ALPHA-BOY JON DEL ARROZ FLEES HIS OWN PROTEST

     Jon Del Arroz, crony of Vox Day and notorious internet gadfly, organized a rally at WorldCon 76 to protest getting banned from that organization in January. Del Arroz has been howling for the last several months that 'SJW's at WorldCon banned him for his politics, and not because he openly defied them to do it. 

     So, Saturday in San Jose, the Red Pills are scheduled to hold the Predators Out Now Patriots Rally Against Pedophiles in Sci-Fi demonstration. Yesterday, however, the Bay Area legions of Antifa announced that they would be holding a counter-protest. Manly Alpha Leader Del Arroz suddenly decided for 'health reasons' to make a beeline out of town:

     "Unfortunately due to family health reasons, I'll be unable to attend any further WorldCon-related events this weekend. I have to leave the area because of heavy smoke and poor air quality. Health takes a priority."  he noted at his blog. 

FYI:

   
    "The protest against pedophilia is still on," he continues, "And there's expected to be a sizable turnout. They have my full support..."

     Sure, Jon. Anyway, Del Arroz has assured us that the protest will be in the capable hands of one 'Erin Sith'---a trans-man who hangs around the Red Pill Movement and is known for rather unladylike behaviors like getting into fistfights with Antifa. He will be joined by the latent-homosexual gang, The Proud Boys. All of this motley group is ostensibly fighting for traditional values in American literature. 

     This isn't the first time that Del Arroz has hidden behind Mr. Sith's skirts. He recently noted on his blog that:

      "Erin has also very kindly offered to escort me to Bay Area Science Fiction conventions in the future for my safety's sake. Thanks, Erin!"

      What a pathetic excuse for a man. If you're planning to attend today's protest, that is the level of leadership you can expect. 

       It's doubtful anyway that Del Arroz' protests and tantrums will amount to anything anyway. He and Vox Day were totally wiped out in the first round of the Dragon Awards nominations recently. As those awards are reader-nominated, it's hard for either of those two to pretend that they're somehow being blacklisted by the industry.

      The Red Pills are fakes through and through. They don't represent any 'alternative' to anything. 

      

    


  

ISIS WAR CRIMINAL CAUGHT IN CALIFORNIA

     In the 'Sanctuary City' of Sacramento yesterday, FBI and ICE agents raided the apartment of 45 year-old Omar Ameen. Ameen is an Iraqi national who was in the country as a legal alien, who settled in Sacramento under Obama's Refugee Resettlement Program. He was in the process of applying for Permanent Residency when taken into custody. 

     The problem? It turns out that Ameen is wanted in Iraq for war crimes committed while in the service of the ISIS Caliphate. Iraq's Ministry of Justice alleges that Ameen, a native of Rahwa, Anbar Province, was a known member of Al-Qaeda prior to the rise of the Caliphate. Ameen joined ISIS and rose to become a commander. He returned to his hometown with a gang of thugs and murdered a local police chief who'd put him on a Watch List. The Iraqi Government states, on witness testimony, that during the ISIS Occupation of Rahwa, Ameen participated in numerous crimes including deploying IED's to murder soldiers and civilians alike. 

     KCRA-3 News in Sacramento obtained a social media post of Ameen and his ISIS cohorts boasting about the murder. They also reported that Iraqi witnesses believe that Ameen was involved in a 2006 murder at the Karaballa Military Base.

     Didn't Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry assure us that there were no terrorist infiltrators among the refugees? Apparently they were wrong. They did, however, deny Iraqi and Syrian Christians refugee status. The Liberal Deep-Statists were uncomfortable about allowing any more Bronze Age Bigots into the country; but Al-Qaeda and ISIS members fit in much better with their ideology and political goals. 

     In January, Sacramento Mayor Daniel Steinberg boasted that his city "would join, if not lead, any effort to fight threats against Sanctuary City status with litigation...That's the only stand to take on behalf of this city; which turned out 25,000 people to Capitol Mall : a city which prides itself on its incredible diversity!" Steinberg has been rather quiet about this incident, however. The Corporate Media has been trotting out the predictable "shocked neighbor" stories and legal 'experts' questioning whether or not Ameen's civil rights are being violated. 

     But it's good to know that, for once, we actually have a Federal Government willing to stand up to the PC 'narrative' and do the right thing. If convicted in Iraq, Ameen faces a sentence of death by hanging. 

     

   

NEW MEXICO JUDGE RELEASES TERRORISTS

    Last Friday, authorities in New Mexico raided a makeshift compound in the Taos area on a tip that a 3 year-old kidnap victim was being held there. The police found 11 teenagers and children living in squalid conditions; essentially being brainwashed to commit terrorist activities. The kidnap victim was dead, according to forensic doctors themselves, a casualty of a cult-like ritual murder. A gang of Wahhabi fanatics who ran this hecatomb were arrested. 

    Admittedly, when this story first broke last weekend, we didn't give it the attention that it deserved. During the Syrian Civil War, stories about these types of compounds were fairly routine, especially during the Battles of Deir Ezzur and Mosul. ISIS had a network of facilities kidnapping children and turning them into suicide bombers. The Allies managed to rescue most of the victims. The ISIS operatives running the compounds, though, were usually put up against a wall and shot. 

      But here in the US, the Whacko Left Wing doesn't see groups like the Jihadists as much of a threat. At least, so said Judge Sarah Backus. According to KOB-TV 4 in Albuquerque, Judge Backus released some suspects on bail because there was insufficient evidence to hold them in jail. They were held on $20,000 bond---no word on who paid the bail. It didn't help two of the suspects, though. The thug who kidnapped the deceased 3 year-old has a federal warrant for that crime, and one of harlots of that same thug was picked up by ICE on an immigration charge. 

       Outside of New Mexico, though, this story has gotten about as much Mainstream Media attention as the previous atrocities in Syria did. The Left is busy obsessing over some new White House 'scandal' about the President belching at the dinner table, or muttering a racial slur in his sleep, or something. But to the Corporate Media, things like cults kidnapping and abusing minors and practicing ritual killings are a normal part of day-to-day life and no really big deal.

      Judge Backus is reportedly getting threats over the decision; and the media is getting outraged over that. We don't, of course, endorse that sort of behavior. Threatening a sitting judge is an very serious offense, and rightly so. There are legal remedies for these kinds of injustices and they should be pursued instead. 

       

HUNGARY BANS GENDER STUDIES' COURSES

       President Trump and Education Secretary DeVos, please take note. The Hungarian Government announced today that it was abolishing Gender Studies courses in their university system. The schools affected includes one founded by international arch-criminal George Soros.

     Dr. Bence Retvari of the Hungarian Secretary of State's office stated that "university degrees must rely on a scientific basis for their existence. Gender Studies, an offshoot of Marxism and Leninism, must be termed an ideology instead of a science." 

    A press spokesman concurred, stating further that subjects such as Gender Studies serve no national or economic interest and are consequently a waste of taxpayer funds. All that we can add to this is that attitudes like these are desperately needed in the United States too. Gender Studies here are not only a waste of valuable tax-funds; they are incubators of the worst breeds of social parasites. Up until the 1990's, Gender Studies' departments and degrees were practically nonexistent in the US. They spread like wildfire---with metaphorically the same disastrous results---under the instigation of Hillary Clinton, Donna Shalala, Janet Reno, and Johnetta Cole. 

     Naturally, Hungary's decision caused an explosion of outrage among Europe's Cultural Marxists. The American Media---except for some Conservative-leaning outlets---has largely ignored the story lest it give politicians over here any ideas. The commentary on most of these sites has been overwhelmingly supportive of Retvari's policy.  

      Wonderful news to start off the week. Let's just hope our politicians follow Hungary's lead. 

DALROCK AND HIS MORAL PYGMIES VS. DOUGLAS WILSON

     Dalrock, a Red Pill blogger whose main effort seems to be undermining faith in traditional Christianity, has gone on the attack (again) against the Rev. Douglas Wilson of Moscow, Idaho. Granted, the Reverend Wilson is a controversial figure. But Dalrock takes on Wilson over this article,  wherein Wilson answers one of Dalrock's acolytes on the question of broken marriages. 

       Dalrock and others who worship the Red Pill hold to the extreme position that a wife is never morally justified in leaving a husband under any circumstances. Wilson shows (correctly) that the references that the Red Pills employ to support their positions refers to Christian converts within pagan marriages. These positions rely largely upon a misreading and misunderstanding of a few passages which the Red Pills contort to fit the misogynist philosophies underlying their entire cult. 

      For example, Dalrock chides Wilson for 'ignoring' a passage in the 1st Epistle of St. Peter (iii:5-6). This reads in many versions: "For after this manner, the holy women of old also trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection to their own husbands. Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord, and whose daughters you are, as long as you do well, and are not afraid with any amazement." 

     The Red Pills point to some of Abraham's lapses in faith---even nearly giving Sara to another man twice.  In the Greek however, we get a better understanding of the context:  "Thus once when the holy women, those expecting God, accustomed themselves to being under their own husbands. As Sara obeyed the Master Abraham, him calling upon Him whose children you have become; and the ones doing good, not fearing anything nor in dismay."

     As an example of supreme faith, St. Peter here praises Sara---through whom it was promised Israel and subsequently the Messiah. Sara obeyed Abraham because she trusted God---Who ultimately did intervene. An analogous situation would be Abraham's faith when commanded to sacrifice Issac. 

     Contrary to what these cultists believe, the Catechism explains: "According to Faith, the disorder we notice so painfully does not stem from the nature of men and women; nor from the nature of their relations, but from sin. As a break with God, the first sin had as its first consequence a rupture in the relations between man and woman. Their relations were distorted by mutual recriminations; their mutual attraction---God's own gift---changed into a relationship of domination and lust." (Pt.ii; sec.2, ch.iii:1607). From the Garden of Eden to August, 2018 that passage describes the Red Pill and Feminism perfectly. 

      The Red Pills see sin only in one-dimensional terms: that the nature of women tends to sin and tends to lead men into sin. They overlook any possibility that the actions of a man could destroy a relationship, thus they accuse Pastor Wilson of "trying to straddle two horses; the Word of God and the feelings of women." As if somehow, the two things are by moral necessity mutually exclusive.

       The Catechism further schools the Red Pills in verse 1609 loc. cit.: "In His Mercy, God has not forsaken sinful man. The punishments consequent upon sin, 'the pain of child-bearing' and 'toil in the sweat of your brow' also embodies remedies limiting the damaging effects of sin. After the Fall, marriage helps overcome self-absorption, egotism, pursuit of one's own pleasure; and to open oneself to the other, to mutual aid and self-giving."

      In Dalrock's twisted world-view, marriage contains no such remedies; but is solely based upon the aforementioned sins of "domination and lust." Love---which is the basis of both our relationships to others as well as to God---is noticeably absent in all Red Pill teachings. 

       Because both genders are subject to sin, each has the potential of destroying a marriage by perverting its meaning. The Church teaches that the family is a microcosm of the wider communion of saints. Consequentially, either spouse has an indefeasible right to terminate the union, or temporarily separate, in order that the dignity of marriage be preserved. Women are not morally forced to endure beatings, enslavement, adulterous behavior by their husbands, abuse of children, criminal behavior, etc. Part of the Church's mission is to help such people---not make things worse for them. 

THE DOWNFALL OF ALEX JONES, PART II

      This story is not going away anytime soon. Since our last post, Google Podcast, I-Heart Radio, Linkedin, Disqus, and several lesser-known sites have cut ties in some way with Alex Jones and Infowars. This has all stirred up a huge controversy; with some claiming purges and censorship on one side to others calling for more purges and censorship on the other. 

      We need to step back and have some sensible dialogue about this, because it doesn't bode well for the future of Free Speech otherwise. 

      As we pointed out yesterday, this unprecedented, mass-attack on a single media outlet is probably motivated by legal liability issues more than anything else. A spokesman for Facebook said: "While much of the discussion of Infowars has been around false news... none of the violations that spurred today's removals were related to this."

     Apple stated officially: "Apple does not tolerate hate speech, and we have clear guidelines that creators and developers must follow to ensure a safe environment for all of our users."

      Youtube stated their reason as "repeatedly violating our policies against hate speech and harassment or our terms prohibiting circumvention of our enforcement measures." This last phrase is especially telling. It's also interesting that Youtube and Apple both strongly suggest harassment as a reason, and it could also could be deduced as a motive from Facebook's statement. Which leads us back to allegations made against Jones in the Sandy Hook lawsuit. 

     This same thing happened nearly a year ago with the mass-banning of the sick Red Pill site, The Daily Stormer. Andrew Anglin, who ran the site was also being sued for harassment and libel---in two different lawsuits. (He recently lost the latter case.) The debate then also swirled around free speech. But the point here is that with Rights come responsibilities. We can't be responsible for how some use our words, but egging on people to commit acts of harassment and violence can't be excused. This goes for Left-Wing agitators too. Keith Olbermann nearly got the same treatment as Anglin and Jones got, but discreetly bailed out voluntarily before the hammer came down. 

      Let's not forget that, in the middle of this controversy, are the victims of Jones' agitation. Noah and Veronique Pozner, who lost a son at Sandy Hook wrote:

    "In order to protect ourselves and our surviving children, we have had to relocate numerous times. These groups use social media, including Facebook, to “hunt” us, posting our home address and videos of our house online. We are currently living in hiding. We are far from alone in our experiences, as many other families who have lost loved ones in mass shootings and other tragedies have reported the same  continuing torment."

      The Pozners are American Nationals, and deserve the protection of the law from this sort of abuse. So is Gene Rosen, a hero who saved six children at Sandy Hook and has suffered vicious harassment since 2012. He is now 75 years old.

     Robert Parker, who lost a daughter at Sandy Hook has been accused of being a 'crisis actor' and was attacked across the Internet after a CNN interview. The McDonnell Family, who also lost a daughter had the memorial they had raised for her stolen and vandalized. The thieves actually called them to taunt them over the 'hoax'. In 2016, the sister of slain Sandy Hook teacher Victoria Soto was assaulted in New York City by a man demanding that she confess that her sister never existed. 

       Last year, the Catholic Church near Sandy Hook had to request police to patrol the Church grounds during a memorial prayer vigil. This was because of threats against the Church. And so on. To the best of our knowledge, Jones has never denounced nor criticized any of these activities in any way. 

      These are neither the words nor the actions of any real Conservative. Jones---like Andrew Anglin before him---is simply playing the victim card. Though not reported by the Corporate Media, a number of Republican politicians have stood by the Sandy Hook victims. So should we.

       

     



        

THE DOWNFALL OF ALEX JONES

      Infowars, the media empire built around the colorful Alex Jones collapsed and collapsed hard today. Apple, Facebook, Youtube, and Sportify more or less simultaneously wiped Jones & Company from their respective services. Twitter is under a lot of pressure to follow suit. Jones has been in trouble for some time; in March over half of his Youtube advertisers quit on him. 

       I first heard of Alex Jones when he was interviewed by the late Art Bell sometime back in the 1990's. Jones was telling a story of infiltrating Bohemian Grove. Based on what I remember of Skull and Bones fraternities from college, the story sounded plausible. And it was an exciting story: immodestly, I'll admit, sneaking into Bohemian Grove sounded like something I would liked to have done. 

      Afterwards, I read Infowars fairly regularly. Jones was always impressive in the actual research he did. He cited publicly verifiable sources and questioned things that the Clinton and Bush gangs were doing. But things began to change as Jones' popularity soared. His stories became more and more improbable and based less and less in actual fact. I think I quit listening to him a decade or so ago. His stories were not only becoming dubious; he was picking up some very shady advertisers as well. 

      Jones really last crossed our radar screens here with his absurd claims about the Sandy Hook School Massacre. According to Jones, the shooting was a false flag; ostensibly to push for gun control and a police state. Neither of those things actually happened because of Sandy Hook, but Jones has made it his cause celebre. Probably more than anybody else, Jones has been pushing the Sandy Hook Hoax Theory, resulting in a pending lawsuit. 

       Jones and his wife divorced in 2015, and comments from his own attorney hasn't helped his credibility in the least:

    "At a recent pretrial hearing, attorney Randall Wilhite told state District Judge Orlinda Naranjo that using his client Alex Jones’ on-air Infowars persona to evaluate Alex Jones as a father would be like judging Jack Nicholson in a custody dispute based on his performance as the Joker in “Batman.”

“He’s playing a character,” Wilhite said of Jones. “He is a performance artist.”

      Jones' ex-wife disputes this, claiming that Jones is a violent maniac. Either way, it's difficult to take him seriously. Fanatic or fraud, Jones lost his focus a long time ago. It's sad in a way, because Jones' career really had a promising start. But fame and fortune went to his head. It's rather reminiscent of what St. Paul said to his disciple, St. Timothy about the love of money being the root of many evils. 

       Despite what the tech companies say, Jones' multiple bans likely were related to the legal liabilities that he was incurring. A 1989 US Supreme Court Case ruled:

    "This case refined the actual malice standard. Daniel Connaughton, a candidate for an Ohio judgeship had some members of his office investigated by a grand jury. One of the witnesses testifying in the case offered a quote to the Journal-News referring to "dirty tricks" that Connaughton allegedly practiced. He sued the newspaper and won. The Supreme Court determined that the newspaper did not pursue the truth with due diligence. It's worth going over what the Supreme Court determined was "actual malice."

According to the Court:

1. The paper relied on a questionable source.

2. It did not seek out other, more reliable sources.

3. It ignored taped evidence to the contrary.

4. It ignored Connaughton's statements to the contrary.

5. It ignored the probability of questionable facts.

6. It published an editorial that seemed to indicate prejudice, as it contained opinions that were harbingers of conclusions reached in the news article.

7. The newspaper's management and its reporters gave differing accounts of assignments concerning the story."

   Jones is, by these standards, in for a real legal beating over his treatment of Sandy Hook; and Apple and the others likely didn't want to find themselves in the same boat as the Journal-News in the 1989 case. 

       Even before the US became independent, the 1734 Zenger Case established the precedent upon which our 1st Amendment is based: "The truth is an absolute defense against libel charges." It's always better to go with the truth, no matter how lucrative falsehood might be.