TOP NYC SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR CAUGHT IN STING OPERATION

  While the unfortunate children and teens caught in the very politically-correct New York City Public School System are away on Winter Recess, the System's 'openly gay' Deputy Chief-of-Staff David Hay decided to visit his home state of Wisconsin. He was going to meet a young boy whom he'd encountered online to help him explore alternative sexuality and to accept his sexuality. 

  Sadly for Mr. Hay, instead of falling into the arms of a male lover, he was greeted with the outstretched arms of Winnebago County Sheriff John Matz, who'd been part of a Sting Operation. Hay now sits in a cell adorned in a black and white striped suit, bewailing his fate. 

   It's not known how old the 'boy' was supposed to be; but the law under which Hay was charged specifically indicts "someone who uses a computerized communication system to communicate with an individual who the actor believes or has reason to believe has not attained the age of 16 years with intent to have sexual contact or sexual intercourse with the individual.” These are boys 15 and younger whom Hay was preying upon. 

  Hay drew down a fat $168,000 salary from the City. He was in charge of enforcing 'equality'; that is allowing homosexuals and other perverts access to the public schools. After all, New York City officially recognizes 31 distinct genders: and Obama, DeBlasio and other Leftist whack-jobs assure all of us that these policies are all about pride and not grooming. How you can teach children about homosexuality without grooming them, they haven't explained: but it's hateful and ignorant to believe that it's not possible.

  According to the Left, it's a few Bronze Age bigots who don't accept the New Science; to wit, that gender has no basis in biology. Other than a few celebrity scientists who offer no actual scientific proof of this, biology teaches us exactly the opposite. Modern Science from Darwin and Freud onward---men who were almost all Atheists, Agnostics, and Evolutionists---even acknowledged that sexual differentiation lay at the base of Medicine, Psychology, and Civilization itself. It happens that Religion and Philosophy teach the same truths; whether by revelation, logic, or simple common sense. 

   Dr. Iwan Bloch, a 20th Century scientist who was largely responsible for making human sexuality a legitimate subject for Academic research wrote only a few decades ago that:

  "It is unquestionable that evolution and the progress of civilization have resulted in an extremely marked differentiation between the two sexes, and for this reason the formation of a so-called 'third sex' in which these sexual differences are obscured can only be regarded as a markedly retrogressive step...It is indeed possible that this 'third sex'---that hermaphrodites, homosexuals, and other 'intermediate stages'---also play a certain part in the progress of civilization. But their significance is slight and limited, if for this reason alone because from these individuals the possibility of transmission by inheritance of valuable peculiarities is cut off, and hence the possibility of a future perfectibility of true progress, is excluded. There are two sexes only upon which every true advance in civilization depends---the genuine man and the genuine woman. All other varieties are no more than phantoms, monstrosities, and vestiges of primitive sexual conditions."

  And again:

   " That the comparative obliteration of sexual contrasts among the lower orders of modern society is a vestigial relic of primitive conditions is shown also by the primeval history of the nations. The idea already appearing in the Biblical creation myth, and the thought later expressed by Plato that the first human being was originally both man and woman and that the woman was formed out of this primeval being Adam---this pregnant thought merely expresses the indifference of the sexes among savage peoples and in the primitive history of mankind. The hermaphrodite of ancient art is, like the man-woman of modern Feminism, an atavism: a retrogression to these long-past stages, of which we have only the above-mentioned vestiges to remind us...Sexual differentiation stands and falls with civilization. The former is the indispensable preliminary of the latter. Destroy it, and the whole course of development will be reversed."

   Except for the theology involved, it's doubtful that most Christians would argue with these points. Don't let anyone fool you into believing that objections to homo acceptance only stem from religious prejudice. The objections are based upon solid science as well; and ignoring the reality of that will only lead to more victims of their pernicious ideology.