OF CORNBALLS AND CORONATIONS

       This weekend, the entire Anglosphere is agog over Chuck Mountbatten's Official  Coronation as High Imperial Potentate of the English-Speaking World by God's Grace or some other nonsense. Our nominal Head-of-State sent his spouse along with Chuck's WEF partner John Kerry to attend, as well as a couple of Hollywood figures from American Idol to perform. WEF Young Global Leaders Emmanuel Macron and Tiananmen Trudeau also dropped by. 

     As at the time his mom died, Chuck's ascension to the Royal Throne met with some protesters who were viciously beaten and hauled off to jail by uniformed thugs. Charles' treatment of protesters hasn't quite reached the levels of Trudeau and Macron yet; but at least he's showing a determination to uphold 21st-Century standards of intolerance towards Free Speech. 

    I think that most regular readers already know my feelings towards 'kings'. The only 'coronation' that most of these Royal Majesties deserve is done with a good 18-inch steel blade. That aside, however, today's spectacle falls a week ahead of another of the West's now-meaningless shows: Birthing Persons 'Mothers' Day. But I'll bet there's one famous mom that nobody will be talking about:

     Diana Spencer---for those who graduated high school since the 21st began---was King Chuck's first wife. The Anglosphere media vermin made a huge deal out of the Royal Wedding; portraying it as a fairy-tale romance of sorts. The reality of course was much different. Diana was a shy, sheltered, and impressionable 19-year old at the time of her marriage; the daughter of a deeply dysfunctional family of minor aristocracy which barely held on to its titles because of generations of slavish fawning to Buckingham Palace. Charles married her mostly for political reasons: he needed a 'royal heir' as Papa and Mama Mountbatten were getting along in years, and Diana was the only eligible candidate in British aristocratic circles who was naive enough not to know of his character and avoid him. 

    Charles managed to generate enough testosterone to sire two kinglets, but the marriage wasn't a happy one for Diana. Despite being born into an inbred family and her sheltered upbringing, Diana nonetheless grew into an attractive, reasonably intelligent, and genuinely good-hearted woman. It wasn't long before she was disgusted with her husband's boorishness, latent homosexuality, habitual duplicity, and---above all it seemed---his refusal to do anything to protect her from the rapacity of the British tabloid press. Diana was not at all by nature a person who craved publicity and the constant hounding of the British Media literally drove her nearly insane. 

   Diana finally divorced Chuck---prince or no prince---and left the country in 1996. The following year, she died under highly suspicious circumstances after a car accident in Paris. Even polls today show that nearly 2/5 of Britons don't believe the Official Narrative of an accidental death. The fact that the Royal Inquest was literally prohibited from returning a verdict of Murder certainly raised questions about the transparency of the investigation. Even that rigged jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing (whatever that means) and the British Establishment Media has since dropped any discussion of the subject like a hot potato. A 2011 documentary titled Unlawful Killing was banned throughout the British Commonwealth and shadow-banned by American media distribution cartels. 

  Among other anomalies, she was taken from car alive but injured and not sent to the hospital for another 40 minutes and the ambulance drove her there at the speed of about 25 MPH. CCTV footage of the crash was confiscated and it was later revealed that the Royal Terrorist organization British Intelligence Service was spying on Diana up to the moment of the alleged accident. A French inquest concluded that the car Diana was riding in collided with another vehicle in the tunnel, but the other car or driver have never been found. It was also concluded that Diana's chauffeur was legally intoxicated although the report likewise has disappeared. 

   Before her divorce and subsequent death, Charles was gaslighting Diana aggressively; and she confided to her servants that she believed that he intended to have her murdered or committed to an insane asylum. The servants were called to testify at the Inquest, but no doubt being warned of the consequences, deferred the matter to Diana's attorney, who was also a nobleman. The attorney gave testimony to Scotland Yard, which dismissed it as 'unsubstantiated.' A few years later, however, the attorney discovered a hand-written note among Diana's effects which specifically mentioned "arranging a car accident." Richard Tomlinson, a whistleblower who was thrown in jail by Tony Blair for exposing the British Government's crimes, stated that  "he knew for a fact that her driver on the night she died, Henri Paul, was an MI6 informant. He claimed that her death mirrored plans he saw in 1992 for the assassination of Yugoslav President Milosevic using a bright light to cause a traffic accident."

   Charles went on to marry the more mannish and domineering Camilla Ferguson---evidently a match more to his tastes. But I certainly have doubts that if one of us little people had abused his spouse to the degree that Charles did, and she died in a suspicious accident shortly after the divorce, any of us would have gotten media and police to look the other way to the extent that these Royals managed to do. As if this wasn't bad enough, being a known spousal abuser and suspected killer is only a fraction of Charles' suspected crimes. 

      The postmodern sycophants of British Royalty can hoot all they want to; let's see how hard they laugh when this fiend really starts flexing his royal muscles. 

    "So what do we do? Without doubt we must now put ourselves on a war-like footing, approaching our action from the perspective of a military-style campaign. That way, working together we can combat this most grave and urgent challenge. If we have the resolve to shift our trajectory we must start now, by bringing forward our net zero target.”---Charles, commenting on the Great Reset at the 2020 WEF Forum. For a comprehensive look at all of the other pies that Charles has his fingers in, this article is one of the most thorough. 

   It is truly a sad commentary on the state of our culture when we actually admire crowned degenerates like this. I wish that I could say that it was a uniquely Leftist phenomenon, but unfortunately there's no shortage of meatheads on the so-called Right who like the idea of bringing kings back (naturally of course they would be the aristocracy). As far as I'm concerned, they're all a bunch of throwbacks to same kinds of Tory scum that our Founding Fathers had to deal with. Authoritarianism, whatever its stripe, is not a step forward.

   

   

   

I HATE THE MEDIA

      Donald Trump, the President-in-Exile, once said that the American News Media is a "national disgrace." It truly is that. The overwhelming majority of the news outlets today are so completely under the thumb of Corporate special interests whose relationship with lawmakers and regulators is so seamless that we may as well have a State Ministry of Propaganda and Culture. Like our elections, however, the Oligarchy prefers maintaining an illusion of choice; even offering us Controlled Opposition outlets. There really is no choice. Just as our last 'Red Wave' Congress gifted Obama with a repeal of the Anti-Propaganda Act of 1948; our current crop of RINOs is working overtime to hand the Biden/Harris Junta the so-called Restrict Act to control our sources of information even further. 

    The main purpose of the contemporary American Media is to create distraction, spread propaganda, and sow fear and division. Yes, there are occasionally accurate stories in the press: I'm certain that even during the Third Reich one could get reliable information about road conditions, weather forecasts, and sports scores. But they also got an agenda sold to them and that's essentially what we get too. Basically, what today's news comes down to is marketing; selling ideas that increase the power and profit of those interests controlling the press. 

   The Media's coverage of crime stories is a case in point of how subtly this agenda-promotion is played out. "If it bleeds, it leads," the motto of cynical editors everywhere, gives Americans the impression that violent crime is ubiquitous---even though by the UN's own numbers, only two US cities even make the list of top 25 most violent cities. That's not to say that crime isn't a problem in the US; but mostly our problems stem from the less-glamorous violent bum jungles and organized gangs committing property crimes and assaults (which our politicians of both parties do nothing about); and that suicides and narcotics overdoses are responsible for most of the non-natural or non-disease related deaths here. The Whacko Left Wing's response is to defund the police and legalize vagrancy, euthanasia, and drugs: the Right's response is to pretend that such problems only happen in 'Blue States.' 

   The Mainstream Media also makes it a point to bury details of stories when they reflect badly on the Junta's constituents. We've all seen it: whenever some horrific crime is perpetrated by a minority, his identity is withheld until trolls have flooded every comment section blaming it on a white male Christian Trump-supporter. When a White does commit it; they post his picture but censor the Internet of all of his social media accounts---because the majority of the time, it's some Left-Wing kook or homo activist responsible. The trolls achieve the same effect.

   Lately the MSM has been running the same interference for the Gay Mafia. The fact that that demographic has throughout history has had disproportional representation among violent criminals (especially towards women and children) is why dead White males considered it an antisocial mental disorder. The Media would just as soon that we forgot some of that science and passively accept the New Normal. 

   A case in point happened in Connecticut lately. In spite of considerable bumbling from local law enforcement, one of America's longest-standing unidentified homicide victims got her name back; thanks largely to the efforts of her sister who had been searching for her missing sibling.

   The MSM story concluded by saying that "investigators are still searching for Patricia Newsom’s killer." What they conveniently leave out is that they've had a suspect since her body was found in 1975: a convicted killer named Glenn Askeborn who died in prison last year. There was considerable circumstantial evidence tying Askeborn to the crime; and since Patricia has been identified, even more corroborating evidence has surfaced. This BTW, includes the recent discovery that Patricia ran away from a girls' home with a friend---whose identity and current whereabouts are also unknown.  

   Why did Askeborn's name drop from the story? Well, it happens that he was an out and proud member of the LGBTQ Community. He was in fact a troon who disguised as a female and went by the name of 'Samantha Glenner.' Just like the recent transsexual Nashville shooter---whose 'manifesto' has never been made public---certain interests would rather sweep such details under the rug. 

   Disgusting as this kind of journalistic chicanery is, it's certainly not the first time that editors (and even police agencies) have scrambled all of their resources to keep any mention of 'orientation' out of the official story. In fact, it's not even the first time it's happened in a high-profile Cold Case. 

   When discussing the MSM, we're probably not telling anybody anything new. Leftist activists are always going to do what they habitually do: stoop to the lowest levels to promote their sick agendas. However, this brings us to a real problem.

   What about the 'Conservative' Media?

    Yesterday, most of my newsfeed was flooded with story after story about the horrible mass-murder in San Jacinto, Texas. It's not that it wasn't a major news story: the troubling thing from my perspective was that nearly every headline from a 'Conservative' source took great pains to point out that the suspect was an immigrant. In fact, just like the Liberal Media goes out of its way to magnify any incident of criminality committed by anyone even tangentially connected to the political Right while downplaying any criminality among their own base; it seems that the Controlled Opposition 'Conservative' Press has adopted the same tactic. The San Jacinto Case is an extreme example, but it's not at all uncommon that any crime committed by an immigrant makes the news on the Right, in spite of the fact that the native-born population far exceeds immigrants in terms of criminal behavior. 

   Texas Governor Greg Abbott, whose subservience to the Alt-Right agenda is so pronounced that he's recently offered a pardon to a convicted murderer upon demands from that sector, recently threw further gasoline on the fire by bringing both the victims' and the suspect's immigration status into the debate. How is this any different from the Left's exploitation of violence to agitate for gun control?

    The sad fact is that it's no different. Those of us who grew up in the Reagan Era may recall that the Conservative Media of the day once consisted of erudite and dignified figures like William F. Buckley, Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, and Louis Rukeyser who challenged the fallacies of the Left in open debate and routinely toppled their arguments. In spite of a hostile news media during the 1980s, Ronald Reagan managed to carry 45 and 49 states respectively in two elections. He didn't accomplish this by trying to own the libtards by mimicking their sleazy behavior; nor by pandering to whack-jobs who think that they're part of a super-race and that White Sharia is an acceptable form of government. 

    Unfortunately, too, trying to explain any of this to the Postmodern NPC Right is about as fruitless as trying to explain the stupidity of Left-Wing pundits to an average Liberal. I know, I've tried. Gauge the intelligence and general character of the 21st Century Right by these kinds of responses:

    

   We're reading in 'thoughts' like these the end result of years of dumbing-down the Conservative Media to the level of the Liberal MSM. If they actually had any sort of education, they would realize that the aforementioned President Reagan signed an Amnesty Law into effect in 1987. "In many ways, amnesty was a success story — it gave millions of people the legal status they required to have a better life. It even turned a $100 million profit for the government (through the fees it charged applicants). And while immigration restrictionists still claim that amnesty encouraged more undocumented immigrants to come, studies show the opposite: amnesty produced a decline in the number of illegal entries into the country."

    "Studies show that those who legalized saw their wages go up by 20%, they were also more likely to get a higher education and become homeowners," according to a follow-up survey done by the El Paso Times.

   Republican Senator Alan Simpson, who sponsored the legislation, wrote: “The work to be done is to avoid seeing this nation populated with a furtive illegal subclass of human beings who are afraid to go to the cops, afraid to go to a hospital…or afraid to go to their employer. If we do not choose to have immigration reform in the near future, the alternative will not just be the status quo. No, the alternative instead will be an increased public intolerance — a failure of compassion, if you will — toward all forms of immigration and types of entrants.” Imagine a Republican Senator saying anything like that today. But that's what Conservatism used to sound like.

   This is why the Conservative movement of today is failing. Both in its methods and its message, it has become indistinguishable from the Far Left; except that the Right seems to aspire to be more ruthlessly vicious rulers and more accomplished liars than their so-called opposition. “When it comes to the most important things in life, you should toss civility aside and fight for what’s right with everything you have,” as Rabbi Dr. Ari Lamm, another yo-yo who passes for an intellectual among today's Right, opined in the Moonie-run media outlet, Newsweek. Well, we see how well that strategy has worked since Reagan's time. 

   

    

   

WAKING THE DEAD

    The collection of scum who pass themselves off today as America's Academic Elite have a new problem in the hard sciences. No, it's not a system riddled with corruption at all levels--- like pervasive ghostwriting, legislative bribery, revolving-door lobbying, pay-to-play schemes, corporate hijacking of institutions, or mercenary scientists selling their credentials to the highest bidder. Instead, like Dark-Age witch doctors---modern Academia is moving to impose woke ideology upon the dead.

   "As soon as ancient human remains are excavated, archaeologists begin the work of determining a number of traits about the individual, including age, race and gender. But a new school of thought within archaeology is pushing scientists to think twice about assigning gender to ancient human remains. It is possible to determine whether a skeleton is from a biological male or female using objective observations based on the size and shape of the bones. Criminal forensic detectives, for example, do it frequently in their line of work. But gender activists argue scientists cannot know how an ancient individual identified themselves."

   It ought to be comforting to American taxpayers---who uncritically dump billions of tax dollars and bloated tuition costs annually into the hands of these swindlers, are paying to insure that skeletons aren't offended by how they are 'labelled.' What a great leap forward in human progress. It wasn't that many centuries ago, after all, when the settled science assured us that the recitation of certain magic formulas could animate a corpse or bring its dead spirit to life and do the bidding of a witch or sorcerer. A few years ago, we would laugh at such notions, but it would have been a brave man who laughed at it in the 16th Century. And sadly, today the situation isn't that much different than it was 400 years ago. 

     The modern Scientism-Mania not only has impacted Archaeology. it's broken out in the field of Forensic Science as well. "A group called the Trans Doe Task Force seeks to explore ways in which current standards in forensic human identification do a disservice to people who do not clearly fit the gender binary. The group’s mission statement proposes a gender-expansive approach to human identification by examining found bodies based on contextual clues such as clothing culturally coded to a gender other than their assigned sex.” University of Kansas Professor Jennifer Raff---one of the ringleaders of this pressure group movement stated that "there are no neat divisions between physically or genetically male or female individuals. Identifying remains only as either male or female is a duality concept imposed by Christian colonizers."

    It shouldn't be surprising that such an initiative would come from the University of Kansas; which has a nationwide reputation as one of the most repressive of 'woke' university environments. It's chancellor, Doug Girod is a shady character with ties to the Fauci-run NIH and the US Navy's medical research programs. Girod ascended this position in 2017, replacing retiring Bernadette Gray-Little, a former UNC bureaucrat under whom UNC became the 10th largest recipient of NIH money and became part of the Big Tech-funded 'North Carolina Research Triangle.' The current Provost is Barbara Bichelmeyer, an open Lesbian who also formerly served as a 'consultant' to the US Navy and the American Bar Association. About half of Kansas' budget is currently provided by (largely unspecified) interest groups.

      
    In 2018, Kansas was at the center of lawsuit after suspending students for social media posts. The Courts sided with the University and now academic inquisitors routinely hunt for those running afoul of the official orthodoxy. In 2019, the University found itself listed as one of The Ten Worst Colleges for Free Speech. The University has an established track-record for threatening journalists, and recently has proposed a policy making academic purges easier. 

   Now being located in a deeply Red State, we're to presume that the very Conservative parents, voters, taxpayers, and legislators had absolutely no idea that any of this was going on. It may be true, given the citizenry's rates of narcotics consumption and abuse; but at least now when Kansasans overdose, they won't have to worry about being misgendered when their corpses are recovered. 

   There has, of course, never been the slightest shred of scientific evidence that gender is merely an artificial social construct, and probably millions of documents proving that it is not. That doesn't stop official promotion of the idea because it is in line with agendas of certain interest groups which desire to cultivate loyalty to institutions outside of the concepts of family, nation, and civilization. One such fact which is beyond any doubt is the relationship of homosexuality to acceptance of authoritarian ideologies and institutions. Dutch psychologist Joost Meerloo observed that:

 "When there is no father figure, or if the father is too weak or too busy or is denying and tyrannical toward the child, the result is that the child's relationship with and dependence on the mother remains strong and lasts too long. Consequently, the child's need for social participation and for gregarious ties with others may become to him a consuming need. As an adult he may be willing to join with any social group which promises him support and reassurance. Or his unconscious resentment against the father who did not help him to grow up and become independent may be diverted into a resentment against other symbols of authority, such as society itself. Either way the child may be headed for maladjustment and for difficulties. Either way the child may grow up into an immature adult. In a study on living by proxy, I described the arrested emotional development that results when the father does not play his proper role or is not present. A child brought up in such an emotionally defective atmosphere searches continually for strong figures who may serve as a proxy for the normal relationships the child would otherwise have had in life. I have treated several cases of homosexuality and other forms of arrested development, both in men and women, which were almost directly attributable to the too strongly tied, symbiotic life with the mother which results from such an environment."

   The homosexual never reaches the point of maturity where love and commitment to the opposite sex is consummated; hence he lives at a point of continually childish frustration and bound by group-loyalty and the continual search for an authority-figure. The breakdown of the traditional family with the father as provider and forcing gender-boundaries in society is a related program. Under such conditions, loyalty to the institution supplants loyalty to family and Corporate interests certainly prefer paying wages that could support an individual over supporting a family. 

  Sadly, though, explaining any of this to the average Ameroboob today is an exercise in futility, since most seem to prefer a blissful ignorance of drugs and denial---and above all, not questioning the settled science on anything. Meanwhile, the purveyors of this cultural rot sow more damage and destruction and laugh all the way to the bank.

     

SOMETIMES WE NEED TO REMEMBER

      Sometimes we just need a reminder that humanity is still capable of good. Five months after the victim of one the nation's most notorious cold cases was identified, a new headstone was unveiled and a memorial service was held at Oakwood Cemetery in Huntsville, Texas on Wednesday. 

      Another service was held in Corpus Christi:

      The person(s) responsible for this crime are still unknown. The FBI apparently now has jurisdiction over the case since Sherri was from out-of-state and legally a minor. There was some official talk of a Person of Interest a few months ago, but nothing has come out since. We know that the day she ran away she went to Green Bay, Wisconsin; afterwards to Denver, Colorado; and then (probably) to Aransas Pass, Texas. At this point, there is not enough information publicly available even to make an educated guess as to who killed her or even why she happened to come to Huntsville. I'm sure that we'll know more in the upcoming months as the FBI interviews people and traces her whereabouts. 

     As a side note for those interested, much of the earlier research we'd done trying to locate the (then known as) WCJD has been passed on to the authorities because it seems to fit another case of a missing girl who was widely believed to have been WCJD:

   

  Any updates that come from that case, we'll keep readers posted too. And thank you again to everyone who helped bring some resolution to this.

      

SHE'S 'WALKER COUNTY JANE DOE' NO MORE

       This morning, KBTX-3 gave a press conference announcing that case we've discussed here on many occasions has been given a major update. Officials from the FBI, the Texas Rangers, a DNA testing lab, and a visibly humbled Walker County Sheriff's Department gave a live conference---the first in 41 years---confirming that the 1980 murder victim known as 'Walker County Jane Doe' has been identified.

     Her name is Sherri Ann Jarvis, born on the 9th of March 1966; and she was from Stillwater, Minnesota. Apparently the reason that the family hadn't released information sooner is because her parents are both deceased and it was a matter of getting her five siblings together to deal with the situation. According to one source, they are in the process of ordering a new headstone, though she will remain at Oakwood Cemetery in Huntsville. 

    A statement from the family read at the Press Conference said that Sherri "loved children, animals, and horseback riding." She disappeared at the age of 13; though they didn't provide an exact date, it was likely in the Fall of 1979. At the time she left, she'd been placed in a girl's home for Truancy. According to Sherri's brother, Don, "she ran away from home several times and would skip school a lot also. Of the 6 of us kids at home she was the only one doing this. She hung out with the wrong kids at school; that's what started this." Over the years, her parents hired private investigators to locate her and even kept the same phone number in hopes that she would call. 

   As to why she was in Texas, no one knows at this point---or at least no one has come forward and said. The family has no connections to Texas. The last person to see her alive stated that she was dressed in everyday clothes and the autopsy showed that she had no signs of malnutrition and was well-cared for. There was no mention of narcotics in her system. It's evident that she wasn't living out on the streets. 

  The last witness said that she asked for directions to Ellis Unit of the Huntsville Prison System (located on SR-980). The FBI official stated at the Press Conference that an exhaustive check of former inmates there came up with nothing. Also, I've been informed by people around Huntsville that 980 is heavily patrolled; indicating that she never got that far. I've always believed---and still do---that the crime took place inside Huntsville somewhere. The facts around the murder invariably point back to somebody knowing, but not saying anything. 

  One of the officials at the press conference (the Texas Ranger IIRC), said that the murder was compared to other crimes. Just a hypothesis, but it sounds as though they may suspect a serial killer. 

  Another possibility is that this may have been the work of a Satanic Cult---and there lots of those in that the part of the country. Halloween Night is a high ritual night to these fools; typically they offer an animal sacrifice, but human ones aren't unheard-of. Supposedly a human sacrifice increases their powers, or whatever. Sherri's body was found around 6 A.M. on November 1st; the Coroner estimated that she'd been dead about three hours. 3 A.M. is the hour in which these hideous rituals are usually consummated, and ligature strangulation is the most common way they dispatch their victims. A few years ago, the FBI published a manual on Satanic Cults which states that on the 31st, "Attempts are made to break to the bonds holding the closed door to the Underworld, they are marked by letting of blood (i.e. such as could be occasioned by biting) and sexual association with demons. (hence the use of a blunt object in a sexual assault). This carries into November 1st, 'The High Unholy Day' when human sacrifice is [often] carried out." 

   We'll probably have more to say of these matters later as more information comes out. For now, though we'll thank everyone who helped give WCJD her name back and bring this case to a conclusion against some very formidable obstacles. 

   

BULLIES, SLIMY TALK-SHOW HOSTS, CYBER-BULLIES, AND SOCIAL MEDIA TROLLS

     So, I took a short vacation from blogging; but will be back fairly soon. The breaking WCJD news and the end of White Boy Summer seemed a good time for a respite. There hasn't been any updates on WCJD yet, we'll keep following the story, though. One thing that's been clarified is the timeline has to when everyone was notified. As we now now, WCJD was identified months ago but her parents have asked for privacy. Carl Koppleman said on the FB page yesterday that the parents weren't notified until shortly before we were. I should have suspected that when he said in the initial report that "not all of her relatives have been notified."

    It's not normal police procedure to postpone notifying the family like that; but---well, let's just say that there was a reason why we were attempting to get the Investigative Jurisdiction changed. Maybe in hindsight, our post before the announcement had an impact after all?

  WCSO Deputy: "Hey Boss! This guy just said that he was going to take us to Court!"

  WCSO Sheriff: "Oh, that's right! We haven't notified anybody yet. Better get on that today. Hyuk-hyuk-hyuk-hyuk." 

   Ahhhhh...Just the thought of never dealing with those people again makes me want to take another vacation. 

  Unfortunately, the same can't be said for Social Media trolls. There are other stories besides WCJD's that we're involved in; and stories like these seem to attract people like that. I haven't closely followed the Gabby Petito Case, but if you read the MSM, you can't escape it. To sort of summarize: Gabrielle Petito and Brian Laundrie were a couple of Zoomers who decided---without much forethought---to take a roadtrip from Florida to someplace. The trip was fraught with a lot of drama and finally ended up in the Grand Tetons when Laundrie returned home minus the damsel. He disappeared shortly thereafter himself, and Gabrielle was found deceased in the mountains.

 That's as much as we actually know; but that hasn't stopped armies of Cyber Bullies from jumping into the whole situation and disrupting things as much as possible. They're even pushing Gabby Petito merch; they'd surrounded and besieged the home of Brian Laundrie's parents; tying up police resources; getting into fights with the neighbors; and at last report were marching on his grandparents' home in North Carolina. That ridiculous character Dog the Bounty Hunter has even grabbed a spotlight and it's all very shameful that this happens. We're not talking about nice people here. 

   It's just an unfortunate fact of our postmodern Culture that there's no good way to deal with these people if you're unlucky enough to get on their radar screens. In the pre-Internet days, they were there too; it's just that editors and producers in the Legacy Media back then knew who the cranks were and could filter them out. Today, they can form their own communities and go on the offensive. If you try to ignore them, they get louder; if you confront them, they get encouraged. Humor seems to work against them with some effect, since that's a character trait that most trolls lack; but again, in some situations, humor isn't an appropriate response either. 

  I only that WCJD's family isn't discouraged from disclosure because of some of the online treatment their daughter received. Not all of us were like that, there were people who cared for her gravesite; worked on the case, and volunteered their talents, like Carl, by making new composites at their own time and expense. Others even took personal risks; tips came in, for example and her killer(s) have never been found---those people could be reading those very tips and take a dislike to someone saying things too close to the truth. 

 Friend of our blog, vlogger and novelist Bjorn Bull-Hansen posted a 15-minute video recently on the subject of Cyber Bullies and it's worth watching. 

WALKER COUNTY JANE DOE, PART 2

     So, after we posted our last update on Thursday regarding this case, about 24 hours later, case was reported to the National Unidentified and Missing Persons System (NAMUS) as 'resolved.' WCSO hasn't given any details whatsoever; but Carl Koppleman, who volunteers with the Doe Network and has been a leader in this case said that he had spoken with the victim's family. She wasn't from Texas, according to his source; but he hasn't so far seen a photo. He further said that she had been reported missing but her details were never uploaded to national databases. 

     Like nearly everybody else, I hope that WCJD has been identified. But I would like to caution everyone involved and remind them of one important thing: we are living in an era where it's become easy for authorities to make assertions, then tell us it's 'settled science', then tell us there's no further discussion on the subject. If things start shaping up like that; then this case is not over. WCSO is going to have to prove this. Otherwise, we're going to continue as though today didn't happen. 

   Despite what some of the trolls mentioned on Thursday's post are saying, we actually have been wrong before, and will admit it if it turns out to be true. I don't especially care who solves the case as long as it gets done. Not all opinions will change though: I still think that WCSO is a pack of scum and that the trolls who hang out on 'Internet Sleuth' forums are complete losers. 

   My advice to everyone---and I'm going to follow this myself---wait and see what comes out officially and think about what you've been told. Like we mentioned in Thursday's post, most police departments treat these kinds of cases like the two others we mentioned: they're either grateful for the help and act on what you give them; or they're indifferent and tell you to go work harder. Agencies like WCSO, who build a wall of secrecy and discourage help are not typical and it's a huge Red Flag when one encounters it. In spite of their announcement today, that Flag is still flying. 

   So barring any breaking news, we're taking a slight hiatus from proceeding with the case, until more information comes in. 

WALKER COUNTY JANE DOE UPDATE AND SOME COMMENT

     It's been some time since we've given an update on this story, but one of our contributors has pointed out that the few people still concerned about this case have been asking for updates. Admittedly, the hysteria around the so-called 'Pandemic' and the general political and social upheaval have slowed research down considerably, but it's still ongoing. We've been getting some more information coming in: and that is another main reason for posting these occasional updates, to encourage people to come forward. Unlike the Walker County Sheriff's Office, we don't disregard tips; nor do we berate, intimidate or threaten people who provide them---as we've heard now from several sources that WCSO does. 

   In fact, during the last few months we've spoken to some who've given tips to WCSO and they've helped move things forward in spite of the obstacles. One man living near Huntsville who remembered seeing her and a woman from Aransas Pass who knew of her have given us a fairly good idea as to who she might have been. The current difficulty gaining access to both archival resources and travel have made obtaining some vital evidence hard to obtain; but once we've secured it and it matches, we'll make her name public. What we can say for now is that it looks now like at least one of the tips that Carl Koppelman posted on his WCJD Facebook page from 2015-2018 was right after all, and maybe even some others despite the apparent contradictions in what the witnesses remembered after 40 or so years. 

   I hope that this latest information will bear some fruit, not only so that WCJD can finally get her name back, but all those well-intentioned people who tried to provide help and suffered browbeating from WCSO and ridicule from brigades of online trolls will be vindicated. As for identifying her actual killer(s), we now think there were three men involved; two in the actual murder and the third with tampering with the body and crime scene. 

   I realize that some readers would like more details: eventually they will come out and we appreciate your patience. There's a huge difference in how some cases have to be handled. When you have a good and active police department and an involved family like we've seen in the Alameda County Jane Doe Case, one can talk fairly openly. When you have a lethargic police department and little/no help from family like in the Prince George's County Jane Doe Case one can still be fairly open because no one's going to take any interest unless you do all of the work for them. But, in case like Walker County Jane Doe's case, you have a police agency that is directly opposing solving the case and a family which---as far as I can tell---has chosen to keep silent, then it's another matter. 

   There are two main reasons for the different approaches. One is that, in this circumstance, we have to have enough evidence to present to a Federal Prosecutor; which we intend to do. In this case, one can't name names or make accusations without something that can actually be disputed in Court. The second reason is that, because we're dealing with a hostile investigative agency, it's not wise to publicize everything that we have; both on the case and on them. They've been a bit lax in their own security lately, and as they say in the MSM, we have "a source close to officials" in/around Huntsville---thus whatever contingencies and subterfuges they have planned, we probably already know about. 

    Take for example, statements from characters like WCSO Sgt. Danny Billingsley who's supposedly been in charge of the investigation. When he finally got around---after 39 years---to getting NCMEC to do a composite, he told the Huntsville Item that "There are some composite sketches out there of Jane Doe but none of them looked alike" (Query: and nobody thought this was an issue?) "We worked with NCMEC and now we have one that we believe looks like the victim at the time of her murder." No seriously, this is coming from somebody whom IIRC saw the actual body and has viewed the autopsy photos. One of the very first things that seemed 'off' about this investigation was that none of the official composites look even remotely alike:

   And none of them look especially similar to the autopsy photos. In fact, the only consistent feature is her necklace: another piece of evidence that WCSO has conveniently lost. "We would love to get her identified" Billingsley claims, "which would be somewhat of a win, and to catch her killer." 

   "Somewhat of a win," he can't even muster enough fake enthusiasm for an interview. Of course, he was talking to The Huntsville Item which rarely has anything but the most effusive praise for Walker County authority figures. Billingsley is also being a bit disingenuous "hoping to catch her killer," since he's apparently been quite vocal in his belief that Henry Lee Lucas was the killer, in spite of having no evidence. This seems to be the official party line; in the 1980s, Detective Ted Pearce told an interviewer that, "We had the bite mark on her left shoulder, and when I went to interview him, he told me he had dental reconstruction done. I was devastated. We had photos of him before, and his teeth looked like they would have matched the bite mark, but we just couldn't make that match. I still believe Henry Lee Lucas killed this girl." Considering that Lucas had a long criminal record, and that prisons kept dental records---or for that matter, they knew who'd done his dental reconstruction and had records---they could have made comparisons. But they didn't. 

   In fact, assuming that WCSO hasn't 'accidentally' since lost the dental impression, they could theoretically check them against the names of the two men whom we suspect were involved in the killing---since one happens to be incarcerated right there in Huntsville and the other a military veteran---but they haven't done that either. 

  None of the information WCSO has given about this case has ever made any sense.  The autopsy report lists her as 5'0-5'2, 100-108 lbs, age 14-16. WCSO says that she was 5'5-5'7 abt. 110 lbs. age 16-18. Yet a witness who saw the night she died was able to make a positive ID from the autopsy photo alone. Another WCSO apparatchik told the press years ago that: "She was a very beautiful young lady, and she had been cared for. She was clean and had been well fed, and her teeth were in good shape. We knew right away she wasn't a transient. I promise you, somebody knows this gal. She just didn't fall out of the sky." I've also thought that a bit peculiar too. Witnesses indicate that she was in some of these very small villages nearby at times and regularly hitch-hiked into the Huntsville area: it seems very strange that so many Huntsville officials living in these same small hamlets and regularly driving the same roads never noticed her. "No one came forward to identify her:" is that really believable? 

   

   Definitely, now is a good time to come forward with information, so hopefully this article can be shared. As I mentioned above, there are also a number of trolls and troublemakers apparently brigading articles on this case. I don't like bothering with these kinds of things but here's a specimen of nonsense that's been circulating on the web:

   No, it isn't connected to PJ Media and the idea that it's run by the wife of  'Ex-Army' was started by some genuine conspiracy kooks connected with the Alt-Right of the MRM. Spreading these rumors around are bad enough, but what's more troubling is that people like this seem to enjoy muddying the waters because they'd rather LARP online and have endless controversy. I'm not a believer in the postmodernist doctrine that "the personal is political" so whatever political opinions expressed elsewhere on this blog really have nothing to do with this case. And BTW, in other cases that I've worked on, nobody in the families or LE concerned has ever bothered to ask whether I voted for Trump or not. For some reason, they seem more concerned with getting cases solved. 

Here's another specimen:

   What's troubling about this kind of comment isn't so much the implication. It appears on a forum where they have four full threads of discussions since 2009 and no solutions, after all. What's troubling is the attitude behind it. The writer seems to think this is all some show we're staging for his benefit and, as a member of the audience, now he's booing because the play's gone on too long. All that I can really say here is the only person I'm doing any of this for is WCJD. I'm not acting for my own benefit, so I'm certainly not acting for yours. 

    I usually don't like giving people like this attention, or responding to these kinds of comments, but I have had people forwarding them to me lately. I also don't mean to put down Websleuths because there are some good people there doing good work. But in light of the baseless conspiracy theories we've been accused of promoting, now we have this to deal with following the Gabbie Patito Case:

     It's now become politically incorrect to help find/identify missing White women. Not that I especially care about Political Correctness, but this does make it a bit harder to get the Media to look into a case like this. Just like the fact that WCJD was a White teenager running free and thus couldn't be turned into a national martyr like some 350-lb. Fentanyl addict has made it harder to get help from legal sources. 

    I really had hoped that we'd not see this case go to 41 years with no resolution, but we're living in a truly evil age and things are unpredictable. All that we can do is to do our best, and we're going to keep at it. 

THE REAL TOXIC MASCULINITY

      A few years ago, we started (a now closed) site that was directed at creating a resource to guide American men. It's been painfully apparent for the last decade at least that the United States is suffering a crisis of Masculinity. Nationally, we seem to have run out of it, and can't even seem to be able to define it anymore. That's one of the reasons why the blog ended up closing; not because it wasn't getting readers, but because it wasn't meeting its purpose. Most of its readers were men who already were in sync with its message, and while they probably picked up some self-improvement tips and were entertained by the stories, it became apparent that we were simply talking over most younger guys' heads. It really became noticeable when Jordan Peterson's 12 Rules for Life came out. When you have a huge percentage of men who think that being told to stand up straight and make their beds every morning are life-changing revelations,---and even have these debated by a lot of other men---then obviously writing articles about building leadership skills and complimentarian relationships was bound not to gain any traction. 

    The sad state of our men was brought home again today when I had occasion to revisit a (then) cold-case that had piqued my interest. It happened a little over two years ago. The police have zero interest in investigating it any further, which is probably understandable since the deceased has since been identified and there's nothing but circumstantial evidence of foul play. To summarize what happened, in the Summer before the Scamdemic and Color Revolution broke out, a hiker was going up a trial in the 'Enchanted Forest' in Altadena, California. The park of this name was formerly the rancho of a lumber company executive named Charles Cobb. The estate fell into foreclosure later, and in 1971 (back in the day when Americans cared more about community than turning a fast buck), money was raised to turn the land into a park.

   At any rate, this hiker noticed the unmistakable smell of something dead and, upon investigating further, found a tent in the underbrush with a dead body inside. The police determined that she was a woman at least 55 years old and had been dead around five months. This was July, 2019. 

  This may sound like a relatively routine police case, except that almost five months to the day earlier, a Youtube video got posted which seemed to throw a different aspect on the case. A group of four Millennial idiots who host a really stupid monetized channel with over 5 million subscribers decided to film a night-time trek through the Enchanted Forest, hoping to document alleged cult activity going on there. I'm posting the link to their video, with the caveat that it is excruciatingly painful---on many different levels---to watch. If I had sons like any of these guys, I'd seriously contemplate suicide: it's that bad. 

  So these four fellows had gone only a short distance down the trail when they heard a woman crying out for help. And they did what any average American man would do these days: they turned tail and ran. Even though they made sure they had the cameras rolling for good content, it didn't even dawn on them to call the police. 

   Eventually, when they felt it safe to return, they slinked back and found some of what women call 'accessories' strewn about; and I might add here that they were of the type a woman approaching her golden years would have worn as opposed to a school-age girl (the woman found dead in the tent was 68 years old). And it's notable also that the Coroner's Report listed the cause of death as what we non-medical people refer to as a heart attack; something that easily could have been brought on by a group of attackers in a woman of that age with those pre-existing conditions. In other words, the poltroonery of these four men very well might have allowed a fatality which could have been prevented. 

  All of this would have been bad enough, but the producers of this video didn't even have enough shame not to post it. It's gotten over 8 million views since 2019 and controversy around it still goes on. As far as I know, the producers have never issued an apology or expressed remorse in any way to the woman's family; or even acknowledged her existence. 

  We hear a lot about toxic masculinity these days, but this is a specimen of what vastated Manhood really looks like. In the village I grew up in, these guys would have been run out of town for something like this. Granted, they may have staged the video and just coincidentally a corpse was found in the area later on that matched the circumstances they portrayed. It's possible---we don't know all the facts. But it doesn't the fact that their conduct---real or staged---was a disgrace to men everywhere. There were four of them who could have intervened, but chose instead not to get involved and save their own skins. And why call the police when you can get exclusive footage of someone dying and cash in on it? 

  Masculinity is not toxic because there's anything inherently wrong with men; it's been poisoned and made toxic by dysfunctional families, corrupt schools, a degenerate media, and a venal Government-Corporate Complex. We've managed to raise a generation of boys who seem to have lost the instinct to preserve and protect. In fact, the last 18 months or so seem to indicate that they've lost their instinct for self-defense as well. There's a very good chance that we won't recover anytime soon.

  The majority of comments on these videos bear this out. Most are indifferent to what went on; some were critical but outnumbered by these schmucks' defenders. The linked video was 'liked' 244,000 to 3,000. 

"People use girls screams to lure innocent people in and kill them. If they all went over to check what was happening they could've gotten killed!"

"The amount of people who think they should bring a weapon to protect themselves."👇

"They could’ve also put themselves in danger I mean, they did. Even if they would’ve went and helped her they would’ve gotten killed themselves."

"Why hate on someone for that? i would've been scared out of my mind and would've ran for my life too."

"If you would call 911 you would just get more attention pulled towards you then the Satan people would be mad at you and start trying to kill you too!"

"Why would someone hate on them for leaving? They were chased by a freaking killer cult! I would leave too!"

"You must be a Trump supporter or something. You can tell the screaming was a prank or was to lure them in because no killer would let their victim scream. So when you call the police all they're gonna find is nothing. Again you'll be wasting their time."

There we have it: the Ameroboob in all his glory. Not a thought about a fellow-human being in trouble. It's all "what's in it for me?" "I got mine, that's their tough luck!" "Blow your ideals, the thing to do is survive!" such is the spirit of the New America. That's why the Great Reset scum are running the table right now. Americans don't care if the Elites take the whole pie just as long as I get my slice!

Our culture has failed our men; and failed them radically. Some tried to warn that we were headed in this direction. Now we're here. We need real men and we don't have them.