APEC, ABORTION, AND OTHER FUN STUFF

      In a sort of bizarre extension of yesterday's news stories, the US Congress---which is supposedly controlled by the Republicans---mercifully ended its session early after rubber-stamping the Junta's budget proposal. At least they won't they won't be creating any more national embarrassments until after Thanksgiving. No sooner had the Budget passed, though, than some rather awkward details about Pentagon and Homeland Security projects were quietly slipped under the Media radar-screen. 

    Biden, however, managed to make a fool of himself for the second time at the APEC Summit. There were, however, a few positive developments: China agreed to start answering the Defense Department's phone calls again, which they stopped doing after Pelosi's Taiwan visit last year. The Junta agreed to set up a joint commission to address China's concern about repeated US Military infractions of their territorial waters. It's difficult to say whether that one will amount to much: Trump ordered the Navy to stop these provocations at one time, but the Pentagon ignored him. There were some token agreements on climate change and fighting the drug war too; but Xi no doubt is planning a quiet week in the Chinese countryside to recover his strength after the mentally exhausting ordeal of meeting with US politicians, CEOs, and the streets of San Francisco in general. 

    

   Just as we predicted yesterday too, the Corporate shills RNC 'experts' were dropping their prepared statements accusing Biden of being a sellout and a major weenie on China. The stand-up team of Thayer and Fanell---a pair of worthies of whom we've spoken before---stated that our Head-of-State's gaffes and diplomatic blunders are "worse than appeasement." An assertion in their article's opening paragraph is more instructive than it is informative:

  "Ironically, the risks should be all on Xi’s side as his increasing paranoia and purging of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has warped the Party and government, coupled with the collapse of the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) economy and other major social, demographic problems that place Xi in a uniquely vulnerable position." 

   This is instructive because it illustrates two fundamental problems with the Neocon narrative in general.

   1. It's a complete lie. Xi is not paranoid; there no Party purges going on; China's economy is currently stronger than ours; and there is no demographic crisis going on there---other than those occasionally fomented by outside religious cults like the Soros-backed Wahhabi Jihadists and Lamaist Tibetans, or the Koch-backed Moonies and Falun Gong cults, etc.  

  2. It's complete Projection. Our leadership is the one characterized by paranoia, purges and political witch-hunts, a collapsing economy (at least for the bottom 80%), and deliberately engineered racial and gender divisions. 

 This is a fairly typical outline of what passes for 'Conservative Opposition' position-papers these days. Accuse everyone else of doing what we do; blame everything on the Democrats, immigrants, or the Chinese; hold your noses and vote for the Neocons; and if you object that makes you a defeatist, a sellout, an unrealistic idealist, etc. 

   

   The Congressional hiatus and the winding-down of the APEC debacle have, however, given the Republican Establishment time to promote its new-found wokeness on the Abortion issue. There was a good article at LifeSite News today giving a run-down of some of the characters involved. The only critique that I would have of this article is its assumption that leading Conservatives are 'sellouts.' The fact that no one in the GOP leadership has done a thing to stop the murder of the unborn since the Ford Administration, all the while profiting off fetal-tissue trafficking and other abortion-racket scams and doing very little since Roe was overturned, should indicate that the GOP's solid Pro-Life position was nothing but marketing angle and a sales-pitch all along. 

   The article starts with our President-In-Exile who is leading polls in a quixotic attempt to regain the White House. While I firmly believe that Trump was deposed in an illegal coup in 2020, I must confess that I have had legitimate concerns that our dispossessed Chief Executive has suffered some kind of nervous breakdown since the Putsch. Aside from his position on Abortion, Trump has refused to disavow the disastrous Operation Warp Speed and made some dangerous and really borderline-psychotic policy statements on more than one occasion recently. 

   Trump's remarks came in response to Ron DeSantis' allegedly hardline Pro-Life statements, although Ronnie-the-RINO himself hasn't been especially aggressive about outlawing the safe and legal procedure in his own state, Whacko Left histrionics to the contrary. 

   Kari Lake---who like DeSantis thrives on Publicity Stunts---and Neocon frauds Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter have shown their true colors as well. Though they weren't mentioned in the article, WEF Young Global Leaders and GOP presidential candidates Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy are taking the pro-life but not judgemental about personal choices approach. Ramaswamy hasn't made a detailed position yet, but his ties to Big Pharma and the Abortion Racketeers is self-explanatory. Chris Christie, like DeSantis, is generally fine with a so-called '15 week law' which still kills babies and keeps profits flowing to Big Pharma and the Biochemical Cartels, but can be sold as 'Pro-Life.' 

   Unfortunately, human life has become another commodity in the United States. Babies can't vote or donate to political lobbies while narcissistic women and opportunistic men can and do; so we know whose interests the Political Class is going to support. The Crown of Motherhood and the Miracle of Birth are not marketable concepts these days. If anyone doubts this, it would instructive to see a typical contract issued by any one of the major Insurance Cartels. There's plenty of coverage for Abortion Clinics---Fertility Clinics, not so much. Given the Cartels' influence in the Beltway, that's not liable to change any time soon.

   

DEPUTY AG PANUCCIO HUMILIATES ACADEMIC ELITE AT HARVARD

    Last Saturday afternoon, US Deputy Attorney-General Jesse Panuccio visited Harvard University to give a speech to the Law School's Alumni Symposium. His topic was the threats to Free Speech in American universities.  

     The full text of the speech can be read at the above link. It's a stark reminder of why we need swamp-draining in Academia; and how the Trump Administration is actively dealing with it. Throughout the address, Panuccio showed a courage and commitment to reform not seen from American politicians in years. The Deputy AG laid out the problem in bold relief---to the obvious embarrassment of academic elites whom he publicly shamed for their anti-democratic policies. He further encouraged students to stand up to Political Correctness on campus as well as reminding the Alumni---who fund a lot of Harvard's expenses---of their responsibilities in holding Administrators accountable. 

    Here is an example of what Panuccio said regarding the suppression of speech on campuses. "But that kind of teeming debate, that tradition of American dissent, is not what’s happening on college campuses today. As some Middlebury professors rightly declared in a Statement of Principles drafted after the violent events in 2017: “A protest that prevents campus speakers from communicating with their audience is a coercive act.” Hecklers are enforcing silence on others, so that only their own speech can be heard, and they are willing to use drastic means, including crimes of violence, to achieve this censorship.  

     "The heckler’s veto only succeeds when it is abetted by the echoing silence and inaction of those in a position to stop it.  By giving in to these tactics, administrators are creating a moral hazard that results in ever more suppression of speech.  If schools would impose serious consequences on hecklers, it is likely such tactics would abate." 

     How long have Americans waited for a government official to go to a major university and say that? Yes, many Conservatives have denounced these disgraceful 'protests'---but who has ever called out the Administrators for tacitly encouraging these demonstrations? They are really the ones responsible for these kinds of problems. And I think that most of us, including Panuccio and other DOJ officials, understand that the Administrations are often doing more behind the scenes than passive inaction. More often than not, they actively instigate these crimes. 

    Panuccio in fact says as much: "But few institutions have done so thus far—indeed, many administrators and professors seem afraid to take action that might expose them to criticism or protest from the mob. Maybe you’ve encountered that fear on your own campus.  Or maybe you’ve encountered something even worse: some faculty and administrators go beyond inaction and become part of the mob. Thus, while many universities pay lip service to free speech, they seem to be unable or unwilling to sustain an environment that actually inculcates and fosters respect for that principle. The more this kind of speech suppression happens without consequence for the perpetrators, the more it is encouraged, the more the behavior is repeated and normalized."

    Simple common sense should tell most of us that these demonstrations are rarely spontaneous movements of students. Let us reflect on our own school days. Most of us were thinking of our studies, the opposite sex, sports, and plans for the weekend (not necessarily in that order). Certainly, some joined political or social activist groups: but those organizations are required to have faculty advisers and be certified by the university. So, who actually incites these groups to crime ought to be obvious. 

     Panuccio goes on to lecture on the purpose of university; which he pointed out to the red-faced academics that they had long forgotten. One particular highlight from this segment was his insightful statement that: 

     "In place of the “spirit of free inquiry” highlighted by Justice Frankfurter, we now see a focus on feelings—that feelings, and not reason, should dictate what is said on campus and the obligations of members of the university community. The necessary implication is that any idea or speech that contradicts current majority beliefs or feelings is offensive, hurtful, and valueless—and can properly be silenced.  Outrage culture is replacing inquiry culture on our campuses...

     "Perhaps university administrators and faculty think they are doing their students a favor by prioritizing their immediate feelings, their short-term satisfaction, over their intellectual and emotional maturation. They are not. They are failing to teach their students how to think and thrive as adults in a complex and contentious society. The university is supposed to be where students are challenged, grapple with intellectual opponents’ arguments, and leave more informed. Instead, too many members of the next generation graduate believing that they can learn nothing from people with whom they disagree."

     Here Panuccio puts his finger on the inherent perniciousness of Cultural Marxism. The Radical Left---the ringleaders of Political Correctness on campuses---actually want to create a mass of NPC-types who obey and consider everyone questioning the official narrative as an enemy. Certain other students, who show the proper PC attitudes, are groomed for leadership roles. It works like a human pyramid-scheme. 

     But the days of the Left-Wing Academic Mandarins is headed to its demise. Panuccio offers this message of hope---which we should duly note and applaud:

    "For these reasons—because American society depends upon citizens who understand the value of free speech—the Department of Justice has been fighting for the First Amendment on American campuses. We are using the Department’s bully pulpit to raise awareness, and, as I have mentioned, we are getting involved in litigation against public universities that violate free speech rights. For publicly run institutions, upholding free speech rights is not an option, but an unshakable requirement of the First Amendment. Thus, to date, we have filed statements of interest in five lawsuits that seek to vindicate students’ free expression and free association rights. The lawsuits have been against University of California, Berkeley; Pierce College in Los Angeles;  Georgia Gwinnett College; the University of Michigan; and the University of Iowa.

   "We will continue to support plaintiffs in such cases and take action in future cases, and we want aggrieved students and faculty to know the Department is open for business on this issue. We welcome notifications about pending lawsuits and invitations to get involved." 

    As our previous Attorney-General, Jeff Sessions, used to say, we have your back. That's what we've needed for a long time: leadership that we can trust to do the right thing. It's only a matter of time before the Academic Mafia falls and the rats go scurrying back into the darkness where they belong.  

ERIN SITH, REBEL-GIRL, AND THE WORLDCON 76 FIASCO

    With Vox Day's media 'empire' in a state of free-fall, the gang at Castalia House and Arkhaven are resorting to all sorts of desperate publicity stunts to draw attention to themselves---since most of their work seems to be beneath anybody's notice. Marvel and DC Comics, for example, have about 70% of US market-share in comics and graphic novels; yet Vox seriously believes that they feel threatened by his miniscule output. Just the other day, he actually claimed that a panel from DC's Border Town comic somehow referred to himself; even though the character in question was a high-school student.

    He's seen other such 'attacks' in various places, too. Consistent with such paranoia, he and his henchmen have also been attacking imaginary enemies. The WorldCon76  meeting in San Jose yesterday was the site of a protest (of sorts) organized by Jon Del Arroz, one of Vox' pawns. As it happened, threats of Antifa counter-protests sent a yellow streak up Mr. Del Arroz' spine; and he did his best imitation of The Flash breaking speed records blowing out of town.

     The protest was therefore left to one Erin Sith: a Red Pill man turned via surgery into a Red Pill girl. The protest was a total flop, with a little over three dozen people attending. 

       An associate who attended WorldCon came up with an interesting theory. He noted that there was an uncanny resemblance between Erin Sith and Alt-Hero's poster-girl, Rebel. Both are tallish redheads; both have a habit of beating up men:

     Both carry the same kinds of rifles:

       There even appears to be a facial likeness---at least both have the same expression:

     Finally, I always thought that Rebel was a little buff in the neck, shoulders, and upper arms:

     
      Could it really be that Arkhaven's lead female character is modeled on a tranny? It wouldn't be surprising given the kinds of weirdness going on in today's Manosphere. 

  

ALPHA-BOY JON DEL ARROZ FLEES HIS OWN PROTEST

     Jon Del Arroz, crony of Vox Day and notorious internet gadfly, organized a rally at WorldCon 76 to protest getting banned from that organization in January. Del Arroz has been howling for the last several months that 'SJW's at WorldCon banned him for his politics, and not because he openly defied them to do it. 

     So, Saturday in San Jose, the Red Pills are scheduled to hold the Predators Out Now Patriots Rally Against Pedophiles in Sci-Fi demonstration. Yesterday, however, the Bay Area legions of Antifa announced that they would be holding a counter-protest. Manly Alpha Leader Del Arroz suddenly decided for 'health reasons' to make a beeline out of town:

     "Unfortunately due to family health reasons, I'll be unable to attend any further WorldCon-related events this weekend. I have to leave the area because of heavy smoke and poor air quality. Health takes a priority."  he noted at his blog. 

FYI:

   
    "The protest against pedophilia is still on," he continues, "And there's expected to be a sizable turnout. They have my full support..."

     Sure, Jon. Anyway, Del Arroz has assured us that the protest will be in the capable hands of one 'Erin Sith'---a trans-man who hangs around the Red Pill Movement and is known for rather unladylike behaviors like getting into fistfights with Antifa. He will be joined by the latent-homosexual gang, The Proud Boys. All of this motley group is ostensibly fighting for traditional values in American literature. 

     This isn't the first time that Del Arroz has hidden behind Mr. Sith's skirts. He recently noted on his blog that:

      "Erin has also very kindly offered to escort me to Bay Area Science Fiction conventions in the future for my safety's sake. Thanks, Erin!"

      What a pathetic excuse for a man. If you're planning to attend today's protest, that is the level of leadership you can expect. 

       It's doubtful anyway that Del Arroz' protests and tantrums will amount to anything anyway. He and Vox Day were totally wiped out in the first round of the Dragon Awards nominations recently. As those awards are reader-nominated, it's hard for either of those two to pretend that they're somehow being blacklisted by the industry.

      The Red Pills are fakes through and through. They don't represent any 'alternative' to anything. 

      

    


  

SAN FRANCISCO LITERALLY GOES DOWN THE SEWER

     The ultra-PC city of San Francisco is proving once again that Liberalism turns great cities and states into 3rd-world level garbage dumps. In one week alone, the City's 311 Complaint Line received over 16,000 public complaints about human excrement in the streets. That's almost 2,300 per day. I don't doubt that one bit. The city smells like a public restroom mixed with marijuana smoke. 

     It wasn't always this way. San Francisco used to be one of the best American cities. It went from this:

   To this:

   In one generation. According to Mohammed Nuru, San Francisco Public Works Director, the city already spends $30 million annually to clean the streets and city parks.

   The biggest problem in San Francisco today---and cities of the Pacific Northwest in general---is that the city leadership is in complete denial about the problem. Oh, certainly they'll admit that there are bums, drugs, and filth all over: but they deny that it's worse than any other city and/or that the problems are caused in any way whatsoever by their own policies. Just last month, San Francisco's City Council passed a ban on tobaccos containing flavorants. Swisher Sweets and Borkum Riff are great health-hazards, they reckoned---even though they probably stepped over a few dozen hopheads and piles of human dung to get to the Council Meeting.

     At a certain point, though, reality is going to have to set in. We've warned for a long time that these urban bum-jungles on the West Coast are a disaster waiting to happen. Think of this way: an illegal immigrant carrying some exotic disease---or a terrorist with a contagious biological weapon---can release a pandemic among the street population that could spread like wildfire through an entire city. Infected bums will probably run to other cities and set off a chain-reaction. 

      A scenario like that is a real possibility. Typhus, Bubonic Plague, Ebola, Diptheria and other epidemics were spread in the past by lack of sanitary conditions in urban areas. 

      But try and explain any of this to an average West Coast Liberal and you'll likely get met with a furious onslaught of outrage. They'd rather pretend that wading through piles of human waste and discarded is somehow all the Republicans' fault and turn their anger on us instead. 

      

THE SUMMER OF TDS TERROR

     Within hours of Trump's electoral victory in 2016, the far-out, whacko Left-Wing was already going berserk. That very night, idiots were flooding the streets of Berkeley and Portland, keeping residents and police up all night with their howling. It wasn't over: 240 people were arrested---including some public employees---at the Inauguration in January. We've been seeing it ever since: from violent riots to NFL protests to slatterns marching in vulgar pink hats, the Left has lost it collectively. 

      Ever since the Radical Left infiltrated the Democratic Party in 1968, they've always resorted to violence, sabotage, and subterfuge in their relentless quest for power; and been just as ruthless and unscrupulous when they've governed. It's not uncommon to see their violence in the aftermath of an election they've lost. But usually, they eventually settle down and begin scheming either for the next election or trying to concoct some Watergate-like scandal. 

      This time, things have been different. The hysteria of the Left over Trump's election has given way over time to something resembling complete insanity. Over the last few weeks, media scumbags have been threatening the Trump children and grandchildren with homosexual paedophilia. Leftist pundits are encouraging their followers to attack Trump supporters---their persons, properties, and businesses. Last weekend, a maniacal restaurateur kicked a Trump spokeswoman out her establishment for no reason. This insane act has led to calls for others in business to follow suit. Today, protesters mobbed US Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao McConnell, leading to a confrontation.

      And as if this weren't enough, a San Francisco-area degenerate named Andrew Gregor  posted this brilliant statement:

     Of course, the Trump Administration has expanded wildlife protection, cut taxes for the middle class and working poor, leased (not sold) public lands for oil companies, and never put babies in cages. And of course,  Gregor isn't exactly civil. He runs a rather shady 'green' contracting company and one Yelp reviewer claims actually to have caught him pilfering supplies after being kicked off a job he'd botched. According to Open Secrets, Gregor was a Sanders supporter. Despite supposedly running a profitable business, the cheapskate typically donated between $20-60 dollars to candidates. In November 2016, he tried unsuccessfully to raise $10,000 for an anti-Trump rally---apparently he doesn't oppose Trump enough to spend his own money doing it. A typical Liberal: he'll come with 'pliers and a blowtorch' as soon as he can appropriate them from somebody else. 

     Why are we seeing this fury from the Left today? The answer is twofold, with both reasons interconnected. The first is that the leaders on the Left have been stoking class hatred, envy, resentment, and identity politics for a long time. The second is that the Left is currently leaderless. The Leftist leaders could at least (or believed that they could) control and channel all of the hatred and rage they'd incited. When John Kerry lost in 2004, he told his supporters to wait out Bush and 'we'll get 'em next time'. Obama promised 'hope and change' and was able to accommodate and appease Leftist demands to a great extent. Even though Sanders supporters were often violent, the Senator himself disavowed violence and most of his media toadies, like Tom Hartmann, were aging hippies who saw in Sanders the realization of all their 60's love-in schmaltz. 

      But what we're seeing is a repeat of the scenarios of several movies, novels, and actual history. Movements built on perpetual outrage are not easy to control once they gain momentum. The French Revolution of 1789, the Russian Revolution of 1917, and the German Election of 1933 ended radically different than their organizers had planned: and in most cases recoiled on their leaders when people like the Jacobins, Bolsheviks, and Nazis found that they too could harness and direct mindless popular anger. 

     And that's what we're seeing with the Left today: mindless rage waiting for a Robespierre, Lenin, or Hitler to give it direction and purpose. 

      We've often said this about the Radical Right, but it pertains to the Far Left too: they're heading in a direction that easily could turn their paranoia into a self-fulfilling prophecy. The Left accuses Trump (falsely) of political repression. What better way to cause that repression to happen than go about targeting Conservatives for acts of violence? 

      Our Government is premised on settling political differences peacefully and enacting solutions to problems with debate and mutual compromise. When one side says it's through with civility and peace, there's going to be a reaction that's a lot more determined than pliers and blowtorches. Study our history and see how well any violent insurrection---from the Whiskey Rebellion to the L.A. Riots---have fared. The only place that people like Peter Fonda and Andrew Gregor will lead you is to the graveyard. 

      

     

     

REEFER MADNESS ON THE WEST COAST

     Today's announcement from the Trump Administration which rescinded the so-called 'Holder Memorandum' has caused near panic among West Coast Leftists. In 2013, former US Attorney-General Holder issued this dictum, which essentially ordered Federal authorities to refrain from taking legal action against marijuana use in states where it had been legalized. 

     Politicians like Washington Governor Jay Inslee---people to whom the pothead vote is important---went so far as to threaten Federal authorities with violence. "Any Federal Prosecutor who tries to enforce this won't be safe on the streets of Washington State." Inslee vowed. A sentiment not unlike his fellow-Democrat George Wallace once proposed about desegregation laws. Wallace had to be reminded, rather pointedly, that threatening federal officials is a serious offence; it wouldn't hurt Inslee to remember the same thing.

      But Leftist hysteria aside, today's decision was part of a comprehensive policy initiated a few months ago. Previous Administrations had fallen into the illegal practice of creating laws out of whole cloth simply by attaching them to Memorandums which were intended to be nothing more than policy guidelines. The Department of Justice under President Trump has stopped this practice and is in the process of repealing Memorandums which are contrary to law. 

      The 2013 Memorandum was one of these. The Federal Government still classifies marijuana as a controlled substance. Congress never passed any law repealing that classification. Holder had no authority to permit states to opt out of the law. Therefore, the Memorandum itself was illegal; and therefore states which have legalized marijuana have done so in violation of Federal Law. 

     That is the extent of the legal problem here. Either Congress or the Courts will have to intervene and either repeal the existing law or declare it unconstitutional if marijuana is to be made legal. Or conversely, uphold the existing law. But that's what should have been the first place, because it really boils down to legal conflicts. For example, marijuana producers in a legal state cannot comply with IRS guidelines because they are officially engaged in a criminal enterprise. Likewise, states are profiting off revenues withheld from other states. 

      The other legal issue is that a State cannot nullify a Federal Law. This was decided in 1832 when South Carolina refused to uphold the federal cotton tax. Holder really messed this up badly because he essentially granted states the authority to nullify laws---and selectively, at that. The states which legalized marijuana are in the position of enforcing an ex post facto law on the marijuana industry, which is also unconstitutional. The Obama Administration once again put everybody involved in a legal Catch-22. 

      The way to approach this is to sort it out through the courts and through legislation. Above all, heavy-handed measures like the anarchistic Inslee suggests should be avoided. From the Trump Administration's side, going back to Clinton-Era 'Drug War' tactics would also be counterproductive. What we need is a cohesive national policy. It's simply wrong that people in one part of the country can get stoned in Hookah Lounges while people in another part face mandatory minimum prison sentences for far less egregious actions. It can't be both ways. 

       Granted, it's not to tell hop-heads to be patient and think clearly. But clear heads and reason are what's needed here the most. 

NFL JUGHEAD JED YORK ON SOCIAL ISSUES

       The San Francisco 49ers, an NFL team which managed to go from producing national icons like Joe Montana to producing social dregs like Colin Kaepernick within a single generation, is reportedly donating a half-million dollars to gun control and anti-police activist groups. After the announcement, Jed York, the team's owner huffed indignantly to fake-news outlet ESPN that people were "painting him as a Leftist." 

       But it actually doesn't take too much paint. Open Secrets shows that York donated thousands during the last election to Hillary Clinton and to Democrat California Senator Kamala Harris. York himself is related to the DeBartolo family, who founded the team. He is one of several trust-fund babies who make up much of the NFL leadership in whom generations of inbreeding has taken its toll. He was appointed by his mother to head the 49ers in 2008. Sports Illustrated writer Michael Rosenberg wrote in 2014 that York's leadership "has created a culture which encourages selfishness, weakness, and back-stabbing" within the 49ers organization. 

      Needless to say, York is completely supportive of NFL players protesting President Trump and taken to social media to egg the protests on even further. It's not surprising either that York favors disarming citizens and disabling police. The 49ers have numerous players who've spent a lot of time in jail since York took over. Former San Francisco end Aldon Smith---the most frequently arrested player in NFL history---was also a 49er. Aside from Smith, 10 other San Francisco players have run afoul of the law since 2009. 

        Most recently, these crimes include assaulting a 70 year-old man and domestic violence. Others include DUI and drug offenses. In 2014, corner-back Chris Culliver ran over a cyclist while speeding and threatened a witness with brass knuckles. There's some real high quality folks with whom York associates. 

         It's hard to believe today, but once the San Francisco 49ers were the epitome of excellence. They had a reputation of being a tough, 'blue-collar' team who won games without a lot of grandstanding and celebrity hype. The aforementioned Joe Montana once scored five touchdowns in a single game despite having a broken rib-cage. 

        But that was then and this is now. Today the 49ers are the epitome of Trash Culture---just like the rest of the NFL. 

      

       

DRUG ADDICTION EPIDEMIC CRIPPLING CALIFORNIA

    The Leftist leadership in California have long been in denial about the severity of the narcotics epidemic in their state. The Northern part of the state has been particularly hard-hit. However, when President Trump recently allocated a $485 million program to fight this national problem, California was earmarked for almost 10% of the total budget. Two reports from Federal authorities illustrate why.

      The FDA issued a report this week on Opioid prescription abuse in California. Five counties in the north actually had more Opioid prescriptions than county residents. Fourteen others had per capita prescription rates higher than the State average.

      According to the Sacramento Bee, there were 1,925 Opioid overdose fatalities in California last year. Almost 15% of Californians are taking Opioid prescriptions, and the numbers are almost twice that in the most badly-affected counties.

      The CDC states that Opioids are the second-most abused narcotic in the US, with Marijuana in first place. Marijuana is legally cultivated in California, but there are illegal operations all over the state. The FBI estimates that 90% of illegal marijuana comes from California. Regulated Marijuana has strict quality-control standards; that sold on the Black Market is often adulterated with other narcotics, or contains toxic levels of pesticides, or both.

     In Northern California, drug pushers often take advantage of the vast state and national forests to conceal their operations. The EPA this week issued a report showing that water pollution in the region has reached critical levels. Local ranchers and farmers have reported livestock illnesses have increased from drinking contaminated water; and last month, two policemen and a police dog were hospitalized after coming in contact with a cesspool from an illegal Marijuana operation.

       Mourad Gabriel, who inspected raided operations with the EPA told reporters that the waters and grounds are saturated with chemical pesticides such as Carbofuran and Diazinol, Both are banned in the United States for food and tobacco crops, and banned completely by the European Union. If in ingested or inhaled through smoking, both can cause symptoms similar to botulism and death/coma in sufficient dosages.

      Gabriel noted that residuals in the ground are almost impossible to remove and may stay present in waters and soil for years before nature takes its course. Forest Service Rangers have pointed out that sportsmen who kill wild game face safety issues---not only from eating contaminated meat and fish, but because of the potential of encountering heavily-armed thugs in the deep woods.

      It's clear from these two reports that California has a serious problem; and the first step to solving it is acknowledging its existence. The State Government really cannot deny the problem any longer and they should start cooperating with the Trump Administration to resolve it. But instead, the State Attorney-General announced on Friday that he planned to sue the Administration over DACA; and anti-Trump riots broke out in the Bay Area and Sacramento once again. Given that these are two of the worst-hit cities by the narcotics epidemic, the motives for their opposition to Trump is self-evident.

CNN HOST JOINS IN VIOLENT ANTIFA RALLY

     Among the Whacko Left-Wing, comedians are considered brilliant political philosophers. Stephen Colbert, Kathy Griffin, Sarah Silverman, Al Franken, and other multi-millionaires pose as advocates for the common man. Most of their 'comedy' is simply spewing insults and profanity: but the Left has never been known for its sense of humor.

      One of these idiots is named W. Kamau Bell. Bell hosts a show on CNN; and despite his estimated $70 million net worth is constantly claiming himself a victim of racism. Recently he showed up a pre-riot rally in Berkeley.

      "Today at the 'No Hate in the Bay' rally in Berkeley I was given a chance to speak. I wasn't expecting it. Before I knew it, I was holding the mic. As a comedian, you'd think I was already ready to grab the mic. But I'm not that kind of comedian."

      Oh, sure. A national celebrity shows up in a crowd of losers and is 'surprised' that they ask him to speak.

       "Berkeley shouldn't just come together when the KKK and Nazis show up!" Bell screamed through a bullhorn, "We should be like this every day! Everybody! Every Day!"

        The Antifa then went forth and attacked a 'Patriot Prayer' rally after fighting with police. Bell, of course, discreetly kept his distance from those activities. Thus far, he hasn't denounced the Antifa violence at all. Nor has CNN spoken out against him.

         But such is typical behavior for the leaders of the Left. While others make the sacrifices; people like Bell are rolling in money and appearing on TV. When they come to power, the Left governs exactly the same way. A handful of Elites live in luxury and splendor while the 'Proletariat' either does all the work or lives on whatever crumbs the oligarchs care to toss them.

       Young men especially need to beware of such fakes, although the Left tends to radicalize a fair number of young women too. Action for its own sake accomplishes nothing except to make Bell and others like him rich.

WHAT TO DO ABOUT BERKELEY

     Berkeley, California is becoming a national problem. Yet another riot broke out in the city between political extremists. 13 people were arrested, joining 'Based Stickman' ---who was pre-emptively arrested on an outstanding warrant this week---in the local jail.

      To it's credit, the Berkeley Police actually seem to have taken some measures to prevent this riot---unlike previous outbursts. They had prohibitions against wearing masks and carrying weapons; which were ignored by Anarchists who stormed the police barricade. There were some serious injuries reported, though at this writing it is unknown how many.

      This is happening far too often in Berkeley; and there is really no excuse for it. It's no secret that most of these agitators are coming from out of town to disrupt and terrorize the residents living there. Berkeley used to be a nice town. It was formerly a rather quiet college town and the UC-Berkeley was part of a project to create a 'Western Ivy League'; along with Stanford, Cal Tech, and some others. But it's been many years since UCB has produced any alumni of any distinction; and the city has simply degenerated into an American version of Belfast or Beirut.

       It's going to take firm and strong measures to restore order in Berkeley, which neither Mayor Arreguin nor Governor Brown seems to have the will to do. This is not a partisan issue; but as President Trump said of Charlottesville, extremists at both ends are equally to blame. Nor is it a First Amendment issue. There's no Constitutional Right to commit violence in the name of 'free expression'.

       Title X, United States Code, Section 333 reads as follows:

      "The President, by using the militia, or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means; shall take such measures as he deems necessary to suppress in a State any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it

      " 1. so hinders the laws within that State and the Laws of the United States within that State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by Law; and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, or privilege, or immunity or fail to give protection. Or;

      "2. opposes or obstructs the execution of the Laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by Clause 1, the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution."

      Note well the bolded part of the law: it is very clear that the President has full authority to deploy the military in any part of the country involved in Civil Insurrection. This is what qualifies the City of Berkeley as a candidate for this type of action: because the course of an average citizen's ability to exercise his rights is continually being impeded by people who have no respect for law. The local authorities have shown that they are unable to control the situation.

      Should Trump take a bold step like this? The fact is, that he legally can. President Grant invoked this very statute to suppress the KKK in North Carolina; Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy used it to enforce desegregation laws; and President Bush Sr. used it to put down the Los Angeles Riots. And there are certainly parallels between these and the situation in Berkeley.

      Probably a good intermediate step would be for the President to impress upon the California authorities that, if they continue not protecting the residents of Berkeley, the Federal Government will be obliged to intervene.

      At any rate, something needs to be done. Mayor Arreguin did make an effort this time; hopefully he's getting the message. Federal intervention should always be a last resort; but the option is there, if needed.

CATHOLIC BISHOPS ADDRESS EPIDEMIC OF ALIENATED YOUTH

    There are some positive signs on the horizon that Conservative and Christians are finally beginning to address the growing problem of sociopolitical radicalization of Western youth. Shortly after the monumental decision by the Southern Baptist Convention to disavow the Red Pill/Alt-Right as an anti-Christian cult; the US Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a resolution for the upcoming Synod on Youth.

     The US Bishops agreed that the most important problem facing American youth is Alienation. Cardinal Tobin of the Newark Archdiocese stated that "the clearly increasing numbers of disconnected Millennials is certainly a concern for us, as is the decline and delay of traditional marriage among the young." 

      "Many young people are struggling with Racism prevalent in society," Bishop Soto added in a statement to the press, "They feel angry and disconnected from the political process. The Church needs to consider how to engage these disaffected youth who feel disowned by traditional institutions."

       Bishop Soto is from Sacramento and has no doubt witnessed the results of this alienation first-hand. North-Central California has been the scene of some of the most violent politically-motivated demonstrations executed by elements of both the Far Left and the Alt-Right. Last year in Sacramento, an riot over the 2016 Elections between Antifa and Nazi Skinheads resulted in seven people being stabbed on the steps of the State Capitol.

      Bishop Barron of Los Angeles---another hotbed of youth violence---stated that the Church's Message seemed 'opaque' to many youth, who are susceptible to the wiles of radical sophistry. The Bishop proposed a 'new apologetics' that connects the Truth of Faith with science as a way of clearing intellectual confusion. As we are all well aware, pseudoscience is a huge recruiting tool for radicals: Marxist socioeconomic theories and the Red Pill Movement being outstanding examples.

       "The Church cannot, nor does she wish to, abandon young people to the isolation and exclusion to which the world exposes them." Archbishop Chaput wrote. And again, as we've noted, radicals prey on those who feel isolated and excluded. The central issue therefore is to devise a way to appeal to youth by involving them in a greater purpose. Many of the Bishops noted that a hopeful sign among young people is a thirst for greater spiritual connection; particularly through what the Church terms, the Divine Mysteries.

        Dr. John Cavadini, a theology professor at Notre Dame, praised the Bishop's Resolution and offered that encouraging the young to reflect on the Sacraments and Mysteries bring them closer to Christ through cultivating spiritual discernment.

       "Meditating on the Mystery of the Church is not thinking about it as a charter or a constitution of some club. Rather, it is about meditating on the Wounds of Christ from which His Most Precious Blood flowed, which is the real birth of the Church. Meditating on one's dwelling within, or even near, the Wounds of Christ brings about an intimacy of Love to which one's only response can be thankfulness to God.

        "The one who loves the Church loves the Love Who had no contempt for anybody human, but did not spare Himself. He didn't back away from that solidarity, even when the penalty was death. Rather, He received the blow and so transfigured the whole of human solidarity from solidarity in sin to solidarity in His Love. The Church is the Sacrament of that solidarity in the world; a solidarity which the world cannot give itself, which does not come from the world, yet is for the world."

         Cavadini is correct; and therein lies the power of the Church---its ability to unite in love rather than divide in hate, as the extremists wish to do. The Left may sneer at the Church as 'an opiate' and the Right may sneer that the Church is 'cucked'; the fact is that neither can bring solidarity or contribute to human progress because their premises never rise higher than the immediate, material world. Consequently, neither does their morality; thus the extremists on both sides have to keep their followers embroiled in a perpetual state of anger and fear to motivate them. For example, one Red Pill blogger today proclaimed that the SBC resolution would "lead to dead Conservatives" while yesterday a Left-Wing blogger announced that Trump's policies "were tantamount to Genocide." It's obvious that people like these have no interest in peace.

         The Synod is scheduled for 2018 in Vatican City.

       

CALIFORNIA PROFESSOR JAILED FOR ANTIFA ATTACKS

    Eric Clanton, Professor of Philosophy at Diablo Valley College, was arrested in Oakland this morning and is being held on $200,000 bond for a series of attacks carried out during the Berkeley riots last April. According to police sources, Professor Clanton is charged with three counts of Assault with a Deadly Weapon and one count of Assault with Injury.

     Clanton was seen on video and social media as a masked Antifa thug wielding a home-made sap and hitting Trump supporters during the riot. The police say that Clanton was behind "several violent attacks" that left three people injured.

     If there ever was a poster-boy for draining the swamp that is American Academia, Professor Eric Clanton is him. Diablo Valley College takes tuition at $1200 a head (in-state) and rakes in millions in taxpayer largesse so that Anarchist thugs like Clanton can teach "Ethics, Critical Thinking, and Comparative Philosophy" and generate new radicals like himself.

       As for Diablo Valley College itself; Californians may well remember another scandal in which this institution of higher learning was involved. In 2007, the school was nearly shut down after 84 people there were arrested in connection with a grade-fixing scandal. Personnel inside the Admissions Office were caught altering transcripts in exchange for cash and sex. However, in spite of over 400 known false transcripts produced during a six-year period and 49 students and bureaucrats sent to jail, the Western Association of Schools and Colleges ruled that none of this was a sufficient level of corruption to cause DVC to lose accreditation.

      The question that should be being asked is: what purpose does an institution like DVC actually serve? Aside from a former congressman who graduated in the 1960s, DVC hasn't produced any alumni of any distinction in a field outside sports or celebrity venues.

      What we really need in the United States is a system for colleges and universities like the base-closure system in the military. There are a number of schools---like Diablo Valley College---that ought to be closed down for no other reason than that they are waste of taxpayer resources. The money wasted on a cesspool like this could be applied to much more deserving causes---and California has plenty such causes right now.

       As for Clanton himself, he is a product of UC-Bakersfield and San Francisco State: two other 'schools' that we might be better off without. Some Conservative activists claim that Clanton was also present during a 2016 Sacramento riot where seven people were stabbed.

         There's no hope for Making America Great Again without an educated public; and that will be impossible with scum like Clanton educating them. We need collectively to reform this system before it's too late.

       

RED PILL JUGHEADS INFILTRATE TRUMP RALLIES

     Vox Day, an American expat whose main occupation seems to be hiding behind a keyboard and inciting his followers to cause as many problems for American Conservatives as possible, had an article yesterday encouraging men to join extremist groups engaging in street violence at pro-Trump rallies.

      Many Conservatives have been drawn to the groups Vox praises, who allegedly appear at pro-Trump demonstrations to defend the constituency. Actually, these people are radicalized infiltrators who are there to commit violence (although the Antifa---who are just as radical---usually instigates it). The important point, though, is that these characters aren't there to support the President or his policies, but to draw attention to their extremist causes by creating a media circus.

      Kyle Chapman, a Red Pill 'masculinist' with a lengthy criminal record, is the commandant of a group called The Fraternal Order of Alt-Knights who is partnering with another gang, The Proud Boys, headed by foreign-born provocateur Gavin McInnes. They are appearing at pro-Trump rallies on a regular basis now and creating headlines---mostly negative ones that completely distract from the demonstrators' actual message.

      "Our emphasis will be on street activism, preparation, defense, and confrontation" Chapman boasted, "We will protect and defend our Right-Wing brethren when the police and government fail to do so. This organization is for those who possess the Warrior Spirit. The weak or timid need not apply."

       Chapman is known online in Red Pill circles as 'Based Stickman' and 'Alt Knight'. He is currently out of jail on six charges stemming from a confrontation in Berkeley last March. Chapman dindu nuffin' according to his defenders; and is being promoted as some kind of political prisoner---an image he cultivates. In reality, Chapman is no stranger to jail cells. In 1993, he was in prison for armed robbery; in 2001 he was convicted and imprisoned for Grand Larceny; and in 2008 for weapons charges---serious enough for a 63-month sentence.

        This is the guy Trump supporters want protecting them? Here's a tip: Demonstrators are free to hire their own security. They don't need---or should desire---street thugs of dubious ideology to assume the authority themselves. Especially not ones headed by career criminals and foreign agitators. And as we've often noted, most of The Red Pill Philosophy is rooted in sexual perversion and latent homosexuality. Terms like Based Stickman and Proud Boys are transparent indications of this group's inherent hatred of women, religion, and civilization which is grounded in their perverse attraction to 'Alpha' males. Certainly nobody you'd want around women or children.

         Like the case of Robert Fisher, Stickman is another clear-cut case of a Red Pill infiltrator of Conservative groups. Their goal has never been to work with Cuckservatives and Churchians as they call us. Their goal is to mainstream their radicalism. Vox Day, cited above, said the following in an article denouncing William F. Buckley as a corrupter of Conservatism:

        "I think that the old Conservatives would do well to call themselves 'Constitutionalists' because it's obvious that the current batch don't give a d--n about it. And neither do we of the Alt-Right, because it is obvious that the Constitution has not only failed, completely, by its own stated purpose but is being used to restrain the Right. The Alt-Right believes in only three things: Nationalism, Western Civilization, and Winning. Everything else is negotiable or a means to one of those three ends. We aren't Conservatives. We aren't philosophers. And we don't care about the Constitution, the Rights of Man, the Enlightenment, the Holocaust, or anything else with capital letters that gets in the way of our success." (June 9th, 2016).

         Vox' sentiments, and those of his fellow-parasites Chapman, McInnes, and Fisher are essentially the same. They are fanatics obsessed with destroying the existing social order and imposing upon us their warped interpretations of nationhood and civilization without regard to legal (Constitutional) or moral (Biblical) restraints.

        Conservatives should beware of being duped and expel these infiltrators from future demonstrations. And young men should beware: these fakes offering you fulfillment are wolves in sheep's clothing.

        

      

RED PILLS FIND A NEW 'ALPHA' HERO

    The Manosphere's Red Pill Cult didn't come away empty-handed from this weekend's annual Eastertide madness in the Prozac Nation. They found a new poster-boy for their ideology. His name is Nathan Damigo:

    Andrew Anglin, of The Daily Stormer, has even gone so far as to replace his usual 'Pepe' and Hitler-memes who a photo of this Manly Alpha Leader in action on his blog-header.

     For those of our many readers who've tuned out the Corporate Media: during the latest Berkeley riot, Damigo felt so frightened and threatened by a five-foot, one-inch teenaged groupie of the Bay Area Antifa that he knocked her out with one punch. And he didn't even use brass knuckles.

      So this photo and accompanying video went 'viral' and briefly eclipsed the looming Second Korean War on discussion forums as the most important thing on Ameroboobs' drug-soaked minds. The Red Pills, driven to orgasmic ecstasy at seeing a thug beating a girl half his size during Holy Week, cheered on and defended Damigo and ridiculed the girl-groupie---who probably really needed a good spanking and a two-week grounding more than anything else.

      Some photos of the girl have also emerged on the Internet, showing that sans the 60s-era Cuban-Revolutionary wardrobe, she's actually rather pretty.

     And this, as per usual, sent Anglin's notorious sexual jealousy into overdrive. He wrote a long diatribe explaining that female hypergamy is the reason young girls get involved with scum like the Antifa. The real reason, of course, is the cultural toxicity that social cesspools like Berkeley have on impressionable young minds---but Red Pill envy always overcomes their miniscule reasoning powers.

       Anglin pronounced Damigo's assault on the girl as "The Punch Heard Round the World!" and even called for "White Sharia". Yeah, he's really some Conservative...

        "The degree to which you allow women freedom is the degree to which they will destroy their own lives and the lives of everyone around them, and by extension, civilization itself!" Anglin shrieks, "We have to forcibly marry off teenaged girls to men who will take care of them!"

       And no doubt, in the Red Pill New World Order, the Manly Alpha Leaders like Anglin and Damigo will get first-dibs on all these girls forced into marriage. There's no point in deconstructing the rest of Anglin's foolish rant: he's basically advocating a female slave cartel where losers like himself can compete on unfair terms with more desirable males. It's the reductio ad absurdum of the Cultural Marxism upon which the Red Pill Philosophy is really based.

       It's not known as of this writing where Damigo is a Red Pill himself or not; but he fairly fits the profile of most of their kind. Besides a proclivity to beat up on little girls, Damigo is a chronically unemployed rootless male; a veteran both of Obama's Rainbow-Pride military and the State Prison. Yes, Damigo served a stretch for armed robbery, but he dindu nuffin'. At the trial he testified that it was all a mistake; he thought the cab driver he beat and robbed was an Iraqi. Oops...

      But Damigo and his actions in Berkeley are deeply symbolic of everything that is wrong with the New-Age, Trash-Culture Far Right. They are driven by an unwavering faith that Might Makes Right and that force, fear, and manipulation are superior forms of all human relationships. True Conservatives reject these things and stand for fair-play, defending the weak, and the Rule of Law. Conservatives are never afraid to fight; but do so as a last resort whenever peaceful options have failed. The Trash-Culture Right is all about the projection of power without the internal spiritual power tempering and guiding their actions. 

    Predictably, Anglin and the other smart boys laugh at principled Conservatives as 'Cucks' but it's their social and religious heresies which have never lasted while traditionalism always withstands the test of time.