Readers will remember that only about a year ago, one of the 'non-dangerous' street bums of Portland, Oregon---a self-proclaimed White Nationalist---killed two men and permanently injured a third who interfered with his attempt to attack a pair of young women. The Red Pills in the so-called Manosphere made fools of themselves defending the thug as a hero and portraying the victims as deluded chumps.
So Vox Day, one of the cult's ringleaders and a White Nationalist himself, recently praised two effete Britons who ran away from a similar incident.
"Why should they be ashamed?" Vox spouts, "They did nothing to be ashamed of. She wasn't their daughter, wife, or mother. They had no obligation to risk being injured or even having the polish of her shoes scuffed for her. She's lucky that they didn't simply sit there and laugh at her."
Now Vox claims that the Red Pill Cult represents true Christianity. He probably should reflect on what Jesus did when the Pharisees were about to stone a woman to death. But continues putting his foot in his mouth:
"Women have spent the last 50 years telling men that everything is their fault and that they are both unneeded and unwanted. Women broke the socio-sexual contract, which is why many White men quite reasonably feel absolutely no duty to look out for women, children, or anyone else to whom they feel no direct responsibility."
Granted---in the Red Pills' case anyway---elevating cowardice to a virtue is making a virtue of necessity. But let's take two hypothetical situations to illustrate why Vox' position is detrimental in the social sense:
#1: An anti-male woman is attacked by Chad and Tyrone in a dark alley at night. Chuck Norris is passing by, sees the struggle and puts the two thugs to sleep on the sidewalk.
#2: An anti-male woman is attacked by Chad and Tyrone in a dark alley at night. Vox Day is passing by, sees the struggle and runs down the street screaming until he reaches a 'safe space.'
Which of these two scenarios would likely change Ms. Bigot's mind about the necessity of men in her life? And which of the two would reinforce her 'all-men-are-pigs' attitude?
This is what Jesus meant when he spoke of 'turning the other cheek'. The man who risks his life to save others---even when he knows the others despise him---is behaving in a Christ-like fashion. On the Cross, Jesus even prayed of those who crucified Him: "Forgive them, Father, for they know not what they do." It is said that Barabbas, in whose place Christ was crucified, repented at the Foot of the Cross and joined the Apostles.
This brings to mind a story I vividly remember from childhood: an old gentleman in the rural area where I grew up was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and a racialist church. One night while jacklight-hunting in a marshy area, he fell into quicksand. His two companions ran away, but two Black hunters coming from the other direction heard the commotion and came to investigate. By the time the Blacks arrived, they could only see an arm rising up out of the pit. One tied a rope around his waist and dove into the quicksand. With both men submerged; he took the old man by the waist while his companion pulled on the rope, bringing them both out of the mire. Had the rope broken or slipped, there would have been two casualties that night. When the old man recovered, he thanked his rescuers and broke off with the Klan and his racist church. By behaving with Christ-like self-sacrifice, the Black men exposed the old man's hypocritical faux-Christianity, and he repented and became a better man.
The first commandment which God gives us in the Bible is wherein he says to Adam, "Maintain the Garden and defend it." (Genesis ii: 15). This was before Eve was created; hence it is a commandment specifically addressing the duties of the males of our race.
Once again, the teachings of the Red Pills stand at variance with teachings of Christ and the Church. They would be better served spending more time learning what Christianity actually teaches than the self-serving sophistries of their self-appointed leaders.
It's been awhile since we had a major swamp-draining story, but today the FBI netted an especially nasty denizen of the deep-state. It was none other than a 30-year veteran staffer of the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, James Wolfe.
Late last year, Attorney-General Sessions vowed to stop unauthorized press leaks---which our irresponsible media was broadcasting and usually distorting. The Big Nothing-Burger of alleged Trump campaign collusion with Russia is being investigated by the Senate and Wolfe was leaking evidence to the Corporate Media.
"Wolfe is alleged to have lied to FBI agents in December 2017 about his repeated contacts with three reporters, including his use of encrypted messaging applications. Wolfe is further alleged to have made false statements to the FBI about providing two reporters with non-public information about matters occurring before the SSCI." said the Attorney-General in today's press-release.
Wolfe held the position of Director of Security for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. He had access to highly classified material provided to the US Senate from the Executive Branch, including the White House, CIA, Homeland Security, NSA, and the Pentagon.
On Thursday evening, fake-news outlet The New York Times confessed that one of their reporters, Ali Watkins, had her home raided and records seized in February by the FBI in connection with the investigation. She was also found to have been trading sexual favors to Wolfe in exchange for classified material. It's rather interesting that a publication like the Times---which has been hyping up the whole '#MeToo' chicanery---should condone such practices. But we are talking here about the sleazy culture infesting the whole Corporate Media.
What's even worse is that Ali Watkins purposely reported misleading information in covering the SSCI Leaks story. In one Twitter post, she opined that "The SSCI read is that Trumpster lawyers will leak info about upcoming appearances, blame the Senators, and use the leak as an excuse not to cooperate." (September 19th, 2017).
She also has worked for Politico and Buzzfeed. The former of these has been repeating cornball conspiracy theories recently about Mrs. Trump's current public seclusion following surgery. The latter was the originator of the infamous 'Golden Shower Scandal' hoax. This is the state of the US Media in 2018.
At least Wolfe is one less swamp-rat that the country has to worry about. And congratulations to the FBI on another job well done.
In the aftermath of the California Primaries, we were hoping for better news. Thanks to a form of Democrat political protectionism, the Republicans aren't even going to be represented in the 2018 Senate race. We predicted they'd have a reasonable chance, but... this is the West Coast.
California and Washington State both have rigged Primary Election laws whereby the top two candidates advance to the General Election; regardless of party. Thus, if you have a Democrat who's able to scrape up enough votes (or commit enough fraud) to finish second overall, the top GOP candidate is eliminated.
That's what happened to James Bradley, the leading GOP contender at the polls. Spread among all the candidates, the GOP got around 34% of the vote. Incumbent Democrat Diane Feinstein got 43%. This could have been a close race under fairer voting rules. But the vote was split up among GOP candidates, enabling radical Leftist Democrat Kevin de Leon to squeak by into second place.
The system was largely at fault here, but the California GOP should have anticipated the problem and coalesced behind one candidate. But Bradley and Erin Cruz were both polling about twice as high than the number of votes they actually received; while two other GOP candidates who barely registered on the polls somehow managed to get 12% between the two of them. California has an Open Primary system, and it's not unknown that Democrats will organize 'spoiler votes'.
However Election Night was not a total loss for us in the Golden State. Republican gubernatorial candidate John Cox scored a surprisingly strong 27% and second-place finish. His Democrat opponent, the repugnant Gavin Newsom, finished first with 33%. So we still have a decent shot at Sacramento as a Consolation Prize. It would be more of a symbolic win, though, since the chances of a GOP takeover of the State Assembly are not especially good; and Cox himself is really much more Libertarian than Conservative.
The media hyenas are trying to spin the Primary results as some great renunciation of Trump and his policies. Remember though that Hillary Clinton won this state by a 2-1 margin. Democrats winning a heavily Democrat state is hardly a bellwether of national trends. If Conservatives can make a stronger showing in 2018 than 2016 in California, that will be significant for the future.
Jim Kenney, the Democrat mayor of 'sanctuary city' Philadelphia, threw an embarrassing tantrum on CNN over the President's decision to ban the Philadelphia Eagles from the White House until they learned some manners. Kenney went onto The Don Lemon Show, clearly barely able to contain his rage, unleashing every trite invective he'd learned after nearly 30 years in the Philadelphia City Government.
Kenney also took to Twitter once he'd gotten warmed up. It's hardly worth repeating any of his insults here; there was nothing of any substance in them other than the usual irrational screaming of a typical anti-Trump monomaniac. Kenney has previously said that Trump was more divisive to the US than the Vietnam War; and publicly referred to the President as a "bully and a punk" over Trump's proposed immigration restrictions. He's clearly a fit representative for a team with the Eagles' track-record of thuggish and gutter-level behaviors.
According to the site Areavibes, Philadelphia ranks in the bottom 10% of American cities in terms of livabilty. It also ranks in the bottom 5% in public safety. The unemployment rate in Philadelphia is 61% higher than the national average; the poverty rate is 71% higher. Despite their bloated public school bureaucracy, Philadelphia school test scores are about half of the rest of the country. Like most Democrat-run cities, the Cost of Living Index is disgracefully high.
It seems like Mayor Kenney has a little more serious business than raving about a bunch of millionaire gang-bangers not be invited to a White House party. It also sounds like he could use a lot more of the President's MAGA-philosophy while governing Philadelphia. If there was ever a city needing to be 'made great again', it's his.
As a further indication of the NFL's growing irrelevance to American culture, President Trump cancelled the NFL Champion Philadelphia Eagles' White House celebration.
The President stated: "The Philadelphia Eagles are unable to come with their full team to be celebrated tomorrow. They disagree with their president because he insists that they proudly stand for our National Anthem...The Eagles wanted to send a smaller delegation, but the 1,000 fans planning to attend the event deserve better."
Trump made the proper decision. The Eagles needed a lesson in both civility and humility; and the President delivered them one.
The Eagles should take a lesson, too, from their own history. The team was founded by investors in the darkest days of the Great Depression after their predecessors, the Frankford Yellow Jackets, went bankrupt in 1931. The Eagles were named after FDR's New Deal emblem which featured a blue eagle. The original owners wanted to bring football back to Philadelphia as a way of stimulating the local economy.
During WW2, the Eagles merged with the Pittsburgh Steelers for one season as a wartime economy measure. Up until recent times, the city that saw the United States' birth fielded a sports team that epitomized that American spirit of self-sacrifice and fair play. As an interesting coincidence, the Eagles always seemed to play their best seasons during periods of American recovery. Not only did they begin play as we were pulling out of Depression, their strongest years were post WW2, during the Reagan Recovery, and today.
But Trash Culture has since hit the Eagles as it has the rest of the NFL. They've had two players in jail just since the Super Bowl. One was found unconscious in his car and blocking traffic with controlled substances in his system. The other is accused of beating an elderly and crippled man who didn't get out of his way fast enough.
In 2017, another Eagles' player was implicated in an affair with a married woman and sued. The Eagles' head coach, Doug Pederson, was caught in an adulterous affair when he worked for the Kansas City Chiefs. It's hard to fault the President for not wanting such a gang as representative of America; or endorsing them as role models for young boys.
It's also unsurprising that this same gang would have nothing but contempt for what America represents. Their owner, billionaire Jeffrey Lurie is leading the charge. Lurie is a Hollywood media mogul and has been vocal in his opposition to Trump. Needless to say, he was a significant donor to the Clinton Campaign.
The NFL, simply put, needs to reform or die. That's the message that Trump is sending. But with jokers like Lurie running the show, it may be too late.
Since Obama's second term, Christian-owned businesses have been subject to harassment and legal persecution at the hands of militant homosexuals and anti-Christian bigots like State Attorneys-General Bob Ferguson (Washington) and Xavier Beccara (California). These two worthies embarked on a campaign that bordered on ethnic cleansing.
Christian-owned business---particularly bakeries and caterers---were targeted by homosexuals for bogus 'discrimination' suits. These phony cases served several purposes. One was the malignant satisfaction that Christian-haters got from forcing Christians to serve them against Christian beliefs. Another was that homosexual-owned establishments could force undesirable competitors out of business. Not to mention that activists could extort businesses under the threat of lawsuits for financial gain.
In February, the Trump Administration ended all Federal legal support for such tactics. Today, the US Supreme Court drove the proverbial stake through the vampire's heart. In a 7-2 decision, ruled that the State of Colorado violated bakery-contractor Jack Phillips' 1st Amendment rights by forcing him to cater a homosexual 'wedding'.
The Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a joint communique stating: "Today's ruling confirms that people of faith should not suffer discrimination on account of their deeply-held religious beliefs; but should be respected by government officials. This extends to creative professionals like Jack Phillips who seek to serve Christ in every aspect of their lives. In a pluralistic society like ours, true tolerance allows people with different beliefs to act out those beliefs, even if such beliefs are unpopular with the government."
The Corporate Media has been trying to put the best spin on the decision by repeating---like magpies---that the ruling was 'narrowly defined' and that it 'sets no legal precedent.' Well, unfortunately for them, yes it does. Basically, this ruling is going to put the Burden of Proof on governmental inquisitors to demonstrate that they are not moving legally against these businesses on the basis of religion. This is going to be next to impossible to establish this in Federal Court; and after the Administration's February edict, they will get no support from federal attorneys.
Given the howls of outrage coming from the Gay Mafia, the Rainbow-Pride crowd certainly doesn't think that the ruling was of no consequence. Let's hope that this is only the beginning of taking our country back from Special Interests.
The tech giant Google issued a formal apology yesterday to the California Republican Party after a faulty algorithm listed the term 'Naziism' as one of the Party's core ideologies in a voter-information panel. Google stated that the mistake happened because of trolling on Wikipedia skewing the web-crawling app that collects data.
Google also stated that the error was not the result of "manual manipulation by Google staff." However, there is some room for skepticism here. Google's corporate headquarters is in Mountain View, California---not far from Senator Feinstein's hometown. The Tech Industry has numerous Feinstein donors and Google is a major government contractor. We'll say for now that, while there's no direct evidence that anyone inside Google had any involvement in the alleged error, both incentive and opportunity were present.
Cynthia Bryant, the California GOP Chairwoman said, "It is libelous, and both Wikipedia and Google should take more ownership for what is published on their sites, since they've just accused 5 million Californians of supporting Naziism. It's unfortunate, but it's unlikely to affect the election since everyone with any common sense knows that we don't support Nazi ideology."
She's right: it won't affect the election. But, as we learned from Project Veritas, the potentates in the Corporate Media actually believe that the American public is "stupider than s--t." The Feinstein Campaign, however, is in trouble: and they're desperate enough to try stunts like these.
Their last dirty trick was also based on an alleged error. A real Neo-Nazi named Patrick Little announced his candidacy for the GOP Senate this year. Here were his poll numbers from a month ago:
Emerson: 0%
YouGov: 1%
Gravis: 0%
LA Times/USC: 2%
SurveyUSA: 18%
So which of these polls do you suppose that the Media broadcast all across the country? The one showing the Neo-Nazi in the lead, of course. Even the ultra-Liberal San Francisco Media was obliged to confess that the 18% figure "was probably an aberration."
For some strange reason, it seems that these kinds of errors and aberrations always coincide with a prominent Democrat struggling in the polls. The California GOP Primary is next week---I have a feeling that we'll see a few more 'mistakes' between then and November.
