IT'S SPRINGTIME IN THE SECURITY STATE

     Today, we're beginning a new month and a new quarter of 2021. We did a little housecleaning on the Blogroll and Links. In this imperfect world, nobody agrees 100% of the time with anybody, but that's not what this was about. I got tired of constantly reading headlines like "Bad News for Biden at Border!" "Psaki pressed on Hunter Tapes!" "Fox News Slams AOC!" "More Evidence of Voter Fraud Uncovered!" and similar things. Not that the Junta shouldn't be criticized; but, frankly, I'm tired of this Conservative Denialism that imagines that it's all politics as usual and that everything bad now will blow over by the next election. Let's do a quick summary of the past 15 months and ask ourselves a question afterward:

    1. After a failed Impeachment, the Governors of most U.S. States seized power under a fake 'emergency.' They locked down their political opponents' constituency's source of income and banned Freedom of Association and Assembly. These temporary powers are still in force a year later in many places.

    2. The Left created a martyr in George Floyd and the Corporate sponsors behind Antifa and BLM turned them loose on the public. They leveraged this violence to defund and break up police units; again who largely supported their political opposition.

    3. They knowingly put persons infected with influenza among Seniors (again who typically support their opposition) in nursing-homes, resulting in the death of thousands.

   4. They required sovereign citizens to wear distinctive clothing and restricted travel and services for those who do not comply. 

   5. They blatantly stole a national and several local elections; shut down any criticism in the media or public forums which challenged the fake results.

   6. During this entire time, they have purged schools, the military, businesses, and government of political opposition and this purge is ongoing.

   7. They have conducted targeted wealth-transfers to themselves and their supporters while closing political fundraising for opponents.

   8. They have ordered a flag besides the national one to be flown at federal buildings. 

   9. They have taken measures to efface our cultural symbols and delete our history. 

  10. They are currently working on plans to implement gun control, travel permits, and blatantly discriminatory policies against their opponents' political constituency. They are in the process as well of conducting show-trials against those who oppose them or have committed politically-incorrect thought crimes.

   Now, my question is: "What part of the definition of the term 'Revolution' are you not understanding?" Do any of these actions suggest that the current leaders of the Union actually intend to leave office gracefully in 2024 after a fair and transparent election? Do any of these actions suggest that they intend to be bound by the Constitution, or the popular will? Does anybody really believe that Financial Oligarchs who invested in---and fully believe in---the Great Reset Agenda are going to lay down and leave because people want them to?

   Conservatives need to screw their eyeballs back into their heads, stop listening to Controlled-Opposition News and get it through their thick skulls that the sociopolitical dynamic has changed radically since 2016. Hunter Biden's tapes don't matter. Hillary Clinton's e-mail's don't matter. Neither does uncovering more evidence of voter fraud 90 days too late. Neither does Joe Biden's obvious mental incapacity nor Kamala Harris' incompetence. They are mere figureheads and have nothing whatsoever to do but take and enforce orders already prepared for them. 

   The U.S. has gone through exactly the same kind of Color Revolution that the Lords of High Finance have executed against other countries. They are by no means finished either. 

   It is true that there is hope: a few Senators and Congressmen are standing up to the Junta; and a handful of States (the Dakotas, Florida, Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, and recently Wisconsin and Kansas), but the stakes are high. Don't imagine for one minute that the Elites are above bringing in foreign troops if they think that they have to.

       NPC's can chortle over that suggestion all they want to; but the fact is that the Junta can even legally decide to do it if they wish. That great 'Conservative' George Bush Junior---with the complicity of a Republican-controlled Congress---signed a series of laws and executive orders authorizing blanket military seizures of power in case of 'national emergency.' BTW, influenza outbreaks were among the types of 'emergencies' specifically singled out by the RINOs. These same RINOs also lobbied for---and got---the legal means to proscribe American nationals as enemy combatants. The Democrats who supposedly opposed these policies during the earlier 'war on terror' national panic attack have never repealed any of them and fully favor their implementation during the Scam-demic.

    What about foreign troops? Well, let's not forget that the U.S. maintains several mutual defense pacts which it has often invoked to justify military interventions abroad---these same treaties can be used to bring international troops to our streets as well. The Elites themselves don't even bother with treaties. They have openly admitted to using foreign proxies in overthrowing governments. The Elites have shipped in foreign nationals to foment regime change in Syria, Ukraine, and elsewhere. The Soros-backed 'migrant caravans' to the U.S. and the flooding of Western Europe with refugees from the Middle East are part of the same techniques. Now think of all of the propaganda coming from the Wall Street-Beltway Axis lately about alleged right-wing 'domestic threats' and ask yourselves if it really can't happen here. 

    "Oh," the Conservative punditocracy objects, "But the American people would never stand for that!!!" OK, so now that the Junta is working overtime to finish emasculating our own military, defunding the police forces, cutting federal funding to States that don't submit to them, and enacting sweeping gun control---exactly how much standing up are we going to be capable of doing? And I think we've all seen just how willing the average American is to take a stand about much of anything.

    We don't need to give up the fight to restore our Republic, but we need to start facing the fact that throwing up a few prayers in church not backed by any action or waiting for November 2022 and voting Republican is not going to solve anything. The current rulers of the United States are ruthless, unscrupulous, and fanatical. Even their own pundits admit that they would remorselessly kill anyone who gets in their way; and even a few long-time Democrats are expressing concern over the course that the Regime is taking. 

   What we must do is begin and encourage resistance at the local level. Disengage, Disconnect, Disunite. Support local leaders who are working to make our communities independent of the Junta, Corporate America, and their political puppets. Support county sheriffs who refuse to enforce illegal decrees. Disregard and disobey the Elites' orders whenever possible and encourage others to do so. Cultivate self-sufficiency. If they force you to comply, follow your conscience, but never volunteer. We have to beat the Enemy with hard work and determination, not with rumor, innuendo, and false hopes.

   

   

THE CHAUVIN SHOW TRIAL AND THE MYTH OF SYSTEMIC RACISM

    This week, the Junta launched the much-publicized Show Trial for former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, falsely accused of murdering a Black thug in his custody. The thug was later determined to have died of an opiate overdose and Chauvin cleared by a review-board, but the Putschists shopped the case around to medical examiners who could be had for a price. 

    Show Trials and Kangaroo-Courts always follow in the wake of a revolution. The Regime right now is trying to set up a narrative of so-called Systemic Racism and alleged threats of 'White Supremacy' to justify further consolidation of its power. First was a failed attempt to put the legitimate President on trial. Coming up shortly is the mass-trial of over 400 'rioters' who protested in Washington, D.C. on January 6th. The purpose of these farces is strictly propaganda. They are conducted to give an illusion of legality and legitimacy to the Regime's policies to those who support it; while striking terror in others who realize what it is and may be inclined to resist it. 

    The unthinking American public has, by and large, already been desensitized to sham trials and acts of legal injustice. The Corporate Media for the last several years have made the U.S. Legal System almost a genre in their 'Infotainment' journalism. It's always noteworthy that lawyers and judges are, these days, always portrayed as great heroes. In real life, of course, most of them are barely one step away from a jail cell themselves. 

   So-called systemic racism---and the supposed need to eradicate it---is great camouflage to cover much of the Junta's activities. 'Systemic Racism' is really the sociological equivalent of the Scam-demic. No one can define it---nor even prove its existence---but Ameroboobs are conditioned to fear it and fly into panic if it is even mentioned in their presence. White Supremacists themselves occupy only a miniscule collection of kooks in the 'Red Pilled' corner of the Internet; but MSM promotion and sensationalism has America convinced that a White Supremacist lurks behind every blade of grass; ready to whip out that assault weapon and mow down entire shopping malls. How a nation managed to elect a Black President for two terms and still be systemically racist, nobody seems to want to ask. 

    

       In reality, President Trump actually did much good for minorities. Like the rest of America, minorities mostly sold him out in the end. Trump initiated infrastructure projects on Indian Reservations, strengthened the Tribal Police to fight out-of-control crime, enforced Treaty Rights on Indian-claimed land. The Indians not only never protested the Election Fraud, they actively participated in it. The Trump Administration expanded science education in primarily Black communities---a problem that the Left ignored for decades. Trump campaigned openly in Black churches; he led initiatives to suppress gang activity in the inner cities and Black unemployment was at its lowest levels ever before 2020. The Black Community not only didn't protest the Election, they spent the Summer of 2020 burning down entire city blocks, threatening the White House, effacing national monuments, forcing White people to kneel to them, etc.

   The Trump Administration launched initiatives in Hispanic communities to put down violent gangs like MS-13. Hispanic employment rates soared. Trump blocked the Soros-backed migrant caravans---people who had been kicked out of every part of Latin America---from entering. Not a peep from Hispanic leaders about the Election Fraud. Asian and Pacific Islanders? Trump expanded infrastructure spending throughout Hawaii and the Pacific Territories. He forced Corporate America to stop polluting the islands and pay restitution for the years they'd been exploiting the people and resources. The result? Hawaii voted 63% for the Junta and the territorial referendums had about the same margins. Trump was said to be the most pro-Israel President ever; one of his first acts was to intervene personally in stopping a wave of anti-Semitic crimes. Jews supported the Junta by about a 2 to 1 margin.

    Who says that minorities can't assimilate? They have successfully adopted American attitudes like pusillanimity, opportunism, ingratitude, and a proclivity to panic at the drop of a hat. 

   What's especially sad about this is that minorities had real power at their fingertip and blew it. If any of them had mobilized and come out in support of Trump, the Putsch would have collapsed. It would have exposed the whole 'narrative' of Systemic Racism for the lie that it really is. But no; it was Orange Man Bad and Let's Go Get Whitey---all for a few handouts and a chance to sate their envy and revenge on the White man who isn't---and never was---their enemy. Now, they are under the same yoke of an evil oligarchy who makes no secret of its hatred for humanity in general. Whites are the target---for now. Let's not forget that these Elites don't have an especially sterling track record in their policies towards Blacks, or towards other minorities either. Minorities are simply there to be used---like tools---to advance the Oligarchy's agenda. Descendants of today's minorities (assuming there are any) will look back upon this disgraceful chapter in human history with shame. 

 

   

  

IN SATAN'S SHOES

       I think that we probably all have noticed by now that Satanism is in vogue in America's postmodern dystopia. The entertainment branch of the Corporate Media---which has no shortage of devil-worshipers within its ranks---has been promoting Satanism through television shows, movies, music, etc. for the last several years. Now, a Hollywood homosexual and some creepy 'artists' have created a limited-edition shoe style celebrating His Sooty Highness. They aren't shaped like cloven hooves (I think they'd actually be funny if they were); they're regular Nike Air Max 97 shoes modified with pentagrams and supposedly tainted with human blood. To their credit, Nike has distanced itself from the product and is reportedly preparing a lawsuit. Despite the hefty price tag, the Devil Shoe sold out in less than a minute. That's even faster than chicken sandwiches on Black Friday!

     I don't think that anyone would deny at this point that Americans are among the most gullible and easily-manipulated people on the planet. What few people realize is how it's actually done. True, Satan is a deceiver and those cultural Elites promoting this stupidity are inspired by him. But there's also a science behind it all. As a writer on the Vigilant Citizen site summed it up a decade ago: 

   "In the past, when changes were imposed on populations, they would take to the streets, protest and even riot. The main reason for this clash was due to the fact that the change was clearly announced by the rulers and understood by the population. It was sudden and its effects could clearly be analyzed and evaluated. Today, when the elite needs a part of its agenda to be accepted by the public, it is done through desensitization. The agenda, which might go against the public best interests,  is slowly, gradually and repetitively introduced to the world through movies (by involving it within the plot), music videos (who make it cool and sexy) or the news (who present it as a solution to today’s problems). After several years of exposing the masses to a particular agenda, the elite openly presents the concept the world and, due to mental programming, it is greeted with general indifference and is passively accepted. This technique originates from psychotherapy." 

    More specifically, it is weaponized Psychotherapy. Like all science, Psychology is morally neutral regarding its techniques. Minds can be healed with Psychotherapy, but can be destroyed by the same knowledge in the wrong hands. (Just as atomic energy, for example, can produce clean and affordable power for everyone, it's misuse can wipe out civilization with a handful of nuclear bombs). 

    Edward Bernays---a relative of Sigmund Freud's---came to America and did exactly that. Now regarded as 'One of the 100 Most Influential Americans of the 20th Century', Bernays became one of the early proponents of the present Deep State and set the pattern VC describes above for manipulating the human mind on a mass-scale. As Everett Martin predicted in a 1933 essay, "When the future historian, an American Sallust or Tacitus, records the downfall of our Republic and its loss of liberties, he will point to the leading place that organized propaganda had in this unhappy business. Sallust tells us how such propagandist tricks as the Romans discovered---bread and circuses---brought about an unholy alliance between the passions of the mob and 'the enlightened few.' Tacitus tells us that when Augustus assumed divine attributes, and tyranny and persecution were later universal, these evils were possible because no one was able to protest. This is also the inevitable end of modern organized propaganda. Once we had an uncomplimentary term for such industry: we called it 'intrigue.' The ambitious few who destroyed the freedom of the Ancients won over the mob by making themselves visible. Today, as Mr. Bernays says, their successors are setting up an 'invisible government.'" Of course, today Sallust and Tacitus are only a couple of dead White males, but Martin's short article is worth a read because much of what he said then is wholly relevant today. 

    Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote to President Roosevelt shortly before WW2 that the proliferation of propagandists in public discourse were "professional poisoners of the public mind, exploiters of foolishness, fanaticism and self-interest." Karl von Weigand, a foreign correspondent for Hearst Newspapers described a 1933 meeting with Bernays where he told him of an encounter with Nazi Propaganda Minister Goebbels. "Goebbels had shown Weigand his propaganda library, the best Weigand had ever seen. Goebbels, said Weigand, was using my book 'Crystallizing Public Opinion' as a basis for his destructive campaign against the Jews of Germany." Bernays said that he was 'shocked' by that revelation, but it did nothing to change either his mind or his habits. He went on to sell his services to several post-War think-tanks and mass-media outlets which became the prototypes for the modern Deep State. 

    Today we've reached a point where drug abuse, dumbed-down schools, and mass-media have reduced the population to accept homo 'marriage', fake pandemics, stolen elections, and Satan-worship while still believing in American Exceptionalism. A handful of crony-capitalist Oligarchs dominate control of the Western radio, television, newspapers, and the Internet. 

    It's also a well-known fact that both homosexual culture and narcotics abuse have strong connections to the occult. It's interesting that St. Paul in Galatians v:20 mentions 'witchcraft' as one of the 'manifest sins of the flesh.' The Greek word is 'pharmakeia' which according to Greek/English dictionaries is defined as follows:

φαρμακεία ἡ, use of drugs; of abortifacients, Sor. 1.59; generally, the use of any kind of drugs, potions , or spells , Pl. Lg. 933b; pl., Id. Prt. 354a, Ti. 89b, Men. 535.9.

   The connection between homosexuality and the occult is also well-known throughout history. Aleistar Crowley---himself a drug addict and known associate of post-WW2 think-tank activists---was the founder of modern-day occult movements among the Elite. According to his biographers, Crowley "was an active bisexual throughout his life, is notable for incorporating 'sex magick,' which involved sexual relations with both men and women, into his occult practices."

   "Materially, Crowley took full benefit of his father's brewery fortune, and in 1895 entered Cambridge University. During this period Crowley had sexual relationships with both men and women. One of his more notable student affairs was with Jerome Pollitt, a female impersonator ten years his senior...In March 1904, while Crowley was in Egypt, he had a revelation, in which he supposedly made contact with his Holy Guardian Angel. Identifying itself as Aiwass, this being allegedly spent three days dictating a text to Crowley. Known as the Book of the Law, it contains the core philosophies that underlie Crowley's esoteric system of thought. According to this work, Crowley was the prophet who would introduce the world to the Age of Horus. This new era, in which sexuality was to occupy a central, honored position, would be characterized by the integration of male and female sexual energies...In 1907 Crowley founded his own occult group, which he named the Order of the Silver Star. One of his notable followers was Victor Neuburg, whose initiation was reported to have included homoerotic elements. In 1909, he traveled with Neuburg to North Africa. There, in the desert, the two men engaged in a series of magical rituals, some of which involved homosexuality."

     But, as we pointed out before, this is mass-psychology weaponized. Sigmund Freud's favorite proverb was "Know Thyself." And knowing oneself, and how the wires are pulled (and who's pulling them) is what undoes all the 'magic.' Religious conversion is a strong antidote, but as Freud proved, even simple human reason can break the power of mass-manipulation. Turning to God instead of the herd for guidance is the next step. 

   Bernays himself wrote that ."We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind." As ominous as that sounds, if one analyzes it, one can see that his whole system is nothing but a house of cards. A handful of people who see through the manipulation, standing up and saying 'NO!' can blow the entire edifice to pieces. 

    If we ever hope to regain our liberties and our country again, it will involve this kind of introspection, repentance, and following through with action. In this case, the action mostly involves refusing to submit oneself to the so-called 'New Normals' and other cultural 'narratives.' 

 

ONWARD TO TOTALITARIANISM

     Despite all of the evidence to the contrary, Ameroboobs like to keep the illusion going that Self-Government is actually still operative in the United States. Amidst growing concern that the Junta's figurehead leader hadn't bothered to give a single press conference, the Elites permitted him to speak before an audience of Mainstream Media personnel with carefully-scripted questions this week. He had really nothing substantial to say, but one casual remark stood out.

     One of the Media shills began asking him about running for re-election in 2024; rather an odd question for someone less than 100 days into his first term. After some pointless banter, Biden said: "Look, I don't even know if there will be a Republican Party in 2024."

     Oops! Looks like Biden let the cat out of the bag on that one. Both the Liberal Media and the Controlled Conservative Opposition Press have tried various spins on Biden's suggestion. I don't think there's anything to spin. Biden simply stated what he knows to be the truth. 

    We have been saying here ever since the November coup that one of the Junta's goals is to establish a one-party state. It has been their policy all along. Shortly after seizing control from the Sanders Faction, the DNC brought Sanders' people in to craft a so-called Unity Manifesto in exchange for the Radical Left's support for the Coup. They cut a similar deal with McConnell and the other RINOs to support the so-called "peaceful transition of power." It's somewhat naive to imagine that all of this effort is going to go away in four years with a smooth hand-over of Government to Trump supporters. 

    In addition to that, the Commercial Oligarchs who backed the Coup have set a pretty solid date of 2030 to have their Great Reset policies enacted. Anyone who's read through most of their documents can't help but notice the frequency with which terms denoting urgency and immediate action are invoked. It's also quite telling how infrequently references to opposition---or even debate---are. 

   The suggestion of bringing in a one-party system is going to raise a predictable chorus of jeers from the NPC faction who gets its opinions from late-night stand-up comedy-clubs. But the Regime is already moving in that direction, and has been since seizing power. What their pretended motive is going to be centers on an ineffectual pro-Trump rally that took place on January 6th and was magnified by the Revolutionaries as some attempted overthrow of the Government. 

      Shortly thereafter, there were moves in both the public and private sectors to censure elected officials who couldn't distance themselves from the Trump Administration fast enough; followed by an abortive attempt to put the legitimate President himself on trial. Frustrated in that endeavor, the Elites still have not given up. There are proposed changes to deny security clearances to those with a record of opposition to the Junta; as well as ideological cleansing in the military. 

    But the nexus of this upcoming phase in the coup centers upon what's being touted as the "largest criminal investigation in U.S. history," under which about 400 scapegoats defendants are being charged with supposed 'sedition' and 'insurrection.' The Elites have been demanding such a show trial, and now that sufficient time has passed for the average Ameroboob to have forgotten about January 6th, they hope to bring it all back with a new and improved narrative. In the meantime, they will exploit and sensationalize any act of alleged political violence---no matter how tenuous the connection---to bolster the idea that the two-party system has failed. 

    Would the American people really fall for such a blatant power-grab?

    Yes, they would. 😔 The average American of today sees too much advantage in sacrificing Liberty for so-called 'security.' It isn't even really security in the sense of safety, except in the case of dumbed-down NPCs. The 'security' most really want is the freedom to profit from the loss of others' freedom. Our Culture closely resembles Ancient Israel of Christ's time. Then, the Pharisees ran a racket where they oppressed the people---supposedly for the Will of God and Jewish Independence---while at the same time working with their Roman overlords and the money-changers. Americans of today are modern Pharisees who spout about Democracy, but go along with the Elites to leech off the productive classes. 

   Our two-party system needs reform; but what it needs in more parties, not fewer. But that wouldn't serve either the purposes of the Elites or the opportunism of the public, which thrives on social division. However, maintaining social divisiveness has become too expensive and too unstable a situation for the Elites to maintain. Growing automation and concentrations of economic power requires less human labor; and their plans call for population reduction anyway. Those things and the urgency of their 2030 deadlines favor collectivism and dictatorship over maintaining an illusion of self-government. The Great Reset is not working for the greater good of humanity any more than the Pharisees were. The sooner that Americans recognize this fact, the sooner they can prepare themselves. 

    

    

     

THE COMING GUN-GRAB

       So, with some RINO support, the Whacko Left Wing in the Rump Congress has passed a couple of new gun-control bills. There have been a couple of mass-shootings this week, too. Some think these are 'false flags' to help promote the passage of these kinds of laws. Actually, what really happens is that the Corporate Media chooses to give coverage to certain incidents when anti-gun legislation comes up. In some U.S. cities, mass-shootings happen fairly frequently, but the Media ignores them to talk about sex 'scandals', fanning Scam-demic hysteria, etc. As bad as these things are, no U.S. cities even rank in the Top Ten 10 worldwide for gun-related deaths, according to the United Nations' own numbers. But Ameroboobs today aren't especially interested in facts. It's all about getting outraged and taking action for the sake of taking action; that's how most 'public policy' is conducted anymore. 

     The nominal American Head of State even jumped on the bandwagon today, demanding that the Senate pass the House Bills. It will likely happen with or without Biden's screeching. The actual rulers of the United States favor it. The new Bills put some further restrictions on firearms purchases (by the general public)---and like most of the legislation preceding it---is aimed at eventually banning private firearm ownership. None of it will stop any of the global arms-trafficking that the Elites engage in, however. 

     Now, my own opinions on gun control laws are well-known. I am categorically opposed to them. The way to stop gun violence in America is to stop proliferating drugs, take known nutcases off the streets, and execute swift and sure justice for those who commit aggression with firearms or other weapons. That is all the 'gun control' we need: that is, controlling the whackos who abuse their freedoms.

     Of course, what our country should do and what it will do are two entirely different things. Most likely, we're closer to outright gun confiscation than most of us realize. The pro-2nd Amendment groups and politicians vow that it will never happen. But the reality is that there is absolutely no popular will to prevent it. If the events of the past 12-15 months have taught us anything, it's that the majority of Americans---the American Right included---are a collection of losers, cowards, and fools. We are literally living in the weakest, most morally bankrupt, and most ignorant generation that America has ever produced. 

     Nonetheless there's a chorus from the American Right to the effect that taking our guns will touch off a second Civil War or next American Revolution, or something.

     Well, the Government also has no right to restrict gun sales through the mail, or to require background checks or registrations, or to prohibit manufacturing or modifying guns, or to limit magazine capacity a gun-owner can have, or to establish gun-free zones, or to prohibit private sales/transfers of guns---nobody resisted any of these things, and now they are 'laws.' If there's one thing for certain these days: it's that the Left hasn't the least fear of any 'lines in the sand' that Conservatives boast about having. And there's no reason why they should. 

    In 2020 alone, the Left assumed dictatorial powers in several states and forcibly shut down thousands of legal businesses. They opened jails and turned violent thugs loose on cities while disbanding police forces and prosecuting anyone who acted in self-defense. They mandated a national dress code, forcing us to cover our faces like Islamic women have to do. They orchestrated the greatest wealth-transfer in human history. They blatantly stole a national election, along with a myriad of state and local races. In fact, over the last 30 years or so, they've run over the Right with zero resistance. If they want to take our guns, who's going to stop them? 

    It's not like 2020 was unprecedented either. The Left---with plenty of RINO complicity---purged our schools and universities; imposed Political Correctness and Cancel culture; outsourced our jobs to China; practically nullified any Privacy Rights we once had (along with most Property Rights); shoved homo 'equality' down our throats; and the Conservatives have done exactly what about it? Does anybody seriously believe that the 2nd Amendment is going to stop the Elites from violating it at will? They disregard every other part of the Bill of Rights with impunity. 

   Everything just mentioned in the preceding three paragraphs could have been stopped if Conservatives pressured local leaders not to enforce them. And some of us did try to warn people, but Conservative response was predictable...

     It's not going to be any different when the gun-grab ultimately comes. So it's obvious that stocking up on guns and ammo is not going to help much unless you have a very low profile. A better option would be to read up on gunsmith skills and stock up on tools like reloading equipment and accessories. Network with others who have the same abilities. That way, we can keep the Gun Culture alive even if the Elites go as far as confiscation (which they fully intend to do). 

    Above all, don't delude yourself into thinking that it can't happen here. It can, and it likely will. Get to know people of like minds, and keep a close eye on the attitudes of local authorities (i.e., their willingness to look the other way). Make common sense preparations. Like it or not, we're in a position where we are being driven further and further underground and that is not liable to change any time soon. 

    

    

     

THE LEFT'S GREAT GOD DIVIDE

      There was a story that went viral this week about a Republican Congressman who stood up and read a passage from the Bible. Whacko Left-Wing Congressman Jerrold Nadler---a 15-term incumbent and totally on the hook to law firms and Big Media--- lost it and screamed, "what any religious tradition describes as God’s will is no concern of this Congress!” 

    Nadler represents a heavily Jewish District in New York; and the potential unintended consequences of bashing the Jews while he really was venting on Christians sent Corporate Media so-called 'fact-checkers' scrambling. In fairness, Nadler probably has no more respect for the Jewish faith than he has for the Christian one; and actually I somewhat agree with him. Our Congress hasn't cared much about God's Will for a long time; and really is about the last place anybody should look for moral and upstanding citizens. 

    The Corporate Media itself has been on anti-religious streak (moreso than usual) lately. What occasioned this latest round of Leftist outrage was because Pope Francis refused once again to cave into political/financial pressure and bless homo 'marriage' as legitimate. "God cannot bless sin," the Pope said. 

    If there's one thing Liberals can't stand, it's being told 'no'---even if God says it. The ridiculous NPC-baiting show The View, invited CNN's Don Lemon to respond to the Pope. Why anybody thinks that Lemon would know anything about Biblical Ethics is beyond me; but we are talking about an audience that typically believes that anyone who gets on television is an expert. 

  "If you believe something that hurts another person, or does not give someone the same rights or freedoms... I think that this is wrong, and I think that the Catholic Church and many other churches really need to re-examine themselves and their teachings. Because that is not what God is about. God is not about hindering people or even judging people."

  There is some Liberal hubris at its finest. This little homo nobody is telling the Pope and the whole Christian leadership "what God is really all about," and how they "need to re-examine themselves" (i.e. repent). What's especially hypocritical is that these are the same yahoos who are always lecturing us little people on how we should trust the experts. Doubt the Scam-demic or the Climate Change Hoax and these types are the first in everyone's faces screaming that all of the experts say so! 

  So what exactly is Don Lemon's theological expertise? Pope Francis holds five doctoral degrees on the subject. I would think that that would qualify Francis as an expert on religion: but not these intellectually superior beings at CNN. In fact, even Lemon's qualifications as a journalist are fairly thin. Even the Columbia Journalism Review thinks he's a fool. Lemon nearly flunked out of Louisiana State and transferred to the more 'woke' Brooklyn College. He had a mediocre career in broadcasting until CNN decided they needed a homo Black man for virtue-signalling purposes. Now 55 years old, Lemon lives with his boyfriend in apartment. That's what the Corporate Media thinks should be giving the Church instructions on how to behave.

   "If you believe something that hurts another person or does not give someone the same rights and freedoms as others, I believe this wrong." Aside from the fact that Liberals never actually practice this themselves; the statement is just foolish. Literally taken, this would infer that Evil does not exist. Lemon reinforces that idea by saying that "God is not about hindering people or even judging people."

  "I think that religion and the pew are barriers that keep people from getting to know each other." Lemon continued, "So I would say to the Pope and the Vatican to go out and meet people, try and understand people; and do what the Bible and Jesus actually teaches which is to love your fellow-man and to judge not lest ye be judged." 

   Very well; so if Lemon is accusing the Church of bigotry isn't he passing judgment? So far, he hasn't set up any moral criterion by which the Church is wrong, other than quoting one Biblical passage out of context. If God is against judging people, how is Lemon justified in judging the Church? By the same token, if the Church does judge people unfairly, by Lemon's logic, God doesn't care anyway. 

   What Lemon and other Liberals fail to understand is that the Church doesn't 'judge' anybody---in the sense which Lemon means it: the Church follows Christ's command to lead the world to repentance and salvation. This isn't accomplished by simply accepting everybody's behavior with no regard to morality; it's done by educating others to live lives pleasing to God. The Catechism explains as follows: 

    "Conscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. The education of conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject authoritative teachings...Ministries should be exercised in a spirit of fraternal service and dedication to the Church, in the name of the Lord. At the same time the conscience of each person should avoid confining itself to individualistic considerations in its moral judgments of the person's own acts. As far as possible conscience should take account of the good of all, as expressed in the moral law, natural and revealed, and consequently in the law of the Church and in the authoritative teaching of the Magisterium on moral questions. Personal conscience and reason should not be set in opposition to the moral law or the Magisterium of the Church."

    In other words, moral teachings are for the good of all; and the selfishness and stubbornness of those who oppose them don't invalidate them. We are further informed that: 

   "A morally good act requires the goodness of the object, of the end, and of the circumstances together. An evil end corrupts the action, even if the object is good in itself (such as praying and fasting "in order to be seen by men"). The object of the choice can by itself vitiate an act in its entirety. There are some concrete acts - such as fornication - that it is always wrong to choose, because choosing them entails a disorder of the will, that is, a moral evil. It is therefore an error to judge the morality of human acts by considering only the intention that inspires them or the circumstances (environment, social pressure, duress or emergency, etc.) which supply their context. There are acts which, in and of themselves, independently of circumstances and intentions, are always gravely illicit by reason of their object; such as blasphemy and perjury, murder and adultery. One may not do evil so that good may result from it."

    If Lemon had paid more attention to what the Church actually teaches; he'd have understood that religion doesn't stand as "a barrier keeping us from knowing each other," but as barrier between Civilization and what would destroy it. As typical of most Liberals, Lemon is the real bigot, not the Pope. His whole argument is premised in the belief that Christians are motivated by hate and hypocrisy. Therefore, it's not unreasonable to him that Christians need merely change their attitudes and become more accepting. If he were more open-minded and accepting himself, he might see that what keeps him from God is his own selfishness and self-righteousness. 

    It's noteworthy that the Catechism, echoing the words of St. Paul, notes that: "If man commits evil, the just judgment of conscience can remain within him as the witness to the universal truth of the good, at the same time as the evil of his particular choice." Liberals like Lemon are notorious for displaying this behavior, though they never admit it. Why are they so obsessed with getting Christians to accept what they do, or their assent to their beliefs? If they don't believe in God, or care what He thinks, why don't they just go about their business and ignore us?

    The truth is that they cannot. They can't rest content because their instincts demand God's approval, but they want it on their own terms. Lemon and others like him are actually seeking validation and acceptance for their sinful behavior. It's not an act of Christian Love to give them that validation. "The verdict of the judgment of conscience remains a pledge of hope and mercy. In attesting to the fault committed, it calls to mind the forgiveness that must be asked, the good that must still be practiced, and the virtue that must be constantly cultivated with the grace of God." So far from Lemon's assertion that God doesn't judge us; He has given us a natural mechanism by which we judge ourselves. Validating or accepting their behavior hinders their ability to change for the better. 

   Our culture spiritually cripples people in the same way. In the not-too-distant past, Lemon would have been little more than the 'office fag'; shunned by everybody and probably not given any positions of great responsibility. He could have gotten psychological help for his sexual disorder and gone on to be a productive member of society. But instead, he's elevated to a position where he's not only out of his depth professionally; but actually put there precisely because of his sexual dysfunction. Undeserved wealth and power: that is one mechanism by which Satan enslaves people to sin. In our culture today, coming out as openly gay removes many barriers to power, fame, and fortune; while more competent and moral people are shoved aside. 

     That's the real 'barrier' in our culture today: between Good and Evil. What the Left desires is Evil under the facade of 'unity'. The Right needs to face this fact like Pope Francis did, and stop trying to pretend that Evil doesn't exist. 

     

SEXUAL HYSTERIA AND ANGLOSPHERE POLITICS

      So there has been another social firestorm erupting in both America and Australia recently. No, it isn't because of tyrannical acts perpetrated under the Scam-demic; or on account of the millions of people ruined, displaced, or killed during the past year. It isn't even because of the blatant trampling of human rights perpetrated under now year-long temporary emergency powers. The Anglosphere long ago collectively gave up any concern for the Rights of Man or empathy for one's neighbor. Instead, it's Sexual Misconduct Season!

     New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and Australian Attorney-General Christian Porter have been a pair of the most atrocious despots of our recent Color Revolution in the West. With all of that power came inflated egos. Both of these characters got big heads and thought that they could challenge the people who gave them that power. In December, Cuomo signed off on leading an anti-trust lawsuit against Facebook; while in September, Porter backed a law prohibiting Big Tech from manipulating news stories. The law actually passed; requiring Zuckerberg and Schmidt to get a bailout from fellow-Oligarch Rupert Murdoch. Now it's payback time. Right on cue, the allegations started coming out; new accusers come forward on a daily basis; and Angloboob outrage explodes. 

   Granted, I do believe that both Cuomo and Porter should be put on trial and afterwards sent to a firing-squad. But that's for committing crimes like Treason, Conspiracy, Corruption, Murder, and Crimes Against Humanity---not because they allegedly acted like a couple of cads. 

     In our postmodern dystopia, however, being accused of Sexual Misconduct is the worst thing that anyone can be accused of. Nobody ever has defined what 'sexual misconduct' actually means; but these days, nobody wants to split hairs over things like that. We live in an era, after when burning churches and courthouses and setting up 'autonomous zones' are considered 'peaceful protests' while demonstrators who read from the Bible while eating pizza are accused of insurrection. The same society where photographs of boxes of fake ballots are considered baseless claims of voter fraud while a flu outbreak is believed to have amassed more casualties than our last five major wars combined though there is no proof that it has whatsoever.  The same society that votes for politicians who scream about exploitation while demanding that we turn absolute power over to Oligarchs who presumably alone can solve all of our problems.

    The degenerate Anglosphere has this same schizophrenic attitude towards sexuality. We are one of the most sexually repressive and sexually obsessed cultures simultaneously. A businessman can lose his job for flirting with a female secretary; he can also lose it for saying anything critical about public schools hosting Drag Queen Story Hour. Major media figures are destroyed for having love-trysts with their groupies; but pole-dancing at the Grammy Awards and producing obscene music videos is perfectly socially acceptable. We saw lives destroyed at Penn State and Duke University over some locker-room horseplay and frat-boy shenanigans; yet it would be a brave mayor who dared cancel an annual Pride Parade because it was inappropriate for children to see. And so on. 

    This cancer erupted on our society with the disgraceful Senate Confirmation Hearings on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991. That is where the term 'sexual harassment' was invented and became a New Normal.

   The Corporate Media soon learned that 'sex scandals' sell. In reality, they'd always known that; but before the Thomas Hearings the Media had to find scandals that actually were serious and had some basis in fact. After the Thomas Hearings, they learned that they could manufacture scandals and accuse people on rumor and hearsay. Thomas was eventually confirmed, but a few other uppity Negroes like O.J. Simpson, Mike Tyson, Kobe Bryant, and Bill Cosby weren't so fortunate. 

  When the Clinton Co-Presidency assumed office in 1992, Hillary Clinton and her Lesbian friends declared a "gender war" which the Angloboobs, as per usual, uncritically swallowed. Instead of standing up to this depravity, the Right---also as per usual---adopted the same policy. I well recall former Republican Senator Robert Packwood coming into conflict with then-GOP leader Bob Dole over some resolution in which Packwood broke ranks with the Republicans. Shortly thereafter, Packwood found himself in the same boat as Thomas had been and was forced to resign. That formed the dangerous precedent of men losing positions for these kinds of allegations. Ultimately this hysteria resulted with the failed Impeachment of President Clinton. Passing over Clinton's other crimes like ordering the mass-murder of the Branch Davidians, or egregious acts of corruption, or abuses of the War Powers Act, the Republicans tried Clinton for doing what thousands of American men routinely do: he had an extra-marital affair and lied about it when he got caught. Despite Clinton's acquittal, the witch-hunts have continued unabated down to the present day.

     How did we get to this level of irrationality? Well, we are talking about convincing people who already believe that wearing a cotton face-cloths actually stop viruses or think that driving cars causes bad weather. Deceiving Angloboobs and fanning them into outbreaks of mass-hysteria is really not an especially difficult task. 

    But that aside, there are two main reasons why sexual witch-hunting has become a New Normal. The first is that it is driven by Envy. Women are naturally attracted to powerful/popular men; and some men, in turn, take advantage of that situation. That arouses a lot of jealousy upon some of the less-gifted populace. It especially arouses the fury of homosexuals---and the U.S. Government and Media are full of them. Hillary Clinton is a great example of this kind of jealous fury. An obvious Lesbian, Hillary was enraged that her husband was a 'chick magnet' but desirable women ignored her sexually. (Don't ask me; I don't know what they see in him either, but Bill Clinton admittedly has an attraction factor most men would love to have). This jealous fury has led Hillary with an obsession to level the sexual playing-field through political means. 

    The second reason that witch-hunting has continued is because it has weaponized sexuality. It has become the perfect tool for anybody---from high-level Corporate Oligarchs down to the passive-aggressive sniveling little government bureaucrat---to destroy anybody they don't want in their way any longer. Why give up what works? 

    And there we have the reality behind postmodern sexual politics. Originating in a sleazy political circus; driven by psychosexual neurotics; promoted by the Media for ratings; and sustained by jealousy and opportunism---the English-speaking world should blush with shame every time stories like these come out. Fortunately for the witch-hunters, though, our society long ago lost any sense of self-respect. 

    It never used to be like this. Sexuality was always considered a personal and private matter: not something to be displayed and dragged into daylight for public voyeurism. The Church---contrary to popular contemporary belief---never even considered natural sexual attraction a sin.*(see note below) St. Thomas Aquinas wrote: "St. John of Damascus said that sin exists because persons turn themselves from nature to what is contrary to nature. And so we hold that sin is contrary to nature. But sexual desire is natural, for nature has taught every animal to desire. Therefore, sexual desire is not original sin." Of course, there are limits on how this desire should be acted upon, both by religion and civilization. Being a cad like Cuomo and Porter had consequences then too.

     

    Worst of all though is that this petty obsession with sexuality distracts from real, very serious, and less personal issues. For example, does anyone really believe that Jeffery Epstein ran his operation in the Virgin Islands strictly for entertainment purposes? Besides Bill Clinton himself, Epstein's frequent visitors included Ehud Barak, former head of the Mossad. Epstein was a huge investor in Israeli tech firms building domestic spying technology. One of his major fund investors was Les Wexner, another billionaire with ties to the Mossad. Wexner was a supporter of RINO Romney and left the GOP in 2018, to "distance himself from Trumpism." 

    With all the horror "OMG! Older men having sex with younger women! And some were legal minors! Outrage! Horror!" no one notices that Epstein was a huge supporter of the Great Reset/NWO policies. Not only did he meet with WEF leader Prince Charles' brother, Andrew: he had deep ties to our current financial Oligarchs, like Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Reid Hoffmann, Eric Schmidt, George Soros, and more, including WEF scum from the Arab Royalty. 

      Epstein, like his friend Gates, was deeply committed to eugenics, and founded Harvard University's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics. Everybody focuses on the lurid details of Epstein's sexual practices while his real crimes (and those of his accomplices) go unnoticed. 

      The same is true now in both the Cuomo and Porter cases. The thousands killed in Cuomo's nursing-homes, the scores of thousands impoverished by the Scam-demic 'emergency orders', the people driven to depression and suicide, their corruption and subservience to financial oligarchs---just ignore that, we're told---and fly into uncontrolled rage because somebody acted like a cad. It's just none of our business. What they did elsewhere, that is what we should focus on. But until Anglospherians stop treating the world scene like one big Reality TV Show, the real criminals will keep getting away with their crimes while the underlings get sacrificed for absolutely nothing. 

*******************

    Note: some Manosphere Red Pills claim that Christianity is hostile to sexuality, and quote Christ's saying from the Sermon on the Mount that: "everyone who looks on a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart." It is obvious from the context---both in Greek and English---that Jesus is referring to lusting after another man's wife. How can one commit adultery, unless one or both parties are married? The passage they quote is in the middle of a paragraph concerning adultery and divorce.