Friday, February 16, 2018

DALROCK: REAL CONSERVATIVES BEAT WOMEN

      Dalrock---one of the ringleaders of the Red Pill/Game Cult--- has joined in a chorus of post-Valentines Day voices denouncing cultural respect for women. His blog has become something of a conduit for misogynists. Alt-RINOs, and latent homosexuals to sneer at cuckservatives. Now, to these jokers, a Cuckservative basically defines all Conservatives whose social politics aren't to the right of Benito Mussolini's. They are also vocal critics of the Church, pretending in both instances that they are the real Christians and Conservatives. 

       Dalrock has titled one of his recent posts, Feminism + Chivalry = Modern Conservatives. Even the premise of the title is wrong. Feminism advocates that chivalry is demeaning. And what Dalrock and the rest of his cult advocates is in line with that same perspective. It's impossible that feminism and chivalry can coexist; hence advocating abolishing chivalry is a feminist position itself.

       Dalrock is outraged by an article in The Federalist explaining why it's important to teach boys not to hit girls. He and one of his disciples, Larry Kummer, have taken issue with this position: the latter posting about it on his own site, Fabius Maximus. Kummer is a notorious crank who also contributes an investment site called Seeking Alpha. He's on record as saying that the Game/PUA movement is "the latest counter-revolution to Feminism." As we assert, though, it's actually an extension of feminism---whereby men adopt feminist premises and treat women accordingly. The Conservative position, though, is that Feminism is harmful to women. Understood in this context, one can see how violence against women is a logical outcome of feminism; and why the Red Pills are merely an extension of it. 

        In essence, Dalrock and Kummer are really male feminists themselves. Their whole social philosophy is gynocentric---Game is nothing more than accepting feminist stereotypes and reacting to them. Kummer admits this much, and Dalrock quotes him favorably as saying:

       "We have broken the old gender regime. It can no more be restored than toothpaste can be put back in the tube." 

        Andrea Dworkin taught much the same thing. But the Big Lie here is that the 'old gender regime' is not broken. Gender is biological and gender-roles have been with us since prehistoric times. We actually find what we call 'chivalry' in extent ancient literature: across the board the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians and Hebrews practiced it in one form or another. The evidence even from prehistoric artifacts indicate that a special value was placed on women even then. This isn't going to change because a few modern crackpots say that it has, or will. The French Jacobins, Russian Bolsheviks, and Cambodian Khmer Rouge said the same thing. But they are gone while the populations of France, Russia, and Cambodia live mostly by the same social rules they always have, 

        Dalrock goes on to repeat more feminist talking-points: "As Kummer notes, chivalry is a vestige of a previous time, and is inconsistent with an age where we are repeatedly told that women are as tough as men. Today most people accept the feminist position that not including women in Delta and SEAL Team 6 is a terrible injustice."

        First, it's doubtful that 'most people' believe that women should be commandos; but what Dalrock and Kummer overlook is the fact that the Pentagon blockheads who pushed for female inclusion had to lower the training standards so that women could qualify. In other words, they tacitly admitted themselves that women are not as tough as men. 

        These Red Pills seem to be the types of guys who, back in school, either got beaten up by girls or got beaten up by other boys for bullying girls. That's another way they're like feminists: they're projecting their own sexual frustrations on society at large. 

         As Conservatives, we believe in protecting and defending women as those who hold the future of mankind in their hands. As Christians, we believe in the same thing because Christ taught us to do so. And it's also just common sense. 





          

5 comments:

  1. Thank you!!! An in depth analysis of the MRA, MGTOW, MHRM et al... does reveal far too many similarities between themselves and the most toxic feminists. As one instance, an intense hatred of Valentine's Day... Hatred of the right wing sect of politics, hatred of Christianity... I could go on for a long time...

    How about a slight modification...we believe in protecting women who aren't human garbage...?

    Sorry, but I would not waste my time protecting a gang member or a drug addict, or a vindictive ex wife (no matter whose wife she was)...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome. I suppose one does have to use one's judgment on whom to protect. And there are a few disturbed females who like to be abused; or enjoy getting men to fight over them, etc. But then again, some of them have the 'all men are pigs' attitude, and intervening may help change that belief.

      Delete
  2. Uhg. Dalrock is just ugly.

    Some aspects of chivalry are hard wired into us, a part of our biology, of our design. We can certainly try to alter our design but if you want genuine joy, fulfillment, than it is far better to simply embrace it. Men who have women, children to look after, territory to defend, have a sense of purpose, of pride, satisfaction in what they have built. And women who are surrounded by good men, tend to be happy too, content, joyful. So all the way around, it's a good deal, it's what was designed for us, in order to create something pleasing. Obviously we often get it all wrong and the world is broken, but the more you can lean into God and His design for us, the better your life will be.

    Bit funny, I had jury duty once, there was a threat made, and so we all got ushered into a safe zone by some lady cops. What was so amusing was that there were two guys on the jury, older men, and we all just kind of naturally huddled behind them. The lady cops were doing their job, very professional, but just the same instincts kicked in, and rather than perceiving these women as our security team, we all gathered around these two elderly guys who weren't even armed. So who is REALLY going to lead us through the dark and scary basement and into forced exile? Not the women, sorry. Biology and instincts can be a bit sexist. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you---that is very true. It's almost impossible to change these basic instincts. It's even being learned today that some of the Nazi war criminals were severe drug addicts. They had to self-medicate to carry out such ruthless atrocities and then live with themselves afterwards.

      Delete
    2. True. Basic instincts cannot be changed, except maybe with Prozac et al... you know, the head med so prevalent in this country ... of which women consume twice as much as men...

      Delete