Harvard University, which was once among the luminaries of global academic excellence, has fallen to the gutter-level of street agitators by offering a new four-week 'symposium' beginning today. Resistance School is the actual name of this course, which is offered online. The course's 'syllabus' reads: "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty."
According to Sputnik News, 'lecturers' include former White House staffers, Harvard Public Policy professors, and community organizers. Course work is about teaching activism tactics "for as long as President Donald Trump is in office."
Maybe it's time that the Trump Administration decided to eliminate any federal funding to Harvard, cancelling any and all government contracts with that institution. If these scum want to resist the government, let them pay for it themselves.
An interesting proposal being floated in some corners of the Internet would be for the government to suspend federal funds for the Academic Establishment and channel the money into grants to set up actually socially useful colleges: medicine, technology, science, research and development, etc. That way, qualified students could attend state-of-the-art learning centers while bypassing several years of classroom time---now simply wasted parroting politically-correct propaganda---that serves no purpose except to inflate some professor's already bloated ego and justify their excessive salaries.
In contrast to this, the Israeli media reported that researchers at Tel Aviv University have discovered a potential cancer-treatment that has the medical world taking note. By modifying naturally-occurring proteins, Israeli scientists have discovered through laboratory tests that the modified proteins attack cancerous cells as they begin to reproduce---while bypassing healthy biological cells. If successful, this treatment can be used to fight cancer without any of the destructive side-effects of most current treatments. The Israeli Government is considering permitting clinical trials.
So while Israeli universities are on the brink of a cancer cure, Ameroboob students are taking Prozac and marching around in disgusting pink hats. The real grassroots that need reformed are in our educational system, because America can't be made great again if the swamp grows back after it's been drained.
With substance abuse, epidemic obesity, and high divorce rates running rife among modern American women, our current First Lady is a refreshing reminder of true femininity. MAWGA (Make American Women Great Again) is a growing informal movement inspired by Mrs. Trump's beauty and dignity to restore American womanhood to the pinnacle it once enjoyed.
So this week, Mrs. Trump released her official White House portrait. It was, of course, promptly pooh-poohed by jealous left-wing amazons and Male Feminists. Looking through history, though, the US has produced a number of glamorous First Ladies. Which should indicate to those in the Manosphere that things weren't always as they are now.
MELANIA TRUMP:
NANCY REAGAN:
JACQUELINE KENNEDY:
BESS TRUMAN:
GRACE COOLIDGE:
HELEN TAFT:
EDITH ROOSEVELT:
IDA M'KINLEY:
FRANCES CLEVELAND:
ELLEN ARTHUR:
LUCY HAYES:
MARY LINCOLN:
DOLLY MADISON:
MARTHA WASHINGTON:
Does it seem as though there's a correlation between being a Conservative leader and having an attractive wife? No wonder Liberals are in a continual state of jealousy and always trying to normalize non-traditional relationships.
At any rate, these ladies of the past (and now present) put the pink-hat-wearing, foul-mouthed, gender-fluid female 'role-models' of today to shame.
The Red Pill Cult, which poses as the true defender of Christian manhood, routinely launches attacks on traditional Christians. They claim that contemporary Christianity is weak and effeminate; and they alone preach and teach the truth.
Sfcton, a neo-Confederate and another Red Pill convert extracted from the modern military, has written an article titled I'm Starting to Think Christianity is a Death Cult for Whites. His argument is the fairly standard anti-Church propaganda prevalent in the Manosphere: "We are in a literal war for our survival. All tribes always are at all times, yet Whites---especially the church-going sort, do basically nothing...I look around for church-going men to respect. Hard men, strong in their faith, willing to do the hard things, but all I see are cucks...Right now I can't think of too many men more useless during this current round of ugliness than churched men."
Ton cites the exploits of ancient Hebrew warlords, whom he describes as "Hard men, zealous to kill the Lord's enemies, to take the other guys' land so that their tribe can grow and prosper...Eager for war against outsiders as an act of worship..." And to this novel interpretation of Old Testament history, he adds "Christ came not to bring peace but a sword."
Well, the Apocalypse of St. John depicts Christ with a sword that comes from His mouth, signifying the power of God's Word. And some men---real men of the Church---employ this sword in that way.
For example, Catholic News Agency reported recently the story of Bishop Salvador Rangel, head of Mexico's Chilpancingo Diocese. As we know, northern Mexico is in the grips of a battle between the Mexican Government and vicious drug cartels whom many believe are supported by the US 'Deep State'. Many of these cartels are headed by members of Satanic cults and have terrorized Christians and even killed priests.
Bishop Rangel, through intermediaries, arranged a meeting with the leaders of the Guerrero State gang-leaders. "When I saw that priests were being threatened by them, I took upon myself the task of going to see the gang-leaders and talking to them." the Bishop told CNA.
Now, does this sound like the actions of an effete coward? To walk boldly into the camp of the Church's avowed enemies and open dialogue with them?
"As a Bishop, I must seek dialogue and peace." the Bishop informed the gang-leaders, "By killing priests, we will accomplish nothing and the situation in Guerrero can only deteriorate."
The Bishop's mission had some effect, because threats against priests and churches have dropped off considerably since the meeting. The Bishop was also contacted by Mexican authorities, but informed them that "I am doing my pastoral work. I'm a bishop, not a prosecutor. I'm a simple instrument of dialogue, of reaching out because it's not my obligation to bring people in or to report on them. If they have opened up and been sincere with me, it is my duty to be loyal to them."
Bishop Rangel, however, indicated that he was willing to act as an intermediary between the government and the gangs to bring peace to Guerrero.
In Guerrero, the only people who are "eager to wage war as an act of worship" are the devil-worshipping commanders of drug cartels. And the real men of faith, "the church-going sort who do nothing" are calling out their evil deeds and liberating their people.
Cults can only thrive in atmosphere of fear and ignorance, which is why they are defeated by the faithful every time. "Perfect love casts out fear" as the Apostle John also teaches. And likewise St. Paul, who taught us that the shedding of Christ's Blood forever negated the shedding of blood as an act of worship. Once again, the Red Pills prove themselves to be preaching the doctrines of demons, while the Church leadership proves itself virile and strong.
Today there was sad news from Russia after thugs attacked the St. Petersburg Metro will shrapnel-bombs; killing 11 people and wounding more than 50 others. President Putin undauntedly went to the scene of the attack where he led a prayer service for the victims; and met with security officials. For his part, President Trump phoned Putin to offer his condolences and American support.
"Donald Trump expressed his deep condolences to the families of the victims killed during the barbaric act carried out in the St. Petersburg Metro, and Trump asked to convey words of support to the Russian people." Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. And Trump was not alone: leaders of France, India, Germany, Turkey, China and elsewhere offered support.
That is, everyone except for the American Corporate Media, which has a history of gloating over Russian deaths. The Moonie-owned Washington Times was forced to retract misleading photos connecting today's bombings with some recent protests in Moscow. John Podhoretz, one of the Beltway-Wall Street Establishment writers opined that "Interesting that the bomb blasts would come so soon after the protests; giving Putin a cover for a crackdown." Podhoretz has probably complicit in enough fake news to believe things like this. More likely, though, he's just saying what he's paid to say.
Garry Kasparov, who leads the Soros-supported Human Rights Foundation and works a pundit on CNN, told that fake-news outlet that "'Unknown terrorists' perfectly timed to suit Putin's political agenda...please don't confuse sympathy for the victims with sympathy for the Putin Regime."
Louise Mensch, an executive at News Corp, also pounced on the story. News Corp, of course, is owned by an Australian national and heavily funded by state-sponsors of Wahhabi terrorist movements. According to Julian Assange, News Corp was the 6th largest media donor to the Clinton Foundation.
Mensch herself was a Clinton supporter in 2016 and called for Obama to block Trump's Inauguration pending investigation into supposed Russian interference in the election. More recently she was better-known for promoting the conspiracy theory that Putin had Andrew Breitbart murdered as part of a plot to promote Steve Bannon to power---as if Trump couldn't afford to buy his own media outlets if he so chose. Mensch has a long history of drug addiction and mental problems but in today's Corporate Media climate, those debilities don't disqualify anyone from being an expert on anything.
"Putin has no compunction about killing Russians to serve his own ends." she pronounced. "Take absolutely nothing that the Kremlin says about this or any other terrorist incident at face value."
Actually we should stop taking anything that the American Corporate Media says at face value. This is the same Media who for the last several years have assured us that mass-murders like the San Bernardino, Orlando, and Ft. Hood cases had no connection to Jihadi movements. Instead, we should support Putin and Russia who've been the real leaders fighting against terrorism and political corruption and a force promoting freedom throughout the world.
Prosecutors in Atlanta have jailed Brian Eleby, who is alleged to have deliberately set the fire that destroyed an overpass on I-85. No one was injured, and the damage extent has not been calculated, but the Trump Administration has released $10 million in Federal Emergency Funds to the State of Georgia for repairs.
According to police reports, Eleby and two other scum were smoking crack-cocaine under the overpass when Eleby went berserk and started the blaze. Eleby has an extensive criminal record---almost all of which are drug-related offenses.
The case has generated some Corporate Media attention and become something of a cause celebre among Left-Wing activists. Eleby is said to be 'homeless'---a term that seems to elicit a magical spell of presumed innocence here in the Prozac Nation. This is in spite of the fact that the overwhelming majority of this class are addicts, fugitive criminals, registered sex offenders, and long-term mentally ill who are responsible for numerous---and often violent---crimes. Additionally, the 'homeless' are often responsible for introducing infectious diseases and parasites into whole communities and causing pollution of various kinds. And arguably even worse: this group ties up scarce resources within the Social Safety Net that should go to the deserving poor.
The Left is typically in denial about the state of 'homelessness' because to acknowledge the reality would be to admit failure of their policies. Since the 1990s, the Left's approach to welfare has been heavily focused on spending and services and treatment given a low priority. The general philosophy behind such an approach is that the State has no right to interfere in so-called lifestyle choices. The result has been that the US has about an equal number of displaced persons in 2017 as it had during the early years of the Great Depression. The Roosevelt Administration set up a system under which the displaced were re-integrated back into productive society; this policy was abandoned under the Clintons.
It's interesting to compare rehabilitation-based models to the standard system. Provo, Utah---ranked by some as the most Conservative major city---uses a rehabilitation-based approach. Provo has state-of-the-art shelters and services which are rarely needed and the city has practically no 'homeless' problem. Contrast that with the Liberal cities of the West Coast where the 'homeless' are like a plague of locusts. European countries---maligned as 'socialist' here typically use a rehabilitation-based approach as well. Though it adds to the welfare budget, this approach has been demonstrated to be much more cost-effective both in short-term help to the poor and long-term effects on society.
People like Brian Eleby should never have been loose on the streets to begin with. It's not compassionate to let people like this to rot to death of cocaine addictions under freeway overpasses; and it's even less rational when they cause millions of dollars in damage. That Eleby's actions caused no deaths was "a miracle" according to the Atlanta Fire Chief. The number of people murdered by the 'homeless' every year though, weren't quite as fortunate.
The Trump Administration has yet to enact any sweeping welfare reform, but the recent Task Force set up to confront the epidemic of narcotic addictions indicates that the Administration's focus will tend towards rehabilitation and reintegration. It's certainly not a sign of social progress when American cities look like 1970s Bangladesh. Our current approach has failed miserably, it's time for a new and better approach.
As we predicted here earlier, the case of accused murderer and Red Pill Cultist James Jackson is not going away. David Futrelle, a male feminist writer has also picked up on the connection between Jackson and the Red Pills. He published an article recently about the convergence between the Radical Right and the Men's Right Movement.
Overall, Futrelle's article was very good; far more objective than one would expect. The article is mostly descriptive, apparently aimed at audiences unfamiliar with the Red Pill Cult and its MGTOW partisans in particular. Most of Manosphere leaders whom Jackson followed were of the MGTOW persuasion.
"The two movements are drawn together by a shared obsession with, and paranoia about, the sexuality of women." Futrelle writes, "It seems fairly clear that the relative values of sperm and eggs have little to do with {White Supremacists'} reactions. Black men dating White women trigger sexual insecurities...MGTOWs are similarly obsessed with women having sex with men other than themselves. While MRA complaints often reek of sexual insecurities and resentments and aggrieved sexual entitlement, MGTOWs seem motivated by little other than their own sexual anxieties and resentments."
Futrelle comes very close to the truth here; so close in fact that he drew down upon himself a torrent of abuse from outraged Red Pills. While what Futrelle says is observationally true, he misses the actual cause of this convergence.
The problem with Leftist pundits in general is that they are taught to view everything through the lens of Marxist thought. Marxism also relies heavily on Evolutionary Psychology and sees history and sociology in terms of class-struggle. To their minds, women and minorities were intentional victims of exploitation and are evolving towards a future of equality. Thus, racists and misogynists of today are political reactionaries or ignoramuses who still hold outdated beliefs.
What the Left fails to see is that the Far Right is not the opposite of Cultural Marxism; but the counterfeit of it. The mythology of a racist, misogynist past promoted by the Cultural Marxists is fully accepted by the Far Right. The Far Left is trying to escape a past that never existed and the Far Right wants to 'return' to the same place. This is where the convergence-point between Neo-Nazis and the Red Pills actually lies.
Feminism teaches that women were formerly the property of men---something that hasn't existed outside of a few fringe movements and the economic aristocracy in Western Civilization since prehistoric times (if even then). The Red Pills and Neo-Nazis are together in the belief that this supposedly oppressive Patriarchy was a Golden Age that men should aspire to return to. The idea that women should be the de facto slaves of men is a dominant theme among the Red Pills---and that White women should be the property of White men is dominant among the Neo-Nazis. Add into the mix the similarity between the Red Pill Alpha and the Neo-Nazi Ubermensch and the convergence is complete.
To sum up, Futrelle's psychological reasoning is basically correct, but his sociological premises are badly flawed. Nonetheless, his article isn't bad for those wanting a basic introductory explanation of this unsettling social trend. Psychologists like Erich Fromm proved during the 1940s that there was a direct correlation between Naziism and sexual perversion; like Fromm, Futrelle is correct in noting this, but the Socialist leanings of both writers cause them to miss the bigger picture.
The bigger picture is that there is equality in traditional gender polarity and gender roles because Civilization is built on the twin foundations of Community and Family. The traditional province of one is masculine, the other feminine. Eroding these boundaries lead to sexual anarchism---and the James Jackson Case is ultimately the product of that. He, like Nazis and Red Pills in general, would have been a fringe element under a traditional society; but in an anarchistic one feels empowered and entitled to take drastic action against imaginary foes. Such men would never be viable competitors for females in a traditional culture---hence they long for a system of sexual slavery where they can rule by fraud and force and feel cheated that society denies them this 'right'.
This is why Conservatives need to stand up and denounce these movements. President Trump, Vice-President Pence, and Interior Secretary Zinke have all spoken publically against these Neo-Nazi groups. Unfortunately, GOP activists haven't followed the Administration's lead.
While the Ameroboob Media has busy for the last few days snooping around for dirt on Jared and Ivanka, the Chinese have been focusing on the first meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi at the former's Mar-a-Lago Estate this week. Xi made the announcement that he will be in Florida on Thursday following a state visit to Finland.
Most Chinese are favorably disposed to Trump; mostly because they despised Obama. China has a great respect for Trump because of his business acumen.
"Trump has a transactional view of international relations, unlike his predecesors" analyst Ngeow Chow Bing told Xinhua News, "Trump is by nature more likely to accept China's proposal for a relationship featuring non-conflict, non-confrontation, mutual respect, and win-win cooperation. I think Trump will realize that a fundamentally stable and productive US-China relationship is in the interests of Washington."
These sentiments have been echoed by Rex Tillerson himself; and this upcoming meeting in Mar-a-Lago may represent a genuine turning-point in US policy in the Pacific. Few Americans realize---thanks to Corporate Media obfuscation---just what an unmitigated disaster Obama's Asian Pivot really was. If China had been stronger militarily and better prepared, we may have lost our influence in the Pacific Rim altogether. The mistake that China made was underestimating how badly Obama would bungle US Foreign Policy; and they can't be blamed for that. Obama left a power-vacuum too big even for China to fill alone; and Xi is prudent enough to see that Sino-US power-sharing in the Pacific is beneficial to both countries.
For his part, President Trump said on Thursday, that he anticipated meeting Xi for the first time; and stated that the Korean Peninsula, trade issues, and counter-terrorism and fighting international crime would be on the table for discussion. Notably absent are Obama's ridiculous demands about the South China Sea, the Uighars, or Chinese military developments.
Very likely, though, given the interests and temperament of both presidents, trade policy will be the main focus of the first meeting. Trump has sought to correct the massive trade-deficit the US has with China and China desires greater access to American investment.
The one thing that cannot be denied is that Liberal/Neocon policy with China has been a complete failure and that a new course is desperately needed.
