporate Media has had very little to say about homosexual rape cases like this; despite having much to say about aggressive flirting by heterosexual men.
A 2016 CDC Report---which was discreetly kept out of public sight by interested parties---showed that homosexual rape is quite common in America's public schools. According to the CDC's findings, 20% of 'LGBTQ' students reported having been sexually assaulted. The reported number among sexually-adjusted students was 5%. Politicians like Seattle's former mayor Ed Murray and Portland's former mayor Sam Adams were both ejected from office after allegations of raping young men and boys became well-known.
Yet the Media doesn't want a discussion about the obvious problems with 'normalizing' homosexuality. Their propaganda would have us believe that homosexual rape has disappeared along with AIDS---in fact that it's a better and purer lifestyle choice than normal sexual unions. The high suicide and drug addiction rates among 'LGBTQ' persons might suggest otherwise. Yet the Media silence on this issue is understandable just by noting which cities have the highest homosexual populations:
1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. Chicago
4. San Francisco
5. Phoenix
6. Houston
7. San Diego
8. Dallas
9. Seattle
10. Boston
And which cities have the highest per capita number of them:
1. Seattle
2. San Francisco
3. Atlanta
4. Minneapolis
5. Boston
6. Sacramento
7. Portland
8. Denver
9. Washington
10. Orlando
Note that the first group are mostly cities with a large media presence and that the second has a high number of people who work for the government. That explains how much of the Government-Media collusion comes about on this particular issue.
Thus, we're not hearing much about real sex scandals. First 'openly gay' mayors caught raping minors; school officials hired under 'inclusive' policies assaulting people; the number of HIV-positive homosexuals who knowingly infect others. And the fault isn't solely with Liberal Democrats. RINOs like 'Rainbow Rex' Tillerson and Robert Gates gave homosexual scoutmasters free access to young boys and men despite the long history of attempted homosexual infiltration there. What is happening in the military, no one knows.
Maybe Americans should worry a little more about who's with their kids than which Senator was with which woman, don't you think?
But some stories haven't returned. For example, few Americans outside of Maryland know who Carlos Bell is. Bell was thrown in jail last week on 206 federal charges including rape, sex trafficking, child pornography and narcotics charges. All of Bell's victims were boys and young men, who were all legal minors.
Carlos Bell was also HIV-Positive. He may have knowingly infected at least 42 juveniles with AIDS.
Bell worked for the Maryland Public Schools, all in Charles County. Maryland Public Schools have been aggressively promoting the homosexual agenda. In fact, in October, private schools who refused to bow to Maryland's political correctness were stripped of state funding. The Corporate Media has had very little to say about homosexual rape cases like this; despite having much to say about aggressive flirting by heterosexual men.
A 2016 CDC Report---which was discreetly kept out of public sight by interested parties---showed that homosexual rape is quite common in America's public schools. According to the CDC's findings, 20% of 'LGBTQ' students reported having been sexually assaulted. The reported number among sexually-adjusted students was 5%. Politicians like Seattle's former mayor Ed Murray and Portland's former mayor Sam Adams were both ejected from office after allegations of raping young men and boys became well-known.
Yet the Media doesn't want a discussion about the obvious problems with 'normalizing' homosexuality. Their propaganda would have us believe that homosexual rape has disappeared along with AIDS---in fact that it's a better and purer lifestyle choice than normal sexual unions. The high suicide and drug addiction rates among 'LGBTQ' persons might suggest otherwise. Yet the Media silence on this issue is understandable just by noting which cities have the highest homosexual populations:
1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. Chicago
4. San Francisco
5. Phoenix
6. Houston
7. San Diego
8. Dallas
9. Seattle
10. Boston
And which cities have the highest per capita number of them:
1. Seattle
2. San Francisco
3. Atlanta
4. Minneapolis
5. Boston
6. Sacramento
7. Portland
8. Denver
9. Washington
10. Orlando
Note that the first group are mostly cities with a large media presence and that the second has a high number of people who work for the government. That explains how much of the Government-Media collusion comes about on this particular issue.
Thus, we're not hearing much about real sex scandals. First 'openly gay' mayors caught raping minors; school officials hired under 'inclusive' policies assaulting people; the number of HIV-positive homosexuals who knowingly infect others. And the fault isn't solely with Liberal Democrats. RINOs like 'Rainbow Rex' Tillerson and Robert Gates gave homosexual scoutmasters free access to young boys and men despite the long history of attempted homosexual infiltration there. What is happening in the military, no one knows.
Maybe Americans should worry a little more about who's with their kids than which Senator was with which woman, don't you think?
Friday, December 1, 2017
NATIONAL CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTS UP
Back in the days before the Cultural Marxists took over public education, a group of Washington D.C. schoolchildren got the idea to display a Christmas scene at the White House. Then-President Coolidge deferred the decision to his wife, and she liked the idea. Thus began an annual tradition of having a national Christmas Tree. In Coolidge's day, electric lighting was a fairly new technology, but some local engineering students worked out the system. (As a side note, that too started the trend for electric Christmas lights).
During the Deep-State years, the tradition really lost a lot of its meaning. President Obama, for example, made a bigger deal of lighting the White House in rainbow-flag colors than he ever did about Christmas Trees. Most Liberals actually dislike Christmas and what it represents. It's not uncommon in many Left-Wing jurisdictions that the local governments discourage Christmas celebrations and displays. Let's simply say that they carry more of the spirit of the Pharisees and Sadducees than of the Three Wise Men and leave it at that.
President Trump however, unashamedly brought back the Christmas traditions to the White House; and Melania really outdid herself designing this display:
Trump addressed the assembled onlookers with this remarkable statement: "The Christmas Story begins 2,000 years ago with a mother, a father, their baby son, and the most extraordinary gift of all---the gift of God's Love for all humanity. Whatever our beliefs, we know that the Birth of Jesus Christ and the story of His Life forever changed the course of human history."
We say 'remarkable' because it seems like ages since we've actually heard a US President speak favorably of Christianity. Also, the way he mentioned St. Joseph and the Virgin Mary in the context of traditional families. To underscore that point, Trump concluded his message, saying: "Especially tonight, I want to thank America's families. At Christmastide more than ever, we are reminded that the family is the bedrock of American life."
The perverts in the Corporate Media naturally guffawed over these words. They made fools of themselves trying to distract public attention with World AIDS Awareness Day. For the last few years---while they were pushing homo acceptance and so-called 'marriage equality---we never heard a peep out of them about the AIDS epidemic. The AIDS virus apparently goes dormant whenever homosexuals demand political concessions.
Leaving their gloomy reflections aside, the Christmas Tree Celebration this year is a statement that the new Administration is on the side of normal, mainstream Americans again. For the first time in a long time, it's officially OK to be a Christian; to have a normal two-parent family; and to have public holidays in America honoring these things. It's important to have days like these because these are times to consider and be thankful for things like religion and family---fundamentals that we often take for granted. Before Christ's Advent the Law of Moses commanded "Remember the Sabbath Day and keep it holy". Moses understood human nature and understood that we needed a holy day to bring us to remembrance of the fundamentals on which our lives are based.
That is what made the 2017 Tree Lighting so special. This year, it was a ceremony with some substance and looking towards the future; not merely symbolic of some quaint traditions, as previous presidents have been treating it.
During the Deep-State years, the tradition really lost a lot of its meaning. President Obama, for example, made a bigger deal of lighting the White House in rainbow-flag colors than he ever did about Christmas Trees. Most Liberals actually dislike Christmas and what it represents. It's not uncommon in many Left-Wing jurisdictions that the local governments discourage Christmas celebrations and displays. Let's simply say that they carry more of the spirit of the Pharisees and Sadducees than of the Three Wise Men and leave it at that.
President Trump however, unashamedly brought back the Christmas traditions to the White House; and Melania really outdid herself designing this display:
Trump addressed the assembled onlookers with this remarkable statement: "The Christmas Story begins 2,000 years ago with a mother, a father, their baby son, and the most extraordinary gift of all---the gift of God's Love for all humanity. Whatever our beliefs, we know that the Birth of Jesus Christ and the story of His Life forever changed the course of human history."
We say 'remarkable' because it seems like ages since we've actually heard a US President speak favorably of Christianity. Also, the way he mentioned St. Joseph and the Virgin Mary in the context of traditional families. To underscore that point, Trump concluded his message, saying: "Especially tonight, I want to thank America's families. At Christmastide more than ever, we are reminded that the family is the bedrock of American life."
The perverts in the Corporate Media naturally guffawed over these words. They made fools of themselves trying to distract public attention with World AIDS Awareness Day. For the last few years---while they were pushing homo acceptance and so-called 'marriage equality---we never heard a peep out of them about the AIDS epidemic. The AIDS virus apparently goes dormant whenever homosexuals demand political concessions.
Leaving their gloomy reflections aside, the Christmas Tree Celebration this year is a statement that the new Administration is on the side of normal, mainstream Americans again. For the first time in a long time, it's officially OK to be a Christian; to have a normal two-parent family; and to have public holidays in America honoring these things. It's important to have days like these because these are times to consider and be thankful for things like religion and family---fundamentals that we often take for granted. Before Christ's Advent the Law of Moses commanded "Remember the Sabbath Day and keep it holy". Moses understood human nature and understood that we needed a holy day to bring us to remembrance of the fundamentals on which our lives are based.
That is what made the 2017 Tree Lighting so special. This year, it was a ceremony with some substance and looking towards the future; not merely symbolic of some quaint traditions, as previous presidents have been treating it.
Thursday, November 30, 2017
THE WAGES OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
Sometimes a picture says it all. If anybody doubts that the NFL hasn't completely self-destructed, note the attendance in this photo from the Cowboys-Redskins game from November, 2008:
And this one from tonight's game between the same two arch-rivals:
It used to be that the Cowboys-Redskins games were sold out months in advance. Ticket scalpers used to snare well over $100 per ticket at this time of year. We're guessing from the looks of this picture that NFL ticket-scalping isn't especially profitable anymore.
What caused the change? Fans are sick and tired of the NFL's disgusting political correctness:
Combined with their thuggery both on
And off of the field.
The NFL leadership chose Trash Culture and Political Correctness over sportsmanship and fair play---now they find themselves increasingly marginalized. The centennial anniversary of the NFL's founding is only a few years away: they may not survive until then at this rate.
And this one from tonight's game between the same two arch-rivals:
It used to be that the Cowboys-Redskins games were sold out months in advance. Ticket scalpers used to snare well over $100 per ticket at this time of year. We're guessing from the looks of this picture that NFL ticket-scalping isn't especially profitable anymore.
What caused the change? Fans are sick and tired of the NFL's disgusting political correctness:
Combined with their thuggery both on
And off of the field.
The NFL leadership chose Trash Culture and Political Correctness over sportsmanship and fair play---now they find themselves increasingly marginalized. The centennial anniversary of the NFL's founding is only a few years away: they may not survive until then at this rate.
Wednesday, November 29, 2017
ARE WE WITNESSING A DNC PURGE?
Although we haven't given the subject much attention here, everyone no doubt has heard about various 'sex scandals' exploding all over the Liberal political wing. Senators, Congressmen, pundits, and media figures have been going down (no pun intended) from coast to coast. NBC anti-Trump doofus Matt Lauer was fired just yesterday.
One of the reasons why we've given so little space to these 'scandals' is because most of these guys were part of a political culture that persecuted heterosexual men for acting like---heterosexuals. Some have been real cads, but that's hardly reason to lock them up. The only ones who really deserve any jail time are guys like Anthony Wiener, who compromised national security by sexting on a government phone storing sensitive information. Or guys like former Seattle Mayor Ed Murray, who committed actual homosexual rape.
However, in the upside-down world of the Whacko Left, a man who shows any sign of having functioning testosterone is a horror who must be suppressed. It's like being born White or believing in God: all perfectly natural things to normal people, but signs of inherent character defect to the Left. As Left-Wing crackpot radio host Tom Hartman always says: "Testosterone is the world's most dangerous drug."
So why are so many of the Liberal leaders suddenly under fire for these scandals? We're going to go out on a limb here and suggest that this may be an organized Party Purge.
This has happened before on the Left. The 2016 Democratic Primaries had a lot of similarities to the 1968 events. In 1968, the Far Left moved to hijack the DNC and sabotaged the incumbent, Lyndon Johnson. Johnson was the last of the 'New Deal' Democrats and probably had a legitimate chance going head-to-head with Richard Nixon. In 2016, the incumbent Obama was more-or-less obliged to endorse the Clintons, though his sympathies were clearly with Sanders.
After the Far Left failed to gain control of the DNC in 1968, they geared up for 1972 by sabotaging as many old-school Democrats as possible to get their own candidate, George McGovern, nominated. What we're suggesting is that the same thing might be going on again. Considering that the McGovern/Carter/Clinton Faction were radicals of 1972---and they're the ones being targeted today---we can imagine how extreme their intended replacements are going to be. Sanders himself was barely one step away from outright Bolshevism himself. We easily could have had 2017 America looking like 1917 Russia if things had gone in Sanders' favor.
The DNC Election in 2017 very nearly went for Keith Ellison, a deep-dyed radical, who lost to a Clinton-backed candidate by only 8%. The DNC Election is a very clear indication that the radicals are making power-plays.
Could it be then that the blitz of 'sex scandals' on the Liberal Left is a way to clear out the 'old guard' and bring in even more radical elements? It could be. It seems as though a lot of the men being accused are disproportionately men of the Clinton Faction and a corresponding number of so-called 'progressives' doing the accusing.
But if we're seeing a repeat of 1972 on the way to 2020, take heart. 1972 was a crushing Electoral win for the Republicans; and Trump can no doubt wipe out any candidate whom the Radical Left might offer.
One of the reasons why we've given so little space to these 'scandals' is because most of these guys were part of a political culture that persecuted heterosexual men for acting like---heterosexuals. Some have been real cads, but that's hardly reason to lock them up. The only ones who really deserve any jail time are guys like Anthony Wiener, who compromised national security by sexting on a government phone storing sensitive information. Or guys like former Seattle Mayor Ed Murray, who committed actual homosexual rape.
However, in the upside-down world of the Whacko Left, a man who shows any sign of having functioning testosterone is a horror who must be suppressed. It's like being born White or believing in God: all perfectly natural things to normal people, but signs of inherent character defect to the Left. As Left-Wing crackpot radio host Tom Hartman always says: "Testosterone is the world's most dangerous drug."
So why are so many of the Liberal leaders suddenly under fire for these scandals? We're going to go out on a limb here and suggest that this may be an organized Party Purge.
This has happened before on the Left. The 2016 Democratic Primaries had a lot of similarities to the 1968 events. In 1968, the Far Left moved to hijack the DNC and sabotaged the incumbent, Lyndon Johnson. Johnson was the last of the 'New Deal' Democrats and probably had a legitimate chance going head-to-head with Richard Nixon. In 2016, the incumbent Obama was more-or-less obliged to endorse the Clintons, though his sympathies were clearly with Sanders.
After the Far Left failed to gain control of the DNC in 1968, they geared up for 1972 by sabotaging as many old-school Democrats as possible to get their own candidate, George McGovern, nominated. What we're suggesting is that the same thing might be going on again. Considering that the McGovern/Carter/Clinton Faction were radicals of 1972---and they're the ones being targeted today---we can imagine how extreme their intended replacements are going to be. Sanders himself was barely one step away from outright Bolshevism himself. We easily could have had 2017 America looking like 1917 Russia if things had gone in Sanders' favor.
The DNC Election in 2017 very nearly went for Keith Ellison, a deep-dyed radical, who lost to a Clinton-backed candidate by only 8%. The DNC Election is a very clear indication that the radicals are making power-plays.
Could it be then that the blitz of 'sex scandals' on the Liberal Left is a way to clear out the 'old guard' and bring in even more radical elements? It could be. It seems as though a lot of the men being accused are disproportionately men of the Clinton Faction and a corresponding number of so-called 'progressives' doing the accusing.
But if we're seeing a repeat of 1972 on the way to 2020, take heart. 1972 was a crushing Electoral win for the Republicans; and Trump can no doubt wipe out any candidate whom the Radical Left might offer.
Tuesday, November 28, 2017
ALT-RINO WINTRICH JAILED FOR BEATING GIRL
Here we are nearly two decades into the 21st Century, and it seems like we have to explain things to some men that boys used to understand no later than Kindergarten or so. Let's start with one basic tenet:
Real men do not beat up or assault women.
True, sometimes a man has to act in self-defense; but even that is no excuse for excessive retaliation. But, for some reason, there's a contingent on the Far Right who seems to have absorbed the Leftist idea from Hollywood that women are fair game to be roughed-up like men. We can expect that the modern Media---filled as it is with resentful homosexuals and other perverts---but from Conservatives (or those who claim the title) we must expect higher standards and better behavior.
This phenomenon is especially blatant in the Manosphere and their confederates among the so-called Alt-Right. Red Pill writers like Dalrock, Roosh V, and Matt Forney praise domestic violence. Others like Rollo Tomassi and Chateau Heartiste teach that women are no better than chattel. Vox Day and Andrew Anglin are notorious for vicious troll attacks against women. Most of these writers are probably latent homosexuals, and some such as Jack Donovan, Milo Yiannapoulous, and Lucien Wintrich overtly so. They make heroes out of scumbags like Nathan Damigo who beat up girls half their size.
The aforementioned Lucian Wintrich is the latest girl-beater who's now sitting in a Connecticut jail after losing it during a speech and pouncing on a female protester. Wintrich was giving a speech at the University of Connecticut when a woman appeared to take some papers from the podium.
So what would have been the masculine response to such a situation? Wintrich could have calmly asked for the papers back. If she refused, go on with the speech ex tempore or move on to other topics. Treated the whole thing as rather humorous, in other words.
But Wintrich flew into a rage, jumped off the podium and attacked the woman with all the suppressed rage of his type. Police had to pull him off and dragged him out of the building as he screamed hysterically.
"I can confirm that the speaker has been arrested and is in police custody." a university spokeswoman told the Corporate Media. "There are no other arrests or any injuries."
Some may be inclined to defend Wintrich. But let's ask this question: how did his actions benefit the Conservative cause in any way, shape, or form? We hardly need to give examples of how the Corporate Media is spinning this story. But that aside, when 'conservatives' behave like liberals it doesn't win us any support from the general public. Why? Because nearly all Moderates and even a few Liberals know that it's wrong for boys to beat up on girls.
And Wintrich should have known better. Some Corporate Media jackass assaulted him last Spring at the White House. That incident certainly did little to dispel the public's negative opinions of the MSM.
We don't need Right-Wing versions of Keith Olbermann. We aren't trying to impose a 'new order' on society like the Left is. We hold that our values are really mainstream values, based upon centuries of tradition and learning. Our ideals don't need force to validate them. We use force to defend them, as Wintrich is going to learn when he appears before a magistrate tomorrow.
Real men do not beat up or assault women.
True, sometimes a man has to act in self-defense; but even that is no excuse for excessive retaliation. But, for some reason, there's a contingent on the Far Right who seems to have absorbed the Leftist idea from Hollywood that women are fair game to be roughed-up like men. We can expect that the modern Media---filled as it is with resentful homosexuals and other perverts---but from Conservatives (or those who claim the title) we must expect higher standards and better behavior.
This phenomenon is especially blatant in the Manosphere and their confederates among the so-called Alt-Right. Red Pill writers like Dalrock, Roosh V, and Matt Forney praise domestic violence. Others like Rollo Tomassi and Chateau Heartiste teach that women are no better than chattel. Vox Day and Andrew Anglin are notorious for vicious troll attacks against women. Most of these writers are probably latent homosexuals, and some such as Jack Donovan, Milo Yiannapoulous, and Lucien Wintrich overtly so. They make heroes out of scumbags like Nathan Damigo who beat up girls half their size.
The aforementioned Lucian Wintrich is the latest girl-beater who's now sitting in a Connecticut jail after losing it during a speech and pouncing on a female protester. Wintrich was giving a speech at the University of Connecticut when a woman appeared to take some papers from the podium.
So what would have been the masculine response to such a situation? Wintrich could have calmly asked for the papers back. If she refused, go on with the speech ex tempore or move on to other topics. Treated the whole thing as rather humorous, in other words.
But Wintrich flew into a rage, jumped off the podium and attacked the woman with all the suppressed rage of his type. Police had to pull him off and dragged him out of the building as he screamed hysterically.
"I can confirm that the speaker has been arrested and is in police custody." a university spokeswoman told the Corporate Media. "There are no other arrests or any injuries."
Some may be inclined to defend Wintrich. But let's ask this question: how did his actions benefit the Conservative cause in any way, shape, or form? We hardly need to give examples of how the Corporate Media is spinning this story. But that aside, when 'conservatives' behave like liberals it doesn't win us any support from the general public. Why? Because nearly all Moderates and even a few Liberals know that it's wrong for boys to beat up on girls.
And Wintrich should have known better. Some Corporate Media jackass assaulted him last Spring at the White House. That incident certainly did little to dispel the public's negative opinions of the MSM.
We don't need Right-Wing versions of Keith Olbermann. We aren't trying to impose a 'new order' on society like the Left is. We hold that our values are really mainstream values, based upon centuries of tradition and learning. Our ideals don't need force to validate them. We use force to defend them, as Wintrich is going to learn when he appears before a magistrate tomorrow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)