Edwin Benson, who writes for various Catholic websites, has a good article on the consequences of the New York City aldermen's absurd decision to allow citizens of the Big Apple to opt of choosing a gender on their birth certificates. One of the blowhards who authored this legislation opined that: "Gender is a spectrum for many folks, and it's not a fixed thing." Reality is also a 'spectrum for many folks'---most of whom are in mental hospitals.
The sheer insanity of this resolution is not deterring the Whacko Left Wing, who are proposing even more extreme legislation elsewhere. Naturally the legislatures on the Pacific Coast are leading the charge. Benson quotes Washington State's perspective on gender, and it's worth reproducing here:
"The language of the Washington State directive is eye-popping, 'a gender that is not exclusively male or female, including, but not limited to, intersex, agender, amalgagender, androgynous, bigender, demigender, female-to-male, genderfluid, genderqueer, male-to-female, neutrois, nonbinary, pangender, third sex, transgender, transsexual, Two Spirit, and unspecified.'”
What any of this means is anybody's guess. Washington is perfect example of what happens when you have a government run by drug addicts and sexual perverts.
The actual reality here is that one can't change one's gender simply by wishing it away and coining new terms. But even more importantly, we can't remove a linchpin of Civilization and expect that there will be no consequences. The Radical Left in Academia long ago declared that 'God is dead'. But religion underpins the entire philosophical base of Civilization, including things like Ethics and the Rule of Law. Without a religious orientation, it logically follows that cultural ethics and the laws upon which they are based are voided. What becomes the basis of these things end up being dictated by pop-culture or by authoritarian government.
The same Leftists then told us that Civilization itself was a relative concept; that our culture was the product of an oppressive 'Patriarchy' produced by dead white males who had no ideals that postmoderns need respect. This includes ideals like liberty, human rights, self-government, world peace, free trade, etc. Throw away our ideals and revile the men who promoted them, and you get the opposite.
Eliminating gender has the same antisocial consequences. In this case, it not only denies philosophy and sociology but actually negates science. Biology and Psychology---and by extension, medicine and education are built on premises of gender differences and appropriate social roles for each. Doctors and psychiatrists can no longer treat sexual perversion no matter how dysfunctional a person might be from engaging in such practices. Or, regardless of what damage they may do to society. Likewise, it's entirely impossible to teach 'gender neutrality' to children independently of exposing them to sexuality long before their minds can analyse these things rationally. It's basically a form of grooming children for paedophiles with full legal cover to do so.
Without the stability of a family and gender-confusion sown in young minds, they will grow eventually into severe neurotics. But the consequences don't stop there. As Benson points out, every facet of society premised on gender differences will come to be challenged. This kind of chaos is social suicide---and it's even worse than the divorce-ridden and dysfunctional families which are far too common in America. At least in the latter cases, the families are still products of the ideal, even though they fall radically short of it. Children growing up in these types of home often realize the difference and strive to do better. In a gender-neutral culture there is no ideal upon which to aspire.
These types of laws need to be slapped down; and hopefully with the Trump Administration reorganizing the Courts with men who respect law and tradition, things will change, Trump has already put two on the US Supreme Court as well as 69 lower-court judges. The opportunity to turn the tide is there.
Tuesday, October 9, 2018
Sunday, October 7, 2018
KAVANAUGH CONFIRMED: LEFT-WING WHACKOS GO BERSERK IN PUBLIC
As predicted, all of the phony media ploys against Brett Kavanaugh turned out to be a tempest in a teapot. Some Leftist websites are talking impeachment already. Which has about as much chance of happening as impeaching Trump.
One of the most satisfying things was watching briefly the reactions of various pundits in the Corporate Media. Instead of their usual hysterics, they seemed completely deflated. This was their most humiliating defeat since November 2016, and the Midterm Elections aren't looking quite as bright for them as they'd hoped.
Out in the streets, it was different. Leftists were really going berserk: especially inside the DC Beltway, but in big cities and on university campuses in general.
Hundreds of these kooks are in the DC Jail after literally storming the barricades and trying to break into the US Capitol to disrupt the Confirmation.
What was especially interesting was reading some of the commentary on social media. It is unbelievably crazy.
All of this is fairly predictable behavior from these nutcases, but Conservatives need to be especially vigilant right now for their own personal safety. Just as we're told that "Satan goes about like a roaring lion seeking someone to devour," so these radicals are going to be prowling around, ready to expend their rage on anybody whom they imagine even remotely resembles a Trump supporter.
And to Judge Kavanaugh: Congratulations. You earned it, Brother.
One of the most satisfying things was watching briefly the reactions of various pundits in the Corporate Media. Instead of their usual hysterics, they seemed completely deflated. This was their most humiliating defeat since November 2016, and the Midterm Elections aren't looking quite as bright for them as they'd hoped.
Out in the streets, it was different. Leftists were really going berserk: especially inside the DC Beltway, but in big cities and on university campuses in general.
Hundreds of these kooks are in the DC Jail after literally storming the barricades and trying to break into the US Capitol to disrupt the Confirmation.
What was especially interesting was reading some of the commentary on social media. It is unbelievably crazy.
All of this is fairly predictable behavior from these nutcases, but Conservatives need to be especially vigilant right now for their own personal safety. Just as we're told that "Satan goes about like a roaring lion seeking someone to devour," so these radicals are going to be prowling around, ready to expend their rage on anybody whom they imagine even remotely resembles a Trump supporter.
And to Judge Kavanaugh: Congratulations. You earned it, Brother.
Thursday, October 4, 2018
A PSA: PLEASE READ AND SHARE (ESPECIALLY TEXAS READERS)
The anniversary of an especially tragic event is coming up in Texas this year. At the request of some interested readers, we're passing along some information about an incident that occurred now 38 years ago and remains unresolved. Some readers may be old enough to remember this story.
On Halloween Night, 1980; at around 6:30 PM, a pretty young woman with sandy brown hair got out of a blue '74 Chevy Caprice at a truck stop near Huntsville, Texas with an unidentified man and asked directions to a state prison facility. She stated that she was from around the Rockport/Aransas Pass area. (This is just north of Corpus Christi). Almost 12 hours later, she was found dead off I-45 near Huntsville by a passing trucker. She had been murdered. Here is the summary from the Walker County Sheriffs Office, circa 2006:
"Case History
The victim's body was dumped on side of I-45 north, 2 miles north of Huntsville, TX.
The general condition of the body and her overall health and nutrition indicated she had probably come from a middle class home. There were no distinguishing marks or any identification with the body.
When the murder became known through media accounts, several people came forward and said they’d seen a teenager matching her description the day before her body was found.
A witness identified the victim as a girl who had been at the South End Gulf station around 6:30 p.m. Halloween night asking for directions to the Ellis prison unit. She had been wearing blue jeans, a yellow pullover sweater with big pockets that hung below her waist, and she was carrying high-heeled sandals in her hand. To the best of his recollection, she had been let out of a 1973 or ‘74 blue Chevrolet, possibly a Caprice, with a lighter colored top, which was being driven by a white male. She looked disheveled like she had been traveling and perhaps sleeping in her clothes.
She left the station, walking north on Sam Houston avenue. A waitress working at the Hitchin’ Post truck stop out on Interstate 45 said the girl came into the restaurant the same evening and again, asked for directions to the Ellis Unit, saying she had a friend there. A map was drawn for her and she departed. The waitress asked the girl how old she was and the girl responded 19. The witness claimed that was an obvious lie and she then asked her if her parents knew where she was. The young girl replied, "Who cares". The witness then stated she asked her where she was from. The girl replied Aransas Pass/Rockport, TX area. It has not been verified that the girl was the unidentified victim. "
She is currently still known only as 'Walker County Jane Doe.' The case has never been solved, though in 1999 she was exhumed to recover DNA samples. In 2015, the case was officially reopened. Here are some of the better reconstructions of how she looked in life:
I don't know the source of this next one, but it appears to have been a profile based from one of her autopsy photos:
The general consensus today is that she was about 15 years old. She was 5-6 and slender, about 105-110 lbs., according to the autopsy report. She had a distinguishing scar about 1 1/2 inches long next to her right eyebrow and another scar on her right elbow. It's determined that, although a runaway, she probably came from a middle-class home and had access to hygiene. Her hair was styled and her nails were painted. She also had pierced ears.
After her case was reopened in 2015, a citizen produced a Polaroid photo taken in April 1980 at a motel in Beeville, Texas.
The girl on the right is the informant's sister who was then 12 years old. The other girl, whose name was 'Kathy' or 'Katie' was a friend whom she met at the motel. Kathy told the other girl that she was a runaway from Corpus Christi, and staying with some friends at the motel. She also mentioned planning to visit a friend in prison. The picture was taken after the girls had been swimming, but a close-up shows a remarkable resemblance, possibly including the scar near the eye:
This girl is also unidentified, but there's a fairly good chance she and the 'Jane Doe' are one and the same.
As to the circumstances of the murder, they were horrible. She died of ligature strangulation after being beaten badly, even bitten, and violently raped with a blunt object. Her time of death was estimated at 3 A.M. Except for her necklace and shoes, she was found naked and lying face-down near a watershed.
Several theories have circulated as to the perpetrators of the crime. The author of the Facebook page dedicated to identifying her believes it was a passing trucker. Some commenters there have made a good case that the couple with whom she lived were responsible (their whereabouts are unknown and they've never come forward). Another recently suggested, based on the time and date of the killing, that it may have been a cultish ritual murder. Police have theorized that it also could have been a Lesbian/homosexual attack. There were known serial killers active in the area then, but none fit the modus operandi; or have been ruled out for other reasons. An interesting corollary to the cult and serial killer theories is that this murder occurred exactly one year after another unidentified girl was found near Georgetown, Texas under very similar circumstances.
Be all this as it may, we're reaching out to our readers in the Blogosphere for information, either to the girl's identity or her death. Feel free to leave comments here and we can pass them on, or contact the Walker County Sheriff's Office at (936) 435-2400.
On Halloween Night, 1980; at around 6:30 PM, a pretty young woman with sandy brown hair got out of a blue '74 Chevy Caprice at a truck stop near Huntsville, Texas with an unidentified man and asked directions to a state prison facility. She stated that she was from around the Rockport/Aransas Pass area. (This is just north of Corpus Christi). Almost 12 hours later, she was found dead off I-45 near Huntsville by a passing trucker. She had been murdered. Here is the summary from the Walker County Sheriffs Office, circa 2006:
"Case History
The victim's body was dumped on side of I-45 north, 2 miles north of Huntsville, TX.
The general condition of the body and her overall health and nutrition indicated she had probably come from a middle class home. There were no distinguishing marks or any identification with the body.
When the murder became known through media accounts, several people came forward and said they’d seen a teenager matching her description the day before her body was found.
A witness identified the victim as a girl who had been at the South End Gulf station around 6:30 p.m. Halloween night asking for directions to the Ellis prison unit. She had been wearing blue jeans, a yellow pullover sweater with big pockets that hung below her waist, and she was carrying high-heeled sandals in her hand. To the best of his recollection, she had been let out of a 1973 or ‘74 blue Chevrolet, possibly a Caprice, with a lighter colored top, which was being driven by a white male. She looked disheveled like she had been traveling and perhaps sleeping in her clothes.
She left the station, walking north on Sam Houston avenue. A waitress working at the Hitchin’ Post truck stop out on Interstate 45 said the girl came into the restaurant the same evening and again, asked for directions to the Ellis Unit, saying she had a friend there. A map was drawn for her and she departed. The waitress asked the girl how old she was and the girl responded 19. The witness claimed that was an obvious lie and she then asked her if her parents knew where she was. The young girl replied, "Who cares". The witness then stated she asked her where she was from. The girl replied Aransas Pass/Rockport, TX area. It has not been verified that the girl was the unidentified victim. "
She is currently still known only as 'Walker County Jane Doe.' The case has never been solved, though in 1999 she was exhumed to recover DNA samples. In 2015, the case was officially reopened. Here are some of the better reconstructions of how she looked in life:
I don't know the source of this next one, but it appears to have been a profile based from one of her autopsy photos:
The general consensus today is that she was about 15 years old. She was 5-6 and slender, about 105-110 lbs., according to the autopsy report. She had a distinguishing scar about 1 1/2 inches long next to her right eyebrow and another scar on her right elbow. It's determined that, although a runaway, she probably came from a middle-class home and had access to hygiene. Her hair was styled and her nails were painted. She also had pierced ears.
After her case was reopened in 2015, a citizen produced a Polaroid photo taken in April 1980 at a motel in Beeville, Texas.
The girl on the right is the informant's sister who was then 12 years old. The other girl, whose name was 'Kathy' or 'Katie' was a friend whom she met at the motel. Kathy told the other girl that she was a runaway from Corpus Christi, and staying with some friends at the motel. She also mentioned planning to visit a friend in prison. The picture was taken after the girls had been swimming, but a close-up shows a remarkable resemblance, possibly including the scar near the eye:
This girl is also unidentified, but there's a fairly good chance she and the 'Jane Doe' are one and the same.
As to the circumstances of the murder, they were horrible. She died of ligature strangulation after being beaten badly, even bitten, and violently raped with a blunt object. Her time of death was estimated at 3 A.M. Except for her necklace and shoes, she was found naked and lying face-down near a watershed.
Several theories have circulated as to the perpetrators of the crime. The author of the Facebook page dedicated to identifying her believes it was a passing trucker. Some commenters there have made a good case that the couple with whom she lived were responsible (their whereabouts are unknown and they've never come forward). Another recently suggested, based on the time and date of the killing, that it may have been a cultish ritual murder. Police have theorized that it also could have been a Lesbian/homosexual attack. There were known serial killers active in the area then, but none fit the modus operandi; or have been ruled out for other reasons. An interesting corollary to the cult and serial killer theories is that this murder occurred exactly one year after another unidentified girl was found near Georgetown, Texas under very similar circumstances.
Be all this as it may, we're reaching out to our readers in the Blogosphere for information, either to the girl's identity or her death. Feel free to leave comments here and we can pass them on, or contact the Walker County Sheriff's Office at (936) 435-2400.
WHAT IF SOMEBODY LAUNCHED A RICIN ATTACK AND NOBODY CAME?
Yesterday, there was an emergency inside the DC Beltway. Some whacko---another product of our postmodern military---sent letters laced with Ricin to President Trump, General Mattis, Senator Cruz, and the Secretary of the Navy. The quick action of the US Secret Service and Postal Inspection Service thwarted any casualties.
And the Jeff Sessions-revamped FBI deserves a round of applause for catching the attacker in less than 24 hours.
So one would think that an attempt to wipe out four top American Government officials with a chemical weapon would be in the headlines. Nope. A search engine run on the story shows that the Corporate Media hasn't covered it since yesterday. And then it was yawning over 'a suspicious substance that is alleged to be ricin.' The top stories on Yahoo News are:
1. "Former Classmate Shocked that Kavanaugh Testifies 'Devil's Triangle' wasn't about Sex!"
2. "Sarah Huckabee Sanders Hits Jim Acosta with Low Blow Arguing about Facts!"
3. "Buffy the Vampire Slayer is Now a Kavanaugh-Accuser Bashing Trump-Troll!"
4. "Dream Cruise Ruined by 1,300 Partying Tobacco Company Employees!"
5. "Connie Chung Reveals that she was Sexually Assaulted!"
These the kinds of headlines that we used to see on cheap supermarket tabloids. It's really very reminiscent of their coverage of the 2017 assassination attempt on Republican Congressional leaders during practice for a charity baseball game. The story dropped out of the news with an air of media disappointment that nobody besides the attacker was killed. It seems like it's the same in this case: there's a collective depression in the press that the Ricin attack didn't succeed.
The Media has reached a point in our Trash Culture where sleazy sex 'scandals' and celebrity gossip has actually supplanted threats to National Security as important news. I recall that during the O.J. Simpson Trial how some used to quip that the networks would preempt coverage of a nuclear war to cover the trial. That appears to have been less a joke than a prophecy.
And the Jeff Sessions-revamped FBI deserves a round of applause for catching the attacker in less than 24 hours.
So one would think that an attempt to wipe out four top American Government officials with a chemical weapon would be in the headlines. Nope. A search engine run on the story shows that the Corporate Media hasn't covered it since yesterday. And then it was yawning over 'a suspicious substance that is alleged to be ricin.' The top stories on Yahoo News are:
1. "Former Classmate Shocked that Kavanaugh Testifies 'Devil's Triangle' wasn't about Sex!"
2. "Sarah Huckabee Sanders Hits Jim Acosta with Low Blow Arguing about Facts!"
3. "Buffy the Vampire Slayer is Now a Kavanaugh-Accuser Bashing Trump-Troll!"
4. "Dream Cruise Ruined by 1,300 Partying Tobacco Company Employees!"
5. "Connie Chung Reveals that she was Sexually Assaulted!"
These the kinds of headlines that we used to see on cheap supermarket tabloids. It's really very reminiscent of their coverage of the 2017 assassination attempt on Republican Congressional leaders during practice for a charity baseball game. The story dropped out of the news with an air of media disappointment that nobody besides the attacker was killed. It seems like it's the same in this case: there's a collective depression in the press that the Ricin attack didn't succeed.
The Media has reached a point in our Trash Culture where sleazy sex 'scandals' and celebrity gossip has actually supplanted threats to National Security as important news. I recall that during the O.J. Simpson Trial how some used to quip that the networks would preempt coverage of a nuclear war to cover the trial. That appears to have been less a joke than a prophecy.
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
SLEAZY 'RETURN OF KINGS' WEBSITE COLLAPSES
There was some surprising---albeit welcome---news to start off the month. It appears that Roosh Valizadeh's scummy Alt-RINO site Return of Kings may be out of circulation. Roosh has been pouting after Amazon banned several of his books for violating their terms of sale. Today, he announced that ROK was going on 'indefinite hiatus' because of an alleged lack of funds. Paypal banned Roosh in 2017, and, in July, they terminated relations with Freestartr, Roosh's main crowd-funding forum.
"I'm sure that many of you understand that we are in the early stages of a censorship wave that will sweep through society," he pontificates, "Scoundrels like myself will get banned first, then the hammer will fall on anyone who dares share the truth." The 'censored' Roosh then goes on to list two of his other websites, a Youtube channel, Soundcloud, Twitter, and Instagram where he is still active. And Amazon, incidentally, did not ban three of his other books.
Conservatives need to understand that the downfall of these various fringe sites has nothing to do with censorship. Even an ultra-Liberal propaganda organ like Slate admitted that Internet policy changes are affecting site traffic all across the political spectrum. The other important thing to note is that bans that have befallen many of them are entirely of their own making. Valizadeh knew full well that his books' content violated Amazon policy when he submitted them. The Daily Stormer was de-platformed because its content threatened to embroil its webhosts in active civil litigation. Alex Jones was a victim of his own stupidity. After being warned by Youtube three times that his content violated their policies, Jones' channel was suspended for 30 days---which he violated again by using proxy sites. Now he's banned from Youtube permanently: like everyone else who's done that. Vox Day was expelled from the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America after arguing---on an SFFWA public Twitter account---that he should have been awarded a Hugo for best author over N.K. Jemisin because White men are superior to Black women.
Back during the 1950's, William F. Buckley drove extremists out of the Conservative Movement like the Birchers and Objectivists. Both of those groups are political moderates compared to what appeared on Return of Kings. The site is blatantly anti-Semitic, overtly racist, and promoted both false and directly anti-Christian doctrines. It taught men that women were of no value other than their sexual utility to men; and encouraged men to use ruthless manipulation, instilling fear, and using violence if necessary to obtain that kind of gratification. No real Conservative believes in any of this garbage.
It's hard to say whether this is will be a permanent thing. Roosh has been known to throw public tantrums before; and now he's acting like a 10-year old boy running away from home, hoping we'll all beg him to come back. With any luck, he'll run into the Bermuda Triangle. But we'll see...
"I'm sure that many of you understand that we are in the early stages of a censorship wave that will sweep through society," he pontificates, "Scoundrels like myself will get banned first, then the hammer will fall on anyone who dares share the truth." The 'censored' Roosh then goes on to list two of his other websites, a Youtube channel, Soundcloud, Twitter, and Instagram where he is still active. And Amazon, incidentally, did not ban three of his other books.
Conservatives need to understand that the downfall of these various fringe sites has nothing to do with censorship. Even an ultra-Liberal propaganda organ like Slate admitted that Internet policy changes are affecting site traffic all across the political spectrum. The other important thing to note is that bans that have befallen many of them are entirely of their own making. Valizadeh knew full well that his books' content violated Amazon policy when he submitted them. The Daily Stormer was de-platformed because its content threatened to embroil its webhosts in active civil litigation. Alex Jones was a victim of his own stupidity. After being warned by Youtube three times that his content violated their policies, Jones' channel was suspended for 30 days---which he violated again by using proxy sites. Now he's banned from Youtube permanently: like everyone else who's done that. Vox Day was expelled from the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America after arguing---on an SFFWA public Twitter account---that he should have been awarded a Hugo for best author over N.K. Jemisin because White men are superior to Black women.
Back during the 1950's, William F. Buckley drove extremists out of the Conservative Movement like the Birchers and Objectivists. Both of those groups are political moderates compared to what appeared on Return of Kings. The site is blatantly anti-Semitic, overtly racist, and promoted both false and directly anti-Christian doctrines. It taught men that women were of no value other than their sexual utility to men; and encouraged men to use ruthless manipulation, instilling fear, and using violence if necessary to obtain that kind of gratification. No real Conservative believes in any of this garbage.
It's hard to say whether this is will be a permanent thing. Roosh has been known to throw public tantrums before; and now he's acting like a 10-year old boy running away from home, hoping we'll all beg him to come back. With any luck, he'll run into the Bermuda Triangle. But we'll see...
Saturday, September 29, 2018
AMERICA'S ANTI-MALE HYSTERIA
The Kavanaugh Hearings have generated a lot of controversy, but all of it is controversy circumventing the real sociological problem which underlies it all. Beginning with the Clarence Thomas Hearings of the early 1990's, our culture---led by fake 'elites' in Media, Academia, and Government---have gone on a full-scale anti-male witch hunt. We recently saw the revolting spectacle of actor Bill Cosby destroyed over no more than rumors of committing heterosexual acts at some time in the remote past. With Kavanaugh, we're told that sometime in High School, he got drunk and chased girls.
Because, really. Young men in their teens and early twenties never have wild parties and have no interest in the opposite sex. Or, if they do, they shouldn't. Thankfully, the Media has come on the scene---along with DNC apparatchiks---to expose the national horror that young men enjoy parties and sex.
The Kavanaugh Hearings reflect nothing other than the nadir to which our 'cultural elites' have sunk. Since the cesspool that was the Thomas Hearings occurred, both prominent and ordinary men who've been admired or worked in respected jobs have been systematically torn down upon the flimsiest pretexts. Some were acquitted but had their reputations destroyed. Others were jailed on very dubious legal grounds. This is no accident. There are elements within our culture which hate masculinity with a passion.
It wasn't always this way. A man was somebody with whom women and children felt safe. The Whacko Left Wing and their Feminist and Homo confederates have created a social milieu where men are feared by women and children. I recall reading on Dr. Rookh Kshatriya's blog of a German sociological study about Western attitudes towards men. The question simply showed a picture of a smiling adult male watching some children at play. They asked the question: 'Who do you think that this man is?' Respondents in Germany, Belgium, Holland, France, Spain, Portugal, and Italy mostly believed him a father of one of the children. Or, the second most popular answer was that he was a passing stranger waxing nostalgic of his own childhood. But in the US, UK, and Canada the top answer was the man was likely a pedophile. Tell us again that we don't have an issue with men in this country.
We need to start recognizing and confronting this issue. Men are the natural protectors of women, children, and society at large. An emasculated society is in grave danger. I think that most women and children understand this instinctively; but cultural pressure forces these sensibilities into the background.
The other side-effect of anti-male hysteria is that many men will withdraw from their responsibilities and turn against the very society that they should be defending. Men are instinctively afraid of insignificance. A society that rejects heroes will produce thugs. White Supremacists, gangs like MS-13, ISIS and Al-Qaeda, and extremist religious cults reach out to alienated men and offer them the purpose that effete postmodern society denies them.
Who's really behind this, and how can we change it? The answer to the first question comes simply by asking: cui bono? Who benefits socially from turning women against men and destroying male role models for children? Here's a clue. It's also no accident that the same Leftists who promulgate anti-male hysteria also have no issue promulgating pro-homosexual policies and giving them access to children. Which leads us to the issue of change.
It's up to women to see through this propaganda and start realizing that it is the Left and not men who are their real enemies. They need to understand three basic things:
1. The Left's purpose in emasculating society is that they leave women and children defenseless against their own political power-plays.
2. The Left's goal, by their own admission, is to promote androgyny and sexual anarchism. Their support for 'sexual liberation' is a smokescreen and they are just as sex-negative towards heterosexual women as they are to men.
3. The Left cares nothing about children except to deprive women of their rights as nurturers, protectors, and educators of the young and force them into male social roles wherein women will uphold the Left with their labor and taxes.
The Kavanaugh Hearings are an opportunity for women to start turning the tide. If women turn their backs on the Left, then the Left will be finished and their schemes will never come to fruition. Let's see women start taking back the future.
Because, really. Young men in their teens and early twenties never have wild parties and have no interest in the opposite sex. Or, if they do, they shouldn't. Thankfully, the Media has come on the scene---along with DNC apparatchiks---to expose the national horror that young men enjoy parties and sex.
The Kavanaugh Hearings reflect nothing other than the nadir to which our 'cultural elites' have sunk. Since the cesspool that was the Thomas Hearings occurred, both prominent and ordinary men who've been admired or worked in respected jobs have been systematically torn down upon the flimsiest pretexts. Some were acquitted but had their reputations destroyed. Others were jailed on very dubious legal grounds. This is no accident. There are elements within our culture which hate masculinity with a passion.
It wasn't always this way. A man was somebody with whom women and children felt safe. The Whacko Left Wing and their Feminist and Homo confederates have created a social milieu where men are feared by women and children. I recall reading on Dr. Rookh Kshatriya's blog of a German sociological study about Western attitudes towards men. The question simply showed a picture of a smiling adult male watching some children at play. They asked the question: 'Who do you think that this man is?' Respondents in Germany, Belgium, Holland, France, Spain, Portugal, and Italy mostly believed him a father of one of the children. Or, the second most popular answer was that he was a passing stranger waxing nostalgic of his own childhood. But in the US, UK, and Canada the top answer was the man was likely a pedophile. Tell us again that we don't have an issue with men in this country.
We need to start recognizing and confronting this issue. Men are the natural protectors of women, children, and society at large. An emasculated society is in grave danger. I think that most women and children understand this instinctively; but cultural pressure forces these sensibilities into the background.
Who's really behind this, and how can we change it? The answer to the first question comes simply by asking: cui bono? Who benefits socially from turning women against men and destroying male role models for children? Here's a clue. It's also no accident that the same Leftists who promulgate anti-male hysteria also have no issue promulgating pro-homosexual policies and giving them access to children. Which leads us to the issue of change.
It's up to women to see through this propaganda and start realizing that it is the Left and not men who are their real enemies. They need to understand three basic things:
1. The Left's purpose in emasculating society is that they leave women and children defenseless against their own political power-plays.
2. The Left's goal, by their own admission, is to promote androgyny and sexual anarchism. Their support for 'sexual liberation' is a smokescreen and they are just as sex-negative towards heterosexual women as they are to men.
3. The Left cares nothing about children except to deprive women of their rights as nurturers, protectors, and educators of the young and force them into male social roles wherein women will uphold the Left with their labor and taxes.
The Kavanaugh Hearings are an opportunity for women to start turning the tide. If women turn their backs on the Left, then the Left will be finished and their schemes will never come to fruition. Let's see women start taking back the future.
Wednesday, September 26, 2018
KAVANAUGH AND THE HIGH-TECH LYNCH MOBS
Thus far, we haven't commented much about the Senate Confirmation Hearings for Brett Kavanaugh. This is mostly because other Conservative blogs have been doing an admirable job handling the subject---from outlining Kavanaugh's ideology to debunking Leftist lies. There isn't much that we could add that hasn't already been said on these subjects.
But what does need addressing is the mass-hysteria that Kavanaugh's nomination has generated among the Whacko Left and their wire-pullers in the Media and Academia. This is being carried on a level which we haven't seen in 26 years.
The Confirmation Hearings for Clarence Thomas in 1992 were such a low-point in our national history that Court Nominees---regardless of party---have sailed through the Senate largely without controversy ever since.
Historically, Supreme Court confirmations were considered above political partisanship. Judges were usually questioned more closely about their legal philosophies and commitments to upholding the balance of power. This changed in 1987 when the Radical Left launched a brutal smear-campaign against Judge Robert Bork's nomination. When President Bush Sr. nominated Clarence Thomas, these base and unethical tactics hit their nadir. The Left falsely accused Bork of racism---which they obviously couldn't do in Thomas' case. So they played the 'sexism' card.
Thomas was accused of sexual harassment; a term which never existed in the American sociopolitical vocabulary until then. It's just as meaningless a term now as it was then; but the perverts in the Corporate Media drilled it into the national consciousness. All of the sex-negative laws and policies plaguing our country for the last 26 years come from the Thomas Confirmation Hearings. So does the phenomenon of women 'coming forward' in droves to pile on any man unfortunate enough to get accused of doing heterosexual things.
The hearings were lurid, irrelevant to any judicial issue, and made the US Senate an international laughing-stock. It was a display of Trash Culture being practiced at the highest levels. It caused a number of newly-liberated ex-Communist countries to think twice about installing American-style judiciaries in their own countries.
The fact that the Left has returned to the tactics of the Bork/Thomas cesspools to attack Kavanaugh is only further proof of their desperation. The Leftists have no idea why they oppose Kavanaugh's nomination; nor what they'll do if he is defeated. Trump will nominate another Conservative and nothing will have been accomplished, from the Liberal standpoint. All that they are really succeeding at doing is making themselves look like fools.
But what does need addressing is the mass-hysteria that Kavanaugh's nomination has generated among the Whacko Left and their wire-pullers in the Media and Academia. This is being carried on a level which we haven't seen in 26 years.
The Confirmation Hearings for Clarence Thomas in 1992 were such a low-point in our national history that Court Nominees---regardless of party---have sailed through the Senate largely without controversy ever since.
Historically, Supreme Court confirmations were considered above political partisanship. Judges were usually questioned more closely about their legal philosophies and commitments to upholding the balance of power. This changed in 1987 when the Radical Left launched a brutal smear-campaign against Judge Robert Bork's nomination. When President Bush Sr. nominated Clarence Thomas, these base and unethical tactics hit their nadir. The Left falsely accused Bork of racism---which they obviously couldn't do in Thomas' case. So they played the 'sexism' card.
Thomas was accused of sexual harassment; a term which never existed in the American sociopolitical vocabulary until then. It's just as meaningless a term now as it was then; but the perverts in the Corporate Media drilled it into the national consciousness. All of the sex-negative laws and policies plaguing our country for the last 26 years come from the Thomas Confirmation Hearings. So does the phenomenon of women 'coming forward' in droves to pile on any man unfortunate enough to get accused of doing heterosexual things.
The hearings were lurid, irrelevant to any judicial issue, and made the US Senate an international laughing-stock. It was a display of Trash Culture being practiced at the highest levels. It caused a number of newly-liberated ex-Communist countries to think twice about installing American-style judiciaries in their own countries.
The fact that the Left has returned to the tactics of the Bork/Thomas cesspools to attack Kavanaugh is only further proof of their desperation. The Leftists have no idea why they oppose Kavanaugh's nomination; nor what they'll do if he is defeated. Trump will nominate another Conservative and nothing will have been accomplished, from the Liberal standpoint. All that they are really succeeding at doing is making themselves look like fools.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)