THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL, PART III

      Elon Musk, CEO of X, Tesla, SpaceX, and the de facto CEO of the Republican Party, staged an interview last night with President-in-Exile Trump who is the figurehead candidate of the consortium of financial interests whom Musk also leads. As we might have expected, there was a lot of hype, but nothing of any actual substance beyond "the Democrats suck," and "trust us and we'll fix everything." Musk did float the idea of setting up a new bureaucracy (with himself as head) to oversee Government spending. 

   "Musk has called on Trump to set up a 'government efficiency commission' to ensure that taxpayer money is better spent, offering to help out with such a commission. Trump replied that Musk would be ideal for such a role." Certainly: what could go wrong with putting a government contractor in charge of policing spending? Just a suggestion, but maybe demanding that the federal agencies and congressional committees who already are supposed to be doing this actually start doing something might be a better solution.

   Trump also vaguely suggested closing down the Department of Education "and leaving it up to the States" whatever that means. The last Republican President who promised this gave us all the disastrous No Child Left Behind boondoggle and it seems somewhat doubtful that any further lack of oversight will stop criminal NGOs from plunging their tentacles even further into public education than they already do. Again, maybe demanding that the Department of Education do its job might be a better policy.

   The interview was delayed briefly by some sort of mysterious cyber-attack; both the Controlled Opposition and Mainstream Media seem uninterested in noting that the attack was launched simultaneously from NATO countries. 

   "XLab, one of the largest cyber-security companies in China, said that using its large-scale threat perception system promptly, it detected the recent attack targeting the X platform. Gong Yiming, head of the laboratory, said they observed that four Mirai botnet controllers were involved in this attack. Additionally, other attack groups also participated using reflection attacks, HTTP proxy attacks, and other methods. Monitoring data indicates that the four botnet controllers launched at least 34 waves of DDoS attacks. The four command servers were primarily located in the UK, Germany and Canada. The attack period coincides with the delay in the interview start time."

   Given the New Right's propensity for Publicity Stunts, I have my own suspicions about the origins of this incident; and it did seem to be corrected with remarkable speed considering all of the recent cost-cutting layoffs in Musk's far-flung financial empire. Despite all of this, the Punditocracy engaged in deep analysis of the interview and focused on the weighty issues of profound concern to all Americans with insightful well-reasoned discourse:

     In our last two articles, we've discussed how the 'New Right' in America---which is seemingly a loose confederation of disparate ideologies---is actually following an eclectic strain of Social Darwinism, Politico-Economic Determinism, Egoist Ethics, and New-Age Spiritual Gnosticism. The point where all of these ideologies connect is upon the central theme, which is expressed in the otherwise vacuousness of their central message. 

    This Central Message of the New Right turns on a variation of an age-old theme of an eternal struggle between the Children of Light and the Children of Darkness. In this New-Age version of the conflict, a debased version of Natural Law is substituted for the previously equally-perverted concept of a Divine Plan. Natural Law according to a Divine Plan is, of course, a real thing; but in the New Right's version, both are derivatives of the false philosophies alluded to above. The Children of Light in this scheme are the geniuses, the Alphas, the wealthy and powerful to whom either God or Nature (depending upon whether one is a Churchian or a Materialist adherent of the New Right) has given us all this outward stamp of approval. 

    That point of agreement is how so many groups who otherwise would be in opposition to each other are wholly involved in such a movement. We see Zionists working together with Racial Supremacists, and fundamentalist Christians aligned with Transhumanists, among many other examples. This is because the Utopia which they all seek is that of a Technocratic Elite built upon the supposed 'Natural Law' where personal worth is resolved into an exchange value. 

    By extension, the Children of Darkness is a mass of humanity---probably by far the majority of humanity---and are depicted as base, envious, treacherous, (as Vox Day terms them 'Gammas') and who are motivated solely by their greed for power and a desire to tear down the strong. Thus 'social justice' is seen as the Mark of the Beast, while ruthless exploitation and abject tyranny is seen as a Holy Mission. 

    It's hardly to be argued that the American Left really isn't made up of envious mediocrities who lust after things that producers acquire. The problem in our political discourse is that we've erected two---and only two---poles and declared that one must be on one side or the other. To use George Bush's infamous phrase, "you're with us or you're with the enemy." 

   In real life, however, the distance between God and Satan is infinite and human beings fall in varying degrees closer to one than the other; but the distance in our lifetimes measured against Eternity is quite narrow. If Salvation simply rested upon joining one faction or another then the whole idea of Redemption---which is expressed differently in all major religions---would make no sense. In the Christian tradition, the Pharisees and Sadducees of Christ's day had lost completely the concept of God's willingness and ability to save. The Pharisees' modern counterparts are the Churchians who believe themselves in possession of some special grace based on their personal merit; the Sadducees have their parallels in the Technocrats of the Dark Enlightenment who believe that religious ideals are ridiculous, but a useful tool nonetheless to keep the inferior masses under control. 

   If we wish to free ourselves today, we need to follow the example of the Founding Fathers, who were told by their contemporaries that one either had believe in the Divine Right of Kings or take the alternative of Atheistic Anarchy. Our Founders stopped and thought: maybe these guys are lying and there are other ways that we can free ourselves. We're being lied to again today: the Neo-Bolshevism of the Whacko Left and the Neo-Fascism of the New Right are not our only alternatives.  

THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL, PART II

     In our last article, we discussed how the 'New Right' is a re-packaged version of the New Left, premised largely on the mythos that what Americans really want are authoritarian leaders who favor degenerate interest groups while virtue-signalling behind Hollywood and Madison Avenue caricatures of our shared values. The results speak for themselves: the Republican wing of the Uniparty has been sinking in the polls since Kamala's coronation. In reality, what people in Western Cultures really want are governments that defend our shared values while leaving the populace in peace and freedom---as our Declaration of Independence says that Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness are inalienable Rights. In Europe---where the Right really are Conservatives, they win support and accomplish positive things, unlike their American counterparts who say one thing and do another. 

    As we also pointed out---despite the various labels that supporters of the New Right apply to themselves---an underlying philosophy directs the whole movement. This is evident from the recent experiences of Kyle Rittenhouse and Joe Rogan who discovered in short order that thinking for oneself has consequences. Some of us have observed too a growing phenomenon of troll armies and brigading going on whenever anyone questions the Official Counter-Narrative. 

    The fundamental philosophy behind the New Right is exemplified by the public faces operating as its spokespersons. We've mentioned people like Andrew Tate, Steve Sailer, Vox Day and others like them who sell their message to many Americans who have been alienated and marginalized by the extremism and fanaticism of the Left. What they actually offer, though, is the same thing that the Left does---the only difference being that they promise to alienate and marginalize other groups while wielding unaccountable power themselves. They make an especial fetish out of the idealization of success (as they superficially define it) and above all, the glorification of power. 

    Not surprisingly, a philosophy like this elevates Narcissism and unrestrained selfishness into part of their Moral Code. One of the New Right's slogans is Facts Don't Care About Your Feelings; the implication here being that the Alpha Leader is one who makes tough, reality-based decisions because it is the right thing to do. The idea has gained a lot of support because---like much of their philosophy---it contains a grain of truth. The Left over the last few decades has made a fetish of their own about Virtue-Signalling and phony 'compassion' as well as engaging in hypersensitive, almost infantile, social policing over anything and everything anyone might conceive of as offensive. 

   However, the New Right has quite a loaded definition of what 'facts' and 'feelings' actually are. Facts, as they define them, are rooted in ideals of Social Darwinism and Evolutionary Psychology; i.e. that the will of the strongest is what constitutes Reality. Their definition of feelings encompasses actual virtues with emotional components like love, empathy, compassion, mercy, proportional justice, fair play and many other things that have actual moral justification. The Alpha archetype that their converts are taught to become isn't such a glorious figure which it reaches its final fruition: but that is carefully kept out of sight.

     Disillusioned and alienated men see the ostentatious lifestyles of these influencers, the personality cults around 'based' politicians, and the fat bank accounts of Corporate Robber Barons and think, "I'd like to be like that." Being rich, popular, and having a large female fan-base is certainly not a bad thing on its own and a lot of us wish we had those things and it's perfectly normal to desire them. It's a well-established fact that part of Masculine Psychology is a striving for significance and the respect of his fellow-men. However, the New Right uses this tendency in men as a weaponized form of propaganda---much in the same way that advertisers sell brands of cologne, cars, etc. 

    The component of Masculine Psychology that one abandons by taking the Red Pill, however, are the positive coefficients of the tendencies listed above. Nature has implanted in men a striving for significance not for the purpose of self-aggrandizement, but for the purpose of being better providers for a family and being defenders of the community. In other words, the principle implies strength through service. In the Old Testament story of the Garden of Eden the first commandment given to Adam was to "maintain the Garden and defend it." The Churchian acceptance of the New Right's perversions of masculinity are derived from neo-Gnostic philosophies rooted in Mediaeval superstitions just as the secular component comes from neo-Scientism. 

   Where the targeted audience of these propagandists err is confounding their natural desire to be like the Alphas without understanding that the system is rigged so that one actually has to be what these Alphas really are. The higher one rises in their status-driven hierarchies is in inverse proportion to the deterioration of their characters---which is logical when one's ethical code boils down to the hypocrisy of professing virtue while practicing vice. The resulting personal instability which characterizes nearly everyone who---both currently and historically---put this theory into practice exhibits is a exemplary lesson of where these ideals lead. The rapacity of their own lust for status which knows no accountability to God or Man invariably drives such people on to the most amoral ruthlessness. Historically, the Third Reich with its 'Fuehrer Principle' was the reductio ad absurdum of this philosophy in policy. The 'Alpha Leaders' were driven to commit the most hideous crimes against humanity to please the whims ultimately embedded in the twisted mind of a single madman. It's hardly surprising that so many Neo-Nazis are drawn into the New Right.

       On a more interpersonal level, consider that to be like a character like Andrew Tate means having the ethics of a pimp in relation to women, the ethics of a slave-master in relation to those considered 'inferior' and a willingness to exploit and fleece innocent men seeking status in the world for personal gain. That's the price that Tate and people like him pay for being an 'Alpha.' In the broader political sense, to be an actual power-player in the economic or political hierarchy one has to be willing to firebomb school buildings or drive women and children into rivers to drown or to bankrupt entire communities to have all of these fat bank accounts and high poll numbers. It seems like a high price to pay for being based and Red-Pilled.

     This is why it is essential for the propagandists of the New Right to focus on the superficial elements and power while keeping the seamier side of the Alpha Lifestyle prudently out of sight. This dovetails into the whole strategy of the Republican Campaign this year: focus on the extremism of the Left without explaining exactly what they intend to do once they achieve power. That's what we need to be thinking about if we really intend to Make America Great Again. 

     

   

   

THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL

       The main news this week is, of course, that Biden's hand-picked successor leading the transition to the Great Reset has chosen (or had chosen for her) a running-mate. The Controlled Opposition Media was right on top of things: christening the new duo as Cackling Kamala and Tampon Tim. It's so gratifying to see that the Conservative Movement is following in the footsteps of William F. Buckley and winning in Marketplace of Ideas with elevated discourse and well-reasoned positions. 

    As a side note, Tim Walz actually does have a few minor issues in his past; e.g. being a thuggish tyrant throughout the whole Scamdemic, instigating the BLM riots, rigging the Kangaroo Court that framed Derrick Chauvin and three other policemen as scapegoats for George Floyd's death, and pushing an abortion law that is by definition infanticide. However, the Republicans discreetly are choosing not to bring up these peccadilloes and many other crimes that Walz is guilty of committing---since that would put them in the awkward position of having to defend their own Party's complicity in all of them. 

     President Trump seems to be slowly coming to the realization that he's really only a figurehead and he seems to be running out of steam judging by his recent social media posts; but this week, Trump really hit the bottom of the barrel, doing an interview on Adin Ross' podcast. For those unfamiliar with Adin Ross, he is a Manosphere vlogger and probably the most abject sycophant of Andrew Tate.  Depressingly, Trump claimed that the younger men in his family were fans of Tate and Ross. 😔

    The above video clip can't help but convey the state of the Trump Campaign; we'll leave the readers to their own impressions on that. What's far more troubling is that these types of punks are growing increasingly influential on the New Right. In 2016, under the neologism of the Alternative Right, a loose collection of Manosphere activists and other unsavory characters tried (unsuccessfully) to shoehorn themselves into the MAGA Movement. A little-known fact is that this group did win several converts among Silicon Valley Technofascists and Megachurch fanatics whom since 2020 have pumped money into Public Relations and political donations to beef up their presence and polish their image. J.D. Vance, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Elon Musk are three high-level examples of the foothold they've gained.

    The ideology promoted by Tate and Ross---and really they are the celebrity 'influencers' of a deeper philosophical strain---is an admixture of 19th Century Social Darwinism, 20th Century Evolutionary Psychology, and a revival of Ancient Gnosticism camouflaged with 21st Century Techno-Utopianism. It is characterized by contempt for democracy, contempt for women, and complete amorality in the pursuit of personal power. Power is what disciples of these theories hold to be the highest good of the individual man, although only a select few are destined to obtain it.

   To believe this theory one would have to believe that millions of years of Evolution---from lemurs to apes to Mankind---reaches its final state of perfection in Andrew Tate, or Vox Day, or Rollo Tomassi. It likewise requires one to believe that Elon Musk, or Peter Theil, or Vivek Ramaswamy---by virtue of their fat bank accounts--- are the final culminations of virtue and wisdom from the Ancient Greeks to the present day. Finally, through various secret revelations known only to initiates who've taken the Red Pill, a select few of now-alienated young men can rise to the status of such characters and be part of the New Order. Anyone outside of this chosen people are written off as envious losers, 'gammas' and really only fit, at best, to be used as chattel for the Supermen. The old Masters of Mankind once pretended to derive their authority from the Gods, the New Breed is content to derive it from monkeys. 

   Now there is no shortage of wits in the Punditocracy who believe that monkey-men are exactly what we need. Make no mistake about this: anybody who has read any of the scholarly studies of the last century on the social and sexual organization of primate communities can see at a glance that all of this nonsense promoted by the likes of Andrew Tate is based on no higher civilized level than that of the ape. We can also see at a glance that this becomes a positive danger to Civilization when it translates into social policy.

   What is the appeal of the New Right? True, a number of Americans today are alienated from a system that no longer functions for the benefit of any but the few. However, it would seem paradoxical that an ideology proposing the rule of the few should gain any credence with so many. Part of the problem lies in that much of what the New Right advocates or opposes has enough of a grain of truth to give it plausibility. The Whacko Left has marginalized ideals like faith, family, liberty, and traditions so that the superficial appeal posing as an alternative draws people into the New Right's web of lies. However, when one digs very far below the surface, what we see is all of the negative stereotypes and caricatures of Conservatives elevated into a Standard of Value. 

   The examples of this are numerous. Feminists portray traditional families as evil patriarchies dominated by brutal unaccountable fathers---the New Right holds this up as an ideal household arrangement. Socialists portray all businessmen as greedy exploitative swine---the New Right tells us that is an attitude that successful men must emulate. If the Left tells us that masculinity is toxic and abusive towards women, then men must embrace such tactics and employ them enthusiastically. The Left lampoons Conservatives as moral hypocrites, so the New Right tells us that being a hypocrite is only being a smart operator who knows how to game the system. So on and so forth. The worst part of it is that criticizing any of these positions gets one accused of 'siding with the Left,' as if these were the only two alternatives.

   The 'New Right;' the 'Alt-Right;' the 'Dark Enlightenment;' the RedPills; Christian Nationalists---whatever these people call themselves, they are not Conservatives. They are the Reactionary Left in reality, and we need to repudiate them as foes of free men, not embrace them as allies. 

   

   

    

   

THE AMERICAN FAT FARM

     Here in the Prozac Nation, a new study published in the Journal of American Medicine revealed yet another of the growing health issues facing America's youth. Obesity rates among the 12-18 age group have now hit an alarming 21% of that demographic. One would assume that this and several other reports of high addiction, suicide rates, infant mortality, and infertility would be a major topic of discussion over here, but apparently only the Chinese Media thought it worthy of mention. Their editors also stated the obvious: "Treatment strategies vary, but lifestyle modification remains the cornerstone. Effective interventions include dietary changes, increased physical activity, and behavioral counseling." Ultimately, parents have the responsibility for the physical and mental health of children and legal minors; however pointing out parental failures is probably not an ideal way to flatter the public for votes during an Election Year. 

    It should be noted that in the clinical sense that JAMA is using the term, obesity is not the same as overweight. Heaven only knows how many fall into the latter category, which is also unhealthy. Evidently the situation has gotten so bad since I studied any medical science that the World Health Organization has had to add new categories for hyper-obesity.

        The Public Schools and politically-correct politicians likewise have failed our youth in this respect. In the early 1960s, now-Dead White Males led by President John F. Kennedy mandated a program in the school system to ensure the health of future generations, which included health education in addition to actual physical training. The program was abandoned by Neocon George Bush Sr. who saw it as a waste of money and later by the Clinton Co-Presidency who thought it wasn't inclusive enough. There have been a few half-hearted attempts to promote public health in schools, most notably under Obama; but these were mostly publicity stunts and there has been no political focus on the problem since the 2010s and no real policy on the subject since the 1980s. 

      JAMA is, of course, published by the American Medical Association which has deep ties to both Big Pharma and to the Insurance Cartels; so naturally their proposals call for more top-down solutions and expensive medical procedures instead of good parenting and better education. Wall Street is never one to let a good crisis go waste when there is an opportunity to enhance stakeholder profits.

    Likewise, there appears to be no popular will to address the problem either, considering how so-called Fat Acceptance has become a New Normal in American standards of beauty. Like Gender Dysphoria and Drug Addiction, most Americans seem to imagine that pretending there are no health risks will make the problem go away by ignoring or denying it. 

    However, Reality does have a bad habit of making itself felt whether people ignore it or not. Four-fifths of Americans aged 18-24 are unfit for military service, even by the Pentagon's abysmally low standards. Infertility rates are causing a decline in future work forces which will have to support an increasingly aging population. What's worse: the associated health problems with morbid obesity is putting a strain on the very generation that will need to provide for its elders.

   It's also quite apparent that our failures in public education are contributing to our decline as a world leader in innovation and technology. As we've noted many times before, it's simple mathematical logic that what is a social problem in the 2020s is going to be a national disaster in the 2040s. 

   Sadly, the average Ameroboob's concept of the future is something like next weekend; and thus the next decade or so is as remote to their thinking as the 25th Century. So likely we'll continue sinking into bulimia and addiction while Big Pharma, Big Ag, the Insurance Cartels, and the Academic Mafia going laughing all the way to the bank.

     

 

    

FORKED TONGUES AND BIG PHARMA

       The Controlled Opposition isn't doing so well these days. Politico, a Deep State mouthpiece owned by German WEF Media consortium Axel Springer, reported that the GOP's sudden turn to the Woke Left has not only cost it votes but has seen a massive drifting away both of coveted Wall Street robber barons and the Israel Lobby. In July alone, the Harris Campaign raised over a quarter billion dollars---nearly three times that of their Republican counterparts. To make matters worse for Conservatism Incorporated, this cash is coming from the very so-called 'venture capitalists' they'd hoped to win over at the expense of their Conservative base. 

     Democratic Party dark-money operative Steve Spinner said that "the formation of the group was intended to push back to the narrative that Silicon Valley is now split in light of far-right billionaires like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen and David Sacks publicly supporting Trump. It’s still very, very much Democratic country out here, and now it’s Harris country. Just because there are a couple of big name, big ego investors that are for Trump—they do not speak for the broader tech community and the broader VC community out here. For every one person who’s backing Trump, there are twenty who are backing Kamala.” Slimy Silicon Valley corporate lawyer Andrew Byrnes added: "After Biden dropped out, several well-known tech lawyers in the Valley signed up to bundle donations for the Harris campaign."

     After Biden withdrew from the DNC nomination, the Republicans suddenly found themselves with no substantive issues on which to build a base of support. Aside from trying to scrounge the gutters for sexual 'scandals' they can accuse Kamala of committing and various Lawfare proposals, they've thrown out a few campaign promises here and there desperately trying to win back the supporters whom they've alienated for the past year. President Trump was in Georgia today and caused a round of excitement in the Controlled Opposition Press by promising to stand up to Big Pharma.

    “Big Pharma, they’re a villain in many different ways. I know them better than anybody. They weren’t fans of mine. In fact, when they announced the vaccine, they did it one day before the election. That’s okay with me. They weren’t fans of mine. I got them to do things that nobody thought anybody could get, really, to do. And, no, they are — they’ve done some good things. They’ve done some very bad things also. There’s no question about it.”

    I'm not certain how Trump plans to crack down on Big Pharma with characters like Doug Burgum and Vivek Ramaswamy in a potential Cabinet---not to mention all of the 'Conservative' legislators with their fingers in Big Pharma's pie. 

  Even the Moonie-connected media outlet Newsweek noted that Trump has never apologized for Operation Warp Speed and was still bragging about it less than two years ago. Likewise, Georgia seems like a rather awkward venue for such a statement. Trump today denounced Governor Brian Kemp saying, “Your governor Kemp and Raffensperger, they are doing everything possible to make 2024 difficult for Republicans to win. Kemp is very bad for the Republican Party. He’s the most disloyal guy I think I’ve ever seen...Kemp is bad guy. A disloyal guy." 

    Trump's original feud with Kemp began in 2020 when Kemp broke ranks with the White House and rejected Scamdemic Mandates. Republican bumbling has turned Georgia from a reliable Red State to one where Kamala has overtaken Trump in the polls; and a State where only two years ago the Democrats won a Senate seat with a lackluster candidate who would have been beaten handily by a competent opponent.   

    As long as the Party Establishment insists on pretending that we can win with Neoconservatism, the losses are likely to continue. Promises like those made today are not going to be the magic bullet that the Punditocracy hopes for because they have no credibility. Meanwhile, both parties will point fingers and accuse each other while the moneyed titans on Wall Street laugh in their sleeves at the whole show. 

   

    

    

    

    

CAN ANYBODY JUSTIFY THIS?

        This weekend we've seen a flurry of 'news' stories purporting to be about the upcoming election. Supporters of the Republican Party tirelessly have been expounding for the last year or so the need to depose the Democratic Administration. I do agree that the Democrats and the Whacko Left Wing generally needs to be ejected from positions of authority. However, I advocate doing this by the people standing up and re-asserting their Constitutional (and Natural) Rights of self-government. 

      The problem with this position is that the current supporters of the Republican Party can't seem to come up with an actual plan for achieving this. In fact, the longer that this Campaign has gone on, it has become increasingly apparent that we're not looking at Trump 2.0 as much as Bush 3.0; the same forsaking of principles and appeals to the lowest common social denominator, the overt Authoritarianism and top-down solutions---nobody seems to be able to explain why the 'alternative' is better than the current situation. 

     Take for example, some of the revolting stories emerging out of Controlled Opposition echo-chambers. Mark Levin, a stupid blowhard who has a well-financed echo-chamber of his own, accused Kamala Harris of being a virulent anti-Semite. This is despite the fact that Kamala is married to a lawyer for the Israel Lobby and currently heads the White House Task Force on Anti-Semitism---which incidentally he co-founded with Trump's participation. There have also been numerous lurid 'allegations' of 'sexual misconduct' against Kamala---all gutter-level innuendo that we'd expect from the Democrats; but again, it's only bad when the Democrats do it. 

     But more troubling than this, we saw on Friday influencer Kyle Rittenhouse withdraw his support from Trump---probably largely because opposition to Gun Control was another issue conspicuously absent from July's Woke Convention. Rittenhouse has apparently changed his mind---or, by the sound of things, had it changed for him. 

     Productive conversations indeed. In light of Thursday's remarks on the demise of Project 2025, the RNC seems to be taking a much more aggressive stance to curb dissent. This also goes for that great advocate of free speech, Elon Musk:

    Then there was this, allegedly from Trump (or whoever writes for him):

       So: purges, censorship, and productive conversations with Party strongmen. Does anybody still not see a problem with any of this? Exactly how does anybody imagine that these people are going to govern the country should they come back into power? We've been given a fair taste of it already, with some of the thuggery of Republican Governors and Congress passing laws seizing media outlets, expanding surveillance programs and openly praising WEF gangsters like Javier Milei and Benjamin Netanyahu.

    Is that what we want in the United States? It's time that Conservatives started asking some questions and getting some answers. 

WHEN DO WE STOP LOOKING THE OTHER WAY?

        Yesterday, a statement from the Trump Campaign (or whoever writes his speeches for him these days) caused a little minor controversy after the issue of Project 2025 resurfaced.

        Admittedly, there is much about Project 2025 that any sane candidate should disavow; and certainly we have no especial feelings for the shady Heritage Foundation or the Deep State shills running that organization responsible for its production. What was troubling about the RNC statement was the second paragraph with its not-so-veiled threats of consequences for those who violate the Conservativism Incorporated's "zero-tolerance policy on a focused and disciplined campaign strategy." Statements like these hearken back once again to the Bush Machine policy of treating everyone outside the Party orthodoxy as an enemy. 

     The Party Machine hypocritically slammed the Heritage Foundation for influence peddling: as though the Silicon Valley Tech Lords and the Bush Family bankers funding the RNC are wholly disinterested patriots coming together for the common good of the nation and that Trump doesn't change his policies to suit them in any way. 

    Such things might sound like typical Election Year posturing, but they take a more ominous aspect when pundits start promoting the idea that things won't end well for dissenters from the Party Line. Witness another piece written by an operative from another crooked NGO yesterday equating 'America's Enemies' with actual Americans who don't show sufficient loyalty to the New Order.

   After the obligatory half-dozen paragraphs of Historical Revisionism and snide innuendoes against the Democrats, the author states: "We must make as many public examples (nota bene) of the Marxist, Islamist, and anarchist infiltrators of our government and our institutions as possible. Not simply for their beliefs, of course," he very discreetly adds, "but because they have declared us the enemy and have set about undermining everything that holds our nation together. They’ve brought along an alarming number of Americans (nota bene) into the anti-American and anti-West movement.

   "If we can uncover and prosecute America’s foes, we may be able to slow the cancer enough to excise it. So, while Donald Trump is not the perfect vessel for implementing conservative policy (nota bene), he must rise to the occasion in a second term and dedicate his entire administration to investigating and prosecuting (nota bene) those who would do our nation harm. It’s a huge task, and it will be divisive at first, but our nation cries out for it. We cannot go on like this, tolerating deliberate societal suicide. Eventually, conducting these investigations will have the effect of bringing about a renewed sense of patriotism and shared values (nota bene). We might consider it a new Cold War (nota bene). Defeat the enemies first. That’s our only current priority."

    Rise! Rise! The ghosts of George Bush and Dick Cheney! Because that is exactly what we're reading here: declaring another 'national emergency' requiring the sacrifice of more of our liberties for the 'national security' reasons of 'saving us' from some very ill-defined 'enemies.' The author throws out a few very fluid examples of such enemies: 'Marxists, Islamists, and Anarchists' but as we've seen those definitions seem to cover anybody opposed to the Reactionaries' new Victim Classes---i.e. Wall Street Robber Barons and the Zionist Lobby. 

    Regarding this latter class of victims, the President-in-Exile also made some remarks today fretting that Kamala is too much of a weenie defending Israeli interests; just as the news broke that those heroic allies in our shared Judeo-Christian Heritage are embroiled in a controversy over whether their brave xhes in uniform have license to commit rapes (of either gender, apparently). 

     I suppose that this is to be expected from a Party holding up the likes of Steve Sailer, Andrew Tate, Vox Day, and Doug Wilson as masculine role models. However, we should be asking ourselves a pointed question: At what point do we become worse than the Left? How long are we going to look the other way at these kinds of things?

    So far, few want to answer those questions, let alone ask them. As things stand right now, I don't see that a Republican replacement for the Biden/Harris Junta would actually equate a positive change. Anyone looking at things objectively could even make the argument that we're being offered is actually worse. The Democrats at least are trying to keep up the pretenses that their drive to the Great Reset has to go through the processes of our system: the Reactionaries seem to be determined to take a shortcut, bypass all of these procedures and go on to the New World Order as quickly and as efficiently as possible. 

    If we recall the recent GOP Convention, not only was Social Converatism excluded, but so were concepts like balancing the budget, restraining the police state, draining the Swamp, protecting property rights, and safeguarding the Constitutional Rights of the public. When we see things like the Republicans in Congress gifting the Biden/Harris Junta with further censorship powers--- like they did again just this week---and a campaign stressing zero tolerance which is heavily run by representatives of the Dark Enlightenment, Log Cabin Republicans, Silicon Valley transhumanists, and Christian-Zionist fanatics; I think that questioning the direction that they might be taking us is a legitimate concern. It's time that we stopped looking the other way and started asking some of these questions.