THE COMING GUN-GRAB

       So, with some RINO support, the Whacko Left Wing in the Rump Congress has passed a couple of new gun-control bills. There have been a couple of mass-shootings this week, too. Some think these are 'false flags' to help promote the passage of these kinds of laws. Actually, what really happens is that the Corporate Media chooses to give coverage to certain incidents when anti-gun legislation comes up. In some U.S. cities, mass-shootings happen fairly frequently, but the Media ignores them to talk about sex 'scandals', fanning Scam-demic hysteria, etc. As bad as these things are, no U.S. cities even rank in the Top Ten 10 worldwide for gun-related deaths, according to the United Nations' own numbers. But Ameroboobs today aren't especially interested in facts. It's all about getting outraged and taking action for the sake of taking action; that's how most 'public policy' is conducted anymore. 

     The nominal American Head of State even jumped on the bandwagon today, demanding that the Senate pass the House Bills. It will likely happen with or without Biden's screeching. The actual rulers of the United States favor it. The new Bills put some further restrictions on firearms purchases (by the general public)---and like most of the legislation preceding it---is aimed at eventually banning private firearm ownership. None of it will stop any of the global arms-trafficking that the Elites engage in, however. 

     Now, my own opinions on gun control laws are well-known. I am categorically opposed to them. The way to stop gun violence in America is to stop proliferating drugs, take known nutcases off the streets, and execute swift and sure justice for those who commit aggression with firearms or other weapons. That is all the 'gun control' we need: that is, controlling the whackos who abuse their freedoms.

     Of course, what our country should do and what it will do are two entirely different things. Most likely, we're closer to outright gun confiscation than most of us realize. The pro-2nd Amendment groups and politicians vow that it will never happen. But the reality is that there is absolutely no popular will to prevent it. If the events of the past 12-15 months have taught us anything, it's that the majority of Americans---the American Right included---are a collection of losers, cowards, and fools. We are literally living in the weakest, most morally bankrupt, and most ignorant generation that America has ever produced. 

     Nonetheless there's a chorus from the American Right to the effect that taking our guns will touch off a second Civil War or next American Revolution, or something.

     Well, the Government also has no right to restrict gun sales through the mail, or to require background checks or registrations, or to prohibit manufacturing or modifying guns, or to limit magazine capacity a gun-owner can have, or to establish gun-free zones, or to prohibit private sales/transfers of guns---nobody resisted any of these things, and now they are 'laws.' If there's one thing for certain these days: it's that the Left hasn't the least fear of any 'lines in the sand' that Conservatives boast about having. And there's no reason why they should. 

    In 2020 alone, the Left assumed dictatorial powers in several states and forcibly shut down thousands of legal businesses. They opened jails and turned violent thugs loose on cities while disbanding police forces and prosecuting anyone who acted in self-defense. They mandated a national dress code, forcing us to cover our faces like Islamic women have to do. They orchestrated the greatest wealth-transfer in human history. They blatantly stole a national election, along with a myriad of state and local races. In fact, over the last 30 years or so, they've run over the Right with zero resistance. If they want to take our guns, who's going to stop them? 

    It's not like 2020 was unprecedented either. The Left---with plenty of RINO complicity---purged our schools and universities; imposed Political Correctness and Cancel culture; outsourced our jobs to China; practically nullified any Privacy Rights we once had (along with most Property Rights); shoved homo 'equality' down our throats; and the Conservatives have done exactly what about it? Does anybody seriously believe that the 2nd Amendment is going to stop the Elites from violating it at will? They disregard every other part of the Bill of Rights with impunity. 

   Everything just mentioned in the preceding three paragraphs could have been stopped if Conservatives pressured local leaders not to enforce them. And some of us did try to warn people, but Conservative response was predictable...

     It's not going to be any different when the gun-grab ultimately comes. So it's obvious that stocking up on guns and ammo is not going to help much unless you have a very low profile. A better option would be to read up on gunsmith skills and stock up on tools like reloading equipment and accessories. Network with others who have the same abilities. That way, we can keep the Gun Culture alive even if the Elites go as far as confiscation (which they fully intend to do). 

    Above all, don't delude yourself into thinking that it can't happen here. It can, and it likely will. Get to know people of like minds, and keep a close eye on the attitudes of local authorities (i.e., their willingness to look the other way). Make common sense preparations. Like it or not, we're in a position where we are being driven further and further underground and that is not liable to change any time soon. 

    

    

     

THE LEFT'S GREAT GOD DIVIDE

      There was a story that went viral this week about a Republican Congressman who stood up and read a passage from the Bible. Whacko Left-Wing Congressman Jerrold Nadler---a 15-term incumbent and totally on the hook to law firms and Big Media--- lost it and screamed, "what any religious tradition describes as God’s will is no concern of this Congress!” 

    Nadler represents a heavily Jewish District in New York; and the potential unintended consequences of bashing the Jews while he really was venting on Christians sent Corporate Media so-called 'fact-checkers' scrambling. In fairness, Nadler probably has no more respect for the Jewish faith than he has for the Christian one; and actually I somewhat agree with him. Our Congress hasn't cared much about God's Will for a long time; and really is about the last place anybody should look for moral and upstanding citizens. 

    The Corporate Media itself has been on anti-religious streak (moreso than usual) lately. What occasioned this latest round of Leftist outrage was because Pope Francis refused once again to cave into political/financial pressure and bless homo 'marriage' as legitimate. "God cannot bless sin," the Pope said. 

    If there's one thing Liberals can't stand, it's being told 'no'---even if God says it. The ridiculous NPC-baiting show The View, invited CNN's Don Lemon to respond to the Pope. Why anybody thinks that Lemon would know anything about Biblical Ethics is beyond me; but we are talking about an audience that typically believes that anyone who gets on television is an expert. 

  "If you believe something that hurts another person, or does not give someone the same rights or freedoms... I think that this is wrong, and I think that the Catholic Church and many other churches really need to re-examine themselves and their teachings. Because that is not what God is about. God is not about hindering people or even judging people."

  There is some Liberal hubris at its finest. This little homo nobody is telling the Pope and the whole Christian leadership "what God is really all about," and how they "need to re-examine themselves" (i.e. repent). What's especially hypocritical is that these are the same yahoos who are always lecturing us little people on how we should trust the experts. Doubt the Scam-demic or the Climate Change Hoax and these types are the first in everyone's faces screaming that all of the experts say so! 

  So what exactly is Don Lemon's theological expertise? Pope Francis holds five doctoral degrees on the subject. I would think that that would qualify Francis as an expert on religion: but not these intellectually superior beings at CNN. In fact, even Lemon's qualifications as a journalist are fairly thin. Even the Columbia Journalism Review thinks he's a fool. Lemon nearly flunked out of Louisiana State and transferred to the more 'woke' Brooklyn College. He had a mediocre career in broadcasting until CNN decided they needed a homo Black man for virtue-signalling purposes. Now 55 years old, Lemon lives with his boyfriend in apartment. That's what the Corporate Media thinks should be giving the Church instructions on how to behave.

   "If you believe something that hurts another person or does not give someone the same rights and freedoms as others, I believe this wrong." Aside from the fact that Liberals never actually practice this themselves; the statement is just foolish. Literally taken, this would infer that Evil does not exist. Lemon reinforces that idea by saying that "God is not about hindering people or even judging people."

  "I think that religion and the pew are barriers that keep people from getting to know each other." Lemon continued, "So I would say to the Pope and the Vatican to go out and meet people, try and understand people; and do what the Bible and Jesus actually teaches which is to love your fellow-man and to judge not lest ye be judged." 

   Very well; so if Lemon is accusing the Church of bigotry isn't he passing judgment? So far, he hasn't set up any moral criterion by which the Church is wrong, other than quoting one Biblical passage out of context. If God is against judging people, how is Lemon justified in judging the Church? By the same token, if the Church does judge people unfairly, by Lemon's logic, God doesn't care anyway. 

   What Lemon and other Liberals fail to understand is that the Church doesn't 'judge' anybody---in the sense which Lemon means it: the Church follows Christ's command to lead the world to repentance and salvation. This isn't accomplished by simply accepting everybody's behavior with no regard to morality; it's done by educating others to live lives pleasing to God. The Catechism explains as follows: 

    "Conscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject authoritative teachings...Ministries should be exercised in a spirit of fraternal service and dedication to the Church, in the name of the Lord. At the same time the conscience of each person should avoid confining itself to individualistic considerations in its moral judgments of the person's own acts. As far as possible conscience should take account of the good of all, as expressed in the moral law, natural and revealed, and consequently in the law of the Church and in the authoritative teaching of the Magisterium on moral questions. Personal conscience and reason should not be set in opposition to the moral law or the Magisterium of the Church."

    In other words, moral teachings are for the good of all; and the selfishness and stubbornness of those who oppose them don't invalidate them. We are further informed that: 

   "A morally good act requires the goodness of the object, of the end, and of the circumstances together. An evil end corrupts the action, even if the object is good in itself (such as praying and fasting "in order to be seen by men"). The object of the choice can by itself vitiate an act in its entirety. There are some concrete acts - such as fornication - that it is always wrong to choose, because choosing them entails a disorder of the will, that is, a moral evil. It is therefore an error to judge the morality of human acts by considering only the intention that inspires them or the circumstances (environment, social pressure, duress or emergency, etc.) which supply their context. There are acts which, in and of themselves, independently of circumstances and intentions, are always gravely illicit by reason of their object; such as blasphemy and perjury, murder and adultery. One may not do evil so that good may result from it."

    If Lemon had paid more attention to what the Church actually teaches; he'd have understood that religion doesn't stand as "a barrier keeping us from knowing each other," but as barrier between Civilization and what would destroy it. As typical of most Liberals, Lemon is the real bigot, not the Pope. His whole argument is premised in the belief that Christians are motivated by hate and hypocrisy. Therefore, it's not unreasonable to him that Christians need merely change their attitudes and become more accepting. If he were more open-minded and accepting himself, he might see that what keeps him from God is his own selfishness and self-righteousness. 

    It's noteworthy that the Catechism, echoing the words of St. Paul, notes that: "If man commits evil, the just judgment of conscience can remain within him as the witness to the universal truth of the good, at the same time as the evil of his particular choice." Liberals like Lemon are notorious for displaying this behavior, though they never admit it. Why are they so obsessed with getting Christians to accept what they do, or their assent to their beliefs? If they don't believe in God, or care what He thinks, why don't they just go about their business and ignore us?

    The truth is that they cannot. They can't rest content because their instincts demand God's approval, but they want it on their own terms. Lemon and others like him are actually seeking validation and acceptance for their sinful behavior. It's not an act of Christian Love to give them that validation. "The verdict of the judgment of conscience remains a pledge of hope and mercy. In attesting to the fault committed, it calls to mind the forgiveness that must be asked, the good that must still be practiced, and the virtue that must be constantly cultivated with the grace of God." So far from Lemon's assertion that God doesn't judge us; He has given us a natural mechanism by which we judge ourselves. Validating or accepting their behavior hinders their ability to change for the better. 

   Our culture spiritually cripples people in the same way. In the not-too-distant past, Lemon would have been little more than the 'office fag'; shunned by everybody and probably not given any positions of great responsibility. He could have gotten psychological help for his sexual disorder and gone on to be a productive member of society. But instead, he's elevated to a position where he's not only out of his depth professionally; but actually put there precisely because of his sexual dysfunction. Undeserved wealth and power: that is one mechanism by which Satan enslaves people to sin. In our culture today, coming out as openly gay removes many barriers to power, fame, and fortune; while more competent and moral people are shoved aside. 

     That's the real 'barrier' in our culture today: between Good and Evil. What the Left desires is Evil under the facade of 'unity'. The Right needs to face this fact like Pope Francis did, and stop trying to pretend that Evil doesn't exist. 

     

SEXUAL HYSTERIA AND ANGLOSPHERE POLITICS

      So there has been another social firestorm erupting in both America and Australia recently. No, it isn't because of tyrannical acts perpetrated under the Scam-demic; or on account of the millions of people ruined, displaced, or killed during the past year. It isn't even because of the blatant trampling of human rights perpetrated under now year-long temporary emergency powers. The Anglosphere long ago collectively gave up any concern for the Rights of Man or empathy for one's neighbor. Instead, it's Sexual Misconduct Season!

     New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and Australian Attorney-General Christian Porter have been a pair of the most atrocious despots of our recent Color Revolution in the West. With all of that power came inflated egos. Both of these characters got big heads and thought that they could challenge the people who gave them that power. In December, Cuomo signed off on leading an anti-trust lawsuit against Facebook; while in September, Porter backed a law prohibiting Big Tech from manipulating news stories. The law actually passed; requiring Zuckerberg and Schmidt to get a bailout from fellow-Oligarch Rupert Murdoch. Now it's payback time. Right on cue, the allegations started coming out; new accusers come forward on a daily basis; and Angloboob outrage explodes. 

   Granted, I do believe that both Cuomo and Porter should be put on trial and afterwards sent to a firing-squad. But that's for committing crimes like Treason, Conspiracy, Corruption, Murder, and Crimes Against Humanity---not because they allegedly acted like a couple of cads. 

     In our postmodern dystopia, however, being accused of Sexual Misconduct is the worst thing that anyone can be accused of. Nobody ever has defined what 'sexual misconduct' actually means; but these days, nobody wants to split hairs over things like that. We live in an era, after when burning churches and courthouses and setting up 'autonomous zones' are considered 'peaceful protests' while demonstrators who read from the Bible while eating pizza are accused of insurrection. The same society where photographs of boxes of fake ballots are considered baseless claims of voter fraud while a flu outbreak is believed to have amassed more casualties than our last five major wars combined though there is no proof that it has whatsoever.  The same society that votes for politicians who scream about exploitation while demanding that we turn absolute power over to Oligarchs who presumably alone can solve all of our problems.

    The degenerate Anglosphere has this same schizophrenic attitude towards sexuality. We are one of the most sexually repressive and sexually obsessed cultures simultaneously. A businessman can lose his job for flirting with a female secretary; he can also lose it for saying anything critical about public schools hosting Drag Queen Story Hour. Major media figures are destroyed for having love-trysts with their groupies; but pole-dancing at the Grammy Awards and producing obscene music videos is perfectly socially acceptable. We saw lives destroyed at Penn State and Duke University over some locker-room horseplay and frat-boy shenanigans; yet it would be a brave mayor who dared cancel an annual Pride Parade because it was inappropriate for children to see. And so on. 

    This cancer erupted on our society with the disgraceful Senate Confirmation Hearings on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991. That is where the term 'sexual harassment' was invented and became a New Normal.

   The Corporate Media soon learned that 'sex scandals' sell. In reality, they'd always known that; but before the Thomas Hearings the Media had to find scandals that actually were serious and had some basis in fact. After the Thomas Hearings, they learned that they could manufacture scandals and accuse people on rumor and hearsay. Thomas was eventually confirmed, but a few other uppity Negroes like O.J. Simpson, Mike Tyson, Kobe Bryant, and Bill Cosby weren't so fortunate. 

  When the Clinton Co-Presidency assumed office in 1992, Hillary Clinton and her Lesbian friends declared a "gender war" which the Angloboobs, as per usual, uncritically swallowed. Instead of standing up to this depravity, the Right---also as per usual---adopted the same policy. I well recall former Republican Senator Robert Packwood coming into conflict with then-GOP leader Bob Dole over some resolution in which Packwood broke ranks with the Republicans. Shortly thereafter, Packwood found himself in the same boat as Thomas had been and was forced to resign. That formed the dangerous precedent of men losing positions for these kinds of allegations. Ultimately this hysteria resulted with the failed Impeachment of President Clinton. Passing over Clinton's other crimes like ordering the mass-murder of the Branch Davidians, or egregious acts of corruption, or abuses of the War Powers Act, the Republicans tried Clinton for doing what thousands of American men routinely do: he had an extra-marital affair and lied about it when he got caught. Despite Clinton's acquittal, the witch-hunts have continued unabated down to the present day.

     How did we get to this level of irrationality? Well, we are talking about convincing people who already believe that wearing a cotton face-cloths actually stop viruses or think that driving cars causes bad weather. Deceiving Angloboobs and fanning them into outbreaks of mass-hysteria is really not an especially difficult task. 

    But that aside, there are two main reasons why sexual witch-hunting has become a New Normal. The first is that it is driven by Envy. Women are naturally attracted to powerful/popular men; and some men, in turn, take advantage of that situation. That arouses a lot of jealousy upon some of the less-gifted populace. It especially arouses the fury of homosexuals---and the U.S. Government and Media are full of them. Hillary Clinton is a great example of this kind of jealous fury. An obvious Lesbian, Hillary was enraged that her husband was a 'chick magnet' but desirable women ignored her sexually. (Don't ask me; I don't know what they see in him either, but Bill Clinton admittedly has an attraction factor most men would love to have). This jealous fury has led Hillary with an obsession to level the sexual playing-field through political means. 

    The second reason that witch-hunting has continued is because it has weaponized sexuality. It has become the perfect tool for anybody---from high-level Corporate Oligarchs down to the passive-aggressive sniveling little government bureaucrat---to destroy anybody they don't want in their way any longer. Why give up what works? 

    And there we have the reality behind postmodern sexual politics. Originating in a sleazy political circus; driven by psychosexual neurotics; promoted by the Media for ratings; and sustained by jealousy and opportunism---the English-speaking world should blush with shame every time stories like these come out. Fortunately for the witch-hunters, though, our society long ago lost any sense of self-respect. 

    It never used to be like this. Sexuality was always considered a personal and private matter: not something to be displayed and dragged into daylight for public voyeurism. The Church---contrary to popular contemporary belief---never even considered natural sexual attraction a sin.*(see note below) St. Thomas Aquinas wrote: "St. John of Damascus said that sin exists because persons turn themselves from nature to what is contrary to nature. And so we hold that sin is contrary to nature. But sexual desire is natural, for nature has taught every animal to desire. Therefore, sexual desire is not original sin." Of course, there are limits on how this desire should be acted upon, both by religion and civilization. Being a cad like Cuomo and Porter had consequences then too.

     

    Worst of all though is that this petty obsession with sexuality distracts from real, very serious, and less personal issues. For example, does anyone really believe that Jeffery Epstein ran his operation in the Virgin Islands strictly for entertainment purposes? Besides Bill Clinton himself, Epstein's frequent visitors included Ehud Barak, former head of the Mossad. Epstein was a huge investor in Israeli tech firms building domestic spying technology. One of his major fund investors was Les Wexner, another billionaire with ties to the Mossad. Wexner was a supporter of RINO Romney and left the GOP in 2018, to "distance himself from Trumpism." 

    With all the horror "OMG! Older men having sex with younger women! And some were legal minors! Outrage! Horror!" no one notices that Epstein was a huge supporter of the Great Reset/NWO policies. Not only did he meet with WEF leader Prince Charles' brother, Andrew: he had deep ties to our current financial Oligarchs, like Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Reid Hoffmann, Eric Schmidt, George Soros, and more, including WEF scum from the Arab Royalty. 

      Epstein, like his friend Gates, was deeply committed to eugenics, and founded Harvard University's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics. Everybody focuses on the lurid details of Epstein's sexual practices while his real crimes (and those of his accomplices) go unnoticed. 

      The same is true now in both the Cuomo and Porter cases. The thousands killed in Cuomo's nursing-homes, the scores of thousands impoverished by the Scam-demic 'emergency orders', the people driven to depression and suicide, their corruption and subservience to financial oligarchs---just ignore that, we're told---and fly into uncontrolled rage because somebody acted like a cad. It's just none of our business. What they did elsewhere, that is what we should focus on. But until Anglospherians stop treating the world scene like one big Reality TV Show, the real criminals will keep getting away with their crimes while the underlings get sacrificed for absolutely nothing. 

*******************

    Note: some Manosphere Red Pills claim that Christianity is hostile to sexuality, and quote Christ's saying from the Sermon on the Mount that: "everyone who looks on a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart." It is obvious from the context---both in Greek and English---that Jesus is referring to lusting after another man's wife. How can one commit adultery, unless one or both parties are married? The passage they quote is in the middle of a paragraph concerning adultery and divorce.  

     

DISNEY: A SPECIMEN OF 'WOKE' SUBSERVIENCE

      So, it appears that the idiots running the Disney Corporation---people who believe that homosexual love-scenes are suitable viewing for children---have decided to ban several classic features on the pretext that they are somehow 'offensive.' Children under 7 years cannot access these programs on Disney Plus without parental consent: though the rest of the filth that Disney produces is fair game for the young ones. A warning comes up before the film stating that: "This program includes negative depictions and/or mistreatment of people or cultures. These stereotypes were wrong then and are wrong now. Rather than remove this content, we want to acknowledge its harmful impact, learn from it and spark conversation to create a more inclusive future together. Disney is committed to creating stories with inspirational and aspirational themes that reflect the rich diversity of the human experience around the globe."

    Once again, the hubris and arrogance of these Corporate Elites is displayed moreso than anything else. It's not enough for these jerks to produce and distribute children's material; they take it upon themselves to lecture us little people on its suitability for viewing. Maybe if Disney spent more time producing quality films, they wouldn't have to worry about our choices in viewing so much. The executives behind the Disney decision illustrates the sort of degenerates with which we're dealing. A high percentage of their Board are there for the purposes of 'enforcing diversity' and other such nonsense. Quite a few of them, too are focused upon investor relations, which is also noteworthy. 

   Like most of the rest of Big Media, Disney's wires are pulled by bigger interests. Behind their smug posturing, most media executives are---like our current political leadership---merely the slavish pawns and toadies of vested interests more powerful than themselves. The top 10 investors (i.e. owners) of Disney are: 

    Surprise, surprise! Vanguard, Blackrock, and State Street: the 'Big Three' index funds---and all cheerful supporters of the Great Reset---have about 1/5 of Disney's pie. Actually, if we go further down the list, George Soros' name turns up too.

   We've run into the scum at Vanguard before here; as well as the loathsome Great Reset crackpot Larry Fink of Blackrock. Fink, we might recall, openly bragged about the financial pressure that Blackrock laid upon companies to obey his Great Reset schemes. He's certainly not alone among this gang. Michael Tipsord of State Farm, for example, also serves on the Board of the Deep State Brookings Institution. Brookings' major funders, incidentally, are Bill Gates, George Soros, the never-Trump RINO Koch Brothers, PepsiCo, Ebay, and the Qatari Royal Family. Tipsord was an attendee at the Davos WEF Forum in 2020 which launched the Great Reset. In an interview with WGLT public radio, Tipsord said:

   "Particularly useful was the theme of the last World Economic Forum in Davos Swizerland; 'the fourth industrial revolution.' It's being sparked by the convergence of multiple technologies such as global hyper connectivity, three-d printing, machine learning AI, medical and wearable tech, the internet of things, and advanced sensor tech. And one of the things I took away from this one in particular was the cognitive computing capabilities that are coming and the displacement of work in a different way than what it has been in the past...the next set of macro trends: urbanization, the shared and sharing economy, changing demographics and notions of family, and renting versus owning, all complicate analysis."

    What would anyone suppose that Disney would produce under this kind of influence? Honorable leaders? Disney openly admits that it's fully behind the WEF's 2030 Agenda. In fact, Abigail Disney---heir to the Walt Disney fortune---is a WEF member, and the former head of Euro Disney was a WEF CEO. 

    As loyal stooges of the Global Elite, Disney also extends its masters' ideology into the political realm. According to OpenSecrets, Disney spends around $4.6 million on 32 Beltway lobbyists, 29 of whom are revolving-door former Federal bureaucrats. Incidentally, eight of our so-called 'Representatives' have over $100,000 in Disney stocks themselves. Notice who is far and away at the top of the list:

   Also, too, it's noteworthy that three of those eight folks are Republicans who don't let their Conservative values get in the way of their financial investments. I strongly suspect that Disney Plus' 100-million member subscription base and that their current $195/share stock-market price isn't all the handiwork of Liberal Democrats either. So I think it best that we take any more Conservative outrage over Disney's corrosive social policies with a large grain of salt. 

   Meanwhile, Disney will go on: shoving its 'woke agenda' on the children and acting as a propaganda arm for the WEF. And, as usual, Conservatives will stand idly by and let it all happen. 

   

CHURCHIANS FOR BIDEN GET HUMILIATED

      Blogger Pacific Pundit had a brief article up today  about a petition being circulated by a group of Churchians to the Junta protesting inclusion of abortion funding in the so-called Covid-19 Relief Bill. While I agree with taking that provision of the Bill (along with other handouts for the Elites), I had to do a double-take reading the premises behind the petition. It reads:

    "As pro-life leaders in the evangelical community, we publicly supported President Biden's candidacy with the understanding that there would be engagement us on the issue of abortion and particularly the Hyde Amendment. The Biden team wanted to talk to us during the campaign to gain our support, and we gave it on the condition there would be active dialogue and common ground solutions on the issue of abortion. There has been no dialogue since the campaign.We feel used and betrayed and have no intention of simply watching these kinds of efforts happen from the sidelines. Many evangelicals and Catholics took risks to support Biden publicly. President Biden and Democrats need to honor their courage."

   I thought at first that this had to be fake news, but no; it's for real. Granted, the Republican Party has a pathetic record of selling out to the Abortion Industry too; but when did the Democrats ever take a pro-life stand? There used to be some pro-life Democrats---I don't know if there are any left---but seriously: "As Evangelicals, we publicly supported Biden's candidacy?" These were people who were in the streets breaking down statues of Jesus and burning churches; and these yahoos actually thought that the Junta would work with Christians?

   

    This group calls itself Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden and was launched in September, 2020. "Thousands of leading Pro-Life Evangelicals—including the former chair of Christianity Today, Billy Graham’s granddaughter, numerous evangelical college presidents, and mega church pastors—released a statement in September announcing the launch of Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden," says the group's website. "These pastors cited four key principles for pro-life voters to prayerfully consider:

1. 1.Biden will do more to actually reduce abortions than Trump,

2. 2.Overturning Roe will have little impact on abortions,

3. 3.Pro-life Christians must consider their responsibility to protect life after birth as well before, and

4. 4.Trump poses a deep threat to the Christian witness."

Orange Man Bad, they may as well have said. Points 2 and 4 are false; Point 3 is true, but not relevant to the issue; and point 1 is sophistry.

On their website, they make the rather dubious claim that the number of abortions have declined under Democrats while increasing under Republicans. They attribute this to the Democrats' poverty programs, which they assume encourages poor families to have children. This is the premise behind their first point.

I would suggest that (assuming their claims are actually true) since most women who get abortions are politically Liberal, the numbers go up under Republican Administrations because they feel less hopeful about the future. All that we need recall is the hysterical behavior of Liberal women during the Trump Administration and ask if that isn't a real possibility. I would wager that the number of prescription antidepressants went up among them too.

But the whole idea of reducing abortions is stupid. It's the same logic behind these Churchian adoption agencies who recently sold out to the Gay Mafia. Pro-Life and Anti-Life do not peacefully coexist. Either one supports outlawing the murder of children, or one doesn't. One either opposes homo adoption or one doesn't. Having hundreds of children murdered in the womb each year wouldn't make us a better country than murdering thousands, as we do now. The political leadership is no less guilty for funding one baby-killing than it is for funding a million of them. The attitudes that these Evangelicals take is being an NPC at its worst.

It's sad to think that Evangelicals once were moved by stories of child-sacrifice to go as missionaries to countries populated by savages with hopes of ending these hideous practices. Now they've evolved to kneeling in front of street-savages and supporting human sacrifice.

Their second point about overturning Roe vs. Wade is just a falsehood. True: Conservatives haven't done much to stop abortion and instead shove the responsibility onto the Court. Even Republican majorities on the U.S. Supreme Court have never bothered to revisit Roe. The Corporate interests who currently actually govern the United States have encouraged abortion through the Insurance Cartels, while even the U.N. and AMA admit that infertility has become an epidemic in the U.S. and is being ignored by these same insurance interests. Roe v. Wade is not irrelevant: it is currently the law of the land and opens taxpayer funding for these abominable enterprises.

Their charge that Trump was a threat to Christianity is just ridiculous. Trump has spoken at churches; he repealed federal support for atheist and satanist groups who want to have Christian displays removed. He's also the only president since Gerald Ford who actually fought to end federal abortion funding, and actually succeeded in stripping some abortion mills of funds. Trump ended the federal policy of siding with homo activists who targeted small businesses and even issued presidential pardons for some jailed for Right of Conscience. Trump used his influence to pressure the Turkish Government to end their persecution of Christians; and offered to give asylum to a British family whose baby was ordered taken off life-support by a cruel judge, Does anybody suppose that the Junta will do any of this?

No: the Junta is going to reverse all of these policies because dolts like these 'Evangelicals for Biden' only saw Orange Man Bad for four years, and helped elevate to power the most anti-Christian Regime that America has ever produced.

The compromising, toadying, do-nothing Right has once again sold us out. Now they're complaining that the Junta doesn't respect them. What did they expect? The Junta represents a body of men who want to wipe out traditional religion and replace it with themselves as earthly gods. Now that they've seized control of the United States, the Churches should be the very ones opposing them. But, they're showing us all what their true colors really are.

Christians can disagree on policy issues. It is not debatable when the State is moving towards an anti-Christian dictatorship and prescribes radically anti-Christian policies. 'Evangelicals for Biden' are a pack of ignorant poltroons and represent everything wrong with today's postmodern Churchianity.

WEF PIRATES CALL FOR CONTROL OF THE SEAS

      So, it seems that the Junta's emissaries to China met with a rather embarrassing reception in Beijing last week. Given the sexual orientation of many of the Junta's members, we're not sure at this point how many of them went back for a second test. Ah---the whole incident brings back memories of the Obama days.

   On the subject of swabs, the pirates at the World Economic Forum are at it again. Not satisfied with seizing the United States, Klaus Schwab and his merry-men have set their larcenous sights upon stealing the world's oceans. At Davos recently, they've decided upon a new plan to bring this about. Some academic pinhead associated with the University of California at Santa Barbara and a stooge of Tech/Media Oligarch Marc Benioff,  has given the world a 10-point program. 

1. Freeze the warming. Stopping climate change is the hardest but most important step we can take for ocean health. It is good news to have the US back in the Paris Agreement.

2. Walk the talk. We need to make these carbon neutrality commitments real. This will require massive new investment in renewable energy sources, including some more experimental solutions (such as fusion), plus potentially looking with open minds into making older low-carbon energy solutions safer and more viable (such as traditional nuclear). We need to fast-track the development of sustainable low-emission batteries to store this energy intelligently across our grids. This includes major needs for marine energy infrastructure. A future, for example, with electrified ports and low-emission ships would help eliminate the epidemic of deafening ocean noise, address environmental injustices associated with pollution in ports, make oil spills a thing of the past, and significantly reduce oil spills.

3. Blue revolution. The 'green revolution' – a massive ramping up of food production on land in the 1950s – has belatedly reached the sea...The green revolution was sloppily executed, and the first baby steps of the blue revolution have included similar stumbles: chemical pollution, genetic pollution and habitat destruction. But the blue revolution can still clean up its act. Farming in the right places, with the right species, and the right practices could make aquaculture a win for environmental health.

4. 30 x 30. Parks protect some of our most important chunks of nature on land – our Yellowstones and Serengetis. We are vastly behind setting up parks in the sea. We need to follow through on calls to protect 30% of our oceans by 2030.

5. The other 70%. An ocean industrial revolution is beginning. Human industry is growing at exponential rates in the sea. Even if we succeed in protecting 30% of the ocean, we must still intelligently zone and manage this accelerated anthropogenic growth in the majority of our unprotected ocean. 

6. Big cracks in the sea. Most of the ocean belongs to us all. This includes the two-thirds of the ocean in the high seas that lies beyond all nations’ ocean borders and the marine regions surrounding Antarctica. Protection of biodiversity and equitable sharing of resources has slipped through antiquated governance gaps in these international ocean spaces.

7. End plastic pollution. Plastic pollution is the ocean’s new cancer. We need to ban unnecessary plastics and tax other single use plastics, finally making them valuable materials we want to recover and helping to pay for the full cost of their environmental impacts. We need research and tech to prevent plastics from leaking into the sea, to overhaul our recycling systems, and to design economically viable alternatives to plastics.

8. Land. We can help the ocean by first setting a few things right on land...Precision agriculture that optimizes fertilizer use, coupled with other farming reform practices can help.

9. Wired ocean. We need more ocean data. This includes new tech to detect illegal fishing and connect sustainable fishers to consumers. We need tech to help endangered wildlife co-exist with ocean industry and fleets of environmental sensors above and below the water to better study our rapidly changing ocean.

10. Ocean equity. To build a healthy ocean, we must ensure all people have a fair stake in its success and that they are no longer unevenly harmed by ocean health risks. The fate of the ocean will affect people in all communities. Thus, we need people from all communities in ocean science, management, and policy.

     It needs to be stressed, of course, that nobody elected this dork or his bosses, Schwab and Benioff, to do anything. The arrogance and hubris of these WEF slime is truly amazing. He admits in #9 that the oceans need further research to understand how they operate---and spends nine more paragraphs telling us how experts like himself should be dictators over the seas and how they're used.

    The WEF Oligarchs have been asserting---with no proof whatsoever---that "unless we act now, the oceans could become extinct in x-number of years!" They are especially obsessed with plastic waste, which they imagine will destroy all marine life. All of their predictions of imminent ecological disaster have been proven hoaxes for the last 50 years, but this doesn't stop anybody from falling for the new ones. 

     All of these proposals---just coincidentally we're sure---would redound to great profit for agribusiness and shipping monopolies. Especially the part about blockading 30% of the entire waterways and heavily regulating the other 70%. It should be obvious even to NPC's who believe all of this 'green' nonsense that only the big port controllers and fisheries will be allowed to operate within these zones. Not to mention the smuggling and human-trafficking operations these same Elites are widely believed to conduct on the side. 

     The author of these proposals is one Douglas McCauley, a professor of Marine Biology at UCSB. He was formerly a bureaucrat in Obama's National Fish and Wildlife Service. After only two years there---and barely longer out of graduating with a Ph.D---McCauley suddenly found himself a cause celebre in Academia, Inc.. Within just three years, between 2011-2014, he was on the lecture circuit at UC Berkeley, Stanford, and Princeton. In 2014, he landed a professorship at UCSB. Then, in 2016, Tech oligarch Marc Benioff dropped a fat payoff donation in McCauley's lap---which he subsequently used to establish the Benioff Ocean Initiative. 

    Aside from the obvious Conflict of Interest here, anyone familiar with the internal machinations of postmodern Academia has to arch their eyebrows a bit at McCauley's meteoric rise. It's not that unusual for a Ph.D to graduate and get a position with the U.S. Government. It is however a bit phenomenal to climb from there to heading a fully-funded department and getting 85 articles published; along with hobnobbing with high officials at the U.N. and WEF in less than 10 years---especially for a White male these days. Something about McCauley's rapid promotion (in spite of his obvious incompetence) smells fishy; and not just because we're near the ocean. 

   When we look at the Board of Directors of the Benioff Ocean Initiative, whose website somewhat revealingly reads ,"Tell us what’s broken in your ocean. Ideas welcome from anyone, anywhere.We get the best minds in marine biology to solve your problem.We put down a million dollars to make the solution real," we find scattered among the usual crop of academic parasites a few names with financial connections.

   One of these is Lynne Benioff, Marc's domestic partner.

        The Benioff Family has an estimated net worth of around $9 billion. They own Big Media fake-news outlet, Time Magazine, and the Big Tech conglomerate Salesforce. Marc Benioff himself is a fanatical devotee of Klaus Schwab and was a featured star at the WEF's infamous Great Reset Forum. He currently holds a position on the WEF's Board of Trustees. 

     Though born Jewish, the Benioffs claim their spiritual inspiration comes from crackpot Indian guru Mata Amritananamayi. Politically, the Benioffs are solidly with the Whacko Left. Benioff led attempted Big Tech boycotts of states opposing homo 'marriage', and gave millions to fund the anti-2nd Amendment March for Our Lives. According to Open Secrets, the Benioffs are major donors to the DNC. Salesforce spends about $2-3 annually on 22 Beltway lobbyists; 19 of whom are revolving-door former federal officials. 

     Robert Bradley is another name which turns up. 

      According to his online C.V., "Robert Bradley is currently retired. Prior to retirement, Mr. Bradley spent 30 years handling the tax, investment and financial matters for wealthy families." That should almost be enough to raise 'red flags' right there; however we read that, "Most recently, he was the Chief Executive Officer of Ekahi Aloha LLC, a single-family office headquartered in the San Francisco bay area. Prior to his work at Ekahi Aloha LLC, Mr. Bradley was the Chief Operating Officer for Skywalker Properties Ltd LLC, a commercial real estate company based in San Francisco...Mr. Bradley serves on the Advisory Boards for the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the Benioff Ocean Initiative." 

    Skywalker Properties manages the 3,000-acre Skywalker Ranch, owned by Hollywood big-shot George Lucas. The property is closed to the public, but according to Wikipedia, "The Ranch contains a barn with animals, vineyards, a garden with fruits and vegetables used in the on-site restaurant, an outdoor swimming pool and fitness center with racquetball courts, the man-made "Ewok Lake", a hilltop observatory, a 300-seat theater called "The Stag" as well as theater screening rooms, and parking that is mostly concealed underground to preserve the natural landscape. The Main House has a company research library under a stained-glass dome. Skywalker Ranch has its own fire station. Skywalker Ranch is intended to be more of a "filmmaker's retreat" than a headquarters for Lucas's business operations." An archetypical Left-Wing Hollywood whacko, Lucas also runs a philanthropic front called The George Lucas Educational Foundation, of which Robert Bradley is a Board Member. Lucas' actual corporate headquarters are at the Letterman Digital Arts Center, a 17-acre campus in San Francisco's Presidio District. Skywalker Properties manages that, too.

    Ekahi Aloha is a financial services company of which the Benioffs are a client. Marc Benioff is said to have an interest in all things Hawaiian, and even bought a five-acre estate there. In 2006, he began construction on a huge mansion on Hawaii's largest island. 

    Wait a second---wasn't Douglas McCauley, the head of the UCSB marine institute a federal official in Hawaii about that time? Isn't it a strange coincidence how all of these people keep turning up in the same places? 

    Though not directly represented on the Marine Institute's Board (that we know of), the once venerable and now disgustingly politically-correct Coca-Cola Company recently dropped another cool $11 million into McCauley's racket institute. 

   With this much Corporate Cash flowing in from Left-Wing donors with both financial and political incentives, does anyone seriously believe that McCauley is conducting unbiased and objective research? The Conflicts of Interest apparent here are so blatant that any attempt to turn over any regulation of the World's seas to this group must be opposed categorically. 

  Unfortunately, the United States has no leadership willing to stand up to the WEF crooks. We did, but it was Orange Man Bad among the Ameroboobs, and now we have a Junta utterly subservient to the WEF agenda. It's going to be up to other world leaders to protect the sovereignty of the world's oceans from now on.