One exception this time is Brett Stevens, author of the blog Amerika. Like most Alphas, Stevens believes himself a great genius though what he typically writes is laughably absurd. However, it's not so humorous this time. Stevens has a unique take on solving religious violence in article titled "John Earnest Shoots Up Southern California Synagogue," in which he argues that, ---well, we'll let him explain:
"This action seems misplaced to me for two reasons: 1. Identifies the wrong enemy. Maybe Jews are as horrible as some of you say, but our problem began when we accepted equality/individualism as our new god, culture, and purpose. We have been hijacked by a mental virus that comes to us in symbols that sound good, but are reality replacements. If Jews are a problem, they only arrived after this virus weakened us and made us crazy. Removing Jews will not fix our problem; we made a bad choice and we need to un-do it. 2. Shoots the wrong people. If I were going to go out there and slaughter anyone, I would start totaling white Leftists. They are the ones who act affirmatively to perpetuate and promulgate the virus of equality/individualism, and their removal is effective. Anders Breivik and Tim McVeigh had the right idea; Robert Bowers and John T. Earnest took the wrong approach; Brenton Tarrant, who shot Muslims, is somewhere in the middle but would have been more effective shooting white Leftists. We do not want them in our gene pool anyway, and they will do nothing but subvert us in a class, resource, ethnic/racial, or political war."
What a scumbag Stevens is. This is whole passage is typically Red Pill arrogance. They think their supposed superiority entitles them to dispose of human life in this cavalier fashion. This makes them no better than the Communists: even though their social goals differ their means of implementing these goals are identical.
Also characteristic of Red Pills, Stevens is a big advocate of the 'Civil War 2.0' nonsense. Beginning with Pat Buchanan at the 1992 GOP Convention, Conservative pundits and leaders have spoken frequently of a Cultural Civil War. But they are referring to a 'war of ideas;' that battle we're fighting against the Left is spiritual and ideological. The Red Pills mean a literal war. "As the West spirals down into oblivion," reads the first line of Stevens' article.
"We are fighting an invisible, intangible, and infectious enemy. Blacks, Jews, and Muslims are just some of its many tools."
In the first place, the West is not 'spiraling into oblivion.' With the advent of the Trump Administration, BREXIT, and other popular movements, we're seeing pushback against Cultural Marxism. Even institutions infested with Radical Left ideology, like Academia, are becoming more emboldened to fight back. It will take time, but we're winning without firing a shot. The Deep State never rebuilt the Twin Towers; President Macron has vowed that Notre Dame will be rebuilt within five years.
In second place, Stevens and other Alphas are so blinded by their own hubris that they fail to see the enormous contributions that American Blacks, Jews, and Moslems are making to the Conservative Movement.
"The important thing to remember: we need to destroy the policy of diversity, and send everyone home, instead of killing them. This requires that we abolish civil rights, affirmative action, human rights, equality, and other egalitarianism/individualism based programs. It may require that we shoot a bunch of Leftists, but only after we have tried everything else."
No---the important thing to remember is that being an American means being committed to the ideals embodied in the Constitution. American does not refer to a specific race or tribe. A common Red Pill meme is that "Diversity + Proximity= War." Nothing could be further from the truth. In a free society, diversity contributes to things like Free Enterprise and freedom of expression.
But the Red Pills fear Freedom just as much as the Left---and for the same reasons. They are failures and losers who need scapegoats so that they can play the Victim Card. Understanding that is the real way to curb radical violence. Once dissatisfied and disillusioned men realize what kinds of yahoos are really trying to lead them, they'll turn their backs upon them and work on improving themselves.
The author of that article is ignorant and offensive at the same time!! Someone bring the hook and drag his sorry ass off Stage Left!!
ReplyDeleteDiversity + Proximity= War. Nothing could be further from the truth. In a free society, diversity contributes to things like Free Enterprise and freedom of expression.
ReplyDeleteWell... i would actually say it's trivially true.
Going backwards, proximity is obvious because if you're on opposite sides of the world, you can't exactly kill each other (well, not until we developed the weapons to fix that). Obviously the involved parties must first be close enough to actually fight.
With the second part, it depends on the definition but there must also be a difference in the involved parties as well in order to fight.
There's the rule fire requires a triangle: fuel, heat, oxygen. The red pillers are doing the equivalent of arguing that forest fires are imminent because we have trees (fuel) outside (oxygen) in the sun (heat).
Likewise while technically true and every war requires diversity and proximity, that doesn't mean every instance of those two things is going to lead to war.
After all, men and women have proven for millennia that diversity + proximity sometimes leads to marriage.
(Though you're welcome to make a war joke there too.)