STAKES GO UP IN THE RED SEA

    So our brave xhes in uniform have been celebrating a glorious Victory at Sea this weekend. A cargo ship belonging to the Maersk shipping conglomerate and bound for the Zionist nation was attacked by Yemeni gunboats and damaged, but our frontline heroes responded, sinking three Yemeni vessels and killing ten sailors. The fourth gunboat retreated successfully after returning fire against the Coalition helicopters. Supposedly there were no US casualties, but we have only the Pentagon's word for that. 

   In response to this, what the Media calls "US bases in Syria and Iraq" were attacked by drones and missiles---again supposedly with no casualties. These outposts are actually in both countries illegally, over the objections of both the Syrian and Iraqi Governments. They are run by shady Defense Contractors (otherwise known as 'terrorists' when other countries deploy them) around local oil fields. The US military provides 'security' for them and helps impress local labor to pump oil which is then shipped abroad to Heaven-knows-where by other Contractors. Occasionally, the Pentagon will claim that civilian workers are killed or injured in these attacks---not that they would be using human shields like Hamas supposedly does. 

   Iran announced today that it was dispatching a patrol from the Persian Gulf Fleet also for the purposes of defending the Red Sea; though one would presume that Iranian interests in the region are somewhat different than our Deep State's. 

    The Yemeni Government stated that would not be intimidated, to put it mildly. As we recently predicted here, the warhawks in the American punditocracy are not thinking this through carefully. The prudent course of action would be for the Government to tell shippers to use other routes: but of course that wouldn't be an Alpha move, and, despite having near zero national interest in the Red Sea, the American people need to be prepared to make sacrifices so that Global Corporations' investments are protected and our leaders don't look like wimps.

   In fact, Jolly Old King Chuck---despite having few weapons to work with---nonetheless issued a Royal Ultimatum against Yemen yesterday. In typical British fashion, His Highness' Lord Admiral of the High Seas implied that the British would fight to the last drop of American blood, since he was in the Beltway this weekend impressing upon Generalissimo Austin that Americans would have to participate. Now Britain is already blatantly violating our Monroe Doctrine, but there hasn't been a peep of protest over this from either the Mainstream or Controlled Opposition Media. British warships in the Caribbean apparently don't rise to threat level of Chinese weather balloons.

   If Americans could actually find the Red Sea on a world map, they might ask themselves why our Navy is there at all, and what they are defending. One would think that with the amount of narcotics being smuggled in by sea or the decrepit condition of our own ports, and inland waterways, our Navy would be put to better use in the United States. The answer won't be hard to find if we look at the shipping company that our Navy defended yesterday.

   The vessel attacked by Yemen belongs to a Danish shipping company, A.P. Moeller-Maersk. Maersk is a US Government contractor supplying the Pentagon's forces abroad, among other things. Why our own Navy isn't doing this, we don't know; but what we do know is that Maersk was fined for price gouging the Pentagon in 2012 and caught again in 2014 committing fraud in defense contracts. Maersk has also been caught violating sanctions; as well as retaliating against whistleblowers. However, not many objections will be raised, since they have a significant lobbying presence inside the Beltway, most of whom are Revolving-Door former Federal bureaucrats. 

   The former CEO of Maersk, Jim Hagemann Snabe is now CEO of WEF Top 100 Strategic Partner, the Siemens Corporation, Snabe is also a member of the WEF Board of Trustees, along with Bush-Machine apparatchik David Rubenstein. Rubenstein is involved with the Carlyle Group which is heavily invested in major ports worldwide. The current Maersk CEO, Soren Skou, is a WEF Agenda Contributor. Thomas Thune Andersen, another former Maersk executive, is now a Board member of WEF Board of Trustee Member Marc Benioff's NGO which is trying to exert control over the world's oceans. 

  Lloyd Austin himself formerly worked for government contractors Raytheon and Nucor; as well as the heavily-WEF connected Pine Island Capital Partners. I think that we can all draw our conclusions about whose interests the US Navy is defending against those big meanies in Yemen. Incidentally, former Republican Senators Byron Dorgan, Saxby Chambliss, and Don Nickles are also connected to Pine Island, which might go a long way to explaining why so many in GOP also favor a robust response. 

   Isn't it a remarkable coincidence how all of these 'crises' always seem to lead back to the same people?

   Before these idiots manage to start World War III in the Middle East---probably more by their own arrogance and stupidity than by actual design---we Americans really need to start asking ourselves who's telling that we have vital interests there and why.