INDIAN SUMMER AND THE REAL WORLD

   So, we're back from an Indian Summer vacation. Autumn got off to a late start here, so it was nice to have good weather through October as we have. Then it was back to the 'scene'. During the interval, the usual happened. The news was the usual cycle of mass-shootings, the Great Reset marching on, ridiculous sex scandals, and an absolutely meaningless election next month. And, of course, it's all Russia's, or China's, or immigrants', or Biden's, or Trump's fault depending on whichever reliable source one chooses to listen to. 

   

   And, yes, I did say a meaningless election. I realize that the talking-points of both factions of the Uniparty claim this is "the most important election of our lifetime": something they've said about every election that I can remember. With a strong plurality of Americans completely blown out on drugs---to the point where 1 in 20 can't even identify their own gender---we can't expect anyone to remember 2020 all that clearly, let alone 2018 and beyond.

   I'm tending to agree with Norwegian author Bjorn Bull-Hansen that the further we get away from Nature, the further we drift away from any sense of Reality. I don't mean this in the same sense that the Climate-Crisis kooks mean it. Cities, electricity, highways, mass-communications, factories, chemicals, jets: these aren't bad things. What I'm referring to is the growing danger to our Republic of a people increasingly unaware of how Nature operates and increasingly out of touch with a sense of Cause and Effect. How is self-government supposed to function in a society where many (if not most) have no idea how babies are made, how the weather works, how money is created, or how food is produced? 

  The Election 'issues' are a case in point. The Whacko Left Wing is fighting for the 'right' to abort babies even though not a single one of them has the slightest idea of why that might be a desirable thing. They also fear 'racism' and 'extremism' though nobody can define what either of those things actually mean. As for the Controlled Opposition, they promise us at least two more years of useless investigations and silly impeachment attempts. That, and vowing to crack down on immigration and stop being such weenies when confronting our foreign 'enemies' like Russia and China. Never mind that none of that will fix our failing schools, corrupt legal establishment, encourage families or small businesses, reverse out-of-control crime and drug addiction, or renovate our collapsing infrastructure. 

  If polls generated by the Mainstream Media can be believed, inflation and cost-of-living issues are the most important. It may be so, but what solutions have we been offered? The Democrats want more taxing and spending, which will make the problem worse. The Republicans want to give away even more government to Corporate America, which will also make the problem worse. 

  In fact, the problem with the American Right is that it largely has become what it once opposed. We only have to look at most 'Conservative' websites to see this clearly. 

  1. The Right, during the Trump years criticized the Democrat lie that the 2016 Election was stolen with Russian collusion. Today they promote the lie that 2020 was stolen with Chinese collusion. That it was stolen largely by supranational Corporate bureaucrats goes ignored. 

 2. The Right has criticized the January 6 Show-Trials and other political pogroms being launched by the Junta. Their solution? Put the Left on show-trials and use the Surveillance/Security State against them.

 3. The Right raised alarm about the draconian proposals to segregate and disenfranchise those who refused the Loyalty Vaxx. They see no problem however, with depriving immigrants of employment and loading them on buses and dumping them somewhere else.

 4. The Right criticized the Whacko Left's movement to defund the police, yet they are openly calling for the abolition of the FBI. No talk, however, about dismantling Bush-era expansions of federal secret police forces and domestic espionage systems which actually do trample on American Rights and do nothing to fight actual crime (e.g. DHS, ICE, TSA, etc.)

 5. The Right criticizes Cancel Culture, yet seems to want to employ political litmus tests for federal funding, tax breaks, and government contracts themselves. Nobody is asking whether any of this funding, unequal taxation, or outsourcing of government functions should be legal in the first place.

   The worst feature of the Postmodern Right though is it's increasing disregard for any sense of tolerance and compromise---or the consequences of any of their actions. If one actually presents them facts; say, the humanitarian disaster that would follow mass-deportations and disenfranchisement of immigrants (not to mention the sheer cost and impact on small businesses and larger farms); the response is typically something like an indifferent shrug. "Oh well, that's their problem." 

  The same with banning abortion (which I do favor). A ban on abortion would increase our badly-declining birth rates, but admittedly children are expensive. Suggesting a sensible policy like Russia's of extending their version of AFDC to all mothers---which has actually encouraged childbirth and traditional families there---is met with horror. "No way! That's increasing welfare!" So, I suppose that instead of more women at home raising families, the solution is to put them in the fields to pick the tomatoes that the migrant farm workers are no longer allowed to do. 

   

    I think that if anyone analyzes the attitudes of most Postmodern 'Conservatives' one will see that they've actually internalized the predominate Liberal mythology that socioeconomic issues are a zero-sum game. The Left reflexively and uncritically believes that someone else's prosperity comes at the expense of others. The Right has adopted the same philosophy, and assume that our recent socioeconomic decline is because the poor and working classes are demanding too much; or that an 'invasion' of immigrants is responsible. In a corrupt system like ours has become, it's easy to see how such conclusions might be reached; but neither the productive rich nor the working poor are to blame. 

  We can see this zero-sum mentality played out in obvious relief in foreign policy. It's assumed that Chinese economic growth or Russia's successful social programs represent a loss for the United States. Instead of learning from what they've done to succeed or fixing our own problems, the Right engages in the politics of envy, and makes these countries 'enemies' out of sheer jealousy. They demonize immigrants for the same reason: the strong religious, family, and work ethic brought in from the so-called Third World exposes American deficiency in all of these areas.

  None of this projection, of course, is solving (or going to solve) any of our national problems, because none of it addresses problems which Americans face as a whole. It's all about owning the Libtards---not by proving or offering a better plan, but by engaging in 'political theater'; i.e. getting the dupes to buy a message spun by Madison Avenue marketing firms and social media. As Jonah Goldberg, formerly of the National Review said, “As the country’s become more polarized, and we reward the outrageous beyond its worst, you get this race-to-the-bottom competitiveness, where people want to get noticed and have to be even more outrageous than the next person.” Nikki Haley, the former UN Ambassador, told a group of students recently that, "owning the libs is fun and that it can feel good, but step back and think about what you’re accomplishing when you do this — are you persuading anyone? Who are you persuading? … We’ve all been guilty of it at some point or another, but this kind of speech isn’t leadership — it’s the exact opposite.”

   That sort of advice falls upon deaf ears these days because, as noted, people mostly have lost any sense of Cause and Effect. We could defeat the NWO Left by exposing what they are, defeating them with logic, and offering a better way that addresses many of their concerns. But that strategy is not 'Alpha' for the postmodern Right: and they would rather show that they can be more extreme and more ruthless than the Left. This has been tried before and failed. Right-Wing European politicians tried it during the 1930s as the antidote to the extremism of Communist movements. The result? By the 1940s, they'd made Joseph Stalin and Chairman Mao look like political moderates. 

   That's going to be the same result if the postmodern Right continues on its current course. It's one thing to listen to Left-Wing pundits spout off about throwing the Unvaxxed out of society; it's another thing to watch Republican governors actually do it to immigrants and realizing the truth that mere talk and concrete actions are two different things. We don't need---or want---a Right-Wing version of Justin Trudeau in the United States. People will naturally choose what they perceive to be the lesser of two evils: the relative safety of Socialism will draw more votes than the brutality of Fascism. Maybe our side's strategy should be to offer something other than an alternative evil. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem like it's going to happen any time soon.

  
      

ON PERISCOPES OR SOMETHING

   Blogger InsanityBytes had a fun post up today about some of the further misadventures of Red Pill orbiter Doug Wilson. I'm not going to go too deeply into Wilson's strange theologies, but his use of the term perpilocutionist caught my attention. If you've studied Latin, you can have hours of entertainment trying to decipher its meaning. More likely, Wilson's readers will just take it for granted that Wilson understands it and therefore must be smarter than them and therefore what he says about it must be true---whether one understands what he's saying or not. 

  This is another example of a trend that I noticed appearing a little over a decade ago. First it started among Libertarian blogs and articles and then among the Red Pill Cult; and now it's starting to see some prevalence among mainstream Conservative and Churchian sites. The trend is to employ these big, obscure words that no one uses or understands to gain credibility. We used to have a big, though more common word for that too: pretentious. 

   It's bad enough that the Left does this; although their method is to make simpler sounding words (or neologisms, if you prefer). Terms like homophobia, sexism, gender essentialism, denialism---none of these expressions mean anything, but they are thrown around authoritatively as if they were real concepts. Most NPCs on the Left couldn't explain any of them if asked to do so; but they will assure us that smart people have a consensus that they are very bad things. 

  All of this reminds me of a story from the Old Country that aged relatives passed on to me. A corrupt priest who'd been run out of Central America came back to the Parish with some quetzal feathers that he'd obtained. He convinced the poor dupes in the rural European towns---where most people were still serfs who'd never travelled further than 10 miles from home in their lives and could barely sign their own names---that these were feathers from the Angel Gabriel. They would pay him to touch the holy relics while he recited some arcane terms in Latin (which turned out to be lines from the Roman comedian Plautus; this guy truly had no shame). This happened around the time of the French Revolution and a visiting scholar exposed the fraud. The only feathers the priest ended up with were attached to him with a good coat of tar. 

   The moral of this story is that during the larger social upheaval in France afterwards, memories of things like that didn't exactly win the Church very many supporters. It's bound to backfire on the postmodern political/social Right too. We expect the Left to use dirty tricks with the language, bend laws, ignore principles to get what they want. The tactics, however, are not consistent with public perceptions of what a Conservative should be doing. It makes the leadership look like complete hypocrites and their supporters look like a bunch of ignorant peasants and plays into all the negative Leftist narratives and stereotypes. We forget sometimes that Leftist philosophy is heavily based in Cynicism, and when those on the Right adopt the means of the Left that tends to reinforce the already-low opinion most Liberals entertain about human nature. 

  Overall, I believe that there are three reasons why we're seeing these kinds of trends on the Right:

   1. Many on the Right have internalized the values of the Left. This is very apparent with the Manosphere Red Pills who've essentially absorbed Radical Feminism and re-packaged it. We're starting to see this ugly trend manifested in 'Conservative' social policy like embracing Cancel Culture, Lawfare, and imposing their own versions of the Left's authoritarianism. 

   2. Many on the Right believe that Conservatism has failed. While Conservatism preaches life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness based on the universal equality of man; this idea has been drifting steadily into the Alpha superman ideal where Might Makes Right and into a crude version of Social Darwinism where ruthless competition and the 'survival of the fittest' are justifications for the strong to lord over the weak, This is a concept also imported from the Red Pill Cult. The only real criticism that most of this philosophy has with the Left is that they consider the Liberals to be too weak, too concerned with compassion and even 'social justice' which they've turned into a pejorative term. 

  3. Many on the Right actually do have contempt for the Common Man. The Neocons and Bush-Republicans stand out here; but the so-called Alt-Right is also quite open about displaying it. They talk about controlling the narrative regardless of any truth involved in it. Like the Left does, their whole intent is to deceive, because at heart they don't believe the average man intelligent enough to decide what is for his own good. 

  All of this is bad enough, but the Red Pill goal is to change ordinary men into manly Alpha leaders who dominate their inferiors: their families, co-workers, etc. The Alpha is a blend of faux Stoicism, unbridled selfishness, and a tendency to see others as subhumans. Needless to say, such an outlook doesn't promote things like love for one's neighbor or empathy---which the Alpha considers weak and effeminate values. Once a man becomes an Alpha, he really has nothing more to do than reign as supreme lord over those in his own ego-field and contemplate his superiority over the average human. 

  Naturally, the only person capable of actually governing a nation of Alphas is an Uber-Alpha (or Sigma, as Vox Day calls this type). This is somebody strong and ruthless enough that other Alphas automatically submit to his authority and well, I think that we can all see where this sort of thinking leads.

   This is the point where abusing terminology actually becomes dangerous. We've already seen it with the Left. People lose their jobs or get censored and blacklisted for phantom concepts like 'homophobia.' A protest can turned into an 'insurrection' and subject one to sham trials in kangaroo courts. Do we really want to see this on the Right?

  Already, illegal immigration on the US-Mexican Border---which has been a problem for over a century---has suddenly become an invasion. Social welfare programs---including things like drug treatment--- have become communist. Sensible sexual education of minors has become paedophilia. There is actual discussion on 'Conservative' forums about imposing future loyalty tests in places like public schools. If we go to these kinds of extremes, we become what the Left is. The only difference is that the jackboot is on the other foot. 

  Through all the big words and the tough talk, there is a decided lack of any constructive solutions coming out of the Right. It's nothing but talk of revenge, punishment, and projecting power. This isn't Conservatism, whatever else it may be. 

  Conservatism is premised on the belief of a Government that is a servant---not the master---of a nation. In Conservatism, the function of a Government is to maintain freedom by protecting life, liberty, and property. There is no place in Conservativism for revolutionary ideologies which hold to any notion of a Master Race, whether that be self-appointed Alphas or self-appointed Elites with delusions of a Great Reset. Whether the postmodern Right wants to accept it or not, Conservatism is based on equality. The Law under Conservatism is to intervene in defense of the collective Rights of life, liberty, and property. "Beating the Left at their own Game" is still a surrender to the Left, no matter how it's spun. 

   

   

     

    

    

   

THE MAN BEHIND THE MASK

      In our last article, we learned that American Public Schools are not content with poisoning children's minds and souls; they are poisoning their bodies as well. As expected too, the silence in the Controlled Opposition 'Conservative' media has been noticeable as well. The American Right has its Third-Rail Topics too. With an election allegedly coming up next month and fantasies of a 'Red Wave' dancing in their heads, it's probably not considered politically expedient to call out American families for being the collection of deadbeats and failures that most of them actually are. It's much easier to blame Government when one is even a token opposition party. 

     A comment I left on a related article recently took a slightly different view of the situation. It was ignored and very likely shadowbanned.  

    "I stopped feeling sorry for American parents after they demanded---over Democrat objections no less---to send their kids straight back to public school hell-holes in 2020. How long have we known that there's sex-trafficking in the juvenile justice system? (since the 80s at least) How long have we known that so-called child welfare is hopelessly corrupt and unaccountable? Or that the public schools and universities were being radicalized? (Since at least the 90s on both). The Homo Agenda has been pushed on the young for the last two decades.

   "What have Conservatives done about it? Nothing. Nothing but look the other way and preaching to their kids to 'go-along-to-get-along' and 'go-with-the-flow'. Polls in 2022 show that these issues don't even crack the top ten with 'Conservative' voters."

   If that didn't sting badly enough, the next paragraphs really must have smarted:

  "Census figures also show that only about half of kids under 12 live with both biological parents and at least 1 in 4 women have had an abortion. Sure: I'll bet that all of those numbers are Liberal Democrats. Only 12 States have banned abortion since (after 50 years of inactivity) SCOTUS finally overturned Roe v. Wade.

  "Conservative apathy and hypocrisy are as responsible for situations like these as Democrat activism. Until we start facing the FACT that we're a failed society on top of being a failed democracy, nothing is going to change--in fact it will get worse, Red Wave or no Red Wave."

  Harsh? Maybe so, but it needs to be said. Frankly, I defy any Conservative to challenge any of what was said. 

   Prior to 2020, I was active in many educational reform programs. Some long-forgotten projects like School Vouchers and Charter Schools actually made ballots with varying success. There were other plans floated like mandatory performance audits of school budgets, capping useless academic bureaucracies, breaking up monopolies like teachers' unions, etc. More recently, I became impressed with some of the successful reforms in Russia such as extending their equivalent of AFDC to all women with children which encouraged stay-at-home mothering; and their expulsion of sinister foreign-owned NGOs from their schools and universities. 

   The school lockdowns of 2020---completely illegal as they were---was the ideal moment to demand change and expand parental rights and control over education. But it didn't happen. In fact, the opposite happened; and it was the so-called 'Conservatives' who led the opposition.

   It's like a retired doctor friend of mine said recently: "2020 was the year that the masks went on our faces, but the masks came off our souls."

  

   The Left opposed reopening---admittedly for all the wrong reasons. They maintained that because of the so-called 'pandemic' it wouldn't be safe to reopen schools: apparently the rampant violence, drugs, bullying, unsafe food, and gaslighting wasn't considered by the Left as especially dangerous before. But in spite of that, the Liberals finally agreed---with major conditions attached like mandatory masks, loyalty vaxxes, social distancing and whatever other sadistic humiliations that their lurid imaginations could devise to inflict on defenseless children. And 'Conservatives' wholeheartedly went for it.

   For a lot of us Conservatives, 2020 broke a lot of our illusions. Most of us knew that there was an active Deep State and vested interests working against our liberties. And it's not as though there weren't false flags and attempted coups within recent memory. Most of us believed that Trump's win and global events like BREXIT marked a turning-point. If the Deep State tried anything then: they'd meet with resistance and people were moving through the Constitutional System to reclaim their Rights. 

   This was part of the premise in supporting School Choice on my own part. A lot of us activists truly believed that American parents wanted it; and that it was really only a matter giving them the tools to do it, along with removing Government obstructionism and Corporate hijacking. But as many other issues that surfaced in 2020, we'd realized that we'd been lied to. 

   American parents like to live under the illusion that our society---and themselves in particular---care more about the welfare of children than any other society on earth. Nothing could be further than the truth. Our treatment of children and legal minors is a national disgrace and in fact, both at the familial and social levels we're nearly at the bottom of most developed countries. 

   It's hardly necessary to go over the statistics again. We can see with our own eyes the physical and psychological wreckage that both our homes and society has produced. Even our levels of infant morality and congenital birth-defects has skyrocketed during the last three decades. Look at the very numbers of persons under 18 suffering from chronic obesity, addicted to both prescription and illegal mind-altering drugs, rampant gender dysphoria and other neuroses, massive declines in literacy and knowledge of general facts---I simply can't believe seriously that parents didn't see any of this coming. We still don't know the long-term effects of the Loyalty Vaxx. And what's worse: the recent trend among 'Conservative' families has been to pretend that they didn't realize that it was going on at all. 

    

     When an American child is first conceived, the mother has decisions to make: whether it's 'wanted' or whether it should be disposed of and its tissue sold for hideous medical experiments. Then there's the issue of whether or not the father should be in the picture or not: he's obligated to pay for raising the kid, at least. 

    If an infant is lucky enough to get over the first hurdle and his parents hadn't done enough drugs to impair his health, he gets dumped in a daycare center while the sperm & egg donors carry on as before. At home he gets planted in front of a TV to have perverse children's shows drilled into his head. Then comes the degradation and regimentation of public school where he learns to question his instincts and to obey authority, They're given no spiritual or moral guidance other than Might Makes Right and the number of suicides and nervous breakdowns between the ages of 7-12 have been going up for several years: if he survives that, he learns that such things are only part of the weeding-out process. Merit has nothing to do with success: in fact it's a sign of some shadowy evil known vaguely as 'privilege.' 

  The teen years are likewise devoid of any moral or vocational guidance, and even though Nature is taking its course and they are actually young adults, parents and schools and media influence do their utmost to fight maturity and keep them at childhood levels of dependence. Teenagers whose nature rebels against any of this are either fed with dope until they conform or are turned over to the tender mercies of Child Protective agencies. Most who end up that route never recover from it and end up criminals, junkies, or suicides despite their previous potential as useful citizens. 

  A kid who makes it to this level learns that going along to get along is the wisest (and safest) course of action. A few who are intelligent and amoral enough to understand what it is being done to them get groomed for elite colleges or special training to become leaders in social order. The parents of either group are delighted that their offspring has showed its superiority to the common herd, although that 'magic age' of 18 presents a problem when the young one is booted out of the home to sink or swim on his own. The chosen group however is well taken care of, with a knowing wink and nod. 

  I wonder at this point if any Conservative family-values types are going to say that the above description doesn't fit at least half of the children and minors in his own neighborhood. 

  

   This is (one) reason why I don't believe there's going to be any 'Conservative Comeback' either this year or 2024. Conservatives political leaders can't hold a position on these---and many other---issues without indicting themselves. All that they can do is talk tough and grandstand and make proposals that usually more draconian than what the Left wants to do. I recently heard some GOP nitwit propose that parents who take their children to 'Pride Events' should be investigated by CPS. Great idea: just turn the Secret Police on a different target. Maybe better still: outsource CPS enforcement to thuggish mercenaries like Blackwater or Wackenhut---hey, that's the free market solution! 

   A real Conservative would ban public homo demonstrations and crack down on rogue agencies like CPS, but then they'd have to explain why these abuses have been ignored for so long. Simply re-orienting a corrupt system and changing the personnel would also mean that parents were still absolved from responsibility. Forcing parents to accept the homo agenda being pushed on their kids or jailing parents who teach their kids acceptance of it are equally acts of State oppression in an area where the State has no business being.  

   But to the majority of Americans---Left or Right---there's really little use trying to explain any of this. The minority who get it; the few who are really trying to raise families already are doing what needs to be done. Their best course of action is to network with other like-minded families because mutual support is badly needed now. 2020 showed a lot of us who the phonies really were; and we should beware of fake Conservatives lamenting the current crisis but who offer no alternative. 

  

   

  

MYSTERY MEAT AND PLASTIC BANANAS

   A project funded in part by the intrepid Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to assess the quality of the garbage fed American schoolchildren USDA School Lunch Program published its results this weekend. I think that most of us realize that foods served in public schools is substandard is no surprise (well, except to Conservative and Churchian parents who were doubtless as unaware of school lunch quality as they claim to have been about CRT, and Drag Queen Story Hours). 

  The project's actual findings however were probably worse than most of us suspected. 

    "Of the 43 school items tested, 95.3%, had detectable levels of glyphosate weed killer, the most widely used herbicide in the world, a known carcinogen."

   "100% of the wheat products were positive with glyphosate, averaging 42.09 ng/g."

   "29 different types of pesticides were present in 74% of the school lunches." 

    "Thiabendazole, an immune suppressant, was found in 27.9% of the samples." 

    "Piperonal Butoxide, a developmental toxin that causes birth defects and neurodevelopment disruptions, was in 41% of the samples." 

   "4 veterinary drugs and hormones were found in 9 school lunch samples at levels up to 130.76 ng/g."

   "100% of the school lunch samples contained heavy metals at levels up to 6,293 X higher than the EPA’s maximum levels allowed in drinking water."

   "The majority of the samples was abysmally low in nutrients."

   One is tempted to say that is inexcusable, but that phrase has become more or less the definition of American Public Schools in general. Our schools are rat's-nests of corruption, abject failures in their alleged purposes of educating anybody; bullying, violence, and child-abuse are routinely perpetrated by students and school employees alike, drugs are dished out like candy; perverted social workers and thuggish administrators and faculty rule with an iron fist---in short, they are more like prisons than anything else---and apparently the food is just as bad. That shouldn't be surprising since the Corporate monopolies who provide school lunches also cater to the Prison-Industrial Complex. 

     American parents of today, of course, could care less about any of this. However, this wasn't always the case. When President Truman signed the National School Lunch Act into law in 1946, Corporate profiteers and shady NGOs were actually prohibited from pushing their tentacles into the program. Food was purchased by brokers from the US Department of Agriculture. The restrictions were loosened somewhat in the 1970s and 1980s, but even by the end of the Reagan Administration, only 4% of school districts outsourced to private contractors. 

    Then came the 'deregulation' craze of the 1990s. Clinton/Gore Neoliberalism pushed the 'Private-Public Partnership' philosophy to the hilt---fully aided and abetted by RINOs in control of Congress. Alongside of that came Hillary Clinton's It Takes a Village philosophy of abdicating parental responsibilities---fully aided and abetted by American parents. Since that time, American parents have looked upon the public schools as a subsidized babysitting service. The only debate has been whether or not schools would be run under the privatized Socialist model or the State Socialist model. The recent fusion of 'woke' Corporatism and the Bureaucratic State has resolved that debate for all intents and purposes. 

   Regulatory Capture of the USDA was observed as early as 1997 and since then the School Lunch Program has been wholly under the thumb of Big Agricultural interests. People, for example, like those running the Gates Foundation which is swallowing up American farmland and promoting global depopulation are major donors to USDA programs. Tom Vilsack, the Junta's current Minister of Agriculture, served under Obama and worked as a Big Ag lobbyist during the Trump years. In fact, Vilsack's top political donors are notoriously short of farmers, but dominated by PACs, lobbyists, and real-estate moguls like Warren Buffett, a WEF linchpin and co-chair of the aforementioned Gates Foundation.

   During Obama's term, Vilsack famously championed the use of beef by-products in public schools. Organic Insider notes that Vilsack's other noteworthy policies were:

     Vilsack's nomination by the Junta, incidentally, was supported by 44 Republican Senators.
       

    Today, American school lunch programs are dominated by three supranational Corporate cartels: the Compass Group, Aramark, and Sodexo---two of which are foreign-owned, and all three of which have very dubious reputations. In fact, their catalog of crimes is so blatant that even Wikipedia called them out here, here, and here. The Compass CEO responsible for most of the company's illegal activities died under suspicious circumstances in 2017, but even that hasn't affected their status as an industry leader. Aramark's CEO John Zillmer is on the Board of Directors of the Gates Foundation-funded Ecolab, which in turn is also a major Government contractor.

  All three of these contractors are also heavily tied to US Agribusiness interests, specifically Kraft Foods and Tyson Foods, the latter of which has managed to rack up an ever greater track-record of Corporate malfeasance than the three previously mentioned combined. Tyson is a member of the World Economic Forum, and closely connected politically with the Clinton Family. (One of Tyson's top lobbyists in DC is former Senator Mark Pryor of Arkansas). The Junta's Ambassador to the WEF, John Kerry, and WEF Oligarch Warren Buffett are major stakeholders in Kraft Foods. Republican Senators John Hoeven and Roy Blunt own about a quarter-million dollars in Kraft stock. 

   According to the USDA's own numbers, the food served in 87% of public, non-charter schools in 2014-15 offered branded foods for à la carte purchase during meal times, and vending machines were available in 30% of all schools (including 71% of high schools). It's hardly any accident that childhood obesity rates have skyrocketed since the phony 'deregulation' of the 90s as fast as toxicity levels in school lunches have. 

   As might be expected, the quality of food purchased by contractors is not an especially high priority. In fact, their general practice is to purchase unsalable processed foods which barely meet standards for consumption at pennies on the dollar, and then palm them off on public schools for a fat government subsidy. They will never be held to account for these practices either. Besides their control of the USDA, the 'Big Three' have a sizable battery of Beltway lobbyists---the overwhelming majority of whom are revolving-door former federal officials. 

  Ultimately, though, the responsibility falls upon American parents who have looked the other way and allowed this situation to happen. They can plead ignorance all they want to, but increasing obesity rates and sicknesses---not to mention that their kids probably complained about the food more than once---hardly could have escaped their notice. If they'd paid as much attention to their children's diets as they have checking their stock-returns and the newest strains of recreational drugs, maybe this wouldn't have happened. I feel sad for the children and teens caught in these public-school hells, but for their parents, I feel no sympathy whatsoever. 

   Our public schools are a disaster, and it is another disaster of the American people's own making. It's become impossible anymore to listen to pundits on the Right spouting off about parenting as though their own hypocrisy and duplicity had nothing to do with our failed schools and broken homes. One recalls, during the Scamdemic, it was the Conservatives---not the Liberal Left---who were demanding the loudest to reopen these failed institutions. Recall also at that time, schools were demanding mandatory masking and Loyalty Vaxxes.

  In fact, 2022 election polls show that family and education are not even on Conservative voters' list of priorities. As for the Democrats, the 'right' to kill unborn babies is their top concern. Saving the same lives is a distant third priority among the so-called Right: behind making more money and scapegoating immigrants. Tell us all again that we're the Party of Principle standing for faith, family, and freedom. Even if we could imagine a fair election at this point I don't believe that the Right deserves to win. Those who disregard the welfare of their own families can't be trusted with the welfare of a nation. 

   

   

   

RUSSIA SPIKES BELTWAY POWER-PLAY

   In case one only listens to the Corporate-controlled media and their controlled opposition in the so-called 'Conservative' press, it's been nothing but 24/7 Russia-bashing with our 'Baghdad Bobs' assuring us that Russia is losing the war! With a small Expeditionary Force, Russia has wiped out most of Ukraine's military infrastructure. The squalid Zelensky Regime is only propped up by foreign hardware and mercenaries---money which could have been spent on American infrastructure---but NPCs still want to pretend that our own nation has no problems needing to be addressed. 

  This week, referenda were held across the liberated sectors of Ukraine and in the newly-independent Donbass Republics, which overwhelmingly voted to join Russia as new states. The leadership of the exceptional US went green with envy and in a jealous rage tried unsuccessfully to ram through a UN condemnation of the annexation. After all, the US hasn't admitted a new state in nearly 65 years---in fact we've lost territory since the 1970s. Russia, meanwhile, has admitted seven new states since the 1990s with others eager to join. 

   The annexation means now that these new states are part of Russia, and explains the real reason why President Putin recently activated reserve forces. An attack on these areas now constitutes an attack on Russia. Zelensky desperately begged for immediate inclusion into NATO, but the Biden-Harris Junta slinked away, knowing that Putin has check-mated their territorial ambitions and that, whatever their criminal interests in Ukraine are, World War III is not on the table. It was a brilliant move by Russia; reminiscent of China's closing of the South China Sea which backed down Obama in 2016. 

   In their frustration, the Oligarchs and their media parrots actually accused Russia of stealing the elections: if that isn't some of the worst psychological projection and hypocrisy I don't know what is.

   The so-called 'military experts' who've been predicting Russian defeat since February have no real understanding of military strategy. Pentagon Pride Month, Critical Race Theory, and getting inside deals for the Military-Industrial Complex: that they understand. Their idea of strategy is simply bombing some nation with a military smaller than most of our National Guard units into submission---blasting everything to pieces and gunning down anything that moves---finishing up with thuggish contractors who plunder the resources, enslave the populations to supranational cartels as 'war debt,' and get the Ameroboobs to cheer it all on like a bunch of frat boys at a college homecoming game. 

  In modern military strategy, if one actually intends to liberate a people (like Russia actually does and we pretend to do), one tries to avoid destroying infrastructure and mounting civilian casualties. This why Russian progress has been 'slow' (but effective). We saw this happen in Iraq when the Iraqi Government refused Obama's 'help' in fighting ISIS. Iraqi cities were liberated were reopened in short order with no Beltway strings attached. The same thing happened in Syria: Aleppo was liberated in the summer and by Christmas the city was celebrating the holidays again.

  The actual purpose of the 'Ukraine Crisis' from the Western Regime's standpoint was to isolate Russia, and force the EU countries to buy US and Canadian products at inflated prices. The Deep State's sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline was intended to do exactly that. The second reason is that the so-called 'Russia Threat' provided an excuse to station more US and Canadian troops in Europe to help their puppet-governments control the population---which has been protesting Great Reset policies. And the third reason is to cause price inflation, poverty, and unemployment throughout Europe to punish the populations for said protests. 

    In America, the 'Russian Threat' also provides a useful distraction to an unthinking population, The Left hates Russia for not being 'woke'; the fake Right uses Russia as a foil to complain about 'weakness' in Foreign Policy; and the Corporate Overlords who control both parties hate Russia because Russia won't submit to them. And the Ameroboobs forget about our failed democracy, our contracting economy, rampant crime and drug problems, etc.

  What exactly is this 'Russian Threat?' We're threatened by a country where the Government encourages raising families and going to church. A country that actually enforces laws, keeps the Gay Mafia, religious cults, and organized crime off the streets. A government that doesn't continually lie to the people and is actually respected by a majority of the citizens. A government that enforces drug laws and helps addicts get treatment. A country without corporate looters sucking the life blood out of essential industries. A country with schools that actually educate people and medical facilities that actually cure the sick. A country with a functioning infrastructure, where dams and bridges don't routinely collapse and transportation is actually reliable.

  That is what we're afraid of? In a way, yes. Americans hate Russia because Russia's very existence is a constant reminder of our own failure to uphold the values of Western Civilization. Russia's strength and popularity is a reflection of our weakness and the contemptible sham of 'American Exceptionalism.' Putin understands this better than most Americans do; and has stated that Russia will "follow its own path", rather some 'New World Order' dreamed up international oligarchs. 

   The major turning-point for the NWO scum is now going to have to focus on Europe. Russia's successes and the Great Reset crowd's failures are becoming too obvious and apparent to ignore in Europe. To these NWO types, countries and populations are expendable and much will depend upon how well they can keep Europe under their thumb. My own opinion all along is that they intend to throw the EU and NATO under the bus and reorganize the Anglosphere nations as their foundation for their New Order. Cost-Benefit Analysis are the only terms in which the Fourth Industrial Revolution is premised: Europe is resource-poor and densely populated, hence the Oligarchy likely see the continent as a net loss. 

   Russia, however, offers hope of a revitalized Europe. Russia currently is the only superpower standing tall for Western values of freedom and civilization. European peoples are beginning to awaken to this fact, and like the new Russian states are joining hands with Moscow in the defense of Liberty against neoliberal and neocon Tyranny.