Simon Radecki is sitting in a Pennsylvania jail after threatening to kidnap Senator Pat Toomey's daughter during a Town Hall meeting. Radecki is another radicalized, alienated male who worked sporadically in the video-game industry and drifted about embracing radical Left-Wing causes.
During a question-and-answer session at the Town Hall, Radecki arose with a vicious look on his face and asked Senator Toomey the following:
"We've been here for awhile, so you probably haven't seen the news. Can you confirm whether or not your daughter Bridget has been kidnapped?"
The stunned audience, reporters, police, and Senator Toomey himself began wondering if this nutcase had actually harmed the Senator's family. The police whisked Radecki away as the Anarchist screamed incoherently about DACA, President Trump, and Republicans in general. The General Manager of PBS-39 TV, who hosted the event, stated it was "one of the scariest things I've ever seen."
Fortunately, the Senator's daughter was unharmed; although doubtless police and likely the FBI are investigating the potential of a larger plot. Radecki is currently being held for Disorderly Conduct.
The Corporate Media naturally is downplaying the incident, without mentioning that Senator Toomey has been the targets of multiple threats recently. Not to mention also that barely a few weeks ago, House Majority Whip John Scalise was shot by an Anarchist attempting to assassinate the GOP Congressional leadership.
As is true of many perpetrators of these incidents, Radecki is not even from Pennsylvania. He is a native of Minnesota and a former campaign worker for arch-Leftist Senator Al Franken. Radecki is also likely a homosexual; he was one of the organizers of the militant National LGBTQ Task Force. He was also involved in several anti-2nd Amendment groups.
At least Radecki is now in a place where can do no further damage to society. Threatening to kidnap political opponents' children sounds like something from the Italian Red Brigade or the Baader-Meinhof Gang in 1970s Europe. It doesn't belong in America.
Wednesday, September 6, 2017
Tuesday, September 5, 2017
DACA BEHIND THE MEDIA SMOKESCREEN
I don't recall much of Jeff Sessions' career as a US Senator, but he is certainly in his element as US Attorney-General. Sessions today released a two-page statement giving his thoughts on President Trump's decision to repeal DACA. The statement shows that Sessions is a man possessed of an above-average legal mind; and thus far it is the best defense of the President's policy produced.
Sessions presents three facts about DACA: all buried by the Corporate Media. The first of these is that DACA was illegally implemented by President Obama in 2012:
"The DACA Program was implemented in 2012 and essentially provided a legal status including work authorization and other benefits including Social Security to 800,000 mostly adult illegal aliens. The policy was implemented unilaterally amid great controversy and legal concern after Congress rejected Legislative proposals to extend similar benefits, on numerous occasions, to this same group of illegal aliens. In other words, the Executive Branch, through DACA, deliberately sought to achieve what the Legislative Branch specifically refused to authorize on multiple occasions."
The Corporate Media, of course, is leaving out that little detail. Now Sessions cites several legal opinions to the effect of DACA's unconstitutional implementation, but the important precedent here is that the Trump Administration is striking a blow at what has been termed The Imperial Presidency.
The Imperial Presidency refers to a tendency manifested in the late 20th and early 21st Centuries of the Executive Branch ruling outside our constitutional system of Checks-and-Balances. Presidents and the federal bureaucrats in his Cabinet simply made policies with little or no Congressional input. Frequently the Courts were called upon to uphold or deny such policies and give their rulings the force of actual law. Needless to say, this tendency was a huge advantage to the Deep State. Trump and Sessions are signaling here that this policy is at an end and that Congress is coming back to rightful position as a law-making body.
The second point Sessions makes about DACA is that the policy itself was badly flawed and that legal challenges to it were already underway:
"It is with these duties and principles in mind, and in light of imminent litigation, that we reviewed the Obama Administration's DACA policy. Our collective wisdom is that the DACA policy is vulnerable to the same legal and constitutional challenges that the Courts recognized with the DAPA Program; which was enjoined on a nationwide basis in a decision upheld by the US 5th Circuit Court. The 5th Circuit specifically concluded that DACA had not been implemented in a fashion that allowed sufficient discretion, and that DAPA was foreclosed by 'Congress' careful plan.' In other words, it was inconsistent with constitutional Separation of Powers. That decision was affirmed by the US Supreme Court."
Thus it happens that, even if Trump favored DACA, impending Court challenges would have forbidden him to implement it. The Justice Department was evidently reviewing the case and found it legally indefensible. Did the Corporate Media tell us anything about 'imminent litigation'? No---they have spun the story to accuse Trump falsely of doing what Obama actually did: acting unilaterally.
And we can also deduce from this that the usual pack of State Attorneys-General who are threatening to challenge Trump's decision are engaging in nothing but a publicity stunt; because the Courts are already decided on the issue.
Sessions also addresses the well-meaning organizations who have legitimate concerns about those affected by DACA's repeal. He reminds them that DACA itself started the crisis.
"The effect of this unilateral executive amnesty, among other things, contributed to a surge of unaccompanied minors on the Southern Border that yielded terrible humanitarian consequences."
In fact in 2012, the United Nations, the foreign press, and human-rights groups---in short, everybody except the US Media and the Obama Administration---were calling the situation a humanitarian disaster. Outside of the regions directly impacted, few Americans knew that thousands of children and legal minors literally were being dumped at the US-Mexico border with no provision for placing or caring for them. These children and minors were being warehoused anywhere and everywhere space was available. It was a disaster indeed, several of the youngsters died either en route to the US or even while here.
But the Corporate Media didn't criticize Obama then, just as they haven't brought up the crisis now. By repealing DACA, Trump is ending one of the major blunders of the Obama Administration before further damage is done. As Sessions says, this is what we elected Trump to do. As for the Corporate Media, nobody elected them to do anything.
Sessions presents three facts about DACA: all buried by the Corporate Media. The first of these is that DACA was illegally implemented by President Obama in 2012:
"The DACA Program was implemented in 2012 and essentially provided a legal status including work authorization and other benefits including Social Security to 800,000 mostly adult illegal aliens. The policy was implemented unilaterally amid great controversy and legal concern after Congress rejected Legislative proposals to extend similar benefits, on numerous occasions, to this same group of illegal aliens. In other words, the Executive Branch, through DACA, deliberately sought to achieve what the Legislative Branch specifically refused to authorize on multiple occasions."
The Corporate Media, of course, is leaving out that little detail. Now Sessions cites several legal opinions to the effect of DACA's unconstitutional implementation, but the important precedent here is that the Trump Administration is striking a blow at what has been termed The Imperial Presidency.
The Imperial Presidency refers to a tendency manifested in the late 20th and early 21st Centuries of the Executive Branch ruling outside our constitutional system of Checks-and-Balances. Presidents and the federal bureaucrats in his Cabinet simply made policies with little or no Congressional input. Frequently the Courts were called upon to uphold or deny such policies and give their rulings the force of actual law. Needless to say, this tendency was a huge advantage to the Deep State. Trump and Sessions are signaling here that this policy is at an end and that Congress is coming back to rightful position as a law-making body.
The second point Sessions makes about DACA is that the policy itself was badly flawed and that legal challenges to it were already underway:
"It is with these duties and principles in mind, and in light of imminent litigation, that we reviewed the Obama Administration's DACA policy. Our collective wisdom is that the DACA policy is vulnerable to the same legal and constitutional challenges that the Courts recognized with the DAPA Program; which was enjoined on a nationwide basis in a decision upheld by the US 5th Circuit Court. The 5th Circuit specifically concluded that DACA had not been implemented in a fashion that allowed sufficient discretion, and that DAPA was foreclosed by 'Congress' careful plan.' In other words, it was inconsistent with constitutional Separation of Powers. That decision was affirmed by the US Supreme Court."
Thus it happens that, even if Trump favored DACA, impending Court challenges would have forbidden him to implement it. The Justice Department was evidently reviewing the case and found it legally indefensible. Did the Corporate Media tell us anything about 'imminent litigation'? No---they have spun the story to accuse Trump falsely of doing what Obama actually did: acting unilaterally.
And we can also deduce from this that the usual pack of State Attorneys-General who are threatening to challenge Trump's decision are engaging in nothing but a publicity stunt; because the Courts are already decided on the issue.
Sessions also addresses the well-meaning organizations who have legitimate concerns about those affected by DACA's repeal. He reminds them that DACA itself started the crisis.
"The effect of this unilateral executive amnesty, among other things, contributed to a surge of unaccompanied minors on the Southern Border that yielded terrible humanitarian consequences."
In fact in 2012, the United Nations, the foreign press, and human-rights groups---in short, everybody except the US Media and the Obama Administration---were calling the situation a humanitarian disaster. Outside of the regions directly impacted, few Americans knew that thousands of children and legal minors literally were being dumped at the US-Mexico border with no provision for placing or caring for them. These children and minors were being warehoused anywhere and everywhere space was available. It was a disaster indeed, several of the youngsters died either en route to the US or even while here.
But the Corporate Media didn't criticize Obama then, just as they haven't brought up the crisis now. By repealing DACA, Trump is ending one of the major blunders of the Obama Administration before further damage is done. As Sessions says, this is what we elected Trump to do. As for the Corporate Media, nobody elected them to do anything.
BATTLE OF DEIR EZZUR ENDS WITH ISIS DEFEAT
One of the most protracted battles of the war against ISIS concluded this morning successfully. For the last two weeks it had been rumored that a decisive maneuver was about to be struck against Deir Ezzur, a strategic city in Eastern Syria which had been the site of pitched battles for nearly two years.
Syrian President Assad announced just minutes ago that the city had been liberated and congratulated his army and its Allies, whose joint effort made today's victory possible. Details are still forthcoming; but approximately four hours ago, Russian warships launched a Kalibr Cruise Missile strike with pinpoint precision on the ISIS lines. The breach was filled with Syrian T-72 tanks, which rolled into the city followed by the Syrian 17th Infantry Division. Syrian commandoes had previously parachuted into the city and secured an airbase. The two units met at that point, and the Syrian flag raised.
ISIS resistance is reportedly very light. It's not known at this writing whether the bulk of the Jihadists have surrendered, or whether they have evacuated the city. At any rate, Al Manar News Lebanon is reporting that residents of Deir Ezzur have poured into the streets and celebrations have erupted throughout the city without incident. The Iranian Media is reporting that the ISIS commanders deserted early in the fight.
Prior to the war, Deir Ezzur was a city of about a quarter-million people. It was the heart of Syria's oil industry and also home to one of the country's main medical complexes. ISIS is known to have taken over both of these: selling oil on the Black Market in one sector while using the medical complex to manufacture Methamphetamines and perform hideous tortures and organ-harvesting operations.
Militarily, Deir Ezzur was important because it commands the southern road into Raqqa---ISIS' capital and now the last-remaining major city under ISIS control.
Deir Ezzur was also home to many Christians, especially of the Armenian Orthodox Church. The name 'Deir' is actually the Arab word for 'monastery' and refers to the historic ancient monasteries of the Desert Fathers who lived in that region in very ancient times. It's unknown as of now to what extent the ISIS barbarians ethnically cleansed the city. At one time, ISIS leaders officially changed the name of the city because of its Christian connotations.
The scourge of ISIS, though, is one step closer to ultimate defeat.
Syrian President Assad announced just minutes ago that the city had been liberated and congratulated his army and its Allies, whose joint effort made today's victory possible. Details are still forthcoming; but approximately four hours ago, Russian warships launched a Kalibr Cruise Missile strike with pinpoint precision on the ISIS lines. The breach was filled with Syrian T-72 tanks, which rolled into the city followed by the Syrian 17th Infantry Division. Syrian commandoes had previously parachuted into the city and secured an airbase. The two units met at that point, and the Syrian flag raised.
ISIS resistance is reportedly very light. It's not known at this writing whether the bulk of the Jihadists have surrendered, or whether they have evacuated the city. At any rate, Al Manar News Lebanon is reporting that residents of Deir Ezzur have poured into the streets and celebrations have erupted throughout the city without incident. The Iranian Media is reporting that the ISIS commanders deserted early in the fight.
Prior to the war, Deir Ezzur was a city of about a quarter-million people. It was the heart of Syria's oil industry and also home to one of the country's main medical complexes. ISIS is known to have taken over both of these: selling oil on the Black Market in one sector while using the medical complex to manufacture Methamphetamines and perform hideous tortures and organ-harvesting operations.
Militarily, Deir Ezzur was important because it commands the southern road into Raqqa---ISIS' capital and now the last-remaining major city under ISIS control.
Deir Ezzur was also home to many Christians, especially of the Armenian Orthodox Church. The name 'Deir' is actually the Arab word for 'monastery' and refers to the historic ancient monasteries of the Desert Fathers who lived in that region in very ancient times. It's unknown as of now to what extent the ISIS barbarians ethnically cleansed the city. At one time, ISIS leaders officially changed the name of the city because of its Christian connotations.
The scourge of ISIS, though, is one step closer to ultimate defeat.
Monday, September 4, 2017
MANOSPHERE CHUMPS AGAINST TRADITIONAL WOMEN
The Alt-RINOs in the so-called 'Manosphere' are the antithesis of Conservatism. They are actually Leftist in the philosophy while Far-Right in their rhetoric. As another example of this, Roosh Valizedeh's infamous Return of Kings blog published an article today warning men of the 'hazards' in relationships with traditional women.
The article was written by one Chris George, a Game/PUA advocate. Now PUA is nothing but Socialist/Feminist 'free love' rebranded as male empowerment. George admits as much claiming in his bio as "questing for the perfect balance between family life and building a modern-day harem." Naturally, traditional marriage or complementary relationships are anathema to both Feminists and Red Pills. Both are gender-supremacist movements and both gender equality and polarity are despised concepts between them.
George gives us three excuses men should use for avoiding traditional women. The first of these is that traditional women are too dependent. This is a rather strange position for a cult that is strongly opposed to even mild female independence. George explains that "If you can barely afford to have a good life on your own, when you start 'providing' you will find yourself in the predicament of a reduced standard of living."
Obviously, a man who worries about something like this is one women should avoid, no matter what his economic abilities are. He's not going to put the interests of family first. This is probably to be expected from an author who wants both a family and a harem; but selfishness at this level in a male bodes ill of his prospects as a good husband and father.
The second of George's points is that traditional women are too manipulative. The locus of George's complaint here is that traditional women are focused on building long-term relationships, a practice in which George sees as a way of entrapping men. He warns that if a man isn't on his guard, "before long she will have carefully navigated you towards a path that best suits her interests, but might not necessarily be in your interests."
Here the repackaged Feminism is very apparent. This is the attitude of a male who sees relationships only in terms of zero-sum competition and not win-win cooperation. Again, this the type of man whom women should avoid. There can be no trust in a relationship based on such premises.
George concludes with what he evidently considers the most critical problem: "traditional women don't age well." Although we all could likely think of contrary examples from Melania Trump onwards; there is a really phobia among denizens of the Manosphere against marrying women who might eventually grow older. Besides evincing extreme immaturity and unresolved Oedipus Complexes, the selfishness, narcissism, and dislike for women is evident.
In fact, selfishness is the underlying theme in the entire article. There's not a single consideration to the woman's hopes, interests, feelings, or desires expressed anywhere. And not only in this article, it's a recurrent theme at Return of Kings in general.
Don't be fooled by such hokum. There's nothing traditional about being a modern Casanova or building a modern-day harem as George claims to be doing. History is full of Casanovas and they rarely come to good ends. There's a good reason why one seldom meets a man of this type in his old age---and it's not because of younger women's tastes. The fact is that 'players' seldom reach advanced years in one piece. In contrast, the jails, skid-rows, mental hospitals, and cemeteries hold plenty of such characters.
The article was written by one Chris George, a Game/PUA advocate. Now PUA is nothing but Socialist/Feminist 'free love' rebranded as male empowerment. George admits as much claiming in his bio as "questing for the perfect balance between family life and building a modern-day harem." Naturally, traditional marriage or complementary relationships are anathema to both Feminists and Red Pills. Both are gender-supremacist movements and both gender equality and polarity are despised concepts between them.
George gives us three excuses men should use for avoiding traditional women. The first of these is that traditional women are too dependent. This is a rather strange position for a cult that is strongly opposed to even mild female independence. George explains that "If you can barely afford to have a good life on your own, when you start 'providing' you will find yourself in the predicament of a reduced standard of living."
Obviously, a man who worries about something like this is one women should avoid, no matter what his economic abilities are. He's not going to put the interests of family first. This is probably to be expected from an author who wants both a family and a harem; but selfishness at this level in a male bodes ill of his prospects as a good husband and father.
The second of George's points is that traditional women are too manipulative. The locus of George's complaint here is that traditional women are focused on building long-term relationships, a practice in which George sees as a way of entrapping men. He warns that if a man isn't on his guard, "before long she will have carefully navigated you towards a path that best suits her interests, but might not necessarily be in your interests."
Here the repackaged Feminism is very apparent. This is the attitude of a male who sees relationships only in terms of zero-sum competition and not win-win cooperation. Again, this the type of man whom women should avoid. There can be no trust in a relationship based on such premises.
George concludes with what he evidently considers the most critical problem: "traditional women don't age well." Although we all could likely think of contrary examples from Melania Trump onwards; there is a really phobia among denizens of the Manosphere against marrying women who might eventually grow older. Besides evincing extreme immaturity and unresolved Oedipus Complexes, the selfishness, narcissism, and dislike for women is evident.
In fact, selfishness is the underlying theme in the entire article. There's not a single consideration to the woman's hopes, interests, feelings, or desires expressed anywhere. And not only in this article, it's a recurrent theme at Return of Kings in general.
Don't be fooled by such hokum. There's nothing traditional about being a modern Casanova or building a modern-day harem as George claims to be doing. History is full of Casanovas and they rarely come to good ends. There's a good reason why one seldom meets a man of this type in his old age---and it's not because of younger women's tastes. The fact is that 'players' seldom reach advanced years in one piece. In contrast, the jails, skid-rows, mental hospitals, and cemeteries hold plenty of such characters.
CNN HOST JOINS IN VIOLENT ANTIFA RALLY
Among the Whacko Left-Wing, comedians are considered brilliant political philosophers. Stephen Colbert, Kathy Griffin, Sarah Silverman, Al Franken, and other multi-millionaires pose as advocates for the common man. Most of their 'comedy' is simply spewing insults and profanity: but the Left has never been known for its sense of humor.
One of these idiots is named W. Kamau Bell. Bell hosts a show on CNN; and despite his estimated $70 million net worth is constantly claiming himself a victim of racism. Recently he showed up a pre-riot rally in Berkeley.
"Today at the 'No Hate in the Bay' rally in Berkeley I was given a chance to speak. I wasn't expecting it. Before I knew it, I was holding the mic. As a comedian, you'd think I was already ready to grab the mic. But I'm not that kind of comedian."
Oh, sure. A national celebrity shows up in a crowd of losers and is 'surprised' that they ask him to speak.
"Berkeley shouldn't just come together when the KKK and Nazis show up!" Bell screamed through a bullhorn, "We should be like this every day! Everybody! Every Day!"
The Antifa then went forth and attacked a 'Patriot Prayer' rally after fighting with police. Bell, of course, discreetly kept his distance from those activities. Thus far, he hasn't denounced the Antifa violence at all. Nor has CNN spoken out against him.
But such is typical behavior for the leaders of the Left. While others make the sacrifices; people like Bell are rolling in money and appearing on TV. When they come to power, the Left governs exactly the same way. A handful of Elites live in luxury and splendor while the 'Proletariat' either does all the work or lives on whatever crumbs the oligarchs care to toss them.
Young men especially need to beware of such fakes, although the Left tends to radicalize a fair number of young women too. Action for its own sake accomplishes nothing except to make Bell and others like him rich.
One of these idiots is named W. Kamau Bell. Bell hosts a show on CNN; and despite his estimated $70 million net worth is constantly claiming himself a victim of racism. Recently he showed up a pre-riot rally in Berkeley.
"Today at the 'No Hate in the Bay' rally in Berkeley I was given a chance to speak. I wasn't expecting it. Before I knew it, I was holding the mic. As a comedian, you'd think I was already ready to grab the mic. But I'm not that kind of comedian."
Oh, sure. A national celebrity shows up in a crowd of losers and is 'surprised' that they ask him to speak.
"Berkeley shouldn't just come together when the KKK and Nazis show up!" Bell screamed through a bullhorn, "We should be like this every day! Everybody! Every Day!"
The Antifa then went forth and attacked a 'Patriot Prayer' rally after fighting with police. Bell, of course, discreetly kept his distance from those activities. Thus far, he hasn't denounced the Antifa violence at all. Nor has CNN spoken out against him.
But such is typical behavior for the leaders of the Left. While others make the sacrifices; people like Bell are rolling in money and appearing on TV. When they come to power, the Left governs exactly the same way. A handful of Elites live in luxury and splendor while the 'Proletariat' either does all the work or lives on whatever crumbs the oligarchs care to toss them.
Young men especially need to beware of such fakes, although the Left tends to radicalize a fair number of young women too. Action for its own sake accomplishes nothing except to make Bell and others like him rich.
Saturday, September 2, 2017
MAJOR DNC DONOR CAUGHT IN FBI STING
Attorney-General Jeff Sessions announced on Friday that Dr. Joseph Baptiste, a high-profile figure in Maryland politics, was arrested this week after soliciting bribes from FBI undercover agents posing as investors in a Haitian port development project. He is charged with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and multiple counts of Money Laundering.
"The Complaint alleges that Baptiste told the agents, in a recorded meeting in a Boston-area hotel, that he would funnel the payments to Haitian officials through a non-profit entity that he controlled---which is based in Maryland and purported to help impoverished residents of Haiti---in order to secure government approval of the project... In telephone calls intercepted by agents, Baptiste discussed bribing an aide to a senior Haitian official, offering him a job on the project. It further alleges that Baptiste ultimately used for personal purposes approximately $50,000 that he received from undercover agents for the payment of bribes to Haitian officials."
Baptiste is currently the Commissioner on the Governor's Commission on Caribbean Affairs for the State of Maryland, a position held since 2012. He was appointed by former Governor Martin O'Malley, a Democrat. A search of Open Secrets shows that Baptiste gave over 60 donations---most over $1,000---to the DNC, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and other Democratic Party politicians and causes.
The Clinton Foundation, as we know, has been under scrutiny for its own activities in Haiti; and Baptiste and the Clintons have a very cozy relationship. One of the organizations that Baptiste heads---The National Organization for the Advancement of Haitians--- is listed on the Clinton Foundation's website as a 'partner' in the shady Operation Hope Haiti.
Baptiste is also the founder of the Haitian Diaspora Federation. At a 2012 event, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent her chief-of-staff to speak there and offer federal assistance to the organization. He is also the head and founder of PromoCapital, SA---one of Haiti's largest investment banks.
So ends the career of a fairly significant denizen of the Deep State. Operators like Baptiste may not have been household names, but it is the energy and activities of such behind-the-scenes types who keep the Deep State going.
But this is one swamp-shark who's not coming back.
"The Complaint alleges that Baptiste told the agents, in a recorded meeting in a Boston-area hotel, that he would funnel the payments to Haitian officials through a non-profit entity that he controlled---which is based in Maryland and purported to help impoverished residents of Haiti---in order to secure government approval of the project... In telephone calls intercepted by agents, Baptiste discussed bribing an aide to a senior Haitian official, offering him a job on the project. It further alleges that Baptiste ultimately used for personal purposes approximately $50,000 that he received from undercover agents for the payment of bribes to Haitian officials."
Baptiste is currently the Commissioner on the Governor's Commission on Caribbean Affairs for the State of Maryland, a position held since 2012. He was appointed by former Governor Martin O'Malley, a Democrat. A search of Open Secrets shows that Baptiste gave over 60 donations---most over $1,000---to the DNC, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and other Democratic Party politicians and causes.
The Clinton Foundation, as we know, has been under scrutiny for its own activities in Haiti; and Baptiste and the Clintons have a very cozy relationship. One of the organizations that Baptiste heads---The National Organization for the Advancement of Haitians--- is listed on the Clinton Foundation's website as a 'partner' in the shady Operation Hope Haiti.
Baptiste is also the founder of the Haitian Diaspora Federation. At a 2012 event, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent her chief-of-staff to speak there and offer federal assistance to the organization. He is also the head and founder of PromoCapital, SA---one of Haiti's largest investment banks.
So ends the career of a fairly significant denizen of the Deep State. Operators like Baptiste may not have been household names, but it is the energy and activities of such behind-the-scenes types who keep the Deep State going.
But this is one swamp-shark who's not coming back.
Friday, September 1, 2017
RED PILL DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR
Christopher Cantwell, a Manospherean Red Pill cultist, gave an interview recently to his disciples from his present domicile in the Charlottesville Jail. Cantwell compared his current plight to Adolf Hitler's 1923 conviction for the Beer Hall Putsch. Cantwell is currently being held without bond for a violent attack on some Leftist protestors. Although he and the other Red Pills blame alleged police bias, Cantwell was arrested after bragging about the attack to the media and even posting videos of himself engaging in violence on the Internet.
The interview was conducted by his fellow Red Pill, Jason Kessler. Kessler is no stranger to the Charlottesville Jail himself. Like many in their movement, Kessler has a lengthy criminal record. His includes convictions for shoplifting, obstruction of justice, and numerous misdemeanors.
Kessler was formerly a Left-Wing extremist who was part of the Occupy Movement and was a known Obama supporter. He claims to have been red pilled (converted to the cult) in 2013. Today he's as much of a Right-Wing fanatic as he formerly was on the Left. Kessler was the ringleader of the whole Charlottesville Unite the Right debacle.
Besides playing the victim card, Cantwell urged his minions to engage in digging up dirt on his accusers and raising money for his legal defense fund. To that latter end, he and Kessler have enlisted the aid of another Manospherean, Augustus Invictus.
Invictus, whose real name is Austin Gillespie, is a lawyer by profession. He's a huge advocate of ethnic cleansing via a second civil war. Invictus claims to have been converted about a decade ago after the DEA raided a known pill-mill in which Invictus was employed.
"No comparable job existed for me and I was effectively rendered destitute." Invictus says of his Red Pill epiphany, "I swore vengeance on the DEA and vowed that I would return to college, go to law school, enter politics; and that one day I would shut their office down and put their families on the street."
Cantwell is a regular commenter on Manosphere blogs; Invictus once famously said that women ideally are "the prizes of a conquering hero." His wife divorced him allegedly after his Red Pill delusions led to domestic abuse. He's published several rather lurid poems filled with violent rape scenes and threats of vengeance on women who he believes have wronged him.
And these are specimens of men who hold themselves up as Alpha leaders and the vanguard of a renaissance of American masculinity. Be it known that traditional American men never behaved nor thought like these three. These three are punks; trying to recruit vulnerable men to their shady enterprises. Their pseudo-philosophizing is only a way to cover their characters.
Beware of such men. They are not great heroes leading some great revolution; they are thugs leading their followers on the road to ruin.
The interview was conducted by his fellow Red Pill, Jason Kessler. Kessler is no stranger to the Charlottesville Jail himself. Like many in their movement, Kessler has a lengthy criminal record. His includes convictions for shoplifting, obstruction of justice, and numerous misdemeanors.
Kessler was formerly a Left-Wing extremist who was part of the Occupy Movement and was a known Obama supporter. He claims to have been red pilled (converted to the cult) in 2013. Today he's as much of a Right-Wing fanatic as he formerly was on the Left. Kessler was the ringleader of the whole Charlottesville Unite the Right debacle.
Besides playing the victim card, Cantwell urged his minions to engage in digging up dirt on his accusers and raising money for his legal defense fund. To that latter end, he and Kessler have enlisted the aid of another Manospherean, Augustus Invictus.
Invictus, whose real name is Austin Gillespie, is a lawyer by profession. He's a huge advocate of ethnic cleansing via a second civil war. Invictus claims to have been converted about a decade ago after the DEA raided a known pill-mill in which Invictus was employed.
"No comparable job existed for me and I was effectively rendered destitute." Invictus says of his Red Pill epiphany, "I swore vengeance on the DEA and vowed that I would return to college, go to law school, enter politics; and that one day I would shut their office down and put their families on the street."
Cantwell is a regular commenter on Manosphere blogs; Invictus once famously said that women ideally are "the prizes of a conquering hero." His wife divorced him allegedly after his Red Pill delusions led to domestic abuse. He's published several rather lurid poems filled with violent rape scenes and threats of vengeance on women who he believes have wronged him.
And these are specimens of men who hold themselves up as Alpha leaders and the vanguard of a renaissance of American masculinity. Be it known that traditional American men never behaved nor thought like these three. These three are punks; trying to recruit vulnerable men to their shady enterprises. Their pseudo-philosophizing is only a way to cover their characters.
Beware of such men. They are not great heroes leading some great revolution; they are thugs leading their followers on the road to ruin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)