WHY FATHERS DAY?

      Tomorrow, the Sunday before the Great Reset's new National Independence Day, is Fathers Day ---when the same 'woke' commercial interests who invest the rest of the year promoting the homo agenda and bashing toxic masculinity take one day off to cash in on the sentimentality of the dwindling number of Americans who actually know who their fathers were. 

  Yes, it's time to honor that special man who talked your mom out of having the abortion and who regularly made his Child-Support payments. The man who taught you valuable life-skills like how to Game the System; the virtue of going-along-to-get-along; as well as passing along the wisdom of his experience on how to turn situations to one's own advantage without getting caught. The guy who bravely protected his daughter's innocence by driving away potential suitors and teaching her how to be a strong independent woman making thousands on OnlyFans. Yes, it's time to honor that Pillar of Western Civilization: the postmodern American father.

   This time of year too, the Red Pill Cult and its orbiters like Doug Wilson and Jordan Peterson pipe up to add their two-cents' worth on how to pose as a Manly Alpha Leader, mostly be teaching husbands and fathers to be bigger bullies while still being worse deadbeats than average American fathers already are. Peterson, a Barbiturate addict whose parenting and relationship skills are not exactly traditional role models themselves brought back an old essay on what Disney's Beauty and the Beast has to teach us about relationships:

  “Beauty isn’t interested in the guy who isn’t the beast. She’s interested in the guy who is the Beast. She is interested in the guy who is the Beast who can be civilized and disciplined and who can use that in the service of a family. And that’s exactly how it should be.”

   So, as if we don't already enough problems with women chasing after mindless thugs, now we have Peterson basically encouraging the same thing. Granted in the case of most Red Pills this doctrine is making a virtue of necessity; but quite a few women have ended up dead, in hospital Emergency Rooms, or Psychotherapy, or worse because they believed it. 

   Basically what Peterson describes is the inversion of the Feminist doctrine that all men are pigs. Red Pills of the Rollo Tomassi and Vox Day stripe essentially teach men the same thing: to embrace their inner pig and live down to the Femihags' negative stereotyping as much as possible. What (normal) women actually want is what both Feminists and Red Pills derogatorily refer to as a White Knight. They don't want a Beast that they have to tame and civilize; they want a man who is already civilized and willing to fight for civilized causes---like defending his family and the Rights of others. 

    Wilson likewise has penned an intolerably tedious farrago which, while ostensibly directed at women, is a thinly-veiled testament to what Red-Pilled devotees of his cult should be looking for in a potential spouse. Fortunately for readers who have too much nonsense already to try and make sense of, blogger InsanityBytes mercifully summarized its general thesis for us:

   "What they are selling requires a certain kind of naivete, a sheltered, cloistered hapless beauty, one who has no idea she has signed up to tame a beast, a beast who of course must be her spiritual leader in the home, a beast she must respect at all times, surrender all to, all while constantly puffing up his ego, walking on eggshells, and maintaining not just her own sexual attraction, but his also."

   In the real world, I have known plenty of marriages just like this and they are rarely what any sane person would call ideal. The husband is invariably a selfish, swaggering bully and his wife is his obedient slave. The children who come out of this kind of relationship are almost always psychologically damaged from the abuse they encounter (which is sometimes physical, but overwhelmingly psychological). The daughters produced by such families are typically so emotionally wrecked that they can't carry on a normal relationship. The sons usually go one of two ways: ending up as abusive jerks themselves or struggling with Gender Dysphoria and homosexuality. Which way they go depends upon which side of the father's bullying, passive-aggressive character they develop most strongly. 

  A prominent public example of this kind of relationship is the one between Red Pill Cultist Owen Benjamin and his wife Amy. Unlike other Red Pill Cultists, Owen lacks the intelligence and prudence to keep his family dynamics out of public sight.

   A guy who burns his children's books on TV, constantly flies into drunken rages, forces his pregnant wife to drink paint thinner, and gets chased out of one neighborhood after another as an undesirable character---all the while beating his chest and proclaiming himself a paragon of Alpha Malehood---this what it looks like behind the scenes in the kinds of families promoted by the likes of Doug Wilson. Owen himself grew up in a similarly dysfunctional family and one clearly sees how both sides of the passive-aggressive bullying dynamic formed in his character: narcissism, abusiveness towards women, and latent homosexuality are all pronounced personality traits in his psychological make-up.

  Overall, Fathers Day has become somewhat of a meaningless relic on our calendars; in truth, most Americans would have to go back to their grandfathers and great-grandfathers to find an actual example of someone whom they could look back to without feeling a sense of shame. Of course, none of them were perfect either, but at least in general they lived up to their responsibilities and took their reputations and manhood seriously. That's more than most American men today can claim. 

    

  

BRIDGE LIVES MATTER

     Even as the verminous American Media continues its gloomy economic prognostications for Western countries, the Chinese Government announced the completion of a major bridge spanning the Amur River. The new bridge was a joint project with Russia and joined the two countries. Today, the Blagoveshchensk-Heihe Bridge opened for commercial traffic. At 3,600 feet long, it is longer than any bridge built in the United States since 1979. There haven't been any comparable ones constructed here in almost 15 years.

    “China is willing to continue to offer mutual support to Russia on issues concerning our core interests such as sovereignty and security, intensify strategic coordination between the two countries, and strengthen communication and coordination in major international and regional organizations such as the United Nations, BRICS, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.” President Xi Jinping stated.

   The causeway across the Amur is not even the longest bridge in China. China owns 8 of the world's 10 longest bridges---all of which were constructed within the last 20 years. It is estimated that over one million tons of goods will cross the bridge annually. The economic gain to both nations will offset the investment within only a few years.

   Meanwhile, here in the Prozac Nation, the American Society of Civil Engineers has---as it has been doing for several years now---warned against the deterioration of US bridges and our infrastructure in general. 

  "There are more than 617,000 bridges across the United States. Currently, 42% of all bridges are at least 50 years old, and 46,154, or 7.5% of the nation’s bridges, are considered structurally deficient, meaning they are in “poor” condition. Unfortunately, 178 million trips are taken across these structurally deficient bridges every day."

   The States with the most structurally unsafe bridges are Rhode Island (23%); West Virginia (21%); Iowa (19%); South Dakota (17%); Pennsylvania (16%); Maine (13%); Louisiana (13%); North Dakota (11%); Michigan (11%); Oklahoma (11%); and New York (10%). Nine other States are within a few more failing structures of making 10% as well. In Puerto Rico, only 19% of bridges are rated in Good Condition. All of these bridges are still in use, incidentally. 

   Mississippi, for example, would have a higher score except that the Trump Administration closed over 400 bridges in the state because of inspection failures. These particular bridges were constructed with timber piles---a decidedly pre-20th Century technology which though picturesque is incapable of carrying modern traffic. California finished second in number of bridge closures. In the same time period that China constructed most of its major bridges, the US has experienced 23 major bridge collapses. 

   The Trump Administration made infrastructure upgrades a key goal and a report in 2018 concluded that nearly a quarter million US bridges were in need of repair and that 46,000 were in critical condition. But Orange Man Bad: Americans decided instead to panic over a flu outbreak and Trump couldn't get an infrastructure program passed even through a Republican-controlled Congress. Most Ameroboobs of course know nothing about America's bridges and could care less. But it is an important issue for reasons even beyond safety concerns.

  For example, having decent infrastructure drastically reduces shipping costs. These unsafe and obsolete bridges often have weight restrictions which force carriers either to take longer routes or break down large shipments into smaller vehicles. Many small towns cannot invest in factories or large processing plants because of prohibitive shipping rates. The ASCE Report also notes:

   "Outside of direct safety concerns, posted bridges can dramatically increase driving time for larger vehicles such as school buses, ambulances, fire trucks, and delivery trucks, in addition to interstate trucking. In rural areas, posted bridges can prohibit the passage of emergency service vehicles, which can slow response time and impede rescue efforts."

   It's noteworthy that response times to major emergencies like wildfires and storms has slackened considerably; but few in the MSM note that delays caused by potentially impassible bridges are a significant factor. The report adds:

  "There are still over 94,000 bridges nationwide with inadequate vertical or horizontal clearances or inadequate approach roadway geometry. Such bridges do not serve current traffic demand or meet current standards, and many of these bridges act as bottlenecks, increasing congestion and crash vulnerability due to inadequate widths, lanes, or shoulders, substandard vertical clearance, or insufficient lanes for traffic demand."

   As bad as these numbers are, they may not tell the whole story since bridge inspections are currently running between 12-48 months behind schedule. Most bridges are designed for 50 years of use; the current median age of America's bridges stand at 69 years. The phony Build Back Better scheme proposed by the Junta doesn't address the problem---MSM propaganda to the contrary. The Elites are categorically opposed to strengthening private transportation.

   This is not to say, of course, that Americans themselves aren't investing in vitally important technologies,

    ...or concerned with deeply significant social issues. The top news story on Google search engine today informs us that: "Despite what TikTok may have you believe, Zendaya is not pregnant." Thankfully, the Tech Lords and Media Moguls are out there fighting that fake news! Hopefully Zendaya doesn't travel the 580 Bridge in her hometown of Oakland; because it's on the Top Ten List of California's most structurally-deficient bridges. 

     Looking at Zendaya's boyfriend, I'm not sure why anyone would imagine that he has sufficient Testosterone to impregnate anyone, but we digress. Like the vast majority of America's problems, our crumbling infrastructure is one mostly of our own making. Americans' complete lack of concern with any issue outside of their own selfish interests doesn't make constructing or upgrading bridges much of a priority. Infrastructure hasn't factored in any so-called 'key issue' polling in almost ten years. 

   So, before we start pointing the finger at China and boasting of our 'exceptionalism' we ought to remember that the Chinese aren't paying exorbitant shipping costs, or getting emergency vehicles stuck in traffic jams, or at being at regular risk of falling into rivers while on routine trips. But at least we are exceptional when it comes to avoiding Reality.

     

     

  

THE EASTERN FRONT

    With the fight for freedom and civilization rapidly deteriorating in the United States, there is some further good news from Eastern Europe. The truth about the real situation in Ukraine is rarely discussed in the Western Media, which is basically recycling all of the same anti-Russian propaganda that was running rampant during the Syrian Civil War. The so-called 'invasion of Ukraine' has always had a limited set of objectives. The first is to liberate the Republics of Donetsk and Lughansk, which have been terrorized by the thugs in Kiev for eight years. Another is to secure the territorial integrity of Crimea, the Black Sea Coast, and Transniestra. Another is to debilitate Ukraine's capability of waging further aggressive war; as well as incapacitating their ability to conduct illegal bioweapons production, their trafficking in narcotics, weapons, and sex slaves, and their ability to foment Color Revolutions abroad. 

    Most of these objectives have been achieved. Russia's top commander, Sergei Shoigu---whom the Corporate Media only recently was claiming had been purged by Putin---announced last week that Ukrainian forces had been driven from 97% of the Lughansk Republic; and that Black Sea ports and railway links to Crimea had been repaired after Western-backed mercenaries had sabotaged them. 

     Ukraine no longer has an air force, a navy, a special forces unit, or much of an army left. The bulk of their troops either defected to, or surrendered to Russian forces very early on in the conflict. Most of their defenses now are both manned and armed by Islamic Extremists, neo-Nazi militias, and foreign troops from Western countries who are posing as Ukrainian regulars. This is the identical tactic that the WEF-backed Corporate Regime attempted in Syria. These mercenaries have been committing innumerable atrocities upon the Ukrainian populace, which our Corporate Media blames on the Russians despite UN observers reporting to the contrary.

    Recent Russian military actions in Georgia, Syria, and now Ukraine have been conducted with a plan to reduce civilian casualties and preserve vital infrastructure. Unlike the Pentagon, whose 'strategy' is simply blasting anything that moves and reducing countries to rubble (and afterwards securing fat reconstruction contracts for their cronies on Wall Street); Russian strategy necessarily moves at a much slower pace. That has led some of our MSM's defense experts to conclude that Russia is losing the war---another propaganda tactic from Syria. The fact is that it's been Ukraine's nominal government which has been begging anyone who'll listen for a Peace Treaty. Russia has agreed to it---but with unconditional terms. That's hardly the position of a losing power in a war. 

   

    Never ones to let a good crisis go to waste, however, the Agribusiness Cartels are using the crisis in Ukraine to inflate global wheat prices artificially. In fact, Wall Street insisted upon the Ukrainian Government putting up its grain reserves as collateral and they're sitting upon stockpiles of foodstuffs which they refuse to relinquish to the population. The objective behind doing this is not only to maximize profits for themselves; but to punish the people of Europe (where sanctions have hit severely) for protesting against Scamdemic restrictions earlier this year. The Fake News in the Corporate Media that Russia has been destroying grain crops has been disproven by UN observers but not reported. Even if it were true, the loss of Ukraine as a grain supplier would be miniscule on the world market. These horror stories of famine are being promoted by the same Corporate interests who control both Big Media and the Agribusiness Cartels. 

   The same Corporate Government falsehoods are being spread about the phony 'oil shortages' allegedly driving up prices. This is the same excuse that justified oil price hikes when Russia intervened in Georgia and Syria. Only about 10% of US oil imports came from Russia even before the sanctions. In an actual Free Market where Supply and Demand---instead of Crony Capitalism---determined prices, the loss of Russian oil would have amounted to about a 15-cent increase per gallon at 2021 prices. There is no Oil Shortage: again the Oligarchs are stockpiling petroleum to try and force dependence on captive markets. 

   

     Now, unfortunately the average Ameroboob jumped on the pro-Ukraine bandwagon with all of the unquestioning herd loyalty that they exhibited during the COVID hysteria and the George-Whats-His-Name Riots. With Ukraine close to being liberated the Elites are trying to shift all of this drug-fueled pent-up libidinal outrage in a new direction. With some upcoming Supreme Court decisions and the conveniently timed January 6th Show-Trials, we're starting to see acts of violence portending a staged 'reaction' against Trump Supporters and other elements of the Constitutionalist  extreme Right. Several Republican Offices and Family-Planning Clinics have been firebombed on the West Coast; a Supreme Court Justice threatened and a few rather phony-looking 'right-wing terror plots' have been popping up in the Corporate Media.

   A la 2020, it appears that the Regime is gearing up to release its stormtroopers upon the nation to strike terror into the Junta's opponents. Unfortunately, as we also saw in 2020, intimidating American Conservatives isn't at all a difficult matter to accomplish. 

   The only real leader that the American Right has left is the President-in-Exile Trump; and the whole goal of the January 6th Show Trials is going to be beating both him and what is left of his supporters into submission---which is about the final step the Junta needs to complete consolidation of its power. We've said here since the beginning of the Color Revolution---for that is what the events of 2020  really were all about---that the so-called 'First Term' of the Junta would be directed at creating a one-party State and that all of this nonsense about a Red Wave was simply a delusion. Right-Wing populism will be crushed under the Great Reset's jackboot. Lest the Left start celebrating prematurely, they had better come to the realization that they'll be crushed shortly afterwards. The Great Reset is an utterly amoral concept and the only ideology it cares about is whatever serves the interests of its leadership. 

   This is the actual basis for the West's 'support' for Ukraine: it is completely driven by a hatred for Russia which has been standing in the way of the Oligarchy's Imperialist designs. The disaster to which the Elites have brought the Anglosphere and Europe is exactly what they have in mind for Russia. It is also the reason behind their blind hatred for Trumpism and what it represents. The Elites don't really give two hoots about Ukrainian Sovereignty or Woke American Politics; both are wholly expendable and being employed as means to the Elite's ends. Even China is starting to wake up to the reality that their previous support for the Junta and the WEF Agenda was a devil's bargain. The Western Oligarchy has no intention of sharing anything with Xi Jinping, the Communist Party of China, or anybody else. 

   Whether American Conservatives like it or not, Russia is the one power standing between the survival of Western Civilization and threat of Globalist Barbarism. We need to stand behind leaders like Vladimir Putin who is one of the few among Western leaders who understand the threat.

    

IDAHO PROUD

     A topic that has been garnering some attention among 'Conservative' websites this past week had to do with a so-called Pride Event hosted last weekend in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. Coeur d'Alene is an allegedly 'red' city in a 'red' state, so we might have expected some opposition to such a display in a public park; a spectacle which despite featuring every imaginable disgusting gender-bending perversion bills itself as a family-friendly event. 

   The great victory that the Right is claiming here is that their public pressure forced the Temple of Satan to withdraw sponsorship of the event. That didn't stop the event from actually happening: the huge influx of local tourists is good for the bottom line (no pun intended in this case) of the very Conservative local community. Principle shouldn't stand in the way of profit, after all, if one is a political 'realist' as most on the Right apparently are these days. One even might suspect that the only real opposition to the cult's sponsorship is that the other sponsors didn't want to be associated with it: cults are bad for business, but embracing the Rainbow Agenda; that's a different story. 

      Sponsorship of a spectacle like Pride in the Park is something one would rather expect from a Satanic Temple, and even from a few local crackpot business leaders like Numerica Credit Union's CEO Carla Cicero whom, according to Open Secrets, is a prolific donor to Never-Trump wingnuts. 

     But no one seems to be in the least disturbed that at least four churches were also listed as sponsors. Specifically, the Community of the Holy Spirit in Coeur d'Alene; Calvary Lutheran Church of Post Falls, Idaho; Community United Methodist Church of Coeur d'Alene; and St. Luke's Episcopal Church of Idaho Falls. Nor did it raise any eyebrows that local family-friendly enterprises like the Community Library Network, the Coeur d'Alene Public Library, and the Museum of North Idaho were also listed as sponsors. It's also quite interesting that schools were represented too, in the form of student Gender and Sexuality Clubs (GSAs). In fact the Coeur d'Alene High School even has such an organization. Here's how it's own website describes it:

•    "The GSA club is a student-run organization where students of any orientation can meet in a safe, supportive environment. At our weekly meetings (Tuesdays from 2:30-3:30 pm, room N-1) we discuss issues ranging from acceptance within our own school to LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) rights worldwide. We seek to create a welcoming atmosphere that is open to all high school students where they can be who they are without fear of repercussions. Our goals are to further spread tolerance and acceptance in both the school and community. Joining the club is not a statement about your preferences or gender identity; rather it is a statement of your commitment to human rights and dignity...Look for the Safe Space stickers below in classrooms and offices throughout the school. These are places where you can find staff who specifically identify themselves as someone you can go to where everyone is welcome - no matter their gender or sexual orientation."

   What about the Backbone of Traditional America, the small business community? About what one would expect from a group that not only distinguished itself by excessive kowtowing to Scamdemic restrictions, but actively locked up anyone who dared defy the RINO Governor Brad Little. Thus we see an interesting collection of local businesses: photographers, wedding designers, caterers, and even an adoption agency. Clark's Diamond Jewelers of Coeur d'Alene which boasts in its advertising propaganda of its traditionalism: 

  "Clark’s is one of the very few old school family jewelers still in their original location at 307 Sherman Avenue in beautiful downtown Coeur d’Alene. For 111 years now, Clark’s has developed long-term relationships with their customers..." 

...as well as Spokane-based Ecogoat Design, which on its website lauds its support for Assumption Catholic School. To conclude this rather depressing display of hypocrisy, it should also be noted that the Administration of the aforementioned Governor Little and his GOP-controlled legislature actually subsidizes events like Pride in the Park. 

  I would be willing to wager that someone interviewed residents of Kootenai County---the local jurisdiction for Pride in the Park; and which incidentally voted 71% for President Trump in 2020---a substantial number would solemnly swear that they had no idea that anybody in the county supported any of these goings-on; or, if they actually did happen, it was only because of a few isolated individuals on the Left.  

     Yes: getting the Satanic Temple to drop their support so that the Right could appear more LGBTQ Friendly and make a profit on the side, what a great watershed moment for the Conservative bid to take back the culture. We sure showed them, didn't we? 

   

   

OF MAY AND DECEMBER

     The other day, I was perusing a site on the Blogroll which deals with relationships. A commenter there was relating a story, and one sentence really caught my attention; mostly because I hear far too much of this kind of thing aimed at men. He writes: "It was different with my wife. I’m 9 years older than she is. One co-worker described me as a 'cradle-robbing son-of-a bitch.'" I have to confess that if some guy had said something like to me, the bandages on his nose afterwards would have taught him to mind his tongue in the future, not to mention minding his own business. 

    Unfortunately, we here in the Anglosphere live in zeitgeist where people are conditioned not to mind their own business---especially where sexuality and relationships are concerned. This works out fine for people in so-called alternative lifestyles because such people crave public attention. For the rest of us, not so much. 

   At some point during the last generation, age differences in romantic relationships became socially taboo (at least among heterosexuals). Nobody seems to know why they should be taboo: one would think that in a culture as emasculated as ours would respect a man who was still sexually functional at middle age or beyond. But---as with most postmodern social prohibitions---it's something that people just accept (and become infuriated about) without knowing or caring why.

   To illustrate this point, let us take a hypothetical example. Suppose I was involved in a relationship with a woman 5, 10, or even 20 or more years my junior. How exactly does that effect you? How exactly does it effect our community, our nation, our culture, or our civilization?

    If most denizens of the Anglosphere were struck with a sudden and involuntary spasm of Reason, they might question why glorifying Lesbianism 24/7 to a young woman is harmless, but an older man showing normal romantic interest in her is somehow a grave threat to her innocence and purity. I suspect that this social attitude is driven by three fundamental causes:

   1. Widespread subconscious guilt over failed parenting. 

   2. Sexual Jealousy. 

   3. Cultural contempt for Privacy Rights in general. 

   The first of these is especially pronounced among a certain class of men who have young daughters. Inevitably, they're the loudest ones about how protective they are of their own (and everybody else's) daughters---even though it typically turns out that their extent of fatherhood was getting Visitation Rights on weekends and holidays, and paying Child Support. These types invariably project their own attitudes towards women on any romantic interest their daughter might develop, and the closer her love interest is to her father's age, the worse the projection gets. Her love for another man closer to her father's age is an obvious threat to a failed father's ego.

  Sexual jealousy needs very little explanation: it's particularly pronounced among both male and female Feminists as well as among latent and open homosexuals. Since Envy has been elevated to more or less of a virtue in Postmodern society, those who for whatever reason fail in relationships feel justified in attacking and denigrating whatever relationship others have that they desire. 

  This type of Envy isn't restricted however to the sociopolitical Left: it's fairly deeply entrenched among many on the Right. The Manosphere, especially among the Game/PUA cultists, is filled with the same sort of malicious hatred. Their accusing fingers typically point at the woman instead of the man; but the Envy motivating them is fairly obvious. 

   The third centers on our systemic suspicion of Privacy, which incidentally effects heterosexual relationships in general today. We see this especially in the generations who've grown up post-9/11. Part of intimacy is sharing our deepest selves exclusively with another person. Younger people have been conditioned reflexively to fear anything that isn't open to public exposure and criticism. Degenerate academics and media perverts---alongside the terrible examples set by their Boomer/Gen X parents---has also implanted a deep sexual negativity among younger people. They've largely been educated to see heterosexuality as something shameful, dirty, and even perverse: in their eyes, it's a dark world full of unknown risks, exploitation, abuse, and worst of all (to them), social disapproval. 

   Along with the erosion of Privacy, there has also arisen within our culture an unhealthy aspect of voyeurism, of which our first two points also play a prominent role. This is obvious from our media coverage of sex scandals and sex crimes. To put it bluntly, we've become a nation of Peeping Toms and most of these news stories, documentaries, and analyses are little more than soft-core pornography for the sexually frustrated to weave lurid fantasies around. 

  So, my advice to the commenter would be this: understand what is motivating your critics, and that you are grounded in Reality and they are not. Also, outside of your relationship, build a new network of friends and associates who are also grounded in Reality. We're not living in normal times, so one must act accordingly without compromising what one believes in and stands for. 

     

WHAT A DRAG

     Just in case anybody hasn't noticed, June---formerly the traditional month for weddings---has been replaced with so-called Pride Month. Actually, this began under Obama and a GOP-controlled Congress and subsequent Administration refused to do anything about it. Since the Junta seized power in January 2021 what looked like a Homo Juggernaut in 2014 has turned into a permanently-embedded New Normal. 

  To this sad state of affairs, the Conservative punditocracy has responded. To read the title Should We Normalize Sexual Deviance is alone enough to understand the whole article. It's more a commentary on the true state of the American Right than anything else. Here's the opening paragraph:

  "At the recent National Art Education Association convention, the presenters of a session dealing with “LGBTQ+ artists” began with the rather startling declaration that “we owe it to our kids to normalize these identities.” Not one of the more than 230 other registrants for the session questioned that assertion. I find it deeply troubling, however."

  Really? Yes, it is deeply troubling. But: it's been deeply troubling now for a long time. In fact, I recall questions and concerns about normalizing deviance being raised during the Clinton Administration. Contrary to what this pundit seems to imply, pushing the Homo Agenda on children didn't just start last year. 

  I've really become exasperated listening to this kind of rubbish coming from the so-called Conservatives. Less than a decade ago, these same hypocrites were looking the other way when Obama's thugs were locking up the (few) officials who resisted so-called 'marriage equality.' Many more were forced to resign, though that was rarely reported. Some of us haven't forgotten that.

  Polls have shown that a sizable plurality of Millennials and an even larger slice of Gen Z identify as 'non-binary.' How do we suppose this happened? Maybe staging so-called 'Pride Parades' for decades in every city street? Or flying rainbow flags from every public building? Not to mention the proliferation of the Homo Agenda in the schools, media and organizations like the Boy Scouts. Anybody under the age of 20 has had this deviance shoved in their faces since they were born. 

  Don't tell me any more that nobody knew. Everybody knew it. 'Conservative' parents were telling their kids to "go along to get along" and game the system like they were doing---laughing up their sleeves all the while at the 'chumps' who stood up and sacrificed for a principle---now these same people want to clutch their bowties and shriek that this isn't the result that they wanted. 

  It seems that the author dimly senses this fact, and so takes to waffling on the issue: another tendency of the Postmodern Right. She says:

 "The principle enunciated by Martin Luther King, Jr., with respect to race is also relevant here. Our focus should always be on the caliber of the character—and achievements—of the individual, not on group identity. That meritocratic principle has been at the core of American greatness. It is currently under assault by woke warriors, however, for allegedly promoting white supremacy.The LGBTQ issue highlighted here is but one expression of the present “woke” obsession with group identities that now pervades art education, as well as virtually every other arena of American life and Western society in general. To successfully oppose it, it is crucial to recognize that it is rooted in neo-Marxist ideology deliberately aimed at undermining democratic societies by sowing division."

   Is this kind of 'spin' actually fooling anybody? With a complete ignorance of both history and psychology, her basic argument boils down to a rationalization for the Right's complete failure in defense of our own culture. All that she's really saying here is that "our acceptance of deviance is based on principle; unlike the Left's, which is predicated on Identity Politics." In other words, it's only wrong when they do it. This kind of evasion explains how the Right actually sees (or pretends to see) a difference between Rachel Levine and Bruce Jenner. 

    I prefer following the principle elucidated by Cicero which is more relevant here: "The public welfare is the Supreme Law." The welfare of a Civilization depends upon the strength of its families, which in turn depends upon gender parity. Blurring the distinctions between genders is neither equality nor progress: it is a social regression back to the Jungle---back to the ape as the Evolutionists would say. A Conservative position is not only not to 'normalize' this behavior, but not to tolerate it either and certainly not to celebrate it. 

  In the comments section somebody wrote: "I think it’s possible for kids to be taught to be tolerant, respectful, kind, and to mind their own business, without normalizing sexual deviance. I think that’s what we should do." Fine, except that's exactly what the Left is doing. How do teach tolerance for sexual deviation without exposing children to it? The commenter's statement is another example of rationalizing. It's basically saying that parents who look the other way and teach their offspring to go with the flow are actually subliminally teaching tolerance and individualism. 

  All of this strain of evasion and rationalizing is as bad as those Churchians, who during the Scamdemic thought it expedient not to protest the wholesale embargo on religious assemblies and tried to justify their cowardice by claiming that they were taking the Moral High Ground but not wishing to offend believers who thought that the Pandemic was real. We could have done what our forefathers did during previous epidemics: left the Churches open and the ministers visited the homes of those whose fear of contagion caused them to self-quarantine. Somehow nobody thought of doing that. 

  The real reason that we're hearing this kind of thing from the Right is because---at least on a subconscious level---everybody realizes that the situation is out of control and nobody wants to confess their own guilt in allowing it to happen. That is also the reason that nobody is taking the Conservative movement of today seriously. Even at modern lowered levels of discernment, most people realize that Conservatives stand for nothing except saving their own egos. Until we understand that trying to beat the Left at their own game doesn't work and start standing upon the principles that we profess, we're going to keep losing.

     

PUSILLANIMOUS ELITES FRAMING THE GUN DEBATE

     So this week, the gang over in Davos have been holding their annual WEF meeting. Appropriately, they're meeting during so-called Pride Month, and as a show of respect for his Masters the nominal American Head-of-State has vowed to starve out schoolchildren who attend schools refusing to bow to the Rainbow Agenda. Most Americans already have forgotten that one of the Junta's first acts was raise the Rainbow Flag to the status of a national flag as well as appointing John Kerry as a special ambassador to the WEF. 

    Evidently these same unelected Oligarchs have been pressing their satraps in Washington and Ottawa to do something about the laws permitting private ownership of firearms, because both the Junta and Tiananmen Trudeau have introduced new restrictions curbing our fundamental rights to own defensive weapons. Trudeau, who is a dictator in all but official name, simply ruled new restrictions by decree although his Rump Parliament still may have to pass a token vote approving them. In the US, the Controlled Opposition vowed to filibuster any new restrictions and then---less than 24 hours later---completely capitulated to the White House. The US has seen about a half-dozen mass-shootings during the last week which has been adding to the public hysteria.

   Now, as mentioned in our previous post, it's likely only a sheer coincidence that these outbreaks of violence just happen to occur during a national debate on gun control, as well as during a WEF conclave that was earlier postponed because of anti-globalist protests in well-armed Switzerland. The mere fact that both Biden and Trudeau have no problem with shipping arms to Ukraine and to the Middle East to murder Russians and Syrians shouldn't be grounds for suspicions that they would incite violence against their own citizens for political gain. Yes, Trudeau did gather mercenaries to massacre protesters in Ottawa recently (we still don't know how many people were killed or where the Regime's stormtroopers actually came from). And, true, we've also heard quite a bit of strident and violent rhetoric from the American Left during the last 18 months as to what should be done to opponents of our own Autocracy. All that actually matters is that Ameroboobs are outraged about gun violence---despite the fact that one's chances of dying in an auto accident are higher than being randomly shot in public---and our public servants absolutely must attend to the problem. 

   In Canada, where mass-shootings are relatively rare anyway, it's unknown what public opinion regarding the new restrictions actually is. Canada has evolved to the point where one group---specifically the Ruling Class---thinks for everybody. At least no one in their de facto state-run Media has questioned why a country with so little gun violence (at least among civilians, that is; in today's Canada one has a better chance of being shot down by the authorities than by actual criminals) needs any gun control. 

     Trudeau's latest act of tyranny prohibits the sale or transfer of any handgun within his domain; which is, of course, the last step before outright confiscation. The U.S. is probably 2-5 years away from reaching the level of general repression that Canada is experiencing right now. Despite whatever the impotent American Right wishes to believe, our culture is well-primed for Canadian-style tyranny. Just recall how simple it was to lock down an entire country and the great compliance shown to Mask and Vaxx Mandates and that is a fair picture of what will really happen when the Junta decides to go full-on with gun control. Neighbors will denounce neighbors; nobody will take a stand for fear of losing economic or social position and our 2nd Amendment will be gone just like the rest of the Bill of Rights. 

    It's difficult to predict how far the Junta and their Republican collaborators will go with this upcoming round of restrictions. It is likely going to be fairly severe relative to other recent legislation. The one thing that we can be sure of is that it won't meet with any significant resistance. Consider that even in a ruby-red state like Florida, fisheries are in danger of being closed because of the levels of narcotics present in coastal waters. 

   Actually, both Americans and Canadians should be a lot more concerned about the fact that our combined national drug-addiction rates have become so rife that it's creating environmental impacts. That also includes the fact that there are strong causalities between narcotics and mass-shootings. But that issue has become a third rail topic in our Corporate Media. Especially recently a trope of censors fact-checkers are denying any ties between dope use and mass violence. The Corporate Media however doesn't mention its own ties to Big Pharma---which constitutes it's largest advertising base---or to the Marijuana Industry, which is heavily invested in by the same banks and trusts which own large portions of media stock. Just another one of those coincidences that the settled science always somehow benefits the Corporate Oligarchy.