THE BIRTHRATE BOMB AND BUD LIGHT

    There was an interesting news story today from one of the Beltway's colonial outposts in East Asia. What passes for an actual government in South Korea today took some measures ostensibly to remedy that nation's desperately declining birthrates. South Korea's Ministry of Gender Equality and Family (if one can imagine a government agency with a name like that capable of doing anything positive for society) announced that it would begin providing a subsidy for 'reclusive youths aged 19-24' to reintegrate them into society. 

    The new policy will give people in this age group $500 per month, which supposedly will be spent on socializing. We'll see about that, but personally I'm a little skeptical.

    South Korea's birthrate is currently at 0.75 children per family: which is at the very bottom of the world. At this rate, the population of South Korea will drop 50% by the 22nd Century, while four times as many workers will be needed to support the aging population. 

   Academia Incorporated has come up with several---mostly bogus---explanations for the crisis in which South Korea currently finds itself. The reality is that very few countries have absorbed the degenerate cultural ethos of the Left to the degree with South Korea has. We've given them all of the blessings of American Exceptionalism. Things like:

   1. Widespread corruption throughout the upper levels of government and society which saps initiative and innovation;

  2. Vast wealth inequality that makes raising a family too expensive;

  3. Cutthroat competition and egoism that pushes relationships aside;

  4. Meaningless distraction throughout their media;

  5. Radical Feminism which has depreciated men and raised the average age of marriage to 29 for most women.

  6. Growing acceptance of the homo agenda and legalized abortion. 

  7. Declining fertility rates via regulatory capture of health agencies---

    This list could go on. The effects of our Cultural Imperialism are taking a toll over there. South Korea currently has even higher suicide rates than we have; a drug problem that has escalated in spite of severe laws; and among the highest rates of mental illness in Asia including depression and alcoholism. Obviously, this isn't going to be fixed with a $500 handout. 

   As further proof that the culture is the problem, consider that the (many) South Koreans who expatriate to other countries tend to be among the best of immigrant communities. Statistics among Asian immigrants in the US, for example, show that Koreans have low crime rates, are among the most economically productive, and have strong family structures with lower rates of divorce, abortion, and other problems that characterize the native-born here. Another interesting comparison is against the demographics of North Korea---which the jackals in the US Media portray as one of the grimmest societies on Earth.

  North Korea has a birthrate of 2.0 which, while not outstanding, is still sustainable and about twice what the non-immigrant birthrate in the US is. Divorce and abortion are both legal in North Korea, but apparently quite uncommon. For obvious reasons, getting a reliable assessment of how satisfied the population is with their quality of life there is impossible; but on the surface at least, they seem to be doing a bit better than the South. 

  While there is no actual law against homosexuality in North Korea, the perversion is not encouraged, and certainly not celebrated. The North Koreans, in fact, seem to place a high value on traditional families. Today there was a headline in their official news outlet announcing that this year's first triplets were born to a farm worker (who is apparently now something of a local hero) and his wife.

    Contrast that with the American Media's headlines which currently include:

1. Ganging up on a Liberal Feminist who finds the terms birthing parent and person with a uterus degrading to women. 

2. Chimping out over a Manosphere 'influencer' who defends substituting trans-men for real women.

3. Listening to the Controlled Opposition explain why Bruce Jenner is a genuine social role model while Dylan Mulvaney is not.

4. Listening to the Controlled Opposition trying to pretend that a $5 billion loss for a corporation valued at $300 billion is some great victory in the culture war.

Et cetera, et cetera...

     It's also noteworthy that here in Exceptional America we're holding serious national debates over whether children should be gender-reassigned and whether drag performers should lead children's story-hours. Meanwhile, in the country that Rationalwiki describes as: "the most undemocratic and totalitarian state in existence, even worse than Saudi Arabia and only contested by ISIS at its peak...with possibly the world's worst human rights record," says this about the triplets' birth:

   "Immediately after being confirmed as a pregnant woman with triplets, the mother was admitted to the Pyongyang Maternity Center and received medical assistance from medical staff while receiving various nutritious foods and supplements. Thanks to the efforts of doctors and nurses here, the mother delivered her triplets (all sons) smoothly...The medical group warmly welcomed the triplets and their parents as they left the Pyongyang maternity center in good health, receiving gifts of kindness, including gold rings." 

   Earlier this year, we noted that another of South Korea's neighbors, China, had experienced a population decline. Instead of subsidizing Incels, the Chinese Government started off with an interesting project. 

    "A number of vocational colleges in China are offering students an extended Spring Break while encouraging them to experience nature and pursue love — a move that has been interpreted by some on Chinese social media as a bid to boost the country’s falling birth rate...

  "Nine colleges affiliated with the Fan Mei Education Group announced this year’s extended break from April 1 to 7, with the theme of enjoying flowers and falling in love, in a March 23rd press release."

  Meanwhile, here in the Prozac Nation, our schools and universities employ rigid speech codes and other forms of persecution against anyone showing interest in the opposite sex; while fanatically pushing a pro-homo agenda. Once again, Postmodern Neoliberal democracies are made to look like complete fools and utter failures by Communist regimes. We've come to the point where our own Radical Feminists and foreign Marxists make more sense than contemporary ideology on so-called 'gender identity.' 

  In the typical Manichean black-white either-or way that Americans approach any issue, I certainly don't want to come across as pro-Communist or pro-Feminist; but at certain point one has to admit that they are at least making an effort to deal with problems. When we've reached a point when Anna Kasparian is defending the dignity of women with more determination than all of the milquetoast Right combined; and North Korean and Chinese Commissars are coming up with better social policy than the democratic West---at this point it's time to admit that we have gone radically off-course. 

 There's nothing positive about authoritarian Party rule or gender politics---but that's the whole point. We can't even sink to the level of Marxist Feminists and do it right. Ask yourselves which political faction in the US even addresses---let alone actually having a plan for--- the demographic vise that we've put our young people into. The Whacko Left Wing thinks that lower birth rates, more abortions, fewer traditional families, and more gender dysphoria are good things. The Knee-Jerk Right wants to expel immigrants and have everyone working 80 hours a week for a bare minimum of housing and food---that somehow is supposed to increase the population. 

 All of these attempts from the contemporary Right to paint the Chinese and North Koreans as enemies of America and scapegoating immigrants are just a form of whitewashing the truth. These Communist States aren't getting better, we however, are getting worse; and our problems are entirely of our own making. We surrendered our schools and media to the Radical Left; we surrendered our economic base to globalists, we surrendered our families to 'the village' and now we're reaping what we've sown.

GO WOKE GO BROKE?

      So, just as we predicted less than three weeks ago, Drew Barrymore's promotion of troon 'influencer' Dylan Mulvaney was intended to begin the kick-off of a concerted Corporate Media campaign to promote the Trans Agenda. Wall Street combines Nike and Anheuser-Busch so far have risen to the call; the former ridiculously retaining Mulvaney to market athletic bras and the latter to sell the Bud Light brand---the unofficial national drink of American rednecks. 

     Considering that these corporations have already alienated most of their consumer base: Nike by pushing the trans agenda into women's sports, and Budweiser's repeated showing its contempt for the good-old-boy culture which mainly consumes it---we have to come to the conclusion that "market forces" have nothing whatsoever to do with these decisions. Conservatives like to fantasize about "go woke, go broke" as if any of these looters had the slightest concern for the feelings of their consumers. 

    The blog Pinon Post had an article yesterday about the brands to boycott which are connected with Bud Light. I don't know which is more troubling: the fact that Bud Light uses Mulvaney as a spokes-xhe or the fact that Anheuser-Busch has its thumb on about 2/3 of the brands of beer one encounters in a store. There is where the real problem lies. 

    

      If one asks a typical American, they will tell you that Budweiser is a true-blue American brand made right here in St. Louis. Well, there are still factories there. However, Anheuser-Busch was bought out in 2010 by EU Agribusiness conglomerate InBev. Now a member in good standing of the World Economic Forum, Anheuser-Busch today is headquartered in Belgium. CEO Michel Doukeris---a Brazilian national---is a WEF Agenda Contributor. Anheuser-Busch's ESG Director Ezgi Barcenas spoke at the 2022 Forum and had this to say about COP27:

   "I would love to see more urgency, but also that impatient optimism. What we really need to see is a growing recognition of the steps that have been taken so far and the solutions that have been identified and finding ways to scale those up, finding ways to finance to some of those solutions. But at the same time, also, openly talking about the gaps that we have around policies, enabling environments, the regulatory backbones that are needed in so many countries where we can continue to drive this agenda with our with our partners across the value chain." 

   This after explaining how Anheuser-Busch is expanding into Third World countries with 'innovative technologies' which essentially enslave local economies to the Corporation: "That is a blockchain-enabled technology platform that operates basically over SMS. So, you don't need a smartphone, you just need a cell phone. It increases the traceability and transparency of our value chain. So now, for the first time in certain markets, we actually know where our barley comes. And that farmer also has visibility around the amount of barley they sold to us, at what price they sold it to us.They're being enabled and empowered with a digital financial identity, because now they have sales records that they worked for a global company like ABInBev, and they now exist in our supply chain. Whereas beforehand, that visibility did not exist. It did not make them bankable."

    Two-thirds of Anheuser-Busch's stock is owned by American Agribusiness Cartel, the Altria Group. The Altria Group has massive holdings in beer, tobacco, and legal marijuana. WEF Top 100 Strategic Partner, Blackrock, holds about 10% of Altria's shares. 

    

   Does anyone still want to pretend that this is a 'free market?' Sure, profits may still matter a little. But let's be honest here: these institutions are too big to fail. When one organization controls 90% of the money, they feed it through the system in a loop, so they never actually lose anything if pushing an agenda doesn't pan out. But usually it does, because neither consumers nor producers have any realistic alternative. 

   If anyone believes that we'll see any pushback from Washington over any of this, consider that Anheuser-Busch (a foreign corporation no less) retains 50 Beltway lobbyists, 38 of whom are revolving-door former federal bureaucrats. Their bosses in the Altira Group have 73 lobbyists, of whom 65 are revolvers, including former Republican Congressman, Kevin Yoder. GOP PACs also took in the bulk of Altira donations while Anheuser-Busch---which has its own PAC---gives about equally to candidates in both parties. Anheuser-Busch is also a significant government contractor with the EPA's so-called 'Green Energy' schemes. In the EU, they and fellow-WEF member Microsoft have been pushing so-called 'smart technology' to exercise even greater control over their near-monopoly on European beers. 

   As we've stated before, the LGBTQ agenda and the transhumanist agenda are deeply connected. Yuval Harari---one of the WEF gurus, and himself a flaming homosexual---said: "In the coming decades, AI and biotechnology will give us godlike abilities to reengineer life, and even to create completely new life-forms. After four billion years of organic life shaped by natural selection, we are about to enter a new era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design. Our intelligent design is going to be the new driving force of the evolution of life." 

  Naturally, these godlike powers can't be trusted to ordinary humans: 

  "Whenever a leader says something like 'My Country First!' we should remind that leader that no nation can prevent nuclear war or stop ecological collapse by itself, and no nation can regulate AI and bioengineering by itself. Almost every country will say: 'Hey, we don’t want to develop killer robots or to genetically engineer human babies. We are the good guys. But we can't trust our rivals not to do it. So we must do it first'. If we allow such an arms race to develop in fields like AI and bioengineering, it doesn’t really matter who wins the arms race – the loser will be humanity."

   Therefore, we need a godlike race of our betters, who'll know what's best for us:

   "Unfortunately, just when global cooperation is more needed than ever before, some of the most powerful leaders and countries in the world are now deliberately undermining global cooperation. Leaders like the US president (Trump) tell us that there is an inherent contradiction between nationalism and globalism, and that we should choose nationalism and reject globalism. But this is a dangerous mistake." 

   Of course, he objects to any notion that any of this would lead to a 'digital dictatorship' which, according to Harari, only could happen if nations and people insist on their sovereignty. The Elites naturally would never abuse their power although he predicts that

  "In the not-so-distant future, similar algorithms might tell us where to work and who to marry, and also decide whether to hire us for a job, whether to give us a loan, and whether the central bank should raise the interest rate."

   This is a glimpse into the mindset of the people responsible for promoting the likes of Dylan Mulvaney. Extreme megalomania combined with a hatred of Western Civilization that runs so deep that their fanatical obsession is focused wholly on destroying it and rebuilding. Harari is not even concerned with human cost, despite a few virtue-signalling sound-bites, he laconically admits that "in using our new divine powers of creation we might make mistakes," but goes on to warn us that only by trusting the Oligarchy with absolute power can we avoid such a fate. "We humans should get used to the idea that we are no longer mysterious souls," he opines, "We are now hackable animals. That's what we are." 

   Getting us used to that idea is precisely what's driving cultural phenomena like Mulvaney promoting Bud Light. This is not just some virtue-signalling management team trying to be edgy and politically correct. It's not even about a marketing angle or inflating that all-sacred bottom line. This is about a fanatical minority of the uber-wealthy who want to slice Civilization down to its own level and make us all forget incidental details of life like having mysterious souls. 

   Sadly, it seems that postmodern America is too far gone to resist any of this; which is why these Great Reset freaks decided to prioritize seizing the machinery of state here and the rest of the Anglosphere. The EU was probably the first choice, but too much popular resistance and Russia's unwillingness to bow to the Regime made that option untenable. The emasculated, dispirited, and effete culture of today's Anglosphere is much more fertile soil for such ideas to take root.

   

   

THE 'SETTLED SCIENCE' OF EASTER

   So another Easter in postmodern America has come and gone. The Junta made an Easter statement by issuing a Cease-and-Desist Order to bar Catholic clergy from ministering to the sick at military hospitals. Not to be outdone, Arch-RINO Ron DeSantis signed legislation criminalizing Christian organizations providing aid to immigrants. DeSantis already deploys the Florida National Guard in patrol boats to turn away refugees---many who've arrived in craft that were not seaworthy to begin with. This is happening in spite of the fact that Florida beaches are too polluted for human use and its fisheries are contaminated with narcotics; but owning the Libtards---that's the important thing. 

   Ameroboobs responded to this bipartisan holiday attack on Christians in a predictable manner.

      Naturally, too, the Atheist Left couldn't resist pouncing upon any article daring to comment upon the spiritual significance of Easter. It's like a mania with these people. They don't believe in God, yet they have a near OCD-level urge to argue with anybody who does. I recall a few years ago, Pope Benedict visited Turkey during Easter and a controversy arose over it. Some news anchor---I don't remember whom---reported the story with an incredulous sneer and then turned to a Bishop whom he was supposed to interview for commentary. The first question out of Smart Journalist's mouth was "Archbishop: This is the 21st Century! You mean that there are still people out there who take this whole Easter business seriously?" 

     Ahhh...the tolerant spirit of the Whacko Left Wing. Sometimes I really miss the older generation of Atheists who actually read the Bible and Theologies, and whom one really had to engage in serious debate. In the Postmodern Era, the intellectual effort that goes into promoting Atheism is less than impressive, to put it mildly.

     Blogger Colorstorm wrote an Easter reflection with an analogy between the Resurrection and Botany which drew down more Atheist commentary than the length of his entire article itself. It's truly amazing how once upon a time, Philosophers actually thought that Science would put an end to superstition and fanaticism and draw people closer to a rational knowledge of God. In fairness, they really couldn't foresee Scientism, since Scientism really hasn't any known historical parallels. This is one reason why Faith is important; because we don't always know how these innovations---even well-intended ones---will turn out.

    Atheism is a false theory. It's only really growing in our decaying society because the postmodern inquisitors in Academia, Incorporated have shut down any logical debate on the Existence of God. The superstitious nonsense of postmodern Scientism is based on monist materialism and moral relativism. According to contemporary doctrine, Mankind's existence is due to a purposeless, random combination of atoms and elements which (somehow) managed to produce a species vastly superior to all other species. Although all beliefs are socially programmed, the idea of the rational mind is an illusion. How illusions are created without the ability to reason independently, or how this programming supposedly took place in prehistoric times without societies to do it, they also haven't explained. Yet, they tell us that religious faith is no different than a belief in magic. This in spite of the fact that religions teach that Mankind has a purpose according to a divine plan, whereas Scientism that natural laws can be transformed simply by changing one's attitudes or perceptions towards them. 

     Science can't do any more than explain processes. It can't explain purposes or meaning behind any of them; so some more shallow thinkers presume that no such purposes or causes exist. What those who believe in Scientism (or Atheism in general) can't account for is:

     1. How a belief or concept of God came into being without any Evolutionary purpose for it;

     2. How humans came to conceive of God as a Perfect Good when there is no archetype in Nature from which they could have drawn such a conclusion;

     3. Why humans have always believed that we possess a nature inclined to Sin and that Righteousness is living in harmony with Divine Law when there is no logical reason to do so (i.e. in this life, good is not always rewarded and evil is not always punished; in fact on earth the opposite often happens);

    4. Why humans should have developed a conscience discerning Good and Evil when no such ability exists in any other species;

    5. How the concept of the Immortality of the Soul or the existence of life after death came into being when there is no empirical evidence of any such thing. 

    The only answer based in Reason is that "And the Lord God formed man of the slime of the earth: and breathed into his face the breath of life, and man became a living soul." That is, at some point in our prehistory, Mankind had a direct encounter with God, Who elevated him to a spiritual being, which in turn developed these beliefs into an instinct not possessed by other species. If the practitioners of Scientism and Atheism didn't have minds so hopelessly closed to even the possibility of God's Existence, they would see the obvious as everyone else does. In fact, probably much of their fanatical hatred for religion is driven by subconscious motives to repress their own instincts, which urges them to believe. Like most of Scientism, Atheism is, at its core, a theory that refutes itself. 

    The fact that Religion (or philosophy) hasn't all the answers to the mysteries of life is no more an argument against it than the belief that Science is false because it can't explain everything. This fallacy is one that Cult leaders exploit: whackos like  Owen Benjamin and Aga Khan who are simultaneously religious heretics and science deniers but are believed infallible both by themselves and by the fools who follow them. 

    For those---and there are many---who've grown up without any religious instruction, the thing to do is to trust your instincts first. Ignore the phony pundits and trust God to lead you on the right path. Faith doesn't require one to know everything---which is impossible anyway since Eternity, Infinity, and Divine Perfection are beyond any human understanding. One needs only the general idea the simple mustard seed of faith and go on from there. 

WHAT'S BEHIND THE WAVE OF STORE CLOSINGS?

    While the American public is busy this Easter weekend obsessing over politicians' sex-lives and celebrating trans-positivity, Corporate America quietly has been engaging in a series of drastic cutbacks across the country---mostly in urban areas. In the last month, at least thirty major box-store chains have closed locations in major cities. The corporations mostly doing this are Walmart, Target, and Amazon. 

   A few decades ago, these predatory organizations moved into neighborhoods, driving out of business their smaller local competitors. This massive wealth-transfer created monopolies in most cities; but today, these same robber-barons are abandoning their captive consumer bases leaving what sociologists call 'food deserts' in their wake: that is, no supermarkets or retailers within convenient distances for most shoppers. 

     What is behind this sudden decline? According to Wall Street, these stores have become 'unprofitable.' This is after decades of having zero competition. Conservative pundits have noted that these stores are victims of rising crime and lack of will from City officials to stop any of it. While that is true; it doesn't add up as the whole story.

     Most of us understand by now that Corporate America and the American Government are essentially the same things. We also know that these same Corporate interests are subsidizing supporting political leaders who defund the police and are soft-on-crime. On the surface, this would seem to be a contradiction in purposes. Obviously, it would make more economic sense to invest in these communities to make them safer and more profitable. 

    But this is assuming that the Oligarchs actually want to save these neighborhoods. The fact is that have been set up to fail and urban blight is what these leaders actually. Remember that we're talking about a gang who employed a fake epidemic to crush the Middle Class and currently are managing hyperinflation under the guise of fake shortages. Their ultimate plan---which they've not been reticent about advertising---is to depopulate our cities and build back better with new so-called 'smart cities' which they wholly own and manage. 

     The Official Narrative behind the Smart Cities concept is that our old models of urban growth based on freedom of movement and association---as well as the Free Market---are outdated and unsustainable. We have the technology to design new, more efficient urban areas from scratch from top-down planning. The reality is that, in our current trend towards Inverted Totalitarianism, the Smart City is a modernized Concentration Camp. In the new model, dissidents aren't rounded up, imprisoned and subject to forced labor: instead, they throw themselves in voluntarily for the safety and security that a de facto prison camp offers. 

    In other words, the urban blight we're seeing in major American cities is part and parcel of the Strategy of Tension, which we've discussed here before, showing its roots in the psychology of cults. The Strategy of Tension is defined as "a method of social control involving a series of covert attacks upon a population, intended to promote stress and fear amongst them. The purpose is, by inducing a mistrust of one another and of the world at large, to increase child-like dependence upon perceived authority figures such as national governments." Economic insecurity is being sown deliberately amongst the population to 'force' the authoritarian system of the Smart City into being by popular assent.

   Prophecies of Economic Collapse have been circulating for the last three decades, but as we've argued all along, there will be no 'collapse' in the same sense as the Great Depression of a century ago. What we are witnessing is a controlled demolition, where the economy gradually declines for the middle and lower classes while becoming more heavily concentrated in the hands of the upper classes. In reality, the Great Reset has no use for a Middle Class---at least not in the sense that we understand the term. Their concept of a Middle Class resembles more the privileged class of Feudalism: i.e., the non-nobles who live better than their peers by enforcing and promulgating the will of their overlords. Postmodern newspeak has given this concept the more pleasant-sounding term of a Social Credit System, but the concept is the same. 

    These same would-be Elites likewise haven't been silent about their beliefs that only about 1/5 of the world's population is necessary to sustain them and their parasitic lifestyles. The oft-heard term during the Scamdemic of freezing out of society of those unwilling to go along with the New Order wasn't simply a talking-point dreamed up on the spot. In a recent interview, Klaus Schwab was asked what would become of the other 80%, to which Schwab equivocally replied "They'll be taken care of." How exactly this is going to happen appears to be a gradual phasing-out of the subspecies---the class that most of us belong to---who'll largely be relegated to living in the ghettos of our decaying cities or in dying small-towns of rural America. 

   This isn't some far-fetched conspiracy theory: the Elites have been discussing it for the last 25 or so years, and continue to do so. In 1997, two journalists published a book titled The Global Trap based upon the 1995 State of the World Forum sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation. Deep State operative Zbigniew Brzezinski suggested to the Global Elite gathered there that "a mixture of intoxicating entertainment and sufficient nourishment can tranquilise the frustrated minds of the globe’s population."

   "A fifth of all job-seekers will be enough to produce all the goods and perform all the top-flight services that the world society can afford…. What about the others? Will 80 percent of those willing to work be without a job? 'Certainly'… The question in the future will be 'to have lunch or be lunch,' to eat or be devoured...The term 'tittytainment' makes the rounds...The frustrated population of the world could be kept happy with a mixture of numbing entertainment and adequate food. The managers soberly discuss the possible doses and reflect how the wealthy fifth can employ the superfluous remnant.

   "The organisers of the three memorable days in the Fairmont imagined themselves underway to a new civilisation. However, the direction envisaged by the assembled experts from the executive floors and science leads directly back into the pre-modern age. The world model of the future follows the formula 20 to 80. The one-fifth society is brewing in which the excluded will be immobilised with 'tittytainment.'"

     Since 1995, of course, the Elites have learned the effectiveness of adding high-potency narcotics into the mix. At least here in the US, we need little more than common observation to confirm how effective the combination of salacious infotainment, proliferated food assistance, and access to drugs has been in stupefying and pacifying the public. A year later, another deep politician named Lee Silver published in his book Remaking Eden:

    “The GenRich—who account for ten percent of the American population—[will] all carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class… Naturals [unaltered humans] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee."

    Amazingly, as recently as 1997, people actually thought that human-to-chimpanzee love was an unrealistic scenario! That aside, however, it remains highly questionable as to whether Good King Klaus and his merry-men really are determined to leave us 80% to drift off into narcotic and incel oblivion. Considering that his whole Fourth Industrial Revolution philosophy---as well as the fundamental premise behind Inverted Totalitarianism---centers on cost-effectiveness to the Elites, it's somewhat hard to imagine that group floating 4/5 of the world's population on some sort of welfare scheme out of simple humanitarian concerns. Further incidents like the brutal suppression of the Canadian Truckers' Protests, the brutality launched against Dutch farmers, Australia's thuggish measures during the Scamdemic lockdowns, and our own Junta's rather obvious intolerance towards its opposition certainly should give us all grounds for some healthy scepticism here. 

    

    In fact, under the previous very pro-WEF Saudi monarchy, one such Smart City was planned. (It should be noted that, just like American prisons, these smart cities are expected to be constructed in remote areas like deserts. Getting in will be a lot easier than getting out). In the Saudi experiment, "efforts to relocate the indigenous residents of the Neom site, who’ve lived there for generations, have been turbulent, devolving on one occasion into a gun battle," according to one report. Dezeen reported late last year that: 

    "Three men forcibly evicted from the Neom site in Saudi Arabia have been sentenced to death...the three members of the Huwaitat tribe were sentenced after being forcibly evicted and displaced to make way for the Neom megaproject, which is planned for the northeast of the country. The men, who are believed to have criticised the displacement of locals to make way for the Neom development, were sentenced by Saudi Arabia's Specialized Criminal Court on 2 October. Shadli al-Huwaiti, Ibrahim al-Huwaiti and Ataullah al-Huwaiti "were detained in 2020 for opposing eviction." 

    That gives rather a different construction on Schwab's promise that we'll be taken care of if we find ourselves on the outside of the Great Reset. What of those on the inside? Well, they'll have clean sidewalks, low crime, a free 'living space,' nobody will go hungry (though their diets will be designed), and presumably plenty of access to drugs. Everything that the Elites believe that one needs will be within a 15-minute walking distance of said domiciles in an LGBTQ-positive, smoke-free (well except for marijuana smoke), sugar-free and meat-free (well except for those with high social credit scores), and gun-free (well except for the guards security forces) environment. 

    The downside to all of this is that, as Indian engineer Aman Jabbi pointed out, one of the protocols upon which Smart Cities are based is termed Zero Trust. "Zero Trust is a cybersecurity protocol where by default we are going from a world of implicit allow to default deny." This is something that logically we would expect from a population raised in a Strategy of Tension and intentional fomenting of political and social divisiveness. As one can imagine, spying on one's neighbors will be encouraged, the personal is political is naturally an unspoken truth in such an environment. 

   "The zero trust protocol and 15 minute city / 20 minute neighborhood facilitates mass-surveillance and restriction of the population's freedom of travel. Facial recognition and ubiquitous CCTV is just one way that the population of smart cities could be constantly tracked. If inhabitants attempt to travel beyond their prescribed area may find "smart" devices such as public transport (or doors!) uncooperative, so goods or services might only be available within their prescribed area, which becomes a 'barless prison.'"

    Despite the fact that Soros-backed foundations openly admit that the Climate Change scam is essentially a lockdown/control scheme to which Smart Cities are linked, anyone else who dares suggest such a thing is publicly hooted as a 'Conspiracy Theorist,' so there is, sadly very little use in trying to convince the average Ameroboob NPC into believing otherwise. It does, however, underscore the need of those who still cherish their liberties to organize within our own communities, because the time is coming when the 80% of us expendables are going to have to rely upon each other. 

TRASH CULTURE'S FINEST HOUR

      Back in 18th Century Scotland---a country that would have been a paradise to today's Neocons with its established order, rank, and privilege---it wasn't uncommon in these bucolic small communities that rumors occasionally began spreading. Many times, these rumors would filter into the ears of churchwardens and elders of the Church of Scotland: especially when they involved a man and woman who were spending a bit of time together alone. When this happened, the elders would discuss it at their regular meeting and appoint wardens to investigate. Generally this ended with the couple appearing before the board and making a public confession, followed by a thorough tongue-lashing and probationary period. I'm not certain how much of a deterrent this humiliating affair actually was, given how often such cases appear in the Church's Archives. At any rate, fortunately some of our forefathers heard of a newly-independent country across the Atlantic where churches and nobles weren't spying on people, and so found a ship and headed abroad. 

     Younger readers probably don't remember the attitudes of descendents of people who left Old Europe. As child, I'd occasionally hear a family member in the other room: "Say, did you hear about Mary Smith? It's said that when her husband John's away, that the mail carrier always has mail that needs a signature and stops in for a hour or so..." About which time an elderly voice would interrupt: "Is that any of your business? How'd you feel if the neighbors were talking about you like that?" 

    Well, that was then, this is now. It feels strange to say that, considering that we're talking about a time so recent that our current Head-of-State was already serving in Congress. 

   Somewhere between the time when Congressmen actually conducted investigations into things like governmental abuses of power and today's disgraceful spectacle of a former president being brought before a civil Inquisition---sex scandals have become something of a national past-time as Supreme Court nominees, politicians, and many celebrities have learned to their mortification. The same Whacko Left-Wing doing high-fives and screaming in fake outrage over today's Trump Indictment no doubt would read the above anecdote about the Church of Scotland and recoil in horror over what those judgemental bigots were doing; when they ought to be taking a good look in a mirror. 

  We really have become a nation of voyeurs. A Peeping Tom ought to be our national emblem. Americans seem to have evolved this weird dualism about (heterosexual) relations. I think that it has to do largely with our wholesale abandonment of Privacy Rights. The average Ameroboob seems to equate in his dope-saturated mind anything relating to heterosexuality as dirty and impure. "After all, people do it in the dark, behind closed doors. It must be something shameful. Otherwise, why don't they do it on Instagram or OnlyFans where we can all see? What are they trying to hide?" 

   Which explains a lot about our national fascination with online pornography and acceptance of perverts holding 'Pride Parades.' It also explains the borderline- neurotic micromanagement of intersexual relations that goes on in schools, workplaces, etc. Paranoia and Sexual Hysteria do not go well together. In an individual it's bad enough; but when it effects a whole society, it becomes an extremely destructive force. If that sounds like an exaggeration, ask yourselves one question: think back from all the sex scandals from the late 80s to today and name one positive thing that's come out of any of them? 

   While we're pondering that question, here are a few other thoughts. Have all the draconian workplace rules against employee relationships improved American productivity one iota? (In fact, it seems to me that many successful small businesses are husband-and-wife teams). Has all of the paedohysteria and sexual paranoia in our schools improved educational outcomes one bit? Has the near-constant Media fixation on sex scandals made us better-informed voters or come up with constructive solutions to our national problems? 

   The answer is no: in fact, what it's produced is a couple of generations of singles walking around on eggshells lest they offend somebody or cross a line; while at the same time giving us a subculture of Incels, gender dysphorics, porn addicts, and other unwholesome channels for sexual repression. In short, we've created a culture that maximizes sexual tension and offers deviance as the only 'acceptable' way to relieve it. At least our forefathers in Old Europe intended to channel sexual tension into matrimony and parenthood---and the real disgrace here is that even their heavy-handed methods were at least well-intentioned and actually produced some good. 

   In all of the upcoming lurid press-leaks, finger-pointing, narrative-spinning, and pundit-spouting following the Trump Indictment, the one thing that we can all be assured of is nothing positive will result for anybody. Meanwhile, the economy will continue to sink, schools will continue to fail, crime will continue unabated---nobody will care about other scandals like the Nordstream sabotage or the bioweapons labs in Ukraine; or the mounting death-toll from the Loyalty Vaxx or Opioid overdoses---in short the Great Reset will go marching forward while Ameroboobs rush to the 420 Store before the CNN exclusive reveals what color underwear Stormy Daniels wore on fateful night that changed history. 

ARE WE BEING SET UP FOR ANOTHER 'SUMMER OF RAGE?'

      So---appropriately on All Fools Day---Left-Wing cranks and crackpots across the country are planning a Trans Day of Vengeance. Right on the very grounds of the US Supreme Court too, although the Media is encouraging it to spread elsewhere. Leading up to the event, we had a mass-murder in Tennessee on Monday, followed by a violent riot in the same state today, as well as in neighboring Kentucky. The media swine have already turned the Nashville shooter into a martyr; greatly reminiscent of Fentanyl Floyd a few years ago. This time, don't forget your masks.

    As if this weren't throwing enough gasoline on the fire; the Junta took the unprecedented step of ordering its henchmen having a Grand Jury indict the President-in-Exile---for basically acting like a typical rich heterosexual. Now, of course, indicting someone whom many of us still consider the legitimate President with an obviously sham case in a politically-motivated trial: that couldn't possibly lead to violence, could it? 

    If the Trump Indictment does lead to violence---and the Regime is certainly not above creating an 'incident' if a real one fails to materialize---I think that we can all guess what direction the reaction is going to take. We saw a warm-up to this in 2020. Armed Leftist thugs taking over entire city blocks were said to be engaging in a Summer of Love while a rather milquetoast protest over a blatantly stolen national election was spun as a sinister plot to take over the country. If things go the way that they appear to be planned, we'll see homo/Antifa/BLM engage in the most egregious acts of anarchistic thuggery and get a free pass. Meanwhile, old women who show up at the Court to support Trump will get gassed and beaten with police nightsticks. 

    The bottom line here is to remember that what the Elites want is partisan violence. Our side is in a double-bind. If we react, they'll label us 'extremists' and crack down. If we don't react, they'll perceive us as weak and crack down anyway. All of those decades of Conservative apathy and looking out for #1 didn't really help us much in the (then) future, did it? 

   Why is this scenario possible? Why would the Elites open a second round of domestic terror? Because they have everything to gain and nothing to lose by doing so. They're now in the third year of consolidating absolute power. Indicting the symbolic head of the Opposition while turning their stormtroopers loose on the public is hardly unheard of during the early stages of a dictatorship. In fact, it's the very same pattern that same Elites ran in Ukraine in 2014 and elsewhere. 

   All of those on the Right who still want to pretend that we too haven't undergone a Color Revolution are running out of room for Denial. Likewise---to put it bluntly---if we want to see our Republic restored we're rapidly running out of time to do it. What Conservative leadership we actually have left needs to pull together and take a stand; and the American people need to have their backs for once if they do. Given the recent history of both, that scenario is hard to imagine, but it really would work if they tried. 

THE NASHVILLE SHOOTING AND BEYOND

    In 1999, two homosexual lovers named Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris---part of a high-school clique called the Gay Trenchcoat Mafia---executed an elaborate massacre scheme ending in a suicide pact against Columbine High School in Colorado. The vermin in the Corporate Media dropped the word 'gay' when describing the group of young thugs and downplayed any reference to the duo's orientation. Klebold and Harris had---like many of their demographic---a hatred for religion and targeted Christians specifically---especially Christian girls. This fact was also downplayed while the Official Narrative spun the story by deflecting attention to peripheral issues like school bullying, school security, and gun control.

   Their tactics haven't changed since 1999; except that in 2023, the Media has taken to a deliberate policy of actively encouraging such violence. After a week of Internet outrage over Christian hockey players' refusal to participate in a Humiliation Ritual; and celebrities calling for the murder of Christians; and 'activists' calling for violence against the State of Tennessee; a member of the mentally-unbalanced community at whom these messages were directed flipped out and committed a massacre at a Christian school. Six people (including three small children) were killed before the assailant was sent to Tartarus under a barrage of police gunfire. 

   And Americans are scratching their heads wondering how it could happen. It's not difficult to figure that out and not even the first time it's happened recently. As pointed out in the previous article, the sexual deviancy manifested by the so-called 'LGBTQ Community' is typically symptomatic of deeper problems. They have long been known as a demographic prone to violence. So when you bombard such a demographic with encouragement to violence and it happens, why are we surprised? 

   Are we saying here that the xhe in question was deliberately egged on and incited to do what they did? Yes: we are. To assume that yesterday's tragedy wasn't deliberately planned, we have to believe that:

  1. None of the Media figures calling for violence against Christians actually hoped it would happen:

  2. Despite these Media figures employing the same talking-points and the fact that they typically work for the same organizations, that they weren't working in concert;

  3. It never occurred to any of them that nutjobs were in their audience who might be influenced by their words. 

  Of course they wanted this to happen; and they were acting on orders of the Corporate Oligarchs who desire to foment division and chaos, as well as driving other sociopolitical agendas. Following the same propaganda pattern that they successfully employed in 1999, their media stooges are dutifully spinning the 'narrative' to school bullying and blaming the 'gun culture.' Not a peep out of any of these Compassionate Liberals though about dealing with our out-of-control national problems of untreated mental illness or Media complicity in sending out dog-whistles to the emotionally unstable. 

   Contrary to media propaganda, America does not have the highest rates of gun violence in the world. However, we do have the highest rates of suicide by firearm and mass-murders. This ought to tell us that our problems stem from much deeper issues than access to guns. Our problems with mass-violence are emanating from two causes: a corrupted social structure that places little value on humanity and places maximum value on force and fraud as means to an end. 

   The mid-1990s were when we first saw the phenomenon of mass-shootings on a regular basis. What changed about that time? Well, for starts we saw a New World Order, a Kinder, Gentler America, and a Pax Americana opened up. Schools started throwing out Merit and imposing fake inclusiveness (i.e reverse discrimination). Our 'compassionate' politicians decided that it was cruel to interfere with the chosen lifestyles of the mentally ill when Big Pharma could sell them psych-dope. Our cultural values shifted to what is essentially a Might Makes Right philosophy. 

   Since the 1990s, there hasn't been a social issue that Force or Fraud didn't emerge as the answer to---as long as one was big enough and powerful enough to do it. Our Government reserved the 'right' to intervene militarily anytime, anywhere, they pleased: with remote-controlled bombs loaded with depleted uranium. Or, we could embargo essential goods and services from any 'regime' who wouldn't bow to our exceptionalism. Failing that, we could stage Color Revolutions. Domestically, it wasn't much better. Schools and most large workplaces turned into virtual prisons: full of arbitrary rules and conditions. Today, students, workers, and renters have no rights that administrators, employers, or landlords need respect. Police and courts became militarized and a two-tiered 'Justice System' established where money and politics determine guilt or innocence. As we saw during the Scamdemic, the State has no issue with domestic embargoes against people and businesses they consider non-essential.

   The 1990s and since have seen entire thriving cities turned into ghost-towns and ghettoes because outsourcing their main industries was cheaper. Media conglomerates freely shut down views that deviate from the official narrative while promoting blatant Government/Corporate propaganda. Across the board we see this. So it's no wonder in this sort of environment that a percentage of the population either lashes out inwardly (suicide) or outwardly (mass-shootings). 

   Dead White Male and Founding Father Thomas Paine said this about the mass-violence in Jacobin France, and it applies today: "Let us therefore examine how men came by the idea of punishing others in this manner. They learn it from the governments that they live under; and retaliate with the punishments that they have been accustomed to behold. The heads stuck upon pikes which remained for years on the Temple-Bar differ nothing in the horror of the scenes of the heads being carried about on pikes in the Paris streets: yet this was done by the English government. It may be said that it signifies nothing to a man what is done to him after he is dead; but it signifies much to the living. It either tortures their feelings or it hardens their hearts; in either case, it instructs them how to punish when power falls into their hands. Lay then the axe to the root, and teach governments humanity. It is their sanguinary punishments which corrupt mankind."

    Yes: we are seeing increases in mass-shootings and gratuitous violence in America because the perpetrators of these deeds have learned callousness and inhumanity from those in authority. The Media encouragement only makes it worse; but can anyone explain how the brutality of American contractors murdering Arab civilians in cold blood or a lone nut shooting down a classroom of Kindergarteners is materially different? Or US leaders deciding to settle personal grudges by killing foreign leaders is different than a disgruntled employee taking a gun and settling scores with his 'untouchable' managers? After seeing decades of corrupt Administrative judges and social workers destroy families and consign innocent children and minors to abusive environments---we act shocked when we hear that some psycho kidnaps and tortures people in his basement. 

    Problems like we witnessed at Nashville are problems entirely of our own making. If we want to stop these problems, then we need to get out of our collective stupor---stop blaming gun owners and school bullies, or the politicians---and take back control of our communities. It's doubtful that will happen, though. It's easier for the Left to virtue-signal and the Right to demand more draconian force than it is to face problems and look for solutions. Meanwhile, the violence will go on and the Elites will go on laughing all the way to the bank.