Dr. Rookh Kshatriya---one of the early intellectuals of the Manosphere, and one of the few in that community who still writes anything worth reading---has also written a piece analyzing events in Toronto. For those not familiar with Dr. Kshatriya's writings, he has postulated a theory that Anglo-American culture has become more sexually repressive since the advent of Radical Feminism despite outward appearances. The so-called Cultural Elites, to maintain this illusion, promote what he calls a Sexual False Consciousness.
Sexual False Consciousness may be briefly explained as the difference between how the media portrays the average person's sexual/romantic lives against what happens in reality.
"In the wake of Minassian's foolish deed, almost every Anglosphere news outlet has been asking 'What is an INCEL' as if INCELs constituted only a tiny minority! In reality about one-third of people under 30 in the United States are involuntarily celibate, according to the US Center for Disease Control."
Yes, this is true. And it also illustrates the number of men vulnerable to radicalization is very high. This, by the way, is exactly why we've said that censorship will fail.
It's a biological and sociological fact that sexually deprived men become more aggressive. It the days before Cultural Marxism took over America, society channeled that aggression into constructive pursuits. Thus we had all-male venues like the military, team sports, commerce, politics, and other professions. But our postmodern dystopia not only represses men sexually; it also closes avenues of achievement to them by subordinating them to women and homosexuals. Then, to make it worse; the media taunts them by treating them as 'losers' if they aren't having regular sex.
As evidence of this, notice that the American males of 'Generation Snowflake' are simultaneously the most pampered and the most ruthlessly violent men in our history. They run to Safe Spaces at the slightest affront; but think nothing of slaughtering dozens of innocents in schools, churches, or concerts.
As a medical professional, Dr. Kshatriya understands what social engineers don't: that gender differences are fixed and that they cannot be legislated out of existence. Laws need to be reformed and reconstructed along those lines.
And here the good doctor puts his finger on the root of the problem: "Media-induced Sexual False Consciousness is rampant in our society...Everyone has to keep silent while the naked emperor of sexual liberation walks abroad, pretending that they too are banging models every night. Of course almost no one is; but none can break ranks to discuss openly the frigid hostility of most Anglo-American females for fear of ridicule and ostracism."
As a doctor, Kshatriya knows that the first step to effecting a cure is admitting that a problem really exists. That's as true of social diseases as it is of physical ones.
Since the Election of 2016, we have a window of opportunity to address these problems. Trump has shown us that the Corporate Media is built upon a tissue of lies spun by ignoramuses and degenerates---and can be ignored with impunity. He's also shown us that Political Correctness is a paper tiger and men can push back against it. What Dr. Kshatriya calls "the fear of ridicule and ostracism" must be overcome if we want to put a permanent stop to this whole 'Gender War' nonsense. And that nonsense is being pushed both by the Feminist Left and the Red Pill Alt-RINO Right.
David Futrelle---who is a male feminist and far-Left politically---wrote an editorial yesterday in Elle Magazine about the social dangers posed by radicalized men in the INCEL movement. Futrelle's piece has a lot of predictably Radical Feminist bias; but his analysis of what fuels INCEL (and the Red Pills generally) is generally accurate. We're going to offer some commentary here on the passages that show some insight and summarize with its relevance to us as Conservatives.
"What makes the INCEL subculture so dangerous for young men who engage in it" Futrelle says, "is that it takes the bitterness and sadness we sometimes feel when faced with sexual and romantic frustrations and turns this misery into a mode of being. Instead of encouraging them to move on from their disappointments, the INCEL subculture encourages young men to stew in their own bitterness."
This is entirely true; at least as far as the objectives of INCEL leaders and pundits go. The problem that I've seen among most in this movement is that sexual/romantic frustration is an effect; rather than a cause of their radicalism. However, Futrelle is correct in that men who've become emotionally vulnerable are easy prey for Red Pill propaganda.
In our last article, we pointed out the desperate need for male leaders and men of maturity and experience to step up to the plate and start offering alternative advice to the Red Pills and the INCELs. The lack of these kinds of men is leaving the field wide-open for Radicals to recruit them.
Futrelle goes on to make another good point: "INCEL culture tells young men that their problems are unfixable...INCELs direct so much hatred at the outside world---and at women in particular---that it's easy to lose sight of the many ways that INCEL culture promotes a deep and hopeless form of self-hatred."
As a political 'Progressive', it's doubtful that Futrelle puts much stock in Classical Psychology, but he's basically explaining the same dynamic as what the Psychoanalysts call projection. To be specific: sexual frustration may not necessarily lead to self-hatred, but it does bring out such thoughts and suspicions. The INCEL propagandists validate those suspicions---and at the same time they cultivate in their dupes the belief that people outside of their victims' ego-fields are responsible for it. In other words, the typical INCEL feels worthless, but he believes that worthlessness has been imposed on him by others. It's not hard to see how men in this state of mind can become extremely dangerous. And their leaders, in turn, incite them to acts of violence which they themselves haven't the courage to commit.
Futrelle goes on to warn that "if these young men aren't stopped" there would be more like George Sodini, Eliot Roger, and Alec Minassian. Unfortunately, he's right about that too; although he doesn't explain here how they should be stopped. Of course, we can all point out that Feminism is radicalizing and cultivating self-hatred in women too. But that isn't the point.
The point is that the failure of Conservatives to address this issue of male radicalization is effectively ceding the Moral High Ground to the Left, like David Futrelle and the SPLC. We have seen some hope among Christian Conservatives like the Southern Baptist Convention and the Conference of Catholic Bishops. But much more needs to be done and said---especially by our political leadership. We need men like William F. Buckley who exorcised from Conservatism the Birchers and the Randians; the Alt-Right of his day.
Despite what the Red Pills say, maintaining the Moral High Ground is the key to our movement's ultimate victory. Without it, we're no better than the Left.
So it's happened yet again: one of the Red Pill disciples went berserk and hoped to impress his leaders by committing mass-murder. Alec Minassian by his own admission is part of the INCEL sect of the Manosphere. He was inspired by the murders committed by Eliot Roger in 2014---who also was a believer in INCEL.
The INCELs are somewhat similar to the MGTOWs of the Manosphere. The difference is that MGTOWs have no desire to have relationships with women; INCELs do have the desire but can't/won't act up on it. The term is a portmanteau of involuntarily celibate. Now most of us men are in this state from time to time, but INCELs consider this a permanent condition. The founders of the movement were reacting to a real social problem; the disparity in male to female ratios giving a lack of sexual opportunity. What they advocated were changes in laws---most of them quite sensible---to address the issue. Things like making fiancee visas easier to get, relaxing AOC laws, repealing many of the Clinton Era's politically-correct gender rules, etc.
But like the rest of the Manosphere, the INCELs became extremely radicalized. The sorts of men it came to attract were the lowest of social, political, and sexual misfits. These are the types of guys who wouldn't have success with women (or much of anything else) regardless of social conditions. Even under pagan tribalism, few fathers likely would even consent to sell their daughters to cretins like these. On their websites they hold Eliot Roger up as a hero and celebrate the anniversary of the Isla Vista killings. Men like these are losers no matter how you slice it.
One of the writers at Incel.me called 'BlkPllPres' was giddy with excitement over the attacks and bragged that Minassian had probably read his article published on March 18th. It's worth reading because it illustrates perfectly the mentality of these fools:
"I think that mass shootings are too pointless anyway. I want to see some mass food poisoning deaths, maybe a bomb or two, or hopefully somebody just uses a f----g truck to ram down roasties* {*a vulgar neologism invented by the Red Pill Cultists as a slur against women} at a school parade or something...The one I can't wait for, the one that will really punish normies* {*another bit of Red Pill parlance; 'normies' are normal men who have normal relationships with women---unlike these 'enlightened' ones who know better) and really punish society is when the first INCEL mass/serial rapes start occurring; when a guy leaves a manifesto just before killing himself admitting to all the rapes he's done. The will be the best ER* ever. {ER is their shorthand for 'Eliot Roger'; used to describe any terroristic act committed on behalf of their ideology}.
This goes on to explain why raping-sprees are so wonderful: "Because after the act, his victims don't just 'get to die' and their families 'move on.' These women will be traumatized and some might even kill themselves...their families will have to endure the shame that comes with this, the women will have to relive this every day and spend months or years in therapy sessions. Not to mention that we will be spamming the rapist's image and memeing him into an immortal internet presence like we have with Eliot Roger. They won't ever be able to forget; society won't be able to forget: and it is at that moment that normies will truly fear us."
Well---no: I doubt seriously that any normal, red-blooded man is going to cower in fear other men who go around raping defenseless women for sport. I think that, if this happened in reality, the INCELs would likely be hunted down by packs of vigilantes and the authorities would likely look the other way at such reprisals.
That aside, though, there's nothing in the above quote that's materially different from what the propagandists for ISIS and other Wahhabi cults write of their own strategies. Since we began this blog we have made it clear that one of Civilization's greatest threats are radical cults. Just like Wahhabism is not a religion but a cult; so the Red Pill is not a philosophy but a cult. And Canada---our neighbor to the north---has seen the bloody results of both cults when drawn to their logical conclusions.
How Canada will react is unknown; that country's commitment to free speech is not nearly as rigid as ours. And censorship is not the answer anyway. Our society needs leaders-----especially community leaders like pastors, bishops, local politicians, and local media figures to give the weight of their authority speaking out against the dangers of radicalization. And frankly men, collectively, need to do a better job of self-policing like our fathers and grandfathers did. When we start seeing young men in our circles drifting into radicalism---talk it out with them. A lot of these guys are in this spot because they lacked male mentoring. The Red Pill leaders---like ISIS---offers them respect and the opportunity 'to be somebody'. But these vulnerable men are so blinded at the prospects that they don't see the price tag attached. That's what mature men can show them.
Things continue to get worse for the Red Pill/Alt-RINO trolls. The character known on Twitter as 'Ricky Vaughn' as been exposed. Paul Nehlen, a candidate for the Congressional Seat vacated by Paul Ryan exposed Vaughn as a Manhattan financial consultant named Douglass Mackey. After Mackey approached Nehlen with a shady donation proposition (and Nehlen refused); Mackey went viral smearing Nehlen's character. And so, Nehlen decided, two can play at that game.
It's interesting that so many of the Red Pill gurus turn out to be engaged in marketing-related professions. The whole Game/PUA movement upon which the Red Pill is based is said to have been engineered by men in this line of work.
It's also quite noteworthy that these so-called 'Alphas' always turn out to be quite far from the swaggering, he-man image they project on the Internet. And generally their real-life unmanliness is in direct proportion to how big their mouths are online. As 'Ricky Vaughn', Mackey was one of the most vicious trolls; reports of him in reality show him to be a pasty, flabby milquetoast afraid of his own shadow. Unlike Vox Day and Andrew Anglin, Mackey even kept his online activities a secret from his parents.
"We were devastated this week to learn of Doug's beliefs and online activities." Scott Mackey, his father said, "They are antithetical to the values we hold and which he was raised. We are still trying to understand how he could have done something like this and hope that he will find some way to make amends for the harm that he's caused."
It can probably be explained this way: Mackey is the archetypical keyboard warrior. The Urban Dictionary defines personalities like his perfectly: "A person who, unable to express his anger through physical violence (owing to their physical weakness, lack of courage or conviction in real life), instead manifests said emotions through the textual medium of the Internet...Keyboard Warriors are generally identified by unnecessary rage in their communications and are regarded as losers by other virtual identities on the Internet." To this, we will add that they are usually regarded as losers by their offline peers as well.
Mackey was fired from his job as an economist at John Dunham & Associates in 2016; at the peak of his popularity as an Alt-RINO commentator. Dunham could not reveal the reasons for his termination because of New York State's labor laws. But I think that we can all draw our own conclusions about it.
President Trump's announcement last week that the US and North Korea were "already in high-level talks" ahead of a major summit either went completely ignored or contemptuously ridiculed by the Corporate Media. Although this summit will be the first meeting between the two countries' presidents ever; and the first step toward final peace on the Peninsula.
Trump made the announcement at Mar-a-Lago meeting with Japanese officials. While widely discussed and praised abroad, NBC was the only television network which bothered to report it. Even then, their White House 'correspondent' snorted opinions to the effect that Trump was 'selling out' to Kim; and interviewed one of the Bush-Era RINOs to back up the script.
However, articles in the CPC-run Chinese media---which is again proving itself more objective and informative than our allegedly 'free' press---explained that the driving force behind this latest rapprochement has been led by new South Korean President Moon. Moon negotiated not only the meeting with Trump; but a high-level meeting between Kim and Chinese President Xi. As a goodwill gesture, Kim has ordered a suspension of North Korea's nuclear-weapons testing. Moon has reciprocated by suspending propaganda broadcasts into the North. Moon and Kim are meeting in historic Panmujom later this week.
The Washington Post---for whatever their words are worth---claims that Secretary of State Pompeo has already made covert official visits to North Korea, but this has yet to be confirmed.
In 2016, President Kim expressed a desire to meet with Trump but this gesture was blocked by RINOs Tillerson and McMaster. Those two provocateurs nearly goaded Trump into a Second Korean War in 2017; and had it not been for the poltroonery of American military commanders, it might have happened. The Trump-Kim Summit should have been the Administration's first recourse.
Besides the Swamp RINOs; the Soros Syndicate, the Moonie Cult, the DNC, and other corrupt interests have sought war in Korea eagerly. They covet North Korean resources and the power that comes with controlling the DPRK's strategic geographic position. And of course they also deeply envy President Kim for having that kind of wealth and power.
After the recent debacles in Syria, it is refreshing to see Trump taking a completely different course in Korea. North Korea has a lot of faults as a State, but they have been the ones seeking and offering peace since the 1990's. Now that we've had a regime change of our own and South Koreans were able to elect a non-CIA controlled president for once, that peace finally looks possible.
With the exception of The Wichita Eagle, most of the media ignored the guilty verdict handed down on Wednesday against three Kansas men. Gavin Wright, Curtis Allen, and Patrick Stein were convicted of plotting a massive terrorist attack against an immigrant community center in Garden City, Kansas.
The community center is owned by Somalian immigrants and has a residential complex, a mosque, and some small businesses. According to an FBI spokesman, the trio plotted to use a series of four truck-bombs and the explosives they had manufactured would have leveled the block. The Kansas City Star reported in March that the three belonged to a group of yahoos calling itself the 'Kansas Security Force' and fancied themselves leaders of a new Crusade.
"The Department of Justice is resolute every day in fighting terrorist threats both foreign and domestic," Jeff Sessions said, "The defendants in this case acted with clear premeditation in an attempt to kill people based on their religion and national origin. That's not simply illegal; it's immoral and unacceptable and we aren't going to stand for it. Today's verdict is a significant victory against domestic terrorism and hate crimes."
Now wait a moment, here. Doesn't the Whacko Left and their parrots in the MSM tell us constantly that the Trump Administration is full of White Supremacists and Anti-Moslem bigots? Maybe the reason that the story got so little coverage is that it didn't fit 'the narrative.'
But leaving all these idiots aside, the real hero of this story was a Kansas man named Dan Day. Day not only reported his suspicions to the FBI---which led to the investigation---he risked his own life by voluntarily acting as an FBI informant and then openly testifying of his role at the trial. That took some incredible courage; as he was up a gang of fanatics who had no scruple against committing murder. Sessions personally cited Day for his bravery and credited him for "thwarting the attack and saving hundreds of lives."
Good men doing good things: our media ignores that too. Let's all be thankful though that a few men like Dan Day are out there making the world a better place.
As if we needed any further proof that the so-called 'Alt-Right' is really a Left-Wing Reactionary movement; Red Pill cultist Vox Day has been spending the better part of the last week bashing Conservatives. Citing pseudoscience from The Unz Review---a notoriously anti-Semitic tabloid---Vox claims that "Conservatism is unviable because it denies inequality. All unviable political identities have set themselves up against science, history, and observable reality. Remember, the Red Pill is reality."
Well, no it isn't. And Conservatives don't deny inequality. We understand that there are differences among the human race. But we believe as well in the Law of Compensation, of which Vox and other Red Pills are wholly ignorant.
One of America's first native philosophers, Ralph Waldo Emerson, explained the Law of Compensation as a moral justification for equality. The concept didn't originate with him; and most of us probably know and live by this principle under various other names. The Law of Compensation simply says that human beings compensate for weaknesses and deficiencies by excelling in particular ways. The most common way we experience this is through gender-relations and marriage. The strengths and weaknesses inherent in each gender finds compensation by bonding sexually or romantically. Most of us know this as complementarian---another concept which the Red Pills also deny.
It also happens in society at large and is a well-known psychological fact. People who are limited in their abilities in one area compensate by excellence in another field. This is so well established that Alfred Adler and Maria Montessori built whole schools of psychology around the concept. We also see it in physical debilities. It's well-known, for example, that the blind develop extraordinary senses like hearing. It's also well-known that infertile women often make the best nurses and elementary teachers.
This idea of compensation leads naturally to social cooperation; and by extension, Legal Equality. As our Founding Fathers expressed it: "We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights."
And the Founders themselves based the idea on the principles of Christianity. The Catechism of the Catholic Church expresses it this way: "Created in the Image of the One True God and equally endowed with rational souls, all men have the same nature and the same origin. Redeemed by the Sacrifice of Christ, all are called to participate in the same Divine Beatitude; all therefore enjoy an equal dignity...Human talents, however, are not distributed equally. These differences, though, belong to God's Plan; which wills that each receives what he needs from others; and that those endowed with particular benefits share them with those who need them." (iii:1934-1937, passim).
If man, therefore, is equal in the eyes of God, Law, and Nature---why do these three ever punish those who compensate in negative ways (i.e. sin, crime, and unnatural behavior)? This is because the only actual 'inequality' between human beings is moral inequality. It's actually the Liberals and the Left who deny inequality; because they hold the extremist position that all behaviors are morally equivalent.
The Red Pills swing to the opposite extreme and create a moral dogma that inequality stems from an inherent biological inferiority in most; while they alone---the 'Alphas'---are superior. This is also an extremist position because they create a subjective definition of superiority and derive false moral absolutes from them. Liberalism denies reality; the Red Pills offer a counterfeit reality.
At any rate, Conservatives shouldn't worry too much about Vox' predictions. His track-record at successful predictions is worse than most commercial fortune-tellers. And Conservatives will be here long after the Red Pill is forgotten.
