FOLKLORE FAITH AND SETTLED SCIENCE

       InsanityBytes has been doing a good series lately on Folklore Faith debunking some of the blasphemies common misconceptions held by postmodern Churchians. The second installment, All Gods Are Equal and Valid had an interesting meme which encapsulates much of the spiritual vacuity of the present age.

    A meme like this could only have produced by someone from the Millennial/ Zoomer Generation. It has all of the earmarks of what passes among them for deep and profound argumentation. Basically, one takes an aphorism, states it as though it were an indisputable fact, then punctuates it with a snarky, self-righteous statement which is presented as a self-evident conclusion. Such is the result of life in a Theatrocracy: a culture where comedians and influencers drive public discourse.  

   Plutarch, a Roman historian who's been relegated to Dead White Male status in our day, spoke of the downfall of Ancient Athens which began with this kind of contempt for actual wisdom following the passing of Pericles. "With public approbation, the statuesque oratory of Pericles gave way to Cleon's theatrical delivery. Girding up his himation, he strode up and down the bema haranguing in a loud voice and vilifying his opponents; thus he corrupted the people by his impulsive manners." 

 Plato, another Dead White Male, whose thought has today given way in favor of geniuses like Keith Olbermann and Stephan Colbert, who lived during this period wrote: "In this way, the theatres from being mute have become vocal, as though they had an understanding of good and bad...and instead of an aristocracy an evil sort of theatrocracy has grown up. Consequent to this has come disobedience to rulers, and then to escape the control of parents and elders; and when near the end, control also of the laws." It hardly needs explanation that then, as now, that "the people were enticed by demagogues from their ideals of philanthropy, conceived by Aeschylus and brought into public life by Pericles, to a policy of brute force in the government of allies and of narrow, material selfishness in the extension of their power."

   If most of these smart boys would actually go back and read some of these now-despised writers instead of popping off in Hookah Lounges and online chatrooms, they would make less fools of themselves. 

      In the first place, they would learn that haven't really been "3,000 gods so far," but only One. The learned among our pagan forefathers all agreed that the Divine Nature is indivisible; and that the names and rituals pertaining to ancient deities were merely localized cultural expressions of a belief in the same Supreme Being. What we would call today angels or saints were also venerated, as it was believed that these lesser 'gods' had particular provinces over which they assisted mankind. These ideals were often based on natural symbols such as Astronomy or animalistic totems. But over all of these was One Supreme God. 

   Contrary to what Postmodern Academia teaches, wars, persecutions, and conflicts fought on purely religious grounds are uncommon in human history. Governments rarely moved against religious sects unless they were seen as a threat to public order; and in more modern times religion has been used as cover for purely economic or political wars and persecutions. 

   Then, as now, a few cults and fanatics would appear and these were believed to motivated by false gods or evil spirits. The criterion for defining these false gods was later expressed by Jesus "By their fruits you shall know them." This involves discernment, since what we know of God's Perfect Goodness would certainly not be in anyway compatible with the theology of an organization like ISIS. 

  But in our supposedly enlightened era, discernment is a wholly lacking quality among society in general. Hence we've seen the simultaneous rise of both Satanic Cults and Materialistic Scientism: the motto of both of which should be "My ignorance is as valid as your knowledge." Their understanding of the Divine Nature is abysmally poor; to them it is only a set of arbitrary commandments which they simply can invalidate by wishing away.

  

     God is by definition, the Father of us all, and by the same definition, the Source of Absolute Perfection and Goodness. By belief in God, and love for Him and His Principles, we try to imitate His character. This is the source of moral absolutes. When we abandon the belief that human nature is essentially the same and that moral absolutes are fixed; what we are left with is what Erich Fromm described as "an attitude of indifference where everything is possible and nothing is certain. An increasing number of people," he continued, "are feeling confused about everything: work, politics, and morals; and what is worse, they believe this confusion to be a normal state of mind. They feel isolated, bewildered, and powerless: they do not experience life in terms of their own thoughts, emotions, and sense-perceptions but in terms of the experiences that they are supposed to have." Years after Fromm warned of this tendency, we've reached a nadir where no one can define something as simple as gender; and anyone who states the obvious is bludgeoned into silence. Most Americans are content to float off into drug-induced stupors and not think about it. 

   Authoritarian political and social leaders---backed heavily by financial interests---of course, naturally wish to step into the void and usurp the place of God. This, we're informed by Theology, was the sin of Lucifer, so it should come as no surprise that Satanic Cults are growing in power and influence. The Devil is the supernatural archetype of the types of megalomaniacs directing western society at the present time.

    If human nature has no fixed point and becomes infinitely malleable, then Social Engineers could in theory mold man to whatever system they pleased. Man would only be the product of artificial social constructs, as the Academic Mafia teaches now. No social order could, in theory, be judged as adverse to man's welfare since according to this doctrine, there is no human nature being violated. 

   History of course shows this type of very perverted Social Darwinism to be a complete lie; because human nature rising up against these planned systems and organized injustice is part of our heritage. The United States in particular began as an overthrow of a royal tyrant and his wicked schemes to make his subjects. George III tried to appeal to false religion too; styling himself His Divine Majesty; with toady bishops who preached his power "By the Grace of God." Our forefathers didn't fall for this nonsense, but established a self-governing Republic under the aegis that "All men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights." Postmodern Academia has tried to cloud this with appeals to sophistry like Critical Race Theory, but facts are stubborn things. 

  We must be especially on guard today against the kinds of ignoramuses like the publisher of the anti-God meme. The real danger with such people is that they sound superficially smart, and they target their messages to those unaccustomed to critical thinking or too besotted with narcotics either to know or care what the truth is. 

CANCEL CULTURE AND THE CONSTITUTION

    As if we needed any further evidence that American Cultural Rot has reached the terminal stage, a Heartland Institute Poll was released this week indicating that a growing number of Ameroboobs believe that Cancel Culture should be extended to the U.S. Constitution. Granted, very little of the Constitution is still enforced anymore anyway; but the popular attitude towards it represents a very dangerous cultural shift.

   "53 percent of Democrats voice their support for eliminating the Supreme Court altogether, in favor of replacing it with a new, democratically elected court with justices chosen by the American people directly...In the same poll, a slightly larger majority of voters between the ages of 19 and 39 want to abolish the high court, at 54 percent." The author of the article seems to take comfort in the fact that "only" 1/5 of Republicans and 2/5 of Independents agree with the idea. Frankly, I don't take much solace in such statistics. 

   The especially troubling aspect of this poll is the cavalier attitude of the respondents to one of the most important foundational parts of the structure of our Republic. Political polls usually indicate that the people's dissatisfaction arises from the Government's failure to follow or enforce the Constitution: this is the first I've encountered where the public is actually stating that Constitutional provisions themselves ought to be jettisoned. 

    "67 percent of Democrats believe that the Supreme Court is a 'fundamentally sexist institution that favors men over women,' only 18 percent of Republicans share this sentiment, as do 36 percent of independents. Similarly, 56 percent of Democrats called the court a 'fundamentally racist institution,' with only 14 percent of Republicans and 29 percent of independents saying the same thing."

   The Supreme Court is not without its problems, but like most of our national issues, they are problems entirely of our own making. The problems that the Supreme Court has are precisely because of appointments being made through partisan cronyism (e.g. David Souter, John Roberts); or appointing incompetents because they represent 'diversity' (e.g. Ginsberg, Jackson, Sotomayor). The intention of the Founding Fathers was that men who were recognized as the top Constitutional experts and most experienced jurists would be selected for the job. The American People have not only allowed our Courts to become compromised by cheap politicians, they've encouraged it. And the numbers cited among younger Americans show that we've also failed considerably teaching the basic principles of self-government both at home and in schools.

   If you're over a certain age in America, you probably recall learning about the System of Checks and Balances sometime between the ages of 10 and 12; one again has to wonder where American parents in the postmodern era have been all this time. Actually, it's not much of a mystery.

     Which leads to a question I posed in the comments to the linked article:

   "Here's a question for all the True Believers out there: Say that we have a Red Wave this November and have all the investigations into Hunter's porn-surfing. How is that going to solve the problem of so many Americans willing to abolish the Supreme Court and replace it with diversity councils? How are they going to reverse the damage done by 'more than a half-century of liberals running America’s K-12 schools and colleges?'"

   The answer is, of course, that it can't and it won't---that's assuming even if by some chance we actually have anything like a normal election to begin with. There's nothing that the Great Reset Oligarchs would enjoy more than having the Third Branch of Government abolished because it's the only one that can veto their plans and carries the legal authority to do it. 

  And they're going get it abolished (or radically altered) too: those poll numbers show that we're not very far from at least a plurality demanding it. We've already been tolerating utterly illegal show trials---more recently they've become even more blatant: like the 'trial' of Derrick Chauvin, Ghisalline Maxwell, the Jan. 6 protesters, and soon Julian Assange.  As bad as it is now, we are really going to regret it when we have real Peoples' Tribunals based upon ideology over the Rule of Law.

    
   That goes too for those on the Right who thought that going-along-to-get-along was the best policy and that what went on in the Culture didn't effect them. We lose the Federal Judiciary and residing in "a safe Red State" isn't going to help very much; and when they do finally come, we'll have nobody to blame but ourselves. 

   

LEGAL ABORTION IS NOT A COST-BENEFIT ISSUE

    Since our last post on the downfall of the Roe v. Wade decision, quite a number on the Right have been receiving some criticism for their positions that the Supreme Court's ruling was only the beginning  and not the end of the fight for life; and also for calling out the hypocrisy of many so-called 'Conservative' sentiments on the issue. Since the decision was handed down, the Conservative leadership---which has ignored the issue since the 1970s---is doing its best to sweep the issue under the rug and to convince us all that we should continue doing what the Right usually does: look the other way and be thankful we don't live in a libtard state where Abortion is legal. It's rather telling that less than two weeks after the historic ruling, the subject has nearly disappeared from the opinion pages of the Controlled Opposition Conservative press.

  At my suggestion on another site that the SCOTUS Decision could end federally-funded abortions and open the door for a Constitutional ban, one such realistic Conservative commented:

  "J. Alito's well supported Dobbs opinion makes your idea, as well as federal abortion as a federal constitutional rights, absurd...The court didn't say abortion is illegal on federal level. It said that the Constitution is silent. States may authorize it, and most Americans live in states where most abortions are legal post Dobbs. Abortion's here to stay."

  And furthermore: ."First trimester abortions eventually will be upheld everywhere even by state constitutions. The 'potential' life is far different than the post viability person the law should protect. Roe was, as Alito stated, not backed by any amendment-Fifth, Fourteenth, Ninth - or vague liberty provision. But privacy is in some state constitutions, and where it's not it's an attractive alternative for allowing first trimester abortions since a 'person' doesn't exist in the womb at that stage."

  Aside from his utter ignorance of Biology, the one thing noteworthy in this type of argument is a complete disregard for the whole premise of Human Rights: specifically the Right to Life. One of the issues which clearly defines a real Conservative as a opposed to a fake one is that life begins at conception and that this position is not open to debate. Common Sense alone should tell anybody that Life either begins at certain point, or it doesn't. Just like the completely arbitrary 'six-foot social distancing' rule during the height of the COVID hysteria, Conservatives are buying into this whole Trimester nonsense when it's completely obvious that the time from the formation of an embryo to natural birth is a continuum in a single process. A 'trimester' is nothing but a general medical description of various stages in the process.

   But such reasoning is about what we'd expect from a culture that seriously believes gender is something assigned by doctors.

    Now that the Conservative punditocracy has found itself neatly painted in the proverbial corner---with too many constituents demanding that they take action, one of their number Prof. Walter Block wrote a piece on Independence Day justifying the virtue of compromising on the Abortion issue. This article was so bad that I actually thought it was satire at the first reading, but no: this guy really means it. 

   Block argues that: "it might be a good time to consider the philosophical case for and against abortion. Which is correct: The pro-choice view or the pro-life position? Neither. The only tenable stance is a compromise between the two of them, called evictionism...What, then, is evictionism? It is the view that the mother has a right to evict her baby at any stage of its development, but not, ever, to kill him (except in self-defense when her life or health is at stake). At the present level of medical technology, this means that when and if evictionism is adopted as the law of the land, the baby’s life will be protected during the last trimester, when it is viable outside the womb, but not during the first two trimesters, during the time that it is not capable of living on its own (even with help, of course). Hence, evictionism constitutes a compromise position between pro-life and pro-choice."

   No, it doesn't offer a "compromise position," it's a 'pro-choice' position if there ever was one. Stripped of it's pseudo-Libertarian catch-phrases, it's simply "my body, my choice" repackaged to sound appealing to the types of voters who reflexively pull the levers for anyone with an "R" after his name. And now we come  to the philosophical justification for this:

  "How, ever, do we arrive at any such position as this? We do so on the basis of private property rights. The mother is the complete and total owner of her own body. She has “mixed her labor” with this physique of hers, in the words of philosopher John Locke, hence she is the proper owner of it. What about the fetus? The unwanted pre-birth baby is a trespasser!"

  And many on the Right seriously wonder how Conservatives get the reputation of being selfish louts with no regard for the lives or welfare of others? Really? Getting pregnant is no different than signing a rental contract? A woman's body is no different than an undeveloped piece of land? As for John Locke, he'd probably vomit if he heard his name invoked with such ideals.

   As if this actually needed explaining, pregnancy is actually a 'co-ownership' to use Block's rather debased terminology. But as one can see, the whole premise of his argument is based on economics and not on actual biology. His whole concept of the family in general is a reductionist argument as a Cost-Benefit analysis based on the individual profitability of the principals involved. If anyone's inclined to doubt this, Block once elsewhere wrote that:

  "Suppose that there is a starvation situation, and the parent of the four year old child (who is not an adult) does not have enough money to keep him alive. A wealthy NAMBLA man offers his parents enough money to keep him and his family alive – if he will consent to his having sex with the child...Would it be criminal child abuse for the parent to accept this offer? Not on libertarian grounds. For surely it is better for the child to be a live victim of sexual abuse rather than unsullied and dead. Rather, it is the parent who consents to the death of his child, when he could have kept him alive by such extreme measures, who is the real abuser."

   Besides the obvious absurdity of imagining this situation occurring in real life (and we do have to wonder about Block's own inclinations in thinking it up in the first place), this same type of reasoning behind Evictionism is at play here. The child is not a human being, but a commodity; and actually by his logic, selling one's children to purchase narcotics is a perfectly rational decision. In an area near where I live, there's a missing 5-year old girl whose parents are widely suspected of having done exactly that. I strongly tend to believe that the reaction of most of Block's followers would be simply to shake their heads and say "Well that's what she gets for living in a Blue State." After all, Block argues, "Being born is merely a slight change of address."

   Bear in mind that this arrant nonsense isn't being spouted by some drugged-up Leftist at a 'woke' university: these are the sentiments of a full professor of Economics who holds a Chair at the supposedly Conservative Loyola University and another at the prestigious Von Mises Institute, at allegedly Conservative Auburn University. The only Evictionism I would favor is evicting people like this from our schools before they warp any other young minds. I'm all for the freedom of creatures like Block to express their opinions, but to take patently Leftist positions and disguise them as Conservative is a deceptive practice; and proves nothing other than that Conservative schools are just as much a dishonest racket as the 'Woke' neo-Liberal slimepits. 

   The argument that childbirth is nothing more than an economic factor is not a Conservative position, but a Neo-Marxist one. Recall that both Maoist China and the Khmer Rouge encouraged abortion and population control---as a purely economic calculation. Both Mao and Pol Pot believed that their populations were too large to be sustained so they advocated population control as a means of keeping the Collective economically viable. Block and the fake Conservatives are making the same argument except spinning it to the benefit of the individual instead of to the community. 

   This pretense isn't fooling anybody; and the Conservative Movement is not suffering politically because it is 'Pro-Life'; but because it is very much pro-abortion and trying to pose as though the lives of the unborn actually mattered to them. In reality, they embrace a variation of Social Darwinism and their only real disagreement with the Left is who should be declared 'unfit.' Our real problem, the real source of these social divisions we're experiencing is not because we're engaged in some great clash of principles, but instead we're led around by the nose by frauds who are only fighting over who gets a bigger share of the spoils. 

   Again, our problem is a spiritual one. As a society, we need to start thinking more about our accountability to God than to our earthly accountants figuring out the Bottom Line. We need to think helping our neighbors instead of helping ourselves to the Public Trough. Otherwise, nothing is going to change. 

   

   

THE FIGHT FOR LIFE ISN'T OVER

      So a week has passed since Roe vs. Wade was toppled. About a dozen states have taken action and banned abortion altogether; a few RINO-run jurisdictions are looking for loopholes; and the Whacko Left has gone on a counter-offensive. Needless to say, the Globalist Oligarchy is not pleased with this decision. Half-hearted and long-overdue as it was, the decision was a major setback for their population control schemes. Legal Abortion was never about a woman's right to choose, but about a child's right to life. 

    Now in neo-Fascist Police States like our cheery neighbors to the North in Canada---a country that's running ahead of schedule in implementing the Great Reset---action is more easily taken. Since the downfall of Roe, the Ottawa Regime has crowned all of its crimes by announcing an outright persecution of Pro-Life organizations. The Junta and its Republican enablers here envision doing the same thing.

    The Corporate Oligarchy---since it is the actual government here---is already circumventing the State laws. In conjunction with the Insurance Cartels, a growing number of Wall Street Robber Barons and NWO fanatics are putting up cash to female employees willing to fly first-class out of Right-to-Life jurisdictions and supply China with their children's fetal tissues. Dick's Sporting Goods CEO Lauren Hobart declared to MSN that "Dick’s $4,000 death benefit will also cover the travel of one support person for employees who live in states with abortion restrictions, so they can choose what is best for them." Hobart, incidentally, formerly was an executive with J.P. Morgan, PepsiCo, and Wells Fargo---all World Economic Forum 'partners.' WEF-affiliated banks and trusts control about 1/3 of Dick's Sporting Goods stocks.

    “Starbucks, Tesla, Yelp, Airbnb, Microsoft, Netflix, Patagonia, DoorDash, JPMorgan Chase, Levi Strauss, PayPal, Amazon…Reddit…Walt Disney Company, Meta…and Condé Nast,” are among the others so far offering such corporate 'perks' for infanticide, according to the New York Times. Such is the price we're paying for allowing Corporations to become more powerful than the Government. 

   The con-job that the Neocons sold us around the Turn of the Century was that economic regulation was 'socialism' and 'interfered with the Free Market.' Some of us warned that power in the hands of a Government accountable to the People was preferable to power in the hands of unelected and unaccountable financial and economic combines, but personal greed carried the day over the national interest.

  Today. the Republican leadership---which has hidden behind Roe as an excuse for inaction for nearly 50 years--- finds itself in a delicate spot. They can't continue to pose as Pro-Life without at least making a token effort to ban the procedure but they're also conspicuously not making any effort to push for a nationwide ban, or legally challenge pro-abortion States, or rein in these Corporate thugs thumbing their noses at laws protecting life. 

  Unfortunately, too, there seems to be little will among rank-and-file 'Conservatives' who, frankly speaking, for the most part could care less about babies conceived in so-called 'Blue States.' There are plenty of comments on Conservative websites such as the following:

  "I'm pro life, but I have to admit there are some people whose mothers should have chosen the alternative!!! Can imagine the welfare and crime problem we'd have if abortion had not been legal!!! Not to mention some of the worthless human beings that have infested our nation's politics the past 50 to 100 years???"

  "Federal welfare should go the same way as Roe v. Wade. If we abolish welfare, then that would go along way to stopping illegitimate births. Males in the big, Democrat-run cities commit crimes because they have no connection with the community they live in. The women don't want them either as husbands or breadwinners. They are sperm and drug donors whose purpose in life is to provide women with babies to qualify for welfare and subsidized housing. When they are rejected by their own community and they have no job skills, they prey on that community that has rejected them."

   "The Dobbs ruling is beneficial because it follows the principle of moving government away from a center so that it becomes diffuse. This increases liberty. If Plato's understanding of justice is true, those states that outlaw abortion should experience more harmony among their citizens. And those states that keep abortion legal should experience more civil disintegration to some noticeable degree. I therefore, agree with Dennis Prager: that the increased justice brought about by the Dobbs ruling will directly affect individuals, especially women, in a healthy manner."

    All of these observations betray the fact that many on the so-called Right have bought into the same Cultural Marxist mythology that Abortion is about a woman's right to choose---as opposed to a human being's right to life. The second comment in particular doesn't materially differ from policies like those in Canada where dissenters essentially are frozen out of society and left to rot on the margins. In fact, it's even more inhumane because it punishes children who have no say in the matter. 

    Dennis Prager, a thrice-divorced Neocon poltroon who fancies himself an authority on traditional families and relationships in general, was referenced in the third comment because of an article he recently penned blaming the abortion problem on men,  It illustrates too that Right has also swallowed much of the same Feminist philosophy on human sexuality even though the article's premise is allegedly anti-Feminist. 

  "Have men ever called for a sex strike" Prager snorts, "even on college campuses, where a hookup gone wrong can result in a sexual assault allegation and punishment without due process? The idea is preposterous." Actually a lot of men have: the most extreme version being the MGTOW movement. But that aside, his whole premise that  "the feminist insistence that, except for physical differences, men and women are basically the same. This includes the central feminist belief about men’s and women’s sexual natures" is responsible for the abortion problem is absurd. Both Feminism and Abortion are not premised on radical sexual egalitarianism: they based in Misandry. The hookup culture that Prager decries is practiced by people of both genders who see the opposite sex as mere sexual objects and abortion is only an incidental outcome of an already-corrupted mindset. 

   Again, our problems as a culture are neither Left or Right: they are essentially a spiritual problem. If we actually believed in the spiritual principle enunciated in our Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, then none of this would even be a debatable issue. But we've relegated such writers to Dead White Males, and the lives of the innocent unborn are still treated as expendable commodities. 

U.S. SUPREME COURT TERMINATES THE ABORTION RACKET

      Yesterday's news that the U.S. Supreme Court struck a major blow for the Rights of American gun owners was enough of a surprise; but today's news that Roe vs. Wade was overturned overshadowed even that. This is the best news I've heard since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. 

     I must confess here that I never believed that that collection of deadbeats who make up our Supreme Court and a spineless Republican Party would actually take action and do the right thing after nearly 50 years of empty talk, a few million dead babies, and fat payoffs from Big Pharma, the Insurance Cartels, and industries trafficking in fetal tissue. This should have been headline news in 1975: let's not forget that. The Whacko Left Wing is threatening action to overturn the Court's decision legislatively---something else that the GOP could have done to overturn Roe but never did. Let's not forget that either. 

   The handful of States with still-functioning Legislatures meanwhile have the opportunity to close down the Abortion Mills and save lives within their own borders, which is a positive thing. The others are going to double-down. The next step should be for the State Governors to convene a movement to introduce a Right to Life Constitutional Amendment. Unfortunately, the GOP hasn't had a strong track-record of caring too much about what happens in so-called Blue States, but we can always hope. 

   As we write this, the Whacko Left is in the beginning stages of Mass-Hysteria, and Collective (and orchestrated) outrage. I don't think it's a stretch to assume that the Great Reset crowd---the real government of the U.S.---is about to turn its Brownshirts loose on the population like they did in 2020. Expect another Summer of Hate incoming and prepare accordingly. Expect False-Flags and other vicious tactics. The Right's long history of abandoning Cultural issues to the Left still has impact which is going to be felt. 

   In other words, today's Supreme Court ruling is not the end of a fight: it's the beginning. It's up to us to seize the opportunity. Like Chattel Slavery, legal abortion has been a blot on our national history and wasn't stopped by compromising on so-called States' Rights. As Abe Lincoln said at the time "A Republic cannot exist half-free and half-slave." Likewise, we're not going to whole again if half the nation respects life and the other half disregards it. Today was a great victory for our Nation, but we have to be prepared to follow through and put the scourge of legal abortion down once and for all. The question is: do we have the will to do it?

PUTIN HUMILIATES GREAT RESET SCUM AT BRICS FORUM

      The hyenas in the Corporate Media are having serious problems these days upholding their anti-Russian rhetoric. Much like we saw during the Syrian Civil War, predictions of imminent Russian collapse begin sounding increasingly absurd as Russian victories in Ukraine continue. The Reality is hitting hardest in Europe, where once again, the exasperated population is forced to make difficult personal sacrifices for the sake of Wall Street's profit margins. Matters finally came to a head in Bulgaria today, when the pro-Great Reset Prime Minister was ejected by the Parliament. Kiril Petkov was a disciple of Tiananmen Trudeau's and loyal ally of Ukrainian puppet Zelensky and matched both in his debased character and cruel style of governing. The Bulgarian people came very close to taking matters into their own hands because of Petkov's excesses last January. Hopefully matters will improve in that country; meanwhile there is one less petty despot terrorizing an innocent population in the world. 

    Petkov's Ukrainian counterpart meanwhile is rapidly becoming the UN version of Vox Day; taking one devastating failure and loss of supporters after another and still proclaiming victory. 

   Today, Zelensky's forces took over 600 casualties, lost 51 tanks, 17 missiles shot down in the loss of a strategic salient outside the Donetsk Republic. Yesterday, they lost 520 men, 45 tanks, and 35 missiles. These are fairly typical days. All of the men, money, and material that Wall Street and the DNC throw into Ukraine is going into the Meat Grinder. Between the Left-Wing MSM telling us every day that Ukraine is winning and the Conservative MSM telling us that the Red Wave is imminent; one simply feels like taking a good book to the countryside and get a refreshing dose of Reason and Nature.

  President Putin's position incidentally is so precarious, that he left the Kremlin today to visit Beijing and address the annual BRICS Business Forum which was attended by representatives of 20 non-aligned nations. Putin gave a rough outline of the economic devastation affecting Russia since the onset of WEF-instigated embargoes:

  "In the first three months of this year, trade between the Russian Federation and the BRICS countries increased by 38 per cent – and reached USD 45 billion. Contacts between Russian business circles and the business community of the BRICS countries have intensified. For example, negotiations are underway to open Indian chain stores in Russia, increase the share of Chinese cars, equipment, and hardware on our market. ­­­ In its turn, Russia’s presence in the BRICS countries is growing.­­ There has been a noticeable increase in the exports of Russian oil to China and India. ­Agricultural cooperation is developing dynamically. Russia exports considerable amounts of fertilizers to the BRICS states. Russian IT companies are expanding their activities in India and South Africa, and our satellites enable TV broadcasting for as many as 40 million residents of Brazil.­­­ Together with BRICS partners, we are developing reliable alternative mechanisms for international settlements. The Russian Financial Messaging System is open for connection with the banks of the BRICS countries. The Russian MIR payment system is expanding its presence. ­­We are exploring the possibility of creating an international reserve currency based on the basket of BRICS currencies."­

   It's important to note that the nations compromising BRICS have about one-half of the world's population and about one-third of global economic output. Putin noted the difference in the economic approaches between Russia and the West:

  "Entrepreneurs of our countries are forced to develop their business in a challenging environment when the Western partners neglect the basic principles of market economy, free trade, and inviolability of private property. They follow, in fact, an irresponsible macroeconomic course, including the launch of the “printing press” – uncontrolled emission and accumulation of unsecured debts. At the same time more and more politically motivated sanctions are continuously introduced, mechanisms of exerting pressure on competitors are further strengthened. There is intentional destruction of cooperation ties; transport and logistics chains are destroyed. And all this is contrary to common sense and basic economic logic, it undermines business interests on a global scale, negatively affecting the wellbeing of people, in effect, of all countries.

  "As a result, the problems in the world economy become recurrent. What we see is an economic slowdown, growing unemployment, shortages in raw materials and components. Problems with ensuring global food security are getting worse; prices for grain crops and other basic agricultural products are being inflated. It is important that, despite all the problems and difficulties, BRICS business circles have been consistently enhancing mutually beneficial ties in the areas of trade, finance, and investment. For example, in the first three months of this year, trade between the Russian Federation and the BRICS countries increased by 38 per cent – and reached USD 45 billion."

   Putin is correct, of course, though the Oligarchy's parrots will dismiss all of this as Russian propaganda and the average Ameroboob will simply ignore the fact that gasoline is nearly $6 a gallon, meat, eggs, and dairy products are disappearing from supermarket shelves, drug overdoses and suicides are the highest causes of premature deaths, and 20% of the population is on welfare. And none of them can comprehend why Russia rejects American Exceptionalism when they could have homo marriage and legal marijuana. 

   The cumulative rate of inflation in the US is not something that started in January 2021: it has increased a massive 28% in the last decade since Obama proclaimed American Exceptionalism and a whopping 124% since Bush Sr. proclaimed his New World Order. Russia, meanwhile, has been backing their currency with gold which has stymied inflationary trends in that country. Putin noted this elementary fact in a speech just before departing for Beijing:

    "The worsening of the global economic situation is not a recent development. Surging inflation in product and commodity markets had become a fact of life long before the events of this year. The world has been driven into this situation, little by little, by many years of irresponsible macroeconomic policies pursued by the G7 countries, including uncontrolled emission and accumulation of unsecured debt."

  Statements like this are the real reason that the Tech Lords, High Finance and their media hirelings want to block information coming from Russia. The Oligarchs intensely dislike political leaders telling the truth instead of being compliant scapegoats. Fortunately, Russia is a superpower and Putin escapes the fate of Presidents of smaller nations who refuse to kowtow to Great Reset agendas.

  "Because they could not or would not devise any other recipes, the governments of the leading Western economies simply accelerated their money-printing machines. Such a simple way to make up for unprecedented budget deficits.I have already cited this figure: over the past two years, the money supply in the United States has grown by more than 38 percent. Previously, a similar rise took decades, but now it grew by 38 percent or 5.9 trillion dollars in two years. By comparison, only a few countries have a bigger gross domestic product...So, they printed more money, and then what? Where did all that money go? It was obviously used to pay for goods and services outside Western countries – this is where the newly-printed money flowed. They literally began to clean out, to wipe out global markets. Naturally, no one thought about the interests of other states, including the poorest ones. They were left with scraps, as they say, and even that at exorbitant prices."

   In 2006, that great Conservative, George Bush Jr., discontinued the reporting of the M3 money supply  which gave an accurate picture of how much money was actually currently in existence. As defined, "M1, M2 and M3 are measurements of the United States money supply, known as the money aggregates. M1 includes money in circulation plus checkable deposits in banks. M2 includes M1 plus savings deposits (less than $100,000) and money market mutual funds. M3 includes M2 plus large time deposits in banks," which means that since 2006, money printed for Black Budgets and government money-laundering could be warehoused without public scrutiny. Putin gives us an accurate description of how High Finance has employed this technique to bankrupt smaller countries and force their economic dependence upon Wall Street.

   "The flaw is in the concept itself, as the concept says there is one, albeit strong, power with a limited circle of close allies, or, as they say, countries with granted access, and all business practices and international relations, when it is convenient, are interpreted solely in the interests of this power. They essentially work in one direction in a zero-sum game. A world built on a doctrine of this kind is definitely unstable."

   Which is why prudent world leaders are, in increasing numbers, seeing the handwriting on the wall and are pulling away from the Great Reset's orbit and seeking shelter with Russia or China. Repressive police states like Australia and Canada are showing the end result of the New World Order behind the facade: and the current position of Europe illustrate what happens to the NWO's vassals. Putin explains that:

   "After declaring victory in the Cold War, the United States proclaimed itself to be God’s messenger on Earth, without any obligations and only interests which were declared sacred. They seem to ignore the fact that in the past decades, new powerful and increasingly assertive centres have been formed. Each of them develops its own political system and public institutions according to its own model of economic growth and, naturally, has the right to protect them and to secure national sovereignty.

  "The ruling elite of some Western states seem to be harbouring these kinds of illusions. ...They are still influenced by their own misconceptions about countries outside the so-called 'Golden Billion': they consider everything a backwater, or their backyard. They still treat them like colonies, and the people living there, like second-class people, because they consider themselves exceptional. If they are exceptional, that means everyone else is second rate. Thereby arises the irrepressible urge to punish, to crush economically  anyone who does not fit with the mainstream, does not want to obey blindly. Moreover, they crudely and shamelessly impose their ethics, their views on culture and ideas about history, sometimes questioning the sovereignty and integrity of states, and threatening their very existence. Suffice it to recall what happened in Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya and Iraq. If some 'rebel' state cannot be suppressed or pacified, they try to isolate that state, or 'cancel' it, to use their modern term. Everything goes, even sports, the Olympics, bans on culture and art masterpieces just because their creators come from the 'wrong' country."

   Which also happens to citizens of the Anglosphere who don't toe the Party Line. The Oligarchs have no respect for Human Rights in America any more than they respect them anywhere else. The problem here is that the majority of Americans also like to cling to illusions and imagine that the mere fact of being born within our borders entitles them to bask in the Elites' reflected glory. The fact that only a few thousand Americans actually control 99% of the wealth, own all of the major land, control all of the banks, media, schools, both political parties, the military, the energy sectors and most of the legal system, churches, healthcare, agriculture, and transportation---that fact rarely crosses their minds. In fact, very little crosses the average American's mind these days.

   The Great Reset represents one of the greatest threats that Civilization has faced. This is not simply because of its flawed ideology; but because it is being directed by utterly amoral and deeply unbalanced fanatics and psychopaths. Worse still, their leaders have at their disposal national militaries, mercenary scientists, and nearly unlimited wealth. 2020 showed their tendencies---they've proven that they will destroy the world if they can't control it. It's highly doubtful that, unlike the Cold War, that they would refrain from deploying Weapons of Mass Destruction. The discovery of US-backed bioweapons labs in Ukraine and the cavalier talk among CIA cutouts academic think-tanks about atomic warfare are ominous warnings of what they are capable of doing. Now more than ever we need defenders of Civilization like the BRICS countries to hold them at bay. 

   

   

THE RIGHT IN DENIAL

     A year ago, the Junta began a major push to downplay traditional American holidays and begin replacing them with new ones. Memorial Day was scarcely mentioned this year or last, while the Party's new martyr---Fentanyl Floyd---was lauded far and wide. They also dredged up an obscure State holiday, colloquially known as 'Juneteenth,' but officially as 'Emancipation Day' in venues where it actually was observed. The full official title of this holiday is Juneteenth National Independence Day; the title of which is an enshrinement of radical Critical Race Theory. The CRT advocates claim that American History began with the importation of slaves and not with the Declaration of Independence. 

   A grand total of 16 Republicans in both House and Senate combined opposed this usurpation. In fact the major headline on most Conservative sites this year featured our 80-year old nominal Head-of-State falling off of a bicycle. Not a peep of criticism about redefining American Independence: such are the priorities among the Conservative leadership these days. 

      Along that subject, some may have noticed that some of our currency has a new look. Janet Yellen, the Junta's Finance Minister stated that the new designs represent “what we value and how we’ve progressed as a society” with the Media Jackals proudly pronouncing, "The coin is helping to redefine what freedom looks like in America." The Junta has been making several of these symbolic gestures; since the first week in power when it ordered the Rainbow Flag flown as a national flag. 

    The new symbology in tandem with other events is actually defining more clearly the direction that the Regime is going. As we write this today, there are ongoing attempts to put the former administration and its supporters on trial under utterly bogus charges of treason and insurrection. There are negotiations ongoing with the World Health Organization to establish a treaty which establishes a Supranational Scientific Dictatorship as proposed by Bill Gates recently. Likewise, they are reorganizing a federal office which will set up a de facto State Censorship Board. Meanwhile, organized stormtroopers are terrorizing Supreme Court Justices, burning churches and attacking political opponents with impunity. 

   After seizing power in a way that only be described as a Regime Change, one of the Junta's first acts was to appoint John Kerry a special ambassador to enforce the WEF's agenda on Climate Change. Since then, they have been creating several other new posts---all passed over in silence by most of the Conservative Media---all of which specifically are designed to facilitate American submission to Agenda 2030. Likewise, we've seen the systematic purging of political bureaucracies; threats to withhold funding from schools and other institutions unwilling to bow to the New Order. 

   I keep asking this question of American Conservatives (and never getting an answer): "What part of the concept of a Revolution are you not getting?" Old Noah Webster, a Dead White Male who systematized our language defined a revolution as follows: "In politics, a material or entire change in the constitution of government." I may be old-fashioned here, but it seems as though things like locking down entire states, turning stormtroopers loose on society, blatantly stealing elections, threatening military coups, plotting with foreign powers, effacing our national symbols while creating new ones, inventing new 'heroes', purging governmental agencies, putting political opponents on show trials, and widespread censorship---all of these things seem to me to be revolutionary actions. 

   The American Right is facing the problem just as they've faced all of the social conflicts leading up this: they're basically looking the other way and pretending that it isn't really happening. If one gets news feeds from Conservative sites, they all basically say the same things: polls, elections, Biden-is-a-buffoon, along with whatever publicity stunt or meme just owned the Libtards. They are collectively behaving as though nothing has changed; though they can't possibly be so oblivious to reality as to imagine that Oligarchy is simply going to stand aside because people are angry over high gas prices. 

   This problem doesn't only effect the United States. Yesterday, Conservative Canadian MP Leslyn Lewis issued the following statement:

  "Conservative Party MP and leadership candidate Dr. Leslyn Lewis promised that if elected party leader and then Prime Minister she will repeal any internet censorship legislation being pushed by the Liberal Party that becomes law.

  'A Lewis-led government will repeal C-11 and any other measure the Liberals put in place to try to control our thought and speech, and let Canadians go back to exercising the freedoms that already exist in our Charter. I will restore a culture of respect for our constitution, our charter, and our inalienable gift of freedom.' Lewis said."

   C-11 is a Bill currently in the Canadian Parliament which would basically set up an agency using Government-controlled algorithms that are programmed to suppress any information the State deems 'unacceptable' while promoting sites and stories favorable to its policies. The Canadian Parliament---which is increasingly becoming synonymous with the will of Justin Trudeau---is expected to pass the measure.  

   The very idea that Tiananmen Trudeau is going to submit to a fair and free election---which would likely end up with himself on trial for Crimes Against Humanity--- is laughable. Yet Canadian Conservatives seem to believe it's possible. 

    Canada was in the process of building internment camps, brutally locking down churches, and even encouraged book-burnings before last Winter's mass-protests. Since the protests were violently crushed---likely with the assistance of foreign mercenaries---the Regime has gone to even greater extremes to consolidate its power. Censorship, border-closures, increasing gun control, purges within the Government, property ownership restrictions, and virtual nationalization of the economy have followed in the wake of the Tyrant's thirst for vengeance. 

   The protesters and their supporters themselves have been subject to the most barbaric persecutions. Essentially marginalized from Canadian society, those who haven't been locked up and held in indefinite detention are hunted down and reduced to poverty. Recently this inhuman Regime even extended legal euthanasia to what it determines the socially unfit. The Trudeau Government is actively encouraging exterminating the poor and mentally ill; something that easily could be applied to political opponents (assuming that it hasn't already). To this day we have no idea how many were murdered in the aftermath of the protests and nobody in Canada has bothered to investigate or call for any accounting for the Regime's atrocities.

   Against this backdrop, it seems that Canadian Conservatives---like their American counterparts---are believing against all Common Sense that they are going to vote their way out of this situation. Because such an attitude does defy Common Sense, it's difficult to imagine that the Conservative leadership really believes in it themselves. While it is not difficult to imagine ulterior motives among 'Conservative' leadership, it's an open question as to why so many of the mainstream Right buy into it. 

    The answer is evident when we look at the nature of Denial itself. Denial is purely a defense mechanism; a reaction to severe stress. Freud believed that Denial served an evolutionary purpose in that it blunted the trauma of the original shock and created a timeframe to come to grips with Reality and work out a solution. However, when combined with guilt, Denial takes on a pathological form. On an individual level, pathological denial manifests the following symptoms:

     In a collective sense, we can see clearly every one of these characteristic of the political Right. It is not fear of facing the Reality of the Great Reset alone which is causing this evasion, but the fear is augmented by the Guilt which would be exposed by accepting the Reality. This is because the 'Silent Majority' went along with the forces of neo-Liberalism that were gnawing away at the foundations of our civilization for decades. While Conservatives focused on looking out for #1, the Enemies of Democracy were focusing on capturing our social, political, and economic apparatuses. The events of 2020 brought all of this hypocrisy and double-dealing out in the open and today we find ourselves in the grip of a de facto (soon to be actual) totalitarian dictatorship.

   These evasions and denials will not work. They won't deceive anybody who is aware of what they are; and those who practice them will never succeed because they cannot face the root of the problem. But there is no possibility of overturning the Great Reset politically unless the problem is acknowledged. Until then, the best course of action for the rest of us is ignoring the so-called 'Left-Right Paradigm' and building strong local networks and parallel societies outside of the Regime's grasp.