OF CORNBALLS AND CORONATIONS

       This weekend, the entire Anglosphere is agog over Chuck Mountbatten's Official  Coronation as High Imperial Potentate of the English-Speaking World by God's Grace or some other nonsense. Our nominal Head-of-State sent his spouse along with Chuck's WEF partner John Kerry to attend, as well as a couple of Hollywood figures from American Idol to perform. WEF Young Global Leaders Emmanuel Macron and Tiananmen Trudeau also dropped by. 

     As at the time his mom died, Chuck's ascension to the Royal Throne met with some protesters who were viciously beaten and hauled off to jail by uniformed thugs. Charles' treatment of protesters hasn't quite reached the levels of Trudeau and Macron yet; but at least he's showing a determination to uphold 21st-Century standards of intolerance towards Free Speech. 

    I think that most regular readers already know my feelings towards 'kings'. The only 'coronation' that most of these Royal Majesties deserve is done with a good 18-inch steel blade. That aside, however, today's spectacle falls a week ahead of another of the West's now-meaningless shows: Birthing Persons 'Mothers' Day. But I'll bet there's one famous mom that nobody will be talking about:

     Diana Spencer---for those who graduated high school since the 21st began---was King Chuck's first wife. The Anglosphere media vermin made a huge deal out of the Royal Wedding; portraying it as a fairy-tale romance of sorts. The reality of course was much different. Diana was a shy, sheltered, and impressionable 19-year old at the time of her marriage; the daughter of a deeply dysfunctional family of minor aristocracy which barely held on to its titles because of generations of slavish fawning to Buckingham Palace. Charles married her mostly for political reasons: he needed a 'royal heir' as Papa and Mama Mountbatten were getting along in years, and Diana was the only eligible candidate in British aristocratic circles who was naive enough not to know of his character and avoid him. 

    Charles managed to generate enough testosterone to sire two kinglets, but the marriage wasn't a happy one for Diana. Despite being born into an inbred family and her sheltered upbringing, Diana nonetheless grew into an attractive, reasonably intelligent, and genuinely good-hearted woman. It wasn't long before she was disgusted with her husband's boorishness, latent homosexuality, habitual duplicity, and---above all it seemed---his refusal to do anything to protect her from the rapacity of the British tabloid press. Diana was not at all by nature a person who craved publicity and the constant hounding of the British Media literally drove her nearly insane. 

   Diana finally divorced Chuck---prince or no prince---and left the country in 1996. The following year, she died under highly suspicious circumstances after a car accident in Paris. Even polls today show that nearly 2/5 of Britons don't believe the Official Narrative of an accidental death. The fact that the Royal Inquest was literally prohibited from returning a verdict of Murder certainly raised questions about the transparency of the investigation. Even that rigged jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing (whatever that means) and the British Establishment Media has since dropped any discussion of the subject like a hot potato. A 2011 documentary titled Unlawful Killing was banned throughout the British Commonwealth and shadow-banned by American media distribution cartels. 

  Among other anomalies, she was taken from car alive but injured and not sent to the hospital for another 40 minutes and the ambulance drove her there at the speed of about 25 MPH. CCTV footage of the crash was confiscated and it was later revealed that the Royal Terrorist organization British Intelligence Service was spying on Diana up to the moment of the alleged accident. A French inquest concluded that the car Diana was riding in collided with another vehicle in the tunnel, but the other car or driver have never been found. It was also concluded that Diana's chauffeur was legally intoxicated although the report likewise has disappeared. 

   Before her divorce and subsequent death, Charles was gaslighting Diana aggressively; and she confided to her servants that she believed that he intended to have her murdered or committed to an insane asylum. The servants were called to testify at the Inquest, but no doubt being warned of the consequences, deferred the matter to Diana's attorney, who was also a nobleman. The attorney gave testimony to Scotland Yard, which dismissed it as 'unsubstantiated.' A few years later, however, the attorney discovered a hand-written note among Diana's effects which specifically mentioned "arranging a car accident." Richard Tomlinson, a whistleblower who was thrown in jail by Tony Blair for exposing the British Government's crimes, stated that  "he knew for a fact that her driver on the night she died, Henri Paul, was an MI6 informant. He claimed that her death mirrored plans he saw in 1992 for the assassination of Yugoslav President Milosevic using a bright light to cause a traffic accident."

   Charles went on to marry the more mannish and domineering Camilla Ferguson---evidently a match more to his tastes. But I certainly have doubts that if one of us little people had abused his spouse to the degree that Charles did, and she died in a suspicious accident shortly after the divorce, any of us would have gotten media and police to look the other way to the extent that these Royals managed to do. As if this wasn't bad enough, being a known spousal abuser and suspected killer is only a fraction of Charles' suspected crimes. 

      The postmodern sycophants of British Royalty can hoot all they want to; let's see how hard they laugh when this fiend really starts flexing his royal muscles. 

    "So what do we do? Without doubt we must now put ourselves on a war-like footing, approaching our action from the perspective of a military-style campaign. That way, working together we can combat this most grave and urgent challenge. If we have the resolve to shift our trajectory we must start now, by bringing forward our net zero target.”---Charles, commenting on the Great Reset at the 2020 WEF Forum. For a comprehensive look at all of the other pies that Charles has his fingers in, this article is one of the most thorough. 

   It is truly a sad commentary on the state of our culture when we actually admire crowned degenerates like this. I wish that I could say that it was a uniquely Leftist phenomenon, but unfortunately there's no shortage of meatheads on the so-called Right who like the idea of bringing kings back (naturally of course they would be the aristocracy). As far as I'm concerned, they're all a bunch of throwbacks to same kinds of Tory scum that our Founding Fathers had to deal with. Authoritarianism, whatever its stripe, is not a step forward.