WHAT STATE OF THE UNION?

     So, as we're writing this, our nominal Head-of-State is putting on a show to tell us all how he's saving the world and all of us Americans from ourselves. It's about as exciting as the last Hollywood/Madison Avenue performance on Tuesday. Remember all of those polls that said that Americans want neither Trump nor Biden in 2024? Well, who won their primaries and secured their nominations?

    It's truly astounding how anybody believes that any of this Electoral stuff is any more real or relevant than the Super Bowl or the Academy Awards, but millions watch those too, so there we go. 

    It's really no argument to pretend that because the President-in-Exile got nominated that this somehow going to save the country. Trump was obstructed and sabotaged just as much by his own Party when he was in office (and still has been during his entire campaign). Right now, they've been angling to choose an Establishment/WEF operative for Trump's Vice-Presidential nominee in the unlikely event that he wins in November. That opens up an interesting possibility for the Deep State. They have become so frustrated with the Junta's continual bungling that they allow the President-in-Exile to win: but recall that Trump is now 77 years of age and that accidents can happen to elderly gentlemen. 

   Most likely though, the current Head-of-State will remain in office. Without or without cheating, the Republican Party as a whole is so incompetent and void of any substance that 2024 will in all probability end up as much of a washout as it has been for the last three years. 

   For example, having learned nothing from the resounding defeats of the likes of Larry Elder, Bruce Jenner, Dr. Oz, and Herschel Walker the Republicans are still trying to win key races with celebrity appeal. Neocons can never admit to being wrong about anything; which is why they continually make the same strategic blunders in everything they do. 

     Steve Garvey, a former professional baseball player and current head of a marketing firm won 32% of the vote and finished second in the California Senate race---laughably because his opponent Democrat Adam Schiff funneled money from his own PAC to Garvey's campaign because he saw Garvey as less of a challenge than his closest Democrat rival. That small detail hasn't stopped the Controlled Opposition from coronating Garvey as the next savior of the cause.

   Not to be outdone, a Congressional committee today passed a Bill approving Republicans' long-standing obsession with banning Tik-Tok. I'm certain that this move is really going to win support from younger voters. Tik-Tok currently has around 113,000,000 subscribers in the United States alone, over half of whom are between 18 and 35 years of age. Of course, the real objective here is to force to Chinese owner Byte Dance to sell the app to some Wall Street consortium rather than ban it outright---because, of course, the Tech Lords and Big Media don't already control enough of the American social media market; and because the Conservatives totally oppose Cancel Culture. 

   There seems to be this strange dissonance in the thinking of the Postmodern Right. They all (so they say) oppose 'woke' Corporatism and Globalism generally, but seem to think that giving more power to the Oligarchs is the way to contain them. Their foreign policy positions are a perfect example: they think that securing the entire region from the Black Sea to the Red Sea for international High Finance and the WEF plutocracy will make the world a safer place---evidently because they need control of more oil, more shipping, and more cheap labor to outsource our jobs to than they already have.

   Congress also earlier this week quietly slipped into their so-called 'Budget Deal' a proviso to sell off the entire New England Oil Reserve to their Corporate cronies. House Speaker Mike Johnson is deeply hooked into the Energy Cartels. According to Open Secrets, the largest industry supporting Johnson since his first federal campaign in 2015 is the oil and gas industry, which has infused $338,000 into Johnson’s campaign coffers. Of that amount, $30,000 came from the Koch Industries PAC. Much of that Oil Cartel cash came from WEF Top 100 Strategic Partner, Chevron, which also is a leading contender for the contracts in the Gaza Oil Fields. Not surprisingly, the Zionists are also major donors to Johnson. Let's see who Chevron's top stakeholders are---do we suppose any of them have WEF connections?

    

   But let's all just keep pretending that all of this malarkey about the "most important election of our lifetimes" really is what it claims to be. Let's all keep pretending that voting the Democrats out will change everything; that the Republicans really aren't working in collusion with them for the benefit of the same vested interests. The persistence of these illusions are what the Neocons count on, and it seems to work for them every single time. 

 

AND YET ANOTHER FORGOTTEN CAMPAIGN ISSUE...

       A little over a year ago, the Controlled Opposition Media was foaming with outrage over a railway disaster that occurred in East Palestine, Ohio. The issue disappeared before the off-year elections and hasn't been brought up since, although problems from the chemical spill still exist, and in fact, railway accidents on our freight lines have been on the increase; in fact, there was another spill into a major river just this week. Working conditions on our freight lines have gotten so bad that even the tepid, accommodating railroad workers' unions threatened a strike recently but were vetoed in their attempts by our Corporate-controlled government. Alan Shaw, the CEO of Norfolk Southern, the shipping cartel involved in both accidents received a substantial pay-raise, however.

      Even though both leading Presidential candidates did photo-ops in East Palestine, very little has been said about either the accidents or the massive lay-offs that are sweeping through the industry---at least the subject is not deemed as urgent as defending the shipping cartels' interests in the Red Sea. 

     The aforementioned Norfolk Southern is one of only six shipping monopolies in the United States dominating freight rail. All six have significant lobbying power inside the Beltway, to wit:

     1. Norfolk Southern: $2.4 million in lobbying dollars last year. They maintain 41 lobbyists, of whom 32 are revolving-door former federal bureaucrats, including former US Senators John Breaux and Trent Lott, as well as former Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania, Patrick Meehan. 

     2. Burlington Northern, which is owned by Berkshire Hathaway: $6.9 million spent on 79 lobbyists, 49 of whom are revolvers including former US Senators the aforementioned John Breaux and Tom Daschle, as well as former Republican Congressman from Kentucky, Ed Whitfield.

    3. CSX: $1.7 million, with 15 lobbyists, 13 of whom are revolving-door.

    4. Canadian National: $1.1 million with 20 lobbyists, 13 of whom are revolvers including former Democrat Congressman from Pennsylvania Ron Klink and former RNC Chairman, Haley Barbour. 

    5. Canadian Pacific Kansas City: nearly $1 million with 23 lobbyists, 19 of whom are revolvers including former Democrat Congressman from Kansas Jim Slattery.

    6. Union Pacific: $3.3 million with 12 lobbyists, 9 of whom are former Beltway operatives, most prominent of whom is the shady Kirk Blalock. 

    

      Well with about $16 million in lobbying cash and 200 hired henchmen to spread it around, it's no wonder that the Political Class has lost interest in things like railway safety, substandard working conditions, and rising freight costs. On top of this distressing situation, consider that the freight cartels have considerably powerful stakeholders involved in the process too. Let's see:

     1. Norfolk Southern: top shareholders include WEF Top 100 Strategic Partners BlackRock, JP Morgan Chase, and Lazard for a combined total of about 17%.

     2. Burlington Northern: is owned by WEF Top 100 Strategic Partner Berkshire Hathaway. Berkshire Hathaway is owned by Warren Buffet, co-chairman of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

     3. CSX: About 10% is owned by WEF Top 100 Strategic Partners BlackRock, JP Morgan Chase and Merrill Lynch International, a subsidiary of WEF Top 100 Strategic Partner, Bank of America.

    4. Canadian National: top shareholder is the aforementioned Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (and WEF Top 100 Strategic Partner). Others include 'woke' NGO, the TCI Foundation, and the Royal Bank of Canada which played a major role in Tienanmen Trudeau's bloody suppression of the 2022 Truckers' Protest.

    5. Canadian Pacific Kansas City: about 10% is held by the aforementioned TCI group and the Royal Bank of Canada.

   6. Union Pacific: About 10% of stock is owned by BlackRock and BOA's subsidiary, Merrill Lynch.

  So, essentially, BlackRock's Larry Fink, British billionaire Chris Hohn, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Jamie Dimon, and Justin Trudeau dominate North America's freight rail system and pay politicians to see to it that nobody gets in their way. One would think that this, too, would be a major campaign issue; but it doesn't appear that anything to do with railways---or infrastructure in general---is a very high priority with the American Electorate. It isn't like when we had a real Conservative movement which believed in free and fair competition and enforcing the law. The Dead White Males who were in charge back then produced a railway system that was the envy of the world with low freight costs and even a stellar passenger service. 

      Today, the massive job cuts, the Corporate looting, and 'woke' ideology has created an atmosphere where increased costs and higher accident rates are inevitable. But the important thing is that we all pretend that it isn't really happening: that farces like Super Tuesday really matter, and voting out the Democrats magically will fix everything. 

AN ELECTION ISSUE THEY DON'T TALK ABOUT

     Blogger Insanity Bytes has had two good recent articles reminding everyone that there are still a lot of unsettled issues relating to the Scamdemic. This being an 'Election Year' in the US, both political machines would rather that we all forgot about things like Democrat governors who imposed martial law but now hold prominent positions in the Junta; or Republicans governors who padlocked churches and sealed borders until they suddenly became champions of medical freedom. To the average Ameroboob, 2020 and 2021 are about as remote a past as the Antediluvian histories of the Old Testament---complete with about as much revisionism of the official story.

      Both articles elicited the predictable outrage from the True Believers, who showered their wrath liberally in the comments sections. Actually, I don't worry about such people too much: authoritarian regimes like ours always have a share of people who'll deny the obvious. In truth, I feel a measure of pity for these poor simps; their intense fear of facing the truth and the ensuing moral choices that they would have to make by accepting it literally paralyzes their Reason and the Official Narrative acts for them like a tranquilizing narcotic. 

    The True Believers aren't really so much of a problem: what's genuinely troubling though is that neither Scamdemic abuses of the past nor the New World Order crowd's future proposals are even on the Electorate's collective radar-screen. No opinion polls reflect any major public concern over the issue, and the only presidential candidate of any standing talking about it has been Robert Kennedy, who has failed to generate much interest. Probably half of the American population doesn't even know who Kennedy is anyway and could care less.

    Scamdemic abuses should be a campaign issue: obviously political leaders who, on behalf of their Wall Street Overlords, participated in such a massive suppression of human rights and such an egregious transfer of wealth---not to mention ongoing national health concerns over pushing untested vaccines---certainly shouldn't be entrusted with any degree of political power again. In fact, they should have to answer for their multitudinous crimes instead of silly Congressional inquisitions about a protest or absurd witch-hunts about alleged 'anti-Semitism.' Of course, that would presume a State where people actually cared about their liberties and a political class willing to uphold them: neither of which we possess today in the United States. In 2022, only one lockdown tyrant lost his position as governor, and even he lost to a disgusting RINO. 2021 saw a similar election trend. 

   Instead, both political machines and the Madison Avenue shylocks managing their campaigns would prefer that the public either remains in a state of blissful apathy or focused on distractions, while demonizing each other's camps for public consumption while working together behind the scenes. This way, nothing upsets public tranquility too much and the Great Reset can go on unabated. 

    

DO WE REALLY NEED ANOTHER 'NATIONAL EMERGENCY'?

    Our immigration system in the United States has been dysfunctional for a long time. Over the years, there have been many stop-gaps, and other patchwork legislation to address the problems without ever really solving much of anything. In spite of that---and in spite of contemporary propaganda---we don't have as serious a problem in that sphere as many other countries; and yes, that includes China and Mexico. 

   During our quadrennial Election Year showcases, the issue comes up regularly and serves as a useful distraction from our multitudinous other problems which the American Political Class is making no effort to solve. This week, the President-in-Exile and the current figurehead of the Junta both visited the US-Mexico Border---as if we don't have a northern border and two seacoasts which are under-defended too. What Biden had to say was about typical for a Neoliberal Democrat. The concerning is what has been coming from the Controlled Opposition on the subject. Because they have so few other issues or accomplishments to promote, the 'Border Crisis' has been hyped to a truly dangerous degree. They bombard us routinely with talk of 'an invasion' and their media outlets nearly every day focus on some crime committed by an illegal immigrant, in much the same way that the Mainstream Media focuses on shootings to promote their anti-2nd Amendment agendas.

  The Republicans are proposing (and actually doing where they can) some very draconian policies aimed at immigration enforcement. I think that we ought to think back to a little recent history and think a little bit about how the GOP has dealt with these kinds of things.

     1. George Bush Sr. declared that the drug problem in the US was 'a national emergency' and proceeded to decimate Constitutional protections against unaccountable police power and eviscerated many of our privacy laws---especially relating to financial privacy.

    2. George Bush Jr. declared 'a national emergency' after the 9/11 terrorist attacks and proceeded to create a Surveillance State and revoked many of the laws on Government transparency.

    3. Over the objections of President Trump and, initially, several Democrats, Republican Governors invoked 'a state of emergency' over a flu outbreak; suspended legislatures, imposed curfews, ruled by decree, illegally sealed State borders, and were the first to order mask mandates. 

   Now is it any wonder that, in 2024, claims of 'a national emergency' over immigration sound about as dangerous as the Left's claims of a 'climate emergency?' 

   The Republicans are talking seriously about establishing internment camps, mass-deportations, crack-downs on businesses hiring illegals and charitable organizations trying to aid them, and some even more violent measures have been suggested. Now, why isn't anybody asking the obvious questions here?

   The measures that the Republicans are proposing couldn't help but expand the powers of the Police/Surveillance State radically. To prove legal status would almost require some kind of National Identification Papers. Private homes and businesses would be subject to having their doors kicked in (moreso than they already are) on mere allegations. Police checkpoints could re-surface after being overturned by the Courts after some earlier GOP-led 'emergency.' Financial snooping would necessarily expand too: and the Republicans haven't expressed much opposition to (actually many support) a transition to Digital Currency. 

   As usual, Americans tend to act first and think later; and most are assuming---just like they assumed before---that such tough new measures only will effect other people. "If you're not doing anything wrong, you've got to worry about?" they snort, just like they said before about drug dealers and terrorists being the only ones who had anything to fear. 

   The problem with all of these Bush-era Republicans is that they fail to understand that the use of government force is the last---not the first---option that civilized societies resort to when solving problems. Even then, it is to be used with as much restraint as possible---a concept that has been observed since the time of St. Augustine. This is also conspicuously absent from Republican political discourse: they seem to take a perverse delight not only in employing power but in employing it as ruthlessly and disproportionately as possible. It's no argument to say 'Oh, but the Liberals do it too!' We're supposed to be different from them. Ever since Bush's kinder, gentler America, our side has countered the extremism of the Left with even more extremism and it hasn't worked either in practical results or in winning popular support. 

    In fact, these heavy-handed tactics have actually caused more problems at the Border than they have solved. Criminal gangs and terrorists are a lot more likely to risk being gunned down by government thugs than ordinary asylum-seekers or laborers. This is exactly what happened during Bush's War on Drugs: the corner drug-dealers disappeared while vicious cut-throat cartels took over entire neighborhoods. 

   Likewise, most of the migrants surging at the Border are coming from countries under the thumb of Wall Street/Beltway interests. Either they are from countries languishing under draconian sanctions (e.g. Venezuela, Cuba) or countries whose governments have imported American cultural and economic exceptionalism and have eroded their working classes like ours have been (e.g. El Salvador, Haiti). 

  There are ways to fix our immigration and border-control problems without stripping Americans of what few freedoms we still possess. Any political movement depending on Force and Fear to govern is not a movement we should support under any circumstances.

   

WHY THE SILENCE FROM THE CHURCHIAN RIGHT?

     Compared to just a few weeks ago, it seems as though the Civil War in Palestine has dropped out of the news cycle. The war is still going on; but it seems as though the Controlled Opposition sites have forgotten about it. It wasn't that long ago that anybody who didn't stand with the Zionists were 'anti-Semites' and that this was 'Israel's 9/11'---and what happened to the West's War for Existence?' Why aren't we getting daily reminders any more that 'there are no innocents in Gaza' or that 'the world won't be safe until every Palestinian is dead?'

    The war is about to enter its fifth month, and several things are being abundantly clear: to the point where Neocon and Churchian apologists for the Zionists can't make excuses any longer. The first cause is the bravery of the Palestinian people, who've stood off a vastly superior military (armed and trained by our Pentagon) and inflicted heavy casualties on the Zionist fanatics that even their stranglehold on the Media can no longer hide. The Palestinians have won the admiration of the civilized world for refusing to submit in the face of unparalleled barbarity.

   The second reason is that that very barbarism itself is becoming increasingly more difficult to gloss over. Videos of IDF goons commandeering houses of worship and gloating over torture they've committed there; their drunken soldiers dancing and celebrating over their kill-counts; medical crews intentionally murdered; journalists targeted for assassination; elderly people shot down in church doorways: this is becoming an apparent strain on even the tolerance levels of American Churchian hypocrites. This weekend, the "bulwark of Western democratic values" engaged in a Canadian-style brutality, crushing a protest by Israeli citizens. 

   As if there was already a level of depravity that the Zionists hadn't reached, they managed to crown all of their crimes on Thursday by massacring a group of Palestinian civilians under a flag of truce and truckloads of humanitarian aid. Last week, the Regime began targeting and expelling UN and other humanitarian aid groups, taking over the responsibility themselves. As the convoys reached the aid center, “Numerous people fell from the trucks while attempting to take a bag of flour, and many others were targeted while carrying a carton of canned goods or a bag of flour to feed their starving family members.” Ismail al-Ghoul, a reporter with Al Jazeera said. "After opening fire on them, Israeli tanks ran over dead and injured people and that ambulances were unable to reach the scene because the roads are totally destroyed.” Another eyewitness noted that: "IDF troops opened fire twice – waiting until the first aid-seekers had returned to the truck from hiding to shoot them again." About 112 people were killed and nearly 1,000 wounded in this latest atrocity.

   Since the revolt began on October 7th, we've put the question out to any Christians in the Western world how they can justify Israel's actions. So far, no takers: and it doesn't appear as if there will be. The postmodern Churchian Right has difficulty enough justifying its own actions against Christ's teachings, let alone anybody else's.

    The really dangerous thing is that what we're seeing in Israel is, essentially, what these Christian Nationalists ---or whatever they call themselves--- advocating for in this country being put into actual practice. It's one thing to play an Alpha on a keyboard, but the situation in Palestine is a real-life demonstration of those ideologies carried out to their logical conclusions. This may be another reason why the Controlled Opposition is avoiding too much discussion about Gaza these days: with an election coming up, people might start noticing a few too many similarities. Worse still (for them), they might start connecting the dots between Israel, the Republican Party, and the Great Reset.

    Americans need to stop ignoring the situation in Palestine and, if nothing else, look very closely at the Regime running Israel and what they are doing, because that is the future of our own country if the Neocons and their Alt-Right confederates manage to regain power. If anybody doubts that this is so, look at our US Congress and most Republican-controlled State Legislatures. We look in vain for politicians working for the benefit of all Americans: instead we see kowtowing to the Corporations, draconian laws, and endless inquisitions and Lawfare against political opponents. In short, they are no better than the Left, and arguably worse in many respects. Combined with their overheated rhetoric, it's not difficult to envision a Netanyahu-style Regime evolving here under the banner of 'Conservatism.' Most Americans even believe that Israel is a 'right-wing' government, when in reality it's at least as far Left as Macron, King Charles, or Justin Trudeau have made their Regimes. There isn't a single Blue State in America that wouldn't be preferable to living in Israel. 

     What we desperately need in the United States is an actual Conservative party again. This isn't likely to happen until Christians and Conservatives start assuming some responsibility for self-government and start behaving like Christians again instead of adherents of the Cult of the Super-Man. 

     

    

REAGAN-APPOINTED JUDGE SWATS DOWN GREG ABBOTT

     It's a rare thing these days when a Conservative scores a victory for Liberty over the Reactionary Republicans. On Thursday, Federal Judge David Ezra---who was appointed to the Federal Bench by Ronald Reagan---blocked a Texas law scheduled to go into effect next week which drastically would have expanded Police State powers under the pretext of fighting illegal immigration. If the law had gone into effect, it would have authorized any and all law enforcement to arrest, and judges to order removed, anyone merely suspected of having entered Texas without presenting identification papers. 

     "I fear that the United States could become a confederation of states enforcing their own immigration laws. That is the same thing the Civil War said you can’t do," Ezra told the State's attorneys.

    

     A similar law attempted by so-called 'Conservatives' in Arizona was struck down in 2012. Similar laws to Texas' were being proposed by other Neocon thugs in Florida, North Carolina, and Louisiana. What ought to shame American Conservatives is that an Attorney for the Texas ACLU had more of a Conservative statement than they have:

     “The federal court’s decision confirms over a century of Supreme Court precedent, affirming that immigration enforcement is squarely within the federal government’s authority. S.B. 4 is a blatantly unconstitutional attempt to bypass federal law."

    Not only is it not a Conservative value to usurp the United States Constitution whenever it's convenient: it's also hardly a Conservative position to authorize police forces to stop and detain anyone at will and demand they present identification papers. Unfortunately, today, we don't have anything like an actual Conservative party anymore: since the first Bush Administration, Conservatives have felt totally at ease with expanding the Police/Surveillance State whenever one of their gauleiters declare "a national emergency." We saw it again and again: during the Drug War; post-9/11; the Scamdemic---today it's "an immigrant invasion" which is just about as fake a pretext as the others were. 

   The Neocons and their Alpha Alt-Right confederates believe (so they say) in smaller government, so naturally all of these tight new immigration laws they have planned will be farmed out to private prison and security industries, which give this party a lot of financial support. Some of the policies that they've been yakking about during the 2024 campaign would involve a massive expansion of the Police State; including mandatory identification papers, detention camps, criminalizing religious and charitable institutions, and likely facilitate the shift to digital currency "to combat workplaces hiring illegals," of course. 

    A real Conservative position would be to enact sensible immigration laws, with amnesty for those already here and contributing, a stronger presence at our borders, and shutting down swine like George Soros and his Neocon pals who are creating Border surges. But that wouldn't be Alpha enough for our new breed of realistic Republicans: as we saw in our last post, they are just as committed to destroying democracy as the Left is---provided that they get to destroy it and be the power-brokers themselves instead. 

    

    

    

PRIMARIES, CPAC, AND THE GREAT RESET

     So the Controlled Opposition today is brimming with excitement because the President-in-Exile won the South Carolina Primary, although again by a less wide margin than experts had predicted. WEF Young Global Leader Nikki Haley is staying in the race; and her WEF cohort, Vivek Ramaswamy finished at the top of a CPAC poll for potential Vice-Presidents. Trump is also being pressured to celebrate diversity and Tim Scott---one of the biggest grifters in the Senate---was suggested; as was WEF Young Global Leader Tulsi Gabbard and Sarah Palin clone, Kristi Noem. It seems as though the Deep State is hedging its bets here again; they realize that they can't stop Trump from being nominated: so after failing to get a replacement, they're focusing on his successor. In the unlikely event that Trump actually wins the 2024 Election, recall that he is 77 years old and that accidents can happen to people of that age. 

    For whatever their words are worth, the pollsters at Quinnepac released a poll showing that the SC Primary didn't help much: for the first time in a while Biden is leading Trump by a narrow margin. This might not mean much, but the little detail that everyone is ignoring is that the same poll showed Biden losing by a more substantial margin if he was matched against Nikki Haley. 

   Those poll results show that things really aren't boding well for a 'Red Wave' in November, because what it really highlights is something that we've been warning about since 2021: the GOP's shift to the Far Right is not going to win them support. To underscore this point, consider that the Republican-controlled Congress' approval ratings are barely into double-digits; and while Biden's approval ratings are nothing to brag about, they are about 300% higher than what the GOP 'leadership' has been able to muster. 

   In their headlong rush to self-destruction, the Republican Party took a decisive turn to the hard Right at the CPAC convention over the weekend. Shady provocateur Jack Posobiec opened the proceedings by stating: "Welcome to the end of democracy. We are here to overthrow it completely. We did not get there all the way on Jan 6, but we will endeavor to get rid of it." This got a round of applause from the crowd. 

  Since the Biden/Harris Junta has alienated American Moslems by their slavish support for Zionism, the Republicans decided to sabotage their (once) growing support among Latinos by advocating Zionist-style tactics against Hispanics' relatives at home and abroad. Alt-Right figure Stephen Miller said:

  "The immigration issue is extremely simple. The simple part is seal the border, deport all the illegals. You would establish large-scale staging grounds for removal flights. So you would grab illegal immigrants and then you move them to the staging grounds, and that’s where the planes are waiting for federal law enforcement to then move these illegals home… You deputize the National Guard to carry out immigration enforcement and then you also deploy the military to the southern border, not just with a mission to observe, but with an impedance and denial mission. In other words, you reassert the fundamental constitutional principle that you don’t have a right to enter into our sovereign territory to even request the asylum claim. The military has the right to establish a fortress position on the border, and to say, 'No one can cross here at all.'" (Except, of course, when other countries defend their borders, but we digress). 

   Tom Homan, former Commissar of the corrupt ICE agency said of a future GOP Administration:

   "He will abolish the criminal cartels in Mexico. He will take them on, because the country of Mexico is not doing a damn thing about the cartels who have killed more Americans than any terrorist organization. President Trump will declare them a terrorist organization, he will send a Hellfire rocket down there and he will take the cartels out… There has to be an historic deportation operation. It has to be that way, there is no other option. It’s the right thing to do." (We've all seen how well American missile barrages have worked in the Middle East, but we digress). 

   Bush Machine toady Congressman Dan Bishop of North Carolina chimed in: "The significance of what you just said Stephen, and all the things you just laid out, we got to have a president to do it, but you also cannot proceed in a way in which you are tentative and unsure. The idea that you deport everybody… that’s just cause. It’s obvious because that’s what has to occur. Our nation’s survival depends on that sort of aggressiveness in asserting ourselves."

    Along with effusive praise for Israeli strongman and WEF member Benjamin Netanyahu, Argentine President (and also a WEF member) Javier Milei made an appearance. Milei, a self-described anarcho-capitalist who wielded a chainsaw during his campaign last year to signal his plans to disembowel Argentina’s government and sell as much of the country off to Wall Street as humanly possible, was joined by Salvadoran strongman Nayib Bukele, who is a strong advocate for digital IDs and currency. 

     So let us analyze what we're being sold here. The Biden/Harris Junta is dangerous for the country, that is a fact. That the Junta is a figurehead for Globalist Corporate Cartels is also a fact. The antidote for this, we're told is:

    1. A more militarized Police and Surveillance State to combat the national emergency of illegal immigration (like the Left did during the Scamdemic).

   2. Setting up Federal Detention Camps (like the Left proposed to do the unvaxxed). 

   3. Holding up foreign dictators as role models (like the Left does with Ukraine and Canada).

   4. Unilaterally bombing other countries who don't kowtow to the Deep State's demands (like the Left does in the Middle East).

   5. Promoting WEF Young Global Leaders to positions of power (like the Left does across the board).

   6. Sealing the borders (like the Left did during the Scamdemic).

   7. Committing to overthrowing democracy (like the Left is also committed to doing).

   It should be obvious to anybody that we have no Conservative party in America at all any more: what we have are Neocons and Alt-Rightists who are exposing themselves for what they really are: the Reactionary Left. 

   In other words, all of this nonsense is only for show and the Oligarchy wins either way. Either they get an authoritarian government who does their bidding and calls it a 'popular mandate;' or the Republicans get wiped out again and the Junta goes forward with the Great Reset because they have a 'popular mandate.' Maintaining the illusion of a having a Popular Mandate for their schemes is the only reason that the Oligarchs permit us to have Elections any more in the first place.